Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ASTHENIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. A phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is an active drug in head and neck cancer. Paclitaxel seems a promising drug. This article reports a phase II assessment of the combination of the two. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients were treated with paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 over three hours plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every other week. Sixteen patients had locoregional disease and seven had metastatic disease. None of the patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy. Nine patients had had radiotherapy to the target lesions. RESULTS: One patient was not evaluable for response. Partial responses were observed in 32% of evaluable patients. Toxicity included asthenia (56%), neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, anemia and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: The overall response rate observed in this study does not seem to justify the use of this chemotherapy regimen in the palliative setting.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Clinical phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel as single agent has shown marked activity in several malignancies. The aim of the present phase II trial was to determine the activity of paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel was administered over three hours followed by cisplatin (100 mg/m2), repeated every 22 days. Twenty-eight patients were entered and received a total of 99 cycles (median 2, range 1-6). All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 25 for response. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicities included leukopenia CTC grade 3 in 13 patients, and grade 4 in five patients, neutropenia grade 3 in nine patients, and grade 4 in eight patients, grade 3 anemia and grade 2 thrombocytopenia in one patient each. Non-hematologic toxicities included hypotension grade 2 (six patients), grade 3 (four patients), and grade 4 (two patients). A decline in renal function was observed in 15 courses and 10 patients, leading to a median delay of 2.5 days. Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity grade 1 were observed in 13 patients (grade 2: 12 patients; grade 3: one patient), myalgia grade 3 in one patient, asthenia grade 3 in two and grade 4 in one patient. Partial responses were observed in 12 patients for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI: 28%-68%) with a median response duration of 6.5 months (range 1-10 months). Stable disease was observed in seven patients, of who two also had clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered over three hours combined with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 is an active regimen warranting further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with monthly docetaxel and weekly gemcitabine: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active against chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monthly docetaxel combined with weekly gemcitabine in NSCLC patients failing one prior regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled. Prior chemotherapy was a platinum-based combination in 36 patients, using vinorelbine in 26 patients and etoposide in 10 patients. The other four patients had prior single agents. Tumors were refractory or resistant to front-line therapy in 80% of patients. Treatment was gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1, with cycles repeated every four weeks. RESULTS: Thirteen patients responded (32.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19%-49%), including one complete and 12 partial responses. Responses were observed at all metastatic sites, with similar response frequencies in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant/refractory tumors. The median time to progression for responders was nine months, with two responses lasting longer than a year. Median survival was 8.1 months. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 23 patients, with 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 9 patients, and anemia requiring red cell transfusions in 9 patients. With the exception of asthenia, severe non-hematologic toxicities were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly docetaxel, combined with weekly gemcitabine, is an active and safe second-line therapy for NSCLC patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Moderate dose-escalation of combination chemotherapy with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: prolonged intrathoracic tumor control and high central nervous system relapse rate. Groupe d'Oncologie-Pneumologie Clinique de l'Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels and Liège, Belgium.

BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy dose-intensification in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase I-II study evaluates feasibility and outcome of combination chemotherapy at moderately elevated doses with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Moderately elevated doses of ifosfamide-epirubicin (cycles 1 and 3) and of carboplatin-etoposide (cycles 2 and 4) were given with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. Thoracic radiotherapy (40 Gy) was given once daily during the first five days of each cycle. RESULTS: Overall toxicity was acceptable; most common side-effects were myelosuppression and asthenia. All 35 eligible patients responded (23 CR, 12 PR). Median time to progression was 15 months: median overall survival was 24.6 months. Only 6 of 25 relapsing patients (24%) presented with a locoregional recurrence while 12 of 25 (48%) relapsed in the central nervous system (CNS). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is a feasible dose-intensification with an acceptable toxicity profile. Its efficacy was demonstrated by a 100% response rate, an excellent local tumor control rate and a median survival of 24.6 months. In the absence of PCI, CNS relapse is a major problem if adequate local control is achieved.