Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FLUOROURACIL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14-treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.94). A slightly non-statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.16). CONCLUSION: In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase II multi-institutional randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin with or without fluorouracil in patients with untreated, advanced gastric, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the contribution of docetaxel to combination chemotherapy in the outcome of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We compared the overall response rate (ORR) and safety of docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) with DC plus fluorouracil (DCF) to select either DC or DCF as the experimental treatment in the ensuing phase III part of trial V-325. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II randomized study, untreated patients with confirmed advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma received either DCF (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/d as continuous infusion on days 1 to 5) or DC (docetaxel 85 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. An independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) was to select one of the two regimens based primarily on ORR and safety profile. RESULTS: Of 158 randomly assigned patients, 155 (DCF, n = 79; DC, n = 76) received treatment. The confirmed ORR was 43% for DCF (n = 79) and 26% for DC (n = 76). Median time to progression was 5.9 months for DCF and 5.0 months for DC. Median overall survival time was 9.6 months for DCF and 10.5 months for DC. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 events per patient included neutropenia (DCF = 86%; DC = 87%) and GI (DCF = 56%; DC = 30%). CONCLUSION: Both regimens were active, but DCF produced a higher confirmed ORR than DC. Toxicity profiles of DCF were considered manageable. The IDMC chose DCF for the phase III part of V-325, which compares DCF with cisplatin plus fluorouracil.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Multifocal inflammatory leukoencephalopathy associated with levamisole and 5-fluorouracil: case report.

Levamisole and 5-fluorouracil have now become the standard chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with Stage III colon carcinoma. A case of multifocal inflammatory leukoencephalopathy secondary to levamisole alone or combination of levamisole and 5-fluorouracil is reported. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium demonstrated multifocal contrast-enhancing frontal, parietal, occipital, and periventricular white matter lesions. A stereotactic biopsy revealed reactive gliosis and macrophage infiltration, without evidence of metastatic tumor. Despite continuation of 5-fluorouracil, resolution of contrast-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging without further neurological sequelae occurred when levamisole was stopped. The patient died with evidence of systemic metastasis 6 months later. Autopsy examination of the brain revealed multifocal demyelinating lesions, with no evidence of metastatic tumor. Immunoperoxidase studies of demyelinated lesions demonstrated infiltrating macrophages strongly positive for Class II antigens, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 alpha. Surrounding astrocytes were positive for granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Small numbers of perivascular T cells were present. This patient represents the first autopsy documented case of levamisole associated multifocal inflammatory leukoencephalopathy.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Local and sustained delivery of 5-fluorouracil from biodegradable microspheres for the radiosensitization of malignant glioma: a randomized phase II trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was a randomized, multicenter Phase II trial comparing the effect of perioperative implantation of 5-fluorouracil-releasing microspheres followed by early radiotherapy (Arm A) and early radiotherapy alone (Arm B) in patients with gross total resection of high-grade glioma. METHODS: Patients were randomized on clinical and radiological assumption of supratentorial high-grade glioma. All patients underwent surgery, and after resection and histological confirmation, patients randomized to Arm A received multiple injections of microsphere suspension (130 mg of 5-fluorouracil). Conventional fractionated radiotherapy (59.4 Gy) was initiated between the second and the seventh day after surgery for both arms. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were randomized. Seventy-seven patients were treated and analyzed in intention to treat for efficacy and safety. Overall survival was 15.2 months in Arm A and 13.5 months in Arm B. In the subpopulation of patients with complete resection, overall survival was 15.2 months in Arm A versus 12.3 months in Arm B. However, these differences were not significant. Safety was acceptable with prophylactic high doses of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: It may be hypothesized that the implantation of 5-fluorouracil-loaded microspheres in the wall of the cavity resection did increase the overall survival, but the present study was not designed and sufficiently powered to demonstrate this.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1993

The synthesis and in vitro and in vivo stability of 5-fluorouracil prodrugs which possess serum albumin binding potency.

