Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 955 records · Page 53Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Prevalence, incidence, and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders during a 3-year follow-up study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural history of low back pain by its prevalence, incidence, and recurrence during a 3-year period and identify risk factors for cumulative incidence and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although some studies have described prevalence, incidence, or recurrence of low back pain, few studies have assessed two or more of these outcome measures simultaneously. Furthermore, little is known about the association between individual, physical, psychosocial, and health-related risk factors and cumulative incidence and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, a cohort of 288 scaffolders (response 85%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at three yearly follow-ups during 3 years. RESULTS: At baseline 60% of the study population had had an episode of low back pain in the past 12 months of which 22% was of chronic nature. During follow-up, the yearly incidence of low back pain varied between 20% and 28%, while yearly recurrence rates were 64% to 77%. Only few workers consistently reported the presence (20%) or absence (26%) of low back pain each year. Weak significant associations were present for the following: age 35 to 44 years, moderate general health, high strenuous arm movements, and body mass index with the cumulative incidence of low back pain. Significant associations were found between high manual handling of material and high job demand and low job control and the cumulative recurrence of low back pain, while moderate general health only showed a weak significant association with this outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Low back pain was a dynamic process with high rates for incidence, recurrence, and recovery. General health and work-related physical and psychosocial factors influenced both the incidence and recurrence of low back pain. The incidence and recurrence of low back pain depend strongly on the recall period of low back pain and the time-window of investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Medication use for low back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal observational study of primary care patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe medications prescribed for back pain, 2) to identify patient characteristics associated with type of drug therapy, 3) to determine if the prescription of certain drugs is associated with better outcomes, and 4) to compare physician prescribing behavior with national guidelines. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few previous studies have focused on medication prescribing patterns for back pain in primary care. METHODS: Two-hundred nineteen patients aged 20-69 years who were making a first visit for an episode of back pain were studied. After the visit, patients completed questionnaires regarding sociodemographic characteristics, health status, back pain experience, and use of medications. Symptom severity and dysfunction were assessed by telephone 1 week after the visit. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of patients were prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 35% muscle relaxants, 12% narcotics, and 4% acetaminophen. Twenty percent received no medications. Patients were more likely to receive medications if they had a desire for medication, pain below the knee, less than 3 weeks of pain before visit, more severe symptoms, or greater dysfunction. Patients with more severe symptoms were more likely to receive narcotics or muscle relaxants. Patients with greater dysfunction were also more likely to receive narcotics. Type of drug therapy predicted symptom severity but not dysfunction after 1 week. Controlling for other factors, those receiving medications had less severe symptoms after 1 week than patients who received no medication. Patients receiving both muscle relaxants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had the best outcomes. Medication use for back pain in this health maintenance organization was generally concordant with national guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, often augmented by muscle relaxants, are a standard medical treatment for back pain in primary care. In this observational study, patients prescribed medications, particularly muscle relaxants, reported less severe symptoms after 1 week than those receiving no medications. However, randomized trials are needed to determine which medication or combinations of medications are most effective.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The effect of insoles on the incidence and severity of low back pain among workers whose job involves long-distance walking.

