Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55Linked to original sources

Laparoscopic navigation pointer for three-dimensional image-guided surgery.

BACKGROUND: The main drawback with the laparoscopic approach is that the surgeon is unable to palpate vessels, tumors, and organs during surgery. Furthermore, the laparoscope provides only surface view of organs. There is a need for more advanced visualizations that can enhance the view to include information below the surface of the organs for planning of the procedure and for control and guidance during treatment. METHODS: We propose three-dimensional (3D) navigation technology based on preoperatively acquired magnetic resonance or computed tomography data used in combination with a laparoscopic navigation pointer (LNP). The LNP has an attached position tracker that allows the surgeon to control the display of images interactively before and during surgery. This study evaluated the patient registration accuracy, the feasibility of image-based navigation and, qualitatively, the navigation precision in the retroperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: This technology was used during the treatment of six patients (involving adrenalectomies and a neuroma protruding into the pelvis). An average patient registration accuracy of 6.90 mm was achieved. The precision during navigation in the retroperitoneum was, in some cases, better than the patient registration accuracy suggested. The technology helped the surgeons to understand better the anatomy and to locate blood vessels. CONCLUSIONS: In the reported cases, the LNP was a useful tool for image guidance in laparoscopic surgery, both for planning the surgical approach in detail and for guidance. The authors believe that adominal 3D image guidance using an LNP has a large potential for improving laparoscopic surgery, especially when vessels and anatomic relations may be difficult to identify using only a laparoscope. Accordingly, they believe this new technology could increase safety and make it easier for the surgeon to perform successful laparoscopic surgery.

Adenoma↗

Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has been used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to conventional open surgery. Recently, laparoscopic therapy for pancreatic diseases has made significant strides. The current investigation studied pancreatic resection by laparoscopy. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic major resection for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. METHODS: A prospective study of laparoscopic pancreatic resections was undertaken in patients with benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. Over an 8-year period, 32 patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatic major resection: 21 left pancreatectomies (1 performed using a retroperitoneal approach), and 11 pancreatoduodenectomies (10 Whipple procedures and 1 total pancreatectomy). All the operations were performed in a single institution. RESULTS: The operations were performed without serious complications. Only one left pancreatectomy was converted to laparotomy because of massive splenic bleeding, and one Whipple procedure was converted because of adhesion to the portal vein. In four of the Whipple operations, the resection was performed completely laparoscopically, and the reconstruction was done via a small midline incision. There was no operative mortality. In 16 patients of the left pancreatectomy group, the spleen was preserved. The mean blood loss was 150 and 162 ml; and the mean operating time was 154 and 284 min, respectively, for the left pancreatectomy and the Whipple procedure. Postoperative complications occurred for five patients after left pancreatectomy and for three patients after the Whipple procedure. Two patients needed surgical reexploration after left pancreatectomy because of intraperitoneal haemorrhage and eventration of the extraction site. Two patients underwent reoperation after the Whipple procedure: one because of intraabdominal bleeding and the other because of small bowel obstruction. The mean hospital stay was 10.8 days after left the pancreatectomy and 13.6 days after the whipple procedure. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions is feasible, safe, and beneficial. We believe that pancreatoduodenectomy should be performed only in selected cases and by a highly skilled laparoscopic surgeon. If there is any doubt, an open resection should be performed.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as an alternative to open surgery for the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation. This study compared the outcome of laparoscopic and open approaches for the repair of gastroduodenal perforations. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted with 134 consecutive patients treated for gastroduodenal perforations. These patients included 122 with perforated duodenal ulcers, 10 with perforated gastric ulcers, and 2 with iatrogenic duodenal perforations. Whereas 68 patients were treated laparoscopically, 66 patients underwent conventional (open) surgery. RESULTS: Laparoscopic repair was successful in 65 cases (96 %). The mean operating time was shorter with the laparoscopic technique (68 vs 59 min), but the difference was not significant. The duration of postoperative nasogastric aspiration and time to resumed oral intake were shorter in the laparoscopic group (2.6 vs 4.1 days and 4.4 vs. 5.2 days, respectively; p = 0.043). The postoperative analgetic requirements, and overall complications rate were significantly lower after laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay (5.1 vs 6.1 days) or mortality rate between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of gastroduodenal perforations is a safe alternative treatment offering certain significant short-term advantages.