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with a combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a phase II study of the Greek Cooperative Group for Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of front-line docetaxel plus gemcitabine treatment in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) on day 8, every three weeks; rh-G-CSF (150 ig/m2 s.c.) was given prophylactically on days 9-15. RESULTS: Seven (13%) patients achieved partial response and 18 (33%) stable disease (intent-to-treat). The median duration of response was 24 weeks, time to tumour progression 32 weeks, and overall survival 26 weeks. Performance status was improved in 33% of patients, pain in 43%, asthenia in 16%, weight gain in 28% and appetite in 27%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 17 (31%) patients and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in four (4%). Six (11%) patients developed febrile neutropenia and one of them died from sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This combination is a relatively well-tolerated out-patient regimen for patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, phase II trial, 33 patients with previously untreated stage IIIB (n = 8) or IV (n = 25) NSCLC received intravenous infusions of docetaxel 80 mg/m2 followed immediately by carboplatin dosed to AUC of 6 mg/ml/min (Calvert's formula) every three weeks. Patients also received dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for three days beginning one day before each docetaxel treatment. Filgrastim was not allowed during the first cycle and was added only if a patient experienced febrile neutropenia or grade 4 neutropenia lasting > or = 7 days. RESULTS: There were 1 complete and 11 partial responses for an objective response rate of 43% (95% CI: 24%-63%) in 28 evaluable patients and 36% (95% CI: 20%-55%) in the intent-to-treat population. The median duration of response was 5.5 months (range 3.0-12.5 months). The median survival was 13.9 months (range 1-35+ months); one-year survival was 52%. The most common toxicity was hematologic, which included grade 4 neutropenia (79% of patients and 7% percent of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (15% of patients); there were no episodes of grade 3 or 4 infection. The most common severe nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia (24%) and myalgia (12%); there were no grade 3 or 4 neurologic effects. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin has an acceptable toxicity profile and is active in the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This combination is being evaluated in a randomized phase III trial involving patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Daily times four vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of a novel schedule.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel multiday schedule of vinorelbine and displatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled, including 27 patients with stage IV disease, and 11 patients with performance status of 2. They received a maximum of four chemotherapy cycles with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2/day intravenously (i.v.) for four consecutive days, every three weeks, with prophylactic filgrastim. RESULTS: Sixteen patients responded (53%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 34%-72%), including two complete and fourteen partial confirmed responses. Median survival for all patients was 8.1 months, with actuarial one-year and two-year survival rates of 40% and 15%. Despite prophylactic filgrastim, the delivered vinorelbine dose intensity of 16.8 mg/m2/week caused febrile neutropenia in 48% of patients (16% of cycles), resulting in one treatment-related death. Common nonhematologic toxicities included delayed emesis, asthenia, and constipation. CONCLUSIONS: This multiday vinorelbine-cisplatin schedule is highly active against advanced NSCLC but results in frequent neutropenic complications. The myelotoxicity and antitumor efficacy of vinorelbine in NSCLC patients may be schedule-dependent.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in women 60 years of age or older.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with advanced breast cancer are less likely to receive chemotherapy than younger patients. Vinorelbine is an attractive alternative in this setting because of its clinical activity and low frequency of side effects. This multicenter, phase II trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous vinorelbine as first-line therapy in women > or = 60 years old. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six women (median age, 72 years; range 60-84 years), with measurable advanced breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were enrolled and included in the analysis. Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 was administered weekly for 13 weeks and then every two weeks until development of progressive disease; doses were reduced or delayed to manage toxicity. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 38% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 24%-51%); median duration of response, nine months; median time to disease progression in all patients, six months. The major dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic, which led to a median dose intensity of 20.6 mg/m2/week. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of asthenia (7%); nausea and generalized pain (5%); vomiting, chest pain, abdominal pain, and elevated AST (4%); fever, diarrhea, constipation, and injection site reaction (2%). Neurotoxicity and alopecia were grade 1-2 and relatively infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine offers a promising alternative for the management of advanced breast cancer in elderly patients who are concerned about the subjective side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The dose-limiting toxicity is neutropenia, which is readily managed with dose adjustment. Nonhematologic toxicity, including gastrointestinal side effects, is minimal. Randomized studies are warranted to compare the activity of vinorelbine with that of other regimens in elderly patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Activity and toxicity of GI147211 in breast, colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer patients: an EORTC-ECSG phase II clinical study.

