Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fantasy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources

Expert systems: fact or fantasy?

Within the last decade, much ado has been made about expert systems, a revolutionary technology that may strongly impact the delivery of healthcare. In the midst of endless discussions of the potential of expert systems, confusion nevertheless reigns supreme when it comes to understanding just exactly what this technology does and its function within the healthcare environment.

Expert Systems↗

Cancer gene therapy--fantasy or foresight?

Gene therapy is an exciting new method of treatment that may have far-reaching implications on the way we manage diseases in the future. Cancer has become the principal focus of this futuristic research. The breathtaking pace of gene discovery in the last two decades, coupled with the birth of recombinant DNA technology, gave rise to the concept that genes may be manipulated and used as drugs. Genetic modification of cells can be carried out in petri dishes (ex vivo) or within the living system (in vivo). In order for the therapeutic genes to exert their effect, they have to be transported into the cell nucleus where transcription takes place. Liposomes and genetically modified viruses have been extensively used as gene vectors. The ideal vector remains elusive. It would be one that can achieve tumour-specific, sustained, and regulatable gene expression without host toxicity. As a result of the past decade of intense gene therapy research, we have learned that it is a rational scientific concept that works remarkably well in petri dishes and in laboratory animals. However, early clinical gene therapy experimentations paled in comparison. This apparent disparity between dramatic preclinical successes and the very modest clinical results of gene therapy does not in anyway nullify the concept of gene therapy. Instead, it exposes the folly of underestimating the technical complexity of gene manipulation in human diseases. Fortunately, technical hurdles such as those confronting gene therapy today are not insurmountable; they need, however, much ingenuity, resolution and time to be overcome. It is reassuring that recent advances in gene therapy provide abundant evidence that the premature infant, born of unrealistic pressure, is indeed healthy and thriving. With proper nurturing and patience, there is no doubt that, in time, it will bear fruit.

Animals↗

Reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS): fact or fantasy?

Most evidence suggests that RADS is a distinct syndrome and not simply an exacerbation of pre-existing hyperresponsiveness. There is no doubt that much remains to be explained regarding pathogenesis. On the other hand, I urge caution about the claims of "low-level RADS". Here the data are much more anecdotal and leave much to be desired.

Asthma↗

American Indian suicide--Fact and fantasy.

This is an epidemiology report on American Indian suicide patterns in the Pacific Northwest. The purpose of this report is to: (1) describe the first three years of a pilot project in suicide epidemiology, (2) demonstrate significant differences in tribal rates, (3) show that the total American Indian population has equally significant differences in tribal comparisons, and (4) clarify previous misconceptions about the "American Indian suicide phenomenon".

Adolescent↗

Defined contribution health care: future direction or fantasy?

Will payers embrace defined contribution plans as an alternative to traditional health insurance or is this new approach a pipe dream? Are consumers truly ready to make informed decisions on purchasing their own health care? This article explores barriers to defined contribution health plans, including consumer reluctance to take ownership of buying insurance and a preference for the cost predictability of liberal coverage in employer-sponsored programs versus MSAs or higher co-payment arrangements. For the ultimate form of defined contribution health care to work, several tax and insurance barriers must be overcome. As a practical matter, the author argues that the current employer-sponsored approach is the most efficient system for large employers.

Cost Control↗