Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CONTRACEPTIVES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources

Determinants of menstrual bleeding patterns among women using natural and hormonal methods of contraception. II. The influence of individual characteristics.

Menstrual diary records were obtained from women using either a natural method of contraception, a combined or progestogen-only oral contraceptive, a vaginal ring, or a long-acting injectable (DMPA). Within each method group, multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between the subjects' bleeding patterns and their age, age at menarche, ponderal index, obstetric and contraceptive history and ethnic origin. The influence of ethnic origin was described in the preceding paper. Among combined pill users, increasing age was associated with more frequent spotting episodes. In both the untreated and combined pill groups, women with a higher ponderal index had less variable bleeding-free intervals; in the vaginal ring and DMPA groups, the more obese women had shorter bleeding/spotting episodes and longer bleeding-free intervals. Among combined oral contraceptive users, the most influential variable was the time since the end of the woman's last pregnancy: subjects who had been more recently pregnant had longer, less predictable episodes and shorter intervals. Previous oral contraceptive use was associated with more predictable bleeding patterns among women currently using either type of oral pill. In the vaginal ring and DMPA groups, subjects whose last pregnancy had ended in abortion had more bleeding/spotting days and episodes than those who had had a live birth. As reported previously, bleeding patterns were more closely related to the woman's geographical region of residence than to any other factor. The associations found with other individual characteristics were often inconsistent or difficult to interpret. A number of variables which could potentially influence menstrual bleeding patterns, such as nutritional status, were not measured and therefore could not be included in the analysis. However, contraceptive method and ethnic origin may be predominant influences, overriding any other factor.

Abortion, Induced↗

The "boom and bust phenomenon": the hopes, dreams, and broken promises of the contraceptive revolution.

The "boom and bust phenomenon" is a pattern that has emerged in the development, introduction, and delivery of a number of significant new contraceptive products in the United States. When a new contraceptive product is introduced with great promise and publicity, it usually experiences a "boom" during which sales, demand, and expectations are high. This boom is often followed by a "bust" phase during which a product does not live up to expectations, initial excitement falls off, and a drop in sales and use ensues. The boom and bust phenomenon goes to the heart of what some have referred to as the failed promise of the contraception revolution by creating obstacles to significant expansion of contraceptive choice in the United States. Case studies of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and Norplant(R) are used to illustrate the boom and bust phenomenon and the effect it has had in shaping the direction of advances in contraceptive technology.

Consumer Behavior↗

Safety implications of transferring the oral contraceptive from prescription-only to over-the-counter status.

The idea of making oral contraceptives available without prescription has a long history, and has been recently revived in the US and the UK. High dose oral contraceptives have generally been replaced by low dose formulations and, subsequently, most cardiovascular risks have been reduced and a protection against ovarian and uterine cancers has been consistently demonstrated. Oral contraceptive compliance, however, continues to be a problem, but there is no reason to assume that wise practice would be any more or less if oral contraceptives were available over-the-counter (OTC). Some countries have introduced alternatives to prescription-only oral contraceptives, whereby nurses, midwives, social workers and/or pharmacists are incorporated into the distribution process. This article concludes that the balance of risks and benefits is in favour of OTC access for oral contraceptives.

Contraceptives, Oral↗

The role of triphasic levonorgestrel in oral contraception: a review of metabolic and hemostatic effects.

Epidemiological studies suggesting a possible association between the use of combined oral contraceptives and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease have led to extensive investigations into the effect of oral contraceptives on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and on hemostasis. Since this association was originally suggested, the steroid dose in oral contraceptives has been significantly reduced and new progestogens have been developed. Also, triphasic formulations have been introduced which offer a well-balanced estrogen/progestogen ratio, allowing a further reduction in the progestogen dose per cycle, and thus helping to minimize unwanted metabolic and hemostatic effects. The metabolic interactions of triphasic levonorgestrel, the first triphasic formulation to be introduced, have received particular attention. Lipid metabolism appears to be largely unaffected by triphasic levonorgestrel, most studies reporting no significant change in high- (HDL-C) or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Several studies have reported a decrease in the lipoprotein subfraction HDL2-C levels, but in most cases measurements of the LDL-C/HDL-C and apolipoprotein A-1/B ratios reveal no clinically significant effects. Concerning lipids, most studies suggest that triphasic levonorgestrel has less metabolic impact than the monophasic formulation. In common with all currently available oral contraceptives, triphasic levonorgestrel appears to have some effect on carbohydrate metabolism. The study results vary, however; some investigators have found an impairment of glucose tolerance, whereas others have not detected any significant effect. Compared with lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, fewer studies have investigated the effect of triphasic levonorgestrel on hemostasis. In common with all estrogen-containing oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel appears to stimulate some procoagulant activity, elevating the levels of factors VII and X, and fibrinogen. However, the effect of triphasic levonorgestrel appears to be balanced, with most studies reporting a corresponding increase in anti-coagulant-fibrinolytic activity. Although most of the studies reviewed here reported some statistically significant metabolic interactions, many authors comment that the changes are probably not clinically relevant in terms of an altered risk of cardiovascular disease. The true risk of vascular disease associated with modern low-dose oral contraceptives remains to be confirmed when sufficient epidemiological data eventually become available.

