Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Piperacillin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Activities of beta-lactams against Acinetobacter genospecies as determined by agar dilution and E-test MIC methods.

The agar dilution MIC method was used to test activities of ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, inhibitors alone, ceftazidime, and imipenem against 237 Acinetobacter genospecies. A total of 93.2% of strains were beta-lactamase positive by the chromogenic cephalosporin method. Overall, ampicillin-sulbactam was the most active combination against all strains (MIC at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC50] and MIC90, 4.0 and 32.0 microg/ml; 86.9% susceptible at < or = 16 microg/ml), followed by ticarcillin-clavulanate (16.0 and 128.0 microg/ml; 85.7% susceptible at < or = 64 microg/ml), piperacillin-tazobactam (16.0 and 128.0 microg/ml; 84.8% susceptible at < or = 64 microg/ml), and amoxicillin-clavulanate (16.0 and 64.0 microg/ml; 54.4% susceptible at < or =16 microg/ml). Ceftazidime and imipenem yielded MIC50s and MIC90s of 8.0 and 64.0 microg/ml (ceftazidime) and 0.5 and 1.0 microg/ml (imipenem), respectively; 71.3% of strains were susceptible to ceftazidime at < or = 16 microg/ml, and 99.2% were susceptible to imipenem at < or = 8 microg/ml. Sulbactam was the most active beta-lactamase inhibitor alone (MIC50 and MIC90, 2.0 and 16.0 microg/ml); clavulanate and tazobactam were less active (16.0 and 32.0 microg/ml for both compounds). Enhancement of beta-lactams by beta-lactamase inhibitors was not always seen in beta-lactamase-positive strains, and activity of combinations such as ampicillin-sulbactam was due to the inhibitor alone. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most resistant genospecies. By contrast, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter johnsonii, Acinetobacter junii, Acinetobacter radioresistens, and other non-Acinetobacter baumannii strains were more susceptible to all compounds tested. E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of agar dilution MICs in 38.4 to 89.6% of cases and within 2 dilutions in 61.6 to 98.6% of cases.

Acinetobacter↗
PubMed1997

Antianaerobic activity of the ketolide RU 64004 compared to activities of four macrolides, five beta-lactams, clindamycin, and metronidazole.

Agar dilution methodology (with added Oxyrase in the case of the macrolide group to allow incubation without added CO2) was used to compare the activity of RU 64004, a new ketolide, with the activities of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, clindamycin, amoxicillin with and without clavulanate, piperacillin with and without tazobactam, metronidazole, and imipenem against 379 anaerobes. Overall, RU 64004 yielded an MIC at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC50) of 1.0 microg/ml and an MIC90 of 16.0 microg/ml. In comparison, MIC50s and MIC90s of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin were 2.0 to 8.0 and >64.0 microg/ml, respectively. MICs of macrolides, including RU 64004, were higher for Bacteroides ovatus, Fusobacterium varium, Fusobacterium mortiferum, and Clostridium difficile than for the other species. RU 64004 was more active against gram-positive rods and cocci, Prevotella and Porphyromonas spp., and fusobacteria other than F. mortiferum and F. varium than against the Bacteroides fragilis group. Overall MIC50s and MIC90s (in micrograms per milliliter), respectively, of other compounds were as follows: clindamycin, 1.0 and 16.0; amoxicillin, 4.0 and 64.0; amoxicillin-clavulanate, 0.5 and 4.0; piperacillin, 8.0 and >64.0; piperacillin-tazobactam, 1.0 and 16.0; metronidazole, 1.0 and 4.0; and imipenem, 0.25 and 1.0.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Comparative activities of clinafloxacin against gram-positive and -negative bacteria.

