Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

A ten-year prospective study of vertebral canal size as a predictor of back pain.

This prospective study compared ultrasound measurement of the lumbar vertebral canal with subsequent back pain; 669 mining and nursing recruits had been measured before 1980, and 450 replied to a postal questionnaire in 1990. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of back pain or the need to be off work with back pain, in those whose canals were above and below the mean. However, going to bed with back pain was more frequent in those with small canals and approached significance (P = 0.068). Those with small canals were more likely to visit doctors and have treatment for back pain. Canal measurement is not a predictor for back pain, but as a risk factor for severe back pain in early working life, it approaches significance.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed an education and training program concerning back and pelvic problems among pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: The program was aimed at reducing back and pelvic posterior pain during pregnancy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back and posterior pelvic pain accounts for the majority of sick leave among pregnant women. No previous study has suggested any type of solution to this problem. METHODS: Four hundred and seven consecutive pregnant women were included in the study and randomly assigned into three groups. Group A served as controls while different degrees of interventions were made in groups B and C. RESULTS: Serious back or posterior pelvic pain developed in 47% of all women. Pain-related problems were reduced in groups B and C (P < 0.05), and sick-leave frequency was reduced in group C (P < 0.01). For some of the women in this group, pain intensity was also reduced 8 weeks post partum (P < 0.05). Weekly physical exercise before pregnancy reduced the risk for back pain problems in pregnancy (P < 0.05). A non-elastic sacro-iliac belt offered some pain relief to 82% of the women with posterior pelvic pain. CONCLUSIONS: An individually designed program reduced sick leave during pregnancy. Working with groups was less effective. Differentiation between low back and posterior pelvic pain was essential. Good physical fitness reduced the risk of back pain in a subsequent pregnancy. Reduction of posterior pelvic pain by a non-elastic pelvic support was experienced by 82% of the women with posterior pelvic pain.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1994

Low back pain and urinary incontinence. A hypothetical relationship.

STUDY DESIGN: An apparent association of low back pain with urinary incontinence was observed. Sixteen patients were investigated for organic neurologic and genito-urinary disease or deficit, which could provide a conventional explanation for the incontinence. OBJECTIVES: The unusual association of low back pain alone, with urinary incontinence, should be brought to the attention of clinicians, in the search for neurologic mechanisms to explain the phenomenon. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Over 5 years, a spinal practice reviewed 5000 new patients, most presenting with low back pain. Sixteen low back pain patients had urgency incontinence of urine, of varying severity but sufficient in all cases to cause daily distress and disruption of routine. Twelve of the sixteen patients had surgery (spinal fusion in 11 and total hip replacement in one), and four are awaiting surgery. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years. METHODS: Plain radiography, detailed neurologic examination, myelography, or computed tomography scanning of lumbar spine, urine culture, and urodynamic studies were the investigations used, with a few exceptions relating to those patients whose urinary symptoms were revealed retrospectively. RESULTS: When surgery reduced low back pain successfully (11 of 12 patients), the urgency incontinence was cured or improved. In one patient, the low back pain continued, associated with a pseudarthrosis in the fusion mass, and the urinary symptoms were unchanged. In the four patients awaiting surgery, the urinary symptoms are unchanged. The investigations did not reveal any neurologic or genito-urinary pathology in any patient. CONCLUSION: A rare association between severe low back pain and urgency incontinence of urine, not explained on the basis of any conventional neurologic or genito-urinary pathology, should be recognized.

Female↗
PubMed1994

The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part IV: Surgical correction and back pain.