BACKGROUND: GI147211 is a water-soluble synthetic analogue of camptothecin showing promising in vivo and in vitro antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1995 and November 1996, 67 eligible patients with pretreated breast cancer (25 patients) and chemo-naïve colorectal (19 patients) and non-small-cell lung cancer (23 patients) were entered into three multicentric, non-randomized phase II trials. Treatment schedule consisted of intravenous GI1147211 administered at a dose of 1.2 mg/m2/day for five consecutive days every three weeks. RESULTS: Hematological toxicity was common with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 54% of patients and neutropenic fever together or not associated with infection in 14.5% of patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2-4 anemia were observed in 20% and in 68% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity was generally mild to moderate and consisted mainly of gastrointestinal toxicity, asthenia and alopecia. A dose-escalation to 1.5 mg/m2/d was feasible in 17 (25%) patients. The antitumor activity of GI1147211 was moderate in breast cancer patients (3 partial responses (PRs), response rate (RR) 13%) and minimal in non-small cell lung cancer patients (2 PRs, RR 9%). No objective responses were obtained in colorectal patients. CONCLUSIONS: GI147211, at the dose and schedule employed in this study, showed an acceptable safety profile but a modest antitumor activity in the examined tumor types.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A phase II study of weekly docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel has shown some activity in advanced gastric cancer. Recent phase I studies found low hematologic toxicity and a favourable toxicity profile when docetaxel was administered on a weekly schedule. In this study, we explored the activity of weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer who failed first-line chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stable or progressing disease after first-line chemotherapy received 36 mg/m2 weekly docetaxel. One cycle consisted of six administrations followed by a two-weeks rest, patients were re-evaluated at week eight. The optimal two-stage design was adopted for early stopping of the trial if responses were one or less in 21 patients (< 20% response rate with alpha and beta error probabilities 0.05 and 0.010 respectively). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients have been enrolled and they are fully evaluable for response and toxicity. One patient achieved partial response, 8 patients had stable disease and 12 patients progressed. Median overall survival from the onset of salvage chemotherapy was 3.5 months. Hematologic toxicity was observed in two patients who experienced grade III leukopenia. Beginning from the third week of treatment, most of the patients (90%) showed grade II asthenia which resulted the commonest side-effect. CONCLUSIONS: This schedule of weekly docetaxel did not show significant activity in pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Clinical and pharmacologic phase I study of Cemadotin-HCl (LU103793), a novel antimitotic peptide, given as 24-hour infusion in patients with advanced cancer. A study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO) Phase I Group and Arbeitsgruppe Pharmakologie in der Onkologie und Haematologie (APOH) Group of the German Cancer Society.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD), principal toxicity, and pharmacologic behaviour of Cemadotin-HCl, a novel antimitotic peptide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cemadotin-HCl (10.0 to 27.5 mg/m2/day every three weeks) was administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) continuous infusion to patients with advanced cancer. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed during the first treatment cycle. Blood samples were taken over 48 hours and analyzed by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Hypertension was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). This type of toxicity was observed at all dose levels, but grade 3 (CTC) was observed only at dose levels 20.0, 25.0 and 27.5 mg/m2. This effect was reversible but in three patients associated with signs of cardiac ischemia. Other significant toxic effects were neutropenia, asthenia, tumor pain and transient liver enzyme elevation. A linear pharmacokinetics was observed. The best curve fit was obtained with a two-compartment model with a terminal half-life of approximately 10 hours at each dose level, a volume of distribution at steady state of approximately 9 l/m2 and a total clearance of approximately 0.6 l/hour/m2. Neither partial nor complete responses were observed although minor tumor regressions were seen in a patient with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) and in another patient with liver metastases from a colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension was the dose-limiting toxicity of Cemadotin-HCl administered as a continuous 24-hour infusion. The recommended dose for further evaluation of its anticancer efficacy in disease-oriented phase II studies with this schedule is 15.0 mg/m2. The nature of the principal cardiovascular toxicity remains unclear. The observed toxicities appeared to be significant but manageable.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

An EORTC-ECSG phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine is an active drug in the treatment of lung and breast cancers and has a favorable toxicity profile. Many clinical trials have demonstrated its antitumor activity in other tumor types including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, previously untreated by chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2/week i.v. by short-duration infusion on an out-patient basis. Doses were adjusted according to tolerance. RESULTS: Two complete and seven partial responses were observed among 56 evaluable patients, yielding a response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-28%). The overall response rate of all eligible patients (63) was 14%. The responses were seen in recurrent tumors, lymph nodes and in lung metastases, and their median duration was 19 weeks (12-63). The main toxicity, severe and reversible neutropenia (grade 3-4) occurred in 53% of the 69 evaluable (for toxicity) patients. Twelve patients developed severe bronchopulmonary infections, which caused two early deaths. Constipation was observed in 31 patients (45%). Other gastrointestinal toxicities, asthenia, acute pain syndrome and peripheral sensory neuropathy, were mild to moderate. The median number of treatments was seven cycles and the median relative dose intensity of vinorelbine was 85% (25.5 mg/m2/week). CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine is an active drug, with acceptable toxicity, in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, at the dose and schedule administered in the present study. Further evaluation in association with other agents and/or radiotherapy is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of first-line high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the adult: a study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