The prevalence and incidence of low back pain in general society is high. Workers whose job involves walking long distances have an even higher tendency to suffer from low back pain. A positive effect of insoles in reducing low back pain was found in professional sports players. This was not examined on people whose job involves walking long distances. In this double blind prospective study we examined the effectiveness of insoles constructed in a computerized method to placebo insoles in 58 employees whose work entailed extensive walking and who suffered from low back pain. The evaluation was performed by the MILLION questionnaire, which is considered as a valid questionnaire for evaluation of low back pain. We calculated the differences of the pain intensity before and after the intervention, in the employees using the insoles manufactured by computer in comparison to the users of the placebo insoles. In each group, the analysis was performed in comparison to the baseline. A total of 81% of the employees preferred the real insoles as effective and comfortable in comparison to 19% of the users of the placebo insoles (P<0.05). The results of this study indicate a substantial improvement in the low back pain after the use of the true insoles. The average pain intensity according to the MILLION questionnaire before the use of the insoles was 5.46. However, after the use of the real insoles and the placebo insoles, the average pain intensity decreased to 3.96 and 5.11, respectively. The difference of the average pain intensity at the start of the study and after the use of the real insoles was significant: -1.49 (P=0.0001), whereas this difference after the use of the placebo insoles was not significant: -0.31 (P=0.1189). The reported severity of pain also decreased significantly: a level 5 pain and above was reported by 77% of the subjects at the start of the study. After the use of the real insoles only 37.9% of the subjects reported a similar degree of pain severity, and 50% of the subjects did so after the use of the placebo insoles (P< 0.05). We did not find a link between low back pain and other variables such as gender, age, number of offspring, work seniority, smoking, previous use of insoles and previous medication. This study demonstrates that the low back pain decreased significantly after the use of real insoles compared to placebo ones.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Back pain in young athletes. Significant differences from adults in causes and patterns.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there are significant differences in the causes of back pain in young athletes compared with the general adult population and to review the diagnosis and assessment of young athletic adolescent patients who present with this complaint. DESIGN: Retrospective randomized case comparison study with two cohorts segregated by age and type of activity. SETTING: The adolescent sports medicine clinic of a children's hospital compared with the acute low back pain clinic of an orthopedic hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred adolescent athletes (aged 12 to 18 years; mean age, 15.8 years) with a chief complaint of low back pain were compared with 100 adults (aged 21 to 77 years; mean age, 31.9 years) with acute low back pain. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of the adolescents had derangements of their posterior elements associated with the onset of back pain. Forty-seven percent of the 100 adolescents were ultimately shown to have a spondylolysis stress fracture of the pars interarticularis. By contrast, 5% of adult subjects were found to have spondylolysis associated with low back pain. Similarly, discogenic back pain was the final diagnosis in 48 of the 100 subjects in the adult group, while 11 of the 100 in the adolescent group had back pain attributable to disc abnormalities. Muscle-tendon strain accounted for back pain in 27% of the adults, while only 6% of the adolescents were diagnosed as having muscle-tendon strain. These differences were significant. Spinal stenosis and osteoarthritis as causes of back pain were encountered in 10% of the adults, while these conditions were not encountered in the children. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant differences in the major causes of low back pain in young athletes compared with causes of low back pain in the general adult population. Physicians diagnosing back pain in young athletes must have a specific understanding of these differences to avoid incorrect diagnosis and harmful delays in proper treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Influence of saddle type upon the incidence of lower back pain in equestrian riders.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible influences of saddle type on the incidence of "lower back pain" in a cross section of equestrian riders. METHODS: 108 equestrian riders completed a questionnaire concerning their riding habits and whether they suffered from lower back pain. In particular they were asked whether they used a traditional style/general purpose saddle (GP) or a deep seated/Western style saddle (W). RESULTS: 48% of the riders reported suffering from lower back pain, the incidence being higher in the GP saddle users (66%) than in W saddle users (23%) (P < 0.001). Female riders had a higher incidence of lower back pain than males, 58% v 27% (P < 0.005). When the genders were analysed separately for the effect of saddle type, males using the GP and W saddles had a 33% and 6% incidence of lower back pain respectively, while females using the GP and W saddles had a 72% and 33% incidence. The highest incidence of lower back pain occurred in the GP saddle users who had been riding for more than 15 years (P < 0.07). The data also indicated a possible tendency for there to be more low back pain among riders using a short stirrup length. No other factors were found to affect the incidence of lower back pain. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in the incidence of lower back pain between the users of the two saddle types may be due to the additional comfort, cushioning, postural positioning, and stability offered by the design of the deep seated saddle. The results suggest that, while a deep seated saddle is not suited to all equestrian activities, where possible its use should be considered because of its effect in reducing the risk of lower back pain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Pain clinic #11. Physical exercise in the treatment of low back pain. Part III: A practical regimen of strengthening exercise.

The first and second articles in this three-part series reviewed the research evidence for physical exercise in the treatment of low back pain and outlined a specific and practical program of stretching exercise. In this final paper, we will present and illustrate the remaining component of a physical exercise regimen utilized in the treatment of a large population of patients suffering either nonsurgical or postsurgical low back pain.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2006

Back pain in direct patient care providers: early intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy.

