Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REVIEW”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55Linked to original sources

A critical review of cancer epidemiology in the petroleum industry, with a meta-analysis of a combined database of more than 350,000 workers.

In 1989 we published a critical review of cancer epidemiology in petroleum workers, which included as a component of the review a meta-analysis by cancer site. Subsequently we have completed three additional reviews and meta-analyses on cell-type-specific leukemias (1995), multiple myeloma (1997), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (2000). The objective of the present investigation was to update our 1989 review and meta-analysis of nonlymphohematopoietic cancers in cohort studies of petroleum workers. Included in the present investigation were cohort studies of petroleum workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Finland, Sweden, and Italy. Individual studies were reviewed with regard to specific cancer sites. For each cancer of interest, risk ratios from the individual studies were presented. In some studies, subcohort analyses stratified by exposure parameters such as length of employment, job category, and hire year were also reported. These subcohort or stratified analyses were reviewed and the results of these analyses were taken into consideration in our interpretation. In addition to the qualitative review of individual studies, a meta-analysis was performed to combine data from individual cohort studies of petroleum workers. The primary purpose of the meta-analysis was to provide a summary measure of risk for each cancer site. Based on a review and meta-analyses of cohort studies of more than 350,000 petroleum workers in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Finland, Sweden, and Italy, we concluded that there was no increased mortality from digestive cancers (stomach, large intestine, liver, or pancreas), lung cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, or brain cancer. The summary standardized mortality ratios for these cancer sites were all below unity. Significant increases of melanoma mortality were reported in some small groups of refinery workers in the United Kingdom and upstream operation workers in Canada, but no responsible agent(s) had been identified. The observed mortality from skin cancer in all other studies was similar to the expected. In particular, no significant increase of skin cancer mortality was reported in any of the U.S. studies. Elevated mortality from prostate cancer was noted in short-term workers at a U.S. refinery and in short-term workers employed in certain crafts at U.S. crude oil operations. However, the absence of an upward trend by length of employment in these workers argued against an association between exposure to petroleum products and prostate cancer. For all petroleum workers as a whole, mortality from prostate cancer was as expected.

Australia↗

[Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group and the Cochrane Library. Useful resources for anaesthetists].

The Cochrane Collaboration is an international non-profit organisation that aims to help clinicians in making well-informed decisions about health care issues. This is done through preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews on the effects of health care interventions. To facilitate this task, review groups have been established. These groups cover specific health care areas and form the organisational basis of the collaboration. They provide methodological and logistic help to the authors of the systematic reviews. The Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group (CARG) covers anaesthesia, perioperative medicine, intensive care,pre-hospital medicine, resuscitation, and emergency medicine. Protocols and completed Cochrane reviews are published in a structured format in the electronic Cochrane Library. Beside this Cochrane database of systematic reviews, the Cochrane library contains a database with summaries of non-Cochrane systematic reviews (database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness), and a comprehensive database with controlled clinical trials (Cochrane central register of controlled trials). Thus the Cochrane library is a useful source of information on health care interventions for anaesthetists.

