SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Recovery Room”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Comparison of diclofenac and tenoxicam for postoperative analgesia with and without fentanyl in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy or tonsillectomy.

127 children scheduled for elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with a volatile agent. At induction the child received either rectal diclofenac 1 mg.kg-1 with or without fentanyl 0.75 microgram.kg-1 i.v., or intravenous tenoxicam 0.4 mg.kg-1 with or without fentanyl 0.75 microgram.kg-1 i.v. Blood loss was measured peroperatively. Nausea and vomiting scores, sedation scores and pain scores were recorded in the recovery room, at one, two, four and eight h postoperatively and at discharge. There were no significant differences in blood loss between the groups or between nausea and vomiting scores. Pain scores in the tenoxicam without fentanyl group were significantly higher in recovery (P < 0.05) than the diclofenac group without fentanyl and both fentanyl groups. This group required supplemental analgesia earlier although this was not significant. The pain scores in the diclofenac with fentanyl group were significantly lower at one h and four h than the group receiving diclofenac alone (P = 0.008 and 0.02 respectively).

Adenoidectomy↗

PubMed1998

Effects of premedication on dose requirements for propofol: comparison of clonidine and hydroxyzine.

The influence of a single dose of clonidine (5 micrograms kg-1) or hydroxyzine (1 mg kg-1) on intraoperative propofol requirements was determined in 28 male patients (ASA I) undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either clonidine or hydroxyzine orally 2 h before induction of anaesthesia. After a loading dose of propofol (2.5 mg kg-1), mivacurium (0.2 mg kg-1) and alfentanil (15 micrograms kg-1), anaesthesia was maintained with a standardized propofol infusion supplemented with nitrous oxide (66%) in oxygen. During surgery, additional propofol boluses (1 mg kg-1) were administered when heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased by more than 10% compared with preinduction values. The clonidine group demonstrated a 14.5% decrease in total propofol requirements (P < 0.05) and a 52.2% reduction in additional propofol boluses (P < 0.02) in comparison with the hydroxyzine group. intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in the clonidine group but no patients needed treatment with ephedrine for hypotension or bradycardia. Recovery of psychomotor function and discharge from the recovery room were not delayed in the clonidine group. This study indicates that 5 micrograms kg-1 clonidine given as premedication in ASA I patients reduces intraoperative propofol requirements in comparison with 1 mg kg-1 hydroxyzine without inducing adverse effects on recovery or haemodynamic stability.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Balanced anestesia versus total intravenous anestesia for kidney transplantation.

