Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HISTAMINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,027 records · Page 57Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Hippocampal somatostatin receptors and modulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in histamine-treated rats.

In the present study, the effects of an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) dose of histamine (0.1, 1.0 or 10.0 micrograms) on the hippocampal somatostatin (SS) receptor/effector system in Wistar rats were investigated. In view of the rapid onset of histamine action, the effects of histamine on the somatostatinergic system were studied 2 h after its administration. Hippocampal SS-like immunoreactivity (SSLI) levels were not modified by any of the histamine doses studied. SS-mediated inhibition of basal and forskolin (FK)-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity was markedly increased in hippocampal membranes from rats treated with 10 micrograms of histamine (23% +/- 1% vs. 17% +/- 1% and 37% +/- 2% vs. 23% +/- 1%, respectively). In contrast, neither the basal nor the FK-stimulated enzyme activities were affected by histamine administration. The functional activity of the hippocampal guanine-nucleotide binding inhibitory protein (Gi protein), as assessed by the capacity of the stable GTP analogue 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate (Gpp[NH]p) to inhibit FK-stimulated AC activity, was not modified by histamine administration. These data suggest that the increased response of the enzyme to SS was not related to an increased functional activity of Gi proteins. In fact, the increased AC response to SS in hippocampal membranes from histamine (10 micrograms)-treated rats was associated with quantitative changes in the SS receptors. Equilibrium binding data obtained with [125I]Tyr11-SS indicate an increase in the number with specific SS receptors (541 +/- 24 vs. 365 +/- 16 fmol/mg protein, P < 0.001) together with a decrease in their apparent affinity (0.57 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.03 nM, P < 0.05) in rat hippocampal membranes from histamine (10 micrograms)-treated rats as compared to control animals. With the aim of determining if these changes were related to histamine binding to its specific receptor sites, the histaminergic H1 and H2 receptor antagonists mepyramine and cimetidine, respectively, were administered 1 h before histamine injection. The pretreatment with mepyramine or cimetidine induced an increase in the number and affinity constant of the SS receptors whereas the simultaneous pretreatment with both histamine antagonists prevented the histamine-induced changes in SS binding to its receptors. Since the hippocampal SS receptor/effector system is modulated by histamine, it is tempting to speculate that in the hippocampus, SS could be involved as a mediator of the histamine effects on behaviors such as learning and memory.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2003

ECL cell histamine mobilization studied by gastric submucosal microdialysis in awake rats: methodological considerations.

The ECL cells are endocrine/paracrine cells in the acid-producing part of the stomach. They secrete histamine in response to circulating gastrin. Gastric submucosal microdialysis has been used to study ECL-cell histamine mobilization in awake rats. In the present study we assess the usefulness and limitations of the technique. Microdialysis probes were implanted in the gastric submucosa. Histological analysis of the stomach wall around the probe revealed a moderate, local inflammatory reaction 1-2 days after implantation; the inflammation persisted for at least 10 days. Experiments were conducted 3 days after the implantation. The "true" submucosal histamine concentration was determined by perfusing at different rates (the zero flow method) or with different concentrations of histamine at a constant rate (the no-net-flux method): in fasted rats it was calculated to be 87+/-5 (means+/-S.E.M.) nmol/l and 76+/-9 nmol/l, respectively. The corresponding histamine concentrations in fed rats were 93+/-5 and 102+/-8 nmol/l, respectively. With a perfusion rate of 74 microl/hr the recovery of submucosal histamine was 49%, at 34 microl/hr the recovery increased to 83%. At a perfusion rate below 20 microl/hr the microdialysate histamine concentration was close to the actual concentration in the submucosa. The ECL-cell histamine mobilization was independent of the concentrations of Ca2+ in the perfusion medium (0-3.4 mmol/l Ca2+). In one experiment, histamine mobilization in response to gastrin (10 nmol/kg/hr subcutaneously) was monitored in rats pretreated with prednisolone (60 mg/kg) or indomethacin (15 mg/kg). The two antiinflammatory agents failed to affect the concentration of histamine in the microdialysate either before or during the gastrin challenge, which was in accord with the observation that the inflammatory reaction was modest and that inflammatory cells were relatively few around the probe and in the wall of the probe. In another experiment, rats were given aminoguanidine (10 mg/kg) or metoprine (10 mg/kg) 4 hr before the start of gastrin infusion (5 nmol/kg/hr intravenously). Metoprine (inhibitor of histamine N-methyl transferase) did not affect the microdialysate histamine concentration, while aminoguanidine (inhibitor of diamine oxidase) raised both basal and gastrin-stimulated histamine concentrations. We conclude that microdialysis can be used to monitor changes in the concentration of histamine in the submucosa of the stomach, and that the inflammatory reaction to the probe is moderate and does not affect the submucosal histamine mobilization.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of mechanisms of IL-3 induced histamine release and IL-3 priming effect on human basophils.