Carbohydrate Metabolism↗

Oral contraceptives. Who, which, when, and why?

The risks of oral contraceptives are very small, and they cluster in a subset of users, although warning signs of cardiovascular complications must be heeded. The best choice of an oral contraceptive is one with an estrogen content of 30 to 35 micrograms. A greater (50 micrograms) content may be necessary if breakthrough bleeding or amenorrhea persists beyond a few treatment cycles. The starting date for the pill can be up to the sixth day of the cycle. Noncontraceptive benefits of the pill may include a protective effect against endometrial and ovarian malignancy, benign breast disease, and infection of the upper genital tract. Both the contraceptive and noncontraceptive benefits of low-dose combination oral contraceptives are desirable. They far outweigh the risks in women who require a high-efficacy, reversible contraceptive and who have no significant contraindication to use of the pill.

Contraceptives, Oral↗

Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Contraception on trial.

When they were introduced to the world market in the 1980s, levonorgestrel subdermal implants offered the promise of an exciting alternative to traditional hormonal contraception. They provide highly effective, long-acting protection from pregnancy, without the need for user compliance. Broad acceptability of the drug has been reported throughout the world. Recently, however, the implants have met with opposition. The drug is associated with a variety of adverse effects, and removal of implants can be problematic. Serious events have been reported in women using levonorgestrel subdermal implants, although causal relationships have not been demonstrated. Additionally, concerns have been raised over the potential for coercive use of the drug. Numerous law suits have been filed alleging serious problems with implants. As a result, the drug has received considerable negative media attention. Before the controversy over levonorgestrel subdermal implants erupted, contraceptive development had declined, resulting from limitations to profits and funding, legal threats, and changes in the insurance industry. The levonorgestrel subdermal implant experience may serve to accelerate this trend. While the introduction of levonorgestrel subdermal implants offered an alternative to the current array of medical contraception, its experience may serve to dampen future contraceptive development efforts. Costly litigation and much controversy involving the implants have acted to create disincentives to further research and development of new methods of medical contraception.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Predicting contraceptive behavior among college students: the role of communication, knowledge, sexual anxiety, and self-esteem.

Undergraduate students were surveyed about their sexual behavior and contraceptive behavior. In addition, measures of their self-esteem, knowledge about contraception, communication with their dating partners, communication about sexual matters with their sexual partners, and sexual anxiety were taken. Consistent with Byrne's (1983) model of effective contraception, it was found that general and sexual communication with one's partner were significant predictors of contraception use. Directional, but statistically weak, support was obtained for the predictions that knowledge about contraception and sexual anxiety would be related to contraception use. No support was found for the prediction that general self-esteem would be associated with contraceptive behavior.

Anxiety↗

Evidence based contraceptive choices.

People who attend for contraceptive advice have usually formulated an idea of the type of contraceptive that will suit them best. They may wish to use a method that is long, short or medium acting. These are defined as follows: Long-acting method requires renewal no more frequently than every 3 months (e.g. injectable or intrauterine). Short-acting method used daily or with every act of intercourse (e.g. pills, condoms) Medium-acting method requires renewal weekly or monthly (e.g. ring, patch). For men the choice is limited to condoms or vasectomy. Some women do not wish to use hormonal preparations or have an intrauterine device (IUD) or implant inserted. There may also be cultural influences making certain methods of contraception unacceptable. Each of these factors influences the final decision of which method of contraception is decided upon. In addition to taking a full medical and sexual history to identify any risks to the individual's health, which might be increased by a particular contraceptive, time must be spent discussing the options available. It is important to ensure that there is a full understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The most successful contraceptive method is likely to be the one that the woman (or man) chooses, rather than the one the clinician chooses for them. Access for women to contraception can be improved by having convenient clinic times and service developments such as nurse prescribing and Patient Group Directions.