AIM: An ideal anesthetic regimen for kidney transplantation should be able to assure haemodynamic stability to obtain an optimal graft reperfusion. The aim of this study was to compare 2 regimens of anesthesia for patients submitted to kidney transplantation. METHODS: We studied 40 patients: 20 subjects (Group A) received balanced anesthesia with thiopental, fentanyl and isoflurane, to the others 20 (Group B), a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanyl was given. In both groups muscle relaxation was obtained with a bolus of cisatracurium followed by a continuous infusion. We performed standard clinical, invasive blood pressure and central venous pressure monitoring. Hemodyna-mic data have been collected at standard times. During the postoperative period we evaluated the recovery (Aldrete Score) in the recovery room and the analgesia (VAS) at 1, 6, 24 h after the end of surgery. RESULTS: The trend of hemodynamic parameters did not show statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. We observed statistically significant differences concerning the quality of the recovery and the postoperative analgesia. The recovery in group B was faster than in group A, but in group A the pain control was better than in group B at least during the first postoperative hour. CONCLUSIONS: For their pharmacokinetic properties, propofol, remifentanyl and cisatracurium allow to obtain a good control of the hemodynamic parameters and a fast and safe recovery of consciousness. Total intravenous anesthesia regimen seems to be an alternative to the balanced anesthesia for patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Remifentanil with morphine transitional analgesia shortens neurological recovery compared to fentanyl for supratentorial craniotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the recovery profiles, efficacy and safety of remifentanil and morphine for transitional analgesia with fentanyl in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial mass lesions. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, multicentre study. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and remifentanil (1.0 micro g x kg(-1) bolus and a 1 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion) or fentanyl (1 micro g x kg(-1) bolus and a 1.0 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion). The opioid infusion continued until the level of anesthesia was deemed appropriate for intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with N(2)O/O(2), isoflurane 0.5 MAC and remifentanil 0.2 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) or fentanyl 0.04 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1). At bone flap replacement, either morphine 0.08 mg x kg(-1) (remifentanil group) or saline (fentanyl group) was given. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was greater in those receiving fentanyl during induction (145.6 +/-17.5 mmHg vs 128.8 +/-18.3 mmHg; P = 0.006) and intubation (126.9 +/-17.1 vs 110.9 +/-16.5 mmHg; P < 0.001). Median time to tracheal extubation was similar but less variable in the remifentanil group (remifentanil = 8 min: range = 2-44 min; fentanyl = 8 min: range = 1-732 min). The fentanyl patients required a longer time to achieve the first normal neurological score (fentanyl = 38.0 min; remifentanil = 26.0 min; P = 0.035). Both the anesthesiologists and the recovery room nurses rated remifentanil better with respect to level of consciousness. Analgesics were required earlier in patients receiving remifentanil; median time 0.5 vs 1.08 hr, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil is a suitable alternative to fentanyl in supratentorial craniotomy. Time to preoperative neurological recovery is faster and morphine provides some transitional analgesia without compromising the quality of recovery.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Effect of auditory evoked potential index monitoring on anesthetic drug requirements and recovery profile after laparoscopic surgery: a clinical utility study.

BACKGROUND: The auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitor provides an electroencephalogram-derived index (AAI) that has been reported to correlate with the central nervous system depressant effects of anesthetic drugs. This clinical utility study was designed to test the hypothesis that AAI-guided administration of the maintenance anesthetics and analgesics would improve their titration and thereby provide a faster recovery from general anesthesia. METHODS: Seventy consenting patients undergoing elective general surgery procedures were randomly assigned to either a control (standard clinical practice) or AEP-monitored group. Although the AEP monitor was connected to all patients, the information from the monitor was only made available to the anesthesiologists assigned to patients in the AEP-monitored group. In the AEP-monitored group, the inspired desflurane concentration was titrated to maintain an AAI value of 15-20. In the control group, the inspired desflurane concentration was varied based on standard clinical signs. The AAI values and hemodynamic variables, as well as end-tidal desflurane concentrations, were recorded at 3- to 5-min intervals. The recovery times to achieve a White fast-track score greater than 12 and an Aldrete score of 10, as well as the actual duration of the PACU stay, were evaluated at 5- to 10-min intervals. Patient satisfaction with recovery from anesthesia was assessed using a 100-point verbal rating scale at 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: The average intraoperative AAI value in the AEP-monitored group was significantly higher than in the control group (16 +/- 5 vs. 11 +/- 8, P < 0.05). Use of the AEP monitor reduced the desflurane requirement by 26% compared to the control group (P < 0.01). In addition, the AEP-monitored group received less intraoperative fentanyl (270 +/- 120 vs. 390 +/- 203 microg, P < 0.05) and more rapidly achieved fast-track eligibility (29 +/- 19 vs. 56 +/- 41 min, P < 0.05). The time required to achieve an Aldrete score of 10 (60 +/- 31 vs. 98 +/- 55 min) and the duration of stay in the recovery room (78 +/- 32 vs. 106 +/- 54 min) were also significantly reduced in the AEP-monitored (vs. control) group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of AEP monitoring as an adjunct to standard clinical monitors improved titration of anesthetic drugs, thereby facilitating the early recovery process after laparoscopic surgery.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Self-assessment of the cephalad analgesia level after spinal or epidural anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of self-assessment of the cephalad analgesia level after spinal or epidural anesthesia using skin pinch. METHODS: The assessment of the cephalad analgesia level of anesthetic block made using self-assessment was compared to that of the pinprick method with a short bevel needle in 40 patients who received spinal or epidural anesthesia. RESULTS: A good correlation was found between the assessments of the cephalad analgesia level of anesthetic block made using pinprick and self-assessment (spinal anesthesia group: r = 0.883, p less than 0.0001; epidural anesthesia group: r = 0.802, p less than 0.0001). Among 14 patients who had received sedatives and analgesics intravenously during surgery, a good correlation was found between the assessments of analgesia level made using the two methods in the spinal group (r = 0.921, p less than 0.0001); the corresponding correlation was poor in the epidural group (r = 0.617, p less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Self-assessment seems to be a method useful for testing recovery from spinal and epidural anesthesia in the recovery room and in the surgical ward, although it may be unreliable when used by patients who have been sedated.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

