Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DROSOPHILA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54Linked to original sources

Telomere loss in somatic cells of Drosophila causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Checkpoint mechanisms that respond to DNA damage in the mitotic cell cycle are necessary to maintain the fidelity of chromosome transmission. These mechanisms must be able to distinguish the normal telomeres of linear chromosomes from double-strand break damage. However, on several occasions, Drosophila chromosomes that lack their normal telomeric DNA have been recovered, raising the issue of whether Drosophila is able to distinguish telomeric termini from nontelomeric breaks. We used site-specific recombination on a dispensable chromosome to induce the formation of a dicentric chromosome and an acentric, telomere-bearing, chromosome fragment in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. The acentric fragment is lost when cells divide and the dicentric breaks, transmitting a chromosome that has lost a telomere to each daughter cell. In the eye imaginal disc, cells with a newly broken chromosome initially experience mitotic arrest and then undergo apoptosis when cells are induced to divide as the eye differentiates. Therefore, Drosophila cells can detect and respond to a single broken chromosome. It follows that transmissible chromosomes lacking normal telomeric DNA nonetheless must possess functional telomeres. We conclude that Drosophila telomeres can be established and maintained by a mechanism that does not rely on the terminal DNA sequence.

Aneuploidy↗

Complexity of RNA in eggs of Drosophila melanogaster and Musca domestica.

Comparative measurements are presented of the sequence complexity of the RNA stored in the eggs of two dipteran flies, Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster. The genome of Musca is about five times the size of the Drosophila genome and contains about 3.6 times as much single-copy sequence. As shown earlier, the interspersion of repetitive and single-copy sequence is of the short-period form in Musca, and is of the long-period form in Drosophila. The egg RNA complexities were determined by hybridization of excess RNA with radioactively labeled single-copy DNA. Complexity is expressed as the length (in nucleotides) of diverse single-copy sequence represented in the RNA. The complexity of the RNA of the Musca egg is about 2.4 X 10(7) nucleotides, and that of the Drosophila egg is about 1.2 X 10(7) nucleotides. The RNA of the Musca egg is similar to or very slightly lower in complexity than that of other egg RNAs, e.g., those of Xenopus and sea urchin. Compared to all previously measured egg RNAs, Drosophila egg RNA is low in sequence complexity.

Animals↗

Rapid sequence turnover at an intergenic locus in Drosophila.

Closely related species of Drosophila tend to have similar genome sizes. The strong imbalance in favor of small deletions relative to insertions implies that the unconstrained DNA in Drosophila is unlikely to be passively inherited from even closely related ancestors, and yet most DNA in Drosophila genomes is intergenic and potentially unconstrained. In an attempt to investigate the maintenance of this intergenic DNA, we studied the evolution of an intergenic locus on the fourth chromosome of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. This 1.2-kb locus is marked by two distinct, large insertion events: a nuclear transposition of a mitochondrial sequence and a transposition of a nonautonomous DNA transposon DNAREP1_DM. Because we could trace the evolutionary histories of these sequences, we were able to reconstruct the length evolution of this region in some detail. We sequenced this locus in all four species of the D. melanogaster species complex: D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana. Although this locus is similar in size in these four species, less than 10% of the sequence from the most recent common ancestor remains in D. melanogaster and all of its sister species. This region appears to have increased in size through several distinct insertions in the ancestor of the D. melanogaster species complex and has been shrinking since the split of these lineages. In addition, we found no evidence suggesting that the size of this locus has been maintained over evolutionary time; these results are consistent with the model of a dynamic equilibrium between persistent DNA loss through small deletions and more sporadic DNA gain through less frequent but longer insertions. The apparent stability of genome size in Drosophila may belie very rapid sequence turnover at intergenic loci.

Animals↗

In vivo incorporation of Drosophila H2a histone into mammalian chromatin.