Activities of clinafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, and imipenem against 354 ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -intermediate-resistant organisms were tested by agar dilution. Clinafloxacin yielded the lowest quinolone MICs (< or = 0.5 microg/ml against ciprofloxacin-susceptible organisms and < or = 16.0 microg/ml against ciprofloxacin-intermediate-resistant organisms) compared to those of levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Ceftazidime, piperacillin alone or combined with tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and imipenem usually yielded higher MICs against ciprofloxacin-resistant strains.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

Multicenter study of in vitro susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group, 1995 to 1996, with comparison of resistance trends from 1990 to 1996.

Antimicrobial resistance, including plasmid-mediated resistance, among the species of the Bacteroides fragilis group is well documented. An analysis of the in vitro susceptibility of B. fragilis group species referred between 1995 and 1996 as well as during a 7-year (1990 to 1996), prospective, multicenter survey of over 4,000 clinical isolates of B. fragilis group species was undertaken to review trends in the percent resistance to and geometric mean MICs of the antibiotics tested. There was a trend toward a decrease in the geometric mean MICs of most beta-lactam antibiotics, while the percent resistance to most agents was less affected. Within the species B. fragilis, the geometric mean MICs showed significant (P < 0.05) decreases for piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, piperacillin, ticarcillin, ceftizoxime, cefotetan, and cefmetazole; a significant increase was observed for clindamycin and cefoxitin. For the non-B. fragilis species, a significant decrease in the geometric mean MICs was observed for meropenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, piperacillin, ticarcillin, ceftizoxime, and cefmetazole; a significant increase was observed for cefoxitin. Significant increases in percent resistance were observed within the B. fragilis strains for ticarcillin and ceftizoxime and within the non-B. fragilis isolates for cefotetan. Significant increases in percent resistance among all B. fragilis group species were observed for clindamycin, while imipenem showed no significant change in resistance trends. The trend analysis for trovafloxacin was limited to 3 years, since the quinolone was tested only in 1994, 1995, and 1996. During the 7 years analyzed, there was no resistance to metronidazole or chloramphenicol observed. The data demonstrate that resistance among the B. fragilis group species has decreased in the past several years, the major exception being clindamycin. The majority of the resistance decrease has been for the beta-lactams in B. fragilis, compared to other species. The reasons for these changes are not readily apparent.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 as a quality control isolate for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae with haemophilus test medium.

Current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) susceptibility guidelines for quality control testing with Haemophilus influenzae do not include a beta-lactamase-producing strain that could detect the deterioration of the beta-lactamase inhibitor components of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam. The objective of the study was to determine if comparable quality control results for Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, a beta-lactamase-producing strain, would be produced for the three beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor agents with Haemophilus test medium and Mueller-Hinton medium. The criteria used in this study to determine if Haemophilus test medium was acceptable for quality control testing of E. coli ATCC 35218 was that 100% of the results obtained with an antimicrobial agent-methodology combination needed to be within the acceptable NCCLS ranges established with Mueller-Hinton medium. The MIC testing results obtained by the broth microdilution and E-test methods with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and piperacillin-tazobactam were all within the NCCLS ranges; however, the results obtained with ampicillin-sulbactam by both methods were not within the NCCLS ranges. Acceptable results were obtained by the disk diffusion methodology with ampicillin-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam but not with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. When performing susceptibility testing with H. influenzae with the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitors, in addition to quality control testing with H. influenzae ATCC 49247, testing of E. coli ATCC 35218 on Haemophilus test medium is an effective way to monitor the beta-lactamase inhibitors in some antimicrobial agent-methodology combinations.

