Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “replication”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Initiation of polyoma virus origin-dependent DNA replication through STAT5 activation by human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Several lines of evidence indicate that transcriptional activation is coupled with DNA replication initiation, but the nature of initiation of DNA replication in mammalian cells is unclear. Polyoma virus replicon is an excellent system to analyze the initiation of DNA replication in murine cells because its replication requires an enhancer, and all components of replication machinery, except for DNA helicase large T antigen, are supplied by host cells. This system was used to examine the role of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT5) in replication initiation of polyoma replicon in the mouse lymphoid cell line BA/F3. The plasmid with tandem repeats of consensus STAT5 binding sites followed by polyoma replication origin was replicated by stimulation with human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (hGM-CSF) in the presence of polyoma large T antigen in BA/F3 cells. Mutation analysis of the hGM-CSF receptor beta subunit revealed that only the box1 region is essential, and the C-terminal tyrosine residues are dispensable for the activity. Addition of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein suppressed this replication without affecting transcriptional activation of STAT5. Because deletion analysis of STAT5 indicates the importance of the C-terminal transcriptional activation domain of STAT5 for the initiation of replication, the role of this region in the activation of replication was examined with a GAL4-STAT5 fusion protein. GAL4-STAT5 activated replication of the plasmid containing tandem repeats of GAL4 binding sites and polyoma replication origin in BA/F3 cells. Mutation analysis of GAL4-STAT5 indicated that multiple serine residues coordinately have a role in activating replication. This is the first direct evidence indicating the potential involvement of STAT5 in replication.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: regulation and mechanisms.

The accurate and timely duplication of the genome is a major task for eukaryotic cells. This process requires the cooperation of multiple factors to ensure the stability of the genetic information of each cell. Mutations, rearrangements, or loss of chromosomes can be detrimental to a single cell as well as to the whole organism, causing failures, disease, or death. Because of the size of eukaryotic genomes, chromosomal duplication is accomplished in a multiparallel process. In human somatic cells between 10,000 and 100,000 parallel synthesis sites are present. This raises fundamental problems for eukaryotic cells to coordinate the start of DNA replication at each origin and to prevent replication of already duplicated DNA regions. Since these general phenomena were recognized in the middle of the 20th century the regulation and mechanisms of the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication have been intensively investigated. These studies were carried out to find the essential factors involved in the process and to determine their functions during DNA replication. These studies gave rise to a model of the organization and the coordination of DNA replication within the eukaryotic cell. The elegant experiments carried out by Rao and Johnson (1970) (1), who fused cells in different phases of the cell cycle, showed that G1 cells are competent for replication of their chromosomes, but lack a specific diffusible factor required to activate their replicaton machinery and showed that G2 cells are incompetent for DNA replication. These findings suggested that eukaryotic cells exist in two states. In G1 phase, cells are competent to initiate DNA replication, which is subsequently triggered in S phase. After completion of S phase, cells in G2 are no longer able to initiate DNA replication and they require a transition through mitosis to reenable initiation of DNA replication to take place in the next S phase. The Xenopus cell-free replication system has proved a good model system in which to study DNA replication in vitro as well as the mechanism preventing rereplication within a single cell cycle (2). Studies using this system resulted in the development of a model postulating the existence of a replication licensing factor, which binds to chromatin before the G1-S transition and which is displaced during replication (2, 3). These results were supported by genetic and biochemical experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) (4, 5). The investigation of cell division cycle mutants and the budding yeast origin of replication resulted in the concept of a prereplicative and a postreplicative complex of initiation proteins (6-9). These three individual concepts have recently started to merge and it has become obvious that initiation in eukaryotes is generally governed by the same ubiquitous mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Bleomycin-induced alterations in DNA replication: relationship to DNA damage.

