Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Molecular manipulation of G-protein-coupled receptors: a new avenue into drug discovery.

During the past 10 years or so, associated with the introduction of molecular biology techniques to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research, outstanding progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of action of these key proteins and their physiological functions. in-vivo manipulation of levels of GPCRs using transgenic and gene knock-out approaches have been particularly successful in assessing the roles of specific GPCRs in animal physiology. Drug discovery is aiming to produce highly specific compounds based on subtle definition of receptor subtypes which can best be studied using heterologous expression of wild type or mutated forms of cDNA or genes encoding these proteins. Furthermore, new therapeutic opportunities may be provided by investigation of orphan receptors, the natural ligands for which remain unidentified. Some human diseases have been shown to be associated with rare mutations of GPCRs and the possibility that widely distributed polymorphisms in GPCR genes may allow selective therapeutic strategies for population subgroups is driving the development of the science of pharmacogenetics.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Receptor tyrosine kinases are signaling intermediates of G protein-coupled receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can utilize receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) to mediate important cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation and survival. Recent advances in the field suggest that GPCR-induced transactivation of RTKs might be important for diseases such as cancer and cardiac hypertrophy. Depending on the receptor and cell type, GPCR signaling involves activation of several different RTKs. By activating different subsets of RTKs, GPCRs can fine-tune their effects on target cells. Furthermore, RTK-independent signaling pathways also initiated by GPCRs may modify the biological read out of the transactivated RTKs. This review focuses on the mechanisms how GPCRs and intracellular messengers elicit transactivation of different RTKs and the resulting different biological responses.

Cell Communication↗
PubMed2004

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest receptor superfamily in the human genome and represent the most common targets of drug action. Classic agonist and antagonist ligands that act at GPCRs tend to bind to the receptor's orthosteric site, that is, the site recognized by the endogenous agonist for that receptor. However, it is now evident that GPCRs possess additional, extracellular, allosteric binding sites that can be recognized by a variety of small molecule modulator ligands. Allosteric modulators offer many advantages over classic orthosteric ligands as therapeutic agents, including the potential for greater GPCR-subtype selectivity and safety. However, the manifestations of allosterism at GPCRs are many and varied and, in the past, traditional screening methods have generally failed to detect many allosteric modulators. More recently, there have been a number of major advances in high throughput screening, including the advent of cell-based functional assays, which have led to the discovery of more allosteric modulator ligands than previously appreciated. In addition, a number of powerful analytical techniques have also been developed exclusively for detecting and quantifying allosteric effects, based on an increased awareness of various mechanisms underlying allosteric modulator actions at GPCRs. Together, these advances promise to change the current paucity of GPCR allosteric modulators in the clinical setting and yield novel therapeutic entities for the treatment of numerous disorders.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed2006

A role for information collection, management, and integration in structure-function studies of G-protein coupled receptors.

Elucidation of protein function is greatly facilitated by the availability of an atomic resolution structure or a reliable molecular model. The difficulty of obtaining atomic resolution structures of membrane proteins in general, and of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in particular, has made the information available from sequence analysis, mutagenesis, and the literature on related GPCRs exceptionally important. Here, we review previous studies of GPCR structure-function from the perspectives of sequence analysis, management of mutagenesis and ligand binding data, and literature data mining. The knowledge derived from these information resources not only constitutes the prerequisites for reliable molecular modeling, but also can provide other insights into GPCR functions. Finally, we review approaches for information integration and applying knowledge discovery techniques to structure-function studies of GPCRs, including molecular modeling itself.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed2006

Co-ordinated covalent modification of G-protein coupled receptors.

The G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) gene family represents one of the largest families in the mammalian genome. The flexibility of signalling and widespread tissue distribution of these receptors has allowed GPCRs to be employed in the physiological regulation of nearly all biological functions. This, coupled with the fact that it is possible to chemically produce highly specific ligands to these receptors have made GPCRs attractive targets for pharmacological intervention in a wide variety of disease states. When targeting GPCRs in therapeutic drug design it is traditional, and eminently sensible, to focus on ligands that will provide agonism, antagonism or allosteric modulation. However, as more is understood of the mechanisms that regulate GPCRs, and in particular the dynamic covalent modifications that might endow tissue specific functions, then these regulatory processes may provide alternative targets for GPCR drug discovery. In this review we consider three of the covalent modifications which are considered to regulate the function of GPCRs namely; receptor phosphorylation, palmitoylation and ubiquitination. In particular, we will describe the mechanisms of modification, the functional consequences and the relationship between these three covalent modification events.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Discovery of novel regulatory peptides by reverse pharmacology: spotlight on chemerin and the RF-amide peptides metastin and QRFP.

