Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

[To resolve the difficulties of entering into the aortic dissections' true lumen in endovascular graft exclusion].

OBJECTIVE: To review the methods about resolving the difficulties of entering into the aortic dissections' true lumen in endovascular graft exclusion. METHODS: The patients who had Stanford B type thoracic aortic dissection and been treated with endovascular graft exclusion from September 1998 to February 2004 were reviewed. The operations performed under DSA surveillance. In the operation, the wire was difficult to enter into the true lumen of the aortic dissection in 28 cases, and was wrong into the false lumen then into the true lumen in 4 cases. Five methods were used to resolve these problems, including catheter smoking technique, different position projection, left brachial artery puncture proximal guide-wire floating technique, arterial choice of entering into the true lumen and guide-wire transfixion between proximal and distal. RESULTS: The method of catheter smoking technique was used in 32 cases, different position projection in 12 cases, left brachial artery puncture proximal guide-wire floating technique in 10 cases, arterial choice of entering into the true lumen in 28 cases, and guide-wire transfixion between proximal and distal in 2 cases. The wires were ultimately successful to enter the true lumen and the stent-grafts excluded successfully the tears of the aortic dissections in 32 cases. CONCLUSION: The difficulty of entering into the true lumen and the wrong way into the false lumen could lead to losing the operation, even a disaster. The problem could be resolved by some methods of endovascular techniques.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Diagnostic delay and outcome in surgery for type A aortic dissection.

Twenty-two patients with acute type A aortic dissection presented to this hospital over a three-year period. The initial diagnosis was incorrect in 12 (54.5 per cent) and in 11 of these the error occurred in peripheral hospitals before referral. This diagnostic mistake lead to a delay in surgical treatment of 2-9 days (median 5 days). Three deaths occurred without surgery, and two of these could have been considered for repair if the correct diagnosis had been made earlier. In the surgically treated group, a 30-day survival of 16 out of 19 (84.2 per cent) was achieved and the three deaths were all related to late referral. Two died because of bowel infarction and one because of respiratory failure. An increased general awareness of acute aortic dissection is necessary as early diagnosis, before the onset of irreversible ischaemic events, allows a high surgical success rate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Transapical aortic cannulation for acute aortic dissection to prevent malperfusion and cerebral complications.

We describe a technique for transapical cannulation in cases of acute aortic dissection. This method entails aortic cannulation via the apex of the left ventricle and the aortic valve. When this technique is used, retrograde perfusion prevents such fatal complications as malperfusion or cerebral embolism that can occur with femoral cannulation. Having found no disadvantage in this method, we recommend transapical cannulation as the best cannulation technique for acute aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

[Long-term surgical results of acute aortic dissection].

Between 1988 and 1997, 69 patients underwent surgery for acute aortic dissection: 65 patients had an acute type A (AcA) and 8 an acute type B (AcB) aortic dissection. The hospital mortalities were 16.9% for AcA and 25% for AcB. Actuarial survival rates including hospital deaths after 5 and 8 years were 70% and 58% for AcA patients and no late death or cardiovascular event occurred in AcB patients during follow-up periods. Freedom from cardiovascular events was 88% and 70% at 5 and 8 years, and freedom from reoperation was 94% at 5 and 8 years for operative survivors of AcA. There were no differences on actuarial survival rates between ascending aortic repair and arch repair, ringed-graft and suture anastomosis, and postoperatively patent false lumen and closed false lumen. There were no differences on freedom from cardiovascular events between ascending aortic repair and arch repair, and ringed-graft and suture anastomosis, however, patients with postoperatively patent false lumen showed significantly lower freedom from cardiovascular events registering 85% and 59% at 5 and 8 years compared with 94% at 5 and 8 years in patients with closed false lumen.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Endovascular stent-graft placement for complications of acute type B aortic dissection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the concepts and current clinical results of endovascular stent-graft placement for acute complicated type B aortic dissection. RECENT FINDINGS: The optimal treatment for patients with dissections confined to the descending aorta (Stanford type B-AD) remains a matter of debate. Usually, antihypertensive medical therapy with strict blood pressure lowering below 135/80 mm Hg represents the first choice for patients with uncomplicated type B-AD. Patients with acute complicated type B-AD remain a major therapeutic challenge because surgery of the descending aorta is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. In 1999, endovascular stent-graft placement was introduced as a novel, less invasive treatment option for patients with type B aortic dissection. Current indications include acute (contained) aortic rupture, symptomatic ischemic branch vessel involvement, early aortic expansion, or unrelenting pain. So far, few studies on stent-graft placement in patients with acute complicated aortic dissection have been published reporting an early mortality between 0 and approximately 20%. SUMMARY: To date, there is limited experience with endovascular stent-graft placement for acute complicated type B aortic dissection demonstrating its feasibility and life-saving potential. The endovascular approach can avoid the major trauma of open surgery and should help to get patients out of the acute life-threatening phase of the disease; however, long-term results are needed to assess the durability of this treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

