Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vision Screening”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources

Screening siblings for glaucoma in the UK.

The current practice and ideals of ophthalmologists when alerting and screening siblings at risk of chronic simple glaucoma were assessed by means of a questionnaire. Seventy-nine per cent of Trent Region consultants responded, and of these, 18% do not attempt to alert siblings of glaucoma sufferers. Those who do rely on the probands to alert their siblings and the high street optometrists to screen. Under more favourable conditions, all respondents would advise screening for siblings over 40 years of age. Fifty-nine per cent would then advocate the letter as the optimum method of communication and 78% would prefer that an ophthalmologist screen this high risk group. In a pilot study of a hospital-based screening service, siblings living within a 15 mile radius of the hospital were invited by letter to attend for screening. Ninety per cent attended, of whom 12.5% required treatment and a further 11% careful observation. The cost of detecting a case of treatable disease by this strategy was estimated at 138 pounds.

Adult↗

[Retino-photography--screening method for diabetic retinopathy].

The paper presents the modern screening method for diabetic retinopathy--the retino-photography. We are presenting our experience on this issue, regarding the patients with diabetes retinopathy examined in Diabetic Eye Department, Ophthalmology Clinic Craiova, between October 2002-June 2005.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗

A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey.

The Baltimore Eye Survey was a population-based survey conducted from January 1985 to November 1988 among residents of east Baltimore, Maryland, who were 40 years of age or older. A total of 5,308 black subjects and white subjects received a comprehensive screening examination for glaucoma including tonometry, visual fields, stereoscopic fundus photography, and a detailed medical and ophthalmic history. Based on a definitive examination, a diagnosis of glaucoma of any type was made for 196 persons. Tonometry, cup:disc ratio, and narrowest neuroretinal rim width were evaluated for their ability to correctly classify subjects into diseased or nondiseased states. There were no cutoff values at which these variables provided a reasonable balance of sensitivity and specificity, separately or in combination. Logistic regression models were fit that included demographic and other risk factors. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for varying cutoff levels on the distribution of predicted probabilities. There was no cutoff for which reasonable sensitivity and specificity were obtained. The authors conclude that the effectiveness of current techniques for glaucoma screening is limited.

Adult↗

Improving the quality of eye care with tele-ophthalmology: shared-care glaucoma screening.

We evaluated a shared-care tele-ophthalmology service initiated by the Rotterdam Eye Hospital and 10 optometrists working in retail optician stores. The optometrists screened their clients with a nerve fibre analyser and the resulting images were then further assessed by trained technicians at the hospital. We analysed data from 1729 patients and measured several indicators of the quality of the work as well as its efficiency and effectiveness. The quality of the images was at least satisfactory in most cases (89%), and the agreement between the optometrists and the hospital about normal or suspect test results was high (81%). Only 27% of the patients were called for additional testing at the hospital department and 11% consulted an ophthalmologist. Eighty new cases of glaucoma were detected. The combination of task redesign and telemedicine accounted for the success of the screening service. Task redesign was needed to transfer screening from the hospital to primary care in a safe and responsible way. Telemedicine was crucial for assuring quality, facilitating information exchange and for coordination.

Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological↗

The Kettering Diabetic Monitoring Programme: twelve months experience of an optometric practice-based scheme.

Over recent years the British Government has pursued a policy encouraging the integration of primary and secondary health care. This drive to promote the efficient delivery of primary care at local centres has seen the forging of co-operative alliances between various healthcare practitioners. A notable development has been the growth of optometric practice-based schemes for monitoring the eyecare of diabetic patients. This paper reports on the first twelve months operation (April 1995-March 1996, inclusive) of such a 'collaborative care' scheme operating in the Kettering Health Area of Northamptonshire. With the co-operation of their general medical practitioner (GMP) and under the case-review of the hospital-based specialist, diabetic patients attended participating optometric practices for an annual sight test and eye examination including mandatory fundus assessment under mydriasis. A brief 'ticked menu' report was subsequently forwarded to the patient's GMP for filing or action as necessary. A copy was also sent to the hospital clinic to enable updating of the diabetic patient database and for the authorisation of the supplementary fee payable to the examining optometrist. An audit of the first year of operation has indicated that those 92% of optometrists in the locality who participated in the programme logged 34% of the projected diabetic population of the Kettering Health Area. Of these individuals, 10.8% were identified as requiring referral for ophthalmological assessment, including 0.7% who needed urgent intervention. Approximately 80% of the referrals were assessed in the Ophthalmology Clinic within the twelve month timeframe of this first year audit; one-third of these patients received treatment and/or a second review over this period, the net outcome being that one-half of the original referrals were returned to the programme for continued routine annual screening. The scheme has received a funding allocation for a further financial year, with the possibility of its extension county-wide being kept under review.