Anesthesiology↗

Botulinum toxin in the treatment of rare head and neck pain syndromes: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is used to treat various neurological disorders associated with pathologically increased muscle tone. Botulinum toxin inhibits the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction thereby inhibiting striatal muscle contractions. Besides the reduction in muscle tone BoNT tends to reduce pain in pain syndromes associated with muscle spasm. In addition, BoNT has been proposed as an analgesic, suggesting alternative non-cholinergic mechanisms of action.Surprisingly, BoNT was reported as a potential treatment for tension-type headache and migraine-both primary headache syndromes without an apparent muscular component-however, varying responses to BoNT have been found, overall without sufficient evidence for a general treatment. In this systematic review we set out to clarify the efficacy and safety of BoNT in the treatment of rare head and neck pain syndromes (e. g. cervicogenic headache, chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, cluster headache, trigeminal neuralgia, temporomandibular disorders, cervical dystonia and whiplash injuries). OBJECTIVES: To assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of botulinum toxins versus other medicines, placebo or no treatment in rare head and neck pain syndromes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the bibliographic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PASCAL Biomed to May 2003. We also reviewed the reference lists from identified articles including reviews and meta-analyses of treatment studies. Furthermore we searched booklets of scientific congresses in the field of neurology for potentially relevant studies. Additional reports were identified from the reference list of the retrieved papers, and by contacting experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with any dose of BoNT for rare head and neck pain syndromes, describing subjective pain assessment as either the primary or a secondary outcome, were included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All trials were quality scored and two independent reviewers extracted data. Results were compared for differences, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs of BoNT in cervical dystonia were included in this review. All except one showed significant pain relief following BoNT treatment compared to placebo. Studies providing dichotomous outcome data were pooled using the Peto method. The overall effect was found to be highly significant (OR 4.795 [95% CI 5.551-6.473]). For cervicogenic headache, two RCTs-one positive study and one negative study-were included. Two studies addressing chronic neck pain were included in this review. Both studies did not reveal significant effects. Furthermore, one small trial (N = 15 patients) focussing BoNT in temporomandibular disorders was included,without demonstrating significant effectiveness but a high proportion of patients lost to follow-up and a high rate of adverse effects. For the use of BoNT in cluster headache, chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and trigeminal neuralgia no RCTs were identified. Adverse effects (AEs) were found to be mild to moderate and dose-dependent. They were summarized where possible, irrespective of the formulation used and condition treated (OR = 5.066 [95% CI 2.770-9.265], number-needed-to-harm (NNH) = 5.5 [range 4.4-17]). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is convincing evidence for the effectiveness of BoNT in the treatment of pain associated with cervical dystonia. Due to the frequent adverse effects predominantly observed with higher doses, the trade off in risk and benefit should be carefully considered in each case. For all other rare head and neck pain syndromes we found no RCTs (cluster headache, chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, trigeminal neuralgia) and only a few small sized trials (cervicogenic headache, chronic neck pain, temporomandibular disorders). We were therefore unable to draw any definite conclusions.

Anti-Dyskinesia Agents↗

Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).

INTRODUCTION: More systematic reviews related to orthodontic topics are published each year, although little has been done to evaluate their search and selection methodologies. METHODS: Systematic reviews related to orthodontics published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2004, were searched for their use of multiple electronic databases and secondary searches. The search and selection methods of identified systematic reviews were evaluated against the Cochrane Handbook's guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen orthodontic systematic reviews were identified in this period. The percentage of reviews documenting and using each criterion of article searching has changed over the last 5 years, with no recognizable directional trend. On average, most systematic reviews documented their electronic search terms (88%) and inclusion-exclusion criteria (100%), and used secondary searching (75%). Many still failed to search more than MEDLINE (56%), failed to document the database names and search dates (37%), failed to document the search strategy (62%), did not use several reviewers for selecting studies (75%), and did not include all languages (81%). CONCLUSIONS: The methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics is still limited, with key methodological components frequently absent or not appropriately described.

Databases, Bibliographic↗

Encouragement to contribute to peer-review process in clinical neurology journals.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the chance of peer-review assignment as expected from the amount of publications in "Japanese" and "Arabic" investigators differed from that for "Other" investigators in mainstream clinical neurology journals in 2004. METHODS: Fifteen clinical neurology journals with the impact factor in 2004 greater than 2.5 and with the full list of reviewers available in public were analyzed. Thereby, "Japanese", "Arabic", and "Other" investigators were defined as those with Japanese-sounding last names, those with Arabic-sounding last names, and others. The ratio of number of reviewers to number of original articles was compared between "Japanese" and "Other" groups as well as "Arabic" and "Other" groups. In addition, we described how "Japanese" and "Arabic" investigators were assigned peer-review in Brain and Development in 2004. RESULTS: In the above-mentioned 15 clinical neurology journals, the mean ratio of number of reviewers to number of original articles was smaller in "Japanese" compared to "Other" investigators (paired t-test: df=14; t-value=6.85; p-value<0.001) but failed to demonstrate a difference in the mean ratio between "Arabic" and "Other" investigators (df=11; t-value=-0.36; p=0.7). In Brain and Development, the number of peer-reviewers relative to the amount of publications was larger in "Japanese" compared to "Other" group (Fisher's exact probability test: p-value<0.001). CONCLUSION: More "Japanese" investigators are encouraged to contribute to peer-review process in clinical neurology journals other than Brain and Development. More "Non-Japanese" investigators are encouraged to contribute to peer-review process in Brain and Development.

