Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “epigenetic modification”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55Linked to original sources

Reading signals on the nucleosome with a new nomenclature for modified histones.

The tails of the four core histones are exposed on the nucleosome surface, where they are subject to a variety of enzyme-catalyzed, post-translational modifications. Modifications, singly or in combination, provide a source of information that can be used for signal transduction during ongoing processes, such as transcription, or as heritable epigenetic marks. A nomenclature is presented that allows patterns of histone modification to be clearly and unambiguously specified and that should facilitate discussion of their functional roles.

Animals↗

Epigenetic reduction OF H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 by RK-701 and GSK 126 improves the developmental competence of bovine SCNT embryos.

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) failure has largely been attributed to incomplete epigenetic reprogramming, particularly the dysregulation of repressive histone modifications such as H3K9me3 and H3K27me3. Reducing these repressive marks has been shown to improve reprogramming efficiency in SCNT embryos. Although histone demethylase mRNA injection has been used for this purpose, it is labor-intensive, technically demanding, and time-consuming. In this study, we investigated a simplified approach that combined RK-701 and GSK-126 to reduce H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 levels, respectively, in bovine SCNT embryos. Three experimental groups were established: IVF embryos (control), SCNT-control (SCNT-C) embryos, and inhibitor-treated SCNT embryos (SCNT-T). The IVF group was used as a reference standard. Fused one-cell SCNT embryos were treated with 2&#x202f;&#x3bc;M RK-701 and 0.2&#x202f;&#x3bc;M GSK-126 from the one-cell stage to the 16-cell stage. Gene expression analysis at the 16-cell stage revealed a significant reduction in histone methyltransferase (HMT) expression (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05), and immunofluorescence analysis confirmed marked decreases in H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 levels. In addition, the expression of genes associated with zygotic genome activation (ZGA) and pluripotency was significantly higher in SCNT-T embryos than in SCNT-C embryos. Assessment of blastocyst quality revealed reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, decreased expression of apoptosis-related genes, and improved mitochondrial membrane potential in the treated group, as indicated by JC1 staining. Overall, this approach effectively reduced repressive histone marks, enhanced epigenetic reprogramming, and improved ZGA, thereby increasing the developmental rate and adhesion potential of bovine SCNT embryos. These findings suggest that combined treatment with RK-701 and GSK-126 may provide a simple and practical strategy for improving the efficiency of bovine cloning.

Bovine embryos↗

Histone modification patterns associated with the human X chromosome.

X inactivation is associated with chromosome-wide establishment of inactive chromatin. Although this is classically regarded as facultative heterochromatin that is uniform in nature, the exact distribution of associated epigenetic marks is not well defined. Here we have analysed histone modifications in human somatic cells within two selected regions of the X chromosome. Intergenic, coding and promoter regions are segregated into differentially marked chromatin. H3K27me3 is most prominent in intergenic and silenced coding regions, but is associated with some active coding regions as well. Histone H3/H4 acetylation and H3K4me3 are locally enriched at promoter regions but do not necessarily mark continuing transcription. Remarkably, H3K9me3 is predominant in coding regions of active genes, a phenomenon that is not restricted to the X chromosome. These results argue against the exclusiveness of individual marks to heterochromatin or euchromatin, but rather suggest that composite patterns of interdependent or mutually exclusive modifications together signal the gene expression status.

Acetylation↗

DNA methylation and the expanding epigenetics of T cell lineage commitment.

During their development from progenitors, lymphocytes make a series of cell fate decisions. These decisions reflect and require changes in overall programs of gene expression. To maintain cellular identity, programs of gene expression must be iterated through mitosis in a heritable manner by epigenetic processes, which include DNA methylation, methyl-CpG-binding proteins, histone modifications, transcription factors and higher order chromatin structure. Current evidence is consistent with the notion that DNA methylation acts in concert with other epigenetic processes to limit the probability of aberrant gene expression and to stabilize, rather than to initiate, cell fate decisions. In particular, DNA methylation appears to be a non-redundant repressor of CD8 expression in TCR-gammadelta T cells and Th2 cytokine expression in Th1 and CD8 T cells, and is required to enforce clonally restricted Ly49 and KIR gene expression in NK cells. However, most of our knowledge is derived from in vitro studies, and the importance of DNA methylation in memory cell lineage fidelity in vivo remains to be shown convincingly.

Animals↗

Epigenetic changes in solid and hematopoietic tumors.

