Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of two doses of abecarnil for geriatric anxiety.

We studied the tolerability and efficacy of abecarnil, a new partial benzodiazepine agonist, for short-term relief of anxiety in geriatric patients. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, 182 outpatients (mean +/- SD age = 68.3 +/- 5.8; range, 59-85 years) were randomly assigned in a double-blind, parallel-group design to high-dosage abecarnil (7.5-17.5 mg daily), low-dosage abecarnil (3.0-7.0 mg daily), or placebo for 6 weeks of acute treatment followed by abrupt discontinuation and a 2-week follow-up. During the acute treatment period, the discontinuation rate from adverse events was greater for the group treated with high-dosage abecarnil (44%) than for the groups treated with low-dosage abecarnil (14%) or placebo (12%). The most frequently reported side effects associated with abecarnil were drowsiness and insomnia. For the acute treatment period, low-dosage abecarnil was superior to placebo in reducing anxiety at Weeks 2-4 and 6, and was statistically significantly superior to high-dosage abecarnil at Weeks 4-6. More than half of the placebo group showed at least moderate global improvement at Weeks 3 and 6. One week after abrupt discontinuation of abecarnil, the placebo-treated group had less anxiety than did both groups treated with high-dosage and low-dosage abecarnil. The most commonly reported symptoms of withdrawal were headache and insomnia. These data indicate that abecarnil, at dosages ranging from 3.0 to 7.0 mg daily, is better tolerated and more efficacious for the short-term treatment of anxiety in geriatric patients than are higher dosages of 7.5 to 17.5 mg daily. Abrupt discontinuation of abecarnil at either dosage range causes definite rebound symptoms within the first week after withdrawal. These data also suggest that treatment with placebo offers at least moderate relief of anxiety in many elderly patients.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

Interferon alfa-2a is ineffective for patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pharmacological Therapy for Macular Degeneration Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Interferon alfa-2a has been shown to be effective as an antiangiogenic agent for several systemic human angiogenic disorders and has shown antiangiogenic activity in the laboratory. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter double-blind trial was performed at 45 ophthalmic centers worldwide. Four hundred eighty-one patients were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groups: placebo or interferon alfa-2a (Roferon-A), 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 million international units (MIU). Visual acuity testing, clinical examination, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography were evaluated, with the primary end point being a comparison of the number of patients who experienced a loss of 3 lines or more of vision at 1 year. RESULTS: At 52 weeks, 40 (38%; 95% confidence interval, 29%-48%) of 105 placebo-treated patients had lost at least 3 lines of vision (with 12% unavailable for follow-up), compared with 142 (50%; 95% confidence interval, 44%-55%) of 286 in the 3 active treatment groups combined. The difference in proportions was not statistically significant. However, a pairwise comparison of these proportions for the placebo group vs the group that received interferon alfa-2a, 6 MIU (with 26% unavailable for follow-up), showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the placebo group (P = .02) and a nearly significant difference for the placebo vs the 1.5-MIU group (P = .05) (with 16% unavailable for follow-up), again favoring the placebo group. The 3-MIU group (with 22% unavailable for follow-up) did not show a statistically significant difference in pairwise comparison (P = .48), suggesting that a dose-response relationship was not evident. CONCLUSION: Interferon alfa-2a provides no benefit as a treatment for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration and may be associated with a poorer visual outcome when given at a dose of 6 MIU. However, the absence of a clear dose-response relationship raises the possibility that the observed differences result from chance.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Evaluation of acupuncture for pain control after oral surgery: a placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is increasingly being used by the general population and investigated by conventional medicine; however, studies of its effects on pain still lack adequate control procedures. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the (1) efficacy of Chinese acupuncture in treating postoperative oral surgery pain, (2) validity of a placebo-controlled procedure, and (3) effects of psychological factors on outcomes. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Dental School Outpatient Clinic, University of Maryland at Baltimore. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine healthy subjects, aged 18 to 40 years, assigned to treatment (n=19) and control (n=20) groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' self-reports of time until moderate pain, time until medication use, total pain relief, pain half gone, and total pain medication consumption. RESULTS: Mean pain-free postoperative time was significantly longer in the acupuncture group (172.9 minutes) than in the placebo group (93.8 minutes) (P=.01), as was time until moderate pain (P=.008). Mean number of minutes before requesting pain rescue medication was significantly longer in the treatment group (242.1 minutes) than in the placebo group (166.2 minutes) (P=.01), as was time until medication use (P=.01). Average pain medication consumption was significantly less in the treatment group (1.1 tablets) than in the placebo group (1.65 tablets) (P=.05). There were no significant between-groups differences on total-pain-relief scores or pain-half-gone scores (P>.05). Nearly half or more of all patients were uncertain of or incorrect about their group assignment. Outcomes were not associated with psychological factors in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture is superior to the placebo in preventing postoperative dental pain; noninsertion placebo procedure is valid as a control.