Adolescent↗

Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed all develop a mathematical model for predicting the conversion rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHOD: This descriptive single-center study used routinely collected clinical data from 1,253 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. A two-level hierarchical regression model was used to identify patient, surgeon, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. The model was internally validated and tested using measures of discrimination and calibration. Exclusion criteria for laparoscopic colectomy included a body mass greater than 50, lesion diameter exceeding 15 cm, and multiple prior major laparotomies (exclusive of appendectomy, hysterectomy, and cholecystectomy). RESULTS: The average conversion rate for the study population was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-11.7%). The independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 2.1 per 10 Americans Society of Anesthesiology units increase), (ASA) grade 3 or 4, 1 or 2 (OR, 3.2, 5.8), type of resection (low rectal, left colorectal, right colonic vs small/other bowel procedures; OR, 8.82, 4.76, 2.98), presence of intraoperative abscess (OR, 3.60) or fistula (OR, 4.73), and surgeon seniority (junior vs senior staff OR, 1.56). The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.74) and excellent agreement (p = 0.384) between observed and model-predicted conversion rates (range of calibration, 3-32% conversion rate). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic conversion rates are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment for case mix before comparisons are made between or within centers. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) laparoscopic conversion rate model is a simple additive score that can be used in everyday practice to evaluate outcomes for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Adolescent↗

Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance?

BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy has been introduced as an alternative to the standard laparoscopic technique, but it has not yet been established whether it offers the same benefits. Therefore, we compared the outcome of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection (HALSR) to that of those undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR). METHODS: The study population comprised a sequential series of consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoid/left colectomy. Values are reported as mean (range). RESULTS: There were 85 LSR patients and 66 HALSR patients, with no differences in patient demographics or diagnoses. There were slight differences in operative time favoring HALSR (LSR 205 min (90-380) vs HALSR 189 min (120-290); p = 0.07), and the extraction incision was larger in the HALSR group (LSR 6.2 cm (3-25) vs HALSR 8.1 cm (7-12); p < 0.01). There was no difference in time for return of bowel function (LSR 2.8 days (1-15) vs HALSR 2.5 days (1-8); p = 0.31) or length of hospital stay (LSR 5.0 days (2-17) vs HALSR 5.2 days (3-22); p = 0.73). Complications were similar in the two groups (LSR 23% vs HALSR 21%), but there were fewer conversions in the hand-assisted group (HALSR 0% vs LSR 13%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection yields the same outcomes as standard laparoscopic techniques, but with fewer conversions. Hand-assistance is a helpful innovation that may expand the application of laparoscopic colectomy.

Adult↗

The impact of laparoscopic bariatric workshops on the practice patterns of surgeons.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the impact of a 2-day laparoscopic bariatric workshop on the practice patterns of participating surgeons. METHODS: From October 1998 to June 2002, 18 laparoscopic bariatric workshops were attended by 300 surgeons. Questionnaires were mailed to all participants. RESULTS: Responses were received from 124 surgeons (41%), among whom were 56 bariatric surgeons (open) (45%), 30 advanced laparoscopic surgeons (24%), and 38 surgeons who performed neither bariatric nor advanced laparoscopic surgery (31%). The questionnaire responses showed that 46 surgeons (37%) currently are performing laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB), 38 (31%) are performing open gastric bypass, and 39 (32%) are not performing bariatric surgery. Since completion of the course, 46 surgeons have performed 8,893 LGBs (mean, 193 cases/surgeon). Overall, 87 of the surgeons (70%) thought that a limited preceptorship was necessary before performance of LGB, yet only 25% underwent this additional training. According to a poll, the respondents thought that, on the average, 50 cases (range, 10-150 cases) are needed for a claim of proficiency. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic bariatric workshops are effective educational tools for surgeons wishing to adopt bariatric surgery. Open bariatric surgeons have the highest rates of adopting laparoscopic techniques and tend to participate in more adjunctive training before performing LGB. There was consensus that the learning curve is steep, and that additional training often is necessary. The authors propose a mechanism for post-residency skill acquisition for advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Bariatric Surgery↗