We have investigated the mechanisms by which interleukin-3 (IL-3) induces histamine release and primes basophils for increased histamine release in response to anti-IgE- and N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP). The responsiveness of basophils from atopic donors was variable, only 5/11 subjects showing release of > 10%, to IL-3 in the range 0.1-100 ng/ml. IL-3-induced histamine release required both extracellular Ca2+ and cell membrane IgE, removal of membrane IgE by lactate stripping or desensitization of basophils by incubation with anti-IgE in a Ca2+-free medium blocking IL-3-induced histamine release. IL-3 also primed basophils for histamine release by anti-IgE and fMLP in the same concentration range as it evoked histamine release. When IL-3 and either anti-IgE or fMLP were combined, the result was additive or supra-additive depending on the basophil donor. Unlike IL-3-evoked histamine release, IL-3 priming of basophils for fMLP-induced histamine release was shown to be independent of the presence of both cell surface IgE and of extracellular calcium. The protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, staurosporine (10 nM), inhibited anti-IgE induced histamine release, but neither IL-3 induced histamine release nor IL-3 priming of IgE- and fMLP-induced histamine release. Pertussis toxin (1.0 microg/ml) inhibited fMLP-induced histamine release but not anti-IgE-induced histamine release, IL-3-evoked histamine release or IL-3 priming. These results indicate that IL-3 modulates mediator release from human basophils by two mechanisms; a direct release of histamine which involves cell surface IgE and the influx of extracellular calcium but which is unlikely to proceed by the same mechanism as cross-linkage of IgE, and a priming effect which is independent of IgE and extracellular Ca2+ and which enhances the secretory effects of a wide range of unrelated secretagogues.

Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic↗
PubMed2004

Central effect of histamine and peripheral effect of histidine on the formalin-induced pain response in mice.

1. The present study was designed to investigate the role of brain histamine in modulating pain transmission in mice. 2. In conscious mice implanted with an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) cannula, the effects of i.v.c. injections of normal saline (control) and low and high doses histamine (2 and 40 microg/mouse, respectively) were investigated on the duration of paw licking and biting induced by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of formalin (20 microL; 5%) into the plantar surface of the left hindpaw. 3. To clarify the involvement of histidine in the pain response, the effects of intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of low and high doses of histidine (50 and 1000 mg/kg, respectively) alone or before i.c.v. injection of histamine were also examined. 4. Intraplantar injection of formalin induced a biphasic pain response (first phase: 0-5 min after injection; second phase: 20-40 min after injection). 5. Histamine (2 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) had no effect on the first phase of the pain response, but suppressed the second phase. The higher dose of histamine (40 microg/mouse, i.c.v.) suppressed both phases of the pain response. 6. Histidine, at 50 mg/kg, i.p., had no effect on the pain response, but the higher dose (1000 mg/kg, i.p.) suppressed the both phases of the pain response. 7. Pretreatment with the low dose of histidine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to administration of 2 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine did not change the antinociception induced by low-dose histamine. However, pretreatment with the high dose of histidine (1000 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to 2 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine produced antinociception that resembled that seen following administration of the high dose of either histidine or histamine. Pretreatment with the low dose of histidine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to administration of 40 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine has no effect on the pain response following high-dose histamine. Pretreatment with 1000 mg/kg, i.p., histidine prior to administration of 40 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine strongly suppressed both phases of the formalin-induced pain response, particularly the second phase. 8. The results of the present study indicate that: (i) activation of brain histamine produces antinociception in the mouse formalin test; (ii) peripheral loading with a high dose of histidine (1000 mg/kg, i.p.) alone exerts the same effect as that seen following 40 microg/mouse, i.c.v., histamine; and (iii) pretreatment with a high dose of histidine potentiates central histamine-induced antinociception.

