Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54Linked to original sources

Repression of insulin gene expression by adenovirus type 5 E1a proteins.

Insulin gene transcription relies on enhancer and promoter elements which are active in pancreatic beta cells. We showed that adenovirus type 5 infection of HIT T-15 cells, a transformed hamster beta cell line, represses insulin gene transcription and mRNA levels. Using expression plasmids transiently introduced into HIT T-15 cells, we showed that adenovirus type 5 E1a transcription regulatory proteins repress insulin enhancer-promoter element activity as assayed with a surrogate xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene. We relate E1a repression of the insulin gene to other examples of repression of enhancer-dependent genes by E1a and discuss the possible relationship of this repression to insulin gene regulation.

Adenoviridae↗

Histone H1 represses transcription from minichromosomes assembled in vitro.

We have previously shown that transcription from a Xenopus 5S rRNA gene assembled into chromatin in vitro can be repressed in the absence of histone H1 at high nucleosome densities (one nucleosome per 160 base pairs of DNA) (A. Shimamura, D. Tremethick, and A. Worcel, Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4257-4269, 1988). We report here that transcriptional repression may also be achieved at lower nucleosome densities (one nucleosome per 215 base pairs of DNA) when histone H1 is present. Removal of histone H1 from the minichromosomes with Biorex under conditions in which no nucleosome disruption was observed led to transcriptional activation. Transcriptional repression could be restored by adding histone H1 back to the H1-depleted minichromosomes. The levels of histone H1 that repressed the H1-depleted minichromosomes failed to repress transcription from free DNA templates present in trans. The assembly of transcription complexes onto the H1-depleted minichromosomes protected the 5S RNA gene from inactivation by histone H1.

Animals↗

Spatial repression of PCNA by p53 during kidney development.

Transcriptional repression is a key mechanism for the spatial specification of gene expression and cell fate determination. During kidney development, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is expressed in the nephrogenic zone and is downregulated rapidly as renal epithelial cells enter terminal differentiation and acquire functional characteristics. Our laboratory reported that the transcription factor p53 stimulates the terminal differentiation of renal epithelial cells by means of transcriptional activation of renal function genes (Saifudeen Z, Dipp S, and El-Dahr SS. J Clin Invest 109: 1021-1030, 2002). Because p53-induced growth arrest correlates with downregulation of PCNA gene expression, we examined the impact of p53 inactivation on PCNA expression in mice and evaluated the effect of p53 on PCNA transcription. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the transition from nephrogenesis to terminal epithelial cell differentiation correlates with accumulation of the transcription factor p53. Importantly, the spatially restricted pattern of PCNA expression is disrupted in kidneys of p53-deficient pups, in which there was a redistribution of PCNA expression into the differentiation zone (without a change in total kidney PCNA content) and distortion of the tubular architecture. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that the binding of kidney nuclear extracts to the p53 response elements in human and rat PCNA promoters is developmentally regulated. Transient transfection assays performed in p53-deficient HeLa cells revealed that exogenous p53 strongly represses transcription from human PCNA promoter-reporter constructs. Interestingly, deletion of the p53-binding site confers enhanced responsiveness to p53-mediated repression, suggesting that transcriptional repression of PCNA by p53 is achieved by a mechanism other than direct DNA binding. On the basis of these results, we propose the hypothesis that p53-mediated transcriptional repression plays a role in the spatial restriction of PCNA gene expression during normal renal development.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

SREBP-1 binds to multiple sites and transactivates the human ApoA-II promoter in vitro : SREBP-1 mutants defective in DNA binding or transcriptional activation repress ApoA-II promoter activity.