OBJECTIVES: This study determined whether the prevalence, nature, and consequences of back pain in adulthood among persons who underwent Harrington rod instrumentation was related to the number of vertebrae fused, distal level of hook insertion, and degree of correction. STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as a comparative retrospective cohort study. Subjects referred for AIS between 1960 and 1979 to a large pediatric hospital in Montreal, Quebec, were entered into the cohort. A population based control group was selected from the general population of Quebec using a telephone survey. METHODS: Back pain was assessed by postal questionnaire administered in 1990. Data was analyzed using two multivariate regression models: relative risk regression for dichotomous outcomes and ordinal regression for outcomes measured on an ordinal scale. RESULTS: Among the 723 AIS subjects who had surgery at Ste. Justine's Hospital, 555 completed the questionnaire on back pain. Overall, 73% of patients treated surgically reported back pain in the past year. Proportions varied little by presurgery characteristics or by degree of surgical correction. The distal level of fusion did not influence, in any consistent way, the occurrence of back pain in later life nor the degree of disability associated with back pain. This study does not provide any evidence that extending the level of fusion down even as far as L4 will increase the prevalence of back pain in adulthood.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

The prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in a general practice setting.

STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred patients, attending their general practitioners with attacks of acute low back pain, formed the subject population for a study of fear avoidance and other variables in the prediction of chronicity. Follow-up was at 2 and 12 months. OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis to be tested was that evidence of psychological morbidity, particularly fear-avoidance behavior, would be manifest from the outset of the presenting attack in susceptible subjects. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While back pain is an almost universal human experience, only about 5% of sufferers seek medical advice. Most of these respond to conservative treatment. However, approximately 10% of those who experience an acute attack of low back pain go on to become chronic sufferers. METHODS: Psychosocial and physiological data (including fear-avoidance measures) were collected from a sample of 300 acute low back pain patients within 1 week of presentation and at 2 months, to try to predict 12 month outcome. RESULTS: Data analysis showed that subjects who had not recovered by 2 months were those who went on to become chronic low back pain patients (7.3%). Using multiple regression analyses, fear-avoidance variables were the most successful in predicting outcome. Using multiple discriminant function analyses, the results suggest that the outcome in terms of the future course of low back pain can be correctly classified in 66% from fear-avoidance variables alone and in 88% of patients from all variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, at the earliest stage of low back pain, fear of pain should be identified by clinicians and, where this is severe, pain confrontation should arguably form part of the approach to treatment.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

A prospective study evaluating early rehabilitation in preventing back pain chronicity in mine workers.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of education and early rehabilitation in the prevention of back pain chronicity in coal mine workers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A new mine was established in central Queensland, Australia. Preventing chronicity is important in the treatment of back pain in the industrial setting, because back pain is often refractory to treatment. Back pain patients also constitute the majority of compensation claims. METHODS: A back pain program was instituted that comprised work force education, early injury reporting, first aid at the mine, and changing workplace psychosocial perceptions. Management employees were actively involved. The time off work, number of claims per hundred workers, and costs per claim were compared with another mine in the area. RESULTS: The median time to return to work was 10 days. In the study group the number of claims and costs per claim were significantly less (P < 0.01) as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This was an easy to institute, inexpensive back pain program, which succeeded in preventing back pain chronicity in the studied group of mine workers, with no worker being off work for more than 60 days.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1995

An epidemiologic study of episodes of back pain care.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective community-based, observational design. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and risk/prognostic factors for back pain episodes of care in a population representing the nonelderly in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous United States studies of the epidemiology of back pain care have used defined industrial populations or have relied on the patient's recall of symptoms and care. METHODS: Claims forms from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, a randomized controlled trial of the use of health services, were analyzed. Claims forms were selected if one of the patient-designated reasons for the visit was back pain. Visits were grouped into episodes of care. Descriptive statistics were calculated for episodes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for independent explanatory sociodemographic and health status variables associated with back pain episodes of care. RESULTS: The 3105 adults in the Health Insurance Experiment had a combined 11,171 person-years of exposure. Six-hundred-eighty-six persons (22%) had a total 1020 episodes of back pain care, representing 8825 visits. Seventy-one percent of persons had a single episode during the Health Insurance Experiment, and 40% of these episodes consisted of a single visit. There were 9.1 episodes per 100 person-years. Insurance status, geographic site, white race, lesser education, poorer physical functioning, and greater pain at base-line all were independently associated with having a back pain episode of care. CONCLUSIONS: Back pain episodes of care occur commonly in the adult U.S. population, but usually are brief and recur infrequently.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

