Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DERMATITIS, CONTACT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53Linked to original sources

Allergic contact dermatitis from para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) in athletic tape and leather adhesive.

4 girls with severe allergic contact dermatitis from a brand of athletic tape and a cobbler with allergic contact dermatitis from leather adhesive are presented. Alkylphenol resin with unknown chemical structure had been compounded in both products. One of the girls developed foot dermatitis later from the adhesive used on the inside of new sneakers. By patch testing and chemical analysis of alkylphenol resin and the products, the 5 patients were given a specific diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis from PTBP-FR.

Adhesives↗

Sensitization versus elicitation in allergic contact dermatitis: potential differences at cellular and molecular levels.

The induction and elicitation phases of allergic contact dermatitis are very complicated processes that differ in many respects. Many issues remain to be investigated, especially in the elicitation phase of this disease. Several key molecules involved in the development and maintenance of allergic contact dermatitis have already been defined, including a number of different cytokines and adhesion molecules. Attempts are being made to develop new, more specific pharmacologic and immunologic inhibitors of their activity. Because patients who see a doctor are already sensitized, further elucidation of the factors affecting the elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis will greatly contribute to the prevention and treatment of the disease.

Cell Adhesion Molecules↗

[Allergic contact dermatitis due to eye drops. Their clinical features and the patch test results].

We studied the clinical manifestations and causative agents in cases with allergic contact dermatitis due to eye drops who consulted the Department of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School during the period of 9 years between January, 1987 and December, 1995. Among 66,165 cases who visited the department during the studied period, 3,903 were suspected as contact dermatitis or drug eruption and underwent patch test. 141 of 3,903 cases (3.6%) were patch tested with eye drops and 49 cases (34.8%) reacted positively and were diagnosed as allergic contact dermatitis. Allergic ingredients were tested in 36 cases by the patch test with every ingredient. The 49 cases diagnosed as allergic contact dermatitis by eye drops, included 17 males and 32 females. 81.6% of the patients were aged over 40 years. The most frequent ages were between 60 and 69 years. The period from onset to the first visit to us was less than two weeks in 54.1% of the cases, but 3 cases consulted us after more than six months. The determined allergens are noted in order of frequency as follows: 1) fradiomycin sulfate in 14 cases, 2) ketotifen fumarate in 6 cases, 3) dibekacin sulfate in 3 cases, 4) befunolol hydrochloride in 3 cases, 5) phenylephrine hydrochloride in 3 cases and 6) benzalkonium chloride, the preservative of eye drops in 3 cases. Fradiomycin sulfate showed cross reactions to other aminoglycosides in the present cases. Every ingredient should be tested as much as possible, because there is a possibility that a preservative or a vehicle ingredient may be the allergen, though the incidence is low.

Adolescent↗