Hybrid prokaryotic/eukaryotic expression vectors have been used to introduce Drosophila histone genes into CV-1 African green monkey tissue culture cells. Transfection of CV-1 cells with Drosophila genes under the control of insect DNA promoter sequences results in low level expression of histone genes. On the other hand, when the Drosophila H2a gene is juxtaposed downstream from the long terminal repeat sequence of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) expression of the insect gene is considerably more efficient; both 3' polyadenylated insect histone messenger RNA and putative Drosophila H2a histone protein can be readily detected in the transduced cells. Using this RSV/H2a vector, we have been able to demonstrate the presence of Drosophila H2a histone in monomer nucleosome preparations isolated from transfected CV-1 cells. These results suggest the feasibility of 'remodeling' cellular chromatin in vivo in precisely defined ways. The techniques described may be generally applicable to other genes coding for chromosomal proteins.

Animals↗

Maternal inheritance of transcripts from three Drosophila src-related genes.

The Drosophila genome contains three major sequences related to the v-src gene. Previously published molecular studies have confirmed the structural homology between v-src and two of the Drosophila sequences. We have sequenced a portion of the third v-src-related Drosophila gene and found that it also shares structural homology with vertebrate and Drosophila src-family genes. RNA sequences from each of the src genes are present in pre-blastoderm embryos indicating that they are of maternal origin. As embryogenesis proceeds, the levels of each of the src RNA sequences decline. The pre-blastoderm src gene transcripts contain poly(A) and are present on polyribosomes suggesting that they are functional mRNAs. Since the Drosophila src transcripts were maternally inherited, we also investigated their distribution in adult females. The majority of the src transcripts in adult females were contained in ovaries. Only low levels of the transcripts were detected in males. These results strongly suggest that an abundant supply of src protein is required during early embryogenesis, perhaps at the time of cellularization of the blastoderm nuclei.

Animals↗

Drosophila ARSs contain the yeast ARS consensus sequence and a replication enhancer.

A number of restriction fragments that function as autonomously replicating sequences (ARSs) in yeast have been isolated from Drosophila melanogaster DNA. The behaviour in yeast of plasmids containing Drosophila ARS elements was studied and compared to that exhibited by the archetypal yeast ARS-1 plasmid. ARS functions were localised by subcloning and BAL-31 deletion analysis. These studies demonstrated the structural and functional complexity of Drosophila ARSs. Each Drosophila ARS element has at least two domains, one essential for replication (the replication sequence, RS) and a second (the replication enhancer, RE) which is essential for maximum function of the RS. The RS of three Drosophila ARSs was shown to contain a sequence identical to an 11 bp yeast ARS consensus sequence (5' A/T TTTATPuTTT A/T 3'). These observations lend support to the hypothesis that heterologous ARS elements may be of biological significance.

Animals↗

Further sequence requirements for male germ cell-specific expression under the control of the 14 bp promoter element (beta 2UE1) of the Drosophila beta 2 tubulin gene.

We have investigated a 14 bp promoter element (beta 2UE1) that is required for testis-specific expression of the Drosophila beta 2 tubulin gene. To further elucidate the role of the 14 bp element, we fused different promoter constructs to the E. coli lacZ gene and established transgenic strains with the aid of the Drosophila P-element transformation system. Germ line transformation experiments with constructs in which the element in the beta 2 tubulin gene promoter was exchanged for a related sequence from the promoter region of the Drosophila beta 3 tubulin gene led to a dramatic reduction in the expression of the lacZ gene in the testis. Exchanging the 14 bp promoter element for a similar sequence from the distal promoter of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene abolished expression. This might indicate that the sequence differences between the beta 2UE1 and the beta 2UE1-related elements reflect functional differences between these elements. Constructs in which the beta 2UE1 was fused to the hsp70 promoter revealed that testis-specific expression of a marker gene is obtained only when the element is located at the correct distance from the transcription initiation site. However, constructs in which the beta 2UE1 was inserted at about the correct position (between -41 and -54 bp) upstream of a truncated beta 3 tubulin gene promoter did not show any expression. By making beta 2-beta 3 gene promoter fusions it was found that both the region surrounding the beta 3 transcription initiation site as well as the first 116 b of beta 3 leader sequences independently reduce testis-specific expression. These findings suggest that the testis-specific expression of the Drosophila beta 2 tubulin gene underlies a unique regulatory mechanism.

