PubMed2003
Functional load transmission and kinematic performance were compared for standard versus posterior-stabilized versions of a rotating-platform total knee implant, over a standardized loading cycle, using three-dimensional contact finite element analysis. These two design variants differ primarily in terms of the latter's polyethylene insert having a cam that engages with the femoral component during appreciable flexion, thereby inducing femoral component rollback. The finite element model, previously validated experimentally, afforded direct comparisons of anterior lift-off of the insert from the tibial tray, of bearing mobility (insert rotation about the pivot post), of femoral rollback, and of metal-on-polyethylene contact stresses at the bearing and backside surfaces of the insert. Both design variants generally performed comparably, exhibiting an internal and external rotation range of approximately 5 degrees, approximately 1.5 mm peak lift-off at the anterior aspect of the insert, and approximately 15 mm of posterior rollback, the respective maxima for both designs occurring at approximately the same instants in the gait cycle. However, the posterior-stabilized design had slightly more rollback, and slightly less anterior lift-off and rotation, than did the standard rotating-platform design. Peak polyethylene stresses occurred on the backside of the insert near the posterior edge of the medial compartment, the magnitude being approximately 18% higher for the posterior-stabilized design (21 MPa) than for the standard design.