Culture Media↗
PubMed1999

Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections. The risk of emergence of antibiotic resistance may vary with different antibiotic treatments. To compare the risks of emergence of resistance associated with four antipseudomonal agents, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin, we conducted a cohort study, assessing relative risks for emergence of resistant P. aeruginosa in patients treated with any of these drugs. A total of 271 patients (followed for 3,810 days) with infections due to P. aeruginosa were treated with the study agents. Resistance emerged in 28 patients (10.2%). Adjusted hazard ratios for the emergence of resistance were as follows: ceftazidime, 0.7 (P = 0.4); ciprofloxacin, 0.8 (P = 0.6); imipenem, 2.8 (P = 0.02); and piperacillin, 1.7 (P = 0.3). Hazard ratios for emergence of resistance to each individual agent associated with treatment with the same agent were as follows: ceftazidime, 0.8 (P = 0.7); ciprofloxacin, 9.2 (P = 0.04); imipenem, 44 (P = 0.001); and piperacillin, 5.2 (P = 0.01). We concluded that there were evident differences among antibiotics in the likelihood that their use would allow emergence of resistance in P. aeruginosa. Ceftazidime was associated with the lowest risk, and imipenem had the highest risk.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Role of permeability in the activities of beta-lactams against gram-negative bacteria which produce a group 3 beta-lactamase.

The production of a group 3 beta-lactamase permitted Escherichia coli to raise the MICs of ceftazidime, cefpirome, and meropenem greatly but those of imipenem and piperacillin only slightly. The ratios of maximum rate of hydrolysis to K(m) of ceftazidime, cefpirome, and piperacillin were lower than those of meropenem and imipenem for the group 3 beta-lactamase. The permeability coefficients for piperacillin and meropenem were higher than those for ceftazidime and cefpirome. Imipenem had the highest permeability coefficient.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Consumption of imipenem correlates with beta-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

It is generally assumed that the antibiotic prescription policy of a hospital has a significant impact on bacterial resistance rates; however, few studies are available to support this concept with valid statistical data. During a 3-year period from 1997 to 2000, we monitored the consumption of beta-lactam and other antibiotics with known activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a 600-bed community hospital. Monthly isolations of P. aeruginosa were assessed, and resistance rates were recorded. Partial correlation coefficients between consumption and resistance rates were determined, taking into account possible associations with other variables such as seasonal effects and transfers from other hospitals. A total of 30 +/- 7 novel P. aeruginosa strains per month were isolated without epidemic clustering. Prescriptions of imipenem varied significantly during the study period, while prescriptions of other antipseudomonal agents were stable, with the exception of an increase in piperacillin-tazobactam prescriptions. Rates of resistance of P. aeruginosa to the antimicrobial agents used showed a time course similar to figures for imipenem consumption. Monthly rates of resistance to imipenem (partial correlation coefficient [cc], 0.63), piperacillin-tazobactam (cc, 0.57), and ceftazidime (cc, 0.56) were significantly associated with imipenem prescription rates in the same or the preceding month, while consumption of ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam had no apparent association with resistance. Among the variables investigated, imipenem consumption was identified as the major factor associated with both carbapenem and beta-lactam resistance in endemic P. aeruginosa. Periods of extensive imipenem use were associated with significant increases in resistance. Our data support the concept that a written antibiotic policy which balances the use of various antibiotic classes may help to avoid disturbances of a hospital's microbial sensitivity patterns.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed1985

Evaluation of three broth disk methods for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to imipenem.

Imipenem is a member of a new class of highly potent beta-lactam antibiotics, carbapenems, with an antibacterial spectrum that includes nearly all currently known aerobic and anaerobic bacterial species of clinical significance. Although relatively stable in most standard laboratory media used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, imipenem undergoes rapid inactivation in thioglycolate broth, a recommended medium for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria by the broth disk method. In the current study, a panel of 36 anaerobic bacteria consisting of 28 clinical isolates and eight quality control strains was used to determine the suitability and accuracy of the broth disk methods with brain heart infusion, Schaedler, and anaerobic broths, in comparison to the reference agar dilution method, for the anaerobic susceptibility testing of imipenem. To achieve single test concentrations of approximately 8, 16, and 64 micrograms/ml for imipenem, cefoxitin, and piperacillin, respectively, which correspond to the MIC breakpoints of the test drugs, four 10-microgram imipenem disks, three 30-microgram cefoxitin disks, and three 100-microgram piperacillin disks were used in 5 ml of broth. The correlation between the reference agar dilution method and each of the three broth disk elution procedures evaluated was excellent, for imipenem (100% agreement) and somewhat less so for cefoxitin and piperacillin. Therefore, brain heart infusion, Schaedler, and anaerobic broths, but not thioglycolate broth, are suitable for anaerobic susceptibility testing of imipenem by the disk elution method.

