Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BANDAGING AND DRESSING”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources
PubMed1982

[Autoradiographic and electron microscopic studies of the effect of Soviet dressing materials on experimental wound healing].

Autoradiography and scanning electron microscopy were-used to assess new Soviet dressing materials in experiments on rats. It was shown that the two-layer nonwoven atraumatic material, caproic gauze, a modified surface active agent and kombutek-11 exert favourable effects on the regenerative processes in the wounds and promote more rapid wound healing as compared with a conventional cotton-gauze bandage. It is advisable to devise dressing materials possessing wound-healing action similar to kombutek-11.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

The newer surgical dressings and wound healing.

In summary, there are a variety of new synthetic surgical dressing materials available today. Although individual physician preferences and differences in the type of injury may determine which of these membranes is utilized in a given clinical situation, they all serve to speed the rate of epithelialization, to decrease motion within the healing wound, to decrease postoperative pain, and to minimize the potential for bleeding and infection. For all of these reasons, a complete knowledge of these dressings and their uses will greatly enhance the surgeon's ability to care more satisfactorily for the patient with a cutaneous wound.

Bandages↗
PubMed1986

Comparison of two occlusive bandages in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

A randomized controlled study was performed in 34 patients with venous leg ulcers. No difference was found in the healing rate between a new hydrocolloid dressing plus compression, and a double layer bandage, consisting of an inner paste bandage (i.e. a stocking impregnated with zinc oxide paste) and an outer elastic bandage. The parameters chosen for objective evaluation were stereophotogrammetric measurement of ulcer area and volume, and bacterial counts.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Closed-catheter drainage after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer may constitute a significant inconvenience to the recovering patient, and may also serve as portals of entry for bacteria. Any intervention that could reduce the volume and duration of postoperative drainage would be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an external compression dressing after ALND would decrease postoperative drainage, afford earlier drain removal, and reduce subsequent seroma formation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-five women undergoing definitive surgical treatment for breast cancer were randomized to receive a compression dressing (n = 66) or standard dressing (n = 69). They were also stratified for modified radical mastectomy (MRM; n = 74) or breast conservation therapy (BCT; n = 61). All patients had ALND. The compression dressing consisted of a circumferential chest wrap of two 6-inch Ace bandages, held in place by circumferential Elastoplast bandage, and it was applied by the same nurse. This dressing remained intact until postoperative day 4. Patients in the standard dressing group (control) were fitted with a front-fastening Surgibra only. Drains were removed when the total daily amount was <50 cc. Postoperative drainage volume, total days with drain, and frequency of seroma formation were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: After 4 days, wound drainage in both groups was nearly identical (compression = 490 cc, standard = 517 cc; P = 0.48). Total days with drain were also similar (compression = 6.4 days, standard = 6.1 days; P = 0.69). The compression dressing did not reduce seroma formation. In fact, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of seroma aspirations per patient in the compression group (compression = 2.9, standard = 1.8; P <0.01). The increase in seroma aspirations was more significant in MRM patients (compression = 3.1, standard = 1.7; P <0.01) than in BCT patients (compression = 2.6, standard = 1.8; P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: External compression dressing fails to decrease postoperative drainage and may increase the incidence of seroma formation after drain removal. Thus, routine use of a compression dressing to reduce postoperative drainage after ALND for breast cancer is not warranted.

Axilla↗
PubMed2005

Interface dressings influence the delivery of topical negative-pressure therapy.

BACKGROUND: Topical negative-pressure therapy is a widely used wound management system that generates a negative pressure at the wound surface through a foam pad, which aids in wound stimulation through mechanical forces on the wound bed. System guidelines state that the foam dressing should be placed in direct apposition with the wound surface; however, an interface dressing is often inserted at this point to promote comfort at dressing changes. METHODS: Topical negative-pressure dressings were applied to 40 healthy volunteers. Pressures at the skin surface under the dressing were recorded and compared with those measured by a topical negative-pressure machine using the Therapeutic Regulated Accurate Care pad system. These were repeated, inserting different types of interface dressings: petroleum jelly (Vaseline)-impregnated gauze, nonadherent silicone dressing, and mylar polyester film dressing. RESULTS: Pressures recorded at the skin interface with no interface dressing were close to those set on the topical negative-pressure machine (mean pressure change, -5.11 +/- 0.55 mmHg). Interposition of dressings at the skin/foam interface affected pressure transmission through the foam, and some caused significant decreases in pressures recorded at the skin surface (e.g., Vaseline-impregnated gauze: mean pressure change, -11.76 mmHg; maximum pressure change, -41 mmHg). CONCLUSION: The loss in negative pressure means that pressures designated by the machine cannot be relied on as a measure of wound pressure when certain dressings are used at the interface. This could be important in determining the outcome of some wounds under topical negative-pressure therapy treatment.