-Screening of an expression human liver cDNA library resulted in the isolation of several cDNA clones homologous to sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) that recognize the regulatory element AIIAB and AIIK of the human apoA-II promoter. DNaseI footprinting of the apoA-II promoter using SREBP-1 (1 to 460) expressed in bacteria identified 5 overall protected regions designated AIIAB (-64 to -48), AIICD (-178 to -154), AIIDE (-352 to -332), AIIHI (-594 to -574), and AIIK (-760 to -743). These regions contain inverted E-box palindromic or direct repeat motifs and bind SREBP-1 with different affinities. Transient cotransfection experiments in HepG2 cells showed that SREBP-1 transactivated the -911/29 apoA-II promoter 3.5-fold as well as truncated apoA-II promoter segments that contain 1, 2, 3, or 4 SREBP binding sites. Mutagenesis analysis showed that transactivation by SREBP was mainly affected by mutations in element AIIAB. Despite the strong transactivation of the apoA-II promoter by SREBP-1 we could not demonstrate significant changes on the endogenous apoA-II mRNA levels of HepG2 cells after cotransfection with SREBP-1 or in the presence or absence of cholesterol and 25-OH-cholesterol. An SREBP-1 mutant lacking the amino-terminal activation domain bound normally to its cognate sites and repressed the apoA-II promoter activity. Repression was also caused by specific amino acid substitutions of Leu, Val, or Gly for Lys359, which affected DNA binding. Repression by the DNA binding-deficient mutants was abolished by deletion of the amino-terminal activation domain (1 to 90) of SREBP-1. Overall, the findings suggest that the wild-type SREBP-1 can bind and transactivate efficiently the apoA-II promoter in cell culture. SREBP-1 mutants lacking the activation domain bind to their cognate sites and directly repress the apoA-II promoter whereas mutants defective in DNA binding indirectly repress the apoA-II promoter activity, possibly by a squelching mechanism.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Dexamethasone-mediated repression of MUC5AC gene expression in human lung epithelial cells.

Glucocorticoids regulate gene expression via binding of the ligand-activated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to glucocorticoid-responsive elements (GRE) in target gene promoters. The MUC5AC gene, which encodes the protein backbone of an abundant secreted airway mucin, has several putative GRE cis-elements in its 5' sequence. Mechanism(s) whereby glucocorticoids regulate mucin genes have not previously been described. In this study, the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex) decreased MUC5AC mRNA abundance in A549 and NCI-H292 cell lines and primary differentiated normal bronchial epithelial cells by 50-80%, suggesting a common mechanism of MUC5AC gene repression in human lung epithelial cells. Kinetic analyses showed that MUC5AC mRNA was not significantly decreased until 6 h after Dex exposure, and that nuclear translocation of GR was biphasic, suggesting that Dex-mediated cis-repression of MUC5AC gene expression was a delayed response of GR translocation. Transfection analyses demonstrated that Dex transcriptionally repressed the MUC5AC promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with wild-type and mutant oligonucleotide probes showed that GR bound to two GRE cis-sites (nucleotides -930 to -912 and -369 to -351) in the MUC5AC promoter. Analyses of mutated MUC5AC promoter constructs demonstrated that NF-kappaB cis-sites were not involved in Dex-mediated repression of MUC5AC. Dex did not alter mRNA stability of MUC5AC transcripts. Taken together, the data indicate that Dex transcriptionally mediates repression of MUC5AC gene expression in human lung epithelial cells at quiescent states after binding of GR to one or more GRE cis-elements in the MUC5AC promoter.

Cell Line↗

NRG1 is required for glucose repression of the SUC2 and GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

BACKGROUND: Glucose repression of transcription in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been shown to be controlled by several factors, including two repressors called Mig1 and Mig2. Past results suggest that other repressors may be involved in glucose repression. RESULTS: By a screen for factors that control transcription of the glucose-repressible SUC2 gene of S. cerevisiae, the NRG1 gene was identified. Analysis of an nrg1Delta mutant has demonstrated that mRNA levels are elevated at both the SUC2 and of the GAL genes of S. cerevisiae when cells are grown under normally glucose-repressing conditions. In addition, genetic interactions have been detected between nrg1Delta and other factors that control SUC2 transcription. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of nrg1Delta demonstrates that Nrg1 plays a role in glucose repression of the SUC2 and GAL genes of S. cerevisiae. Thus, three repressors, Nrg1, Mig1, and Mig2, are involved as the downstream targets of the glucose signaling in S. cerevisiae.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Novel repression of the glucocorticoid receptor by anthrax lethal toxin.