Bleomycin (BLM), a well-known DNA scission agent, is assumed to inhibit intracellular DNA replication by damaging the DNA template (cis-acting mechanism), although other DNA damaging compounds can alter DNA replication through modulation of crucial replication factor(s) (trans-acting mechanism). The present study examines the relationship between DNA damage and inhibition of replication caused by BLM in the well-defined simian virus 40 (SV40) intracellular and cell-free in vitro systems. Treatment of SV40-infected BSC-1 cells for 2 h with BLM at 50 microg/mL, induced 0.3 break/viral genome. Under the same treatment conditions, analysis of replication intermediates on two-dimensional gels showed a decrease in both mass of SV40 replication intermediates and replication activity. The mass of SV40 intermediates was decreased to about 30%, whereas replication activity was reduced to less than 5%. These results suggest that BLM inhibits both initiation and elongation phases of SV40 replication. In a cell-free DNA replication system, extracts from BLM-treated cells (50 micro/mL) were able to support SV40 DNA replication by only 50%. In this study, non-drug-treated DNA template was used, implying that BLM can induce a trans-acting effect. Finally, the drug-induced effects on SV40 DNA replication in cell-free and intracellular viral systems were compared to the effects on genomic DNA replication in BSC-1 cells. Overall, the results support the concept that BLM-induced inhibition of DNA replication occurs by both trans- (inhibition of replication of nondamaged template) and cis-acting mechanisms (template damage).

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Involvement of eucaryotic deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases alpha and gamma in the replication of cellular and viral deoxyribonucleic acid.

In an effort to identify the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerase activities responsible for mammalian viral and cellular DNA replication, the effect of DNA synthesis inhibitors on isolated DNA polymerases was compared with their effects on viral and cellular DNA replication in vitro. DNA polymerase alpha, simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication in nuclear extracts, and CV-1 cell (the host for SV40) DNA replication in isolated nuclei all responded to DNA synthesis inhibitors in a quantitatively similar manner: they were relatively insensitive to 2',3'-dideoxythymidine 5'-triphosphate (d2TTP), but completely inhibited by aphidicolin, 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine 5'-triphosphate (araCTP), and N-ethylmaleimide. In comparison, DNA polymerases beta and gamma were inhibited by d2TTP but insensitive to aphidicolin and 20--30 times less sensitive to araCTP than DNA polymerase alpha. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) DNA polymerase and DNA polymerase alpha were the only enzymes tested that were relatively insensitive to d2TTP; DNA polymerases beta and gamma, phage T4 and T7 DNA polymerases, and Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I were 100--250 times more sensitive. The results with d2TTP were independent of enzyme concentration, primer-template concentration, primer-template choice, and the labeled dNTP. A specific requirement for DNA polymerase alpha in the replication of SV40 DNA was demonstrated by the fact that DNA polymerase alpha was required, in addition to other cytosol proteins, to reconstitute SV40 DNA replication activity in N-ethylmaleimide-inactivated nuclear extracts containing replicating SV40 chromosomes. DNA polymerases beta and gamma did not substitute for DNA polymerase alpha. In contrast to SV40 and CV-1 DNA replication, adenovirus type 2 (Ad-2) DNA replication in isolated nuclei was inhibited by d2TTP to the same extent as gamma-polymerase. Ad-2 DNA replication was also inhibited by aphidicolin to the same extent as alpha-polymerase. Synthesis of CV-1 DNA, SV40 DNA, and HSV-1 DNA in intact CV-1 cells was inhibited by aphidicolin. Ad-2 DNA replication was also inhibited, but only at a 100-fold higher concentration. We found no effect of 2'-3'-dideoxythymidine (d2Thd) on cellular or viral DNA replication in spite of the fact that Ad-2 DNA replication in isolated nuclei was inhibited 50% by a ratio of d2TTP/dTTP of 0.02. This was due to the inability of CV-1 and Hela cells to phosphorylate d2Thd to d2TTP. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that DNA polymerase alpha is the only DNA polymerase involved in replicating SV40 DNA and CV-1 DNA and that Ad-2 DNA replication involves both DNA polymerases gamma and alpha.

Adenoviruses, Human↗
PubMed1991

Characterization and comparative sequence analysis of replication origins from three large Bacillus thuringiensis plasmids.

