Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Base editing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

The influence of the DNA polymerase gamma accessory subunit on base excision repair by the catalytic subunit.

Mammalian DNA polymerase gamma, the sole polymerase responsible for replication and repair of mitochondrial DNA, contains a large catalytic subunit and a smaller accessory subunit, pol gammaB. In addition to the polymerase domain, the large subunit contains a 3'-5' editing exonuclease domain as well as a dRP lyase activity that can remove a 5'-deoxyribosephosphate (dRP) group during base excision repair. We show that the accessory subunit enhances the ability of the catalytic subunit to function in base excision repair mainly by stimulating two subreactions in the repair process. Pol gammaB appeared to specifically enhance the rate at which pol gamma was able to locate damage in high molecular weight DNA. One pol gammaB point mutant known to have impaired ability to bind duplex DNA stimulated repair poorly, suggesting that duplex DNA binding through pol gammaB may help the catalytic subunit locate sites of DNA damage. In addition, the small subunit significantly stimulated the dRP lyase activity of pol gammaA, although it did not increase the rate at which the dRP group dissociated from the enzyme. The ability of DNA pol gamma to process a high load of damaged DNA may be compromised by the slow release of the dRP group.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

RNA determinants for translational editing. Mischarging a minihelix substrate by a tRNA synthetase.

The fidelity of protein synthesis requires efficient discrimination of amino acid substrates by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Accurate discrimination of the structurally similar amino acids, valine and isoleucine, by isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) results, in part, from a hydrolytic editing reaction, which prevents misactivated valine from being stably joined to tRNAIle. The editing reaction is dependent on the presence of tRNAIle, which contains discrete D-loop nucleotides that are necessary to promote editing of misactivated valine. RNA minihelices comprised of just the acceptor-TPsiC helix of tRNAIle are substrates for specific aminoacylation by IleRS. These substrates lack the aforementioned D-loop nucleotides. Because minihelices contain determinants for aminoacylation, we thought that they might also play a role in editing that has not previously been recognized. Here we show that, in contrast to tRNAIle, minihelixIle is unable to trigger the hydrolysis of misactivated valine and, in fact, is mischarged with valine. In addition, mutations in minihelixIle that enhance or suppress charging with isoleucine do the same with valine. Thus, minihelixIle contains signals for charging (by IleRS) that are independent of the amino acid and, by itself, minihelixIle provides no determinants for editing. An RNA hairpin that mimics the D-stem/loop of tRNAIle is also unable to induce the hydrolysis of misactivated valine, both by itself and in combination with minihelixIle. Thus, the native tertiary fold of tRNAIle is required to promote efficient editing. Considering that the minihelix is thought to be the more ancestral part of the tRNA structure, these results are consistent with the idea that, during the development of the genetic code, RNA determinants for editing were added after the establishment of an aminoacylation system.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Native mRNA editing complexes from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria.

The aim of this study was to identify multicomponent complexes involved in kinetoplastid mitochondrial mRNA editing. Mitochondrial extracts from Trypanosoma brucei were fractionated on 10-30% glycerol gradients and assayed for RNAs and activities potentially involved in editing, including pre-edited mRNA, guide RNA (gRNA), endonuclease, terminal uridylyltransferase (TUTase), RNA ligase and gRNA-mRNA chimera-forming activities. These experiments suggest that two distinct editing complexes exist. Complex I (19S) consists of gRNA, TUTase, RNA ligase and chimera-forming activity. Complex II (35-40S) is composed of gRNA, preedited mRNA, RNA ligase and chimera-forming activity. These studies provide the first evidence that editing occurs in a multicomponent complex. The possible roles of complex I, complex II and RNA ligase in editing are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Replicating hepatitis delta virus RNA is edited in the nucleus by the small form of ADAR1.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) uses a host-encoded RNA-editing activity to express its two essential proteins from the same coding sequence. Adenosine deaminase that acts on RNA (ADAR)1 and ADAR2 are enzymes that catalyze such reactions, and each, when overexpressed, are capable of editing HDV RNA in vivo. However, the enzyme responsible for editing HDV RNA during replication has not been determined. Mammalian cells express two forms of ADAR1, a large form (ADAR1-L) that mainly localizes to the cytoplasm and a small form (ADAR1-S) that resides in the nucleus. Recently, we found that the specific activity of ADAR1-L within cells is much higher than that of ADAR1-S but only when the substrate can be edited in the cytoplasm. Here we observed that although both ADAR1-S and ADAR1-L were expressed throughout HDV replication, no ADAR2 could be observed at any time. Using expression vectors that individually overexpress either form of ADAR1, we found that ADAR1-S could stimulate editing during replication more efficiently. We next reduced ADAR1 levels during HDV replication. After transfection of an ADAR1-L-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA), we observed a significant loss of that protein and its associated cytoplasmic editing activity while the level of ADAR1-S remained unchanged. Transfection of this siRNA, however, did not reduce editing during HDV replication. In contrast, transfection of an siRNA that targets both forms of ADAR1 greatly reduced the expression of both proteins and potently inhibited editing during replication. We conclude that ADAR1-S edits HDV RNA during replication and that editing occurs in the nucleus.