Death from anthrax has been reported to occur from systemic shock. The lethal toxin (LeTx) is the major effector of anthrax mortality. Although the mechanism of entry of this toxin into cells is well understood, its actions once inside the cell are not as well understood. LeTx is known to cleave and inactivate MAPKKs. We have recently shown that LeTx represses the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) both in vitro and in vivo. This repression is partial and specific, repressing the glucocorticoid, progesterone, and estrogen receptor alpha, but not the mineralocorticoid or estrogen receptor beta. This toxin does not affect GR ligand or DNA binding, and we have suggested that it may function by removing/inactivating one or more of the many cofactors involved in nuclear hormone receptor signaling. Although the precise involvement of this nuclear hormone receptor repression in LeTx toxicity is unknown, examples of blunted HPA axis and glucocorticoid signaling in numerous autoimmune/inflammatory diseases suggest that such repression of critically important receptors could have deleterious effects on health.

Animals↗

Transcriptional repression of the ovine follicle-stimulating hormone-beta gene by 17 beta-estradiol.

Direct transcriptional inhibition of the gene that encodes ovine FSH beta-subunit (oFSH beta) by 17 beta-estradiol (E2) has been previously demonstrated by our laboratory. To determine which cis-acting elements in the 5'-flanking region of this gene may be involved in E2 regulation, DNA constructs containing deletions of the 5'-end of the oFSH beta gene were fused to a luciferase reporter and tested in transient transfection assays. These oFSH beta-luciferase constructs and the human E2 receptor expression vector (HEO) were transfected into primary cultures of ovine pituitary cells and subsequently tested with E2. Expression of the largest oFSH beta-luciferase construct (-4741 to +759 of oFSH beta) was inhibited 50% by 20 nM E2. Repression was dependent upon cotransfection of estrogen receptor (HEO) and was E2 dose dependent, with an apparent ED50 similar to that of the positive control consensus estrogen-responsive element construct, ERETk-LUC (ED50 = 50 pM). Deletion studies indicated that sequences between- 105 and -84 bp are necessary for this repression. In addition, a synthetic nucleotide containing oFSH beta sequences from - 105 to -72 could direct E2-dependent repression of a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter that drives luciferase expression. Additional experiments showed that no tissue-specific elements were required for either basal expression or E2-directed transcriptional repression. Although there are no consensus DNA response elements for the estrogen receptor between -105 and +759 of the oFSH beta gene, cotransfection of a mutant E2 receptor lacking the DNA-binding domain (HE-11) failed to mediate E2-dependent inhibition. Gel retardation studies, using the oligonucleotide-containing oFSH beta sequences from -105 to -72, indicated no evidence of direct binding of the estrogen receptor to DNA from -105 to -72. The studies presented here indicate that transcriptional repression of the oFSH beta gene by E2 may be directed in vivo by 5'-flanking sequences between -105 and -72 of the oFSH beta gene. Furthermore, the data suggest that inhibition is mediated via E2 receptor-protein interactions with basal transcription factors that may bind to the -105/-72 DNA directly.

Animals↗

Neurogenin3 activates the islet differentiation program while repressing its own expression.

Expression of the proendocrine factor Neurogenin3 determines which progenitor cells in the developing pancreas will differentiate into the endocrine cells of the islets of Langerhans. To better understand how Neurogenin3 directs endocrine differentiation, we examined the mechanisms by which Neurogenin3 regulates the promoters of three transcription factor genes expressed in endocrine precursor cells: the nkx2.2 gene, the PAX4 gene, and the NEUROG3 gene, the human gene encoding Neurogenin3 itself. The function of all three promoters depends on at least one critical E box, a common DNA sequence that forms a binding site for basic helix-loop-helix proteins like Neurogenin3. Neurogenin3 bound to and effectively activated transcription through the nkx2.2 and PAX4 E boxes. In contrast, Neurogenin3 strongly repressed the NEUROG3 promoter, although a proximal E box was required for activity in the absence of Neurogenin3, suggesting that a ubiquitous transcriptional activator may bind to this site, and that Neurogenin3 could act as a competitive inhibitor of this activator. This hypothesis was supported by the lack of evidence for significant intrinsic transcriptional repression capacity in the Neurogenin3 protein, and by the ability of isolated DNA-binding basic helix-loop-helix domains to repress the NEUROG3 promoter. Neurogenin3 produced additional repression, however, when the protein included an intact transcriptional activation domain, suggesting that it may also induce the expression of a downstream transcriptional repressor. In summary, while Neurogenin3 orchestrates islet cell differentiation by activating islet cell transcription factor genes, it simultaneously represses its own promoter.