Acupuncture Therapy↗
PubMed2004

Butterbur Ze339 for the treatment of intermittent allergic rhinitis: dose-dependent efficacy in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the efficacy and safety of Butterbur extract Ze339 are related to dosage when administered to patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison. SETTING: Multicenter, including 6 outpatient general medicine and allergy clinics. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-six patients were randomized (Butterbur Ze339 high dose, 60; low dose, 65; and placebo, 61 patients). Established diagnostic criteria for intermittent allergic rhinitis were confirmed by skin allergy tests in all patients. INTERVENTIONS: High-dose group, 1 tablet 3 times daily; low-dose group, 1 tablet twice daily; or matching placebo. All groups were treated for 2 consecutive weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main efficacy variable was change in symptoms from baseline to end point during the daytime. The secondary efficacy variables were Clinical Global Impression score, change in symptoms from baseline to treatment day 7, and responder rates. Statistical analysis was prospective, on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Improvement in the main efficacy variable was significantly superior in the Butterbur Ze339 groups, relative to placebo, and a significant dose relationship was observed between the 2 Butterbur doses. The clinicians' assessment of efficacy and the overall responder rates were significantly superior for the active groups compared with placebo. The incidence and type of adverse events were indistinguishable across the herbal treatment and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Butterbur Ze339 is an effective treatment for intermittent allergic rhinitis symptoms and is well tolerated. The effects of this herbal medicine are clear to patients and physicians in a double-blind evaluation against placebo.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of an extract of Ginkgo biloba for dementia. North American EGb Study Group.