Reverse pharmacology is a screening technology that matches G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with unknown cognate ligands in cell-based screening assays by detection of agonist-induced signaling pathways. One decade spent pursuing orphan GPCR screening by this technique assigned over 30 ligand/receptor pairs and revealed previously known or novel undescribed ligands, mostly of a peptidic nature. In this review, we describe the discovery, characterization of the structural composition, biological function, physiological role and therapeutic potential of three recently identified peptidic ligands. These are metastin, QRFP in a context of five RF-amide genes described in humans and the chemoattractant, chemerin. Metastin was initially characterized as a metastasis inhibitor. Investigations using ligand/receptor pairing revealed that metastin was involved in a variety of physiological processes, including endocrine function during pregnancy and gonad development. The novel RF-amide QRFP is implicated in food intake and aldosterone release from the adrenal cortex in the rat. Chemerin, first described as TIG2, is upregulated in tazarotene-treated psoriatic skin. By GPCR screening, bioactive chemerin was isolated from ovarial carcinoma fluid as well as hemofiltrate. Characterization as a chemoattractant for immature dendritic cells and analysis of the expression profile of metastin and its receptor suggested a physiological role of chemerin as a mediator of the immune response, inflammatory processes and bone development.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Virally encoded G protein-coupled receptors: targets for potentially innovative anti-viral drug development.

Various herpes- and poxviruses contain DNA sequences encoding proteins with homology to cellular chemokine receptors, which belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Since GPCRs play a crucial role in cellular communication and chemokine receptors play a prominent role in the immune system, the virally encoded GPCRs may be crucial determinants of viral action. The Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV, or human herpesvirus 8), implicated in the pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), a highly vascularized tumor, encodes a GPCR, referred to as ORF74. This virally encoded receptor was found to induce tumorigenesis and transgenic expression of ORF74 induces an angioproliferative disease resembling KS. Cytomegalovirus (CMV), suggested to play a role in atherosclerosis, encodes four GPCRs, among which US28. This virally encoded GPCR is able to induce migration of smooth muscle cells, a feature essential for the development of atherosclerosis. Remarkably, the KSHV and some CMV-encoded GPCRs display constitutive activity, while their cellular homologs do not. It remains to be determined whether this phenomenon contributes to the pathogenesis of viral action. Also, the family of poxviruses encodes GPCRs of which the function is not clear yet. In this review we will give an overview of the different virally encoded GPCRs, and discuss their putative role in viral action and potential as drug target.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2002

Constitutively activated G protein-coupled receptors: a novel approach to CNS drug discovery.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major class of signal transduction proteins that modulate various biological functions. GPCRs are one of the most common targets for drug development-currently, 39 of the top 100 marketed drugs in use act directly or indirectly through activation or blockade of GPCR-mediated receptors. Nearly 160 GPCRs have been identified based on their gene sequence and their ability to interact with known endogenous ligands. However, an estimated 500-800 additional GPCRs have been classified as "orphan" receptors (oGPCRs) because their endogenous ligands have not yet been identified. Given that known GPCRs have proven to be such clinically useful drug targets, these oGPCRs represent a rich group of receptor targets for the development of novel and improved medicines. To develop ligands for these potential drug targets requires the ability to identify groups or pools of GPCRs that are likely to be involved in a specific disease process (obesity, schizophrenia, depression, etc.) and to dissect out the pharmacological and signal transduction differences between these GPCR subtypes. It also requires the development of assays to detect ligands of GPCRs even when the endogenous ligands are unidentified. This paper will review novel strategies to identify clinically interesting oGPCRs and to screen for small molecules that act as ligands without prior knowledge of endogenous ligands. This involves the use of constitutively activated GPCRs, a technology that provides a unique opportunity to identify several classes of pharmacological agents, including agonists, inverse agonists and allosteric modulators.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Emerging signalling and protein interactions mediated via metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGlu) are GTP-binding (G) protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are involved in learning and memory, cardiovascular control and motor function. Their structure and pharmacology has been reviewed recently in Current Drug Targets: CNS and Neurological Disorders (Vol. 1, Issue 3) where their roles in a variety of neurological disorders were highlighted. The present review focuses on the emerging evidence for interactions of mGlu receptors with other GPCRs in the CNS at the membrane interface and amongst signaling cascades in the cytosol (e.g. intracellular Ca(2+), cAMP and scaffolding proteins). While initially non-selective activity was thought to be responsible for many atypical responses, increasing evidence points to GPCR interactions in neurons and glia, with adrenoceptors, adenosine receptors, dopamine receptors and muscarinic receptors. For example, group II mGlu receptors were found to be required for group I mGlu receptor induction of long-term potentiation at the postsynaptic terminal. Increasing evidence demonstrates the intimate interaction of adenosine receptors and mGlu receptors, particularly in the regulation of neurotransmitter release. While adenosine itself can be released from astrocytes by co-activation of group II mGlu and beta-adrenergic receptors. Given the complexity of neurological disorders such as ischemic stroke, Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy, exploitation mGlu receptor-associated GPCR interactions may prove efficacious in the treatment of such disorders.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Gut hormones as peripheral anti obesity targets.