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatic cavernous hemangioma. A preliminary experience with 27 patients.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), currently used extensively for liver tumors, also has been applied successfully to hepatic cavernous hemangioma (HCH) percutaneously. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic RFA for patients with HCHs. METHODS: Between March 2001 and March 2004, 27 patients with symptomatic and rapid-growth lesions were treated by laparoscopic RFA using the RF-2000 generator system. The treatment-related complications were observed. All the patients were followed up with helical computed tomography scans and ultrasonography at regular intervals to assess the therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic RFA. RESULTS: This study assessed 9 men and 18 women with a mean age of 41.6 +/- 8.3 years. Three additional intrahepatic lesions missed preoperatively were found in three patients on intraoperative ultrasound. A total of 27 patients with 50 liver lesions were treated successfully with laparoscopic RFA. The mean maximum tumor diameter was 5.5 +/- 2.0 cm. The mean length of time for RFA per lesion was 20.7 +/- 11.9 min, and the mean blood loss was 134.4 +/- 88.9 ml. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed simultaneously for gallstones in 13 patients and for abutting of gallbladder from hemangioma in 2 patients. In addition, 3 patients also had a laparoscopic deroofing of simple hepatic cysts. Although postoperative low-grade fever and transient elevation of serum transaminase levels were observed in 13 patients, there were no complications related to laparoscopic RFA. During a median follow-up period of 21 months (range, 12-42 months), complete lesion necrosis was achieved for all the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RFA therapy is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic and rapid-growth HCHs located on the surface of the liver or adjacent to the gallbladder. Intraoperative ultrasonography is a useful adjunct for detecting additional liver lesions and offering more accurate targeting for RFA.

Adult↗

Comparison of laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a metaanalysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery for patients with ileocecal Crohn's disease is a contentious issue. This metaanalysis aimed to compare open resection with laparoscopically assisted resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease. METHODS: A literature search of the Medline, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection. Metaanalytical techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to evaluate the heterogeneity of the study. RESULTS: Of 20 studies identified by literature review, 15 satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the study. These included outcomes for 783 patients, 338 (43.2%) of whom had undergone laparoscopic resection, with an overall conversion rate to open surgery of 6.8%. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group, by 29.6 min (p = 0.002), although the blood loss and complications in the two groups were similar. In terms of postoperative recovery, the laparoscopic patients had a significantly shorter time for recovery of their enteric function and a shorter hospital stay, by 2.7 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For selected patients with noncomplicated ileocecal Crohn's disease, laparoscopic resection offered substantial advantages in terms of more rapid resolution of postoperative ileus and shortened hospital stay. There was no increase in complications, as compared with open surgery. The contraindications to laparoscopic approaches for Crohn's disease remain undefined.

Crohn Disease↗

Measuring laparoscopic operative skill in a video trainer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery requires a unique set of technical skills. More experienced laparoscopic surgeons perform certain tasks more efficiently in a video trainer than less experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The presumption is that the experienced surgeon possesses more of the skill required to complete the task. This study sought to determine the degree to which previous laparoscopic operative experience influenced the performance of selected video trainer tasks of varying complexity. METHODS: In this study, 19 general surgery residents with varying levels of laparoscopic operative case experience (as defined by operative case logs) were timed performing five tasks in a video trainer. The tasks were rope pass, peg drop, peg exchange, needle pass, and knot tie. All the residents watched a video demonstration of each skill before testing. None of the residents had previous exposure to video trainers, and no practice was allowed before testing. A composite score for all tasks was calculated for each resident as a measure of overall performance. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between operative experience and time required for successful completion of each task, with the exception of the rope pass. The magnitude of correlation increased with tasks of increasing complexity. Composite scores were correlated with operative experience. Significant interval improvements in performance were observed for increasing experience up to a level of approximately 100 previous laparoscopic cases. CONCLUSIONS: Overall composite scores and time required for the completion of each individual video trainer task (with the exception of the rope pass) may be an accurate reflection of laparoscopic surgical skill acquired in the operating room. A resident may need as many as 100 laparoscopic cases for full development of a basic skill set in the operating room. A more efficient and safe method of training, such as a validated skills curriculum conducted in a dry lab, is a desirable alternative to developing skill exclusively in the operating room.