Adolescent↗

Photorefraction screening in premature infants.

BACKGROUND: Photorefraction is a screening technique capable of detecting potentially amblyogenic ophthalmic abnormalities. This screening technique was included as part of a longitudinal outpatient follow-up program of premature infants. The purpose of this investigation is to test the applicability of this screening method in a population of infants at risk for visual compromise. METHODS: One-hundred eighty-two premature infants older than 3 months chronologic age were screened using a commercially available, off-axis photorefraction device. Ophthalmic examinations were performed concomitant with each photorefraction. In most cases, photorefractions were performed before and after administration of cycloplegic medications. All photorefractions were analyzed by an observer masked to the results of the ophthalmic examination. RESULTS: For the 182 patients, the mean birth weight and mean gestational age were 1034.5 g and 28.2 weeks, respectively. The prevalence of ophthalmic abnormalities in the study population was 18%. Sensitivity and specificity rates for the overall screening were 77% and 90%, respectively. Photorefractions were analyzable in 77% of patients studied, with the remaining 23% of our study population unsuccessfully screened. Very young infants (younger than 3 months corrected age) were particularly difficult to photograph, as evidenced by the preponderance of these patients (85%) in the nonanalyzable group. The readability of photorefractions in black infants was improved when cycloplegia was used for the photorefraction. CONCLUSION: Photorefraction screening was an acceptable method of screening for ophthalmic abnormalities in a group of premature infants. Future studies of photorefraction screening techniques in premature infants will need to improve the success rate in young infants, perhaps by improving the fixation device.

Amblyopia↗

Coverage in screening for diabetic retinopathy according to screening provision: results from a national survey in England and Wales.

AIM: To assess the proportion of people with diabetes screened for retinopathy according to provision of screening services. METHODS: Twenty-five health authorities in England and Wales were sampled after stratification by type of screening provision for diabetic retinopathy. Nine did not have a population-based screening scheme, six had an optometry scheme, six had a camera scheme and four had schemes with more than one method of screening ('mixed schemes'). Within each authority general practices were randomly sampled, 129 in total, and in each the records of a sample of diabetic patients examined. RESULTS: Of the 9200 records examined, 5812 (63.2%) had a record of one or more retinal examinations from any source in the year before the survey. This proportion did not differ significantly according to type of screening provision. The proportion of people with one or more retinal examinations by an 'expert' (defined as ophthalmologist, diabetologist, optometrist or screening scheme) in the last year was 44.7% where there was no screening scheme and 62.2%, 59.4%, and 61.6%, respectively, where optometry, camera and mixed schemes were present. Adjusted relative odds (95% confidence interval) for a retinal examination from any source in the last year compared with areas with no screening schemes were 1.19 (0.73, 1.93), 1.26 (0.80, 1.98), and 1.19 (0.77, 1.84) for camera, optometry and mixed schemes, respectively. Equivalent figures for an expert retinal examination were 2.30 (1.51, 3.49), 1.86 (1.25, 2.78) and 2.13 (1.32, 3.45). Coverage by schemes themselves did not differ according to type of scheme. Highest coverage rates, including examinations by screening schemes, were achieved in those treated with insulin, and the lowest rates found in those treated with diet alone. CONCLUSIONS: Screening schemes have had a small impact on overall retinal examinations, but a higher impact on the coverage of examinations performed by experts.

Adult↗

Prevalence of diabetic eye disease in patients entering a systematic primary care-based eye screening programme.