Bacteria, Anaerobic↗
PubMed1988

Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

The six species of the Bacteroides fragilis group are potent pathogens and commonly have different susceptibility patterns. We determined the relative annual isolation rate of anaerobic bacteria and the susceptibility of B. fragilis group species isolated during 1987 at two community hospitals. The relative frequencies of isolation of 261 strains were as follows: B. fragilis, 61%; B. thetaiotaomicron, 17%; B. distasonis, 7%; B. vulgatus, 6%; B. ovatus, 5%; and B. uniformis, 4%. A total of 234 recent clinical isolates were tested against cefmetazole, cefotetan, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, clindamycin, imipenem, and piperacillin by a brucella agar dilution method. Imipenem was the most active agent tested with all but three isolates (two B. vulgatus and one B. distasonis) susceptible to less than 2 micrograms/ml. Of the cephalosporins tested, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefmetazole were relatively equal against B. fragilis, with 93 to 98% of strains susceptible to 32 micrograms/ml. Ceftizoxime was less active, with an MIC for 90% of strains tested of 128 micrograms/ml and only 75% of isolates susceptible to 32 micrograms/ml. Against B. ovatus, B. vulgatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, and B. uniformis, cefoxitin showed a two- to threefold-superior activity compared with that of cefotetan and cefmetazole. In general, ceftizoxime was much less active, except against B. distasonis, for which 78% of isolates were susceptible to 32 micrograms/ml compared with 68% for cefoxitin, 19% for cefmetazole, and 16% for cefotetan. Clindamycin and piperacillin showed activity similar to that of cefoxitin, except piperacillin was less active versus B. vulgatus and B. distasonis. We therefore suggest that clinical laboratories determine the species of B. fragilis group isolates as well as perform susceptibility studies on the isolates. Clinicians should be aware that while B. fragilis is the most frequent isolate, 38% of isolates are from other, more resistant B. fragilis group species.

Bacteroides Infections↗
PubMed2004

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter spp. by NCCLS broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods.

Although both broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) are listed by NCCLS as acceptable methods for testing Acinetobacter spp. for antimicrobial susceptibility, few studies have compared the results generated by the two methods. We tested 196 isolates of Acinetobacter spp. from nine U.S. hospitals and from the Centers for Disease Control culture collection by using BMD and DD and clinically appropriate antimicrobial agents. Categorical results for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, tobramycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were comparable for the two methods: there was only one very major (VM) error, with tobramycin, and only one major (M) error, with meropenem, when DD results were compared with BMD results. However, VM errors were frequent with the beta-lactams and beta-lactam-beta-lactam inhibitor combinations, while M errors were often observed with tetracyclines. For BMD, tests frequently exhibited subtle growth patterns that were difficult to interpret, especially for beta-lactams. If subtle growth (i.e., granular, small button, or "starry" growth) was considered positive, error rates between BMD and DD were unacceptably high for ampicillin-sulbactam (VM error, 9.8%; minor [m] error, 16.1%), piperacillin (VM error, 5.7%; m error, 13.5%), piperacillin-tazobactam (VM error, 9.3%; m error, 12.9%), ceftazidime (VM error, 6.2%; m error, 11.4%), cefepime (VM error, 6.2%; m error, 13.0%), cefotaxime (m error, 21.2%), ceftriaxone (m error, 23.3%), tetracycline (M error, 11.4%; m error, 32.1%), and doxycycline (M error, 2.6%). When subtle growth patterns were ignored, the agreement still did not achieve acceptable levels. To determine if the problems with BMD testing occurred in other laboratories, we sent frozen BMD panels containing beta-lactam drugs and nine isolates to six labs with experience in performing BMD and DD. Among these laboratories, cefepime MICs ranged from < or =8 to > or =32 microg/ml for four of the nine strains, confirming the problem in interpreting BMD results. Discrepancies between the categorical interpretations of BMD and DD tests were noted primarily with cefepime and piperacillin, for which the BMD results were typically more resistant. Clinical laboratories should be aware of these discrepancies. At present, there are no data to indicate which method provides more clinically relevant information.

