SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In 1995, the European Respiratory Society published a European Consensus Statement on the optimal assessment and management of COPD. In the document, several important areas for future research are identified that may help to increase knowledge of the current situation of COPD within Europe; these include pathophysiology, epidemiology, and the clinical benefits of treatment. This article reviews a selection of important data that have become available since the consensus statement was published, with a specific focus on epidemiology and treatment.
Screening for early-stage asymptomatic cancers (eg, cancers of breast and colon) to prevent late-stage malignancies has been widely accepted. However, although atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (eg, heart attack and stroke) accounts for more death and disability than all cancers combined, there are no national screening guidelines for asymptomatic (subclinical) atherosclerosis, and there is no government- or healthcare-sponsored reimbursement for atherosclerosis screening. Part I and Part II of this consensus statement elaborated on new discoveries in the field of atherosclerosis that led to the concept of the "vulnerable patient." These landmark discoveries, along with new diagnostic and therapeutic options, have set the stage for the next step: translation of this knowledge into a new practice of preventive cardiology. The identification and treatment of the vulnerable patient are the focuses of this consensus statement. In this report, the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force presents a new practice guideline for cardiovascular screening in the asymptomatic at-risk population. In summary, the SHAPE Guideline calls for noninvasive screening of all asymptomatic men 45-75 years of age and asymptomatic women 55-75 years of age (except those defined as very low risk) to detect and treat those with subclinical atherosclerosis. A variety of screening tests are available, and the cost-effectiveness of their use in a comprehensive strategy must be validated. Some of these screening tests, such as measurement of coronary artery calcification by computed tomography scanning and carotid artery intima-media thickness and plaque by ultrasonography, have been available longer than others and are capable of providing direct evidence for the presence and extent of atherosclerosis. Both of these imaging methods provide prognostic information of proven value regarding the future risk of heart attack and stroke. Careful and responsible implementation of these tests as part of a comprehensive risk assessment and reduction approach is warranted and outlined by this report. Other tests for the detection of atherosclerosis and abnormal arterial structure and function, such as magnetic resonance imaging of the great arteries, studies of small and large artery stiffness, and assessment of systemic endothelial dysfunction, are emerging and must be further validated. The screening results (severity of subclinical arterial disease) combined with risk factor assessment are used for risk stratification to identify the vulnerable patient and initiate appropriate therapy. The higher the risk, the more vulnerable an individual is to a near-term adverse event. Because <10% of the population who test positive for atherosclerosis will experience a near-term event, additional risk stratification based on reliable markers of disease activity is needed and is expected to further focus the search for the vulnerable patient in the future. All individuals with asymptomatic atherosclerosis should be counseled and treated to prevent progression to overt clinical disease. The aggressiveness of the treatment should be proportional to the level of risk. Individuals with no evidence of subclinical disease may be reassured of the low risk of a future near-term event, yet encouraged to adhere to a healthy lifestyle and maintain appropriate risk factor levels. Early heart attack care education is urged for all individuals with a positive test for atherosclerosis. The SHAPE Task Force reinforces existing guidelines for the screening and treatment of risk factors in younger populations. Cardiovascular healthcare professionals and policymakers are urged to adopt the SHAPE proposal and its attendant cost-effectiveness as a new strategy to contain the epidemic of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and the rising cost of therapies associated with this epidemic.
The purpose of this study was to develop a strategy to reduce transfusion-related HIV transmission which went beyond the limits of routine HIV screening of blood donors. Current blood transfusion practices were assessed in 1044 patients for whom staff physicians had requested a transfusion between 5 September and 19 October, 1988. Children under 5 years of age with malaria, and pregnant women with acute anaemia requiring blood transfusion were the two highest risk groups. Many of the transfusions were given without an obvious medical indication; 22.7% (214 out of 955) of the recipients were transfused without prior laboratory tests [haemoglobin (Hb) or haematocrit (Hct)], 7.2% with Hb greater than 6g/100ml or Hct greater than 25% and 16.6% without clinical signs of severe anaemia (pulse less than 100/min without shortness of breath). The data of this study were used to organize a workshop for all the physicians responsible for blood transfusions in Kinshasa and two nearby health zones. A consensus statement on the indications for blood transfusion was developed. Subsequently, transfusion centres adopted this consensus statement instead of previous guidelines.
