Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Benchmark”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Criteria and benchmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a free-standing ambulatory center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Keys to economic survival in an era of decreasing reimbursement include controlling costs and avoiding complications. In an effort to reduce costs, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed with same-day discharge from a hospital setting. The free-standing ambulatory surgery center offers even greater cost savings if safety can be assured. Facility charges, surgical technique and instrument selection influence the costs of the procedure. METHODS: A database was accumulated prospectively on the first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center to assess costs, logistical constraints, and safety. RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomies were accomplished in 99 of 100 patients. One patient was suspected of having cancer during laparoscopy and was transferred to a nearby hospital for open cholecystectomy. There were no other postoperative hospitalizations for complications. The fixed facility charge for the procedure was $2,990, and the total costs for all routinely disposable items (gowns, gloves, instruments, and adhesive bandages was $98. The mean OR time was 29 minutes (standard deviation 13.7). CONCLUSIONS: The free-standing ambulatory surgery center is an appropriate facility for an experienced operating team to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients. The surgeon's selection of appropriate energy sources and instruments is essential to complete the operation in a most cost-effective manner.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Benchmarks for evaluating health care networks].

The implementation of health care networks is accompanied by a certain number of changes in professional practices. At the heart of the economic, organisational, and political stakes, new questions are posed, especially in terms of evaluation. It is true that no matter what the level of evaluation, it is essential today to rely on the support of existing information systems to develop methodologies and to better describe the produced effects, in economic terms and health outcomes, but also from a more qualitative point of view, in terms of public satisfaction and benefits to clients. Laying down some reference points for evaluating health care networks can only contribute to developing new strategies for showing their effectiveness and efficiency and learning from this experimentation.

Benchmarking↗