3T3 Cells↗

Retinoic acid receptor-alpha is stabilized in a repressive state by its C-terminal, isotype-specific F domain.

Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) are hormone-regulated transcription factors that play multiple roles in vertebrate development and differentiation. Three isotypes of RARs, alpha, beta, and gamma, are encoded by distinct genetic loci and possess distinct transcriptional properties. Typically, RARalpha represses target gene transcription in the absence of hormone, whereas RARbeta and gamma fail to repress under these conditions. This inability of RARbeta and RARgamma to repress transcription is due to intramolecular interactions between helix 3 and helix 12 of the hormone binding domains of these isotypes that inhibit corepressor binding while favoring coactivator binding. We report here that the converse ability of RARalpha to repress requires the integrity of the receptor F domain, a domain that maps C-terminal to helix 12, varies in sequence among different nuclear receptors, and is of poorly understood function. The F domain appears to help stabilize helix 12 of RARalpha in a more open position that enhances corepressor binding and inhibits coactivator binding in the absence of hormone. Intriguingly, the RARalpha F domain is isotype autonomous in its function. We speculate that the RARalpha F domain may dock elsewhere on the receptor surface, and this intramolecular interaction may maintain RARalpha helix 12 in an open, repression-competent conformation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The nuclear receptor corepressor deacetylase activating domain is essential for repression by thyroid hormone receptor.

Nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) mediates repression by thyroid hormone receptor (TR) as well as other nuclear hormone receptors and transcription factors. N-CoR contains several repression domains that repress transcription when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain, but their relative importance in the full-length N-CoR molecule is unknown. Here we addressed this important issue by depleting N-CoR in human cells and replacing it with mutant and wild-type murine N-CoR. Although the N-terminal RD binds transducin beta-like protein 1 (TBL1), TBLR1, and mSin3, deletion of this region did not affect the ability of N-CoR to mediate repression by TR. By contrast, deletion of the deacetylase activating domain (DAD) that binds and activates histone deacetylase 3 dramatically hampered N-CoR's function as a TR corepressor. Introduction of a single amino acid mutation in the DAD similarly disabled the corepressor function of N-CoR. Thus, the DAD domain of N-CoR is singularly essential for repression by TR.

Amidohydrolases↗

Mechanism of repression of the inhibin alpha-subunit gene by inducible 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate early repressor.

The rodent ovary is regulated throughout the reproductive cycle to maintain normal cyclicity. Ovarian follicular development is controlled by changes in gene expression in response to the gonadotropins FSH and LH. The inhibin alpha-subunit gene belongs to a group of genes that is positively regulated by FSH and negatively regulated by LH. Previous studies established an important role for inducible cAMP early repressor (ICER) in repression of alpha-inhibin. These current studies investigate the mechanisms of repression by ICER. It is not clear whether all four ICER isoforms expressed in the ovary can act as repressors of the inhibin alpha-subunit gene. EMSAs demonstrate binding of all isoforms to the inhibin alpha-subunit CRE (cAMP response element), and transfection studies demonstrate that all isoforms can repress the inhibin alpha-subunit gene. Repression by ICER is dependent on its binding to DNA as demonstrated by mutations to ICER's DNA-binding domain. These mutational studies also demonstrate that repression by ICER is not dependent on heterodimerization with CREB (CRE-binding protein). Competitive EMSAs show that ICER effectively competes with CREB for binding to the inhibin alpha CRE in vitro. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate a replacement of CREB dimers bound to the inhibin alpha CRE by ICER dimers in ovarian granulosa cells in response to LH signaling. Thus, there is a temporal association of transcription factors bound to the inhibin alpha-CRE controlling inhibin alpha-subunit gene expression.

Animals↗

Differential effects of nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) expression levels on retinoic acid receptor-mediated repression support the existence of dynamically regulated corepressor complexes.

Thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors that stimulate the transcription of target genes in the presence of activating ligands and repress transcription in their absence. Transcriptional repression by the thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors has been proposed to be mediated by the nuclear receptor corepressor, N-CoR, or the related factor, SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors). Recent studies have suggested that transcriptional repression by N-CoR involves a corepressor complex that also contains mSin3A/B and the histone deacetylase, RPD3. In this manuscript, we demonstrate that transcriptional repression by the retinoic acid receptor can be either positively or negatively regulated by changes in the levels of N-CoR expression, suggesting a relatively strict stoichiometric relationship between N-CoR and other components of the corepressor complex. Consistent with this interpretation, overexpression of several functionally defined domains of N-CoR also relieve repression by nuclear receptors. N-CoR is distributed throughout the nucleus in a nonuniform pattern, and a subpopulation becomes concentrated into several discrete dot structures when highly expressed. RPD3 is also widely distributed throughout the nucleus in a nonuniform pattern. Simultaneous imaging of RPD3 and N-CoR suggest that a subset of each of these proteins colocalize, consistent with the existence of coactivator complexes containing both proteins. In addition, a substantial fraction of both N-CoR and mSin3 A/B appear to be independently distributed. These observations suggest that interactions between RPD3 and Sin3/N-CoR complexes may be dynamically regulated.

Animals↗

5'TG3' interacting factor interacts with Sin3A and represses AR-mediated transcription.

Like other nuclear receptors, the AR exerts its transcriptional function by binding to cis elements upstream of promoters and interacting with other transcriptional factors (e.g. activators, repressors, and modulators). Among them, histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) play critical roles in altering the acetylation state of core histones, thereby regulating nuclear hormone receptor-mediated transcription. The nuclear receptor corepressor can repress the TR and RAR in the absence of ligand through either a Sin3A-dependent or -independent manner by recruiting HDACs. AR and some other steroid hormone receptors cannot silence transcription through a similar mechanism in that they are located in the cytoplasm as complexes with heat-shock proteins before exposure to ligand. It has been shown that AR can bind to p160/SRC, cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein (CBP)/P300 and other coactivators to increase the AR-mediated transcription. However, the molecular mechanism for turning AR from transcriptionally active into silent states is unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that the transcription repressor, 5'TG3' interacting factor (TGIF), selectively represses AR-mediated transcription from several AR-responsive promoters. The repression is mediated through binding of TGIF to the DNA binding domain of AR and is trichostatin sensitive. We also identified a direct protein-protein interaction between TGIF and a transcription corepressor, Sin3A, which suggests a novel pathway for TGIF recruiting HDAC1 to the repression complex. These results provide fresh insight into understanding the mechanism for repressing AR-, and perhaps other steroid hormone receptor-, mediated transcriptions.

Animals↗

The Caenorhabditis elegans spalt-like gene sem-4 restricts touch cell fate by repressing the selector Hox gene egl-5 and the effector gene mec-3.

Members of the spalt (sal) gene family encode zinc-finger proteins that are putative tumor suppressors and regulate anteroposterior (AP) patterning, cellular identity, and, possibly, cell cycle progression. The mechanism through which sal genes carry out these functions is unclear. The Caenorhabditis elegans sal gene sem-4 controls the fate of several different cell types, including neurons, muscle and hypodermis. Mutation of sem-4 transforms particular tail neurons into touch-neuron-like cells. In wild-type C. elegans, six touch receptor neurons mediate the response of the worm to gentle touch. All six touch neurons normally express the LIM homeobox gene mec-3. A subset, the two PLM cells, also express the Hox gene egl-5, an Abdominal-B homolog, which we find is required for correct mec-3 expression in these cells. The abnormal touch-neuron-like-cells in sem-4 animals express mec-3; we show that a subset also express egl-5. We report: (1) that ectopic expression of sem-4 in normal touch cells represses mec-3 expression and reduces touch cell function; (2) that egl-5 expression is required for both the fate of normal PLM touch neurons in wild-type animals and the fate of a subset of abnormal touch neurons in sem-4 animals, and (3) that SEM-4 specifically binds a shared motif in the mec-3 and egl-5 promoters that mediates repression of these genes in cells in the tail. We conclude that sem-4 represses egl-5 and mec-3 through direct interaction with regulatory sequences in the promoters of these genes, that sem-4 indirectly modulates mec-3 expression through its repression of egl-5 and that this negative regulation is required for proper determination of neuronal fates. We suggest that the mechanism and targets of regulation by sem-4 are conserved throughout the sal gene family: other sal genes might regulate patterning and cellular identity through direct repression of Hox selector genes and effector genes.