The role of coronary angiography in acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, non-invasive methods have replaced angiography in the diagnosis of aortic dissection. Angiography maybe used to evaluate coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), which can delay surgery and increase the risk of rupture. We set out to examine the role of angiography in acute aortic dissection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent repair of acute aortic dissection between January 1992 and June 2002 was conducted. The effect of angiography on the need for concomitant coronary artery surgery (CABG), delay to surgery and outcome were analysed. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were identified. Initial diagnosis was established by non-invasive techniques. Twenty-three patients (31%) underwent angiography (Group I) in three this was unsuccessful. Three in Group I and four in the non-angiography group (Group II, n=51) had history of angina. One patient in Group I underwent concomitant CABG compared to seven in Group II. The patient who underwent CABG in Group I; and four out of seven in Group II died (NS). Patients who underwent concomitant CABG had a significantly higher mortality rate (P=0.04). Mortality in Group I was 35% (n=8) and in Group II was 29% (n=15) (NS). Mortality rate was also significantly higher in patients who presented with syncope (P=0.01) or hypotension (P=0.04). Median transfer time from arrival at our centre to the operating room was 5 h in Group I and 1.5 h in Group II (P<0.001). Mortality rate was higher in patients who took longer to transfer to the operating room, but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that coronary angiography did not affect the occurrence of CABG and was not associated with improved hospital survival. Furthermore, there is a considerable delay to surgery caused by angiography. Therefore in this setting coronary angiography is not recommended.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

A rapid bedside D-dimer assay (cardiac D-dimer) for screening of clinically suspected acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: A rapid laboratory test for diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (AAD) has not been available. We performed this prospective study to determine the utility of a rapid bedside D-dimer (DD) assay for detection of AAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with suspected AAD were recruited and their DD levels were measured by rapid bedside assay. They were divided into 2 groups according to enhanced computed tomography findings: an AAD group (n = 30) and a non-AAD group (n = 48). The median DD level was higher in the AAD group (1.80 microg/ml) than in the non-AAD group (0.42 microg/ml) (p = 0.000). The rapid bedside DD assay showed 100% sensitivity, 54% specificity, 58% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value for detection of AAD with a normal DD level of up to 0.5 microg/ml. The combination of DD level >0.5 microg/ml and systolic blood pressure > or = 180 mmHg showed 86% positive predictive value for detection of AAD. Conclusions We conclude that the rapid bedside DD assay is a highly sensitive method for early exclusion of AAD in patients with chest and/or back pain suggestive of AAD. Acute aortic dissection is highly probable if a rapid DD assay shows the elevated DD level with systolic blood pressure > or = 180 mmHg on admission.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

A case of aortic dissection with transient ST-segment elevation due to functional left main coronary artery obstruction.

A 48-year-old man with a history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus was hospitalized with sudden onset of severe chest pain. He was in cardiogenic shock with a systolic pressure of 60 mm Hg. His electrocardiogram (ECG) showed ST-segment elevation in the precordial leads suggestive of acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction. The ST-segment returned to baseline after the systolic blood pressure rose to 100 mm Hg with the administration of sympathomimetic agents. Aortography and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated type A aortic dissection and aortic regurgitation. Aortography and short-axis transesophageal echocardiography showed during diastole almost complete collapse of the true lumen of the ascending aorta caused by the intimal flap. The patient underwent surgical repair of the aortic dissection and implantation of Palmaz stents in the carotid arteries. Decreased blood pressure and the presence of aortic regurgitation accelerated the collapse of the true lumen during diastole in the ascending aorta, resulting in functional obstruction of the left main coronary artery, which may have been related to ST-segment changes in this case.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1994

Acute type A aortic dissection--diagnostic aspects and surgical experience.