Biomedical Research↗

Evidence for physical therapies (airway clearance and physical training) in cystic fibrosis: an overview of five Cochrane systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: A range of physical therapies (including airway clearance and physical training) are used in cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of this paper is to summarise the main findings from Cochrane systematic reviews that have considered the evidence for physical therapies in CF. METHODS: All outcomes reported in relevant Cochrane systematic reviews are summarised. RESULTS: Review 1 provides some evidence from short-term trials of the benefit of airway clearance over no airway clearance in improved mucus transport but no definitive evidence from long-term trials to support the efficacy of airway clearance over no airway clearance; review 2 provides some evidence that conventional chest physiotherapy (CCPT) is at least as effective as other forms of airway clearance, but that patients may have a preference for self-administered treatments over CCPT; review 3 provides some evidence that positive expiratory pressure (PEP) is at least as effective as other forms of airway clearance; review 4 provides some evidence to support the use of non-invasive ventilation during airway clearance in patients with moderate to severe disease who have difficulty clearing sputum; review 5 provides some evidence of the benefits of different types of physical training. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane systematic reviews summarised in this paper provide some evidence to support the inclusion of physical therapies in the care-management plan of CF. They also provide information to steer the direction and focus of future research in this area.

Body Weight↗

External review for promotion and tenure in schools of nursing.

To obtain information about external review for tenure and/or promotion, the faculty affairs committee in a large nursing program located in the southeastern United States conducted a survey among programs that award a doctoral degree in nursing. Research questions focused on general tenure and promotion policies, policies and procedures regarding the use of external review, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of external review. A 22-item survey was sent to 53 institutions with a total of 34 usable surveys being returned. Findings revealed that a majority of the schools used external review, especially for tenure decisions and promotion to the associate and professor rank. Promotion and tenure criteria from individual schools were usually sent to reviewers along with the candidates' curriculum vitae and manuscripts. Candidates usually participated in the selection of external reviewers, but contact with reviewers was usually instituted by the administration within the institution. It was also felt that the advantage of external review far outweighed any disadvantages.

Career Mobility↗

Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: Published systematic reviews on prediction of preterm birth have tended to focus on a limited number of tests and their search strategies have often been relatively simple. Evaluation of all available tests in a systemic review will require a broad search strategy. AIM: To describe a case study of electronic searching for a systematic review of accuracy studies evaluating all tests for predicting preterm birth. METHODS: The search strategy, developed to capture literatures concerning all the tests en-masse consisted of formulation of an appropriate combination of search terms, pilot searches to refine the search term combination, selection of relevant databases, and citation retrieval from the refined searches for selection of potentially relevant papers. Electronic searches were carried out on general bibliographic databases (Biosis, Embase, Medline, Pascal and Scisearch), specialised databases (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Medion, National Research Register, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). RESULTS: A total of 30076 citations were identified. Of these 8855 (29%) citations were duplications either within a database or across databases. Of the remaining 21221 citations, 3333 were considered potentially relevant to the review after assessment by two reviewers. These citations covered 19 different tests for predicting preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: This case study suggests that with use of a concerted effort to organise and manage the electronic searching it is feasible to undertake broad searches for systematic reviews with multiple questions.

Databases, Bibliographic↗

Physician participation in quality management. Expanding the goals of peer review to detect both practitioner and system error.

BACKGROUND: The goals of peer review are to improve the quality of medical care and to provide fair review of individual practitioner actions, judged against the local standard of medical care. A new system for conducting peer review was evaluated which included in every case a root cause analysis to identify latent system flaws and a consideration of performance improvement projects to remedy these flaws. METHODS: The peer review committee of the medical service in a tertiary care, affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, which conducted the evaluation, was familiar with the local standards of care and the systems issues relevant to each case. Four questions were answered for each case: Was the quality of care less than ideal? If so, was the practitioner negligent? What system flaws contributed to the error or to the severity of injury? How could the system flaws be eliminated? RESULTS: Compared with the prior method of peer review, expanding the scope of review identified four times as many system problems (in 46% of cases versus 11%) without changing the incidence of finding provider negligence (21% preintervention versus 25% postintervention). Performance improvement projects were generated in 36 of 89 of these cases during the three-year period. DISCUSSION: Expanding the scope of peer review to include both root cause analysis and performance improvement thinking increased the detection of latent system flaws and the number of performance improvement projects without compromising the peer review committee's ability to identify negligence.