BACKGROUND: The agent Ifosfamide (IFOS) is active against soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and patients who progress to IFOS at doses < or = 10 g/m2 show remissions when exposed to high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) (i.e., doses > 10 g/m2), which supports a dose-response relationship for this drug. Because of a lack of first-line studies in adult STS patients, we decided to test the activity and toxicity of HDI in a phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. IFOS was administered at a dose of 14 g/m2 by continuous infusion over six days every four weeks. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) at 5 micrograms/kg/day for 10 consecutive days was systematically administered after an episode of neutropenic fever or a delay in hematologic recovery. Patients were treated until progression or the occurrence of severe toxicity, and surgical rescue was attempted when possible. RESULTS: Six pathology-established complete remissions and 11 partial remissions were observed in 45 assessable patients with a response rate of 37.7% (95% CI: 25.5%-50%). Grade 3-4 toxicity (% of cycles) was noted by hemoglobin (17%), leukocyte (75%), granulocyte (75%) and platelet (13%) counts in 158 evaluable cycles. GM-CSF was administered to 28 patients, and 25 suffered one or more episodes of neutropenic fever. Renal toxicity was mild and reversible with some degree of tubular and glomerular dysfunction detected in up to 60% of patients. Grade 3 CNS toxicity was observed in 32% of patients but only one required interruption of therapy. Sixty-four per cent of the patients had asthenia grade 2-3 and 20% were excluded from the study due to excessive toxicity. There was one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: HDI is an active drug in first-line therapy against adult STS. Different administration schedules should be evaluated in an attempt to improve its therapeutic index.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Salvage treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after cisplatin- or docetaxel-based chemotherapy: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with measurable NSCLC (PS 0-1: 80%; stage IV: 84%) who progressed or failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prior chemotherapy was cisplatin-based with (n = 20) or without (n = 22) docetaxel and docetaxel-vinorelbine (n = 7). Patients received gemcitabine (900 mg/m2 i.v.; days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2; day 8) every three weeks: G-CSF (150 micrograms/m2/day s.c.; days 9-15) was given prophylactically to all patients. RESULTS: One (2%) complete and eight (16%) partial responses were achieved (overall response 18%; 95% CI: 4%-24%); 14 patients (29%) had stable disease and 26 (53%) progressive disease. Six responses were observed in 17 patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy. The median duration of response was seven months, the median TTP eight months and the median survival 11 months. The one-year survival rate was 37%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occured in six (12%) patients, grade 2-3 neurotoxicity in 16 (32%) and grade 2-3 asthenia in 25 (51%). Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination is a well-tolerated and relatively active salvage regimen in patients with NSCLC and it merits further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-etoposide as first-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous phase I-II studies have shown that the combination of paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide (TEP) is very active and well tolerated in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In order to compare the TEP combination to cisplatin etoposide (EP) regimen as front-line treatment in patients with SCLC, we conducted a randomised multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically proven limited or extensive stage SCLC were randomised to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. three-hour infusion on day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2-4 with G-CSF support (5 mcg/kg s.c. days 5-15) or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-3 in cycles every twenty-eight days. RESULTS: Due to excessive toxicity and mortality observed in the TEP arm, an early interim analysis was performed and the study was closed. Sixty-two patients received two hundred sixty-one cycles of TEP and seventy-one patients three hundred twenty-three cycles of EP The two patient groups were well balanced for age, sex, performance status, stage of disease and the presence of abnormal LDH at diagnosis. In an intention-to-treat overall analysis both regimens were equally active with a complete and partial response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval (CI): 37.5%-62.4%) for TEP and 48% (95%) CI: 36.2%-59.5%) for EP (P = 0.8). The median time to disease progression was 11 months for TEP and 9 months for EP (P = 0.02). The duration of response, one-year survival and overall survival were similar in the two arms. Similarly, in an intention-to-treat subgroup analysis of patients with limited or extensive stage disease, there was no difference in the activity between the two regimens except of a longer median time to disease progression in the extensive stage in favour of the TEP regimen, eight versus six months (P = 0.04). However, there were eight toxic deaths in the TEP arm versus none in the EP arm (P = 0.001). Moreover, the TEP regimen was associated with more severe toxicity than the EP regimen in terms of grade 4 neutropenia (P = 0.04), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (P = 0.02), febrile neutropenia (P = 0.08), grade 3-4 diarrhea (P = 0.01), grade 3-4 asthenia (P = 0.05) and grade 3 neurotoxicity (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In this early terminated study, the TEP regimen was significantly more toxic than the EP regimen. The TEP regimen is associated with significant toxicity and mortality, and should not be used outside of a protocol setting. For future investigations, dose and schedule modifications are necessary to reduce toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anthracycline-containing regimens are widely used in advanced breast cancer. However, there is a need for new, non-anthracycline regimens that are active in patients for whom anthracyclines are contraindicated. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended doses of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four women with first-line metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel, 60-100 mg/m2 (day 1), and vinorelbine, 20-22.5 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks and administered on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: Two MTDs were determined: MTD1 was defined at the dose level using docetaxel 75 mg/m2, and vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m2 DLT being a grade 3 stomatitis that was more related to the dose of vinorelbine than that of docetaxel. Therefore, the study continued with a fixed dose of vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2, and docetaxel 85-100 mg/m2. MTD2 was defined at the dose level combining docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2; DLTs were grade 3 stomatitis and severe asthenia. Fluid retention was observed in 41% of patients but was never severe or a reason for patient discontinuation. In comparison with historical experience, Daflon 500 did not seem to increase the efficacy of the three-day corticosteroid premedication by further reducing the incidence or severity of fluid retention. No significant neurotoxicity was observed and no patient discontinued the study due to this site effect. Activity was observed at all dose levels and at all metastatic sites, with an overall response rate of 71% (95% CI: 52.0%-85.8%). The median time to progression was 31.4 weeks (95% CI: 12-48 weeks) and median survival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-26.6 months). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and vinorelbine were not modified between day 1 and day 3 when the two drugs were combined with the day 1 administration schedule used in this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 (day 1), plus vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks. At these doses, the combination was found to be active and well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as front-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and tolerance of docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as front-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four previously untreated patients with MBC who had bidimensionally measurable disease were enrolled onto the study. Forty-eight (89%) patients had visceral metastases and nineteen (36%) had relapsed within twelve months following adjuvant chemotherapy. Docetaxel (100 mg/m2) was given on day 1 after appropriate premedication and mitoxantrone (20 mg/m2) on day 8. G-CSF (150 mcg/m2/d s.c.) was administered from day 2 to day 6 and from day 9 to day 15. The regimen was repeated every three weeks, on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 9 (17%) CRs, 24 (44%) PRs, (overall response rate 61%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 48.1%-74.1%), 12 (22%) SD and 9 (17%) PD were observed. The median duration of response and the median time to tumor progression was 12.5 and 14 months, respectively. The overall median survival was 16.5 months, whilst the probability for one- and three-year survival was 61% and 35%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37 (69%) patients, and febrile neutropenia in 16 (30%); there was one death due to sepsis. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in four (8%) patients. Grade 2-3 neurosensory toxicity was observed in 8 (15%) patients and grade 2-3 asthenia in 24 (45%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel in combination with mitoxantrone and G-CSF support is an intensified and active front-line regimen for patients with MBC; despite its hematological toxicity, this regimen merits further comparison with other standard anthracycline- and/or taxane-based combinations.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Second-line treatment with oxaliplatin + raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer failing fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with fluoropyrimidine leucovorin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within six months after withholding palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines leucovorin +/- irinotecan, participated in this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 both given on day 1 every three weeks for a total of eight courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate was 33.3% for all 36 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.6%-51%). Seventeen additional patients (47.2%) had stable disease, and only seven (19.5%) progressed. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range 1.2-14.0). After a median follow-up time of 12 months, 23 patients (63.8%) are still alive. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable with only 8 of 36 patients (22%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 non-haematological adverse reactions included peripheral sensory neuropathy in three, asthenia in one, diarrhea in two, and clinically insignificant increase in serum transaminases in two patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed has substantial antitumour activity in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine leucovorin + irinotecan pretreated colorectal cancer. Because of its favorable toxicity profile and convenient three-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Adult↗