CONTEXT: EGb 761 is a particular extract of Ginkgo biloba used in Europe to alleviate symptoms associated with numerous cognitive disorders. Its use in dementias is based on positive results from only a few controlled clinical trials, most of which did not include standard assessments of cognition and behavior. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of EGb in Alzheimer disease and multi-infarct dementia. DESIGN: A 52-week, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. PATIENTS: Mildly to severely demented outpatients with Alzheimer disease or multi-infarct dementia, without other significant medical conditions. INTERVENTION: Patients assigned randomly to treatment with EGb (120 mg/d) or placebo. Safety, compliance, and drug dispensation were monitored every 3 months with complete outcome evaluation at 12, 26, and 52 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), Geriatric Evaluation by Relative's Rating Instrument (GERRI), and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC). RESULTS: From 309 patients included in an intent-to-treat analysis, 202 provided evaluable data for the 52-week end point analysis. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the EGbgroup had an ADAS-Cog score 1.4 points better than the placebo group (P=.04) and a GERRI score 0.14 points better than the placebo group (P=.004). The same patterns were observed with the evaluable data set in which 27% of patients treated with EGb achieved at least a 4-point improvement on the ADAS-Cog, compared with 14% taking placebo (P=.005); on the GERRI, 37% were considered improved with EGb, compared with 23% taking placebo (P=.003). No difference was seen in the CGIC. Regarding the safety profile of EGb, no significant differences compared with placebo were observed in the number of patients reporting adverse events or in the incidence and severity of these events. CONCLUSIONS: EGb was safe and appears capable of stabilizing and, in a substantial number of cases, improving the cognitive performance and the social functioning of demented patients for 6 months to 1 year. Although modest, the changes induced by EGb were objectively measured by the ADAS-Cog and were of sufficient magnitude to be recognized by the caregivers in the GERRI.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Pamidronate therapy previously has been shown to reduce skeletal complications effectively for up to 12 months in breast carcinoma patients with bone metastases. The current study data provide further follow-up results regarding the effects of long term (up to 24 months) pamidronate treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic metastases. METHODS: Follow-up results from two prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trials conducted at academic and community oncology centers were combined to provide a large data set with which to evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of pamidronate therapy. Seven hundred fifty-four women with Stage IV breast carcinoma and osteolytic metastases were randomized to the 2 treatment arms of the trial. Three patients were excluded from the intent-to-treat population for the analysis. A total of 751 evaluable patients were randomized to receive either a 90-mg intravenous pamidronate infusion (367 patients) or a placebo infusion (384 patients) every 3-4 weeks. The primary outcome measures were skeletal morbidity rate (events/year), proportion of patients developing a skeletal complication, and time to first skeletal complication. RESULTS: Of the 367 women receiving pamidronate, 115 (31.3%) completed the trial and 81 (22.1%) discontinued the study due to adverse events. Of the 384 women who received placebo, 100 (26.0%) completed the study and 76 (19.8%) discontinued the study due to adverse events. The skeletal morbidity rate was 2.4 in the pamidronate group and 3.7 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the pamidronate group, 186 of the 367 patients (51%) had skeletal complications compared with 246 of the 384 patients in the placebo group (64%) (P < 0.001). The median time to first skeletal complication was 12.7 months in the pamidronate group and 7 months in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Six patients treated with pamidronate discontinued treatment due to drug-related adverse events. Pain and analgesic scores were significantly worse in the placebo group compared with those patients in the pamidronate group. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, monthly infusions of 90 mg of pamidronate as a supplement to antineoplastic therapy were found to be well tolerated and superior to antineoplastic therapy alone in preventing skeletal complications and palliating symptoms for at least 24 months in breast carcinoma patients with osteolytic bone metastases.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Interferon-alpha does not improve outcome at one year in patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) reduces the severity of skin involvement in early (<3 years) diffuse scleroderma. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 35 patients with early scleroderma received subcutaneous injections of either IFNalpha (13.5 x 10(6) units per week in divided doses) or indistinguishable placebo. Outcomes assessed were the modified Rodnan skin score, as determined by a single observer at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, as well as data on renal, cardiac, and lung function. Pre- and posttreatment skin biopsy samples were analyzed and blood was obtained for assessment of procollagen peptide levels. RESULTS: There were 11 withdrawals from the IFNalpha group and 3 from the placebo group due to either toxicity, lack of efficacy, or death. In the intent-to-treat analysis, there was a greater improvement in the skin score in the placebo group between 0 and 12 months (mean change IFNalpha -4.7 versus placebo -7.5; P = 0.36). There was also a greater deterioration in lung function in patients receiving active therapy, as assessed by either the forced vital capacity (mean change IFNalpha -8.2 versus placebo +1.3; P = 0.01) or the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (mean change IFNalpha -9.3 versus placebo +4.7; P = 0.002). Skin biopsy showed no significant decrease in collagen synthesis in the IFNalpha group, and no significant differences in the levels of procollagen peptides were seen between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that IFNalpha is of no value in the treatment of scleroderma, and that it may in fact be deleterious.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