For a new drug delivery system of 5-fluorouracil, we prepared prodrugs possessing certain desired properties. The prodrugs, 1-(N-4-chlorophenyl-N-methylcarbamoyl)-5-fluorouracil and 1-(N-2,4-dichlorophenyl-N-methylcarbamoyl)-5-fluorouracil, contain high serum albumin binding potency and a comparably long half life in the bloodstream in vivo to Tegafur. These two prodrugs are expected to be retained in the bloodstream as a polymeric complex with albumin and to circulate in the body for a long time, like a polymeric prodrug.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Therapeutic efficacy of 5-fluorouracil prodrugs using endogenous serum proteins as drug carriers: a new strategy in drug delivery system.

To establish a novel drug delivery system for 5-fluorouracil (5FU), we have developed a system in which the low-molecular-weight prodrugs of 5FU bound to endogenous serum proteins, thus circulating like those proteins. Subsequently, the prodrugs were slowly hydrolyzed to generate active 5FU in the bloodstream. To examine the therapeutic effect of these prodrugs, we injected them into BALB/c mice previously implanted subcutaneously with Meth A sarcoma. Among the prodrugs, 1-(N-4-chlorophenyl-N-methylcarbamoyl)-5-fluorouracil (5FU-1pCPMC) was effective in reducing tumors and prolonging survival time. The non-hydrolyzable compound, 1-(4-chlorobenzyl)-5-fluorouracil, did not show any therapeutic effect, suggesting that the therapeutic efficacy of 5FU-1pCPMC is due to the sustained release of 5FU from the serum protein-prodrug complex. The data shown here may create a new field in drug delivery system technology.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

Antitumor activity of 1-alkoxycarbonylalkylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil derivatives by oral administration.

Antitumor activity of seven 5-fluorouracil derivatives having carbamoyl linkage with amino acid was examined against L-1210 leukemia, adenocarcinoma 755, ascites sarcoma 180, Ehrlich ascites carcinoma and Lewis lung carcinoma by oral administration. These compounds showed more than 30% increase in life-span (ILS) against L-1210 at optimal doses when given by oral administration. Therapeutic ratios (ILSmax/ILS30) of 1-methoxycarbonylmethylcarbamoyl and 1-(1-ethoxycarbonyl-3-methylthiopropylcarbamoyl) derivatives of 5-fluorouracil in L-1210 system were 4.8 and 4.7, respectively. 1-Methoxycarbonylmethylcarbamoyl and 1-(2-ethoxycarbonylethylcarbamoyl) derivatives of 5-fluorouracil inhibited completely the growth of adenocarcinoma 755 when given orally, but only 1-methoxycarbonylmethylcarbamoyl derivative inhibited 99 and 98% of the growth of ascites sarcoma 180 and Ehrlich ascites carcinoma, respectively. The latter compound increased the life-span to 48% at optimal dose in Lewis lung carcinoma system.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

[Levofolinate and fluorouracil combination therapy].

Levofolinate and fluorouracil regimen (l-leucovorin and 5 fluorouracil regimen) is a biochemical modulation of 5 fluorouracil (5FU) by leucovorin (LV). In the USA and Europe d,l-LV and 5FU regimen is frequently administered for colorectal cancer treatment and recognized as the standard regimen. In Japan, multi-institutional clinical trials of l-leucovorin (l-LV), a bioactive diastereomer of leucovorin, and 5FU combination were conducted for the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer with comparable results to the US/Europe data. This l-LV and 5FU regimen was approved in August 1999 for the indications of advanced gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. The dosage and administration is referred to the weekly method developed at RPMI. Recently, the irinotecan (CPT-11) or oxariplatin plus LV and 5FU combination showed higher antitumor activities than the LV and 5FU combination with increased progression-free survival. These regimens, however, are not yet properly established because clinical trial results with Japanese patients are not completed for agreement of the dosage and administration schedule. For the l-LV and 5FU regimen diarrhea and leukocytopenia, including grade 3 and higher, were reported as the major adverse events. Administration for eligible patients with periodical monitoring of diagnostic data is necessary.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1992

Novel derivatives of 5-fluorouridine and 5-fluorouracil having potent antitumor and lower immunosuppressive activities.