The replication origins of three large Bacillus thuringiensis plasmids, derived from B. thuringiensis HD263 subsp. kurstaki, have been cloned in Escherichia coli and sequenced. The replication origins, designated ori 43, ori 44, and ori 60, were isolated from plasmids of 43, 44, and 60 MDa, respectively. Each cloned replication origin exhibits incompatibility with the resident B. thuringiensis plasmid from which it was derived. Recombinant plasmids containing the three replication origins varied in their ability to transform strains of B. thuringiensis, Bacillus megaterium, and Bacillus subtilis. Analysis of the derived nucleotide and amino acid sequences indicates that the replication origins are nonhomologous, implying independent derivations. No significant homology was found to published sequences of replication origins derived from the single-stranded DNA plasmids of gram-positive bacteria, and shuttle vectors containing the three replication origins do not appear to generate single-stranded DNA intermediates in B. thuringiensis. The replication origin regions of the large plasmids are each characterized by a single open reading frame whose product is essential for replication in B. thuringiensis. The putative replication protein of ori 60 exhibits partial homology to the RepA protein of the Bacillus stearothermophilus plasmid pTB19. The putative replication protein of ori 43 exhibits weak but extensive homology to the replication proteins of several streptococcal plasmids, including the open reading frame E replication protein of the conjugative plasmid pAM beta 1. The nucleotide sequence of ori 44 and the amino acid sequence of its putative replication protein appear to be nonhomologous to other published replication origin sequences.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Minimal replication origin of the 200-kilobase Halobacterium plasmid pNRC100.

We have identified the replication origin of pNRC100, a 200-kb plasmid of Halobacterium halobium, by assaying for replication ability of miniplasmids containing cloned fragments of pNRC100 and the mevinolin resistance selectable marker of Haloferax volcanii. First, we showed the replication ability of plasmid pNGHCMEV1, which contains the 19-kb HindIII-C fragment of pNRC100, by recovery of plasmid DNA from mevinolin-resistant transformants of H. halobium. The minimal replication origin of approximately 3.9 kb was defined by subcloning successively smaller regions of pNGHCMEV1 and assaying for plasmid replication in either H. halobium or H. volcanii. The same replication origin was also recovered after transformation of H. volcanii with a library of partial Sau3AI fragments of pNRC100. The nucleotide sequence of the minimal replication origin was determined and found to contain a long open reading frame, named repH, transcribed away from a highly A+T-rich region. The transcription start site was identified by primer extension analysis to be 17 to 18 nucleotides 5' to a putative repH start codon. The predicted product of the repH gene, an acidic protein with a molecular weight of 113,442, showed 24 to 27% identity with predicted gene products of H. volcanii plasmid pHV2 and H. halobium plasmid p phi HL, suggesting that each is involved in plasmid replication. One pNRC100 minireplicon, pNG11 delta 12, was analyzed by linker scanning mutagenesis, which showed the requirement of repH for replication. Restoration of the repH reading frame of one replication-defective pNG11 delta 12 derivative by introduction of a second small insertion resulted in reversion to replication proficiency. The replication ability of pNG11delta12 was lost when the entire A+T-rich region, about 550 bp long, was deleted but not when small insertions or deletions were introduced into this region. The presence of only 52 bp of the A+T-rich segment was sufficient to permit replication. The pNG11delta12 minireplicon was lost at high frequency from cells grown without mevinolin selection, suggesting that the plasmid partitioning locus of pNRC100 is absent in the minimal replication origin region. We discuss the possible roles of the repH gene and the A+T-rich region in replication of pNRC100.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Nuclear sites of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication and transcription colocalize at early times postinfection and are largely distinct from RNA processing factors.

