Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,027 records · Page 57Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Repeated episodes of transient radiating back and leg pain following spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine and 2% lidocaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transient radiating back and leg pain defined as pain or dysesthesias in the buttocks, thighs, or calves within 24 to 48 hours after recovery from spinal anesthesia has been described with the use of 2% and 5% lidocaine. These symptoms have also been associated with other local anesthetics such as bupivacaine and tetracaine, although with a much lower incidence. A recent case report and prospective study have described transient radiating back and leg pain occurring following spinal anesthesia with 4% mepivacaine. METHODS: We describe a case of transient radiating back and leg pain following spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine in a patient with unrecognized spinal stenosis who had had repeated episodes of transient radiating back and leg pain associated with lidocaine spinals. RESULTS: Spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine was associated with transient radiating back and leg pain, which was similar in quality and duration to prior episodes following spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Transient radiating back and leg pain may occur with lower concentrations (1.5%) of mepivacaine, as it does with lidocaine. The relationship between transient radiating back and leg pain and spinal stenosis is also discussed.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Categorization and analysis of pain and activity in patients with low back pain using a neural network technique.

Low back pain represents a significant medical problem, both in its prevalence and its cost to society. Most episodes of acute low back pain resolve without significant long-term functional impact. However, a minority of patients experience extended chronic pain and disability. In this paper, we have explored new techniques of patient assessment that may prospectively identify this minority ofpatients at risk of developing poor outcomes. We studied 15 patients with acute low back pain and 25 patients with chronic low back pain over 4 month's time. Patients monitored their pain and activity levels continuously over the first 3 weeks. Pain and functional status were assessed at baseline and at 3 weeks following enrollment. Follow-up assessment of functional status and progress were performed at 2 and 4 months. The pain and activity levels were categorized using a self-organizing-map neural network. A back-propagation neural network was trained with the categorization and outcome data. There was a good correlation between the true and predicted values for general health (r = 0.96, p < 0.01) and mental health (r = 0.80, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found if activity and pain data were not entered into the analysis. Our results show that neural network techniques can be applied effectively to categorizing patients with acute and chronic low back pain. It is our hope that future research will allow these categorizations to be tied to prognostic and therapeutic decisions in patients who present with episodes of back pain.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study identifies the key motivations of patients repeatedly seeking medical care for chronic back problems. DESIGN: We conducted one-on-one, in-depth interviews with patients to discuss their experiences with low back pain and its care. To validate our interpretation of the qualitative data, participants were mailed questionnaires listing the themes identified in the interviews and asked to rate the importance to them of each of the themes. SETTING: Managed health care plans in Atlanta, Dallas, and Seattle. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients (37% male, 63% female) who were 25 to 65 years of age and had three or more medically attended episodes of low back pain during the 3 years preceding the study. MAIN RESULTS: In describing their motivations for seeking medical care for back pain, nearly all participants cited difficulty in performing normal activities and the desire to discover the cause of the pain. Other motivations for seeking medical care for back pain included increased pain and the desire for a diagnostic test or a new treatment. Many of the verbalized reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain are probably best understood as seeking validation of their suffering. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic back pain report many unmet needs and expectations. Overall satisfaction might be improved if clinicians elicit patients' views of underlying causes and their expectations from office visits.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Depressive symptoms as a risk factor for disabling back pain in community-dwelling older persons.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the presence of depressive symptoms is an independent risk factor for disabling back pain in community-dwelling older persons. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up period. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred forty-four members of a large health plan who were aged 70 and older and independent in bathing, walking, dressing, and transferring at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: The presence of depressive symptoms, defined as a score of 16 or greater on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, was documented during a comprehensive baseline assessment that also included information regarding participants' demographic, medical, and physical/cognitive status. The occurrence of disabling back pain was ascertained during monthly telephone interviews. RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were present in 153 (20.6%) participants at baseline. Over the 12-month follow-up period, 186 participants (25.0%) reported disabling back pain during 1 to 2 months and 91 (12.2%) during 3 or more months. After adjustment for potential confounders, the presence of depressive symptoms was independently associated with the occurrence of disabling back pain (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.2-4.4) for 1 to 2 months with disabling back pain; AOR=7.8 (95% CI=3.7-16.4) for 3 or more months with disabling back pain). CONCLUSION: The presence of depressive symptoms is a strong, independent, and highly prevalent risk factor for the occurrence of disabling back pain in community-dwelling older persons.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2001