Animals↗
PubMed1974

Histamine metabolism of the gastric mucosa following antrectomy.

1. Histamine metabolism of the gastric mucosa in rats subjected to antrectomy, antrectomy and substitution with pentagastrin and exclusion of the antrum has been investigated employing various in vivo and in vitro methods.2. Mucosal histamine formation after antrectomy fell to about one third, whereas after antrum exclusion histamine formation increased many-fold.3. After antrectomy, mucosal histamine content decreased, and increased after antrum exclusion.4. After total gastrectomy, (a) whole-body histamine formation was reduced to about half, as judged by determining histamine excretion, and (b) pentagastrin infusion did not increase histamine excretion, showing absence of histamine mobilization from extra-gastric sources. In rats with the stomach retained, infusion of pentagastrin induced a dose-dependent increase in histamine excretion.5. Kinetic studies in which [(14)C]histidine was injected and the resulting urinary [(14)C]histamine determined showed that on pentagastrin infusion after antrectomy newly formed histamine was initially mobilized to a larger extent than in the controls.6. Antrectomized rats were subjected to substitution treatment by three injections per day of pentagastrin. After 3 weeks of substitution, histamine excretion was considerably higher than without substitution. After 6 weeks of substitution, histamine excretion was about the same in the substituted antrectomized, non-substituted antrectomized and sham-operated groups. Neither time nor substitution could, however, normalize the excretion of histamine on pentagastrin stimulation after antrectomy.7. In non-substituted antrectomized rats, pentagastrin was less effective in elevating mucosal histamine formation than in the substituted and sham-operated groups.8. The indispensability of the rat in this kind of study is emphasized.

Animals↗
PubMed1974

Absorption and catabolism of histamine in sheep.

1. The fate of dietary histamine in sheep has been studied. When 200 mg histamine diphosphate was administered into a rumen with normal contents the average time taken for the biological activity to disappear from the rumen was about 4 hr. In sheep starved for 60 hr the activity disappeared much more slowly.2. When 0.9% NaCl solution was substituted for the normal rumen contents and the rumen was isolated in situ under anaesthesia, the disappearance of histamine was scarcely detectable. About 1% of the radioactivity introduced into such rumen preparations as [(14)C]histamine was recovered in the urine during a 6 hr period.3. When both [(14)C]histamine and 200 mg unlabelled histamine diphosphate were administered into the rumen, between 4 and 15% of the radioactivity and 2 and 11% of the biological activity reached the duodenum.4. When jejunal loops isolated between two pairs of re-entrant cannulas were perfused with 0.9% NaCl solution containing histamine a considerable fraction of the histamine was absorbed from the loops.5. When [(14)C]histamine and 200 mg histamine diphosphate were administered into the rumen an average of 9% of the radioactivity appeared in the urine. When histamine was given into the abomasum the corresponding figure in a single experiment was 25%.6. Between 11 and 34% of the radioactivity administered into the rumen as [(14)C]histamine was exhaled as (14)CO(2). Most of the (14)CO(2) seemed to stem from metabolism of [(14)C]histamine in the ruminoreticulum whereas the contribution of the intestines to (14)CO(2) was very small.7. When [(3)H]histamine was administered into the rumen most of the radioactivity in the urine a few days after administration was in the form of tritiated water. The formation of (3)H(2)O is probably a result of histamine metabolism in the fore-stomach, analogous to the formation of (14)CO(2).

Abomasum↗
PubMed1993

Comparative nasal effects of bradykinin and histamine: influence on nasal airways resistance and plasma protein exudation.