LJP 394 for the prevention of renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether LJP 394 delays or prevents renal flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a history of renal disease. METHODS: In a 76-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 230 SLE patients were randomized to receive 16 weekly doses of 100 mg of LJP 394 or placebo, followed by alternating 8-week drug holidays and 12 weekly doses of 50 mg of LJP 394 or placebo. An assay measuring the affinity of the serum IgG fraction for the DNA epitope of LJP 394 identified a high-affinity population of patients (189 of 213 patients; 89% taking LJP 394 and 90% taking placebo). Analyses were performed on both the intent-to-treat population and the high-affinity population. RESULTS: Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies decreased and C3 levels tended to increase during treatment with LJP 394. In the intent-to-treat population, the time to renal flare was not significantly different between treatment groups, but patients taking LJP 394 had a longer time to institution of high-dose corticosteroids and/or cyclophosphamide (HDCC) and required 41% fewer treatments with HDCC. In the high-affinity population, the LJP 394 group experienced a longer time to renal flare, 67% fewer renal flares, longer time to institution of HDCC, and 62% fewer HDCC treatments compared with the placebo group. In patients with serum creatinine levels >/=1.5 mg/dl at study entry, those taking LJP 394 had 50% fewer renal flares; no renal flares were observed in the high-affinity group taking LJP 394. Serious adverse events were observed in 25 of the 114 LJP 394-treated patients (21.9%) and 34 of the 116 placebo-treated patients (29.3%). CONCLUSION: Treatment with LJP 394 in patients with high-affinity antibodies to its DNA epitope prolonged the time to renal flare, decreased the number of renal flares, and required fewer HDCC treatments compared with placebo. The study drug appeared to be well tolerated.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1995

Interleukin-2 diphtheria fusion protein (DAB486IL-2) in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with open-label extension.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 1 month duration, with a 2-3-month open-label extension, evaluated the safety, tolerability, biologic effects, and efficacy of interleukin-2 diphtheria fusion protein (DAB486IL-2) in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-five RA patients were enrolled in the trial, and were randomized, after a 3-4-week disease-modifying antirheumatic drug washout, to receive a daily intravenous dose of either DAB486IL-2 or placebo (saline) for 5 days. A blinded, third-party observer evaluated arthritis activity. Clinical response was defined as > or = 25% improvement in swollen and tender joints and > or = 25% improvement in at least 2 of 6 additional parameters. The double-blind phase was 4 weeks; placebo patients could cross over to receive open-label treatment for a maximum of 3 monthly DAB486IL-2 cycles. RESULTS: In the double-blind phase, 4 of 22 patients (18%) in the treated group and none in the placebo group (P = 0.05) met the criteria for clinical response. During the open-label treatment phase, 11 of 36 patients (31%) and 11 of 33 patients (33%) had a clinical response after completing 2 and 3 courses of DAB486IL-2, respectively. Adverse events included transient fever/chills (45%), nausea/vomiting (50%), elevated (< or = 3 x normal) transaminases (55%), and increased joint pain (45%). Twelve patients (8 placebo, 4 DAB486IL-2) did not complete 3 treatment cycles. No apparent differences were noted in CD4+ CD25+ cells of responders versus nonresponders, or of DAB486IL-2-treated versus placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Clinical responses were noted in patients treated with DAB486IL-2 (18%) compared with placebo (0%) in the double-blind phase. In the open-label phase, 33% of patients completing 3 monthly DAB486IL-2 cycles had improvement in arthritis activity. Further studies of IL-2 diphtheria fusion proteins are warranted to elucidate factors that may predict clinical response and define mechanism(s) of action.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