Back pain as a secondary disability in persons with lower limb amputations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency, duration, intensity, and interference of back pain in a sample of persons with lower limb amputations. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-based survey from clinical databases. PARTICIPANTS: Participants who were 6 or more months post lower limb amputation (n = 255). INTERVENTION: An amputation pain survey that included several standardized pain measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency, duration, intensity, and interference of back pain. RESULTS: Of the participants who completed the survey (return rate, 56%), 52% reported experiencing persistent, bothersome back pain. Of these, 43% reported average back pain intensity in the mild range (1-4 on 0-10 rating scale) and 25% reported pain of moderate intensity (5-6 on 0-10 scale). Most respondents with back pain rated the interference of their pain on function as none to minimal. However, nearly 25% of those with back pain described it as frequent, of severe intensity (>or=7 on 0-10 scale), and as severely interfering with daily activities including social, recreational, family, and work activities. CONCLUSIONS: Back pain may be surprisingly common in persons with lower limb amputations, and, for some who experience it, may greatly interfere with function.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2001

[Coordinative treatment and quality of life - a randomised trial of nurses with back pain].

BACKGROUND DATA: The influence of strength training on back conditions has been demonstrated quite well, whereas coordinative training being a major component of physical therapy regarding preventive and rehabilitative treatment of back pain is used only occasionally and has been evaluated even more rarely. One has to consider this fact regarding the still growing number of musculo-skeletal diseases. AIM OF STUDY: The influence of several preventive therapies (coordination training in spacecurl, kinaesthetics/back protective patient transfer) has been investigated with regard to coordination, back pain and quality of life in a randomised controlled study. METHODS: We used an assessment-set consisting of a specially devised questionnaire regarding job demands, sports activity and back pain and the WHOQOL-BREF for control of quality of life. These methods were combined with body surface electromyography and posturography. Those methods enabled us to determine parameters such as coordination, back pain and quality of life at 3 different stages (untrained individuals) and 4 points (trained individuals) respectively. RESULTS: Trained individuals showed a significant reduction of back pain frequency (p = 0.016) before and after training. In comparison there was no difference in untrained individuals. Furthermore trained individuals showed an increase in quality of life of 5.4 % (p = 0.028), whereas again there was no difference in untrained individuals. Somatic diagnostics (body surface electromyography, posturography) showed significant changes only in the trained group. CONCLUSION: The used coordination training program is enhancing coordination and reducing back pain whilst having a positive effect upon the quality of life of an individual.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain in Germany: update of a systematic review].

BACKGROUND: The ninth book of the German social code, SGB IX, has intensified questions on the effectiveness and usefulness of medical rehabilitation, a multimodal multidisciplinary team care model, especially but not exclusively for chronic back pain. In 2002 back pain was the reported leading cause for 29 % of all medical and other rehabilitative services provided by German statutory pension funds. A previous systematic review of all available German studies (January 1980 to June 2001) analysed the effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain. The present report provides an update and critical appraisal of the review. METHOD: Again we conducted a systematic search for relevant German studies from between July 2001 and December 2003 using electronic data bases, hand-searching of congress abstracts and postal questionnaires. The quality of relevant studies was assessed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Back Review Group. For each study effect sizes for up to six central outcome parameters were calculated using pre-post comparisons from short and medium term follow-ups, they were correlated with prognostically relevant characteristics of the studies and samples. The combined weighted intra-group effect sizes were compared with results from international studies. RESULTS: 16 studies, both controlled and uncontrolled, were included. Again we could not identify any study confirming the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in chronic back pain compared to no treatment or usual care. The methodological quality of the new studies did not seem to exceed that of the earlier ones. Depending on the outcome variable, small effects (e. g. on functional ability) to relevant effects (e. g. vitality) can be observed at or immediately after the end of rehabilitation. Now the effects after three to 12 months seem to be smaller than previously observed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The small size of medium term effects indicates a basic problem of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain in Germany. This becomes even greater when the results of international controlled studies are used as reference. Possible reasons for the disappointing situation (weak methodology, inappropriate selection of patients, weak intervention) are to be discussed. At present, we have no convincing evidence for a general effectiveness of Germany's system of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain.

Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[What questions are appropriate for predicting the risk of chronic disease in patients suffering from acute low back pain?].