Many peptides are synthesised and released from the gastrointestinal tract. Whilst their roles in regulation of gastrointestinal function have been known for some time, it is now evident that they also influence eating behaviour and thus potential anti obesity targets. Peptide YY (PYY) is released post prandially from the gastrointestinal L-cells with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and oxyntomodulin. Following peripheral administration of PYY 3-36, the circulating form of PYY, to mouse, rat or human there is marked inhibition of food intake. PYY 3-36 is thought to mediate its actions through the NPY Y2 GPCR. Obese subjects have lower basal fasting PYY levels and have a smaller post prandial rise. However, obesity does not appear to be associated with resistance to PYY (as it is with leptin) and exogenous infusion of PYY 3-36 results in a reduction in food intake by 30% in an obese group and 31% in a lean group. GLP-1 or oxyntomodulin, products of the prepreglucagon gene, decrease food intake when administered either peripherally or directly into the CNS. In addition, both have been shown to decrease food intake in humans. These effects are thought to be mediated by the GLP-1 receptor. Ghrelin, a huger hormone produced by the stomach, increases in the circulation following a period of fasting. Administration of ghrelin either peripherally or directly into the CNS increases food intake and chronic administration leads to obesity. Further infusion into normal healthy volunteers increases both food intake and appetite. Ghrelin is thought to act through the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R). Obesity is the current major cause of premature death in the UK, killing almost 1000 people a week. Worldwide its prevalence is accelerating. The administration of the naturally occurring gut hormone may offer a long-term therapeutic approach to weight control. Here we consider the therapeutic potential of some gut hormones, and the GPCR's through which they act, in the treatment of obesity.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

G protein-coupled receptor structural motifs: relevance to the opioid receptors.

As a whole, the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily displays no overall sequence homology. Nevertheless, enough short sequences and even individual amino acid residues are shared by these receptors to afford a common three-dimensional structure and a similar signal transduction mechanism. Some of these sequence commonalities, or structural motifs, are dedicated to preserving receptor infrastructure, while others are critical to agonist-mediated signaling. Certain structural motifs common to GPCRs and other signal transducing integral membrane proteins are present in the conventional opioid receptors, although several of the motifs are not well characterized in this receptor family. Here we focus on six structural motifs found in the mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors as well as the opioid like receptor ORL-1. The motifs are discussed in terms of their dynamic roles in the signaling mechanism documented for several Class A GPCRs including the opioid receptors. Clarification of the roles of GPCR structural motifs provides a blueprint for structure-function studies on newly discovered or recently cloned receptors in the superfamily. Characterization of these motifs in the opioid receptors should enhance understanding of what makes an opioid ligand a full, partial or inverse agonist or antagonist at a given receptor, possibly leading to rational design of therapeutics useful for combating opiate dependence or for pain management.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Molecular modelling studies on G protein-coupled receptors: from sequence to structure?

In pharmaceutical research G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) emerged as a superfamily of prominent drug targets. Extensive protein sequence analyses on GPCRs revealed a common protein topology consisting of a membrane-spanning seven-helix bundle, which is believed to accommodate the binding site for low-molecular weight ligands. Enormous efforts are undertaken to generate GPCR structural models by means of molecular modelling, since these have already been shown to aid the process of lead structure finding and optimisation in that they provide atomistic models for structure-based drug design approaches. One of the most critical steps in modelling the transmembrane domains of GPCRs is the assignment of the putative transmembrane sequence stretches from multiple protein sequence alignment analyses. This study focuses on the comparative evaluation of protein sequence analysis tools, such as periodicity analyses, multiple sequence analyses or directional helix descriptors, especially developed for modelling the 7TM domains of GPCRs. In this context we will demonstrate that from application of different methods contradictory results can be obtained for the identification of the putative transmembrane sequence stretches of peptide-binding GPCRs, as exemplified with a comprehensive protein sequence analysis study based on the most prominent members of that receptor class (angiotensin II, CCK/gastrin, interleukin 8, endothelin, etc.).