A double-blind, multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients with or without major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in subjects with primary fibromyalgia, with or without current major depressive disorder. METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 18 outpatient research centers in the US. A total of 207 subjects meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria for primary fibromyalgia were enrolled (89% female, 87% white, mean age 49 years, 38% with current major depressive disorder). After single-blind placebo treatment for 1 week, subjects were randomly assigned to receive duloxetine 60 mg twice a day (n = 104) or placebo (n = 103) for 12 weeks. Co-primary outcome measures were the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score (score range 0-80, with 0 indicating no impact) and FIQ pain score (score range 0-10). Secondary outcome measures included mean tender point pain threshold, number of tender points, FIQ fatigue, tiredness on awakening, and stiffness scores, Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-Severity) scale, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-Improvement) scale, Brief Pain Inventory (short form), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, Quality of Life in Depression Scale, and Sheehan Disability Scale. RESULTS: Compared with placebo-treated subjects, duloxetine-treated subjects improved significantly more (P = 0.027) on the FIQ total score, with a treatment difference of -5.53 (95% confidence interval -10.43, -0.63), but not significantly more on the FIQ pain score (P = 0.130). Compared with placebo-treated subjects, duloxetine-treated subjects had significantly greater reductions in Brief Pain Inventory average pain severity score (P = 0.008), Brief Pain Inventory average interference from pain score (P = 0.004), number of tender points (P = 0.002), and FIQ stiffness score (P = 0.048), and had significantly greater improvement in mean tender point pain threshold (P = 0.002), CGI-Severity (P = 0.048), PGI-Improvement (P = 0.033), and several quality-of-life measures. Duloxetine treatment improved fibromyalgia symptoms and pain severity regardless of baseline status of major depressive disorder. Compared with placebo-treated female subjects (n = 92), duloxetine-treated female subjects (n = 92) demonstrated significantly greater improvement on most efficacy measures, while duloxetine-treated male subjects (n = 12) failed to improve significantly on any efficacy measure. The treatment effect on significant pain reduction in female subjects was independent of the effect on mood or anxiety. Duloxetine was safely administered and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this randomized, controlled, 12-week trial (with a 1-week placebo lead-in phase), duloxetine was an effective and safe treatment for many of the symptoms associated with fibromyalgia in subjects with or without major depressive disorder, particularly for women, who had significant improvement across most outcome measures.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2004

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled glucosamine discontinuation trial in knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of glucosamine sulfate in knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A 4-center, 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled glucosamine discontinuation trial was conducted in 137 current users of glucosamine with knee OA who had experienced at least moderate improvement in knee pain after starting glucosamine. Study medication dosage was equivalent to the dosage of glucosamine taken prior to the study (maximum 1,500 mg/day). Followup continued for 6 months or until disease flare, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was the proportion of disease flares in the glucosamine and placebo groups using an intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included time to disease flare; analgesic medication use; severity of disease flare; and change in pain, stiffness, function and quality of life in the glucosamine and placebo groups. RESULTS: Disease flare was seen in 28 (42%) of 66 placebo patients and 32 (45%) of 71 glucosamine patients (difference -3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -19, 14; P = 0.76). In the Cox regression analysis, after adjustment for sex, study site, and OA radiographic severity, time to disease flare was not significantly different in the glucosamine compared with placebo group (hazard ratio of flare = 0.8; 95% CI 0.5, 1.4; P = 0.45). At final study visit, acetaminophen was used in 27% and 21% of placebo and glucosamine patients, respectively (P = 0.40), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were used in 29% and 30% (P = 0.92), and both were used in 20% and 21% (P = 0.84). No differences were found in severity of disease flare or other secondary outcomes between placebo and glucosamine patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with knee OA with at least moderate subjective improvement with prior glucosamine use, this study provides no evidence of symptomatic benefit from continued use of glucosamine sulfate.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase: a twenty-eight-day, multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical trial examining safety and efficacy in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVE: Gout affects approximately 1-2% of the American population. Current options for treating hyperuricemia in chronic gout are limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of febuxostat, a nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, in establishing normal serum urate (sUA) concentrations in gout patients with hyperuricemia (>or=8.0 mg/dl). METHODS: We conducted a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients (ages 23-80 years). Subjects received febuxostat (40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg) or placebo once daily for 28 days and colchicine prophylaxis for 14 days prior to and 14 days after randomization. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects with sUA levels <6.0 mg/dl on day 28. RESULTS: Greater proportions of febuxostat-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved an sUA level <6.0 mg/dl at each visit (P < 0.001 for each comparison). The targeted sUA level was attained on day 28 in 0% of those taking placebo and in 56% of those taking 40 mg, 76% taking 80 mg, and 94% taking 120 mg of febuxostat. The mean sUA reduction from baseline to day 28 was 2% in the placebo group and 37% in the 40-mg, 44% in the 80-mg, and 59% in the 120-mg febuxostat groups. Gout flares occurred with similar frequency in the placebo (37%) and 40-mg febuxostat (35%) groups and with increased frequency in the higher dosage febuxostat groups (43% taking 80 mg; 55% taking 120 mg). During colchicine prophylaxis, gout flares occurred less frequently (8-13%). Incidences of treatment-related adverse events were similar in the febuxostat and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with febuxostat resulted in a significant reduction of sUA levels at all dosages. Febuxostat therapy was safe and well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Hemodynamic effects of creatine phosphate in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind comparison trial versus placebo.

