Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance Claim Review”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

The impact of utilization management on readmissions among patients with cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if prospective utilization reviews that lead to reduced hospital length of stay (LOS) relative to days requested by an attending physician affect the likelihood of readmission for privately insured patients with cardiovascular disease. DATA SOURCES: Data obtained from a private insurance company on utilization management decisions from 1989 through 1993. During this five-year period, 39,117 inpatient reviews were conducted, 4,326 (11.1 percent) on patients with cardiovascular disease. We selected for analysis all 4,326 reviews performed on patients with cardiovascular disease. STUDY DESIGN: We used proportional hazard analysis (Cox regression) to investigate the relationship between LOS reductions relative to days requested by a patient's attending physician and the likelihood of readmission within 60 days of discharge. Separate analyses were performed for medical and procedural admissions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There were 2,813 requests for medical admission, and 1,513 requests for procedural admission. Requests for admission were rarely denied. Length of stay was reduced relative to that requested by the treating physician for 17 percent and 19 percent of medical and procedural admissions, respectively. Cumulative 60-day readmission rates were 9.5 percent for medical admissions and 12.3 percent for procedural admissions. We found no relationship between LOS reduction and the likelihood of readmission for medical admissions. However, patients admitted for procedures who had their length of stay reduced by two or more days were 2.6 times as likely to be readmitted within 60 days as those who had no reduction in their length of stay (95% CI: 1.3-5.1; p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization management (UM) rarely denies requests for inpatient treatment of cardiovascular disease. The association between LOS reduction and the likelihood of readmission for patients admitted for cardiovascular procedures raises concern that UM may adversely affect clinical outcome for some patients. Further research is needed to definitively elucidate any relationship that might exist between utilization review decisions and quality of care.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Peptic ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in patients younger than 65 years. A large health maintenance organization cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with an elevated risk of peptic ulcer and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, but published reports have lacked information on rates of outpatient disease, have concentrated on the elderly, and have not provided comparisons of rates for specific types of NSAIDs. METHODS: We compared incidence rates of peptic ulcer and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 68 028 people younger than 65 years who used diclofenac sodium, naproxen, piroxicam, or sulindac, and who were members of a network of health maintenance organizations. We reviewed automated insurance claims data and medical records to ascertain cases and included conditions treated on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: Medical claims data were adequate for crude identification of potential cases, but review of medical records led to rejection of 63% of these, representing either no abnormality or diseases other than peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Of the total 112 cases, 64 (57%) were treated as outpatients. The crude incidence rate per 1000 person-years in users of any current, recent, or past NSAID was 2.2 and in distant-past users of NSAIDs was 0.75. For diclofenac, naproxen, piroxicam, and sulindac, we found a consistent pattern of decreasing NSAID effects from current to recent to past exposure. The risk of peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage was 1.6 cases per 1000 people using NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Combining use of automated claims records with review of medical records promotes efficiency while maintaining specificity of case ascertainment. This study, with 57% of cases treated as outpatients, had results consistent with other published reports that were based on hospitalized patients. Within the limits of statistical error, the incidence rates of peptic ulcer and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage appeared to be similar for the various NSAIDs studied.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

When not to syringe an ear.

This article reviews the potential hazards of ear syringing and the Accident Compensation Corporation Medical Misadventure Unit's experience of alleged iatrogenic injury over a 17-month period. Syringing claims account for about 25% of the total claims received by the ACC ENT Medical Misadventure Committee. Forty-seven claims were accepted as either mishap or error, and 63 claims were declined. Perforation of the drum was by far the commonest injury resulting in significant disability. Severe iatrogenic otitis externa accounted for most of the remainder. Practice nurses had syringed the ears of approximately two-thirds of the claimants with significant disability. The contraindications to ear syringing are listed and discussed. The correct technique, with a few "do and don't" pointers, is briefly reviewed. Management of the unintentional injury is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Claim audits: a relic of the indemnity age?

Traditional claim audits offering quick fixes to specific problems or to recover overpayments will not provide benefit managers with the data and action plan they need to make informed decisions about cost-effective benefit administration. Today's benefits environment calls for a comprehensive review of claim administration, incorporating traditional audit techniques into a quality improvement audit process.

Administrative Personnel↗
PubMed2002

Ulnar nerve injury and perioperative arm positioning.