Animals↗

Comparison of several promoters and polyadenylation signals for use in heterologous gene expression in cultured Drosophila cells.

We have directly compared the ability of four promoters and three polyadenylation (poly(A)) signals to direct heterologous gene expression in stably transfected Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. We compared two constitutive Drosophila promoters, the actin 5C distal promoter and the alpha 1-tubulin promoter, with the tightly regulated Drosophila metallothionein (Mtn) promoter and the Bombyx mori fibroin promoter. We find that the actin 5C and induced Mtn promoters generate comparable high levels of RNA and protein in this system. The alpha 1-tubulin promoter generates about four-fold lower levels, and the fibroin promoter shows no detectable activity in S2 cells. Interestingly, genes expressed from the constitutive actin 5C and alpha 1-tubulin promoters are consistently present at three- to four-fold lower copy numbers than genes expressed from the inducible Mtn promoter or the inactive fibroin promoter. Poly(A) signals of both mammalian (SV40) and Drosophila (Mtn) origin efficiently directed stable RNA synthesis in S2 cells, and, as in mammalian cells, the SV40 late poly(A) signal was more efficient than the SV40 early poly(A) signal. Thus the process of polyadenylation appears to be conserved between mammalian and Drosophila cells.

Actins↗

Repair of oxidative DNA damage in Drosophila melanogaster: identification and characterization of dOgg1, a second DNA glycosylase activity for 8-hydroxyguanine and formamidopyrimidines.

In Drosophila, the S3 ribosomal protein has been shown to act as a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase capable of releasing 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OH-Gua) in damaged DNA. Here we describe a second Drosophila protein (dOgg1) with 8-OH-Gua and abasic (AP) site DNA repair activities. The Drosophila OGG1 gene codes for a protein of 327 amino acids, which shows 33 and 37% identity with the yeast and human Ogg1 proteins, respectively. The DNA glycosylase activity of purified dOgg1 was investigated using gamma-irradiated DNA and gas chromatography/isotope dilution mass spectrometry (GC/IDMS). The dOgg1 protein excises 8-OH-Gua and 2, 6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyGua) from gamma-irradiated DNA. with k(ca)(t)/K:(M) values of 21.0 x 10(-5) and 11.2 x 10(-5) (min(-1) nM(-1)), respectively. Enzymatic assays using oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing a single lesion show that dOgg1 displays a marked preference for DNA duplexes containing 8-OH-Gua, 8-OH-Ade or an AP site placed opposite a cytosine. The cleavage of the 8-OH-Gua-containing strand results from the excision of the damaged base followed by a ss-elimination reaction at the 3'-side of the resulting AP site. Cleavage of 8-OH-Gua.C duplex involves the formation of a reaction intermediate that is converted into a stable covalent adduct in the presence of sodium borohydre. dOgg1 complements the mutator phenotype of fpg mutY mutants of Escherichia coli. Whole-mount in situ hybridizations on tissues at different stages of Drosophila development reveal that the dOGG1 messenger is expressed uniformly at a low level in cells in which mitotic division occurs. Therefore, Drosophila possesses two DNA glycosylase activities that can excise 8-OH-Gua and formamidopyrimidines from DNA, dOgg1 and the ribosomal protein S3.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The initiator tRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for a tRNA pseudogene.

We have isolated four segments of Drosophila melanogaster DNA that hybridize to homologous initiator tRNAMet. Three of the cloned fragments contain initiator tRNA genes, each of which can be transcribed in vitro. The fourth clone, pPW568, contains an initiator tRNA pseudogene which is not transcribed in vitro by RNA polymerase III. The pseudogene is contained in a 1.15 kb DNA fragment. This fragment has the characteristics of dispersed repetitive DNA and hybridizes in situ to at least 30 sites in the Drosophila genome. The arrangement of the initiator tRNA genes we have isolated, is different to that of other Drosophila tRNA gene families. The initiator tRNA genes are not clustered nor intermingled with other tRNA genes. They occur as single copies within an approximately 415-bp repeat segment, which is separated from other initiator tRNA genes by a mean distance of 17 kb. In situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes localizes these genes to the 61D region of the Drosophila genome. Hybridization analysis of genomic DNA indicates the presence of 8-9 non-allelic initiator tRNA genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Animals↗

Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of Drosophila, nematode, and yeast.