We have visualized the intracellular localization of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 replication and transcription sites in infected HeLa cells by using direct labelling methods. The number of viral transcription foci increases in a limited way; however, the number of replication sites increases in a near-exponential manner throughout infection, and both replication and transcription sites are found buried throughout the nuclear interior. Simultaneous visualization of viral transcription and replication foci shows that the two processes colocalize at early times, but at later times postinfection, there are additional sites committed solely to replication. This contrasts with the situation in adenovirus-infected cells in which, throughout replication, sites of transcription are adjacent to but do not colocalize with sites of viral DNA replication. The data for an increase in HSV transcription sites suggest an initial phase of replication of input genomes which are then transcribed. Sites of HSV replication colocalize with viral DNA replication and packaging proteins but are largely distinct from the punctate distribution of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles. Very high multiplicities of infection have shown an upper limit of some 18 viral transcription foci per nucleus, suggesting cellular constraints on transcription site formation. Use of virus replication mutants confirms that the labelled foci are sites of viral RNA and DNA synthesis; in the absence of viral DNA replication functions, no replication foci and only a limited number of transcription foci were present. Absence of a packaging function had no apparent effect on transcription or replication site formation, illustrating that DNA packaging is not a prerequisite for ongoing DNA synthesis. Further, the essential HSV protein IE63 is required for efficient replication site formation at later times postinfection but is not required for transcription foci formation.

Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed2004

By inhibiting replication, the large hepatitis delta antigen can indirectly regulate amber/W editing and its own expression.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) expresses two essential proteins with distinct functions. The small hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg-S) is expressed throughout replication and is needed to promote that process. The large form (HDAg-L) is farnesylated, is expressed only at later times via RNA editing of the amber/W site, and is required for virion assembly. When HDAg-L is artificially expressed at the onset of replication, it strongly inhibits replication. However, there is controversy concerning whether HDAg-L expressed naturally at later times as a consequence of editing and replication can similarly inhibit replication. Here, by stabilizing the predicted secondary structure downstream from the amber/W site, a replication-competent HDV mutant that exhibited levels of editing higher than those of the wild type was created. This mutant expressed elevated levels of HDAg-L early during replication, and at later times, its replication aborted prematurely. No further increase in amber/W editing was observed following the cessation of replication, indicating that editing was coupled to replication. A mutation in HDAg-L and a farnesyl transferase inhibitor were both used to abolish the ability of HDAg-L to inhibit replication. Such treatments rescued the replication defect of the overediting mutant, and even higher levels of amber/W editing resulted. It was concluded that when expressed naturally during replication, HDAg-L is able to inhibit replication and thereby inhibit amber/W editing and its own synthesis. In addition, the structure adjacent to the amber/W site is suboptimal for editing, and this creates a window of time in which replication can occur in the absence of HDAg-L.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed1998

Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids.

An essential feature of bacterial plasmids is their ability to replicate as autonomous genetic elements in a controlled way within the host. Therefore, they can be used to explore the mechanisms involved in DNA replication and to analyze the different strategies that couple DNA replication to other critical events in the cell cycle. In this review, we focus on replication and its control in circular plasmids. Plasmid replication can be conveniently divided into three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination. The inability of DNA polymerases to initiate de novo replication makes necessary the independent generation of a primer. This is solved, in circular plasmids, by two main strategies: (i) opening of the strands followed by RNA priming (theta and strand displacement replication) or (ii) cleavage of one of the DNA strands to generate a 3'-OH end (rolling-circle replication). Initiation is catalyzed most frequently by one or a few plasmid-encoded initiation proteins that recognize plasmid-specific DNA sequences and determine the point from which replication starts (the origin of replication). In some cases, these proteins also participate directly in the generation of the primer. These initiators can also play the role of pilot proteins that guide the assembly of the host replisome at the plasmid origin. Elongation of plasmid replication is carried out basically by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (and, in some cases, by DNA polymerase I at an early stage), with the participation of other host proteins that form the replisome. Termination of replication has specific requirements and implications for reinitiation, studies of which have started. The initiation stage plays an additional role: it is the stage at which mechanisms controlling replication operate. The objective of this control is to maintain a fixed concentration of plasmid molecules in a growing bacterial population (duplication of the plasmid pool paced with duplication of the bacterial population). The molecules involved directly in this control can be (i) RNA (antisense RNA), (ii) DNA sequences (iterons), or (iii) antisense RNA and proteins acting in concert. The control elements maintain an average frequency of one plasmid replication per plasmid copy per cell cycle and can "sense" and correct deviations from this average. Most of the current knowledge on plasmid replication and its control is based on the results of analyses performed with pure cultures under steady-state growth conditions. This knowledge sets important parameters needed to understand the maintenance of these genetic elements in mixed populations and under environmental conditions.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Stimulation of human papillomavirus type 1a DNA replication by a multimerized AT-rich palindromic sequence.