BACKGROUND: The use of metabolic drugs effective in addition to conventional therapy represents a significant challenge in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of acute intravenous (i.v.) administration of creatine phosphate (CP) and of short-term treatment in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) from ischemic heart disease (IHD) or dilated cardiomyopathy in addition to conventional therapy. METHODS: We compared the hemodynamic effects of exogenous creatine phosphate (CP) and placebo in a double-blind, crossover design study in 13 hospitalized patients (12 men, 1 woman, mean age 52 +/- 8 years) with CHF. All patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III and received conventional pharmacologic therapy for CHF; this was not changed during the study period. The study design consisted of two treatment periods (CP or placebo and placebo or CP, respectively) of 4 days each, separated by a 2-day washout interval. The intravenous infusion consisted of 6 g CP or placebo (acute treatment) or 6 g CP or placebo daily for 4 days (short-term treatment) diluted in 50 ml of NaCl 0.9%; infusion duration was about 10 min. Mono-bidimensional echocardiographic examination (Hewlett Packard Sonos 1000, with a 2.5 MHz transducer) was performed at baseline, after acute infusion, and 12 h after the end of short-term treatment. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Student's t-test for paired data; the results obtained after acute and short-term therapy were compared with the baseline values. RESULTS: After placebo therapy, no significant change was observed. The results after treatment with CP showed a significant reduction of end-systolic diameter [baseline: 4.5 +/- 0.6; acute: 4.2 +/- 0.5, (p < 0.001); short-term 4.3 +/- 0.6 cm, (p < 0.05)] and systemic vascular resistance (baseline: 1064.9 +/- 483.7; acute: 947.5 +/- 390.2 (p < 0.05); short-term: 950.7 +/- 394.3 dyne-s-cm-5 (p < 0.05); moreover, a significant increase of percent ejection fraction [baseline: 48 +/- 12%; acute 53 +/- 12% (p < 0.01); short-term 52 +/- 11% (p < 0.01)], and of percent fractional shortening [baseline: 25 +/- 7; acute 28 +/- 8 (p < 0.05); short-term 28 +/- 7% (p < 0.05)] was observed. CONCLUSION: CP was shown to improve cardiac function, even in the presence of a conventional CHF pharmacologic therapy.

Cross-Over Studies↗
PubMed2002

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine in nursing home residents with non-major depression.

