Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

The cost effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV/AIDS.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate survival, the number of life-years gained and cost effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens, denoted as ERA-I [zidovudine + (didanosine or zalcitabine)]; ERA-II [stavudine + (didanosine or zalcitabine) or lamivudine + (zidovudine or didanosine or zalcitabine or stavudine)]; and ERA-III [2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors + (1 protease inhibitor or 1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor)]. DESIGN: Modelling of drug cost, cost of opportunistic diseases and survival of HIV positive men and women in the province of British Columbia who were first prescribed any ART between October 1992 and June 1996. A 'reference cohort' was modelled upon individuals in a longitudinal cohort of homosexual men followed since 1982. PERSPECTIVE AND SETTING: Third-party payer perspective in British Columbia, Canada. PATIENTS: All HIV-positive men and women aged > or =18 years with CD4+ counts < or =350 cells/microL who were enrolled in the province-wide drug treatment programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual costs, survival and cost-effectiveness ratios of successive ART regimens. RESULTS: Total costs [1997 Canadian dollars ($Can)] at 12 months under ERA-I, -II and -III were $Can4897, $Can6620 and $Can 11 914, respectively. Survival at 12 months under ERA-I, -II and -III was 89.6%, 91.0% and 97.6%, respectively. The annual incremental cost (estimated by the total incremental cost at 12 months) between ERA-II and ERA-I was $Can1723. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between ERA-III and ERA-I, and between ERA-III and ERA-II were $Can58 806 and $Can46 971 per life-year gained, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found the cost effectiveness of ERA-III ART regimens well within the range of currently funded therapies for the treatment of other chronic diseases.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2000

[Antiretroviral therapy. Update at the beginning of a new century].

For antiretroviral therapy (ART) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), protease inhibitors (PI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) are available, and are used in combination treatments. The use of PI is associated with new side effects, in particular affecting lipid metabolism. The objective of treatment continues to be a maximum reduction of the viral load. The question whether to treat the HIV early on or later is under controversial discussion. Simplified therapeutic regimens making possible single or twice-daily doses and the use of small numbers of tablets represent a major advance in ART.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2006

Long-term results of initial therapy with abacavir and Lamivudine combined with Efavirenz, Amprenavir/Ritonavir, or Stavudine.

OBJECTIVE: To compare alternative class-sparing antiretroviral regimens in treatment-naive subjects. DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of up to 3 consecutive treatment regimens over 96 weeks. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-one subjects received abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine and efavirenz (nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]), ritonavir-boosted amprenavir (protease inhibitor [PI]), or stavudine (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI]) by random assignment. The primary end points were the percentages of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL and time to treatment failure over 96 weeks. RESULTS: Ninety percent of subjects completed 96 weeks of follow-up, and 79% remained on study treatment. At week 96, there were no differences between arms in the percentages of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 and <50 copies/mL, mean changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, time to treatment failure, time to first or second virologic failure, or CD4 cell counts. The NNRTI arm had a greater percentages of subjects with RNA levels <or=50 copies/mL at weeks 24 and 48 and a greater overall duration of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL. Three subjects in the NNRTI arm had treatment failure on their first regimen and switched therapy compared with 16 in the NRTI arm and 13 in the PI arm. Twenty-one subjects had hypersensitivity reactions attributed to ABC (7.3%). Fewer drugs were used by subjects in the NNRTI arm, and fewer subjects in the NNRTI arm used 3 drug classes. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment regimens demonstrated excellent 96-week results. Secondary analyses favored the NNRTI regimen over the PI and NRTI regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Managing issues related to antiretroviral therapy.

Antiretroviral regimens are complicated and difficult for patients to follow, and they can have serious side effects, such as osteonecrosis and bone demineralization. Protease inhibitor therapy has been associated with hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal symptoms, and body-fat distribution abnormalities. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors can cause rashes and hepatotoxicity, and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors can cause lactic acidosis, hypersensitivity reactions, neuropathies, pancreatitis, anemia, and neutropenia. Malabsorption can occur if antiretroviral agents are taken improperly with regard to meals or if they are taken with certain other drugs or herbal remedies. Some commonly prescribed drugs can cause dangerous drug toxicities if they are taken by patients who are also taking certain antiretroviral medications. Suboptimal exposure to antiretrovirals because of noncompliance or malabsorption can result in viral resistance and loss of future treatment options.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2004

New antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV infection.