BACKGROUND: Bradykinin may contribute to the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis. Like histamine, nasal challenge with bradykinin induces rhinorrhoea, nasal blockage, and plasma protein leakage. Their comparative nasal potencies have not, however, been fully elucidated. METHODS: Three double blind, randomised, placebo controlled and cross-over studies were undertaken to compare objectively the nasal effects of bradykinin, histamine, and vehicle. RESULTS: Both bradykinin and histamine produced dose dependent increases in nasal airways resistance (NAR). There was no significant difference in the effects of bradykinin and histamine on NAR at any dose level. On a molar basis, however, bradykinin was 6.98 times more potent than histamine in inducing a 50% increase in NAR. Nasal challenge with bradykinin and histamine also induced significant rhinorrhoea compared with vehicle. The amount of rhinorrhoea induced by histamine was significantly greater than that induced by bradykinin at any dose level. Bradykinin and histamine induced dose dependent nasal pain and nasal itch respectively. When administered as single doses both bradykinin (1.9 mumol) and histamine (1.9 mumol) induced significant rhinorrhoea compared with the vehicle. The volume of rhinorrhoea secretions induced by histamine was 29% greater than that induced by bradykinin. In contrast, although NAR was increased significantly more by histamine than by the vehicle, the effect of bradykinin on NAR was significantly greater than histamine and vehicle in both magnitude and duration of effect. The incremental effect of bradykinin on lavage albumin levels was also significantly greater than both histamine and vehicle. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the nasal vascular effects of histamine are less prominent than its actions on rhinorrhoea, and that the greater obstructive effect of bradykinin than histamine on NAR may contribute to the relative lack of efficacy of H1 antihistamines on nasal blockage in clinical disease.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1988

Histamine bronchoconstriction reduces airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects.

Tachyphylaxis occurs to repeated challenges with inhaled histamine but not with inhaled acetylcholine in asthmatic subjects. This study was undertaken to determine whether prior histamine bronchoconstriction reduces airway responsiveness to inhaled acetylcholine in mild asthmatic subjects demonstrating histamine tachyphylaxis. All subjects developed histamine tachyphylaxis with repeated histamine challenge. The mean histamine PC20 increased from 3.74 to 5.92 mg/ml (p less than 0.005) when the histamine challenges were separated by 1 h. Prior acetylcholine bronchoconstriction did not reduce airway responsiveness to subsequent inhalation of either acetylcholine or histamine in these subjects. However, histamine inhalation did reduce airway responsiveness to acetylcholine in all subjects. The mean acetylcholine PC20 following acetylcholine inhalation was 3.37 mg/ml (%SD 2.17) and this increased to 7.76 mg/ml (%SD 1.80) after histamine inhalation (p less than 0.0005). Thus, this study demonstrates that prior histamine, but not acetylcholine, bronchoconstriction can partially protect against bronchoconstriction caused by both histamine and acetylcholine. Therefore, reduced airway responsiveness caused by histamine bronchoconstriction is specific for histamine and is not due to bronchoconstriction per se. However, the reduced airway responsiveness following histamine bronchoconstriction, is nonspecific.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1991

Radioimmunoassay of histamine.

Histamine is formed by decarboxylation of the amino acid histidine and is found both in plants and in animals, including man. In man it has important biologic functions. To assess the physiologic role of histamine, however, it is necessary to have a reliable and convenient method to determine its concentration in biologic fluids and tissue. Histamine has been determined by bioassay, chemically by different modification of a fluorometric method, by radioenzymatic methods, and, recently, by immunoassays. Immunoassay of histamine has, however, been difficult to establish, mainly as a result of problems with the production of an antibody with histamine specificity. This is due to the general occurrence of histamine in all animal species. By binding histamine to different ligands, several researchers have succeeded in producing antibodies against antigens in which histamine is integrated. Treating samples and histamine standard with the same coupling agent, reliable and specific radioimmunoassays of histamine have been established. We have for some years utilized a commercial radioimmunoassay of histamine and confirmed its convenience, specificity, and sensitivity. In some patients taking a histamine-2 blocker (cimetidine or ranitidine) we have detected an increase in plasma histamine which also tended to be increased after proximal gastric vagotomy and in patients with gastric ulcer compared with patients with duodenal ulcer. In rats treated with high doses of omeprazole for 90 days we found an increase in the enterochromaffin-like cell mass and in histamine concentration in the oxyntic mucosa which was reflected by an increase in plasma histamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Identification of bacteria crucial to histamine accumulation in pacific mackerel during storage.