Acute type A aortic dissection was surgically treated in 33 patients aged 20-65 years, all critically ill on admission to hospital. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed pericardiac tamponade in eight cases of extreme emergency, indicating surgery without need of additional imaging. Transesophageal echocardiography provided a definitive diagnosis in 16 cases, with excellent reliability and no false positive findings. Composite graft replacement with button technique was used in 24 patients and other methods of repair in nine. The perioperative mortality was 12% (4/33) and the late mortality 7% (2/29). The actuarial 5-year survival rate was 73%. No aortic root reoperation was required during follow-up for a mean of 4 years. Transesophageal echocardiography proved to be an accurate tool for speedy diagnosis of acute type A aortic dissection and open composite graft replacement with button technique highly satisfactory treatment, avoiding late aortic root problems.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Incidence and predictors of large-artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-artery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based study over 50 years.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and predictors of large-artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-artery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: The cohort of all residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, in whom GCA was diagnosed between January 1, 1950, and December 31, 1999, was followed up. The incidence of aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and large-artery stenosis was determined. Possible predictors and correlates of large-artery complication were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-six incident cases of large-artery complication (representing 27% of the 168 patients in the cohort) were identified. These included 30 incident cases (18%) of aortic aneurysm and/or aortic dissection. Of these cases, 18 (11%) involved the thoracic aorta, with aortic dissection developing in 9 (5%). There were 21 incident cases (13%) of large-artery stenosis. Fifteen patients (9%) had incident cervical artery stenosis, and 6 (4%) had incident subclavian/axillary/brachial artery stenosis. One patient (0.6%) had incident iliac/femoral artery stenosis attributable to GCA. Hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease were associated with aortic aneurysm and/or dissection (P < 0.05 for both). Cranial symptoms (headache, scalp tenderness, abnormal temporal arteries) were negatively associated with large-artery stenosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.10 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.03-0.35, P < 0.0005]), as was a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.67-0.95, P < 0.05] per 10 mm/hour). CONCLUSION: Large-artery complication is common in GCA. Increased awareness of large-artery complication in GCA, particularly early-occurring aortic dissection, may decrease associated mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Abdominal aortic dissection with acute mesenteric ischemia in a patient with Marfan syndrome.

Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder of connective tissue, with various complications manifested primarily in the cardiovascular system. It potentially leads to aortic dissection and rupture, these being the major causes of death. We report a patient who complained of acute abdominal pain, which presented as acute mesenteric ischemia combined with abdominal aortic dissection. Echocardiography showed enlargement of the aortic root and mitral valve prolapse. Abdominal computed tomography scan revealed acute mesenteric ischemia due to abdominal aortic dissection. Finally, the patient underwent surgery of aortic root replacement and had a successful outcome. Therefore, we suggest that for optimal risk assessment and monitoring of patients with Marfan syndrome, both aortic stiffness and the diameter of the superior mesenteric vein compared with that of the superior mesenteric artery are useful screening methods to detect acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to abdominal aortic dissection. Early diagnosis and early treatment can decrease the high mortality rate of patients with Marfan syndrome.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Acute aortic dissection involving an aberrant right subclavian artery.

Although the aberrant right subclavian artery is the most common abnormality in aortic arch development, it is unusual to encounter this abnormality when repairing acute aortic dissection. We report a case of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection involving an aberrant right subclavian artery in a 45-year-old man. We used the elephant trunk procedure to surgically manage the intimal tear and aberrant right subclavian artery. This is, to our knowledge, the first report in Japan of surgical reconstruction of an aberrant right subclavian artery in conjunction with acute aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Outlook of non operated type B aortic dissection with special reference to the incidence of degenerative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). One center study.

OBJECTIVES: to determine the value of pharmacological treatment of type B aortic dissection (B AD) in face of new forms of treatment. DESIGN: this is a retrospective study of the period from 1990 to 2000. Files of 81 patients have been reviewed and completed by questionnaires. RESULTS: Two B AD died after admission without any treatment, 10 were operated on with 7 discharged alive (group I); 69 received hypotensive agents and beta-blockers, 65 were discharged alive (group II). Late mortality of the group I is 3/7, not related with B AD. Late mortality after mean follow-up of 56.8 months is 27/65 with 4/27 related to B AD (4 ruptures, 2 operated on). Non fatal secondary surgery amounts 5 in 4 patients. Total B AD aortic events comprise 8/65 patients. Type A AD were operated on successfully (8 : 4 before B AD, and 4 after B AD). Degenerative abdominal aortic aneurysms were present, operated (9) or not (3), in the history of patients and 3 more appear subsequently. At 10 years, actuarial survival is 40% +/- 18. CONCLUSION: in non-complicated cases of B AD, medical treatment is a reasonable choice, provided that a strict follow-up of the thoracic abdominal aorta is performed.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

[Aortic dissection and pregnancy. Apropos of a case].

Aortic dissection is a serious disease which rarely affects young women. In this context, it occurs in nearly one out of two cases during pregnancy, usually during the third term. The authors report acute dissection of the ascending aorta (de Bakey type 2) during pregnancy for which rapid cardiothoracic surgical management as a semi-emergency resulted in a favourable outcome for mother and child.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Constrictive pericarditis with dissecting aortic aneurysm (DeBakey type II)].