Back pain and injury are a widespread problem for direct care providers and can lead to disability and job loss. Although most intervention studies focus on the number of reported injuries as the outcome variable, pain is a leading indicator of impending injury. More secondary prevention interventions focusing on early detection and treatment of pain are needed to reduce injuries. The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and effect size of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention to reduce the measures of back pain, stress, and disability in direct care providers working with back pain. The secondary aim was to assess the association between affect and outcome variables, particularly unscheduled work absence, which is a component of disability. This randomized clinical trial recruited 32 registered nurses and nursing assistants with a history of back pain in the past year and assigned them to either an intervention or a control group. The CBT intervention was a weekly stress and pain management session over 6 weeks led by a clinical psychologist. Data for both groups were collected at baseline and at 6 weeks, with work absence data caused by back pain self-reported for 12 weeks. Pain intensity scores declined in the intervention group, indicating a large effect. However, stress scores increased. Depression scores accounted for one-third of the variance in hours absent because of back pain. Although there was a high dropout rate in the intervention group, a cognitive-behavioral intervention shows promise as a secondary prevention intervention.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1988

Pain clinic #10. Physical exercise in the treatment of low back pain. Part II: A practical regimen of stretching exercise.

In the first article of this three part series, research evidence for physical exercise in the treatment of low back pain were examined and data documenting significant therapeutic benefits was identified. However, different types and philosophies of exercise abound and, in clinical practice, little research evidence exists for substantiating one approach over another. This article will outline a practical physical stretching program with both empirical and research value in the treatment of over 4,100 patients with complaints of low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Use of the lidocaine patch 5% in reducing intensity of various pain qualities reported by patients with low-back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the lidocaine patch 5% on pain qualities associated with low-back pain (LBP) through use of the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled in an open-label, non-randomized, prospective, 6-week study involving 8 clinical trial sites in the United States. Eligible patients had non-radicular LBP and reported moderate-to-severe pain on the NPS at study enrollment. Patients were stratified to 3 groups based on the duration of their LBP, defined as acute/sub-acute (< 3 months), short-term chronic (3-12 months), or long-term chronic LBP (> 12 months). The lidocaine patch 5% was applied to the area of maximal pain, using no more than a total of 4 patches changed every 24 h. Effectiveness was measured by change from baseline to Week 2 and Week 6 in 4 composite measures of the NPS: NPS-10, NPS-4, NPS-8, and NPS-non-allodynia. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), dermal assessment of application site(s), and skin sensory testing. RESULTS: In the combined patient population (n = 71), 6 weeks of treatment with lidocaine patch 5% significantly improved all 4 NPS composite measures at both Week 2 and Week 6 (p < 0.001). Separate analyses by subgroups revealed differential improvements in the 4 composite measures. Eleven patients (15.5%) experienced treatment-related AEs that were primarily mild-to-moderate and dermal in nature. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe LBP, 2 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment with the lidocaine patch 5% significantly reduces the intensity of pain qualities as measured by all 4 NPS composite measures. Lidocaine patch 5% is well tolerated with few systemic AEs and may provide beneficial pain relief for patients receiving multidisciplinary treatment without increasing risks for adverse drug interactions. Pain scales such as the NPS offer the ability to measure various pain qualities experienced by LBP patients and may allow clinicians to assess the treatment impact of different medications.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Back pain in the general population of Catalonia (Spain). Prevalence, characteristics and therapeutic behavior].