Replication of most papillomaviruses requires the viral E1 and E2 proteins and an origin of replication containing the E1 and E2 binding sites. In the case of human papillomavirus type 1a (HPV-1a), the E1 protein alone is sufficient for DNA replication although the E2 protein significantly stimulates replication. We have further analyzed the role of cis-acting sequences and the E1 and E2 proteins in HPV-1a replication. Previous studies have shown that a 60-bp region lacking the E2 binding sites but containing an imperfect 16-bp AT-rich palindrome corresponding to the putative E1 binding site contains the minimal origin of replication (ori). Using a transient replication assay, we demonstrate that duplication of this 60-bp region causes a severalfold increase in replication. Synthetic oligonucleotides containing a 39-bp region centered around the above palindromic sequence supported only low-level replication in the presence of either E1 alone or both E1 and E2, but replication was significantly increased in the presence of multiple copies of this sequence. Plasmids containing a 19-bp sequence which includes the AT-rich palindrome failed to replicate, but multiple copies of this region supported replication in the presence of both E1 and E2 to significant levels. The results presented indicate that the HPV-1a E1 protein is capable of recruiting all the cellular factors required for replication. Our results also suggest that multimerization of the AT-rich palindromic sequence may result in a significant increase in the recruitment of the E1 protein to the origin, thereby stimulating replication. This increased targeting of the E1 protein to the origin containing multiple copies of the putative E1 binding site may be functionally similar to the targeting of E1 to the origin by E2.

Adenine↗
PubMed2004

Spatial and temporal organization of adeno-associated virus DNA replication in live cells.

Upon cell entry, the genomes of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and adenovirus (Ad) associate with distinct nuclear structures termed ND10 or promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear bodies (NBs). PML NB morphology is altered or disrupted by specific viral proteins as replication proceeds. We examined whether adeno-associated virus (AAV) replication compartments also associate with PML NBs, and whether modification or disruption of these by HSV-1 or Ad, both of which are helper viruses for AAV, is necessary at all. Furthermore, to add a fourth dimension to our present view of AAV replication, we established an assay that allows visualization of AAV replication in live cells. A recombinant AAV containing 40 lac repressor binding sites between the AAV inverted terminal repeats was constructed. AAV Rep protein and helper virus-mediated replication of this recombinant AAV genome was visualized by binding of enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-lac repressor fusion protein to double-stranded AAV replication intermediates. We demonstrate in live cells that AAV DNA replication occurs in compartments which colocalize with AAV Rep. Early after infection, the replication compartments were small and varied in numbers from 2 to more than 40 per cell nucleus. Within 4 to 8 h, individual small replication compartments expanded and fused to larger structures which filled out much of the cell nucleus. We also show that AAV replication compartments can associate with modified PML NBs in Ad-infected cells. In wild-type HSV-1-infected cells, AAV replication compartments and PML NBs did not coexist, presumably because PML was completely disrupted by the HSV-1 ICP0 protein. However, alteration or disruption of PML appears not to be a prerequisite for AAV replication, as the formation of replication compartments was normal when the ICP0 mutants HSV-1 dl1403 and HSV-1 FXE, which do not affect PML NBs, were used as the helper viruses; under these conditions, AAV replication compartments did not associate with PML NBs.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Replication of coliphage lambda DNA.