Adenosine Deaminase↗
PubMed2001

RNA editing of the ribosomal protein S13 transcripts in magnolia and sunflower mitochondria.

To obtain information on ribosomal protein gene content and RNA editing in plant mitochondria, we investigated the conservation of the gene for ribosomal protein S13 (rps13) in the mitochondrial genomes of Magnolia spp. and Helianthus annuus. A complete rps13 open reading frame was identified in the mitochondrial genome of Magnolia and Helianthus. Comparison of genomic and cDNA sequences revealed that transcripts from the mitochondrial rps13 locus in both Magnolia and Helianthus undergo RNA editing suggesting the functionality of the related gene. Six and four editing events in the rps13 transcript population of Magnolia and Helianthus mitochondria, respectively, cause critical changes of codons and, consequently, induce 5 and 3.4% amino acid modifications in the respective genomically-encoded S13 polypeptides. Both editing pattern and efficiency of RNA editing differ in the reverse transcription (RT)-PCR-derived cDNA populations from the rps13 locus from the analyzed plant species with only the Magnolia rps13 being fully edited.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Editing corrects mispairing in the acceptor stem of bean and potato mitochondrial phenylalanine transfer RNAs.

Editing is a general event in plant mitochondrial messenger RNAs, but has never been detected in a plant mitochondrial transfer RNA (tRNA). We demonstrate here the occurrence of a tRNA editing event in higher plant mitochondria: in both bean and potato, the C encoded at position 4 in the mitochondrial tRNA(Phe)(GAA) gene is converted into a U in the mature tRNA. This nucleotide change corrects the mismatched C4-A69 base-pair which appears when folding the gene sequence into the cloverleaf structure and it is consistent with the fact that C to U transitions constitute the common editing events affecting plant mitochondrial messenger RNAs. The tRNA(Phe)(GAA) gene is located upstream of the single copy tRNA(Pro)(UGG) gene in both the potato and the bean mitochondrial DNAs. The sequences of potato and bean tRNA(Pro)(UGG) genes are colinear with the sequence of the mature bean mitochondrial tRNA(Pro)(UGG), demonstrating that this tRNA is not edited. A single copy tRNA(Ser)(GCU) gene was found upstream of the tRNA(Phe) gene in the potato mitochondrial DNA. A U6-U67 mismatched base-pair appears in the cloverleaf folding of this gene and is maintained in the mature potato mitochondrial tRNA(Ser)(GCU), which argues in favour of the hypothesis that the editing system of plant mitochondria can only perform C to U or occasionally U to C changes.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1999

The ATPase subunit 6 gene sequence predicts that RNA editing is conserved between lizard- and human-infecting Leishmania.

Here we investigate the similarities in the kinetoplastid RNA editing process between human- and lizard-infecting Leishmania species. We present the sequence of the maxicircle-encoded ATPase subunit 6 gene from L. (V.) panamensis, L. (L.) mexicana and L. (L.) donovani species of human-infecting Leishmania. These represent the first available sequences of this gene from Leishmania species other than the lizard-infecting L. tarentolae. The gene sequences are highly conserved, both over the edited and unedited parts of the gene, implying that the RNA editing process is likely to be highly conserved between Leishmania species. Indeed, the first editing domain is absolutely conserved in all three Leishmania species studied and L. tarentolae. A phylogeny based on part of the ATPase subunit 6 gene placed the lizard-infecting Leishmania within the monophyletic Leishmania genus, supporting previous data which suggest that lizard- and human-infecting Leishmania species are closely related.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1996

A single editing event is a prerequisite for efficient processing of potato mitochondrial phenylalanine tRNA.