We studied the biological activities of several 5-fluorouridine (5-FUR) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivatives to find novel antitumor drugs with lower immunosuppressive effects. We examined 5-FUR and 5-FU derivatives acylated with (2-n-propyl-n-pentanoyl)glycine (KN-539). Among the examined compounds, we found satisfactory activities in a derivative of 5-FUR, 2',3',5'-tris-O-[N-(2-n-propyl-n-pentanoyl)glycyl]-5-fluorouridine (UK-21), and a derivative of 5-FU, 1-(6-[N-(2-n-propyl-n-pentanoyl)glycyl] amino-n-hexylcarbamoyl)-5-fluorouracil (UK-25). UK-21 (0.05-0.2 mmole/kg, p.o., 10 days) and UK-25 (0.1-0.4 mmole/kg, p.o., 10 days) suppressed Meth A and E.L.4 tumor growths in the corresponding syngeneic hosts (BALB/c mice and C57BL/6 mice, respectively) without decreasing body weight and blood leukocyte count. UK-21 and UK-25 suppressed the proliferation of KB tumor cells in vitro (IC50: 3.0 x 10(-11) M and 4.4 x 10(-7) M, respectively) at concentrations almost equivalent to those of 5-FUR and 5-FU, respectively. These results suggest that UK-21 and UK-25 express their antitumor activity as 5-FUR and 5-FU, respectively. Neither UK-21 nor UK-25 suppressed thymus weight and humoral antibody production against sheep red blood cells (SRBC) in ddY mice, although 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (FT-207) and 5-FU suppressed them in their respective therapeutic dose ranges for tumors. Thus, UK-21 and UK-25 are expected to develop into anticancer drugs with lower immunotoxicological effects.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Management of intravaginal warts in women with 5-fluorouracil (1%) in vaginal hydrophilic gel: a placebo-controlled double-blind study.

The purpose of this placebo-controlled, double-blind study was to determine the safety, tolerability and clinical efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (1%) in a vaginal hydrophilic gel (hydroxyethylcellulose, 1%) to cure intravaginal papillomas in women. Pre-selected, 60 women ranging between 18 and 50 years of age (mean 24.6), having 312 vaginal condylomas (mean 5.2) joined the study. The diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) was established with clinical, histopathological and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Subjects were randomized into 2 parallel groups. Each patient was allocated a pre-coded tube 15 g (active or placebo) with graduated vaginal applicators (disposable), and instructions how to insert 4 g of the trial medication deep into the vagina once at bedtime on every other day (1, 3 and 5) per week, to visit the clinic on day 7 for clinical evaluations and to receive the same pre-coded replacement to continue the regimen for another week. A maximum 12 applications were to be used in 4 weeks. Cure was defined as absence of clinical signs of infection, re-confirmed by PCR and Southern blot hybridization negative HPV DNA. By the end of the treatment 48.4% patients and 51.9% lesions were cured. Breaking the code revealed that 5-fluorouracil (1%) gel had cured 83.3% patients and 87% intravaginal warts. Placebo resolved 13.3% patients and 14% condylomas; (active gel versus placebo; P < 0.001). Twelve patients (20%) mostly in the active gel experienced mild erythema, erosion and oedema, with no drop-outs. Among cured patients 3 had a relapse after 16 months. In conclusion, the clinical results of the study demonstrate that 5-fluorouracil (1%) in a vaginal hydrophilic gel is safe, tolerable and significantly more effective than placebo to cure intravaginal warts in women.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed2006

Effects of 5-fluorouracil adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy has been the standard adjuvant treatment for Stage III colon cancer. After the initial introduction of 5-fluorouracil in standard treatment protocols, several changes have been made based on results of randomized studies on various treatment regimens, including new cytotoxic agents. In Stage II patients, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is debatable. However, there might be a role for adjuvant treatment in certain high-risk patients. Following a search of the Medline database, the results of randomized studies on 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy are reviewed, and future therapeutic options are discussed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1991

Comparative antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil and its prodrugs in combination with hyperthermia in vitro.