A general scheme of lambda phage and plasmid DNA replication in Escherichia coli is presented, and results of in vivo experiments from the authors' laboratory are superimposed. The initiator lambda O functions in the assembly of the replication complex (RC) at ori lambda, making it a stable component of this structure. ClpP/ClpX protease-specific action on lambda O does not affect the regulation of replication; it only degrades the surplus of synthesized lambda O. The initiator lambda O becomes protected from proteolysis at a distinct step of the pathway of RC assembly. The host DnaA initiator-regulated transcriptional activation of ori lambda seems to be coupled with RC assembly at the step of chaperone-mediated rearrangement of the pre-primosome. The once-assembled RC is inherited by one of two lambda plasmid daughter copies at each round of circle-to-circle (theta) replication. The inherited, old RC-driven replication is also dependent on RNA polymerase and DnaA functions. It seems that DnaA licenses lambda plasmid DNA for only one replication round, resembling the putative eukaryotic licensing factor in this respect. The lambda O binding to ori lambda does not seem to play any role in regulation of lambda plasmid replication, and the Cro-autoregulatory loop may be deleted. The emerging picture shows lambda plasmid circles with RCs bound to their ori, awaiting a signal triggering initiation of replication. The host DnaA initiator-regulated transcriptional activation of ori lambda may be involved in signal transmission. Inactivation of DnaA function blocks initiation of lambda phage DNA replication, but the lambdoid prophage Rac compensates this defect and all parental phage DNA molecules, after one round of theta replication switch to the sigma mode and produce progeny in high yield. We suspect that DnaA-regulated transcriptional activation is involved in installation and adequate positioning of two RCs, required for bidirectional replication, but in the Rac-promoted process only one RC may be installed, leading to unidirectional replication continued in the sigma mode. In wild-type cells consumption of DnaA function by the rapidly replicating lambda phage DNA may switch replication from bidirectional theta to unidirectional theta, and later to the sigma mode; the lambda circles produced earlier may play the role of Rac, which is required only when DnaA function has been inactivated prior to phage infection.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed1994

In vitro replication of adeno-associated virus DNA.

The study of eukaryotic viral DNA replication in vitro has led to the identification of cellular enzymes involved in DNA replication. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is distinct from previously reported systems in that it is believed to replicate entirely by leading-strand DNA synthesis and requires coinfection with adenovirus to establish completely permissive replication. In previous work, we demonstrated that two of the AAV nonstructural proteins, Rep78 and -68, are site-specific endonucleases and DNA helicases that are capable of resolving covalently closed AAV termini, a key step in AAV DNA replication. We have now cloned the AAV nonstructural proteins Rep78, Rep68, and Rep52 in the baculovirus expression system. Using the baculovirus-expressed proteins, we have developed an efficient in vitro AAV DNA replication system which mimics the in vivo behavior of AAV in every respect. With no-end AAV DNA as the starting substrate, the reaction required an adenovirus-infected cell extract and the presence of either Rep78 or Rep68. Rep52, as expected, did not support DNA replication. A mutant in the AAV terminal resolution site (trs) was defective for DNA replication in the in vitro assay. Little, if any, product was formed in the absence of the adenovirus-infected HeLa cell extract. In general, uninfected HeLa extracts were less efficient in supporting AAV DNA replication than adenovirus-infected extracts. Thus, the requirement for adenovirus infection in vivo was partially duplicated in vitro. The reduced ability of uninfected HeLa extracts to support complete DNA replication was not due to a defect in terminal resolution but rather to a defect in the reinitiation reaction or in elongation. Rep78 produced a characteristic monomer-dimer pattern of replicative intermediates, but surprisingly, Rep68 produced little, if any, dimer replicative form. The reaction had a significant lag (30 min) before incorporation of 32P-deoxynucleoside triphosphate could be detected in DpnI-resistant monomer replicative form and was linear for at least 4 h after the lag. The rate of incorporation in the reaction was comparable to that in the simian virus 40 in vitro system. Replication of the complete AAV DNA molecule was demonstrated by the following criteria. (i) Most of the monomer and dimer product DNAs were completely resistant to digestion with DpnI. (ii) Virtually all of the starting substrate was converted to heavy-light or heavy-heavy product DNA in the presence of bromo-dUTP when examined on CsCl density gradients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Baculoviridae↗
PubMed1995

cis-Acting components of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA replication: linker substitution analysis of the HPV type 11 origin.