STUDY DESIGN: An inception cohort design was used in which 421 patients were evaluated systematically with a standard battery of psychosocial assessment tests (Structured Interview for DSM-III-R Diagnosis, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and Million Visual Pain Analog Scale) within 6 weeks of acute back pain onset. OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the predictive power of a comprehensive assessment of psychosocial and personality factors in identifying acute low back pain patients who subsequently develop chronic pain disability problems (as measured by job-work status at 1-year follow-up evaluation). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been a relative paucity of prospective research in the United States comprehensively evaluating potential psychosocial risk factors that are associated with those injured workers who subsequently fail to return to work and productivity after 1 year because of low back pain disability. Such research has been quite limited because of the time and cost involved in conducting prospective studies. METHODS: All study patients were symptomatic with lumbar pain syndrome for no more than 6 weeks. These acute patients were tracked every 3 months, culminating in a structured telephone interview being conducted 1 year after the initial evaluation to document return-to-work status. RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses, conducted to differentiate between patients who were back at work after 1 year versus patients who were not because of the original back injury, revealed the importance of three psychosocial measures: self-reported pain and disability, scores on Scale 3 of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, and workers' compensation and personal injury insurance status. The model generated correctly classified 90.7% of the cases. Results revealed that major psychopathology, such as depression and substance abuse, did not precede or cause the development chronic pain disability. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the presence of a robust "psychosocial disability factor" that is associated with those injured workers who are likely to develop chronic low back pain disability problems. Based on these data, a statistical algorithm has been generated that can identify those acute patients who will require early intervention to prevent the development of chronic disability. The second major result is that preinjury or concomitant psychopathology does not appear to predispose patients to chronic pain disability, although high rates of psychopathology have been shown in chronic low back pain. Future research should be directed at emotional vulnerability and psychosocial events in the period after the injury that may lead to chronicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The influence of indemnification by workers' compensation insurance on recovery from acute backache. North Carolina Back Pain Project.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort was recruited from 208 randomly selected North Carolina practices. OBJECTIVE: To compare the course of compensation claimants with gainfully employed patients not so insured from the time when they first sought care for acute back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The human and financial cost attributable to disabling chronic low back pain identified by worker's compensation programs continues to escalate. We explored the antecedents to this phenomenon. METHOD: Consecutive patients with acute low back pain were interviewed by telephone within 1 week of first seeking care and in follow-up calls after 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks to monitor functional and work status. RESULTS: Of the 1633 patients enrolled, 505 were insured by workers' compensation. These were compared with 861 who had been employed on any job for pay within 3 months of the onset of their backache but whose care was not so underwritten. Those with compensable back pain were more likely to categorize their tasks as physically demanding and had taken more time off work in the month before the baseline interview (P = 0.02). Recovery of the sense of wellness they enjoyed before this episode of back pain was delayed (Cox Model: Hazard Ratio = 0.822; P < 0.001; confidence interval: 0.733, 0.923), but recovery of function or return to work was not. This delay was independent of type of health care and perception of task demand and beyond that which could be ascribed to the quality of back pain. CONCLUSION: Each of these associations is a reproach to the fashion in which workers' compensation insurance for regional back pain serves the ethic that is its raison d'être.