In bean, potato, and Oenothera plants, the C encoded at position 4 (C4) in the mitochondrial tRNA Phe GAA gene is converted into a U in the mature tRNA. This nucleotide change corrects a mismatched C4-A69 base pair which appears when the gene sequence is folded into the cloverleaf structure. C-to-U conversions constitute the most common editing events occurring in plant mitochondrial mRNAs. While most of these conversions introduce changes in the amino acids specified by the mRNA and appear to be essential for the synthesis of functional proteins in plant mitochondria, the putative role of mitochondrial tRNA editing has not yet been defined. Since the edited form of the tRNA has the correct secondary and tertiary structures compared with the nonedited form, the two main processes which might be affected by a nucleotide conversion are aminoacylation and maturation. To test these possibilities, we determined the aminoacylation properties of unedited and edited potato mitochondrial tRNAPhe in vitro transcripts, as well as the processing efficiency of in vitro-synthesized potato mitochondrial tRNAPhe precursors. Reverse transcription-PCR amplification of natural precursors followed by cDNA sequencing was also used to investigate the influence of editing on processing. Our results show that C-to-U conversion at position 4 in the potato mitochondrial tRNA Phe GAA is not required for aminoacylation with phenylalanine but is likely to he essential for efficient processing of this tRNA.

Base Composition↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Estimating the prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adults from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Survey.

The National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Survey is a comprehensive, community-based survey of mental disorders and use of services by adults, ages 18 and older. Diagnoses are based on the criteria in the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders," third edition, and were obtained in five communities in the United States through lay-interviewer administration of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Results from the survey provide the public health field with data on the prevalence and incidence of specific mental disorders in the community, unbiased by the treatment status of the sample. The population with disorders is estimated, and the survey findings that respond to some of the most common requests for information about the epidemiology of mental disorders in the United States are highlighted briefly. Based on the survey, it is estimated that one of every five persons in the United States suffers from a mental disorder in any 6-month period, and that one of every three persons suffers a disorder in his or her lifetime. Fewer than 20 percent of those with a recent mental disorder seek help for their problem, according to the survey. High rates of comorbid substance abuse and mental disorders were found, particularly among those who had sought treatment for their disorders.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed1993

RNA editing of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit 9.

The barley (Hordeum vulgare) FO-ATP synthase subunit 9 (atp9) was isolated from the mitochondrial DNA. Two copies of atp9 are present in barley mitochondria and 2 major transcripts of 2.7 kb and 1.2 kb were detected on RNA blots. RNA editing as C-to-U conversion occurs in barley atp9 in seven positions. Five of these seven positions lead to an amino acid change whereas two conversions are silent. The editing positions of barley were found to be identical to those of wheat. Whereas in wheat, Oenothera and Petunia all the atp9 transcripts were fully edited, 24% of the barley cDNA clones were partially edited as compared to 10% partially edited clones in wheat.

Arabidopsis Proteins↗
PubMed1999

In vitro uridine insertion RNA editing mediated by cis-acting guide RNAs.

Uridine (U) insertion/deletion editing of mitochondrial mRNAs in kinetoplastid protozoa is a posttranscriptional process mediated by guide RNAs (gRNAs). The gRNAs direct the precise insertion and deletion of Us by a cleavage-ligation mechanism involving base pairing. We show that a cognate gRNA in cis at the 3' end of a preedited NADH dehydrogenase 7 (ND7) mRNA substrate can direct U insertions at editing site 1 when incubated with a mitochondrial lysate from Leishmania tarentolae. The efficiency of gRNA-dependent U insertion mediated by a cis-acting gRNA is greater on a molar basis than that for a trans-acting gRNA, as expected for a unimolecular gRNA:mRNA interaction. Blocking the 3' end of a cis-acting gRNA lacking a 3' oligo[U] tail has no effect on gRNA-dependent U insertions, nor does providing the gRNA in cis upstream of the mRNA, confirming the previous observation that the terminal 2'- and 3'-hydroxyls of the gRNA are not involved in U insertion activity. These results also establish that the oligo[U] tail is not required for U insertion in vitro. Increasing the extent of base pairing between the 3' end of the gRNA and the 5' end of the mRNA significantly increases in vitro gRNA-dependent U insertion at site 1, presumably by maintaining the mRNA 5' cleavage fragment within the editing complex. We speculate that, in vivo, protein:RNA and/or protein:protein interactions may be responsible for maintaining the mRNA 5' cleavage fragment in close proximity to the mRNA 3' cleavage fragment, and that such interactions may be rate limiting in vitro.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

RNA aptamers binding the double-stranded RNA-binding domain.