[Plasma catecholamine levels in patients during surgical removal of pheochromocytoma under sevoflurane anesthesia].

We measured plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics in 5 patients during surgical removal of pheochromocytoma under sevoflurane anesthesia. Plasma catecholamine levels were unchanged with sevoflurane anesthesia. Plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine levels increased 149 folds, 7.8 folds and 2.9 folds respectively as compared with preanesthetic values during surgical manipulation of the tumor, and then declined in magnitude but still remained 15 folds, 2.7 folds and 1.8 folds higher respectively as compared with the preanesthetic levels after removal of the tumor. These catecholamine levels finally reached 180%, 20% and 60% of the preanesthetic values respectively after the emergence from anesthesia in the recovery room. Mean systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures were 127/82 mmHg before anesthetic induction and increased to 211/71 mmHg during manipulation of the tumor. Then they decreased to 75/52 mmHg immediately after removal of the tumor but recovered up to 126/71 mmHg on recovery from anesthesia. Alpha and beta adrenal blockers were administered if necessary to control hypertension and tachycardia during manipulation of the tumor. Hypotension after removal of the tumor was treated with volume replacement, vasopressor and/or catecholamines. No correlation was found between plasma catecholamine levels and arterial blood pressure in our study except during manipulation of the tumor. No arrhythmias were observed during anesthesia and surgery in our cases even though plasma catecholamines increased extremely with surgical intervention. We conclude that sevoflurane anesthesia is a better choice for surgery for pheochromocytoma.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

Anaesthesia with desflurane-nitrous oxide in elderly patients. Comparison with isoflurane-nitrous oxide.

BACKGROUND: Desflurane is a new volatile anaesthetic, very little soluble. We wished to compare efficacy, safety, and emergence and recovers; profiles of desflurane-N2O versus isoflurane-N2O anaesthesia in elderly patients. METHODS EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: single blind, prospective randomised study. SETTING: operating rooms of two major teaching hospitals affiliated with the University of Milan. PATIENTS: fifty-seven patients ASA physical status II or III, aged 65 or older, undergoing urological (non-endoscopic), orthopaedic or gynaecological (non-laparoscopic) surgery of at least one hour duration, were randomly assigned to receive general anaesthesia with either desflurane or isoflurane in 60% N2O- 40% O2, after standardised premedication and induction. MEASUREMENTS: vital signs, end-tidal agent, narcotic requirement, and adverse event appearance were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received desflurane and 29 isoflurane. Demographics, anaesthesia duration and exposure, and intraoperative fentanyl requirement were comparable in the two groups. Immediate emergence from anaesthesia (time to extubation and hand grip on command) was faster in desflurane group, albeit not significantly (8.4 +/- 6.4 vs 11.0 +/- 6.5 min and 8.6 +/- 6.0 vs 11.8 +/- 6.0); on the contrary, early recovery (time to state the name and date of birth) was significantly shorter in patients receiving desflurane (11.1 +/- 6.2 vs 17.3 +/- 7.8 min and 13.1 +/- 6.0 vs 20.9 +/- 10.9 min). Only 24 patients (12 in desflurane and 12 in isoflurane group) did need postoperative fentanyl administration; among them, requirement was significantly higher in desflurane patients (3.4 +/- 1.1 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3 micrograms.kg-1. Total time in recovery room was not different between anaesthetics, as well as adverse event prevalence and severity. CONCLUSIONS: Early recovery in elderly patients is faster after desflurane than isoflurane anaesthesia; this might contribute to increased requirement of postoperative analgesia. Occurrence of adverse event is comparable between the two anaesthetics.