Bacterial growth and histamine formation in Pacific mackerel during storage at 0, 4, 15, and 25 degrees C were monitored. To identify bacterial species contributing to histamine formation, several groups of bacteria were isolated by using selective media under temperatures corresponding to the various storage conditions. Initially, low counts of bacteria were found in the gill, skin, and intestine of fresh fish, and only weak histamine formers were found in the gill. Histamine was found in the muscle when fish were stored above 4 degrees C, and aerobic plate counts reached 10(6) CFU/g. When fish became unsuitable for human consumption by abusive storage, toxicological levels of histamine were always found. The highest level of histamine formed was 283 mg/100 g in 2 days. The optimum temperature for supporting growth of prolific histamine formers was 25 degrees C. The most prolific and prevalent histamine former was Morganella morganii, followed by Proteus vulgaris, both of which were isolated on violet red bile glucose (VRBG) agar. At 15 degrees C, a significant level of histamine was still produced in fish muscle, although prolific histamine formers were less frequently detected than at 25 degrees C. The isolates on thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) agar were weak histamine formers and identified as Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticus. At 4 degrees C, less than 57.4 mg/100 g of histamine was found in fish stored for 14 days. Most isolates were natural bacterial flora in the marine environment and identified as weak histamine formers. At 0 degrees C, neither histamine former nor histamine production was detected up to 14 days of storage.

Agar↗
PubMed1981

Effects of infused histamine on asthmatic and normal subjects: comparison of skin test responses.

The effect of histamine infused intravenously at sequentially increasing concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 microgram/kg/min) on the wheal responses to intradermal histamine and compound 48/80 in eight normal and five asthmatic subjects and to allergen skin tests in five asthmatic subjects was measured. These measurements were repeated following pretreatment with the H-1 antagonist hydroxyzine or the H-2 antagonist cimetidine, either alone or in combination. Histamine infused in progressively increasing concentrations had no effect on histamine, compound 48/80, or allergen skin tests either before or after H-1 or H-2 antihistamine treatment. No significant difference was found in the concentration of histamine or compound 48/80 required to elicit a 10-mm wheal in normal or asthmatic patients. Pretreatment with the H-2 antagonist alone had no effect on histamine or compound 48/80 skin tests in either group. However, the H-1 antagonist significantly reduced the wheal response to histamine (p less than 0.05 normal; p less than 0.025 asthmatics) and compound 48/80 (p less than 0.05 normal; p less than 0.025 asthmatics) in both groups. The combination of H-1 and H-2 histamine antagonists was not significantly different from the H-1 antagonist alone. Antigen skin testing was suppressed 82% by the hydroxyzine alone; no significant suppression was induced by cimetidine alone, and the combination of hydroxyzine plus cimetidine was only slightly more effective than hydroxyzine alone. The results indicate that blockade of histamine H-2 receptors with cimetidine has little or no additive effect on H-1 antagonist-suppressed skin test responses to histamine, compound 48/80, or antigen. Furthermore, the capacity of histamine to suppress histamine release in vitro from basophils was not demonstrated in vivo assessing skin mast cell responses. This observation combined with earlier studies on the human lung mast cell, which also failed to demonstrate that histamine had an inhibitory action, suggests that the human mast cell may not respond to histamine like the basophil and that this discrepancy may represent a fundamental difference in the cell types.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Evidence for excitatory actions of histamine on supraoptic neurons in vitro: mediation by an H1-type receptor.