We conducted a detailed analysis of duplicate genes in three complete genomes: yeast, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans. For two proteins belonging to the same family we used the criteria: (1) their similarity is > or =I (I = 30% if L > or = 150 a.a. and I = 0.01n + 4.8L(-0.32(1 + exp(-L/1000))) if L < 150 a.a., where n = 6 and L is the length of the alignable region), and (2) the length of the alignable region between the two sequences is > or = 80% of the longer protein. We found it very important to delete isoforms (caused by alternative splicing), same genes with different names, and proteins derived from repetitive elements. We estimated that there were 530, 674, and 1,219 protein families in yeast, Drosophila, and C. elegans, respectively, so, as expected, yeast has the smallest number of duplicate genes. However, for the duplicate pairs with the number of substitutions per synonymous site (K(S)) < 0.01, Drosophila has only seven pairs, whereas yeast has 58 pairs and nematode has 153 pairs. After considering the possible effects of codon usage bias and gene conversion, these numbers became 6, 55, and 147, respectively. Thus, Drosophila appears to have much fewer young duplicate genes than do yeast and nematode. The larger numbers of duplicate pairs with K(S) < 0.01 in yeast and C. elegans were probably largely caused by block duplications. At any rate, it is clear that the genome of Drosophila melanogaster has undergone few gene duplications in the recent past and has much fewer gene families than C. elegans.

Animals↗

A single lineage of r2 retrotransposable elements is an active, evolutionarily stable component of the Drosophila rDNA locus.

R2 elements are non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons that insert specifically in the 28S rRNA genes of many insects. Previous reports concerning this element in the genus Drosophila have suggested that R2 elements are absent from many species of this genus, particularly those species from the subgenus Drosophila. In this report, we present an extensive study of the distribution and evolution of R2 elements in Drosophila. A PCR survey of 59 species from 23 species groups of the two major Drosophila subgenera found that R2 elements are present in all but two species of the melanogaster species subgroup. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial nucleotide sequences of R2 elements from 23 species demonstrates that the relationships of R2 elements are congruent with those of the Drosophila species phylogeny, suggesting that these elements have been vertically inherited since the divergence of this genus some 60 MYA. Sequence variation between different copies of R2 elements within each species was less than 0.16%, indicating that these elements are undergoing concerted evolution similar to that of the 28S genes. Several properties of the R2 sequences suggest that these elements depend on retrotransposition in addition to simple recombination to remain within the rDNA locus: the rates of synonymous substitutions averaged 4.8 times the rate of replacement substitutions, 82 of 83 R2 copies partially sequenced contained intact open reading frames, and, finally, length variation associated with the poly(A) 3' tails indicated that many R2 copies are the direct result of retrotransposition.

Animals↗

Long-range base pairing in Drosophila and human mRNA sequences.

The potential for long-range base pairing between the 5' and 3' ends of mRNA molecules was examined for 134 Drosophila and 204 human sequences collected from the GenBank database. Each sequence was divided into two parts, a 5' sequence taken from the start of the protein-encoding region and a 3' sequence taken from the end of the transcript. The strongest RNA pairing stem between each pair of 5' and 3' sequences was identified and scored using an alignment program modified to incorporate RNA base pairing. The observed pairing scores were then compared with a random distribution of scores generated by aligning each 5' sequence to random permutations of its corresponding 3' sequence. For both the Drosophila and the human mRNAs, the observed pairing scores were significantly biased toward the upper tail of the random distributions, with 61% of the Drosophila sequences and 64% of the human sequences falling within the upper half of the random distributions. This suggests that a pattern of long-range base pairing may be a common feature of eukaryotic mRNAs. We have also analyzed a subset of Drosophila and human mRNAs which show the greatest potential for long-range pairing. The human pairings appear to be stronger and localized to more specific regions near the ends of the mRNA sequence than those of Drosophila.