Animals↗

Bar homeodomain proteins are anti-proneural in the Drosophila eye: transcriptional repression of atonal by Bar prevents ectopic retinal neurogenesis.

Atonal (Ato)/Math (Mammalian atonal homolog) family proneural proteins are key regulators of neurogenesis in both vertebrates and invertebrates. In the Drosophila eye, Ato is essential for the generation of photoreceptor neurons. Ato expression is initiated at the anterior ridge of the morphogenetic furrow but is repressed in the retinal precursor cells behind the furrow to prevent ectopic neurogenesis. We show that Ato repression is mediated by the conserved homeobox proteins BarH1 and BarH2. Loss of Bar causes cell-autonomous ectopic Ato expression, resulting in excess photoreceptor clusters. The initial ommatidial spacing at the furrow occurs normally in the absence of Bar, suggesting that the ectopic neurogenesis within Bar mutant clones is not due to the lack of Notch (N)-dependent lateral inhibition. Targeted misexpression of Bar is sufficient to repress ato expression. Furthermore, we provide evidence that Bar represses ato expression at the level of transcription without affecting the expression of an ato activator, Cubitus interruptus (Ci). Thus, we propose that Bar is essential for transcriptional repression of ato and the prevention of ectopic neurogenesis behind the furrow.

Animals↗

Pelota controls self-renewal of germline stem cells by repressing a Bam-independent differentiation pathway.

In the Drosophila ovary, germline stem cell (GSC) self-renewal is controlled by both extrinsic and intrinsic factors. The Bmp signal from niche cells controls GSC self-renewal by directly repressing a Bam-dependent differentiation pathway in GSCs. pelota (pelo), which has been previously shown to be required for Drosophila male meiosis, was identified in our genetic screen as a dominant suppressor of the dpp overexpression-induced GSC tumor phenotype. In this study, we reveal the unexpected new role of Pelo in controlling GSC self-renewal by repressing a Bam-independent differentiation pathway. In pelo mutant ovaries, GSCs are lost rapidly owing to differentiation. Results from genetic mosaic analysis and germ cell-specific rescue show that it functions as an intrinsic factor to control GSC self-renewal. In pelo mutant GSCs, Bmp signaling activity detected by Dad-lacZ expression is downregulated, but bam expression is still repressed. Furthermore, bam mutant germ cells are still able to differentiate into cystocytes without pelo function, indicating that Pelo is involved in repressing a Bam-independent differentiation pathway. Consistent with its homology to the eukaryotic translation release factor 1alpha, we show that Pelo is localized to the cytoplasm of the GSC. Therefore, Pelo controls GSC self-renewal by repressing a Bam-independent differentiation pathway possibly through regulating translation. As Pelo is highly conserved from Drosophila to mammals, it may also be involved in the regulation of adult stem cell self-renewal in mammals, including humans.

Animals↗

Regional repression of a Drosophila POU box gene in the endoderm involves inductive interactions between germ layers.

An induction process occurring between the mesodermal and the endodermal germ layers has recently been described in the regulation of the Drosophila homeotic gene labial (lab). We report here that proper spatial regulation of the Drosophila POU box gene pdm-1 products also involves interaction between these two germ layers. pdm-1 transcripts are initially present in both the anterior and the posterior endodermal midgut primordia. Upon fusion of the two primordia, transcripts disappear from two regions in the endoderm, a central domain and an anterior domain. The anterior repression domain of pdm-1 is independent of the expression of known homeotic genes and genes encoding secreted signalling molecules in the visceral mesoderm, both for its positioning and its repression. Repression in the central domain requires both the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and the decapentaplegic (dpp) gene, which encodes a secreted protein. Both of these genes are also required for lab induction. However, the analysis of pdm-1 expression in various mutant backgrounds indicates that the regulation of lab and pdm-1 across germ layers is controlled by different genetic cascades. Our study indicates that dpp is not the signal that dictates central pdm-1 repression across germ layers and suggests that in the same midgut region, different signalling pathways result in the differential activation or repression of potential transcription factors.

Animals↗