Bandages↗
PubMed2006

The use of gauze: will it ever change?

Although the benefits of healing in a moist environment have been published worldwide, the use of woven gauze as a wound contact material still prevails in many countries. This article traces the history of gauze and problems associated with usage against the introduction of one of the first modern materials, the hydrocolloid. Why this revolution in dressing material did not herald an immediate change of practice away from gauze is examined. Since the 1970s, the range, availability and sophistication of these and other moisture-retentive dressings have increased dramatically, and yet it seems that some practitioners remain unconvinced. The processes that underpin personal and organisational change that may contribute to this reluctance are also considered.

Bandages↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of Urgotol plus K-Four compression for venous leg ulcers.

In this non-comparative clinical evaluation, 36 subjects with venous leg ulcers, 85% of which were indolent or deteriorating, were treated with Urgotul lipidocolloid wound dressing and the K-Four multilayer compression bandaging system for 12 weeks or to healing--whichever occurred first. Results show that Urgotul was an ideal dressing in combination with K-Four, being easy to apply (98.7%) and remove (98.1%), and largely pain-free (95.6%) and non-adherent (99.7%). In a patient group of "hard-to-heal" ulcers, 50% of the ulcers healed within the treatment period. Ulcers not healed after 12 weeks achieved almost 50% area reduction on average. The treatment combination proved safe, with only one of seven adverse events reported being probably related to the products used. This study supports the use of a combination of Urgotul dressing and K-Four compression to provide a "matched" treatment for venous leg ulcers.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Preliminary observations on clotting under three hydrocolloid dressings.

Four patients with five wounds were randomly assigned to treatment with three occlusive dressings: DuoDERM, Restore and Comfeel Ulcus; the dressings were left intact for 24-48 h. When the dressings were removed, it was found that wounds that had been covered with Restore and Comfeel contained coagulated sanguinous material. Two wounds that had been covered with Comfeel and Restore, respectively, were then covered with DuoDERM, while one wound previously covered with DuoDERM was covered with Restore. Either no clotting occurred under DuoDERM or clots may have resolved. Although these preliminary data suggest that DuoDERM gel may have fibrinolytic properties, more extensive and controlled studies are needed to assess the characteristics of this dressing.

Bandages, Hydrocolloid↗
PubMed2004

[Development of new biologically active dressings and methodology of their use].

Results of development of new biologically active dressings and up-to-date methodology of local treatment of wounds (based on their differential application according to phase and features of wound process) are demonstrated. Data about main properties and specific activity of new biologically active dressings based on natural and synthetic polymers with immobilized drugs are presented. Future trends and efficacy of their appliance in complex treatment of purulent and necrotic wounds are demonstrated.

Acrylates↗
PubMed2004

Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.

BACKGROUND: Many different wound dressings and topical applications are used to cover surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. It is not known whether these dressings heal wounds at different rates. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of dressings and topical agents on surgical wounds healing by secondary intention SEARCH STRATEGY: We sought relevant trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases in March 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility for inclusion was confirmed by two reviewers who independently judged the methodological quality of the trials according to the Dutch Cochrane Centre list of factors relating to internal and external validity. Two reviewers summarised data from eligible studies using a data extraction sheet, any disagreements were referred to a third reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen reports of 13 RCTs on dressings or topical agents for postoperative wounds healing by secondary intention were identified. WOUND HEALING: Whilst a single small trial of aloe vera supplementation vs gauze suggests delayed healing with aloe vera, the results of this trial are un interpretable since there was a large differential loss to follow up. A plaster cast applied to an amputation stump accelerated wound healing compared with elastic compression, WMD -25.60 days, 95% CI -49.08 to -2.12 days (1 trial). There were no statistically significant differences in healing for other dressing comparisons (e.g. gauze, foam, alginate; 11 trials). PAIN: Gauze was associated with significantly more pain for patients than other dressings (4 trials). PATIENT SATISFACTION: Patients treated with gauze were less satisfied compared with those receiving alternative dressings (3 trials). COSTS: Gauze is inexpensive but its use is associated with the use of significantly more nursing time than foam (2 trials). LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY: Four trials showed no difference in length of hospital stay. One trial found shorter hospital stay in people after amputation when plaster casts were applied compared with elastic compression (WMD -30.10 days; 95% CI -49.82 to -10.38). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: We found only small, poor quality trials; the evidence is therefore insufficient to determine whether the choice of dressing or topical agent affects the healing of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Foam is best studied as an alternative for gauze and appears to be preferable as to pain reduction, patient satisfaction and nursing time.

Bandages↗