Hospitals, Veterans↗

Temporomandibular disorders: a review of current understanding.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to conduct a narrative review of current evidence regarding the understanding, evaluation, management, and treatment of temporomandibular disorders to provide a broad perspective and updated introduction to an important and controversial subject with rapidly changing developments and limited well-designed research. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified through a search of MEDLINE for 3 topics (temporomandibular disorder, temporomandibular joint, and chronic pain) over a 10-year period (January 1988 to August 1998) and of bibliographies of identified studies and review articles. STUDY SELECTION: More than 5000 articles were produced. In-depth review of all of this literature was beyond the scope of the present article, which is intended to provide an overview. The amount and diversity of the literature and the limitations of covering such a broad topic being recognized, the papers selected were those that reviewed limited topics or studied focused areas. This report is not a systematic (qualitative) or meta-analysis (quantitative) review. An acknowledged limitation of this narrative review method lies in the potential for bias in selection. The referenced works do not include all papers reviewed; only pertinent literature and reviews with comprehensive references were selectively included. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in basic and clinical science have resulted in important changes in the understanding and management of temporomandibular disorders. Many treatments are not supported by research, and the role of dentistry is changing to a more diagnostic and management-based model from the hands-on treatment procedures of the past. The present science-based understand-ing of a biopsychosocial disorder is important in properly and responsibly dealing with patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Humans↗

A systematic review on the clinical efficacy of subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature and to evaluate, in patients with chronic periodontitis, what the effect is of subgingival debridement (SGD), in terms of bleeding on probing, pocket depth and probing attachment level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group specialized register and MEDLINE were performed using specific search terms to identify studies assessing in patients with chronic periodontitis the effect of subgingival debridement with regard to clinical outcomes. This was performed on titles registered up to 2001. The only papers included were those which utilized data based on the patient as unit of observation. RESULTS: The searches identified 702 abstracts. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers (G.A.W. & M.F.T.) to identify publications that met specific inclusion criteria. The agreement between the two reviewers was assessed. The kappa score for agreement was 0.80. Review of these abstracts resulted in 114 publications for detailed review. Finally, 26 papers which met the criteria of eligibility were independently selected by the two reviewers. The kappa score for agreement on this decision was 0.92. Disagreement regarding inclusion of both abstracts and full papers was resolved by discussion between the reviewers. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) could be retrieved that were specifically designed to answer the question formulated at the outset of this systematic review. From the 10 controlled studies, four provide a definitive 'yes' that SGD is effective with regard to clinical outcomes. In the one study where subgingival debridement was not supported by oral hygiene instruction, the paper provided a definitive 'no'. The weighted mean of attachment gain of SGD in pockets initially >or=5 mm was 0.64 mm as compared with 0.37 mm for supragingival plaque control only (SPC). The reduction of pocket depth was 0.59 mm and 1.18 mm for SPC and SGD, respectively. Of the 18 papers that provided only information on the effect of treatment as compared with the baseline values, eight showed SGD to be beneficial with regard to clinical attachment level change while the remaining 10 provided no such an analysis. The weighted mean of this effect was a 0.74-mm gain of attachment as a result of treatment in pockets initially >or= 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic periodontitis, subgingival debridement (in conjunction with supragingival plaque control) is an effective treatment in reducing probing pocket depth and improving the clinical attachment level. In fact it is more effective than supragingival plaque control alone.

Adult↗

The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: a comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews.

In the face of an exponential increase in published biomedical studies, dermatologists frequently turn to review articles in order to keep abreast of important developments in the treatment of skin diseases. Traditional review articles have recently been criticized on the basis of their incompleteness and susceptibility to bias. Such biases can be minimized by employing a systematic approach to gathering, combining and interpreting the evidence of treatment efficacy. Using eight predetermined quality criteria, we compared the quality of 10 traditional review with one systematic review of treatments for postherpetic neuralgia, which were identified from the Medline database for 1992-96. None of the 10 traditional review articles satisfied all eight criteria: one satisfied five, two satisfied four and the rest satisfied two or fewer criteria. There was a wide variation in the recommendations of the authors for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia, often based on anecdotal evidence and clinical experience. On the other hand, the systematic review fulfilled seven of the eight quality criteria, failing only to discuss future directives. Furthermore, treatment recommendations were made solely on the basis of randomized controlled trials, which are considered to be the gold standard for measuring the benefits of any intervention. The variation in quality and treatment recommendations of traditional reviews is worrying. Systematic reviews should be encouraged in dermatology because they provide a summary of evidence of the effects of dermatological treatments, which has been derived using explicit methods widely accepted within science.