AIM: The objective of the study was to develop a brief questionnaire to determine the risk of chronification for patients suffering from lumbar (low) back pain who are consulting a physician for the first or second time. METHOD: At the outset, and again after six months, a questionnaire with 167 valid items for chronification was distributed to patients in orthopedic offices. After six months, patients were contacted by mail to inquire whether they were still suffering from back pain. Based on outcome (persistence of back pain/absence of back pain) and by means of logistic regression analysis, those variables were determined that could predict actual chronification. RESULTS: The following items were predictive: "How strong was your back pain during the last week when it was most tolerable?" and "How much residual pain would you be willing to tolerate while still considering the therapy successful?" (Acceptance value, beta = 0.61), patient's educational level (beta = - 0.44), massage is experienced as bringing relief (beta = 0.44), 5 items of the Zung scale for depression (beta = 0.42), items of the scale for catastrophizing thoughts (beta = 0.41) and items of the scale for feelings of helplessness (beta = - 0.39) of the Kiel pain inventory; duration of the back pain for longer than 1 week (beta = 0.38), pain in other parts of the body (beta = 0.37); and female gender (beta = 0.25) CONCLUSION: Based on these questions, it was possible to predict the chronification of back pain with a probability of 78.05 %. A corresponding questionnaire and an evaluative table were developed.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?

BACKGROUND: Bed rest and back-extension exercises are often prescribed for patients with acute low back pain, but the effectiveness of these two competing treatments remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted a controlled trial among employees of the city of Helsinki, Finland, who presented to an occupational health care center with acute, nonspecific low back pain. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: bed rest for two days (67 patients), back-mobilizing exercises (52 patients), or the continuation of ordinary activities as tolerated (the control group; 67 patients). Outcomes and costs were assessed after 3 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 3 and 12 weeks, the patients in the control group had better recovery than those prescribed either bed rest or exercises. There were statistically significant differences favoring the control group in the duration of pain, pain intensity, lumbar flexion, ability to work as measured subjectively, the Oswestry back-disability index, and number of days absent from work. Recovery was slowest among the patients assigned to bed rest. The overall costs of care did not differ significantly among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute low back pain, continuing ordinary activities within the limits permitted by the pain leads to more rapid recovery than either bed rest or back-mobilizing exercises.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Chiropractic technique procedures for specific low back conditions: characterizing the literature.

BACKGROUND: Many original clinical trials and several review papers have come to the conclusion that manipulation is safe and effective for the treatment of low back pain. However, it is necessary to determine which specific types of manipulation and nonmanipulative types of chiropractic adjustive care are most effective for particular types of low back pain across both tissue-specific and functional classifications. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the quantity and quality of literature gathered for an Expert Panel that was convened to rate various specific chiropractic adjustive procedures for the treatment of common types of low back pain, drawing on the clinical expertise of the panel members and the relevant literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of treatment-specific, condition-specific trials, studies, and case reports of chiropractic care for low back pain. METHODS: Computerized searching and hand searching were used to identify references in the medical and chiropractic literature pertaining to the chiropractic treatment of low back pain in which both the condition and specific treatment procedures were adequately described. This literature was then categorized according to a variety of characteristics and used by a panel to evaluate the specific procedures. RESULTS: The 3 most studied adjustive procedures are side-posture high-velocity, low-amplitude; distraction (mostly flexion distraction); and mobilization, respectively. The clinical condition most commonly addressed by the included studies is low back pain. The procedure with the widest base of evidence support is side posture manipulation for low back pain.

Chiropractic↗
PubMed2002

Motion palpation findings and self-reported low back pain in a population-based study sample.