We investigated the antitumor activities of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) and 1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil (FT-207) in combination with hyperthermia in vitro. The antitumor effect of 5-FU (10(-4) M) was slightly enhanced by combination with hyperthermia (42 degrees C) for 2h, and the effect was determined to be additive. Synergistic enhancement of antitumor activity was obtained by the concurrent use of hyperthermia (42 degrees C, 2h) and 5'-DFUR (10(-4) M) or HCFU (10(-5) M). However, the antitumor effect of FT-207 (10(-4) M) in combination with hyperthermia was comparable that of hyperthermia alone. The synergistic enhancement of antitumor activity was not obtained for all drugs when the cells were preheated at 42 degrees C for 2h. On the other hand, when cells were pretreated with drugs before heat exposure, weak interactions were obtained after 5-FU and 5'-DFUR treatment, and a synergistic interaction was obtained after HCFU treatment. It is speculated that the metabolites of 5'-DFUR and HCFU enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-FU, or might change the threshold concentration for a cytotoxic effect of 5-FU in cancer cells.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Can pharmacokinetic monitoring improve clinical use of fluorouracil?

Fluorouracil is used clinically against a variety of solid tumors. It is a prodrug that undergoes a series of intracellular conversions to active cytotoxic species. There is wide interindividual variability in fluorouracil metabolism; furthermore, it has nonlinear kinetics that make it relatively more difficult to predict plasma concentrations after brief infusions compared with prolonged infusions. There is an increasing body of evidence that relates plasma fluorouracil concentrations to toxicity and effectiveness, and consequently there may be a definable mathematical relationship that describes a 'therapeutic window'. Dose nomograms and pharmacokinetic models based on limited sampling strategies have been developed, as have empirical dose escalation schedules based on multivariate analysis of the determinants of toxicity, The utility of these approaches should be tested in properly powered, prospective, randomised trials.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Cost effectiveness of adding folinic acid to fluorouracil plus levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of the addition of folinic acid to fluorouracil plus levamisole in patients with colon cancer from the perspective of the German Social Health Insurance. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with International Union Against Cancer (Union International Contre Cancer; UICC) II/T(4) or UICC III colon cancer enrolled in an open-label randomised clinical trial in Germany (Forschungsgruppe Onkologie Gastrointestinaler Tumoren-1 [FOGT-1]) received either fluorouracil plus levamisole (A, standard) or fluorouracil plus levamisole and folinic acid (B) for 12 months as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative intended surgery. Outcome measures for economic evaluation were disease-free life-years gained (df-LYG) and overall life-years gained (LYG) derived from the respective Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Direct medical costs from the perspective of the German Social Health Insurance were estimated retrospectively (2000 values) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. A Markov model was used to project the trial results beyond 5 years for the patients' remaining life expectancy. RESULTS: Adding folinic acid to the fluorouracil/levamisole regimen results in an increase in time to progression and survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. Within the trial period of 5 years ICERs (B versus A) were 33,008 Euro per df-LYG and 51,225 Euro per LYG (costs and effects discounted at 5%). The Markov model yielded ICERs of 11,176 Euro per df-LYG and 11,020 Euro per LYG (costs and effects discounted at 5%). The model was robust for variations of key variables in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that the addition of folinic acid offers clinical benefits at additional costs which are likely to be acceptable for decision makers in the long term. Cost-effectiveness ratios calculated within the clinical trial period were just above 50,000 Euro/LYG. Because treatment benefits, i.e. prolonged survival, are sustained beyond 5 years whereas incremental costs are mainly incurred in the first year, results of the Markov model yielded cost-effectiveness ratios that compare more favourably with other published ICERs.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacogenomics of fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer: clinical implications.