The effects of histamine on the firing of supraoptic neurosecretory neurons in the rat were examined in vitro using acutely prepared, hypothalamo-neurohypophysial explants perifused with an artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Extracellular action potentials meeting the criteria of antidromic invasion from neurohypophysial stalk stimulation were recorded from 135 neurons in the tuberal portion of the supraoptic nucleus, which lies superficially along the tuber cinereum and consists of mostly vasopressin-containing neurons. Units could be classified as slow/silent (76.3%), phasic (21.5%) or continuous (2.2%) on the basis of their spontaneous activity. Histamine applied briefly to the perifusate excited approximately one-third of the slow silent neurons and approximately two-thirds of the phasic neurons, with a wide range (10(-3)-10(-9)) in the effective concentration across neurons. The H1-receptor agonists 2-pyridylethylamine and 2-thiazolylethylamine mimicked these excitations in 10 of 12 and 3 of 6 neurons tested, respectively. The H2-receptor agonists dimaprit (4 neurons) and impromidine (5 neurons) failed to excite any of the tested neurons previously excited by histamine. The H1-receptor antagonist promethazine antagonized histamine's excitatory effect in 8 of 9 cells, while the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine had little effect on the 9 cells tested. Histamine also modified bursts of activity induced in some slow/silent neurons by antidromic stimulation without having an observable effect in the absence of an antidromic burst. In 10 of 18 neurons histamine produced an elongation of burst duration and a modest increase in intraburst firing rate when applied during an antidromically evoked burst. In an additional 5 of 17 neurons, which had neither previously responded to histamine nor shown an antidromically-evoked burst, the pairing of histamine application and antidromic shocks resulted in an antidromically evoked burst. The effects of histamine on evoked bursts also appeared to be mediated by an H1-receptor. Histamine's excitation of supraoptic neurons is thus dependent on the electrical activity expressed by the neuron at the time of testing. Conductances activated by depolarization of the neuron may be modified by histamine or this compound may alter the threshold for burst generation. Considered with data showing H1-receptor localization and histamine-immunoreactive fibers within the supraoptic nucleus, the present results, as well as those showing the potency of centrally applied histamine in releasing vasopressin, suggest histamine may act physiologically by altering the electrical activity of vasopressin-secreting neurons.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2006

Histamine decreases myogenic tone in rat cerebral arteries by H2-receptor-mediated KV channel activation, independent of endothelium and cyclic AMP.

The effect of histamine on the pressure-induced constriction was characterized in rat cerebral arteries and mechanisms were investigated. Rat cerebral arteries were pressurized to 70 mm Hg in an arteriograph and the effect of histamine on myogenic tone was studied. Histamine and amthamine, a selective histamine H(2)-receptor agonist, concentration-dependently decreased myogenic tone, which was unchanged in the absence of endothelium. 2-(2-aminoethyl) pyridine, a selective histamine H(1)-receptor agonist, produced concentration-dependent constriction of arteries that was significantly increased in the absence of endothelium. Imetit, a selective histamine H(3)-receptor agonist, has no effect on myogenic tone. The dilation to histamine was antagonized by tiotidine, a selective antagonist of histamine H(2)-receptor subtype, giving a pK(B) of 7.86 that was not altered in the absence of endothelium. The histamine-mediated dilation was significantly antagonized by NF 449, a reversible inhibitor of Gs-protein activation but was not affected by ODQ and SQ 22536. Dilations to histamine and amthamine were accompanied by a decrease in arterial wall calcium measured by fura-2 ratios. The dilation to histamine was significantly reduced by partial depolarization of smooth muscle by 25 mM KCl (control 91+/-5%, 25 mM KCl 53+/-5%, P<0.002) and was not observed in the presence of strongly depolarizing 60 mM KCl. The histamine dilation was not affected by iberiotoxin, barium chloride and glibenclamide but was strongly antagonized by 4-aminopyridine (0.3 mM) and tetraethylammonium chloride (10 mM) (pEC(50): control: 5.6+/-0.1, 4-aminopyridine: 4.1+/-0.1 (P<0.001); tetraethylammonium chloride: 3.2+/-0.2 (P<0.0001)). These results suggest that histamine-mediated reversal of myogenic tone in rat cerebral arteries is endothelium-independent, mediated by histamine H(2)-receptor subtype with no involvement of guanylyl cyclase or adenylyl cyclase activation and most likely involves activation of K(V) potassium channels.