Acinetobacter↗
PubMed2006

Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents.

One hundred recent clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were used to assess the quantitative (MIC) and qualitative (susceptibility category) accuracies of the MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2 automated susceptibility test systems when five-broad spectrum beta-lactams, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam, were tested. Isolates were selected so that the MICs for the isolates overrepresented the MICs near the breakpoints to assess precisely the agreement between the results obtained with the automated systems and the results obtained by the reference tests. The categorical and MIC results from the automated systems were compared to the consensus result of three reference methods: broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion. The consensus categorical testing (susceptibility and resistance) rates were 47 and 27%, respectively, for aztreonam; 59 and 14%, respectively, for cefepime; 44 and 43%, respectively, for ceftazidime; 71 and 19%, respectively, for imipenem; and 50 and 50%, respectively, for piperacillin-tazobactam. All systems tested exhibited a high, unacceptable level of very major (false-susceptible) errors for piperacillin-tazobactam (19 to 27%). Major (false-resistant) error rates were generally acceptable (0 to 3%), but minor error rates were elevated (8 to 32%) for cefepime (VITEK 2 and VITEK) and for aztreonam (all three systems), leading to consistent trends toward false resistance. Manufacturer reevaluation of these automated systems for the testing of selected beta-lactams with current clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa that exhibit contemporary resistance mechanisms would be prudent to minimize the potential for serious reporting errors.

Bacteriological Techniques↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antibiotic susceptibility of Serratia marcescens and Serratia liquefaciens.

BACKGROUND: Over a period of 20 years, a total of 1,603 Serratia isolates were recovered from clinical specimens and examined for susceptibility to 29 antimicrobial drugs using the Bauer-Kirby agar disk diffusion test. Serratia marcescens was recovered most frequently (n = 1,409), followed by S. liquefaciens (n = 172); other Serratia species were scarce. During the 2-decade observation period there occurred 35 putative episodes/clusters of nosocomial cross-infection and 1 pseudo-outbreak due to S. marcescens, but none due to S. liquefaciens. METHODS: The antimicrobial susceptibility data for S. marcescens and S. liquefaciens were subdivided into two observation periods: I = 1980-1993, and II = 1993-1999. The crude data (series A) obtained for S. marcescens were corrected in two ways: by the omission of repetitive patient isolates (series B) and the additional removal of outbreak isolates except for index case isolates (series C). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of data obtained in series IC and IIC disclosed an increase in the susceptibility of S. marcescens to ampicillin + sulbactam, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, fosfomycin, gentamicin, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, timentin and tobramycin during observation period II. Conversely, there was a decrease in susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid and trovafloxacin, and slightly diminished susceptibility to norfloxacin and ofloxacin during observation period II as compared with the previous period. The crude data obtained for S. liquefaciens required no correction, as there were only a few repeat isolates. There was an increase in susceptibility to ampicillin, ampicillin + sulbactam, cefuroxime, doxycycline, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and polymyxin B (clear inhibition zones). However, there was an inexplicable decrease in susceptibility to piperacillin + tazobactam. Cocarde growth around polymyxin B disks was noted with 55.8% of the S. marcescens isolates as compared with 6.8% of the S. liquefaciens isolates. Slime around fluoroquinolone inhibition zones was produced by 83.4% of the S. marcescens isolates. Slime production around carbapenem inhibition zones was noted with 52% of the S. liquefaciens isolates, but with only a single isolate of S. marcescens.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by in vivo tests.