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical usefulness of motion palpation has not been established, it is one of the most commonly used diagnostic methods by chiropractors. Notably, its sensitivity, specificity, and validity in general have not been adequately studied, and most study samples have consisted of student volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of positive motion-palpation findings (so-called fixations and spontaneous pain response) in relation to self-reported low back pain status and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the motion-palpation technique carried out on the sacroiliac and lumbar joints. DESIGN: Study subjects were examined by 1 examiner (out of 7 possible), who was unaware of their low back pain status. Information on low back pain was then collected in a self-report questionnaire. SETTING: Research laboratory at the Odense University Hospital, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-four twins, consisting of a subset of healthy twins taken from a panel of population-generated twins aged 19 to 42 years, made up the study sample. Examiners consisted of 7 biomechanics (chiropractic) students from the University of Southern Denmark who were proficient in motion palpation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence rates of motion palpation-determined fixations and of spontaneous pain reactions in response to motion palpation were studied in relation to anatomic area, self-reported low back pain status, and each other. RESULTS: The point period prevalence of low back pain was 14%. Fixations were found in 43% of the study sample, and 25% appeared to have a painful reaction to motion palpation. There was no logical pattern of fixations and spontaneous pain reactions in relation to the low back pain status. The sensitivity was generally low (always below 60%) for fixations and pain, whereas the specificity was higher, significantly so for pain in the mid lumbar area. There was no strong association between fixations and the examiners' interpretation of a spontaneous pain reaction in response to motion palpation. CONCLUSION: Motion palpation does not appear to be a good method to differentiate persons with or without low back pain. It is possible to dissociate the findings of fixations and those of pain reactions.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain among chiropractors in an Ontario community.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that chiropractors continue to widely use radiography for assessing patients with acute low back pain. This practice is contrary to growing evidence that suggests only a small percentage of patients with acute low back pain require radiographic evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To assess quantitatively and qualitatively the views of chiropractors in a selected community in Ontario on the use of radiography for evaluating patients with acute low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: Mailed surveys and focus group interview. METHOD: Surveys were mailed to all chiropractors (N = 26) in a selected community in Ontario, followed by a focus group session with local chiropractors (n = 7). Surveys requested information on personal and practice characteristics and the management of low back pain, including the use of radiography. The focus group, led by a facilitator, discussed issues surrounding practice guidelines and radiography use. RESULTS: There was a 76% response rate to the mailed surveys. Of those who responded, 63% stated they would use radiography on patients with uncomplicated acute low back pain lasting 1 week; 68% stated that radiographs were useful in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with acute low back pain lasting less than 1 month. Most reasons given for use of radiography in this patient population are not supported by existing evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a high rate of radiographic use by chiropractors in the study community, which is consistent with findings in previous studies. Many of the reasons given for use of radiography are not supported by existing evidence and may contribute to the gap between current chiropractic practice and available evidence with respect to use of radiography for acute low back pain.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of outcome measures during treatment with the proprietary Harpagophytum extract doloteffin in patients with pain in the lower back, knee or hip.

Besides checking estimates of effectiveness and safety of using the proprietary Harpagophytum extract Doloteffin, this postmarketing surveillance compared various disease-specific* and generic** measures of effect. We enrolled 250 patients suffering from nonspecific low back pain (Back group: n = 104) or osteoarthritic pain in the knee (Knee group: n = 85) or hip (Hip group: n = 61). They took an 8-week course of Doloteffin at a dose providing 60 mg harpagoside per day. The measures of effect on pain and disability included the percentage changes from baseline of established instruments (Arhus low back pain index*, WOMAC index*, German version of the HAQ**) and unvalidated measures (total pain index*, three score index*, the patient's global assessment** of the effectiveness of treatment). Patients also received a diary for the daily recording of their pain and any additional treatments for it. The three groups differed in age, weight and characteristics of initial pain. 227 patients completed the study. Multivariate analysis confirmed that several dimensions of effect were recorded by the several outcome measures but, in all groups, both the generic and disease-specific outcome measures improved by week 4 and further by 8. In multivariable analysis, the improvement tended to be more when the initial pain and disability score was more: older patients tended to improve less than younger, the hip group tended to improve convincingly more than the back group, whereas the improvement in the knee group was less readily differentiated from that in the back group. The subgroup of Back patients who required NSAIDs during the 8 weeks used significantly more per patient than patients in the other two groups, but that requirement also declined more with time. About 10% of the patients suffered from minor adverse events that could possibly have been attributable to Doloteffin. Between 50% and 70% of the patients benefitted from Doloteffin with few adverse effects. Thus, Doloteffin is well worth considering for osteoarthritic knee and hip pain and nonspecific low back pain.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Preparation of dynamic posture and occurrence of low back pain.

Improper posture is considered as one of the causes for low back pain. This study focused attention on low back pain that occurs when people adopt a dynamic posture. Low back pain in attendants was investigated as a typical example of low back pain in a dynamic posture. When multi-dimensional quantification III was applied to the results of the investigation, low back pain was found to occur in six postural patterns: bending knee posture, the posture of lifting and holding a light object, the posture of tilting the trunk, working posture to push a cart, the posture of turning or lifting a cart, and the posture of stretching. This survey found that low back pain frequently occurred when an unexpected load was imposed on the lumbar region and experiments were conducted to simulate the unexpected loading of this region. The experimental results showed that lumbar muscular activity was not fast enough to cope with the load and resulted in an increased swaying of the trunk. This swaying was considered to induce a load on the lumbar region. It is concluded that low back pain can be prevented if an appropriate preparatory set is taken.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of spine motion in elite golfers with and without low back pain.