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Molecular dynamics of a vasopressin V2 receptor in a phospholipid bilayer membrane.

Molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for a V2 receptor (V2R) model embedded in a dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) bilayer. Both free and ligand-bound states of V2R were modeled. Our initial V2R model was obtained using a rule-based automated method for GPCR modeling and refined using constrained simulated annealing in vacuo. The docking site of the native vasopressin ligand was selected and justified upon consideration of ligand-receptor interactions and structure-activity data. The primary purpose of this work was to investigate the usefulness of MD simulation of an integral membrane protein like a GPCR receptor, upon inclusion of a carefully parameterized surrounding lipid membrane and water. Physical properties of the system were evaluated and compared with the fully hydrated pure DMPC bilayer membrane. The solvation interactions, individual lipid-protein interaction and fluctuations of the protein, the lipid, and water were analyzed in detail. As expected, the membrane-spanning helices of the protein fluctuate less than the peripheral loops do. The protein appears to disturb the local lipid structure. Simulations were carried out using AMBER 4.1 package upon constant number-pressure-temperature (NPT) conditions on massively parallel computers Cray T3E and IBM SP2.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Adjuvant arthritis induces down-regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in the immune system.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) play a crucial role in the regulation of the immune response by, e.g., chemokines, PGs, and beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. The responsiveness of these GPCRs is turned off by the family of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK1-6). These kinases act by phosphorylating the GPCR in an agonist-dependent manner, resulting in homologous desensitization of the receptor. Although GRKs are widely expressed throughout the body, leukocytes express relatively high levels of GRKs, in particular GRK2, -3, and -6. We investigated whether in vivo the inflammatory disease adjuvant arthritis (AA) induces changes in GRK expression and function in the immune system. In addition, we analyzed whether the systemic effects of AA also involve changes in GRKs in nonimmune organs. At the peak of the inflammatory process, we observed a profound down-regulation of GRK2, -3, and -6 in splenocytes and mesenteric lymph node cells from AA rats. Interestingly, no changes in GRK were observed in thymocytes and in nonimmune organs such as heart and pituitary. During the remission phase of AA, GRK levels in spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes are returning to baseline levels. The decrease in GRK2 at the peak of AA is restricted to CD45RA(+) B cells and CD4(+) T cells, and was not observed in CD8(+) T cells. In conclusion, we demonstrate in this study, for the first time, that an inflammatory process in vivo induces a tissue-specific down-regulation of GRKs in the immune system.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Toll-like receptor signaling alters the expression of regulator of G protein signaling proteins in dendritic cells: implications for G protein-coupled receptor signaling.

Conserved structural motifs on pathogens trigger pattern recognition receptors present on APCs such as dendritic cells (DCs). An important class of such receptors is the Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLR signaling triggers a cascade of events in DCs that includes modified chemokine and cytokine production, altered chemokine receptor expression, and changes in signaling through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). One mechanism by which TLR signaling could modify GPCR signaling is by altering the expression of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. In this study, we show that human monocyte-derived DCs constitutively express significant amounts of RGS2, RGS10, RGS14, RGS18, and RGS19, and much lower levels of RGS3 and RGS13. Engagement of TLR3 or TLR4 on monocyte-derived DCs induces RGS16 and RGS20, markedly increases RGS1 expression, and potently down-regulates RGS18 and RGS14 without modifying other RGS proteins. A similar pattern of Rgs protein expression occurred in immature bone marrow-derived mouse DCs stimulated to mature via TLR4 signaling. The changes in RGS18 and RGS1 expression are likely important for DC function, because both proteins inhibit G alpha(i)- and G alpha(q)-mediated signaling and can reduce CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)12-, CC chemokine ligand (CCL)19-, or CCL21-induced cell migration. Providing additional evidence, bone marrow-derived DCs from Rgs1(-/-) mice have a heightened migratory response to both CXCL12 and CCL19 when compared with similar DCs prepared from wild-type mice. These results indicate that the level and functional status of RGS proteins in DCs significantly impact their response to GPCR ligands such as chemokines.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Regulation of N-formyl peptide receptor signaling and trafficking by individual carboxyl-terminal serine and threonine residues.