BACKGROUND: An "Interdisciplinary Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Therapy of Testicular Tumors" was prepared in 1996 by the "Interdisciplinary Testicular Tumor Working Group" (IAH) with input from representatives from diagnostic and therapeutic disciplines of various working groups of the German Cancer Society (Strahlenther Onkol 1997;173:397-406). In 1998 the IAH met again together with the "Testicular Tumor Working Party" of the Urooncology Working Group (AUO) and formed the "German Testicular Cancer Study Group" (GTCSG). Defined and accepted interdisciplinary standards from the initial meeting were revised based on current scientific developments and clinical results. This cooperating effort increased the quality of the initial recommendations and helped to put the recommendations for diagnosing and treating testicular tumor on a broader scientific basis. METHODS: According to the principles of "evidence-based medicine" (EBM), the Consensus from 1996 was modified, based on the current level of evidence from the published literature. The methodological process and evaluation criteria used were that of the "Cochrane Collaboration". RESULTS: An "Interdisciplinary Update Consensus Statement" summarizes and defines the diagnostic and therapeutic standards according to the current scientific practices in testicular cancer. For 21 separate areas scientifically based decision criteria are suggested. For treatment areas where more than one option exist without a consensus being reached for a preferred strategy, such as in seminoma in clinical Stage I or in non-seminoma Stages CS I or CS IIA/B, all acceptable alternative strategies with their respective advantages and disadvantages are presented. This "Interdisciplinary Update Consensus" was presented at the 24th National Congress of the German Cancer Society on March 21st and subsequently evaluated and approved by the various German scientific medical societies.
CONTEXT: Postmenopausal women aged 55 years and older have 66% of incident breast tumors and experience 77% of breast cancer mortality, but other age-related health problems may affect tumor prognosis and treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To document the comorbidity burden of postmenopausal breast cancer patients and evaluate its relationship with age on disease stage, treatment, and early mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were collected on breast cancer patients' comorbidities by retrospective hospital medical records review and merged with information on patients' tumor characteristics collected from 6 regional National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries. Patients were followed up until death or for 30 months from breast cancer diagnosis. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based random sample of 1800 postmenopausal breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1992 stratified by 3 age groups: 55 to 64 years, 65 to 74 years, and 75 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Extent of disease, therapy received, comorbidity, cause of death, and survival. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent (1312 of 1800) of the sample was diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer, 10% (n = 188) with stage III and IV breast cancer, and 17% (n = 300) did not have a stage assignment. Of the 1017 patients with stage I and stage II node-negative breast cancer, 95% received therapy in agreement with the National Institutes of Health consensus statement recommendation for early-stage breast cancer. Patients in older age groups were less likely to receive therapy consistent with the consensus statement (P<.001), and women aged 70 years and older were significantly less likely to receive axillary lymph node dissection as determined by logistic regression analysis (P<.01). Diabetes, renal failure, stroke, liver disease, a previous malignant tumor, and smoking were significant in predicting early mortality in a statistical model that included age and disease stage. Breast cancer was the underlying cause of death for 135 decedents (51.3%). Heart disease (n = 45, 17.1%) and previous cancers (n = 22, 8.4%) were the next major underlying causes. In the 30-month follow-up period, 263 patients (15%) died. CONCLUSION: Patient care decisions occur in the context of breast cancer and other age-related conditions. Comorbidity in older patients may limit the ability to obtain prognostic information (ie, axillary lymph node dissection), tends to minimize treatment options (eg, breast-conserving therapy), and increases the risk of death from causes other than breast cancer.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a chronic, lifestyle-limiting disease and is an independent predictor of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ischemic events. Despite the recognition that PAD is associated with a marked increase in the risk of ischemic events, this particular manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis is largely underdiagnosed and undertreated. The risk of PAD is markedly increased among individuals with diabetes, and ischemic event rates are higher in diabetic individuals with PAD than in comparable non-diabetic populations. Consequently, early diagnosis and treatment of PAD in patients with diabetes is critically important in order to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, minimize the risk of long-term disability, and improve quality of life. A diagnosis of PAD in patients with diabetes mandates a multi-faceted treatment approach, involving aggressive risk-factor modification, antiplatelet therapy, and revascularization procedures. The American Diabetes Association recently issued a consensus statement on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of PAD in patients with diabetes. This article will review the clinical implications of the consensus statement and highlight the treatment options available in order to help prevent future ischemic events in diabetic individuals with PAD.