Specific RNA recognition of proteins containing the double-strand RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) is essential for several biological pathways such as ADAR-mediated adenosine deamination, localization of RNAs by Staufen, or RNA cleavage by RNAse III. Structural analysis has demonstrated the lack of base-specific interactions of dsRBDs with either a perfect RNA duplex or an RNA hairpin. We therefore asked whether in vitro selections performed in parallel with individual dsRBDs could yield RNAs that are specifically recognized by the dsRBD on which they were selected . To this end, SELEX experiments were performed using either the second dsRBD of the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 or the second dsRBD of Xlrbpa, a homolog of TRBP that is involved in RISC formation. Several RNA families with high binding capacities for dsRBDs were isolated from either SELEX experiment, but no discrimination of these RNAs by different dsRBDs could be detected. The selected RNAs are highly structured, and binding regions map to two neighboring stem-loops that presumably form stacked helices and are interrupted by mismatches and bulges. Despite the lack of selective binding of SELEX RNAs to individual dsRBDS, selected RNAs can efficiently interfere with RNA editing in vivo.

Adenosine Deaminase↗
PubMed1990

Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing. Validation of a sensitive assay and developmental biology of RNA editing in the rat.

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) 48 mRNA is the product of a C----U conversion of the first base of the codon CAA for Gln-2153 in apoB-100 mRNA, changing it to an in-frame stop codon (UAA). Methods for measuring the ratio of apoB-48 to apoB-100 mRNA that have been authenticated with standard mixtures of the two apoB mRNA species have not been described. Using RNA mixtures consisting of known proportions of in vitro transcripts of apoB-100 and apoB-48, we directly compared four different assays. We found that a procedure based on the polymerase chain reaction, cDNA cloning, and oligonucleotide colony hybridization was the most sensitive and accurate assay. Total RNAs isolated from adult rat small intestine, adult liver, Day 15 and term placentas, and term fetal membranes were found to contain apoB mRNA in the following relative amounts: 100, 59.8, 0.9, 6.96, and 1087, respectively. They all contained both apoB-48 and apoB-100 mRNAs, with the former constituting 95.8, 59.2, 4.6, 1.3, and 0.8%, respectively, of the apoB mRNA. We examined the ontogeny of apoB-48 mRNA biogenesis in the liver and intestine in the rat prenatally on Days 17, 19, and 20 of gestation, and postnatally on Days 1, 3, 7, 13, 20, 24, and 37 after birth. Slot-blot hybridization demonstrated that apoB mRNA showed a peak at birth (Days 1-3 in the liver and Days 1-7 in the small intestine) and then decreased on Days 7 (in the liver) and 13 (in the intestine) before it increased again on Day 20 toward the adult level. Quantitation of the ratio of apoB-48 to apoB-100 mRNA at the different time points showed that RNA editing became highly competent prenatally on Day 19 of gestation in the small intestine, but postnatally on Day 24 after birth in the liver. The asynchronous nature for this developmentally regulated process in the liver and small intestine of the rat has implications for the mechanism of RNA editing and lipid homeostasis in this animal.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1993

RNA editing: exploring one mode with apolipoprotein B mRNA.

RNA editing is a newly described genetic phenomenon. It encompasses widely different molecular mechanisms and events. According to the specific RNA modification, RNA editing can be broadly classified into six major types. Type II RNA editing occurs in plants and mammals; it consists predominantly in cytidine to uridine conversions resulting from deamination/transamination or transglycosylation, although in plants other mechanisms have not been excluded. Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing is the only well-documented editing phenomenon in mammals. It is an intranuclear event that occurs posttranscriptionally, coincident with splicing and polyadenylation. Recent observations indicate that the tissue- and sequence-specific process is mediated by an enzyme that has separate domains for editing and sequence recognition. The presence of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing activity in tissues that do not produce the protein suggests that other RNAs may be edited and RNA editing may be a genetic phenomenon of general biological importance to the cell.

