[A case of esophageal diverticula associated with colonic diverticulosis].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In 2 years 41 patients were treated surgically for septic complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Nine patients had fistulae arising from sigmoid diverticular disease. Resection of the sigmoid was undertaken as the primary procedure in 8 patients with anastomosis in 5. Thirty-two patients had pericolic abscesses or peritonitis. The outcome (morbidity, length of stay) of the 21 patients who underwent primary resection was compared with that of the 11 patients treated by defunctioning colostomy alone. The better results in the larger group of 21 patients indicate that primary resection should be the treatment of choice for the septic complications of diverticular disease.
Studies of the aetiology of diverticular disease of the colon have been focused on intraluminal pressure for almost three decades. It is only relatively recently that the mechanical properties of the wall of the colon have been examined. The tensile strength and elasticity of the colon decline with age and this is the most marked in the left colon which is the narrowest and thickest part. This review discusses the case that the mechanical properties of the bowel wall are key factors in the development of diverticular disease. The potential role of high fibre diets in reducing the pressure changes which may stress the colon wall in this disease is also considered.
Fifty patients with severe complications of diverticular disease were compared with two groups of 50 controls, matched for age and sex. The first control group (A) was randomly selected from all emergency hospital admissions, and the second group (B) from patients with uncomplicated diverticular disease. Of the 50 study patients, 24 (48 per cent) were taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the time of admission compared with nine (18 per cent) of control group A and ten (20 per cent) of control group B. Both of these differences were statistically significant, indicating a strong association between the ingestion of NSAIDs and the development of severe complications of diverticular disease.
A review of closure of Hartmann's colostomy was undertaken to establish guidelines for the timing and technique of reversal. Between 1984 and 1990 there were 69 reversals; 48 patients originally had diverticular disease and 21 had carcinoma. One-third underwent reversal before 4 months and two-thirds after this time. The operative mortality rate was 3 per cent and the anastomotic leak rate 4 per cent. Significant morbidity occurred in 30 per cent. There was no advantage in delayed closure. Complications occurred in 24 per cent of patients undergoing reversal before and 35 per cent undergoing reversal after 4 months. Thirty-five anastomoses were hand-sewn and 34 stapled. There were no differences in operating time for the two techniques, but a greater number were stapled after 4 months than before (P less than 0.05), which may reflect increased rectal stump shrinkage with time. There were no differences in complication rates whether the anastomosis was hand-sewn (34 per cent) or stapled (26 per cent). Closure of Hartmann's colostomy is a safe procedure but has a significant morbidity in nearly one-third of cases. On the basis of these results, there is no indication to delay closure after 4 months have elapsed, and earlier reversal, when the rectal stump is most accessible, is recommended.
BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients with colonic diverticula experience unexplained, recurrent, short-lived but often debilitating abdominal pain and alteration in bowel habit. Such patients account for many medical consultations every year but, as our understanding of the cause of their symptoms remains imperfect, treatment options are limited. This article reviews the possible mechanisms that may be responsible for the symptoms of diverticular disease. METHODS: Medline and Science Citation Index searches were performed to locate English language articles relating to colonic diverticula and symptoms published between January 1966 and July 2002. Manual cross-referencing was also performed and some historical articles were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Several theories now exist about the mechanisms underlying the symptoms of diverticular disease. Initial studies suggested that they may be due to alterations in the intracolonic pressure, extrapolating earlier thoughts on the likely pathogenesis of diverticula. It seems more likely, however, that several inter-related processes, such as muscular dysfunction, visceral hypersensitivity and inflammation, are involved in symptom generation.
More than 60% of patients who are submitted to Hartmann's procedure refuse to undergo reversal. This procedure is in fact a major undertaking associated with significantly mortality and morbidity rates. The authors suggest a minimally invasive approach without pneumoperitoneum. A consecutive series of four male patients, average age 64 years, underwent laparoscopic assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure in our department. The procedure was performed for intestinal malignant occlusion in two cases and for perforated diverticulitis in the other two. Mobilization was nearly immediate and incisional pain almost absent; peristalsis restarted after 36-48 h. Finally, the patients were discharged on day 6. Neither mortality nor morbidity occurred in the 8-month follow-up period. The authors conclude that this new laparoscopic procedure may lead to shorter hospital stays and increased acceptance by patients, while maintaining the same safety of the traditional open procedure.