Issues, such as complexity, tolerability, and drug resistance and cross-resistance, limit the effectiveness of current antiretroviral regimens and make the continued development of newer agents important, despite the availability of 20 approved drugs for the treatment of HIV infection. Many new compounds are in development in existing classes: nucleoside and nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (eg, D-d4FC and SPD754), non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (eg, capravirine and TMC125), and protease inhibitors (eg, tipranavir and TMC114). In addition, newer classes of antiretroviral drugs, such as HIV entry inhibitors (eg, TNX-355, SCH 417690, UK-427,857, AMD 11070), that target the first step in the HIV life cycle are under development. Continued improvement in the treatment of HIV infection will result from the availability of convenient, well-tolerated, and affordable drugs with potent and durable antiretroviral activity.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2004

Mitochondrial dysfunction in AIDS and its treatment.

Advances in anti-retroviral therapy (ART) has led to improved survival of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). ART for HIV patients is composed of a combination of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and/or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and/or a protease inhibitor (PI). The long-term exposure to ART and HIV are causing mitochondrial toxicities, such as myopathies, neuropathy, myelopoiesis, pancreatitis, lactic acidosis, hepatic steatosis, and lipodystrophy. The mitochondrial pathogenesis has been believed to be due exclusively to NRTI-induced inhibition of DNA polymerase-gamma; it is now apparent that the etiology is far more complex, involving multiple mechanisms as well as an effect by HIV per se. Current therapy for patients includes interruption or change in medications and mitochondrial co-factors.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Mortality and causes of death in adults receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in Senegal: a 7-year cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate survival and investigate causes of death among HIV-1 infected adults receiving HAART in Senegal. DESIGN: An observational prospective cohort. METHODS: Mortality was assessed in the first patients enrolled between August 1998 and April 2002 in the Senegalese antiretroviral drug access initiative. First-line regimen combined two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor. The most likely causes of death were ascertained through medical records or post-mortem interviews (verbal autopsy). RESULTS: Four hundred and four patients (54.7% women) were enrolled in the study and were followed for a median of 46 months (interquartile range: 32-57 months) after HAART initiation. At baseline, 5% were antiretroviral therapy (ART) non-naive, 39 and 55% were respectively at CDC stage B and C, median age, CD4 cell count and viral load were 37 years, 128 cells/microl and 5.2 log cp/ml, respectively. Ninety-three patients died during follow-up and the overall incidence rate of death was 6.3/100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.2-7.7]. During the first year after HAART initiation, 47 patients died and seven were lost to follow-up, yielding to a probability of dying of 11.7% (95% CI, 8.9-15.3%). The death rate, which was highest during the first year after HAART initiation, decreased with time yielding a cumulative probability of dying of 17.4% (95% CI, 13.9-21.5%) and 24.6% (95% CI, 20.4-29.4%) at 2 and 5 years. Causes of death were ascertained in 76 deaths. Mycobacterial infections, neurotropic infections and septicaemia were the most frequent likely causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the early mortality pattern after HAART initiation and highlights the leading role of mycobacterial infections in the causes of death.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2006

Rapid propagation of low-fitness drug-resistant mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by a streptococcal metabolite sparsomycin.