Herpes Zoster↗

The clinical impact of expert pathological review on lymphoma management: a regional experience.

The All Wales Lymphoma Panel (AWLP) was established in January 1998 to provide a central expert pathological review service for district general hospital pathologists. A discordance rate of 20% between the submitted and reviewed diagnosis has previously been identified. It has not been known whether this change in diagnosis affects clinical management. Ninety-nine patients whose diagnosis was changed as a result of central pathological review are presented. Between January 1998 and August 2000, 125 of 745 (17%) specimens submitted for AWLP review had a consequent change in pathological diagnosis. Of these 125 specimens, 99 (79%) complete case notes were recovered. In all 99 cases, a hypothetical management plan was generated using collected data, clinical protocols and the submitted pathological diagnosis. These plans were compared with the actual management patients received based on the reviewed diagnosis proffered by the AWLP. Forty-six of 99 (46%) cases had a change in management as a result of central pathological review. Overall, management was changed in 8% of cases referred for central pathological review. In conclusion, expert central pathological review has a direct effect on patient management.

Adult↗

Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests.

OBJECTIVES: To present the original descriptions of common orthopedic physical examination maneuvers of the knee and then to review the literature to support the scientific validity of these tests. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1970-2000) searches were performed, as were reviews of various musculoskeletal examination textbooks that describe physical examination maneuvers of the knee. These references were then reviewed for additional references and crossed back to the original description (when possible) of these named tests. STUDY SELECTION: All articles that discussed the sensitivity and specificity of the physical examination maneuvers were extracted. This information was reviewed for accuracy and then summarized. DATA EXTRACTION: Multiple MEDLINE and text searches were performed by using the terms of the test maneuver, the joint tested, and the term physical examination. Any article with this information was reviewed until the article describing the original description was found. Articles dating from that original article to the present were reviewed for information on the sensitivity and specificity of the test. DATA SYNTHESIS: Literature reviewing the sensitivity and specificity of the tests reviewed is summarized in text and table form. The Lachman test seems to be very sensitive and specific for the detection of anterior cruciate ligament tears. For posterior cruciate ligament tears, the posterior drawer test is also very sensitive and specific and is enhanced with other tests, such as the posterior sag sign. For meniscal tears, the McMurray test is very specific but has a very low sensitivity, whereas joint line tenderness has fairly good sensitivity but lacks good specificity. Although collateral ligament testing seems to be sensitive and specific, there is a lack of well-designed studies that scientifically validate the sensitivity and specificity of these tests. Common tests for patellofemoral pain and patellar instability lack sensitivity when correlated with pathologic operative findings. CONCLUSIONS: Most physical examination tests could be referenced back to an original description, with variable information on the sensitivity and specificity along with other information about the validity of these tests in clinical practice. To standardize how physical examinations are performed and compared, they should follow the original description or agreed-on standards. In addition, the significance of a physical examination finding must be understood to ensure that patients with knee complaints are accurately diagnosed and properly treated.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Results of provider self-adjudication using the prudent layperson standard compared with the managed care organization's emergency department claim review process.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We compare the results of a provider "self-adjudicating" outpatient emergency department claims using a "presenting symptom-based" system with the managed care organization (MCO) adjudicating the claims using a "final diagnosis-based" system. METHODS: All outpatient visits from one MCO to an urban, university hospital between January 1, 1998, and February 28, 1999, were included. Each record was reviewed by 2 methods to determine whether the visit qualified for payment under the MCO's benefit structure. Under the provider adjudication, symptom-based system, all visits with nursing triage levels of immediate/emergency were approved automatically. Those with triage levels of delayed/nonurgent were reviewed by an emergency physician and approved if, in the physician's opinion, the presenting symptoms met the emergency criteria under the District of Columbia's Access to Emergency Services Act. A second claims review, blinded to the first, was performed with the diagnosis-based system used by the MCO before approval of the prudent layperson standard. This review divided the records into "approve," "deny," and "suspend" categories according to the discharge International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision code. The results of the 2 reviews were compared. RESULTS: We reviewed 1,830 records; 836 (46%) cases were triaged as immediate/emergency and 994 (54%) as delayed/nonurgent. Of the 994 delayed/nonurgent visits, physician review determined that 607 (61%) met the prudent layperson standard and 387 (39%) did not. Overall, the provider self-adjudication system determined that 1,443 (78.8%) of the 1,830 visits should be approved for insurance coverage. The MCO's system approved 966 (53%), denied 335 (18%), and suspended 529 (29%). Provider self-adjudication using a symptom-based system resulted in the immediate approval of 1,443 (77.8%) visits compared with 966 (52.7%) by a diagnosis-based system (P <.001). Excluding the 529 suspended claims, McNemar's statistical testing of 1,302 records failed to demonstrate the equivalence of the 2 systems (P <. 001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard ED claims review process used by the managed care industry, provider self-adjudication using a symptom-based system approves a greater proportion of visits, avoids rejection of many ED visits, and identifies many nonemergency visits that mistakenly appear to be emergencies. The possibility of providers and MCOs working together to adjudicate outpatient ED claims should be explored.

