[Experience with the programmed instruction of expertise in temporary loss of work capacity].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative effectiveness of lecture and self-instruction methods of instruction in a senior clinical laboratory science course. DESIGN: Posttest repeated measures design or within subject design. SETTING: The Department of Medical Technology in the School of Allied Health Professions, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical laboratory science students (27) enrolled in clinical parasitology agreed to participate, which was a sample of convenience. There were 16 females and 11 males; 70% Caucasian, 23% Asian, and 7% African-American. The 2 students who did not sign a consent form were excluded from the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were taught clinical parasitology course material by 2 different methods of instruction, lecture and self-instruction. All subjects received both treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Examination scores from each half of the course were compared using descriptive statistics and a paired t-test to determine the effectiveness of each instructional format. RESULTS: Results showed no statistically significant difference in learning outcomes between the 2 instructional formats (a = 0.05, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: The results of the study generally support the hypothesis that the self-instruction method is as effective as the lecture method in teaching clinical parasitology. By incorporating self-instruction into a clinical laboratory science curriculum, many hours of lecture can be eliminated, and students can learn the material at their own pace. Students comprehend the material effectively, and are relieved from some of the intensity of the didactic approach to instruction that dominates clinical laboratory science curricula.
We made a toolkit for making education softwares using 3D computer graphics, and using the toolkit, we made an education software based on 3D illustrations for learning about the human body. The toolkit enables us to make such kind of education software based on 3D illustrations easy and systematic. In the education software, the human body structure is illustrated with 3D models. The user can see the 3D objects with real-time rotation and walk through the virtual space, and their functions are expressed in the 3D virtual space.
The effectiveness of systematically designed print-based materials in teaching (a) knowledge of laboratory tests and (b) laboratory test skills to laboratory staff in small office practices was measured. Self-guided packets on Gram stain performance and interpretation, rapid streptococcal testing, and vaginal wet preparations were developed by a multidisciplinary team. A total of 21 staff members (14 treatment, 7 control) in 12 family practice offices with three or fewer physicians participated in the study. A posttest-only control group design was used to determine the effects of using the self-guided instructional packets. The treatment group, in relation to the control, scored significantly higher on tests of knowledge for all packets, demonstrated no difference in scores for Gram stain or streptococcal test skills, and scored significantly higher for identification of elements in photographs of vaginal wet preparations. Results affirmed both the usefulness and limitations of print-based instruction for knowledge level outcomes. For developing laboratory test skills additional forms of instruction are needed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.