BACKGROUND: Maculopapular and urticarial rashes are nonimmediate manifestations common during penicillin treatment; the former often represent cell-mediated hypersensitivity. Our objectives were to assess the incidence of allergy in adults reporting nonimmediate manifestations during penicillin therapy and to evaluate the diagnostic potential of patch tests, delayed-reading skin tests and challenges in such cases. METHODS: We used prick and intradermal tests as well as patch tests with penicillin determinants, ampicillin, amoxicillin and any other suspect penicillins. We also performed challenges with the suspect antibiotics. RESULTS: Such antibiotics were aminopenicillins in 93.1% of 259 patients, most of whom had suffered from maculopapular rashes followed by piperacillin (4.2%). Three subjects displayed immediate skin test positivity. Ninety-four subjects showed patch test and delayed intradermal test positivity to the culprit penicillin (90 to aminopenicillins and 4 to piperacillin) and were considered as having had delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Five of the 8 subjects who displayed delayed intradermal test positivity and patch test negativity to the suspect penicillin underwent challenges, 2 reacted positively to the responsible aminopenicillin. Among the remaining 154 with negative results in allergologic tests, 125 agreed to undergo challenges; only 3 reacted. In all, 98 patients -- 93 of whom had experienced maculopapular rashes -- displayed delayed hypersensitivity (94 to aminopenicillins and 4 to piperacillin). CONCLUSIONS: Both patch and intradermal tests are useful in evaluating nonimmediate reactions to penicillins, particularly maculopapular rashes. Patch test and delayed intradermal positivity together indicate delayed hypersensitivity. Intradermal testing appears to be slightly more sensitive than patch testing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Antibiotic susceptibility of community hospital blood culture isolates of gram-negative bacilli.

The comparative in vitro activity of amikacin, cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, moxalactam, piperacillin, ticarcillin and tobramycin against 170 community blood culture isolates of gram-negative bacilli was investigated using the quantitative plate dilution method. Results showed that amikacin, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, piperacillin and tobramycin were most active on a weight basis. Tobramycin and amikacin were quite active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa but one isolate showed an MIC of 50 micrograms/ml to both. The order of activity of the remaining drugs for P. aeruginosa was cefoperazone greater than moxalactam greater than cefotaxime and piperacillin greater than ticarcillin.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1988

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs, single and combined, with and without defibrinated human blood.