BACKGROUND: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding can be a confusing clinical conundrum, the satisfactory evaluation and management of which requires a disciplined and orderly approach. Diagnosis and management has evolved with the development of new technology such as selective mesenteric angiography and colonoscopy. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to review the available data in the literature and to determine the current optimum method of evaluation and management of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage most likely to result in a successful outcome. METHODS: Data available on the topic of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the English literature were obtained via MEDLINE search and were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: The colonic origin of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in order of decreasing incidence is diverticulosis, inflammatory bowel disease, including ischemic and infectious colitis, colonic neoplasia, benign anorectal disease, and arteriovenous malformations. Approximately 10 to 15 percent of all cases of rectal bleeding are attributable to a cause that is proximal to the ligament of Treitz. Small intestinal sources such as arteriovenous malformations, diverticula, and neoplasia account for between 3 and 5 percent of all cases. Colonoscopy successfully identified an origin in severe hematochezia in 74 to 82 percent of cases. Mesenteric angiography has a sensitivity of 42 to 86 percent. The best method of management depends on whether hemorrhage persists, the severity of continued hemorrhage, the cumulative transfusion requirement, and the specific origin of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a complex clinical problem that requires disciplined and sophisticated evaluation for successful management. Diverticulosis is the most common cause. Colonoscopy is the diagnostic procedure of choice both for its accuracy in localization and its therapeutic capability. Selective mesenteric angiography should be reserved for those patients in whom colonoscopy is not practical. Precise identification of the bleeding source is crucial for a successful outcome. Specific directed therapy, such as segmental colonic resection for bleeding diverticulosis, is associated with the highest success rate and the lowest morbidity. A complete review of lower gastrointestinal bleeding is contained herein.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Inflammatory involvement of the inferior mesenteric vein complicating sigmoid diverticulitis resulted in septic thrombophlebitis and the presence of gas within the inferior mesenteric vein. Gas within the mesenteric and portal veins is an infrequent and relatively nonfatal complication of diverticulitis and can be recognized readily on CT scan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of laparostomy in the management of patients with severe intra-abdominal infection resulting from colorectal disease. METHODS: Seven patients, four with inflammatory bowel disease, two with colorectal carcinoma, and one with diverticular perforation, underwent laparostomy during a six-year period for postoperative, severe, intra-abdominal infection. RESULTS: The median age was 42 years, the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 22.7, and the observed mortality was 28.6 percent (2/7 patients). In one patient the laparostomy was closed at 11 days; in all the others the wound was left to heal by granulation and contraction, and two of these later required reconstructive surgery. The median follow-up was three years and seven months. CONCLUSION: Laparostomy is an effective and practical method of managing patients with severe intra-abdominal infection as a result of colorectal disease.
UNLABELLED: Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is a commonly performed surgical procedure. The postoperative outcome of these patients, however, has not been studied in detail in the Asian population. AIM: The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome of patients following total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. METHOD: All patients subjected to a total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis during a six-year period from February 1989 to October 1995 were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (male:female, 40:26) with a mean age of 55.2 (range, 20-88) years underwent total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Median follow-up after surgery was 26 (range, 4-78) months. Indications for surgery were synchronous or metachronous tumors (18), complicated pancolonic diverticular disease (15), obstructed tumors with impending perforation (13), familial adenomatous polyposis (7), slow-transit constipation (6), and others (7). Mean operative time was 137 +/- 48 minutes. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 13.3 +/- 11.9 days. Time to first bowel movement and commencement of solid diet were 4.7 +/- 1.8 and 7.2 +/- 2.4 days, respectively. Four patients had prolonged postoperative ileus. Average stool frequencies per day were 5.5 at one week, 4.3 at one month, 3.9 at six months, 3.2 at one year, and 2.9 at two years postoperatively. Thirty-three patients (50 percent) required antidiarrheal treatment for a transient period, but none required long-term therapy. Ninety-seven percent of all patients rated the functional outcome as good to excellent, and 3 percent said it was fair. There was two perioperative mortalities. Five cases required re-laparotomy, three for anastomotic complications and two for hemoperitoneum. Five patients had recurrent admissions for adhesion colic, which resolved with nonsurgical therapy. Ten patients succumbed on follow-up, six to tumor recurrence, two to unrelated cancers (stomach and bladder), and three to medical conditions. CONCLUSION: The functional outcome of ileorectal anastomosis is generally rated as good to excellent by patients. Acceptable bowel function and control is regained within six months of the operation and levels off at one year after surgery, and no patient requires long-term antidiarrheal medication.
The study group consisted of 102 patients that presented for evaluation of rectal bleeding. All patients were 50 years of age or less and were evaluated with a flexible endoscope and an anoscope. The findings from each examination were recorded independently. Sigmoidoscopy and anoscopy were performed in 56 patients less than age 40 (group I), and colonoscopy and anoscopy were performed on 46 patients between the ages of 40 but less than 50 years (group II). Anoscopy was superior to flexible endoscopy in detecting hemorrhoids in group I (P < 0.001 and group II (P < 0.004). The guaiac status of patients was not influenced by the presence of hemorrhoids. Three patients in group I and eight patients in group II had polyps. The likelihood of finding a polyp was not influenced by the guaiac status of the patients. Three patients in group I and one patient in group II had anal fissures that were missed with flexible endoscopy and detected with anoscopy. Five of 102 patients were noted to have diverticula; all of these were in group II. However, this was not felt to be the source of the bleed given the clinical history. Overall, six patients had colitis; all but one of these patients were less than 40 years of age. Flexible endoscopy and anoscopy provide complimentary information in middle-aged adults with rectal bleeding.