There are three connected molecular mechanisms of epigenetic cellular memory in mammalian cells: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and RNA interference. The first two have now been firmly linked to neoplastic transformation. Hypermethylation of CpG-rich promoters triggers local histone code modifications resulting in a cellular camouflage mechanism that sequesters gene promoters away from transcription factors and results in stable silencing. This normally restricted mechanism is ubiquitously used in cancer to silence hundreds of genes, among which some critically contribute to the neoplastic phenotype. Virtually every pathway important to cancer formation is affected by this process. Methylation profiling of human cancers reveals tissue-specific epigenetic signatures, as well as tumor-specific signatures, reflecting in particular the presence of epigenetic instability in a subset of cancers affected by the CpG island methylator phenotype. Generally, methylation patterns can be traced to a tissue-specific, proliferation-dependent accumulation of aberrant promoter methylation in aging tissues, a process that can be accelerated by chronic inflammation and less well-defined mechanisms including, possibly, diet and genetic predisposition. The epigenetic machinery can also be altered in cancer by specific lesions in epigenetic effector genes, or by aberrant recruitment of these genes by mutant transcription factors and coactivators. Epigenetic patterns are proving clinically useful in human oncology via risk assessment, early detection, and prognostic classification. Pharmacologic manipulation of these patterns-epigenetic therapy-is also poised to change the way we treat cancer in the clinic.

Alleles↗

Epigenetic information in chromatin: the code of entry for DNA repair.

Epigenetic changes are important etiological factors of human cancer. Epigenetic information in chromatin (known as 'histone code') is a fascinating feature used by cells to extend and modulate the genetic (DNA) code. The histone code is thus proposed to be 'read' by cells to regulate accessibility to, and functions of, chromatin DNA. While the role of the epigenetic code involving chromatin modifying/remodeling complexes in transcriptional regulation is well established, it is only recently that these mechanisms have been implicated in DNA damage detection and DNA repair. However, how the components of the DNA damage sensing and repair machinery gain access to broken DNA in compacted chromatin remains a mystery. Recent studies provide important insights into DNA damage- and repair-specific modifications to histones and shed light on how the epigenetic code controls DNA repair.

Animals↗

Molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: implications for molecular diagnosis.

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and woman in industrialized countries. Major advances have been made in our understanding of molecular events leading to formation of adenomatous polyps and cancer. Most colorectal cancers are sporadic, but a significant proportion (5-6%) has a clear genetic background. It is now widely accepted that colorectal carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving the inactivation of a variety of tumor-suppressor and DNA-repair genes and simultaneous activation of certain oncogenes. In addition, epigenetic alterations through aberrant promoter methylation and histone modification have been found to play a major role in the evolution and progression of a large proportion of sporadic colon cancers. Consequently, it is now apparent that individual colorectal cancers may evolve through diverse molecular pathways. In this article, the authors have summarized the current knowledge of molecular pathogenesis in common hereditary syndromes and sporadic forms of colorectal cancer. Novel molecular diagnostic tools for the early diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer that have emerged from these insights are discussed.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

Molecular-pathological prognostic factors of gastric cancer: a review.

Invasion and metastasis are critical determinants of cancer morbidity. Genes and molecules participating in these steps must be regarded as potential prognostic factors. Growth factors and their receptors, cell-cycle regulators, cell-adhesion molecules and matrix-degrading enzymes are those to be used as prognostic factors, including epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF receptor, K-sam, HER-2, interleukin (IL)-8, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclin E, p27, E-cadherin, CD44v6, matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). Alterations in epigenetics, such as aberrant DNA methylation and histone modification that are, in part, associated with the tumor progression of gastric cancer, can be candidate prognostic factors. The number of methylated genes may serve as a marker of tumor progression. Genetic polymorphism not only affects cancer susceptibility but also influences malignant phenotype; examples include single-nucleotide polymorphism in the HER-2 and MMP-9 genes. Comprehensive gene expression analyses are useful to search for novel genes related to invasion and metastasis and potential prognostic factors. Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) has identified several these genes, such as CDH17, APOE, FUS, COL1A1, COL1A2, GW112, and MIA. Overexpression of MIA is found to be associated with poor prognosis. Microarray analysis has great potential for identifying the characteristics of individual cancers, from the view point of gene expression profiles. A combination of these examinations can not only foretell a patient's prognosis but can also give information directly connected with personalized cancer medicine and prevention.

Gene Expression Profiling↗

Progress towards a unified theory of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, III: Circumvention of proliferation controls.

Circumvention of part of the normal controls of proliferation permits the relatively autonomous proliferation of cells which is characteristic of tumors. Several different mechanisms exist which permit circumvention of proliferation controls. RNA tumor viruses probably induce carcinogenesis by producing a viral kinase which is similar to a cAMP independent tyrosine kinase that is activated by epidermal growth factor. Circumvention of proliferation controls is permitted by modification of gene expression induced by genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms. There does not appear to be one single mechanism for circumventing proliferation controls present in all tumors. Circumvention of proliferation controls is the basic cause of carcinogenesis.

Cell Differentiation↗

Radiation-induced bystander effects, carcinogenesis and models.