Aged↗

PubMed1992

Measuring recovery from general anaesthesia using critical flicker frequency: a comparison of two methods.

Critical flicker frequency (CFF) is the frequency at which a flickering light appears steady. It is a sensitive measure for assessing recovery from anaesthesia. The CFF is almost always determined with the method of limits by which the flickering frequency is progressively decreased (or increased) until the patient reports a change from fusion to flicker (or flicker to fusion). This method has two disadvantages: it is influenced by the response bias (i.e., the subjective criterion used by the subject to decide that flicker is present or absent) and by the response delay (i.e., the interval between the perceptual change and the response). To avoid these problems, the method of forced choice is recommended. For each trial, the subject observes the light during two short successive periods. The light flickers during only one period, according to chance. The patient must indicate the period during which flickers occur. If uncertain, the patient has to make a guess. The aim of this study was to compare the two methods for assessing recovery from general anaesthesia. Two induction agents were used to obtain different recovery profiles. Twenty patients undergoing uncomplicated surgery lasting less than two hours were tested. They received either thiopentone or midazolam for induction, according to a randomized design. Vecuronium was used to facilitate tracheal intubation and anaesthesia was maintained with fentanyl, isoflurane and nitrous oxide. The CFF was measured before induction and at 60, 120 and 180 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. The person measuring CFF was unaware of the induction agent used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Prospective evaluation of anesthetic technique for anorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Deep intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia for anorectal surgery in the prone position is used frequently at our institution, but is not widely accepted because of concerns regarding airway management. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of this anesthetic technique for anorectal surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 413 consecutive patients (mean age, 47 years; mean weight, 80 kg) undergoing anorectal surgical procedures. RESULTS: Of the 389 patients who underwent anorectal procedures in the prone position, 260 (67 percent) received intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia, 125 (32 percent) received regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural), and 4 (1 percent) received general endotracheal anesthesia. Of the 24 patients who underwent anorectal procedures in the lithotomy position, 13 (54 percent) received intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia, 2 (8 percent) received regional anesthesia, 2 (8 percent) received general endotracheal anesthesia, and 7 (29 percent) received mask inhalational anesthesia. Forty-two adverse events attributable to the anesthetic occurred in 18 patients: nausea and vomiting (n = 17), transient hypotension, bradycardia, or arrhythmia (n = 8), transient hypoxia or hypoventilation (n = 7), urinary retention (n = 6), and severe patient discomfort (n = 2). These complications occurred in 4 percent (10/273) of patients receiving intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia and in 6 percent (8/127) of patients receiving regional anesthesia. Two of 260 patients (0.8 percent) receiving intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia in the prone position were rolled supine before completing the surgical procedure. Recovery time before discharge for patients treated on an ambulatory basis was significantly shorter for those patients undergoing intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia (79 +/- 34 minutes, n = 174) than for patients undergoing regional anesthesia (161 +/- 63 minutes, n = 45; P < 0.001, t-test). CONCLUSION: Intravenous sedation plus local anesthesia in the prone position is safe and effective for anorectal surgery and offers potential cost savings by decreasing recovery room time for outpatient procedures.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

A method for assessment of standards of care of anesthesia services in departments with different levels of resources.