Twelve clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa of distinct pyocin type varied in susceptibility to 14 of 17 antimicrobial drugs. The 2 x MIC concentrations of 16 antimicrobial drugs combined with 55% (v/v) of fresh, defibrinated human blood yielded additive effects. Additive effects were noted with blood plus the MIC concentrations of all drugs tested except cefoperazone, gentamicin, and netilmicin. Blood combined with subinhibitory (1/2 MIC) concentrations of aztreonam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, fleroxacin, imipenem, and tobramycin, respectively, yielded additive effects; indifferent effects were observed with the remaining 10 blood plus 1/2 MIC drug combinations. The following drug combinations additively augmented the antibacterial activity of 65% (v/v) of human blood against two selected isolates of P. aeruginosa: tobramycin (1 microgram/ml) plus the MIC or 2 x MIC concentrations of azlocillin, aztreonam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin, respectively. Imipenem (8 micrograms/ml) combined with ceftazidime, cefoperazone, and piperacillin, but not aztreonam, enhanced the bactericidal activity of human blood. Rifampin (2 micrograms/ml) plus tobramycin (0.5-1 microgram/ml) combined with 8 or 16 micrograms/ml of azlocillin, aztreonam, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin, respectively, enhanced blood-mediated killing of three representative multiple-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Additional effective triple-drug combinations with human blood were rifampin + tobramycin + polymyxin B, rifampin + ciprofloxacin + imipenem, and rifampin + amikacin + imipenem. Ciprofloxacin (2 micrograms/ml) was the most potent intraphagocytic bactericidal drug of 16 tested agents (greater than or equal to 2 x MBC concentrations) against P. aeruginosa control strain ATCC 27853.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Distribution and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative isolates in intensive care units (ICU) in Belgian hospitals between 1996 and 1999.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the distribution and prevalence of resistance rates among Gram-negative isolates in Belgian intensive care units (ICUs) between 1996 and 1999. METHODS: During 1996-1997 and 1998-1999, over a total period of 10 and 9 months respectively, members of the NPRS Belgian Study group collected, on clinical indications, 3029 consecutive initial isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients admitted to 26 Belgian hospitals and performed minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations by means of the E-test. Break-points were defined according to the criteria of the NCCLS. RESULTS: The overall distribution of bacterial species was, in decreasing order of frequency: Pseudomonas aeruginosa > E. coli > E. aerogenes > K. pneumoniae > P. mirabilis > S. marcescens > E. cloacae > K. oxytoca > M. morganii > Stenotrophomonas maltophilia > Acinetobacter spp. All together these species and genera constituted about 90% of all isolates. The frequency of resistance for all the initial Gram-negative isolates in 1998-9 were: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 60%, piperacillin 31%, piperacillin-tazobactam 20%, cefuroxime 58%, ceftriaxone 31%, ceftazidime 17%, aztreonam 23%, cefepime 10%, imipenem 13%, gentamicin 12%, amikacin 12% and ciprofloxacin 21%. Apart for an increase in multiple drug resistance among P. aeruginosa isolates, no significant trends were observed neither in species distribution nor in the overall prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative isolates from Belgian ICUs between 1996-7 and 1998-9. CONCLUSIONS: Among Gram-negative isolates in Belgian ICUs, a very high frequency of resistance was seen to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefuroxime, and rather high frequencies of resistance to piperacillin, ceftriaxone and aztreonam. Taking into account the species distribution and the prevalence of resistance, cefepime, imipenem, amikacin and gentamicin appeared generally suitable for empirical therapeutic use in severe ICU-acquired Gram-negative infections in Belgium. However, the therapeutic strategy should be adapted according to the local ecology of resistance.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Clinical and economic outcomes of empiric parenteral antibiotic therapy for pneumonia: a retrospective study of 1,032 hospitalized patients.

The spiraling increase in pharmaceutical costs in hospitals means that the economic aspects of pharmacological therapy can no longer be ignored. The aim of the present study was to evaluate care and cost outcomes following initial therapy with parenteral antibiotics in a hospital setting for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia and pleurisy with or without complications). From January to December 1996, a total of 1,032 patients were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 71.9 years (range, 16-100 years). Piperacillin was most frequently prescribed (n=369), followed by ceftriaxone (n=324) and ceftazidime (n=161), among other antibiotics. The clinical success ranged from a maximum of 85.0% and 85.4% for piperacillin and ceftriaxone, respectively, to a minimum of 72.7% and 75.2% for cefodizime and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Differences between the antibiotic regimens emerged for mean prescribed daily doses, therefore the daily cost per administered dose was much lower for antibiotics such as piperacillin or ceftriaxone than for cefotaxime or ceftazidime. Ceftriaxone, at just over 177,840 Italian liras per success, was more cost-effective than other third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftazidime and cefotaxime, whose cost-effectiveness ratios were 420,590 and 272,030 Italian liras, respectively. A comparison of cost ratios for the seven antibiotic regimens evaluated indicates that using ceftriaxone led to a 57.72% cost savings per clinical success compared to using other third generation cephalosporins such as ceftazidime, and a 69.45% savings compared to therapy with ciprofloxacin.

Adolescent↗