Primum non nocere. Hippocrates included this admonition in Epidemics, Book I, Second Constitution, to do good or "to do no harm." However, even the most conscientious health care provider will encounter unexpected and serious adverse medical events. This discussion focuses on one relatively common, often perplexing, and usually unexplained perioperative complication: ulnar neuropathy. Perioperative ulnar neuropathy has received increased scientific attention because it accounts for one third of all nerve injury claims in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Closed Claims Study database. In addition, these injuries may result in chronic pain or paresthesia, employment disability, catastrophic economic damages, and malpractice litigation. We will explore the current understanding of perioperative ulnar nerve dysfunction by summarizing the relevant scientific literature and information within the ASA closed-claims database, describing the epidemiologic features of perioperative nerve injuries, discussing relevant clinical investigations and recommendations for safe arm positioning during anesthesia, and reviewing the medico-legal issues inevitably intertwined with this topic, particularly the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2000

[Disability claim review by non-physicians to meet the legal requirement of Dutch work disability certification laws].

The number of assessments of incapacity for work has increased to such an extent in the Netherlands (450,000 per year, of which 150,000 are first assessments) that experiments are now being undertaken to employ non-physicians for these assessments. There is no shortage of insurance physicians however: the number available is underestimated as many of these have resigned their regular jobs to perform the same activities on a freelance or second basis. A problem is certainly that these physicians are hindered by an exceedingly bureaucratic system in which e.g. patients are summoned by the administrative section to be reassessed who have already resumed working. Non-physicians may assist in the assessments, but in most cases there is a relation between psychic, somatic and social factors, which requires the generalist physician's eye. The main problem is that government regulations lead to a steady growth in the number of (re)assessments required. A possible but onorthodox solution is proposed which involves medical certification of incapacity for work. This may discourage long-term absenteeism and at the same time it may draw the physician's attention to the existence of an industrial health care problem.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2002

The effects of a medical care utilization review program on back and neck injury claims.

A number of quality-based evaluation and treatment protocols have been developed and marketed for the management of work-related musculoskeletal problems. Yet, little is known about their effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. We evaluated one such approach adopted by the Department of Labor and Industries, which insures approximately two-thirds of the non-federal workforce in Washington State. The outcomes of back and neck injury claims (primarily sprains and strains) filed in the 2 months after the program was fully operational were compared with two comparable groups of claims from the same base population filed before the program's availability. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the number of days of work loss, medical costs, and permanent partial disability awards granted during the 2 years after injury. The quality-based program used as an adjunct to claims management failed to improve outcomes.

Absenteeism↗
PubMedDate not supplied

DRG analysis reveals potential problems, trends.

Specific DRGs are frequently the targets of review if they are connected to errors. But documentation review alone to identify problems may not be sufficient. The author describes a strategy to review aggregate data for two tricky DRGs.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Inequity in mental health care under Canadian universal health coverage.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has produced conflicting evidence about socioeconomic disparities in mental health care under universal health coverage in Canada. This study sought to determine equity in the delivery of ambulatory services from psychiatrists and family physicians for mental health problems in this setting. METHODS: Outpatient billing claims and neighborhood socioeconomic status were examined with cross-sectional analysis. The study area consisted of the central southern portion of the city of Toronto, Ontario, including the city's downtown core. This urban setting is an economically and culturally diverse area. A total of 1,221 homogeneous enumeration areas (local neighborhoods) were surveyed, and data were examined for the 746,141 residents of these areas who had had a health visit in 2000. Rates of mental health visits to family physicians and psychiatrists were compared across socioeconomic quintiles. Socioeconomic status was determined according to educational attainment in the enumeration area. RESULTS: Claimants from neighborhoods with the highest socioeconomic status were 1.6 times as likely as those from neighborhoods with the lowest socioeconomic status to use psychiatric care. Among persons who received care from a psychiatrist, claimants from neighborhoods with the highest socioeconomic status had significantly more psychiatric claims than those from neighborhoods with the lowest socioeconomic status. No significant gradients were found for either sex for any use of mental health care provided by family physicians. Among females, service users from the highest socioeconomic areas had more mental health visits to family physicians than those from the lowest socioeconomic areas. CONCLUSIONS: Marked socioeconomic disparities were found in the use of care from a psychiatrist. Unlimited coverage of physician-provided mental health care is insufficient to fairly distribute services to those most in need.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Prospective screening of diagnostic testing: a valuable tool.

The elimination of unneeded services is a key to reducing medical costs and enhancing quality of care. Diagnostic tests have been a target of efforts to reduce costs primarily because they are discretionary and often appear to be unnecessary. Believing that the concept of prior review for many diagnostic tests is a good one, this pilot study sought to evaluate prospectively the propriety of diagnostic tests ordered during the first half of 1989 on individuals insured through a major insurance carrier. A physician review found that 21% of the tests were deemed inappropriate, leading to the conclusion that prospective review can be an effective means of screening inappropriately ordered tests.

Cost Savings↗