Depression is common across a broad spectrum of severity among nursing home residents. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of antidepressants in nursing home residents with major depression, but it is not known whether antidepressants are helpful in residents with less severe forms of depression. We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 8-week trial comparing paroxetine and placebo in very old nursing home residents with non-major depression. The main outcome measure was the primary nurse's Clinical Impression of Change (CGI-C). Additional outcome measures were improvement on the interview-derived Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Cornell Scale for Depression (CS) scores. Twenty-four subjects with a mean age of 87.9 were enrolled and twenty subjects completed the trial. Placebo response was high, and when all subjects were considered, there were no differences in improvement between the paroxetine and placebo groups. Two subjects that received paroxetine developed delirium, and subjects that received paroxetine were more likely to experience a decrease in Mini Mental State Exam scores (P =.03). There were no differences in serum anticholinergic activity between groups. In a subgroup analysis of 15 subjects with higher baseline HDRS and CS scores, there was a trend toward greater improvement in the paroxetine group in an outcome measure that combined the CGI-C and interview-based measures (P =.06). Paroxetine is not clearly superior to placebo in this small study of very old nursing home residents with non-major depression, and there is a risk of adverse cognitive effects. Because of the high placebo response and the trend towards improvement in the more severely ill patients, it is possible that a larger study would have demonstrated a significant therapeutic effect for paroxetine as compared with placebo. The study also illustrates the discordance between patient and caregiver ratings, and the difficulties in studying very elderly patients with mood disorders.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Risperidone for psychosis of Alzheimer's disease and mixed dementia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose risperidone in treating psychosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mixed dementia (MD) in a subset of nursing-home residents who had dementia and aggression and who were participating in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of risperidone for aggression. METHOD: This post-hoc analysis included only patients diagnosed with AD or MD with psychosis, defined by a score of >or= 2 on any item of the Behavioral Pathology of Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) psychosis subscale at both screening and baseline. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were changes in scores on BEHAVE-AD psychosis subscale and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C). RESULTS: Overall, 93 patients (46 risperidone and 47 placebo) fulfilled the psychosis of AD criteria. Mean change at endpoint in BEHAVE-AD psychosis subscale with risperidone was superior to placebo (-5.2 vs -3.3; p = 0.039). Distribution of CGI-C at endpoint also favoured risperidone (p < 0.001). The superior improvement with risperidone compared with placebo occurred as early as the first two weeks and persisted to the end of the treatment period. At endpoint, 59% of risperidone-treated patients were responders (i.e. were 'very much' or 'much' improved) compared with 26% of patients receiving placebo. The mean risperidone dose was 1.03 +/- 0.61 mg/day. Twelve weeks of treatment were completed by 37 patients treated with risperidone (80%) and 35 with placebo (74%). A total of 46 (98%) placebo- and 44 (96%) risperidone-treated patients experienced at least one adverse event, with only somnolence occurring more frequently in the risperidone group. CONCLUSION: Risperidone effectively reduces psychosis and improves global functioning in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe psychosis of AD and MD.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Estazolam and flurazepam: a multicenter, placebo-controlled comparative study in outpatients with insomnia.

A multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of estazolam compared with flurazepam as hypnotics. Outpatients complaining of insomnia were randomized to receive either estazolam 2 mg, flurazepam 30 mg or placebo for 7 consecutive nights. The analysis of efficacy was based on the patients' daily assessments of sleep and the investigators' global evaluations. Adverse events which were considered by the investigator to be attributable to, or of unknown relationship to the test medication were analyzed. The patient subjective questionnaire indicated that estazolam and flurazepam significantly improved all parameters (P less than .05) as compared to placebo. A marked or moderate improvement in sleep was reported by 81% (58/72), 78% (63/81) and 36% (27/76) of estazolam, flurazepam, and placebo recipients, respectively. There were no significant differences in hypnotic effect between estazolam and flurazepam. All efficacy parameters of the investigators' global evaluation improved significantly more (P less than .05) for patients receiving estazolam or flurazepam (except quality of sleep) than for those receiving placebo. The percentage of patients reporting any adverse experience was greatest for flurazepam (72%), followed by estazolam (59%), and placebo (43%). Somnolence and hypokinesia were the most commonly reported adverse events. An analysis of the global evaluation of side effects showed that flurazepam had a significantly worse side effect profile than estazolam (P less than .05) or placebo (P = .001). Estazolam and flurazepam effectively, and comparably, relieved insomnia when administered for 7 nights in adult patients complaining of insomnia. Estazolam demonstrated a more favorable side effect profile than flurazepam.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1998

Tramadol hydrochloride: analgesic efficacy compared with codeine, aspirin with codeine, and placebo after dental extraction.