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder affecting golfers, yet little is known of the specific mechanisms responsible for this injury. The aim of this study was to compare golf swing spinal motion in three movement planes between six male professional golfers with low back pain (age 29.2+/-6.4 years; height 1.79+/-0.04 m; body mass 78.2+/-12.2 kg; mean +/- s) and six without low back pain (age 32.7+/-4.8 years; height 1.75+/-0.03 m; body mass 85.8+/-10.9 kg) using a lightweight triaxial electrogoniometer. We found that golfers with low back pain tended to flex their spines more when addressing the ball and used significantly greater left side bending on the backswing. Golfers with low back pain also had less trunk rotation(obtained from a neutral posture), which resulted in a relative 'supramaximal' rotation of their spines when swinging. Pain-free golfers demonstrated over twice as much trunk flexion velocity on the downswing, which could relate to increased abdominal muscle activity in this group. This study is the first to show distinct differences in the swing mechanics between golfers with and without low back pain and provides valuable guidance for clinicians and teachers to improve technique to facilitate recovery from golf-related low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Analysis of whole-body vibration during manual wheelchair propulsion: a comparison of seat cushions and back supports for individuals without a disability.

Whole-body vibration exposure has been found to be detrimental to the health of humans owing to effects such as degraded comfort, disc degeneration, and lower back pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if selected seat cushions and back supports minimize the transmission of vibrations during manual wheelchair propulsion. Ten unimpaired participants traversed an activities of daily living course using four seat cushions and four back supports. Vibrations were measured using triaxial accelerometers. The time domain and frequency domain transmissibility was used to determine if differences exist among seat cushions and back supports. Differences were found among the four seat cushions and four back supports. Seat cushion and back support manufacturers should concentrate on single-event shocks and repeated shocks, as opposed to oscillatory motions and self-generated vibrations, because the vibrations generated by these events tend to reside in the range of frequencies most sensitive to humans. Vibrations in this range of frequencies have the greatest effect on the transmission of whole-body vibration during manual wheelchair propulsion. Differences among the seat cushions and back supports appear to be due to the seat cushion/back support design and postural support. From a clinical perspective, the time domain transmissibility best describes the transmission of whole-body vibration.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of lumbar range of movement and lumbar lordosis in back pain patients and matched controls.

Inconclusive findings have been shown in previous studies comparing lumbar range of movement (LROM) and lumbar lordosis between back pain patients and healthy subjects. In these studies, confounding variables such as age, gender, height, obesity, and pain level were usually not well controlled. The present study aimed to compare LROM and lumbar lordosis between back pain patients and matched controls. Fifteen male back pain patients and 15 age-, height-, obesity-, and physical activity-matched male controls were investigated. To minimize the effect of pain on the measurements, only patients with minimal or no pain at the time technique was used for the evaluation of LROM in flexion, extension and lateral flexion as well as lumbar lordosis. A lumbar rotameter was used for measuring axial rotation. Pelvic motion was limited by a pelvic restraint device during LROM measurements. Results showed that there were no significant differences between the back pain and control groups in flexion, extension, lateral flexion and axial rotation LROM and also in lumbar lordosis. This may indicate that when a back pain patient is not in pain, LROM and lumbar lordosis may not be the measures that distinguish between back pain patients and subjects without back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Disability, pain, psychological factors and physical performance in healthy controls, patients with sub-acute and chronic low back pain: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare measures of disability, psychological factors, pain and physical performance in healthy controls, and patients with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. To evaluate the concept of the deconditioning syndrome and to explore factors that may contribute to chronicity. DESIGN: Case-control study. SUBJECTS: Three age- and gender-matched groups were included in the study; healthy controls (n = 45), patients sick-listed 8-12 weeks (n = 46) and patients with chronic low back pain on a waiting list for lumbar instrumented fusion (n = 45). METHODS: Measures of disability, pain, psychological factors, and physical performance were obtained from the 3 groups using validated measures. RESULTS: Gender, age, body weight and height were not significantly different between the groups. Comparable scores were found for self-rated working ability, fear-avoidance beliefs for physical activity and aerobic capacity in the 2 patient groups. Oswestry Disability Index, pain, emotional distress, abdominal and back muscle endurance were significantly different between the 3 groups. Self-efficacy for pain and fear-avoidance beliefs for work was significantly different between the 2 patient groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a stepwise deterioration of impairment and disability from healthy controls to patients with chronic low back pain. Most variables distinguished between healthy controls and patients with sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Deconditioning was more related to psychophysical measures of abdominal and back muscle endurance than to cardiovascular fitness. Comparable scores for fear-avoidance and working ability in the 2 patient categories suggest that these factors appear at an early stage and contribute to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain.

Adult↗