Here we report that sparsomycin, a streptococcal metabolite, enhances the replication of HIV-1 in multiple human T cell lines at a concentration of 400 nM. In addition to wild-type HIV-1, sparsomycin also accelerated the replication of low-fitness, drug-resistant mutants carrying either D30N or L90M within HIV-1 protease, which are frequently found mutations in HIV-1-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Of particular interest was that replication enhancement appeared profound when HIV-1 such as the L90M-carrying mutant displayed relatively slower replication kinetics. The presence of sparsomycin did not immediately select the fast-replicating HIV-1 mutants in culture. In addition, sparsomycin did not alter the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of antiretroviral drugs directed against HIV-1 including nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (lamivudine and stavudine), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapine) and protease inhibitors (nelfinavir, amprenavir and indinavir). The IC50s of both zidovudine and lopinavir against multidrug resistant HIV-1 in the presence of sparsomycin were similar to those in the absence of sparsomycin. The frameshift reporter assay and Western blot analysis revealed that the replication-boosting effect was partly due to the sparsomycin's ability to increase the -1 frameshift efficiency required to produce the Gag-Pol transcript. In conclusion, the use of sparsomycin should be able to facilitate the drug resistance profiling of the clinical isolates and the study on the low-fitness viruses.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed2005

[Revised guideline "Antiretroviral Treatment"].

In the revised guideline 'Antiretroviral treatment' produced by the Dutch Society of Aids-Treating Physicians and the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement (CBO), the following major changes have been made to the 2000 guideline. Treatment of adult HIV-infected patients should start when the number of CD4 cells remains consistent at >200 cells x 10(6)/l. Antiretroviral therapy is recommended when CD4-cell levels are 200-350 cells x 10(6)/l and HIV-RNA load is higher than 100,000 copies/ml. In therapy-naive adults combinations of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus 1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and combinations of 2 NRTIs plus 1 protease inhibitor are equally effective; NNRTIs are preferable to protease inhibitors due to their relatively easy dosage regimen. In order to optimize individual dosage regimens, plasma drug levels should be measured at 4 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment in therapy-naive patients. Patients with pre-existing disturbances of lipid metabolism or familial hypercholesterolaemia should not receive protease inhibitors as therapy of first choice. Genotyping is indicated in virological failure and before the start of initial therapy in patients infected in Europe and the United States of America. In order to prevent HIV transmission from mother to child, all pregnant HIV-infected women (also if their HIV-RNA load is undetectable) should receive HIV treatment starting in the 24th week of gestation. Children of HIV-seropositive mothers should be treated with antiretrovirals for 4 weeks after birth. In co-infected patients, the choice of anti-hepatitis B drugs should be determined by whether or not there is also an indication for HIV treatment. Treatment for tuberculosis should preferably be initiated 1-2 months prior to the start of HIV treatment in co-infected patients. Following an occupational needlestick accident or unprotected-sex event, post-exposure prophylaxis should be offered due to the increased risk of HIV transmission.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Nevirapine plus efavirenz plus didanosine: a simple, safe, and effective once-daily regimen for patients with HIV infection.

Conventional highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection typically use nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and either a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Because PI-based regimens are associated with significant long-term toxicity and adherence difficulty, there is a need for novel regimens that maximize combination treatment options. This 12-month, observational, cohort study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel three-drug HAART regimen. Drug treatment consisted of nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV), and didanosine (ddl). Twenty-six treatment-naive and -experienced HIV-1+ men and women were included in the study. Assessment consisted of CD4+ cell count, plasma HIV-1 RNA load, and adverse effects of study medications. After one year of therapy, 11/12 treatment-naive subjects (92%) and 8/9 treatment-experienced subjects (89%) had viral loads < 400 copies/mL. Both groups also had an excellent immune response. At one year, there was a mean increase of 438 CD4+ cells/mm3 among treatment-naive subjects and 367 cells/mm3 among treatment-experienced subjects. Treatment-limiting adverse effects occurred in 3/15 treatment-naive (20%) and 2/11 treatment-experienced (18%) subjects. These preliminary data suggest that the combination of NVP, EFV, and ddl is simple, safe, and effective.