Clinical Competence↗

Influence of colorectal laparoscopic surgery on dissemination and seeding of tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the influence of colorectal laparoscopic surgery and conventional surgery on dissemination and seeding of tumor cells. METHODS: Intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology was performed for 36 patients with colorectal cancer during colorectal laparoscopic surgery and for 45 patients with colorectal cancer during conventional surgery. Cytology was examined twice: immediately after opening of the peritoneal cavity and just before closure of the abdomen. Saline was poured into the peritoneal cavity, and 100 ml fluid was retrieved after irrigation. Laparoscopic instruments were lavaged after surgery with 100 ml of saline. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) was derived through the trocar side orifice after pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic coloectomy and filtered through 100 ml of saline. Cytologic examination of the filtrate was performed after the filtration process, smear, cell block, and staining. RESULTS: Malignant cells were not detected in the CO(2) filtrate gas. The incidence of positive cytology in the lavage of the instruments during laparoscopic surgery was 2.78%. The incidence of positive cytology during laparoscopic surgery was 33.33% in the prelavage and 8.33% in the postlavage. The incidence of positive cytology during conventional surgery was 33.33% in the prelavage and 11.11% in the postlavage. CONCLUSION: During colorectal laparoscopic surgery, CO(2) pneumoperitoneum does not affect tumor cell dissemination and seeding. In this study, laparoscopic techniques used in colorectal cancer surgery were not associated with a greater risk for intraperitoneal dissemination of cancer cells than the conventional technique.

Ascitic Fluid↗

Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease of the distal ileum with open surgery in two consecutive groups of patients. METHODS: From 1995 until 1998, 48 patients underwent open ileocolic resection at the Academic Medical Center (AMC) in Amsterdam, while 30 patients had laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). Patient characteristics, perioperative course, and recovery were compared. Differences between the groups were tested using Student's t-test for independent groups and chi-square tests when appropriate. RESULTS: The open and the laparoscopic patient groups were comparable for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), prior abdominal surgery, and length of resected bowel. The conversion rate was 6.6%. Laparoscopic operating times (138+/-SD 36 min) were significantly longer than those observed in the open group (104+/-SD 34 min). Discharge was significantly earlier in the laparoscopic group than the open group (5.7 vs 10.2 postoperative days, p<0.007). Postoperative morbidity did not differ significantly between the patients treated traditionally (14.6%) and laparoscopically (10%). CONCLUSION: Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease is associated with similar morbidity rates, a shorter hospital stay, and improved cosmetic results, justifying the laparoscopic approach as the procedure of choice.

Adult↗

Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study, we compared a laparoscopic radical vaginal approach with abdominal radical hysterectomy type II for treatment of patients with cervical cancer at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I to III. METHODS: Between January 1991 and March 1994, 70 patients with cervical cancer were treated by radical abdominal hysterectomy, and between August 1994 and May 1999, 70 patients with cervical cancer were treated by laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Data from both the abdominal group and the laparoscopic-vaginal group were obtained retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer for the laparoscopic-vaginal approach than for the abdominal approach (292.9 vs 209.9 min). Significantly more pelvic lymph nodes were removed by laparoscopy (27 vs 10.7). Blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower in the laparoscopic-vaginal group. Intraoperative complications were seen more often during laparoscopic-vaginal surgery (p < 0.05). Early postoperative complications occurred significantly more frequently after the abdominal approach. The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients treated by laparoscopic-vaginal surgery (11.4 vs 22.8 days). CONCLUSION: Compared with laparotomy, the laparoscopic-vaginal approach for treatment of cervical cancer is associated with lower rates of transfusion and early postoperative morbidity.

Adult↗

Role of laparoscopic ultrasonography in intraoperative localization of pancreatic insulinoma.

BACKGROUND: A combination of digital palpation and ultrasonography plays an important role in locating insulinomas intraoperatively. Laparoscopic resection of insulinomas has been described recently, but experience in locating insulinomas during laparoscopy is lacking. METHODS: From January 1998 to January 1999, three patients with pancreatic insulinomas underwent laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography aimed at intraoperative localization and potential resection. The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography in locating insulinomas is evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperative localization studies were routinely performed, and two patients had an occult tumor before laparoscopy. None of the tumors was detected by laparoscopic examination, but laparoscopic ultrasonography identified solitary tumors located at the body and tail of the pancreas. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in one patient as a planned procedure. One patient underwent laparoscopic enucleation, whereas the other had a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ultrasonography seems to be sensitive in locating insulinomas at the body and tail of the pancreas. It optimizes and facilitates resection of insulinomas through a minimally invasive approach.

Adult↗

Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections.