Hepatic metastases occur in about half of patients with colorectal cancer. Since hepatic metastases are often not accessible for surgery, chemotherapy of metastases is important. The most commonly used chemotherapy drugs for hepatic metastases are fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. Several enzymes are known to be involved in the catabolism and anabolism of these drugs, and the activity of these enzymes varies greatly between individuals. The causes of this variation include genetic polymorphisms, different regulation between normal and cancer tissue, and the influence of chemotherapy on enzyme expression. The varying enzyme activity may have an important effect on the outcome of chemotherapy. Several studies confirm the influence of the activity of thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase on the outcome of fluorouracil therapy for colorectal cancer, with higher enzyme activities predicting lower treatment efficacy. Although fewer studies are available regarding therapy of hepatic metastases, the same relationship between thymidylate synthase activity and outcome of fluorouracil therapy observed for primary colorectal cancer was found. For the other two enzymes, only a few studies are available, but the results indicate similarly that higher enzyme activity seems to be disadvantageous. The enzymes responsible for the activation, metabolism and mechanism of action of irinotecan, namely carboxylesterase 2, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1), and topoisomerase-I, also exhibit variable interindividual activity. Thus, there may be an association between enzyme activity and response to therapy. For instance, in patients with colorectal cancer, higher enzyme activity of topoisomerase-I seems to be predictive of a better response to irinotecan. CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 activity levels might be predictive of irinotecan toxicity rather than efficacy. The degradation of oxaliplatin is independent of potentially varying enzyme activity, but for this drug, the DNA repair enzyme ERCC1 may influence the survival time after chemotherapy. Taken together, the available data indicate the importance of the different enzyme activities on the outcome of chemotherapy of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer. More information is needed, especially for the newer drugs irinotecan and oxaliplatin. However, the existing data are very promising in respect to the potential to guide dose and drug selection for more efficient and less toxic chemotherapy of hepatic metastases.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2006

Severe ventricular dysrhythmias and silent ischemia during infusion of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil and cis-platin.

The antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil is frequently used in the therapy of various malignancies. Cardiotoxicity has frequently been described during treatment, but there is no common agreement on the need to perform cardiovascular monitoring of patients during 5-fluorouracil administration. We report the case of a young patient with an head-neck cancer on whom a continuous electrocardiogram recording was performed, documenting serious ventricular dysrhythmias in the presence of myocardial ischemia during 5-fluorouracil and cis-platin infusion.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

Metabolism of 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU), a new antitumour agent, in rats, rabbits and dogs.

1. 1-Hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluoro[6-14C]uracil (14C-HCFU) administered orally to rats, rabbits and dogs at a dose of 20 mg/kg was well absorbed and rapidly excreted via the kidney. 2. HCFU was extensively biotransformed, and its six metabolites including two new metabolites were detected in plasma and urine of all three species. Two new metabolites were identified by spectral analysis as 1-(5-hydroxyhexylcarbamoyl)5-fluorouracil and 1-(5-oxohexylcarbamoyl)-5-fluorouracil. 3. The metabolic pathways of HCFU in the three species involved oxidations and scission of the side-chain with successive degradation of the fluorouracil (FU) released. 4. The two main routes of oxidations of the side chain were omega-oxidation and omega-1-oxidation. Rats metabolized HCFU preferentially by the former reaction, while in rabbits and dogs the latter reaction predominated.

Absorption↗
PubMed1991

Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and either epirubicin or mitoxantrone: a comparative randomized multicenter study in metastatic breast carcinoma.

From February 1987 to January 1989, 60 patients with advanced breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized and studied, with 31 treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and 29 patients with fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide (FNC). Doses were 500 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, and 50 mg/m2 epirubicin2 or 10 mg/m mitoxantrone, i.v. Day 1 every 3 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment patient characteristics between the groups. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for response (29 in the FEC arm and 27 in the FNC arm). The response rates were 48.2% for the FEC group (complete response (CR) 10.3% and partial response (PR) 37.9%) and 40.7% for the FNC group (CR 3.7% and PR 37%) (not significantly different, NS). The median response duration was 247 and 267 days, respectively (NS), the median time to progression and time to treatment failure was 244 and 155.5 days for the FEC group and 86 and 98 days for the FNC group, respectively (NS). The incidence of nausea/vomiting was 87.1% in the FEC group and 79.3% in the FNC group, with comparable severity. Alopecia occurred in 80.6% of FEC patients and 44.8% of FNC patients (p less than 0.05). The incidences and degrees of severity of leukopenia, anemia, and cardiotoxicity were comparable in the two treatment groups. Efficacy and toxicity of the two regimens were quite similar. FNC can improve the quality of life of patients by providing significantly less alopecia.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