Animals↗

Nucleotide variation at the yellow gene region is not reduced in Drosophila subobscura: a study in relation to chromosomal polymorphism.

In contrast to Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, the yellow (y) gene region of Drosophila subobscura is not located in a region with a strong reduction in recombination. In addition, this gene maps very close to the breakpoints of different inversions that segregate as polymorphic in natural populations of D. subobscura. Therefore, levels of variation at the y gene region in this species relative to those found in D. melanogaster and D. simulans may be affected not only by the change in the recombinational environment, but also by the presence of inversion polymorphism. To further investigate these aspects, an approximately 5.4-kb region of the A (=X) chromosome including the y gene was sequenced in 25 lines of D. subobscura and in the closely related species Drosophila madeirensis and Drosophila guanche. The D. subobscura lines studied differed in their A-chromosomal arrangements, A(st), A(2), and A(1). Unlike in D. melanogaster and D. simulans, levels of variation at the y gene region of D. subobscura are not reduced relative to those found at other genomic regions in the same species (rp49, Acp70A, and Acph-1). This result supports the effect of the change in the recombinational environment of a particular gene on the level of neutral variation. In addition, nucleotide variation is affected by chromosomal polymorphism. A strong genetic differentiation is detected between the A(1) arrangement and either A(st) or A(2), but not between A(st) and A(2). This result is consistent with the location of the y gene relative to the breakpoints of inversions A(1) and A(2). In addition, the pattern of nucleotide polymorphism in A(st)+A(2) and A(1) seems to point out that variation at the y gene region within these chromosomal classes is in the phase transient to equilibrium. The estimated ages of these arrangements assuming a star genealogy indicate that their origin cannot predate the D. madeirensis split. Therefore, the present results are consistent with a chromosomal phylogeny where Am(1), which is an arrangement present in D. madeirensis but absent in current populations of D. subobscura, would be the ancestral arrangement.

Animals↗

Evolution of nucleotide substitutions and gene regulation in the amylase multigenes in Drosophila kikkawai and its sibling species.

In order to determine evolutionary changes in gene regulation and the nucleotide substitution pattern in a multigene family, the amylase multigenes were characterized in Drosophila kikkawai and its sibling species. The nucleotide substitution pattern was investigated. Drosophila kikkawai has four amylase genes. The Amy1 and Amy2 genes are a head-to-head duplication in the middle of the B arm of the second chromosome, while the Amy3 and Amy4 genes are a tail-to-tail duplication near the centromere of the same chromosome. In the sibling species of D. kikkawai (Drosophila bocki, Drosophila leontia, and Drosophila lini), sequencing of the Amy1, Amy2, Amy3, and Amy4 genes revealed that the Amy1 and Amy2 gene group diverged from Amy3 and Amy4 after duplication. In the Amy1 and Amy2 genes, the divergent evolution occurred in the flanking regions; in contrast, the coding regions have evolved in concerted fashion. The electrophoretic pattern of AMY isozymes was also examined. In D. kikkawai and its siblings, two or three electrophoretically different isozymes are encoded by the Amy1 and Amy2 genes (S isozyme) and by the Amy3 and Amy4 genes (F (M) isozymes). The S and F (M) isozymes show different patterns of band intensity when larvae and flies were fed in different media. Amy1 and Amy2, which encode the S isozyme, are more strikingly regulated than Amy3 and Amy4, which encode the F (M) isozyme. The GC content and codon usage bias were higher for the Amy1 and Amy2 genes than for the Amy3 and Amy4 genes. Although the ratio of synonymous and replacement substitutions within the Amy1 and Amy2 gene group was not significantly different from that within the Amy3 and Amy4 gene group, the synonymous substitution rate in the lineage of Amy1 and Amy2 was lower than that of Amy3 and Amy4. In conclusion, after the first duplication but before speciation of four species, the synonymous substitution rate between the two lineages and the electrophoretic pattern of the isozymes encoded by them changed, although we do not know whether there was any evolutionary relationship between the two.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