AIMS: Large-scale, baseline prevalence measurements in a population at the institution of systematic retinal screening are currently unavailable. We report the prevalence of all grades of retinopathy at entry into a systematic primary care-based diabetic eye screening programme. METHODS: Primary care-based photographic screening utilizing mydriasis and three-field non-stereoscopic photography for all patients with diabetes (except those under continuing care of an ophthalmologist) in Liverpool. Sight-threatening diabetic eye disease (STED) was defined as any of: moderate preproliferative retinopathy or worse, circinate maculopathy or exudates within one disc diameter of the centre of fovea. RESULTS: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 831): baseline prevalence (95% confidence interval (CI)) of any retinopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and STED was 45.7% (42.3-49.1), 3.7% (2.4-5.0) and 16.4% (13.9-18.9), respectively. Presence of STED was associated with increased disease duration (odds ratio (OR) 1.09 per year; P < 0.0001) and higher in men (OR 2.15; P = 0.001). Type 2 DM (n = 7231): baseline prevalence (95% CI) of any retinopathy, PDR and STED was 25.3% (24.3-26.3), 0.5% (0.3-0.7) and 6.0% (5.5-6.5), respectively. Presence of STED was associated with longer time since diagnosis of DM (OR 1.03; P < 0.0001) and insulin use (OR 2.46; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides baseline information for health providers on prevalence of all grades of retinopathy and STED in a large population at the establishment of systematic screening. Baseline prevalence of STED was high and highest in patients with a longer disease duration in both Type 1 and Type 2 DM.

Adolescent↗

Time of onset of uveitis in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been advocated to decrease the frequency of eye examinations to screen for uveitis in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) because of the low yield of positive findings after an initial normal eye examination. This study was undertaken to determine the time interval for the development of uveitis after the diagnosis of JRA and to further describe patients who develop uveitis related to JRA. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients with JRA examined by either of 2 pediatric ophthalmologists from August 1984 to June 2001. All patients were also under the care of the Pediatric Rheumatology Division at Schneider Children's Hospital. Age of diagnosis of JRA, disease onset subtype of JRA, antinuclear antibody titers, age of diagnosis of uveitis, and complications from uveitis were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred fifty eight patients with JRA had eye examinations; 39 (25%) developed uveitis. Sixteen patients had uveitis on the initial eye examination, and 23 subsequently developed uveitis. When uveitis was absent at the initial eye examination, the mean time to develop it was 20 months (range, 4-81 months). CONCLUSIONS: A normal initial eye examination does not preclude the development of uveitis in patients with JRA. We recommend continuing the current standards of ophthalmologic examinations to screen for uveitis in children with JRA as prescribed by the Section on Rheumatology and Ophthalmology of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Adolescent↗

Frequency doubling perimetry screening mode compared to the full-threshold mode.

The diagnostic performance of the frequency doubling perimetry (FDT) C20-1 screening mode was compared to that of the C20 full-threshold mode. For the number of defects p < 1% in the total deviation plot, both modes appeared to perform similarly in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Different cut-off points should be applied for both modes to obtain equal sensitivity and specificity values, and - related to that - for most subjects more defects were found in full-threshold mode than in screening mode. For the screening mode, we found a sensitivity of 0.91 and a specificity of 0.88 at a cut-off point of >0 defects, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.93.

Adult↗

Effectiveness of screening in preventing blindness due to diabetic retinopathy.

AIMS: Diabetes remains the commonest cause of blindness in the working age population of the UK, but little information exists about the individuals who are currently losing sight from this cause. We determined the current blindness incidence (1998-2000) in Newcastle Health District and the clinical characteristics of these patients. METHODS: Data were collected for 1998-2000 from the Royal National Institute for the Blind Liaison Office of the Newcastle Ophthalmology Department. The Ophthalmology Clinic notes on each individual were retrieved to verify clinical details, including previous eye diagnosis, dates of previous laser photocoagulation and eye surgery. The diabetes clinical records were studied to obtain information on type and duration of diabetes, blood pressure, HbA1c and other biochemical parameters. To ensure completeness of data, details of all patients registered blind attending the Newcastle Diabetic Centre were examined. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were registered blind due to diabetes and 26 partially sighted during this period. The annual incidence of blindness and partial sightedness due to diabetes in the Newcastle district were 0.35 and 0.56 per 1000, respectively. The average ages in the two groups were 65.9 +/- 12.5 and 67.2 +/- 12.3 years and duration of diabetes 15.5 +/- 13.9 and 15.3 +/- 10.6 years, respectively. Proliferative retinopathy accounted for 30 and maculopathy for 24 registrations. The times from ophthalmology referral to registration were 6.2 +/- 3.5 and 4.4 +/- 3.3 years in these groups, respectively. No cases resulted from false-negative screening. CONCLUSIONS: In Newcastle district, where the retinal screening programme has been running since 1986, the rates of blindness and partial sightedness are less than one-third of those reported in the surveys prior to 1997, confirming that objectives of the St Vincent's declarations are being achieved.

Aged↗

Screening merits of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus, and TNO stereo tests.