Papillomavirus DNA replication requires the viral trans-acting factors E1 and E2 in addition to the host cell's general replication machinery. The origins of DNA replication in bovine and human papillomavirus genomes have been localized to a specific part of the upstream regulatory region (URR) which includes recognition sites for E1 and E2 proteins. To fine map cis-acting elements influencing human papillomavirus type 11 (HPV-11) DNA replication and to determine the relative contributions of such sites, we engineered consecutive linker substitution mutations across a region of 158 bp in the HPV-11 origin and tested mutant origins for replication function in a cell-based transient replication assay. Our results both confirm and extend the findings of others. E2 binding sites are the major cis components of HPV-11 DNA replication, and there is evidence for synergy between these sites. Differential capacity of the three E2 binding sites within the origin to affect replication may be attributed, at least in part, to context. At least one E2 binding site is essential for replication. The imperfect AT-rich palindrome of the E1 helicase binding site is not essential since replication occurs even in the absence of this sequence. However, replication is enhanced by the presence of the palindromic sequence in the HPV-11 origin. Sequence components adjacent to the E1 and E2 binding sites, comprising AT-rich and purine-rich elements and the consensus TATA box sequence, probably contribute to the overall efficiency of replication, though they are nonessential. None of the other cis elements of the HPV-11 origin region analyzed seems to influence replication significantly in the system described. The HPV-11 origin of DNA replication therefore differs from those of the other papovaviruses, simian virus 40 and polyomavirus, inasmuch as an intact helicase binding site and adjacent AT-rich components, while influential, are not absolutely essential.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

DNA replication of human papillomavirus type 31 is modulated by elements of the upstream regulatory region that lie 5' of the minimal origin.

The viral replication factors E1 and E2 of papillomaviruses are necessary and sufficient to replicate plasmids containing the minimal origin of DNA replication in transient assays. Under physiological conditions, the upstream regulatory region (URR) governs expression of the early viral genes. To determine the effect of URR elements on E1 and E2 expression specifically, and on the regulation of DNA replication during the various phases of the viral life cycle, we carried out a systematic replication study with entire genomes of human papillomavirus type 31 (HPV31), a high-risk oncogenic type. We constructed a series of URR deletions, spacer replacements, and point mutations to analyze the role of the keratinocyte enhancer (KE) element, the auxiliary enhancer (AE) domain, and the L1-proximal end of the URR (5'-URR domain) in DNA replication during establishment, maintenance, and vegetative viral DNA amplification. Using transient and stable replication assays, we demonstrate that the KE and AE are necessary for efficient E1 and E2 gene expression and that the KE can also directly modulate viral replication. KE-mediated activation of replication is dependent on the position and orientation of the element. Mutation of either one of the four Ap1 sites, the single Sp1 site, or the binding site for the uncharacterized footprint factor 1 reduced replication efficiency through decreased expression of E1 and E2. Furthermore, the 5'-URR domain and the Oct1 DNA binding site are dispensable for viral replication, since such HPV31 mutants are able to replicate efficiently in a transient assay, maintain a stable copy number over several cell generations, and amplify viral DNA under vegetative conditions. Interestingly, deletion of the 5'-URR domain leads to increased transient and stable replication levels. These findings suggest that elements in the HPV31 URR outside the minimal origin modulate viral replication through both direct and indirect mechanisms.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2000

A dominant-negative herpesvirus protein inhibits intranuclear targeting of viral proteins: effects on DNA replication and late gene expression.

The d105 dominant-negative mutant form of the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) single-stranded DNA-binding protein, ICP8 (d105 ICP8), inhibits wild-type viral replication, and it blocks both viral DNA replication and late gene transcription, although to different degrees (M. Gao and D. M. Knipe, J. Virol. 65:2666-2675, 1991; Y. M. Chen and D. M. Knipe, Virology 221:281-290, 1996). We demonstrate here that this protein is also capable of preventing the formation of intranuclear prereplicative sites and replication compartments during HSV infection. We defined three patterns of ICP8 localization using indirect immunofluorescence staining of HSV-1-infected cells: large replication compartments, small compartments, and no specific intranuclear localization of ICP8. Cells that form large replication compartments replicate viral DNA and express late genes. Cells that form small replication compartments replicate viral DNA but do not express late genes, while cells without viral replication compartments are incapable of both DNA replication and late gene expression. The d105 ICP8 protein blocks formation of prereplicative sites and large replication compartments in 80% of infected cells and formation of large replication compartments in the remaining 20% of infected cells. The phenotype of d105 suggests a correlation between formation of large replication compartments and late gene expression and a role for intranuclear rearrangement of viral DNA and bound proteins in activation of late gene transcription. Thus, these results provide evidence for specialized machinery for late gene expression within replication compartments.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Characterization of a semi-replicative gene delivery system allowing propagation of complementary defective retroviral vectors.

