Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “VESTIBULAR FUNCTION TESTS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Quantification of slow compensatory eye movements in patients with bilateral vestibular loss. A study with a broad frequency-band rotatory test.

Seven patients with bilateral vestibular dysfunction were investigated with a new broad frequency oscillatory test. The vestibular stimulation was of two types: a pseudo-random oscillation in the frequency range 0.5-4 Hz and a sinusoidal frequency sweep from 0.5 to 3.5 Hz. Compensatory eye movements were recorded by EOG. Gain and phase values between eye and head movements were extracted using power spectral analysis technique. Two different visual conditions were used: 1) fixating a stationary target and /) fixating a moving target (visual suppression test). At high frequencies all patients showed a reduced VOR gain compared to normal subjects. At low frequencies gain values were close to normal when using a predictable (sinusoidal) stimulation. With a non-predictable (pseudo-random) stimulation gain values were significantly reduced even at low frequencies. The patients with the most severe loss showed a phase lag at higher frequencies (condition 1). The results in the oscillatory test were compared to subjective symptoms and caloric responses. The new test appears to be better suited to assess the vestibular function in patients with suspected bilateral vestibular loss than the caloric test or other traditional procedures.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[OTONEUROLOGY].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Diagnostic accuracy of rotation testing vs. standard vestibular test battery--a long-term study.

Interpretation of vestibular test results derived from rotational and other electronystagmography studies often give confusing diagnostic and prognostic information. We have reviewed 90 consecutive patients seen in the Vestibular Clinic at the University of Texas Medical Branch comparing the accuracy of the damped torsion swing test (DTS) with a conventional vestibular test battery (VTB) to predict vestibular function abnormality (peripheral or central). These predictions were compared with vestibular diagnoses obtained by long-term follow-up (24-36 months). VTB and DTS results were evaluated in a double-blind study by two of the authors (W.C.L. and M.J.C.). Agreement of both VTB and DTS interpretation was uncommon (23/77) (30%); however, when present, it resulted in a 91% accuracy in predicting correct final diagnosis. Where VTB and DTS diagnoses differed, the DTS was more accurate in determining final vestibular system abnormality. In fact, while DTS testing correctly detected abnormality in 17 patients, the VTB was normal in 11. Rotation testing alone may provide a useful and accurate screening test prior to initiating further vestibular testing, particularly when central pathology is suspected.

Adolescent↗