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is transmitted by injection drug use and associated with psychiatric conditions. Patients with drug use or significant psychiatric illness have typically been excluded from HCV treatment trials noting the 1997 National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement on HCV that indicated active drug use and major depressive illness were contraindications to treatment of HCV infection. However, the 2002 NIH Consensus Statement recognized that these patients could be effectively treated for HCV infection and recommended that treatment be considered on a case-by-case basis. Treating HCV infection in these patients is challenging, with drug use relapse possibly leading to psychosocial instability, poor adherence, and HCV reinfection. Interferon therapy may exacerbate preexisting psychiatric symptoms. Co-occurring human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B virus provide additional challenges, and access to ancillary medical and psychiatric services may be limited. Patients with co-occurring HCV infection, substance use, and psychiatric illness can complete interferon treatment with careful monitoring and aggressive intervention. Clinicians must integrate early interventions for psychiatric conditions and drug use into their treatment algorithm. Few programs or treatment models are designed to manage co-occurring substance use, psychiatric illness, and HCV infection and therapy. The National Institute on Drug Abuse convened a panel of experts to address the current status and the long-range needs through a 2-day workshop, Co-occurring Hepatitis C, Substance Abuse, and Psychiatric Illness: Addressing the Issues and Developing Integrated Models of Care. This conference report summarizes current data, medical management issues, and strategies discussed.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of family physicians in providing support and care to caregivers for people with dementia. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Data were obtained from Alzheimer Society guidelines, published consensus statements, and guidelines for family physicians caring for people with dementia and their caregivers. Most of the reported findings and recommendations are based on information from expert consensus statements and opinion. MAIN MESSAGE: Caring for people with dementia causes substantial psychological and physical morbidity. Services developed for caregivers (in-home respite and individual psychological interventions) and comprehensive support programs are helpful in relieving caregiver distress. There is a role for family physicians in following caregivers longitudinally to assess their physical and emotional health and coping skills, to provide information and assistance in dealing with problems as they arise, to assist caregivers in mobilizing family and friends, and to facilitate referrals to appropriate services and resources. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians have an important role in identifying caregiver problems and providing direct and ongoing support to caregivers in their day-to-day role.
More efficacious anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents have been introduced in vascular medicine and in the prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolisms. Patient management should be guided by familiarity with the pharmacology of coagulation-altering drugs and by consensus statements. The present paper reviews recommendations from the Austrian Task Force for Perioperative Coagulation which are based on thorough evaluation of the available pharmacological information and case reports. The consensus statement focuses on neuraxial and peripheral techniques and is designed to encourage safe and quality patient care.
A Swedish national consensus statement concerning prevention and management of pain in the newborn infant has been prepared by members of the Swedish Paediatric Pain Society (Svensk Barnsmärtförening, SBSF). The document is based on the Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn Infant by Anand et al [1].
OBJECTIVE: The 'HICPAC guidelines', published in the USA in 1995 stressed the crucial role of restrictive usage of glycopeptides in the strategy to limit the emergence and spread of resistant enterococci. Because controversy still remains in Belgium on the necessity and feasability of restricting glycopeptide usage, the infectious diseases advisory board (IDAB) developed a consensus statement on the judicious use of glycopeptides in Belgium. METHODS: The literature on the indications for glycopeptide treatment was reviewed, categorized and discussed by a working party of the IDAB.Consequently, the IDAB reached consensus on the warranted indications for glycopeptide use in Belgium. RESULTS: The opinion of the IDAB-members is reported in a consensus statement specifying the indications for treatment and for prophylaxis with glycopeptide antimicrobials, as well as the situations where glycopeptides should not be used, taking into account the specific epidemiology of bacterial resistance, the availability of antibiotics and the common prescribing practices in Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: The IDAB concludes that restrictive usage of glycopeptides must also be a priority in Belgium. Guidelines on the judicious use of these antibiotics adapted to the national situations must contribute to this objective.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence behind specific but common patient care decisions in support of enteral feedings for patients admitted to intensive care units. Six specific questions were developed and refined to address clinical outcomes specific to clinical practice decisions pertinent to enteral feeding of critically ill patients. The data sources consisted of an intensive literature review from five databases, using standardized search terms. Randomized controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, consensus statements, reviews, US Food and Drug Administration alerts, and case reports were selected for study. Research reports were abstracted in detail and evaluated for research quality using the criteria developed by the American Dietetic Association. Consensus statements regarding the influence of specific enteral feeding methods on key clinical outcomes (ie, infectious complications, cost, length of hospital stay, and mortality) were developed and graded based on the quality of the available evidence. The data support the use of enteral over parenteral nutrition to reduce infectious complications and cost, and the initiation of enteral feedings within 24 to 48 hours of injury or admission to an intensive care unit to reduce infectious complications and length of hospital stay in head injury and trauma patients. Postpyloric tube placement is associated with reduced gastric residual volume and reflux, but adequately powered trials are not available to support prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Acceptance of gastric residual volumes of up to 250 mL may increase volume of formula delivered. Promotility agents are associated with reduced gastric residual volume. Feeding patients in the semirecumbent rather than supine position is associated with reduced aspiration pneumonia and pharyngoesophageal formula reflux. Actual delivery of 14 to 18 kcal/kg/day or 60% to 70% of goal is associated with improved outcomes, whereas greater intake may not be in some populations. Blue food coloring should not be used with enteral feedings due to its limited sensitivity for aspiration and some risk of mortality. Well-designed, adequately powered, randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to evaluate any benefit of tube tip position on aspiration pneumonia or mortality, and of early enteral feedings on mortality.