Adaptation, defined as the diminution of receptor signaling in the presence of continued or repeated stimulation, is critical to cellular function. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) undergo multiple adaptive processes, including desensitization and internalization, through phosphorylation of cytoplasmic serine and threonine residues. However, the relative importance of individual and combined serine and threonine residues to these processes is not well understood. We examined this mechanism in the context of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a well-characterized member of the chemoattractant/chemokine family of GPCRs critical to neutrophil function. To evaluate the contributions of individual and combinatorial serine and threonine residues to internalization, desensitization, and arrestin2 binding, 30 mutant forms of the FPR, expressed in the human promyelocytic U937 cell line, were characterized. We found that residues Ser(328), Ser(332), and Ser(338) are individually critical, and indeed sufficient, for internalization, desensitization, and arrestin2 binding, but that the presence of neighboring threonine residues can inhibit these processes. Additionally, we observed no absolute correlation between arrestin binding and either internalization or desensitization, suggesting the existence of arrestin-independent mechanisms for these processes. Our results suggest C-terminal serine and threonine residues of the FPR represent a combinatorial code, capable of both positively and negatively regulating signaling and trafficking. This study is among the first detailed analyses of a complex regulatory site in a GPCR, and provides insight into GPCR regulatory mechanisms.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2002

G-protein alpha subunit isoforms couple differentially to receptors that mediate presynaptic inhibition at rat hippocampal synapses.

Presynaptic receptors that are coupled to heterotrimeric G-proteins are found throughout the brain and are responsible for modulating synaptic transmission. At least 10 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) reduce transmission in hippocampal neurons. Additionally, hippocampal neurons express up to 17 different Galpha, Gbeta, and Ggamma subunits, making for a striking array of possible heterotrimer compositions and GPCR-heterotrimer interactions. The identity of the Galpha subunit is likely a critical determinant in coupling specificity between GPCRs and their molecular effectors mediating presynaptic inhibition. We studied the role of four Galpha(i/o) subunits (Galpha(o1), Galpha(i1,) Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3)) in mediating presynaptic inhibition in hippocampal neurons by expressing pertussis toxin-insensitive (PTx-ins) Galpha(i/o) mutants. PTx treatment of these cells disrupts coupling of endogenous subunits, leaving only the mutant Galpha subunits to couple with native GPCRs and betagamma subunits. Successful rescue of presynaptic inhibition indicates that the expressed mutant Galpha subunit can couple to the GPCR of interest. All four PTx-ins Galpha subunits rescued presynaptic inhibition by adenosine A1 receptors. A PTx-ins Galpha subunit also rescued adenosine A1-mediated inhibition of spontaneous vesicle fusion frequency. Of the remaining GPCRs tested, cannabinoid CB1, somatostatin, and GABA(B) receptors displayed an alpha subunit-dependent selectivity in binding to G-protein heterotrimers, whereas group III metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated inhibition was not rescued by expression of any of the four PTx-ins Galpha subunits. Differential coupling of G-protein alpha subunits may be a means of achieving specificity between different GPCRs and their molecular targets for mediating presynaptic inhibition.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Involvement of a putative G-protein-coupled receptor and a branching pathway in argipressin (4-8) signal transduction in rat hippocampus.

AIM: To study the signal transduction pathway induced by argipressin (4-8) (AVP4-8) in rat hippocampus. METHODS: Rat hippocampi were sectioned transversely at 300 microns with a tissue chopper and transferred to fresh incubation solution circulated with a humidified gas mixture of 95% O2 + 5% CO2 at 36 +/- 0.5 degrees C. After incubation with various drugs, MAP kinase (MAPK) activity and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) autophosphorylation were measured. RESULTS: The main findings are: (1) The AVP4-8-stimulated MAPK activity and the CaMKII autophosphorylation were blocked by ZDC(C)PR, an antagonist of AVP4-8, and also completely inhibited by pertussis toxin, a selective inhibitor of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). But, AVP-induced MAPK activation was not sensitive to ZDC(C)PR or PTX. (2) Polymyxin B (PMB), an inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), markedly suppressed the peptide-activation of MAPK, but did not affect CaMKII autophosphorylation. Phorbol myristate acetate (TPA), an activator of PKC, elicited an increase of MAPK activity, but did not further influence the level of AVP4-8-enhanced MAPK activity; Nevertheless, the extent of CaMKII activation was attenuated by TPA. (3) The enhancement of MAPK activity was not reduced by KN-62, a specific inhibitor of CaMKII. (4) AVP4-8 did not show any influence on cAMP production. CONCLUSION: AVP4-8 stimulated signal transduction via a GPCR and a branching pathway in rat hippocampus.

Animals↗