APOBEC-1 Deaminase↗
PubMed1993

Insertional editing in mitochondria of Physarum.

RNA produced from a number of genes on the mitochondrial (mt) DNA of Physarum polycephalum have nucleotides inserted at specific sites in their sequence. These insertions are spaced at approximately 25 nucleotide intervals and create open reading frames in mRNA and functional structure in tRNAs and rRNAs. Although most of the insertions at a site are single cytidines; single uridines and certain dinucleotides containing adenosine and guanosine as well as cytidine and uridine are also occasionally inserted at certain sites. This mixed nucleotide insertional RNA editing is unique among currently characterized editing systems.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

RNA editing of a chimeric maize mitochondrial gene transcript is sequence specific.

RNA editing was analysed in the mitochondrial ATPase complex subunit 6 gene (atp6) transcripts of the C male-sterile cytoplasm (cms-C) of maize. The only copy of atp6 in cms-C, designated C-atp6, is a triple gene fusion product comprised of DNA sequences derived from atp9, atp6, and an unknown origin. Sequences of cDNAs revealed 19 C to U alterations resulting in 16 amino acid residue changes compared to the genomic sequence. The only C to U edit in the 39-nucleotide sequence similar to atp9 was comparable to a change in the complete atp9 mRNAs of Petunia, Oenothera, wheat, and sorghum. The 442 nucleotides of unknown origin were not edited. The 18 editing events within the atp6 homologous region were similar to those in the atp6 transcripts of sorghum. RNA editing in maize C-atp6 transcripts introduces a translational stop codon at the same position where it is created by editing in sorghum and Oenothera atp6 mRNAs and is already present in atp6 open reading frames of most other plant and non-plant organisms. Our results, along with other reports on editing in chimeric transcripts, indicate that RNA editing is not influenced by rearrangements but instead is sequence specific.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2025

Cardiac hypertrophy at the crossroads: Mechanistic insights and emerging multimodal therapeutic strategies.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 17.9 million deaths annually. Among their diverse manifestations, cardiac hypertrophy is a clinically significant condition that predisposes patients to heart failure, arrhythmias, and and sudden cardiac death. Clinically, hypertrophy can be classified into three forms: physiological (adaptive) hypertrophy, which supports cardiac performance and is reversible, pathological hypertrophy most often secondary to hypertension, valvular disease, hemodynamic stress, or sustained neurohumoral activation; and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) represents a primary genetic disorder, most often caused by mutations in sarcomeric proteins. These distinct etiologies have important therapeutic implications, as they determine how efficiently pharmacological agents can target underlying mechanisms. Conventional pharmacological treatments are widely used in clinical practice, yet they provide limited reversal of established remodeling. This therapeutic gap has driven the development of innovative modalities such as RNA-based therapeutics, exosome-mediated interventions, stem cell-derived therapies, and genome-editing technologies, which aim to modulate maladaptive signaling and restore myocardial integrity. This review integrates clinical perspectives with mechanistic insights, delineating the drivers of pathological hypertrophy while evaluating both established therapies and emerging strategies that hold promise for precision cardiology and improved patient outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases generates RNA and protein diversity.

RNA editing is defined as a post-transcriptional change of a gene-encoded sequence at the RNA level, excluding alterations due to processes such as pre-mRNA splicing and 3'-end formation. RNA editing is found in many organisms and can occur either by the insertion or deletion of nucleotides or by the substitution of bases by modification. The nucleoside inosine (I) was first detected in cytoplasmic tRNA and was later found in messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) and in viral transcripts. It is formed by hydrolytic deamination of a genomically encoded adenosine (A) at C6 of the base and this reaction is catalysed by a family of related enzymes. ADARs (for adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) catalyse A to I conversion either promiscuously or site-specifically in pre-mRNAs, viral RNAs and synthetic double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), whereas ADATs (for adenosine deaminases acting on tRNA) are involved in inosine formation in tRNAs. ADAT1 generates I at position 37 (3' of the anticodon) in eukaryotic tRNA(Ala). ADAT2 and ADAT3 function as a heterodimer which catalyses inosine formation at the wobble position (position 34) in eukaryotic tRNAs. Here, we review the state of knowledge on ADARs and ADATs and their RNA substrates, with an emphasis on the developments over the past few years that have increased the understanding of the mechanism of action of these enzymes and of the functional consequences of the widespread modification they catalyse.

Adenosine↗