Ambulatory Care↗

Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence: what are the experiences of women with endometriosis?

Just as systematic reviews of quantitative research have developed over the last two decades, the use of a systematic review is also superseding narrative non-systematic reviews in qualitative research in an attempt to bring rigour to reviewing research evidence. Qualitative research is concerned with the subjective world and the way in which people interpret and make sense of the reality of their lives. This paper describes procedures for conducting a systematic review on qualitative research, and the methods for assessing the quality of qualitative research papers, using published qualitative research on endometriosis as an example to demonstrate these. The conclusion from the systematic review carried out is that the values and methods utilised for a systematic review can usefully be applied to qualitative research. The review of endometriosis research revealed that despite the impact of endometriosis on the lives of women sufferers, little qualitative research has been conducted, and much of that which exists lacks rigour in a number of key areas.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Smoking cessation interventions for in-patients: a selective review with recommendations for hospital-based health professionals.

A selective review of the literature was conducted to provide evidence-based recommendations for the clinical management of hospitalized smokers. The Cochrane library, in particular the Cochrane review of 'Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients', was the basis for the review and was supplemented with other clinical and non-clinical literature where the review did not inform clinicians sufficiently. Evidence was reviewed on issues considered by the authors to be of importance to health professionals interested in providing a smoking cessation intervention to their patients. The review suggests that effective hospital interventions: incorporate an in-patient intervention lasting greater than 20 minutes in duration with extended post discharge follow-up; consist of at least five intervention contacts; and be delivered over at least a 3-month period. Furthermore, interventions should include in-patient advice and counselling, the provision of nicotine replacement therapy and extended proactive post discharge telephone support. The review also indicates that cessation interventions are particularly effective when delivered to patients with a cardiovascular diagnosis. All health professionals may be effective in providing cessation treatments; however, the addition of a specialist smoking cessation counsellor appears to improve interventions in this setting. Finally, without the development of supportive systems, routine intervention with smoking patients by health professionals is unlikely. Recommendations for the delivery of effective smoking cessation interventions in hospitals are provided. [Wolfenden L, Campbell E, Walsh RA, Wiggers J. Smoking cessation interventions for in-patients: a selective review with recommendations for hospital-based health professionals.

Feedback↗

Traumatic brain injury and substance misuse: a systematic review of prevalence and outcomes research (1994-2004).

A systematic review of the evidence on substance misuse prevalence in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and outcomes associated with this population is presented. Building upon an earlier review of the area by Corigan (1995), this review is limited to research published between 1994 and 2004. Psycinfo and Medline abstract databases were searched for English-language publications citing research from Western countries on the epidemiology and outcomes of adult TBI patients (aged 15 years or older). The majority of reviewed studies were undertaken in the USA and the investigation foci and methods used were multifarious, constraining the generalisation of the review findings. Prevalence for alcohol intoxication at time of injury in the review was found to be almost identical to that in Corrigan's review: 37-51% and 36-51%, respectively. Pre-TBI history of alcohol misuse was found to be less prevalent in the present as opposed to Corrigan's review: 37-51% and 55-66%, respectively. Outcome findings were mixed (also found by Corrigan), but mainly in the expected direction of poorer outcomes (neurological, medical, neuropsychological, and functional) in patients with pre-TBI substance misuse. Further research and implications for services are outlined.

Brain Injuries↗