In developing countries the standards of anesthesia care vary greatly between hospitals. In order to identify the urgent needs of disadvantaged hospitals, we compared three index hospitals in the greater Cairo area, one of which has excellent (category I), on intermediate (category II), and one with severely restricted resources (category III). Standards of care published by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) were used to develop a spreadsheet for documenting features of pre-, intra- and post-anesthetic care in patients undergoing tonsillectomies, a procedure commonly performed in all three hospitals. The spreadsheet enabled us to document all equipment, supplies and personnel engaged from pre-anesthetic evaluation to discharge. Analysis of the data revealed that the service provided by the category I hospital approached the ASA standards. In the category II hospital the patients did not go through a pre-anesthetic evaluation; instead they were seen for the first time in the operating room. No premedication was given. Intravenous access was established with the help of a needle (rather than a catheter). Monitoring consisted occasionally of a finger on the pulse. Sterilization was accomplished by boiling. Air-conditioning was not available. No records were kept and no recovery room was available. The same deficiencies existed in the category III hospital, which did not even have oropharyngeal airways, antiarrhythmic or inotropic medications, and sterile techniques were completely ignored. Despite these stark differences in care, the patients or their parents in all three hospitals appeared satisfied with the level of care they received. Much has to be done to improve anesthesia care in less fortunate departments in developing nations. Urgent help does not mean the need for sophisticated monitors or equipment only, but the establishment of practice standards first. Applying the priciples of modern management, we need to evaluate the structure, processes and outcome of anesthetic practice in developing countries in order to reengineer the way we provide help to anesthetic departments in developing nations. In this modest study we are presenting a means to evaluate the features and processes of the anesthesia services in developing countries.

Anesthesia Department, Hospital↗

PubMed1991

Clonidine does not delay recovery from anaesthesia.

Clonidine is known to reduce anaesthetic requirements and improve haemodynamic stability when given as premedication. This study, of 46 ASA I-II patients undergoing thyroid surgery, was designed to assess if clonidine interferes with recovery from anaesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to three groups to receive, 2 h before surgery, flunitrazepam 1 mg, clonidine 150 micrograms, or both drugs. Anaesthesia comprised thiopentone, alfentanil, isoflurane and 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Recovery from anaesthesia was assessed using a clinical score, electro-oculographic measurements and reaction times to auditory stimuli. Psychomotor tests were performed the day before surgery and 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after arrival of the patient in the recovery room. Psychomotor performance was decreased significantly after operation in the three groups (P less than 0.05) and returned to baseline at 240 min. There was no significant difference between the three groups. This study indicates that clonidine 150 micrograms orally before surgery does not delay recovery from anaesthesia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

A double-blind randomized prospective study comparing ondansetron with droperidol in the prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery.

A prospective double-blind study was conducted to compare the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol in preventing postoperative emesis following strabismus surgery. A sample size of 213 patients was divided into three equal groups to receive ondansetron 150 micrograms/kg (Group A), ondansetron 75 micrograms/kg (Group B), or droperidol 75 micrograms/kg (Group C). All patients received a standardized anaesthetic technique. All episodes of emesis, recovery time, and time to tolerating oral fluids were recorded. The incidence of emesis during 24 hours was Groups A and B 19.7%, and Group C 28.2%. The lower incidence of emesis recorded by the ondansetron groups compared with the droperidol group was not statistically significant. Ondansetron at 75 micrograms/kg was as effective as 150 micrograms/kg in reducing emesis when compared with droperidol. Mean time to discharge from the recovery room was 75.3 minutes (Group A), 44.4 minutes (Group B), and 41.0 minutes (Group C). The mean time to tolerating oral fluids was 356.5 minutes (Group A), 402.8 minutes (Group B), and 378.1 minutes (Group C). There was no statistical difference in discharge times from recovery or time to tolerating oral fluids in any of the three groups.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Hemothorax as complication of laparoscopic technique].