From fruit fly to bedside: translating lessons from Drosophila models of neurodegenerative disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fly models have been developed for a variety of neurodegenerative disorders, and the field is beginning to harness the power of Drosophila genetics to dissect pathways of disease pathogenesis and identify targets for therapeutic intervention. In this review, we emphasize the most recent accomplishments and chart the potential rewards in translating lessons from Drosophila models to clinical therapeutics. RECENT FINDINGS: The conservation of human disease genes in the Drosophila genome forms the basis for several recent investigations of the normal biological functions of genes implicated in neurodegenerative disease. In addition, transgenic approaches continue to expand the list of diseases modeled in Drosophila that now includes Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, and several spinocerebellar ataxias. Studies based on these models suggest that protein folding and degradation pathways play an important role in Parkinson's disease and the polyglutamine repeat disorders, and that kinases and apoptotic pathways may modulate neurodegeneration in tauopathies. SUMMARY: Ongoing genetic studies with Drosophila neurodegenerative disease models promise to enhance our understanding of disease pathogenesis and generate target lists for future investigational research and drug development. The next challenge will be distilling a growing number of possible targets into a shortlist for fast-track drug design and clinical trials. With the advent of neurodegenerative disease models, the fruit fly is rapidly assuming a unique niche in bench to bedside research.

Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor↗

Regulated expression at high copy number allows production of a growth-inhibitory oncogene product in Drosophila Schneider cells.

The Drosophila metallothionein promoter (Mtn) was used to obtain efficient, regulated expression of foreign gene products inserted in high copy numbers into Drosophila melanogaster Schneider 2 cells. An expression unit comprised of a reporter gene [Escherichia coli galactokinase (galK)] fused to the Mtn promoter was stably introduced into Schneider 2 cells in up to several hundred copies per cell in a single transfection-selection event. This system contrasts dramatically with other eukaryotic systems that permit only a few copies of a gene to be stably inserted in a single transfection-selection event. The transfected Drosophila S2 cell lines expressed high levels of both galK mRNA and protein in response to metal induction. Most important, and in contrast to mammalian cells, expression remained fully regulated even at high copy number, with low basal expression maintained in the absence of inducer. This regulated system was used to obtain efficient expression in Drosophila cells of an otherwise lethal or growth-inhibitory gene product, the human H-ras oncogene. The ability to obtain regulated high-level expression of potentially lethal foreign proteins is unique to the Drosophila cell system.

Animals↗

Gene discovery using computational and microarray analysis of transcription in the Drosophila melanogaster testis.

Identification and annotation of all the genes in the sequenced Drosophila genome is a work in progress. Wild-type testis function requires many genes and is thus of potentially high value for the identification of transcription units. We therefore undertook a survey of the repertoire of genes expressed in the Drosophila testis by computational and microarray analysis. We generated 3141 high-quality testis expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Testis ESTs computationally collapsed into 1560 cDNA set used for further analysis. Of those, 11% correspond to named genes, and 33% provide biological evidence for a predicted gene. A surprising 47% fail to align with existing ESTs and 16% with predicted genes in the current genome release. EST frequency and microarray expression profiles indicate that the testis mRNA population is highly complex and shows an extended range of transcript abundance. Furthermore, >80% of the genes expressed in the testis showed onefold overexpression relative to ovaries, or gonadectomized flies. Additionally, >3% showed more than threefold overexpression at p <0.05. Surprisingly, 22% of the genes most highly overexpressed in testis match Drosophila genomic sequence, but not predicted genes. These data strongly support the idea that sequencing additional cDNA libraries from defined tissues, such as testis, will be important tools for refined annotation of the Drosophila genome. Additionally, these data suggest that the number of genes in Drosophila will significantly exceed the conservative estimate of 13,601.

Animals↗