BACKGROUND: Surgical trauma and anesthesia are known to cause transient postoperative suppression of the immune system. In randomized controlled trials, it has been shown that laparoscopic colorectal resections have short-term benefits not observed with conventional colorectal resections. We hypothesized that these benefits were due to the reduction in surgical trauma, leading to a diminished cytokine response and less depression of cell-mediated immunity after laparoscopy. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, colorectal cancer patients without evidence of metastatic disease underwent either laparoscopic (n = 20) or conventional (n = 20) tumor resection. Postoperative immune function was assessed by measuring the white blood cell (WBC) count, the CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, the CD4+/CD8+/ratio, and the HLA-DR expression of CD14+ monocytes. In addition, the production of interleukin-6 (IL = 6) and TNF-a were measured after ex vivo stimulation of mononuclear blood cells with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and compared to the plasma levels of these cytokines. Postoperative mean levels of the immunologic parameters for the two groups were calculated and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Preoperatively, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics or immunologic parameters. Although the postoperative peak concentrations of white blood cells were significant lower in the laparoscopic group than the conventional group (p < 0.05), there were no differences between the two groups in the subpopulation of lymphocytes (CD4+, CD8+). HLA-DR expression of CD14+ monocytes was lower in the conventional group on the 4th postoperative day (p < 0.05). The laparoscopic group showed higher values in cytokine production of mononuclear blood cells after LPS stimulation. Postoperative plasma peak concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-a were lower after laparoscopic resection. CONCLUSION: Postoperative cell-mediated immunity was better preserved after laparoscopic than after conventional colorectal resection. Cellular cytokine production was preserved only in the laparoscopic group, while cytokine plasma levels were significantly higher in the conventional group. These findings may have important implications for the use of laparoscopic colorectal resection, especially in patients with malignant disease.

Aged↗

Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1.

BACKGROUND: A laparoscopic approach to the spine for the performance of a minimally invasive discectomy was first described in 1991. Since that time, a number of approaches to laparoscopic discectomy have appeared in the literature. Although these reports demonstrate the ability to approach the spine through a laparoscopic technique, they do not address the issues of loss of disc space, lumbar instability, and the need for interbody fusion. METHODS: Described is a technique of laparoscopic discectomy with interbody fusion that has been performed successfully in 75 patients. Although a carbon fiber implant was utilized to aid in the fusion process, the technique can equally be performed using donor bone as the interbody support. In the 75 patients attempted, 73 procedures were successfully completed via the laparoscopic approach. One patient was converted to an open anterior approach due to extensive pelvic adhesions from prior surgery. A second patients procedure was aborted after the diagnostic laparoscopy demonstrated dense presacral scarring from a previous gynecological procedure. RESULTS: There were no major complications in the series. Two patients with high riding bladders sustained bladder lacerations that were recognized and repaired with simple suture closure. There were no bowel injuries, and more importantly, no major vessel injury. The patients were discharged from the hospital on an average within 36 hours, with a return to work averaging between 2-4 weeks depending on the patients type of work. Using a modified pain score for evaluation, post operative pain was reduced by 75%. CONCLUSIONS: From this study, it is concluded that laparoscopic discectomy with interbody fusion is not only feasible, but appears to give good results with follow up extending out beyond two years. Issues regarding the use of carbon fiber cages vs. bone and indications of the procedure are independent of the laparoscopic approach and are addressed extensively in the orthopedic literature. It can be concluded that when there is surgical indication for L5-S1 discectomy, that a laparoscopic approach with interbody fusion may become the procedure of choice.

Diskectomy↗

A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of surgeons' physical fatigue in the new ergonomic environment of laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine what the differences are in the movement of the surgeon's axial skeleton between laparoscopic and open operations. METHODS: Surgeons' body positions were recorded on videotape during four laparoscopic (LAP) and six open (OP) operations. The percent of time the head and back were in a normal, bent, or twisted position as well as the number of changes in head and back position were tabulated using a computer program. A separate laboratory study was performed on four surgeons "walking" a 0.5-inch polyethylene tubing forward and backward using laparoscopic and open techniques. The movements of the surgeons' head, trunk, and pelvis were measured using a three-camera kinematic system (Kin). The center of pressure was recorded using a floor-mounted forceplate (Fp). RESULTS: In the operating room surgeons' head and back positions were more often straight in laparoscopic procedures and more often bent in open operations. The number of changes in back position per minute were significantly decreased when the laparoscopic-only part of surgery was analyzed. In the laboratory the subjects' head position was significantly (p = 0.02) more upright and the anteroposterior (AP) and rotational range of motion of the head was significantly reduced during laparoscopy. Subjects' CP was more anterior and there was a significant reduction in the AP range of motion of the CP during laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that surgeons exhibit decreased mobility of the head and back and less anteroposterior weight shifting during laparoscopic manipulations despite a more upright posture. This more restricted posture during laparoscopic surgery may induce fatigue by limiting the natural changes in body posture that occur during open surgery.