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed two groups of subjects during forward bending. Group 1 (n = 20) contained subjects with a history of low back pain and Group 2 (n = 21) included subjects without a history of low back pain. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to establish the amount and pattern of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending, and determine differences in motion in subjects with and without a history of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reported values for lumbar spine motion during forward bending vary from 23.9 degrees to 60 degrees and hip motion during forward bending ranges from 26 degrees to 66 degrees. There has been no direct study of both lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain to establish differences in total amounts or pattern of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending. METHODS: A three-dimensional optoelectric motion analysis system was used to measure the amount and velocity of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending. Each subject performed three trials of forward bending that were averaged and used for statistical analysis. Hamstring flexibility was also assessed by two clinical tests, the passive straight leg raising and active knee extension tests. RESULTS: Mean total forward bending for all subjects was 111 degrees: 41.6 degrees from the lumbar spine and 69.4 degrees from the hips. There were no group differences for total amounts of lumbar spine and hip motion or velocity during forward bending. The pattern of motion was described by calculating lumbar-to-hip flexion ratios for early (0-30 degrees), middle (30-60 degrees), and late (60-90 degrees) forward bending. For all subjects, mean lumbar-to-hip ratios for early, middle, and late forward bending were 1.9, 0.9, and 0.4, respectively. Therefore, the lumbar spine had a greater contribution to early forward bending, the lumbar spine and hips contributed almost equally to middle forward bending, and the hips had a greater contribution to late forward bending. A t test revealed a difference between groups for the pattern of motion. Group 1 tended to move more at their lumbar spine during early forward bending and had a significantly lower lumbar-to-hip flexion ratio during middle forward bending (P < 0.01). Hamstring flexibility was strongly correlated to motion in subjects with a history of low back pain, but not in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide quantitative data to guide clinical assessment of forward bending motion. Results also suggest that although people with a history of low back pain have amounts of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending similar to those of healthy subjects, the pattern of motion is different. It may be desirable to teach patients with a history of low back pain to use more hip motion during early forward bending, and hamstring stretching may be helpful for encouraging earlier hip motion.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Educational and behavioral interventions for back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: A review of the literature was undertaken to identify and summarize randomized trials of educational, cognitive, and behavioral interventions for people with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies of back schools have varied widely in patient characteristics, back school length and content, and comparison treatment. The available evidence suggests that back schools do not affect long-term outcomes of people with back pain. METHODS: MEDLINE and PsycLIT databases were searched to identify randomized trials of cognitive and behavioral treatments for chronic low back pain. Outcome data were extracted from articles that met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The meta-analysis found that cognitive and behavioral treatments were superior to control conditions after treatment on measures of chronic low back pain, pain behavior, and disability. Follow-up comparisons of cognitive and behavioral treatments versus control conditions were not available. This meta-analysis did not find cognitive and behavioral therapies to differ from other active treatments on specific outcome measures, although only a few studies were available for each measure. CONCLUSION: It may be useful to incorporate cognitive-behavioral interventions in primary care settings, but additional research is needed to evaluate their efficacy in improving specific outcomes.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1996

Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteria.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients seen in primary care for low back pain. OBJECTIVES: A new measure of back pain outcomes is used to describe the status of back problems at various intervals after visits to primary care physicians and to identify subsets of patients with worse prognoses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most previous studies of the prognosis of back pain in primary care have failed to provide clinically useful information. METHODS: Baseline data were collected from 219 patients making an initial visit for an episode of low back pain to a primary care clinic. A measure of how patients reported they would feel if they had their current back symptoms for the rest of their lives ("Symptom Satisfaction") was used to distinguish good from poor outcomes. Patient outcomes were assessed 1, 3, 7, and 52 weeks after the index visit. RESULTS: Only 67% of patients reported good outcomes after 7 weeks, and only 71% were satisfied with their condition 1 year later. After controlling for the effects of other variables measured during the initial physician visit, only younger age, depression, and pain below the knee were significant predictors of poor outcome at 7 weeks, and only pain below the knee and depression were significant predictors at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of primary care patients with back pain who have poor outcomes appears to be higher than generally recognized. Ways of improving how primary care responds to patients with persisting pain should be investigated.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Patient characteristics associated with diagnostic imaging evaluation of persistent low back problems.

STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from the National Low Back Pain Study, a prospective observational multicenter study of patients referred for the evaluation and treatment of persistent low back problems. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with use of particular diagnostic imaging examinations in patients with persistent low back problems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research clinical practice guidelines on low back problems suggest that the use of particular diagnostic imaging tests for a given patient should be based on specific characteristics of that patient. METHODS: Use of diagnostic imaging examinations in 2,374 patients with persistent low back problems who were enrolled in the National Low Back Pain Study from 1986 to 1991 was analyzed. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics that distinguish between enrollees who underwent particular imaging studies. RESULTS: Characteristics that distinguished patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging from those who had received only lumbo-sacral spine radiographs included higher socioeconomic status, greater resource use in the preceding 12 months, more functional impairment, presence of sciatica, and presence of neurologic signs/symptoms suggestive of nerve root compromise. Suspected soft tissue involvement was characteristic of enrollees who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging, whereas suspected structural involvement characterized patients who received noncontrast computed tomography. Only nonclinical factors, such as higher annual household income, disability compensation, and male gender distinguished enrollees who had undergone both magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography from those who received only computed tomography-myelography. CONCLUSION: Particular patient socioeconomic and clinical characteristics are associated with receipt of specific imaging studies in evaluation of persistent low back problems.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Classics from the spine literature revisited: a randomized trial of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of a trial of bed rest for patients with acute low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity and results of the study, and their applicability to and influence on current clinical practice and recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although bed rest has been a cornerstone of treatment for acute low back pain, historically this recommendation was largely based on "expert opinion." In 1986, Deyo et al. published a randomized study of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain. Despite results from this and other studies, current clinical practice and treatment recommendations continue to overemphasize bed rest. METHODS: The study was reviewed using structured criteria adopted from the medical literature that focus on the validity of the study design, the results of the treatment, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were randomized to 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest. Groups were similar at baseline evaluation. Outcomes assessed at 3 and 12 weeks were similar between groups, except that patients receiving a recommendation for 2 days of bed rest had significantly fewer days of work absence than those recommended 7 days. Limitations of the study included poor compliance with recommended bed rest, especially in the 7-day group, a marginal sample size without information on relevant confidence intervals, and patient characteristics that may have affected the generalizability of these findings to others with acute low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, this study provided strong evidence that less bed rest was associated with similar outcomes for acute low back pain along with quicker return to work. Results from this and other studies support a shift away from bed rest as a primary recommendation in the initial management of low back pain. In spite of this, bed rest recommendations for episodes of low back pain remain common. Additional efforts are needed to change clinical practice.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1997