Adenine↗
PubMed2005

Organic cation transporter 3 modulates murine basophil functions by controlling intracellular histamine levels.

In this study, we identify the bidirectional organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3/Slc22a3) as the molecule responsible for histamine uptake by murine basophils. We demonstrate that OCT3 participates in the control of basophil functions because exogenous histamine can inhibit its own synthesis--and that of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, and IL-13--through this means of transport. Furthermore, ligands of H3/H4 histamine receptors or OCT3 inhibit histamine uptake, and outward transport of newly synthesized histamine. By doing so, they increase the histamine content of basophils, which explains why they mimic the effect of exogenous histamine. These drugs were no longer effective in histamine-free histidine decarboxylase (HDC)-deficient mice, in contrast with histamine itself. Histamine was not taken up and lost its inhibitory effect in mice deficient for OCT3, which proved its specific involvement. Intracellular histamine levels were increased strongly in IL-3-induced OCT3-/- bone marrow basophils, and explained why they generated fewer cytokines than their wild-type counterpart. Their production was enhanced when histamine synthesis was blocked by the specific HDC inhibitor alpha-fluoro-methyl histidine, and underscored the determinant role of histamine in the inhibitory effect. We postulate that pharmacologic modulation of histamine transport might become instrumental in the control of basophil functions during allergic diseases.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Characterization of histamine receptors mediating the stimulation of cyclic AMP accumulation in rabbit cerebral cortical slices.

The characteristics of histamine-stimulated adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) accumulation in slices of rabbit cerebral cortex have been investigated. The selective H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine, tiotidine, metiamide and ranitidine appeared to antagonize the stimulation of cyclic AMP accumulation elicited by histamine in a competitive manner consistent with an interaction with histamine H2-receptors. The H1-receptor antagonist mepyramine (0.8 microM) produced only a weak inhibition of the response to histamine. The inhibition appeared to be non-competitive producing a decrease in the maximal response with little effect on the EC50 value. The specific H2-receptor agonist, impromidine, produced a maximum response of only 31 +/- 2% of that obtained with histamine. Studies with histamine and impromidine in combination indicated that impromidine was not acting as a partial agonist. 2-Thiazolylethylamine, a selective H1-agonist, produced only a weak response (EC50 approximately 1mM) yielding a relative potency with respect to histamine (= 100) of 2.5. In the presence of a supramaximal concentration of impromidine, histamine and 2-thiazolylethylamine further elevated the response to impromidine. In these conditions the relative potency of 2-thiazolylethylamine was increased to 59 (histamine = 100), a value which was comparable with that reported for H1-receptor-mediated contractions of guinea-pig ileum. The H1-receptor antagonists mepyramine, promethazine, triprolidine and chlorpheniramine competitively antagonized the potentiation of impromidine-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation elicited by histamine and 2-thiazolylethylamine in rabbit cerebral cortex without affecting the response to impromidine alone. (+)-Chlorpheniramine was some 150 fold more potent than the (-)-isomer in this respect. Histamine and adenosine in combination had a much greater than additive effect on the accumulation of cyclic AMP in rabbit cerebral cortical slices. The potentiation of the adenosine response could be partially but not completely antagonized by either cimetidine or mepyramine. In the presence of H2-receptor blockade with 0.02 mM tiotidine, histamine elicited a significant potentiation (EC50 44 microM) of the response to adenosine. This response was antagonized competitively by mepyramine yielding a KB value of 0.05 microM similar to that obtained from inhibition of the potentiation of impromidine-stimulated accumulation of cyclic AMP (0.02 microM). These results suggest that there are two components in the response to histamine in rabbit cerebral cortical slices. The first component appears to be mediated by histamine H2-receptors while the second, mepyramine-sensitive, component has some ofthe characteristics ofan H,-receptor mediated response and requires prior stimulation of adenosine- or H2-receptors to produce its effect.

Adenosine↗
PubMed1988

Characterization of histamine receptors in isolated human cerebral arteries.