Alkynes↗
PubMed2000

Safety, tolerability, and antiretroviral effects of ritonavir-nelfinavir combination therapy administered for 48 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and anti-HIV activity of ritonavir-nelfinavir (RTV-NFV). DESIGN: Single-site, open-label, nonrandomized, multiple-dose trial of RTV combined with two doses of NFV in protease inhibitor (PI)-naive, HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Mean baseline HIV RNA was 39,500 copies/ml; mean baseline CD4 count was 323 cells/mm3. All patients received RTV at a dosage of 400 mg twice daily. Cohorts I (N = 10) and II (N = 10) received NFV at a dosage of 500 mg and 750 mg twice daily, respectively, for the initial 12 weeks of the study before allowing intensification with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. RESULTS: The commonest effects of RTV-NFV therapy were study drug-related moderate-to-severe diarrhea (9 patients in cohorts I and II) and drug-related moderate-to-severe nausea (4 patients in cohorts I and II). HIV RNA was suppressed in a biphasic manner. At 48 weeks in cohort I, mean HIV RNA reduction was 2.82 log10 copies/ml (standard error [SE] =.61; p =.001; N = 4); mean CD4 cell count increase was 236 cells/mm3 (SE = 67.1; p =.006; N = 4). In cohort II, mean HIV RNA reduction at Week 48 was 2.21 log10 copies/ml (SE =.430; p =. 001; N = 8); mean CD4 cell count increase was 120 cells/mm3 (SE = 47. 5; p =.03; n = 8). In cohort I patients, 2 of 4 completing Week 48 had HIV RNA <20 copies/ml; and 3 of 4 had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. In cohort II, 2 of 8 patients completing Week 48 had HIV RNA <20 copies/ml and 4 of 8 had HIV RNA <400 copies/ml. In addition, 3 patients in cohort I withdrew because of virologic failure not thought to be related to poor compliance. Moreover, 15 patients elected to add new reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) after week 12. CONCLUSIONS: RTV-NFV with concomitant reverse transcriptase inhibitors is a potential dual-PI option for PI-naive patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Nelfinavir. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Nelfinavir is a selective inhibitor of HIV protease, the enzyme responsible for post-translational processing of HIV propeptides. In the presence of the drug, immature, noninfectious virus particles are produced. Nelfinavir in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors profoundly suppresses viral replication. Plasma HIV RNA levels (viral loan) rapidly fall below the limit of detection (LOD; usually 400 or 500 copies/ml in the majority of patients. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250mg twice daily produced similar results to 3-times-daily nelfinavir at a range of total daily dosages. In an ongoing study > 70% of adults receiving a nelfinavir based combination regimen had plasma HIV RNA levels below the LOD (< 400 copies/ml) after 84 weeks. In addition, 73% of paediatric patients receiving nelfinavir plus at least 1 new NRTI had viral loads below the LOD (< 400 copies/ml) after 34 weeks. Furthermore, CD4+ cell counts generally increased in conjunction with reductions in viral load. Combination therapy with nelfinavir and saquinavir results in higher saquinavir plasma concentrations, make twice-daily administration of saquinavir feasible and may delay the emergence of resistant viral strains. A unique mutation at codon 30 (D30N) of the protease gene confers resistance to nelfinavir, but HIV with D30N mutation remains fully susceptible to indinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir in vitro. Nonetheless, in clinical use, significant cross-resistance is seen with all currently available protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy and has been reported in up to 32% of nelfinavir recipients in randomised trials. Diarrhoea is generally of mild to moderate severity and does not result in weight loss. Rash, nausea, headache and asthenia were each reported in < or = 5% of patients. Approximately 5% of patients enrolled in an expanded access programme in the US discontinued nelfinavir because of adverse events. Nelfinavir is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system. Several clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions between nelfinavir and other drugs (i.e. ketoconazole, rifabutin, rifabutin, rifampicin), including other protease inhibitors (i.e. indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir) have been documented. As with other available protease inhibitors, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia and abnormal fat distribution have been reported, albeit infrequently, in association with nelfinavir. CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir-based combination regimens are well tolerated and produce profound and prolonged suppression of HIV replication in adult and paediatric patients. Hence, nelfinavir is suitable for inclusion in antiretroviral regimens for initial therapy for HIV infection and, alternatively, in regimens for patients unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Therapeutic drug monitoring and the inhibitory quotient of antiretroviral drugs: can they be applied to the current situation?