A 69-year-old woman with a hiatal hernia and esophagitis caused by reflux was scheduled for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Anesthetic induction was accomplished with fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium and maintenance with sevoflurane and rocoronium. Hemodynamics were stable until the end of surgery, when a sudden decrease in blood pressure to 40/20 mm Hg and arterial carbon dioxide tension to 14 mm Hg were observed. Anesthetic insufflation was stopped and physiological saline solution and ephedrine were administered. Hemothorax and air embolism were ruled out. After hemodynamic recovery, renewal of anesthetic insufflation was contraindicated, laparoscopy was halted, and hemoperitoneum was ruled out. After extubation, the patient was transferred to the recovery room, where hemodynamic instability worsened progressively. A chest radiograph suggest left hemothorax and an emergency thoracotomy was performed. After evacuation of multiple clots from the pleural cavity, the point of hemorrhage was located at the right crus of the diaphragm and bleeding was arrested. Postoperative recovery continued with no further events. The most common complications of laparoscopy are pneumothorax, gastroesophageal perforation and hemorrhage. However, given the complexity of the technique, the possibility of bleeding in the pleural cavity, as occurred in this case, should be considered. This case highlights the importance of rigorous intraoperative monitoring and postoperative surveillance by the anesthesiologist.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Tramadol or morphine administered during operation: a study of immediate postoperative effects after abdominal hysterectomy.

Tramadol may cause awareness and EEG activation during anaesthesia. We compared tramadol with morphine, administered during wound-closure, surmising that tramadol may cause earlier awakening, more rapid recovery, less respiratory depression and equivalent pain relief. Forty patients received nitrous oxide-enflurane for abdominal surgery. At wound closure, patients received tramadol 3 mg kg-1 or morphine 0.2 mg kg-1 and end-tidal enflurane concentrations were maintained at 0.5 kPa until skin closure, whereupon anaesthesia was discontinued. Times to spontaneous respiration, awakening and orientation were similar in the two groups, as were blood-gas tensions, ventilatory frequency, pain scores and incidence of nausea. Half of each group required supplementary analgesia during their 90-min stay in the recovery room. P-deletion counts improved more rapidly in the tramadol group. This study confirms previous reports that tramadol did not antagonize the hypnotic effects of volatile anaesthetics. Tramadol, administered during operation, was as effective as morphine in providing postoperative analgesia while permitting more rapid psychomotor recovery.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Desflurane. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its efficacy in general anaesthesia.

Desflurane is a halogenated ether inhalation general anaesthetic agent with low solubility in blood and body tissues, and approximately one-fifth the potency of isoflurane. The pharmacodynamic properties of desflurane generally resemble those of isoflurane; thus, it produces dose-dependent depression of the central nervous and cardiorespiratory systems, and tetanic fade at the neuromuscular junction. The alveolar equilibration of desflurane is rapid (90% complete at 30 minutes compared with 73% for isoflurane). Both desflurane and isoflurane are distributed to various tissues to a similar extent. Desflurane is resistant to chemical degradation and undergoes negligible metabolism (approximately equal to 10% of that seen with isoflurane). Desflurane 'wash-out' is approximately equal to 2 to 2.5 times faster than that of isoflurane in the first 2 hours after discontinuation of anaesthesia. The low solubility of desflurane facilitates a rapid induction of anaesthesia and precise control of the depth of anaesthesia (during maintenance). Results from a few clinical studies indicate that emergence from desflurane is significantly earlier (by approximately equal to 2 to 6 minutes) than that from propofol anaesthesia, whereas other studies do not concur. In comparison with isoflurane, emergence from desflurane anaesthesia is significantly earlier (by 5 minutes) after ambulatory and approximately equal to 50% earlier (also significant) after nonambulatory surgical procedures. Limited comparative studies with halothane or sevoflurane also suggest an earlier time of emergence from desflurane anaesthesia. Comparative studies of desflurane and propofol, and other inhalation agents, indicate that the times to toleration of oral fluids, sitting and discharge from recovery room are similar, regardless of the general anaesthetic agent administered. However, some limited data in elderly patients (aged > 65 years) suggest that this patient group spends a significantly shorter time in the postanaesthesia care unit after desflurane than after isoflurane anaesthesia. Differences, if any, in the recovery of cognitive and psychomotor functions after desflurane or propofol anaesthesia remain unclear. However, in comparison with isoflurane anaesthesia, recovery of these functions (up to 45 minutes post-operatively) occurs earlier after desflurane. Significantly fewer patients are subjectively impaired (i.e. drowsy, clumsy, fatigued or confused) upon recovery from desflurane than from isoflurane anaesthesia. Likewise, significantly fewer adult patients are delirious when recovering from desflurane than from isoflurane anaesthesia, though in paediatric patients delirium is more likely when recovering from desflurane than from halothane anaesthesia. Haemodynamic stability during coronary artery surgery is as well maintained with desflurane as with isoflurane, and the drug does not worsen the adverse postoperative outcomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Is the bispectral index useful in predicting fast-track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol and desflurane?