Implications for carcinogenesis of radiation-induced bystander effects are both mechanistic and practical. They include induction of second cancers, perturbations to tissue social control and induction of genomic instability and delayed or immediate mutations in areas not receiving a direct deposition of energy. Bystander effects have consequences for DNA damage-mutation-cancer initiation paradigms of radiation carcinogenesis that provide the mechanistic justification for low-dose risk estimates. If carcinogenesis does not result from directly induced DNA mutations, then the carcinogenic initiation process may not simply relate to radiation dose. Modification of the preclonal state through genetic and epigenetic mechanisms may occur. To deal with the complexity of these interactions, a 'chaotic' or 'bifurcation' model invoking autopoietic theory is proposed that could accommodate both beneficial (hormetic) and harmful effects of radiation at comparable doses. Carcinogenesis may then be thought of as the result of a disturbance of the genetic/epigenetic balance occurring within the organ. Ultimate clonality may reflect domination due to selection processes rather than the initiating damage.

Animals↗

Menin regulates pancreatic islet growth by promoting histone methylation and expression of genes encoding p27Kip1 and p18INK4c.

Menin, the product of the Men1 gene mutated in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), regulates transcription in differentiated cells. Menin associates with and modulates the histone methyltransferase activity of a nuclear protein complex to activate gene expression. However, menin-dependent histone methyltransferase activity in endocrine cells has not been demonstrated, and the mechanism of endocrine tumor suppression by menin remains unclear. Here, we show that menin-dependent histone methylation maintains the in vivo expression of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors to prevent pancreatic islet tumors. In vivo expression of CDK inhibitors, including p27 and p18, and other cell cycle regulators is disrupted in mouse islet tumors lacking menin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies reveal that menin directly associates with regions of the p27 and p18 promoters and increases methylation of lysine 4 (Lys-4) in histone H3 associated with these promoters. Moreover, H3 Lys-4 methylation associated with p27 and p18 is reduced in islet tumors from Men1 mutant mice. Thus, H3 Lys-4 methylation is a crucial function of menin in islet tumor suppression. These studies suggest an epigenetic mechanism of tumor suppression: by promoting histone modifications, menin maintains transcription at multiple loci encoding cell cycle regulators essential for endocrine growth control.

Animals↗

Distinct domains in high mobility group N variants modulate specific chromatin modifications.

We have demonstrated that levels of specific modification in histone H3 are modulated by members of the nucleosome-binding high mobility group N (HMGN) protein family in a variant-specific manner. HMGN1 (but not HMGN2) inhibits the phosphorylation of both H3S10 and H3S28, whereas HMGN2 enhances H3K14 acetylation more robustly than HMGN1. Two HMGN domains are necessary for modulating chromatin modifications, a non-modification-specific domain necessary for chromatin binding and a modification-specific domain localized in the C terminus of the HMGNs. Thus, chromatin-binding structural proteins such as HMGNs affect the levels of specific chromatin modifications and therefore may play a role in epigenetic regulation.

Acetylation↗

Parental genomic imprinting.

Parental, or genomic, imprinting is a newly described form of genetic regulation, leading to the differential behavior of each parental copy of a gene. The precise mechanism responsible for the imprint, or allele-specific behavior of gene transcription, is still unclear; it is thought that modifications not involving the DNA base sequence (therefore, epigenetic as opposed to genetic) have occurred during the production of egg and sperm that mark genes according to parental origin. Several imprinted genes have been identified that also show allelic differences in cytosine methylation and in the timing of their replication during cell division; the relevance of this finding to imprinting mechanisms awaits further clarification. Despite our incomplete knowledge, the importance of the field of imprinting to the pediatrician is in its contribution to our understanding of the transmission behavior of many human diseases and syndromes, particularly those involving abnormal growth and development. Recent advances in the field will no doubt lead to more widely available diagnostic tools with potential applications as far-reaching as the investigation of unexplained fetal loss, prenatal diagnosis, and disease risk counseling.

Angelman Syndrome↗

Hypomethylation of DNA: a possible nongenotoxic mechanism underlying the role of cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

DNA methylation (i.e., the 5-methylcytosin content of DNA) plays a role in the regulation of gene activity. There is a persuasive body of evidence indicating that differential methylation of DNA (i.e., 5-methylcytosine versus cytosine) is a determinant of chromatin structure and that the methyl group provides a chemical signal that is recognized by trans-acting factors that regulate transcription. Hypomethylation (i.e., low levels of DNA 5-methylcytosine) of a gene is necessary but not sufficient for its expression, and, therefore, a hypomethylated gene can be considered to possess an increased potential for expression as compared to a hypermethylated gene. Cell proliferation is a fundamental component of carcinogenesis. It plays a key role in expanding clones of initiated cells and, in addition, cell replication may contribute to carcinogenesis by facilitating mutagenesis. This can occur either by causing the fixation of promutagenic DNA-damage before repair or as a consequence of a "normal" error occurring during DNA replication. During periods of cell proliferation the established pattern of DNA methylation is maintained by the action of a maintenance methylase following DNA replication. Changes in the methylation status of a gene provide a mechanism by which its potential for expression can be altered in an epigenetic heritable manner, and it is expected that modifications in DNA methylation would result from threshold-exhibiting events.