Ergonomics↗

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Resection of diverticular disease may be quite challenging; the acute inflammatory process, thick sigmoid mesentery, and any associated fistula or abscess can make this procedure technically demanding. The aim of this study was to compare the results between laparoscopic and laparotomy-type resections stratified by disease severity and thereby predict outcome and possibly a subset of patients who may benefit from a laparoscopic approach. METHODS: From August 1991 to December 1995, all patients with diverticular disease were classified according to a modified Hinchey classification system. The laparoscopic group included 18 patients who underwent a laparoscopic assisted colectomy, one with a loop ileostomy. The identical procedures were performed in 18 patients by laparotomy. The mean age of the two groups were 62.8 and 67.1 years, respectively (p = NS). RESULTS: Seven of 18 patients in whom laparoscopy was attempted (38.9%) had conversion to laparotomy. Six of seven (85.7%) conversions were directly related to the intense inflammatory process. Laparoscopic treated patients with Hinchey IIa or IIb disease had a morbidity rate of 33.3% and a conversion rate of 50% while all patients with Hinchey I disease were successfully completed without morbidity or conversions to laparotomy. However, after the first four cases, the intraoperative morbidity and postoperative morbidity rates were zero and 14.3% and after ten cases they were zero and zero, respectively. Furthermore, the median length of hospitalization for Hinchey I patients after laparoscopy was 5.0 days vs 7 days after laparotomy (p < 0.05). In Hinchey IIa and IIb patients, the median length of hospitalization was almost 50% shorter with a laparoscopic approach (6 days vs 10 days, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, laparoscopic resection of diverticulitis can be performed without additional morbidity particularly in Hinchey I patients and with a reduced length of hospitalization in patients with class I or II disease. Patients with class I disease, and after initial experience even those with class II disease, can benefit from the reduced morbidity and length of hospitalization associated with laparoscopic treatment.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic repair of recurrent hernias.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after primary conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy occurs in approximately 10% of patients depending on the type of repair and expertise of the surgeon. The repair of the resulting recurrent hernia is a daunting task because of already weakened tissues and obscured and distorted anatomy. The failure rate of these repairs using an open anterior approach may reach as high as 36%. Because of such a high failure rate, a number of investigators have focused on repairing these difficult recurrent hernias laparoscopically using a tension-free approach. Some of the earlier reports suggested a low recurrence rate of 0.5% to 5% when a laparoscopic approach was used to repair these hernias. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic treatment for recurrent hernias in our institutions. METHODS: Between February 1991 and February 1995, 96 recurrent hernias were repaired in 85 patients (78 men and 7 women). There were 48 right, 26 left, and 11 bilateral hernias. The mean age of the patients was 59 years (range, 18-86 years); the mean height was 69 in. (range, 54-77 in.); and the mean weight was 176 pounds (range, 109-280 pounds). A total of 68 herniorrhaphies were performed using the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) method: 19 using intraperitoneal on-lay mesh (IPOM) repair and 8 using the total extraperitoneal (TEP) method. The method of repair in one patient was not recorded. The mean operating time was 76 min (range, 47-172 min). Thirteen patients underwent additional procedures. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up was performed by questionnaire, examination, or both in 76 patients (85 hernias). Median follow-up time was 27 months (range, 2-56 months). There were four recurrences (2 in IPOM and 2 in TAPP). Three of these were repaired laparoscopically and one conventionally. There were 20 minor and 14 major complications and no mortality. One conversion occurred in the TAPP group. Mean postoperative stay was 1.4 days (range, 0-4 days). It was felt by 92% of the patients that their symptoms were completely relieved, whereas 4% of the patients continued to exhibit symptoms for which their hernia was repaired, and 3.6% failed to answer. As reported, 86% of the patients preferred their laparoscopic repair; 1% preferred the conventional repair; and 13% failed to reply. Afterward, 77% of the patients returned to normal activity, and 35% returned to vigorous activity within 4 weeks of surgery. Satisfaction with laparoscopic repair was expressed by 92% of the patients, whereas 8% either were dissatisfied or did not answer. In the end, 95% of the patients stated that they would recommend laparoscopic hernia surgery to their family and friends. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data show that laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia is a safe alternative procedure with acceptable rates of recurrence and complications.

Adult↗