Therapeutic drug monitoring is attracting growing interest as a means of increasing the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy and of decreasing its toxicity, although data supporting this strategy are still scarce. Currently, nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NARTI) are not candidates because their effect depends on their active intracellular form and not on plasma concentration. Protease inhibitors (PI) and non-nucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNARTI) meet the criteria for therapeutic drug monitoring. The main limitations are that the parameters to be monitored in order to measure exposure to the drug and the effective concentration of the drug have not been well defined. The few studies performed in treatment-naive patients have demonstrated that monitoring improves therapeutic efficacy. This strategy will be particularly useful when the risk of subtherapeutic or toxic concentrations is especially high (pharmacokinetic interactions, intestinal malabsorption, adverse effects, virological failure without obvious cause, pregnancy, children). Although it remains to be standardized, the inhibitory quotient integrates pharmacological and virological parameters and is useful in patients with prior virological failure. Any therapeutic drug monitoring program should be accompanied by measures to monitor and improve treatment adherence. There are good reasons to believe that therapeutic drug monitoring can be useful to improve treatment in specific circumstances. However, before its widespread use as a routine method can be recommended, the parameters to be used should be standardized and studies with appropriate methodology should be performed to define the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in distinct clinical situations.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

Triple-nucleoside regimens versus efavirenz-containing regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: Regimens containing three nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors offer an alternative to regimens containing nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors for the initial treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, but data from direct comparisons are limited. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study involved three antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of subjects infected with HIV-1: zidovudine-lamivudine-abacavir, zidovudine-lamivudine plus efavirenz, and zidovudine-lamivudine-abacavir plus efavirenz. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 1147 subjects with a mean baseline HIV-1 RNA level of 4.85 log10 (71,434) copies per milliliter and a mean CD4 cell count of 238 per cubic millimeter were enrolled. A scheduled review by the data and safety monitoring board with the use of prespecified stopping boundaries led to a recommendation to stop the triple-nucleoside group and to present the results in the triple-nucleoside group in comparison with pooled data from the efavirenz groups. After a median follow-up of 32 weeks, 82 of 382 subjects in the triple-nucleoside group (21 percent) and 85 of 765 of those in the combined efavirenz groups (11 percent) had virologic failure; the time to virologic failure was significantly shorter in the triple-nucleoside group (P<0.001). This difference was observed regardless of the pretreatment HIV-1 RNA stratum (at least 100,000 copies per milliliter or below this level; P< or =0.001 for both comparisons). Changes in the CD4 cell count and the incidence of grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection, the triple-nucleoside combination of abacavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine was virologically inferior to a regimen containing efavirenz and two or three nucleosides.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A randomized study of emtricitabine and lamivudine in stably suppressed patients with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Once daily (QD) dosing facilitates regimen simplification and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Emtricitabine (FTC) QD is a newly approved nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor compared in this study to twice daily lamivudine (3TC BID). METHODS: Controlled, open label equivalence trial of 440 HIV-1-infected patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA stably suppressed on a regimen of 3TC 150 mg BID, stavudine or zidovudine, and a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Patients were randomized to continue their current regimen or replace 3TC with FTC 200 mg QD. If HIV-1 RNA levels were </= pound 400 copies/ml at 48 weeks in Protocol 303, patients could continue on FTC in Protocol 350. The primary analysis was based on virologic failure and response defined by plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression below 400 copies/ml. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean CD4 cell count was 525 (FTC) and 533 x 10(6) cells/l (3TC). At week 48 in Protocol 303, the probability of virologic failure was low, 7% (FTC) and 8% (3TC), and the probability of sustained viral suppression at week 48 was equivalent between treatment arms at both the 50 and 400 copies/ml thresholds. The mean increase in CD4+ T-cell percentage was 2.5% (FTC) and 1.7% (3TC). In Protocol 350, the probability of virologic failure was 11% after 4 years on FTC-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). CONCLUSION: In stably suppressed patients, 200 mg emtricitabine QD was equivalent to 150 mg lamivudine BID. Emtricitabine-containing HAART was associated with a high rate of sustained virologic suppression during 4 years of follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ T cells and viral load of children with AIDS: a population-based study.