Choice Behavior↗

Unwanted pregnancies: understanding contraceptive use and benefits in adolescents and older women.

The highest percentages of unintended pregnancies and the largest increases in births reported in the United States in recent years were in adolescents and in women more than 35 years of age. Increasing numbers of these women will require contraception to avoid unintended pregnancy. In adolescents the combined oral contraceptive agents protect fertility indirectly and exert favorable actions on menstrual dysfunction and certain hormone-related disorders such as acne and hirsutism. To avoid sexually transmitted disease, barrier protection should be used along with oral contraceptives until mutually monogamous, stable relationships are established. Healthy older women who are nonsmokers may also safely use currently available contraceptives. These agents have little impact on metabolic parameters linked to the development of cardiovascular disease. In addition to providing reliable contraception, oral contraceptives offer noncontraceptive benefits to older reproductive-age women, including control of abnormal bleeding and a reduction in the incidence of ovarian and endometrial cancers and other gynecologic pathology. Intrauterine devices and progestin implants are safe, effective, and underused in the United States. Progestin implants may have an additional role in patients for whom estrogen preparations are contraindicated. Counseling is very important before insertion because of the high rate of nuisance side effects. The contraception selection process must consider the efficacy and acceptability of the specific method to avoid the probability of unintended pregnancy and the risk of sexually transmitted diseases.

Adolescent↗

Smoking and use of oral contraceptives: impact on thrombotic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The study was intended to evaluate the effects of oral contraceptives and smoking on the risks of arterial and venous thromboembolic diseases among young women. STUDY DESIGN: The study included a survey of data from published epidemiologic studies and evaluation of registry records of all Danish women discharged from the hospital from 1980 through 1993 after a first thromboembolic event. Questionnaires returned by survivors of such events and by control women during the period from 1994 through 1995 were analyzed. RESULTS: In the 1980-1993 data the absolute risk of thrombotic diseases was seen to increase rapidly with age-exponentially for acute myocardial infarction or cerebral thromboembolic attack, linearly for venous thromboembolism-with risks of arterial diseases exceeding those of venous diseases. In the 1994-1995 data the relative risk of thrombotic diseases was seen to increase among users of oral contraceptives irrespective of age. Risk of venous thromboembolism (but not of acute myocardial infarction or cerebral thromboembolic attack) declined as duration of current oral contraceptive use lengthened, risk of acute myocardial infarction or cerebral thromboembolic attack was significantly decreased as ethinyl estradiol doses were reduced, and the relative risk (compared with nonusers of oral contraceptives) for arterial thromboembolic disease among users of desogestrel or gestodene (in conjunction with midrange or low doses of ethinyl estradiol) was lower than the relative risk among users of second-generation progestogens (in conjunction with midrange doses of ethinyl estradiol). The combination of smoking with oral contraceptive use may have a synergistic effect on risks of acute myocardial infarction and cerebral thromboembolic attack (but not of venous thromboembolism), particularly among users of high-dose (50 micrograms) ethinyl estradiol preparations. CONCLUSION: Among the formulations currently marketed in Denmark, where only the progestins desogestrel and gestodene are available with low-dose (20 micrograms) ethinyl estradiol (and only desogestrel was available in that form at the time of our studies), we prefer these third-generation oral contraceptives for smokers. We might also consider such oral contraceptives for women >35 years old as long as they had no other risk factors for thrombotic arterial diseases.

Adolescent↗

Oral contraception and other factors in relation to hospital referral for fracture. Findings in a large cohort study.

There is good evidence that estrogens and progestogens have an important effect on bone metabolism. This article explores the relationship between oral contraceptive (OC) use and fractures occurring at various sites among the 17,032 participants in the Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study, which now includes information accumulated during 310,000 woman-years of observation between 1968 and 1994. In total, 1308 women suffered at least one fracture during the follow-up period, which was largely confined to premenopausal years. When all fractures were combined, there was a modest, but highly significant trend (p < 0.001) of increasing risk with total duration of oral contraceptive use. In addition, there was statistically significant heterogeneity (p < 0.01) when overall fracture rates were examined in relation to recency of oral contraceptive use during the premenopausal lifespan. The highest relative risk (1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5) was for current or recent oral contraceptive users; however, viewed as a whole, no clear pattern of risk was apparent. Examination of the data for individual fracture sites (including the lower end of the radius/ulna) did not provide any evidence of a protective effect of oral contraceptive use. These results are closely similar to those reported from the Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraception Study in 1993.