PURPOSE: Previous works show a pronounced disagreement on the reliability of stereo tests as screening tools for amblyopia and strabismus. This study's aim was to compare the ability of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus, and TNO stereo tests to detect amblyopia and strabismus with visual acuity testing and cover testing. METHODS: A total of 1035 school children aged 12 to 13 years were examined in a field study in Monterrey, Mexico. In addition to the 5 stereo tests, the examination included visual acuity, cover testing, refraction (skiascopy), and inspection of the red reflex and posterior pole. RESULTS: Sensitivity ranged from 17% to 47% (Frisby-Titmus-Lang II-Randot-TNO, in order of occurrence). Of the 60 subjects with strabismus and/or amblyopia, only 8 subjects were identified by all 5 stereo tests. A considerable number of subjects (25), the majority of whom were amblyopic (23 subjects), were not identified by any of the tests. All stereo tests showed higher sensitivities for strabismus than for amblyopia. CONCLUSION: None of the 5 stereo tests studied is suitable for screening for amblyopia or strabismus. The results of both ocularly normal subjects and subjects with strabismus and/or amblyopia are variable, and there is no way of separating normal response from abnormal response.

Adolescent↗

Comparison between two hand-held autorefractors: the Sure-Sight and the Retinomax.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of manifest refraction obtained with two different hand-held autorefractors (Sure-Sight, Welch Allyn Co. and Retinomax 1, Nikon Inc.) and with the Topcon RMA 6000 on-table autorefractor in order to estimate any potential bias between these refractometers and to compare the diagnostic performances of these two hand-held autorefractors as screening devices. METHODS: Ninety-eight children were refracted under manifest conditions with the three above-mentioned refractometers and under cycloplegic conditions with the Topcon on-table autorefractor, or by means of retinoscopy. The agreement between the manifest measurements obtained with the three different autorefractors was studied using the method of Bland and Altman. The validity of several thresholds of manifest refractive anomalies as measured with the Sure-Sight and with the Retinomax was estimated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using cycloplegic measures as reference. results There is a spherical positive bias of 1 D between the Sure-Sight and the Retinomax and better agreement between the Topcon and the Retinomax. The surface area indexes of the ROC curves and the diagnostic performances in term of sensitivity and specificity are better with the Retinomax in cases of hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia. For myopia, the Sure-Sight has better performance. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that either device may be sufficient for assessing refractive errors in children in a screening setting. However, because of a bias between both refractometers in measuring the sphere, distinctive referral criteria must be chosen for the detection of hyperopia and myopia. The diagnostic performance is slightly in favor of the Retinomax.

Adolescent↗

Myopia in secondary school students in Mwanza City, Tanzania: the need for a national screening programme.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prevalence of significant refractive errors and other eye diseases was measured in 2511 secondary school students aged 11-27 years in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Risk factors for myopia were explored. METHODS: A questionnaire assessed the students' socioeconomic background and exposure to near work followed by visual acuity assessment and a full eye examination. Non-cycloplegic objective and subjective refraction was done on all participants with visual acuity of worse than 6/12 in either eye without an obvious cause. RESULTS: 154 (6.1%) students had significant refractive errors. Myopia was the leading refractive error (5.6%). Amblyopia (0.4%), strabismus (0.2%), and other treatable eye disorders were uncommon. Only 30.3% of students with significant refractive errors wore spectacles before the survey. Age, sex, ethnicity, father's educational status, and a family history of siblings with spectacles were significant independent risk factors for myopia. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of uncorrected significant refractive errors is high enough to justify a regular school eye screening programme in secondary schools in Tanzania. Risk factors for myopia are similar to those reported in European, North-American, and Asian populations.

Adolescent↗

A cost-effectiveness model of screening strategies for amblyopia and risk factors and its application in a german setting.