Construction work and low back disorder. Preliminary findings of the Hamburg Construction Worker Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional part of a longitudinal study in 571 male construction workers. OBJECTIVES: The Hamburg construction worker study is being conducted to assess the extent of musculoskeletal disorders in construction workers and factors predisposing for or leading to musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this analysis is to report findings about the association between job history and low back disorder. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Repetitive strain in forced positions during long periods of time has been reported as a risk factor for low back disorder. Of all construction workers, bricklayers predominantly are exposed to these conditions. METHODS: Subjects were recruited mainly from a routine health check-up. A structured interview with complete job history, job related activities, and symptoms was administered, and a detailed standardized physical examination was performed. Age-adjusted prevalences of low back pain were calculated, and logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and their confidence intervals for different durations of working in a specific job category and physical signs of low back disorder, adjusting for a variety of possible confounders. RESULTS: The 12 month prevalence of low back pain was highest in painters (57%), intermediate in concrete builders and bricklayers (41%), and lowest in carpenters and unskilled workers (38%). The age-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of low back disorder for having worked longer than 10 years as a bricklayer was 2.3 (1.2-4.5). CONCLUSIONS: Working longer than 10 years as a bricklayer was associated with signs of low back disorder. No comparable associations were found for house painters, carpenters, nor concrete builders. If replicated, these findings could be used to focus preventive measures on bricklayers with a long job history.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A clinical trial comparing a back pain group with a pain-free group. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether proprioceptive deficits existed in a group of individuals reporting low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Little work has so far been conducted on the measurement of proprioception in the spine. Those studies that have been carried out, however, have failed to identify proprioceptive deficits in individuals with back pain. Previous work on peripheral joints has revealed that proprioception is affected with muscular or joint injury or degeneration. METHODS: Forty individuals took part in the study, 20 with back pain and 20 with no pain. Participants were required to reproduce a predetermined target position, in standing and four-point kneeling, 10 times in 30 seconds. A computer screen was used to provide visual feedback on position. A mean deviation from the target position was obtained for each individual. A measurement of left elbow position sense was conducted in five individuals from each group to establish differences in short-term motor memory between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences between the subject groups in terms of short-term motor memory (P > 0.05). A two-way analysis of variance between subject groups and position to identify differences in accuracy (deviation from the target) found that there were differences between subject groups in either position (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in accuracy between the positions used (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in proprioception do exist between individuals with back pain and those free from back pain. Further research needs to be undertaken on proprioceptive exercise programs and their effect on back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Medication use for low back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal observational study of primary care patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe medications prescribed for back pain, 2) to identify patient characteristics associated with type of drug therapy, 3) to determine if the prescription of certain drugs is associated with better outcomes, and 4) to compare physician prescribing behavior with national guidelines. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few previous studies have focused on medication prescribing patterns for back pain in primary care. METHODS: Two-hundred nineteen patients aged 20-69 years who were making a first visit for an episode of back pain were studied. After the visit, patients completed questionnaires regarding sociodemographic characteristics, health status, back pain experience, and use of medications. Symptom severity and dysfunction were assessed by telephone 1 week after the visit. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of patients were prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 35% muscle relaxants, 12% narcotics, and 4% acetaminophen. Twenty percent received no medications. Patients were more likely to receive medications if they had a desire for medication, pain below the knee, less than 3 weeks of pain before visit, more severe symptoms, or greater dysfunction. Patients with more severe symptoms were more likely to receive narcotics or muscle relaxants. Patients with greater dysfunction were also more likely to receive narcotics. Type of drug therapy predicted symptom severity but not dysfunction after 1 week. Controlling for other factors, those receiving medications had less severe symptoms after 1 week than patients who received no medication. Patients receiving both muscle relaxants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had the best outcomes. Medication use for back pain in this health maintenance organization was generally concordant with national guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, often augmented by muscle relaxants, are a standard medical treatment for back pain in primary care. In this observational study, patients prescribed medications, particularly muscle relaxants, reported less severe symptoms after 1 week than those receiving no medications. However, randomized trials are needed to determine which medication or combinations of medications are most effective.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The role of complex, simultaneous trunk motions in the risk of occupation-related low back disorders.

STUDY DESIGN: Simultaneous trunk kinematic variables of industrial workers performing jobs with varying degrees of low back disorder risk were quantified, by using a three-dimensional electrogoniometer. OBJECTIVES: To assess the distinguishing patterns of simultaneous multidimensional (complex) motion parameters of workers performing manual material handling jobs with varying degrees of low back disorder risk. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is significant epidemiologic and biomechanical evidence that implicates simultaneously occurring or combined motions and loading as important risk factors follow back disorder. However, the specific levels or magnitudes and patterns of these complex motions at which risk of low back disorder is increased are still unknown. METHODS: An industrial database of 126 workers and jobs was used to quantify the complex trunk motions of groups with varying degrees of low back disorder risk. Three groups, low-, medium-, and high-risk, were defined on the basis of retrospective injury records of the corresponding jobs. The jobs were further classified into five cells of weight-lift rate combinations. Within each weight-lift rate cell, the three-dimensional trunk motion patterns of workers were analyzed. Bivariate distributions and cumulative distribution functions were used to compare the simultaneous occurrence of complex dynamic motions among risk groups. RESULTS: High- and medium-risk groups exhibited complex trunk motion patterns involving high magnitudes of combined velocities, especially at extreme sagittal flexion; whereas the low-risk group did not. Postural trunk information alone did not provide a consistent pattern of distinguishing among risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of complex simultaneous velocity patterns were unique to groups with increased low back disorder risk. Knowledge of these complex trunk velocity patterns in combination with key workplace factors provides a more sensitive means for identifying low back disorder occupational risk factors than does mere postural information.

Back Injuries↗