Adult↗

A prospective study of pregravid oral contraceptive use and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Oral contraceptive use is associated with hypertension, dyslipidemias, and insulin resistance, all of which also characterize hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In this prospective cohort study, the association of oral contraceptive use before pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was assessed. Between 1991 and 1995, 3973 nulliparous women who reported their first pregnancy lasting > or = 6 months were studied. Pregravid exposures were collected by biennial mailed questionnaires, and cases were confirmed by medical record review. Recent oral contraceptive use was defined as use within 2 years of pregnancy. Proportional hazards analysis was used to adjust for potential confounding variables. During the 4 years of follow-up, 133 (3.3%) women with gestational hypertension and 62 (1.6%) with preeclampsia were identified. Twenty-five percent of women who did not develop these disorders were recent users of oral contraceptives, compared with 19% (p = 0.11) of women who developed gestational hypertension and 30% (p = 0.38) who developed preeclampsia. Mean duration of prior oral contraceptive use was similar for cases and noncases. Compared with never and past users, the multivariate relative risk among recent users for developing gestational hypertension was 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-1.0) and for preeclampsia was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.4). Among recent users who had used oral contraceptives for > or = 8 years, the relative risk for gestational hypertension was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.2) and for preeclampsia was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-4.2). When the analysis was restricted to women who had never smoked, the risk for gestational hypertension was 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.9) and for preeclampsia was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.9-8.7). Thus, recent use of oral contraceptives was associated with a reduced risk for developing gestational hypertension. In contrast, there was a suggestion that recent use was associated with an increased risk of developing preeclampsia, but only among women who had used these agents for > or = 8 years.

Adult↗

Dinitrochlorobenzene sensitisation test in women on hormonal contraceptives.

Cell-mediated immunity was measured in women on hormonal contraceptives using the 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (D.N.C.B.) sensitisation test. Three groups of women were studied: forty-eight women were taking oral contraceptives of combined oestrogen/progestogen (thirty-seven of them had used oral contraceptives for a year or longer); twelve women were using a sequential pill (ethinyloestradiol and megestrolacetate); and sixteen women had received intramuscular injections of medroxyprogesterone acetate. The results were compared with those of a control group of twenty-nine age-matched women not taking contraceptive steroids. In women on the combined contraceptive pill and those who had received intramuscular progesterone, mean D.N.C.B. reactivity was significantly increased. The results were even more striking in women who had used combined contraceptive pills for more than one year. These results do not accord with the previously reported decrease in cell-mediated immunity in women on hormonal contraceptives.

Adolescent↗

[Update on contraception].

Since the introduction of hormonal contraceptives in the 1960s, great advances have been achieved in contraception. Biological effects of sexual steroids as well as risks and benefits of oral contraception are better estimated. After the development of a new hormone-containing intra-uterine system, new hormone delivery systems offer women safe and effective contraceptive options. These new options that combine high efficacy and ease of use should allow better acceptance and compliance than daily pill ingestion and should then reduce the high rate of unintended pregnancies terminated by elective abortion. Transdermal contraceptive system and vaginal ring offer a promising innovative approach in pregnancy prevention. Subdermal implants give women the choice of a highly effective contraceptive system in spite of significant side effects. New hormonal delivery systems such as injectables are under development. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization is now also available and is a very effective procedure. This wide variety of new contraceptive methods offers a marked improvement from previous medications for users by providing better efficacy and tolerability.

Adolescent↗

Update on adolescent contraception.

Recent advances in OCPs include less androgenic progestins and lower doses of ethinyl estradiol. All low-dose OCPs are safe in terms of venous thrombosis risk in appropriately chosen patients. DMPA is a safe and effective long-acting contraceptive agent; clinical attention should be directed to its most common side effect, irregular bleeding. DMPA does not seem to affect mood, and it is uncertain what impact it has on weight changes. More research needs to be conducted on its impact on adolescent bone metabolism. Norplant continues to be the only subdermal contraceptive implant marketed in the United States. It provides safe and effective contraception and has the best continuation rate of all types of hormonal contraception. Its most common side effect is irregular bleeding. Norplant may be especially well suited for adolescents who have recently been pregnant or who are not tolerating other types of contraception. Emergency postcoital contraception continues to be underused in the United States, with a lack of awareness among patients and clinicians. Mechanisms of action include a delay in ovulation and interference with implantation. Research and public health groups are striving to increase patient and provider awareness and use of emergency contraception.