PURPOSE: To develop a general setting-independent decision-analytical model that determines the costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of four screening strategies to detect amblyopia or amblyogenic factors in pre-school children and to apply the model in a German setting. METHODS: The general setting-independent decision-analytical model was developed from the perspective of society and the statutory health insurance was developed. Outcomes were the total number of newly detected true positive cases of amblyopia and the costs per newly detected true positive case of amblyopia. Strategies were screening of high-risk children up to the age of 1 year (ophthalmologists), screening of all children up to the age of 1 year (ophthalmologists), screening of all children aged 3 to 4 years (pediatricians or general practitioners), and screening of children aged 3 to 4 years visiting kindergarten (orthoptists). For the application example in a German setting, data from the published medical literature were used. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis of the application example, screening high-risk children by ophthalmologists had the lowest average cost per case detected but became dominated (less effective and more costly than an alternative) if a low (5.3%) probability of familial clustering of strabismus was assumed. Considering the various assumptions tested in the sensitivity analysis, screening of all children up to the age of 1 year by ophthalmologists was the only strategy not dominated by others. Detection rates, including cases detected before screening, were between 72% and 78% for the strategies that screen for all children. CONCLUSIONS: The model suggests that in Germany, both from a cost-effectiveness and a pure effectiveness point of view, screening all children up to the age of 1 year by ophthalmologists is the preferred strategy to detect amblyopia or amblyogenic factors. All strategies left a significant portion of children undetected.

Amblyopia↗

Visual screening of Swedish children: an ophthalmological evaluation.

PURPOSE: This study describes the various ophthalmological conditions detected in the Swedish visual screening program for children. METHODS: The study was longitudinal and retrospective. All children (3126) born in 1982 in three Swedish municipalities have been followed from birth to ten years of age. Visual acuity was examined at the ages of 4, 5.5, 7 and 10 years. Before the age of 4, a gross examination of the eyes was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of ametropia in the population was 7.7%, the prevalence of strabismus 3.1%, and the prevalence of organic lesions 0.6%. Seven children (0.2%) were visually handicapped (visual acuity </=0.3 in the better eye). Refractive errors and microtropias were mainly detected at the age of 4, when the first visual acuity test was performed, while manifest strabismus was in many cases detected before this age. With this screening and subsequent diagnosis and treatment, the prevalence of deep amblyopia (visual acuity </=0.3) has been reduced from 2% to 0.2%. With treatment, 47% of the amblyopic children achieved a visual acuity better than 0.7. CONCLUSION: Visual screening is effective in detecting visual and ocular disorders. Most conditions are discovered before the age of 6. Compared to an unscreened population, the prevalence of amblyopia is greatly reduced.

Age Distribution↗

Early screening for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of amblyopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a mass screening program for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors in infants. METHODS: Since 1968, children between the ages of 1 and 2(1/2) years in the city of Haifa, Israel, have been systematically screened for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors. The screening is performed by the Ophthalmology Department of Bnai-Zion Medical Center (formerly known as Rothchild Hospital). In 1995, we compared the prevalence and severity of amblyopia in two populations of 8-year-old children in elementary school: one group was a cohort of 808 children from the city of Haifa and its vicinity, who had been screened in infancy (between 1988 and 1990); and the second group, the control group, was a cohort of 782 children from Hadera and its vicinity, where this early screening program is not conducted. Amblyopia was defined as corrected visual acuity of < or =5/10 (20/40), or >1 line difference in corrected visual acuity between the two eyes. Referral rate, treatment rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the screening test in detecting factors that later resulted in the development of amblyopia were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of amblyopia in the 8-year-old population screened in infancy was found to be 1.0% compared with 2.6% in the 8-year-old population that had not been screened in infancy (P =.0098). The prevalence of amblyopia with visual acuity of < or =5/15 (20/60) in the amblyopic eye was 0.1% in the screened population compared with 1.7% in the non-screened population (P =.00026). In the screened infant population, 3.6% were referred from the screening examination to a confirmatory examination and 2.2% were treated. The screening examination had a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 98.6% for amblyopia. The positive predictive value of the screening examination was 62.1% and the negative predictive value was 99.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The screening program for amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors in infants, followed by appropriate treatment, is effective in significantly reducing the prevalence and severity of amblyopia in children.

Amblyopia↗

Evaluation of a local optometric diabetic retinopathy screening service.

AIMS: To determine the sensitivity and specificity for sight-threatening eye disease (STED) of the diabetic retinopathy screening scheme for Stockport during the period 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2001. METHODS: A random sample of screen-negative patients was recalled for further assessment by consultant ophthalmologists. Screen-positive patients, who were referred, were tracked through the hospital system to determine the outcome. RESULTS: In a 12-month period, 3510 individuals with diabetes were screened, which is 1.2% of the district population. Sensitivity for STED was 75.8%[95% confidence interval (CI) 49.3, 99.99] and specificity for STED was 99.0% (95% CI 98.6, 99.3). CONCLUSIONS: The current screening arrangements in Stockport are satisfactory in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Population coverage was 1.2% over 12 months and 1.5% over 15 months and needs to be improved. An integrated computerized register requires further development.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