1. The subtypes of histamine-receptors which mediate dilatation of small human cerebral arteries have been characterized in vitro using 'selective' agonists and antagonists. 2. Dilator responses were studied after preconstriction with prostaglandin F2 alpha, since contraction was not seen with histamine concentrations up to 10(-4) M. Histamine caused a concentration-related relaxation of cerebral vessels with an IC50 value of 5.2 +/- 1.6 x 10(-8) M. 3. Mepyramine caused a parallel shift to the right of the histamine concentration-response curve whereas cimetidine was without observable effect. This suggests the presence of histamine H1-receptors only. However, combined treatment with mepyramine and cimetidine caused a more marked displacement of the concentration-response curve to the right. Schild analysis indicated that in situations of near complete blockade of either of the histamine receptor subtypes, simple competitive antagonism both at H1- and H2-receptors can be revealed with a pA2 value of 8.64 for mepyramine and a pA2 value of 6.52 for cimetidine. 4. The 'selective' H1-receptor agonists pyridylethylamine, 2-methylhistamine (2-Me-histamine) and thiazolylethylamine, and the H2-receptor agonists dimaprit, impromidine and 4-methylhistamine (4-Me-histamine) all mimicked the histamine response, but were less potent than histamine. The order of potency was thiazolylethylamine greater than dimaprit greater than impromidine greater than 2-Me-histamine greater than pyridylethylamine greater than 4-Me-histamine. 5. These results indicate that the histamine-induced dilatation in small human cerebral arteries is mediated by both H1- and H2-receptors and that the former subtype of histamine receptor predominates.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Inhibition of tryptase release from human colon mast cells by histamine receptor antagonists.

The main objective of this study was to investigate the ability of histamine receptor antagonists to modulate tryptase release from human colon mast cells induced by histamine. Enzymatically dispersed cells from human colon were challenged with histamine in the absence or presence of the histamine receptor antagonists, and the tryptase release was determined. It was found that histamine induced tryptase release from colon mast cells was inhibited by up to approximately 61.5% and 24% by the H1 histamine receptor antagonist terfenadine and the H2 histamine receptor antagonist cimetidine, respectively, when histamine and its antagonists were added to cells at the same time. The H3 histamine receptor antagonist clobenpropit had no effect on histamine induced tryptase release from colon mast cells at all concentrations tested. Preincubation of terfenadine, cimetidine or clobenpropit with cells for 20 minutes before challenging with histamine did not enhance the ability of these antihistamines to inhibit histamine induced tryptase release. Apart from terfenadine at 100 microg/ml, the antagonists themselves did not stimulate tryptase release from colon mast cells following both 15 minutes and 35 minutes incubation periods. It was concluded that H1 and H2 histamine receptor antagonists were able to inhibit histamine induced tryptase release from colon mast cells. This not only added some new data to our hypothesis of self-amplification mechanisms of mast cell degranulation, but also suggested that combining these two types of antihistamine drugs could be useful for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Calcimycin↗
PubMed1999

Participation of histamine H1 and H2 receptors in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis-induced scratching behavior in ICR mice.

Scratching behavior associated with passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was examined and compared to that induced by compound 48/80 or histamine in ICR mice. Elicitation of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, and intradermal injections of compound 48/80, histamine or serotonin induced both scratching behavior and vascular permeability increase in ICR mice. In mast cell-deficient WBB6F1-W/Wv mice, although histamine induced scratching behavior and vascular permeability increase, passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was not observed. Cetirizine and terfenadine significantly inhibited the scratching behavior and vascular permeability increase caused by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, compound 48/80 and histamine. The histamine H1 receptor antagonists inhibited the vascular permeability increase almost completely, whereas they failed to abolish the scratching behavior. Famotidine and ranitidine significantly inhibited the scratching behavior caused by histamine. The histamine H2 receptor antagonists did not affect the vascular permeability increase caused by histamine. The combination of cetirizine and ranitidine abolished the histamine-induced scratching behavior. The combination, however, failed to potentiate the inhibition of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis-induced scratching behavior significantly. The results indicated that histamine induces scratching behavior in ICR mice through both histamine H1 and H2 receptors, and that histamine plays a major role in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis-induced scratching behavior. Histamine might also play an important role in compound 48/80-induced scratching behavior.

Animals↗