UNLABELLED: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that outpatients with higher electroencephalographic (EEG) Bispectral Index (BIS) values at the end of anesthesia achieve a modified Aldrete score of 10 and satisfy fast-track eligibility criteria more rapidly after ambulatory surgery. Sixty consenting women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation procedures were studied. After premedication with midazolam 2 mg IV, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg IV, fentanyl 1.5 microg/kg IV, and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg IV and was initially maintained with either desflurane 4% (n = 31) or a propofol infusion 100 microg kg(-1) min(-1) (n = 29), in combination with nitrous oxide 65% in oxygen. Subsequently, the inspired desflurane concentrations (2%-6%) and propofol infusion rates (50-150 microg.kg(-1) min(-1) were varied to maintain a clinically acceptable depth of anesthesia. The average BIS value during the 3-min interval immediately before the discontinuation of the maintenance anesthetics was recorded. Emergence times and modified Aldrete scores were assessed from the end of anesthesia until patients were considered fast-track-eligible. The BIS values at the end of anesthesia were significantly correlated with the time to reach fast-track eligibility in both the desflurane (r = -0.68) and propofol (r = -0.76) groups. We concluded that the EEG-BIS value at the end of anesthesia is useful in predicting fast-track eligibility after laparoscopic tubal ligation procedures with either a desflurane- or propofol-based anesthetic technique. IMPLICATIONS: In outpatients receiving either desflurane and propofol anesthesia for laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery, the times to achieve criteria for bypassing the recovery room (i.e., fast-tracking) correlated with the electroencephalographic-Bispectral Index values at the end of anesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Efficacy of tramadol versus meperidine for pain relief and safe recovery after adenotonsillectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adequate relief of pain after tonsillectomy is a common problem. We compared meperidine and tramadol when given at induction of anaesthesia with respect to their effects on postoperative pain relief and emergence characteristics after adenotonsillectomy in children. METHODS: Fifty children aged 4-7 yr undergoing tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to receive either tramadol 1 mg kg(-1) (n = 25) or meperidine 1 mg kg(-1) (n = 25) before commencement of the surgical procedure. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol (with cis-atracurium for muscle relaxation) and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen and nitrous oxide. Postoperative pain was scored by a blinded observer using a facial pain scale in the recovery room at 0 (at arrival of the patient in the postoperative care unit) and at 10, 20 and 45 min thereafter. Agitation scores were also assessed by the same observer at 0 min. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded at regular intervals. The time to recovery to spontaneous respiration and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were noted. RESULTS: Facial pain scale scores were increased in the tramadol group at 0, 10 and 20 min (P < 0.05). No difference was observed in scores at the 45th min postoperation. Agitation scores were higher in the tramadol group than in the meperidine group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups. Heart rates and mean arterial pressures were similar in both groups. The time to recovery to spontaneous respiration was delayed with meperidine compared with tramadol (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Meperidine was more effective for pain relief and provides better emergence characteristics than tramadol after tonsillectomy in children.

Adenoidectomy↗