In this study, we sought to characterize the changes over time at the population level on CD4(+) T cells and plasma viral load (VL) levels of HIV-1-infected children with or without AIDS. We carried out a retrospective study in 114 HIV-infected children during the calendar period that a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) protocol was used. The HAART protocol consisted of three drugs: nucleoside analogue HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and/or HIV protease inhibitors, and/or nonnucleoside analogue HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The mean of CD4(+) T cells percentage and log(10) VL per calendar year were stratified by AIDS diagnostic. As new HAART strategies become available, an increase of CD4(+) T cells and a decrease of VL were observed over time, in children with and without AIDS. In 2001, children with AIDS reached values of CD4(+) T cells and VL similar to children without AIDS. In conclusion, our study shows that the generalized use of HAART has permitted improvement in immunological and virological status of HIV-infected children without AIDS, and more importantly in children with AIDS.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
PubMed2005

The TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database: baseline and retrospective data.

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known regarding HIV disease natural history and response to antiretroviral treatments among Asian people infected with HIV. The Therapeutics Research, Education, and AIDS Training in Asia (TREAT Asia) HIV Observational Database (TAHOD) is a recently established collaborative observational cohort study that aims to assess HIV disease natural history in treated and untreated patients in the Asia-Pacific region. METHODS: Observational data are collected on HIV-infected patients from 11 sites in the Asia-Pacific region. Data are centrally aggregated for analyses, with the first baseline and retrospective data transferred in September 2003. Retrospective data were analyzed to assess the response to highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) over a 6-month period in terms of changes in CD4 count and proportions of patients achieving an undetectable HIV viral load (<400 copies/mL). RESULTS: By the end of May 2004, 1887 patients had been recruited to the TAHOD. Seventy-two percent of patients were male, with median age 36 years. Seventy-eight percent of patients reported HIV infection through heterosexual contact. Forty-three percent of patients had a previous AIDS diagnosis, of whom 55% had tuberculosis. The mean 6-month CD4 count increase was 115 cells/muL (SD=127) after starting triple-combination therapy. Smaller CD4 count increases were associated with a higher CD4 count before starting treatment, prior treatment with monotherapy or double therapy, and treatment with a HAART regimen containing a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and/or protease inhibitor (PI) but without a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Five hundred and ninety-eight patients started HAART and had a viral load assessment at 6 months, with 69% attaining an undetectable viral load. Older patients, patients not exposed to HIV through heterosexual contact, and patients treated with HAART containing NRTIs and NNRTIs but without PIs were found to be more likely to achieve an undetectable level. CONCLUSION: Analyses of retrospective data in the TAHOD suggest that the overall response to HAART in Asian populations is similar to that seen in Western countries.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Chronic hyperlactatemia in HIV-infected patients taking antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, course and risk factors for hyperlactatemia in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: A prospective, longitudinal study of venous lactate concentrations over an 18-month period in 349 participants of the Western Australian HIV Cohort Study. RESULTS: In 516 patient-years of observation, two patients experienced severe fulminant lactic acidosis (lactate > 5 mmol/l) and hepatic steatosis attributable to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). A further five patients with lesser elevations of lactate (2.8-4.1 mmol/l) but with symptoms of nausea or abdominal discomfort and evidence of hepatic steatosis had NRTI therapy revised, with relief of symptoms and a fall in lactate levels. Most remaining patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had mild, chronic, asymptomatic hyperlactatemia, with mean lactate level between 1.5 mmol/l and 3.5 mmol/l most commonly. Longitudinal data was analysed in a non-linear mixed effects growth model which indicated that average lactate levels rose after the start of HAART but tended to stabilise at low-grade elevation, with an average 0.23 mmol/l greater long term level in stavudine users compared with zidovudine users (p < 0.01). A multiple linear regression model showed that the association between stavudine and higher lactate level was not confounded by longer duration of total NRTI exposure. Risk of hyperlactatemia was not significantly associated with use of other NRTIs, protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors or multiple immunological and virological factors in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic, compensated, asymptomatic hyperlactatemia is common in patients taking HAART. Decompensated, life-threatening lactic acidosis/hepatic steatosis is rare. Treatment with stavudine appears to be the predominant risk factor for development of chronic hyperlactatemia.

Acidosis, Lactic↗