We experienced a case of constrictive pericarditis with dissecting aortic aneurysm (DeBakey type II). The patient complained of orthopnea and leg edema. The cause of constrictive pericarditis was pericardial effusion due to dissecting aortic aneurysm. Ascending aortic replacement with graft and decortication of thickened pericardium were performed. We confirmed the decrease of CVP and PAP intraoperatively. Postoperative course was uneventful.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[The effect of intraoperative high-dose tranexamic acid on blood loss after operation for acute aortic dissection].

The effect of high dose tranexamic acid on blood loss after operations for acute aortic dissection was evaluated. Twenty-eight patients undergoing emergent operations for acute aortic dissection were studied. There were two groups, group T with 13 patients (group T) who were given 7 g of tranexamic acid after induction of anesthesia and 3 g of it after CPB and group C with 15 patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. There was a tendency that group T had less bleeding during operation and after operation (559.6 +/- 865.8 ml in group T and 805.8 +/- 442.9 ml in group C, 1719.2 +/- 1008.7 ml in group T and 3547.7 +/- 4580.1 ml in group C, respectively), but there was no significant difference between two groups. The removal of drainage tubes after operation was significantly earlier in group T (5.0 +/- 2.3 post operative day in group T and 8.1 +/- 5.2 post operative day in group C; p < 0.05). FDP and D-dimer level as measures of fibrinolytic activity were elevated at pre- and postoperative period in both groups, but they tended to be lower in group T at postoperative period. One patient required reexploration because of excessive bleeding and no mediastinal infection was reported in group T, whereas 4 patients underwent reexploration and 2 patients developed mediastinitis in group C. There were 5 hospital death (33.3%) in group C and 2 (15.4%) in group T. High dose of tranexamic acid seems to control fibrinolytic activity, thereby reducing blood loss and requirements, which may contribute to lower morbidity and mortality in operations for acute aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Does profound hypothermic circulatory arrest improve survival in patients with acute type a aortic dissection?

OBJECTIVE: No evidence exists that profound hypothermic circulatory arrest (PHCA) improves survival or reduces the likelihood of distal aortic reoperation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Records of 307 patients with acute type A aortic dissection from 1967 to 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. The influence of repair using PHCA (n=121) versus without PHCA (n=186) on death and freedom from distal aortic reoperation was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression models. Propensity score analysis identified a subset of 152 comparable patients in 3 quintiles (QIII-V) in which the effects of PHCA (n=113) versus no PHCA (n=39) were further compared. RESULTS: For all patients, 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival estimates were 81+/-2%, 74+/-3%, and 63+/-3% (+/-1 SE). Survival rates and actual freedom from distal aortic reoperation was not significantly different between treatment methods in the entire patient cohort nor in the matched patients in quintiles III-V. Treatment method was not associated with differences in early major complications, late survival, or distal aortic reoperation rates in the entire patient sample or in quintiles III-V. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic repair with or without circulatory arrest was associated with comparable early complications, survival, and distal aortic reoperation rates in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Despite the lack of concrete evidence favoring the use of PHCA, it does no harm, and most of our group uses PHCA regularly because of its practical technical advantages and theoretical potential merit.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

[Differential cooling and perfusion: a reasonably safe method of systemic organ protection during surgery for acute type A aortic dissection].

During surgery for acute type A aortic dissection we have developed a new technique of cerebral and systemic organ protection according to susceptibility to ischemic damage. After cardiopulmonary bypass is established, patient is cooled to the rectal temperature of 30 degrees C. Then cardiopulmonary bypass is temporarily discontinued, the ascending aorta is opened, and myocardial protection is achieved by retrograde coronary sinus cold blood cardioplegia. To perform distal open repair, all 3 brachiocephalic arteries are cannulated with 13 F balloon catheters through the aortic lumen, and perfused with cold blood (12 degrees C) (10 ml/kg/min), while an additional larger balloon catheter (24 F) is inserted in the true lumen of the descending aorta, and systemic perfusion with warmer blood (28 degrees C) (1-2 l/min) is started. When the distal repair is completed, cardiopulmonary bypass is resumed and the systemic rewarming is started, meanwhile proximal repair is accomplished. Between December 1993 and August 1994, 10 patients were operated on with this method. Mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 182 minutes (113 to 290), and mean duration of DCP was 63 minutes (18 to 130). Operative mortality was 10% (1/10). The technique of "differential cooling and perfusion" has been demonstrated to provide excellent cerebral and visceral protection and to minimize drawbacks associated with deep hypothermic methods necessitating prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass.

Acute Disease↗