Adolescent↗

Effects of oral contraceptives on vascular endothelium in premenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Premenopausal women are protected against atherosclerosis by high plasma estrogen levels, which have been suggested to augment endothelial nitric oxide synthesis and to improve endothelial function. In contrast, premenopausal use of oral contraceptives is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. We investigated the influence of oral contraception on endothelial function. STUDY DESIGN: Sixteen healthy premenopausal women with a mean age (+/-SD) of 27 +/- 3 years, 8 of whom used oral contraceptives and 8 of whom did not, were examined in a case-control study. Forearm plethysmography was used to measure changes of forearm blood flow in response to intra-arterial infusion of increasing doses of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine. RESULTS: Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (change from baseline after acetylcholine 48 microg/min) was similar between women with (828% +/- 137%) and without oral contraception (701% +/- 114%; P not significant), as was endothelium-independent vasodilatation (change from baseline after sodium nitroprusside 3200 ng/min, 271% +/- 38% vs 289% +/- 23%; P not significant). In contrast, inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine induced a significantly more marked decrease in blood flow among women with oral contraception than among those without at all dosages (change from baseline after 4-micromol/min N (G)-monomethyl-L -arginine, -26% +/- 3% vs -14% +/- 5%; P =.009 by analysis of variance). CONCLUSION: Stimulated nitric oxide bioavailability remained unaffected in a group of premenopausal women receiving oral contraceptives. In contrast, basal nitric oxide production and release appeared to be enhanced by oral contraceptive use.

Acetylcholine↗

Oral contraceptive use and risk of gestational trophoblastic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic disease refers to a spectrum of rare benign and malignant gynecologic disorders whose pathogenesis is not well understood. Recent studies from China and the United States have raised the hypothesis that long-term use of oral contraceptives before conception may increase the risk of gestational trophoblastic tumors. A multicenter case-control study of gestational trophoblastic tumors was undertaken to test this hypothesis. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with 235 case patients, including 50 with gestational choriocarcinoma, and 413 control subjects matched on recentness of pregnancy, age at pregnancy, and area of residence. Relative risks (odds ratios) were computed by conditional logistic regression. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The relative risk estimate for ever having used oral contraceptives before the index pregnancy was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.0), and the risk increased with duration of use (P for trend = .05). The estimate was highest for women who used oral contraceptives during the cycle in which they became pregnant (relative risk = 4.0; 95% CI=1.6-10), but there was no consistent pattern according to the time interval since last use. Separate analyses of choriocarcinoma and persistent mole yielded similar results, i.e., the relative risk estimates for oral contraceptive use were 2.2 (95% CI=0.8-6.4) and 1.8 (95% CI=1.0-3.0), respectively. Control for the number of sexual partners, which was independently associated with risk (P for trend = .05), did not materially change the results. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest to date, indicates that long duration of oral contraceptive use before conception increases the risk of gestational trophoblastic tumors. These findings may provide clues to the pathogenesis of this rare disease. Changes in use of oral contraceptives are not warranted, however, because the incidence attributable to oral contraceptive use is very low.

Adult↗

Oral contraceptive agents and breast cancer: a population-based case-control study.

In this population-based case-control study that was conducted in Adelaide, South Australia, and which involved 395 case subjects and 386 control subjects who were aged 20 years to 69 years, the adjusted relative risk of breast cancer for women who had ever used oral contraceptive agents was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.60). Relative risks that were associated with use of oral contraceptive agents for one month to 18 months and for 19 months or more before a first pregnancy were 1.09 (95% CI, 0.45-2.62) and 1.67 (95% CI, 0.63-4.42), respectively, but the trend was not statistically significant. Relatively-little variation in risk was found in association with the total duration of the use of oral contraceptive agents and with years since the first and the last use of oral contraceptive agents. When the risk of breast cancer in association with the use of oral contraceptive agents was examined across levels of risk factors of breast cancer (history of benign breast disease, family history of breast cancer and parity), the only relative risk which deviated markedly from unity was that which was associated with use of oral contraceptive agents in women with a history of benign breast disease; however, the relative risk of 1.77 (95% CI, 0.35-8.97) was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the results of this study support those of the majority of previous studies in showing no overall relationship between the use of oral contraceptive agents and the risk of breast cancer.

Adult↗