BACKGROUND: Recently, several cancer gene therapy studies have shown that replication-competent retroviral vectors represent a major improvement over replication-defective ones in terms of transgene propagation efficiency. However, this positive effect is somewhat spoiled by the increased risk of dissemination and oncogenesis that replication-competent retroviral vectors entail. To enhance both their integral safety and their transgene capacity, we developed a semi-replication-competent retroviral vector system. METHODS: The semi-replication-competent retroviral vector system is based on two transcomplementing replication-defective retroviral vectors termed gag-pol vector (GPv) and env vector (Ev). Vector propagation was monitored in vitro and in solid tumors in vivo, using different reporter transgenes for GPv and Ev. Systemic vector dissemination and leukemogenesis was assessed by direct intravenous vector injection and subsequent bone marrow transplantation, in MLV-sensitive mice. RESULTS: In vitro and in vivo the semi-replication-competent retroviral vectors propagate transgenes almost as efficiently as replication-competent ones. The semi-replication-competent retroviral vector system does not lead to detectable dissemination or leukemogenesis as does the replication-competent vector or the parental virus. Additionally, the vector duo allows co-propagation of different transgenes as well as mobilization of a third replication-defective vector. CONCLUSIONS: This study is an initial proof of principle for the use of complementary retroviral vectors to deliver and propagate transgenes in vitro and in solid tumors in vivo, but with reduced pathogenicity compared to its parental virus. In-between replication-defective and replication-competent retroviral vectors, this semi-replicative system offers good grounds for its application in in vitro studies and allows envisioning its further development for cancer gene therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Origins of replication and gene regulation.

Eukaryotic chromosomes appear to consist of many replicons, the time of replication of which is probably controlled by specific origins. However, plasmids without specific eukaryotic origins may also replicate in some cells when injected into nuclei or transferred during transformation. The efficiency and the mechanisms of their initiation are still uncertain. A number of reports are cited which indicate that natural eukaryotic DNAs initiate their replication from specific origins. The nature of these origins are known in only a few instances and no general conclusions can yet be given about the nucleotide sequences involved. Short dispersed repeats of the Alu type appear to function as origins since they enhance the efficiency of replication of vector plasmids in Xenopus eggs. Certain sequences from a variety of eukaryotic DNAs also enhance the replicative potential of plasmids in yeast cells. The common features of such initiators or enhancers is uncertain. If dispersed repeats are origins in mammalian chromosomes, the number appears to be excessive. Either only a subset are functional, or the functional ones are only suborigins in larger replicons in which master origins (not yet isolated) function in the regulation of the timing of replication. Evidence is cited which indicates that the regulation of the time of replication of a gene or gene cluster is part of a regulatory system that makes the DNA available for transcription or leaves it in an inactive state. About one-half the DNA in mammalian cells is replicated in the first half of S phase (SE). After a brief pause in mid-S phase, the remainder of the DNA is replicated in what is designated late S (SL). The fractions replicated in SE and SL may vary in other phylogenetic groups, but wherever division of differentiated cells occurs such fractions are likely to be found. The following hypothesis is proposed. The DNA replicated in SL is suppressed in transcription, if it has the appropriate promoter regions, because the newly replicated DNA is complexed with proteins that suppress transcription. These proteins are only available during SL. Those genes replicated in SE are complexed with a different set of proteins which leave the promoter regions open for transcription when the appropriate regulatory molecules are available. In this way an inactive state or potentially active state can be transmitted from one cell generation to the next. Evidence is cited which indicates that genes which are active in all cells at some stage in the cell cycle are replicated in SE.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