Tramadol hydrochloride is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with two complementary mechanisms of action: opioid and aminergic. Relative to codeine, tramadol has similar analgesic properties but may have fewer constipating, euphoric, and respiratory depressant effects. A two-center randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed to assess the analgesic efficacy and reported side effects of tramadol 100 mg, tramadol 50 mg, codeine 60 mg, aspirin (ASA) 650 mg with codeine 60 mg, and placebo. Using a third molar extraction pain model, 200 healthy subjects were enrolled in a 6-hour evaluation after a single dose of drug. Of the 200 patients enrolled, seven provided incomplete efficacy data or discontinued prematurely and one was lost to follow-up. Using standard measures of analgesia, including total pain relief score (TOTPAR), maximum pain relief score (MaxPAR), sum of pain intensity difference scores (SPID), peak pain intensity difference (Peak PID), remedication, and global evaluations, all active treatments were found to be numerically superior to placebo. ASA/codeine was found to be statistically superior to placebo for all measures of efficacy. Tramadol 100 mg was statistically superior to placebo for TOTPAR, SPID, and time of remedication, whereas tramadol 50 mg was statistically superior to placebo onlyfor remedication time. Codeine was not found to be statistically superior to placebo for any efficacy measure. A greater TOTPAR response compared with all other active measures was seen for ASA/codeine during the first 3 hours of study. The 6-hour TOTPAR scores for the tramadol groups and ASA/ codeine group were not significantly different. Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, dysphagia, vomiting) were reported more frequently with tramadol 100 mg, ASA/ codeine, and codeine 60 mg than with placebo.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study of aerosolized interferon gamma-1b in patients with mild to moderate cystic fibrosis lung disease.

Interferon gamma-1b (IFN-gamma1b) is a pleiotropic cytokine with immunomodulatory activities that could decrease bacterial burden, inflammation, and obstruction in patients with CF. Patients with CF (> or =12 years old, FEV1 > or =40% predicted) were randomly assigned to sequential dose cohorts inhaling 500 microg IFN-gamma1b, 1,000 microg IFN-gamma1b, or placebo by Respirgard II nebulizer thrice weekly for 12 weeks. Sputum bacterial density and spirometry were measured. Safety, antibiotic use, hospitalization, and sputum neutrophils, elastase, DNA, IL-8, and myeloperoxidase were also evaluated. Sixty-six patients (mean age, 24 years, with mean baseline FEV1 of 74 +/- 20 (SD) percent predicted) were studied. One patient had bronchospasm after the first dose of IFN-gamma1b; the overall withdrawal rate was 15% (5 in the placebo group, 2 in the 500-microg IFN-gamma1b group, and 3 in the 1,000 microg IFN-gamma1b group). The 500-microg IFN-gamma1b dose was well-tolerated, but the 1,000-mug dose cohort, who had a higher baseline bacterial density than placebo patients (mean difference, 1.2 log(10) CFU/g sputum, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1,2.8, P=0.04), had 24% more hospitalizations for exacerbation than placebo patients (95% CI, 2,45%, P=0.05). There was a 0.12-l difference between the 500-microg IFN-gamma1b and placebo groups with respect to the 12-week change in FEV1 (active group minus placebo group, 95% CI, -0.03,0.26, P=0.11), as compared to a 0.01-l difference between the 1,000-microg IFN-gamma1b and placebo groups (95% CI, -0.16,0.17, P=0.96). No effects of IFN-gamma1b were seen in sputum bacterial density or inflammatory biomarkers at 12 weeks. Aerosolized IFN-gamma1b did not improve pulmonary function, reduce sputum bacterial density, or affect inflammatory sputum markers in patients with mild-moderate lung disease.

Administration, Inhalation↗