5-Methylcytosine↗

Mechanisms of X-chromosome inactivation.

Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation is an impressive example of epigenetic gene regulation, whereby the majority of genes on the approximately 160 Mb X chromosome are silenced in a strictly cis-limited fashion. In this review we will discuss the important players involved in the silencing process. The process is initiated by transcription and cis-localization of the non-coding XIST RNA, which then recruits many of the epigenetic features generally associated with heterochromatin, including histone modifications, histone variants and DNA methylation.

Animals↗

Epigenetic activation of tumor suppressor microRNAs in human cancer cells.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that function as endogenous post-transcriptional silencers of target genes. miRNAs are expressed in a tissue specific manner and play important roles in cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation during animal development. Recent studies have shown a distinct connection between aberrant expression of miRNAs and the development of cancer, suggesting that miRNAs can be potential therapeutic targets. Our recent study has shown that some miRNAs are controlled by epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation and histone modification in human cancer cells. Activation of tumor suppressor miRNAs by chromatin modifying drugs may cause downregulation of target oncogenes and could be a novel strategy for the prevention and treatment of human cancer.

Epigenesis, Genetic↗

Hypomethylation of DNA: a possible epigenetic mechanism involved in tumor promotion.

The overall objective of our research is to discern mechanisms that can facilitate the aberrant expression of oncogenes involved in carcinogenesis. We are testing the hypothesis that hypomethylation of DNA is a nongenotoxic mechanism underlying the aberrant expression of oncogenes involved in carcinogenesis. Hypomethylation may be a mechanism underlying the role of cell proliferation in carcinogenesis, and hypomethylation could possibly result from an enzymatic replacement of 5-methylcytosine (5MeC) with cytosine that is not linked to DNA replication. The testing of this hypothesis can serve as a focal point for a mechanism of action-oriented approach for considering key aspects of carcinogenesis: aberrant gene expression, heritable epigenetic events, species-to-species extrapolation/unique species sensitivity, tumor promotion, and thresholds. DNA methylation plays a role in the regulation of gene activity. There is a persuasive body of evidence indicating that differential methylation of DNA (i.e., 5-methylcytosine v. cytosine) is a determinant of chromatin structure and that the methyl group provides a chemical signal which is recognized by trans-acting factors that regulate transcription. Hypomethylation of a gene is necessary but not sufficient for its expression and, therefore, a hypomethylated gene can be considered to possess an increased potential for expression as compared to a hypermethylated gene. Changes in the methylation status of a gene provide a mechanism by which its potential for expression can be altered in an epigenetic heritable manner, and it is expected that modifications in DNA methylation would result from threshold-exhibiting events. Our experimental model is liver tumorigenesis, we focus upon oncogenes (e.g., Ha-ras and raf) relevant to mouse liver tumorigenesis, employ the liver tumor prone B6C3F1 (C57BL/6 x C3H/He) mouse, and make relevant comparisons with the sensitive C3H/He paternal strain and the resistant C57BL/6 maternal strain. A unique aspect of this research is that it offers the potential to provide insight regarding molecular mechanisms that underlie promotion of carcinogenesis while at the same time the results can provide the type of information that is required in order to take a more rational approach towards carcinogen risk assessment. Specifically, the practical significance of our research is that it addresses the areas of dose-response relationships, e.g., the existence of threshold-exhibiting mechanisms, and species-to-species extrapolation issues. This is discussed within the context of the requirement for a rational approach to risk assessment.

Animals↗

AI-Based 3D Heterogeneous Network Model for Functional Prediction of Epigenetics.

Human biology and diseases are the result of constantly evolving processes within an intricately complex molecular network of interactions, such as epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression that occur without alterations to the underlying DNA sequence. These changes, driven by mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs, play critical roles in regulating chromatin structure and gene activity. Epigenetic regulation offers valuable insights into biological systems, and when integrated with sophisticated analyses, it enables us to gain insights into gene regulation and cellular behavior. Here, we describe an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model that is capable of generating 3-dimensional (3D) heterogeneous network by integrating multimodal data for the functional prediction of epigenetic mechanisms, emphasizing its applications in medicine, developmental biology, and personalized therapeutics. Heterogeneous networks in biology are powerful tools for understanding the complex interactions and interdependencies within biological systems. Key advancements in AI and multiomics data integration have propelled this field, offering new insights into disease mechanisms, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic interventions.

Epigenesis, Genetic↗