The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Melanoma brought together experts in dermatology, pathology, epidemiology, public education, surveillance techniques, and potential new technologies, as well as other health care professionals and the public, to address (a) the clinical and histological characteristics of early melanoma; (b) the appropriate diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with early melanoma; (c) the role of dysplastic nevi and their significance; and (d) the role of education and screening in preventing melanoma morbidity and mortality. Following 2 days of presentations by experts and discussion by the audience, a consensus panel weighted the evidence and prepared a consensus statement. The panel agreed (a) that melanoma in situ is a distinct entity that can be treated effectively by surgery with 0.5-cm margins and that thin, invasive melanoma < 1 mm thick has the potential for long-term survival in < 90% of patients after surgical excision with a 1-cm margin; (b) that elective lymph node dissections and extensive staging evaluations should not be recommended in early melanoma; (c) that patients with early melanoma are at low risk for relapse but may be at high risk for development of subsequent melanomas and therefore should be followed closely; (d) that some family members of patients with melanoma are at increased risk for melanoma and therefore should be enrolled in surveillance programs; and (e) that education and screening programs have the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality from melanoma. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.
In early 1996 the Venous Leg Ulcer Guideline was developed for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers. In order to discuss the development of standards in general, and the Venous Leg Ulcer Guideline in particular, we first need to understand the difference between the following terms: Critical pathway, consensus statement, guideline, and standard. There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of guidelines. In the development of a guideline, endorsement by a respected colleague is important. Development of the Venous Leg Ulcer Guideline began with a consensus statement and then underwent review by a national advisory panel and national peer review through publication. A revised guideline has now been developed which will be tested in a pilot study for clinical efficacy, effect on cost, and impact on quality of life. Validation will require implementation in a prospective clinical trial. Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm forms for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers were developed as part of the preliminary testing of the guideline. Although guidelines do not substitute for good clinical judgement, they can encourage clinical judgement and help reduce fragmented care and the costs associated with inappropriate treatments.
Antihistamines are effective medications that have been used for decades in the management of allergic rhinitis; however, they may be administered or selected in an inappropriate fashion and may be the source of drug-related morbidity. Our objective is to present relevant background information and an expert consensus statement on the use of antihistamines in treatment of allergic rhinitis. In July 2002, 14 experts in allergy, clinical immunology, pharmacology, and impairment assessment were invited to participate in a roundtable conference to present current concepts and develop a consensus statement on the clinical management of allergic rhinitis with antihistamines. Many of the antihistamines used to treat allergic rhinitis, as well as the disease itself, may produce sedation, impairment, and reduced quality of life. Allergic rhinitis is more appropriately managed with the relatively nonimpairing second-generation antihistamines (eg, loratadine, desloratadine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine), because older agents (eg, diphenhydramine, chlorpheniramine, and brompheniramine) produce sedation and impairment and worsen sleep architecture. Although there is some debate surrounding the varying degrees of efficacy of second-generation antihistamines, it is known that some agents may produce varying levels of drowsiness or impairment, especially at higher than recommended doses. The differences with regard to safety among the second-generation antihistamines are smaller than are the differences between the first and second generations. A nonsedating, nonimpairing (even at higher than recommended doses), second-generation antihistamine is preferred for all patients, particularly those with a higher risk for the development of adverse effects. We recommend that primary care and specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, and all other health professionals involved in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis follow this consensus document and share this information with patients for whom antihistamine therapy is recommended. In addition, further epidemiologic studies on the effects of antihistamines should be performed.