BACKGROUND: Back pain is a common symptom of health assistance in Western countries. The goal of the present survey was to establish the prevalence of back pain in the general population in Catalonia, as well as to establish its characteristics, its relationship to sociodemographic variables, the therapeutic behavior followed by those affected and the associated-impairment and disabilities for the sufferers. METHODS: The survey was a descriptive study including a sample of 1,964 people, obtained from the census (1991) and representative of the population older than 18 years. The study was done in 1994 and data were obtained by means of a telephone interview. The prevalence of pain in the last six months was determined. Among those suffering back pain, additional information was obtained concerning its characteristics, the relationship with socio-demographic variables, the therapeutic behaviors used by patients, and the personal, social and work impairment and disabilities. RESULTS: Back pain was highly prevalent (50.9%), appeared in all ages (mean age of 47.6 years), was the highest in women (60.7%), in manual workers (54.9%) and in those less educated (71.1%). Back pain was long lasting (69.2% more than 3 years), frequent (49.7% more than the half of the days), and highly painful (severe-unbearable in 51.4%). The therapeutic behaviors most commonly used were the visit to the physician (71.9%), the use of alternative medical treatments (24.7%), physical therapy (22.7%, physical exercises and electrotherapy) and self-medication (14.6%, being acetylsalicylic acid the most employed). In general, the duration and degree of improvement was variable. Back pain limited the daily activities (36.7%) and forced to bed rest (22.7%). It was also a significant reason for time off work (17%) and disability pension (6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Back pain has a very high prevalence in the Catalonian population and is an important reason to seek medical attention. It greatly limits the daily personal and professional activities.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1996

Acute severe low back pain. A population-based study of prevalence and care-seeking.

STUDY DESIGN: Telephone interviews were conducted with a random sample of adults in 4437 North Carolina households. The response rate was 79%. OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of low back pain and the correlates of care-seeking in a defined population were examined. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous research on low back pain has used varying definitions of the illness of low back pain, and has admixed patients with acute and chronic low back pain. Acute low back pain was examined in this study as a distinct phenomenon separate from chronic low back pain. METHODS: Respondents completed a detailed interview regarding the occurrence of and care sought for back pain in 1991. Acute back pain was defined as functionally limiting pain lasting less than 3 months. RESULTS: From this sample, 485 individuals had at least one occurrence of acute severe low back pain in 1991, representing 7.6% of the adult population. Symptoms were reported less commonly in individuals older than age 60 years (5% vs. 8.5%) and in nonwhites compared with whites (5% vs. 8.5%). Thirty-nine percent of those with back pain sought medical care; 24% sought care initially from an allopathic physician, 13% from a chiropractor, and 2% from other providers. More prolonged pain, more severe pain, and sciatica were associated with care-seeking. Gender, income, age, rural residence, and health insurance status did not correlate with the decision to seek medical care. Younger age, male gender, and nonjob-related pain did correlate with the decision to seek care from a chiropractor. CONCLUSIONS: Acute back pain is common. Care is often sought regardless of income and insurance status. Seeing a health care provider for acute back pain may not be discretionary from the perspective of the patient.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: It is believed that the prevalence of back pain decreases around the middle of the sixth decade. However, back pain is still among the most commonly reported symptoms in the elderly and osteoarthritis, disc degeneration, osteoporosis and spinal stenosis all increase with age. In light of this, it is difficult to understand why the prevalence of back pain would decrease with increasing age. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at summarising the scientific evidence on the trends of back pain prevalence with age. METHODS: Population-based studies reporting the prevalence of back pain, including people aged 65 years and over, were systematically retrieved from several bibliographic databases. These were read and assessed by two reviewers, and papers retained ('good quality studies') were aggregated according to specific criteria. RESULTS: Good quality studies showed a large heterogeneity as to their methods and prevalence figures. No specific patterns were detected by country nor outcome measure. However, most studies that considered severe forms of back pain found an increase of prevalence with increasing age. The curvilinear association between age and back pain prevalence that is widely mentioned in the literature was found only for benign and mixed problems. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence concerning the association of back pain prevalence with age is more sparse than currently believed and this association seems to be modified by the severity of the problem. This knowledge could have important public health implications, as the proportion of older people will increase considerably in the coming years in most industrialised societies.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2005

Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a common problem that has only modestly effective treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether yoga is more effective than conventional therapeutic exercise or a self-care book for patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A nonprofit, integrated health care system. PATIENTS: 101 adults with chronic low back pain. INTERVENTION: 12-week sessions of yoga or conventional therapeutic exercise classes or a self-care book. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were back-related functional status (modified 24-point Roland Disability Scale) and "bothersomeness" of pain (11-point numerical scale). The primary time point was 12 weeks. Clinically significant change was considered to be 2.5 points on the functional status scale and 1.5 points on the bothersomeness scale. Secondary outcomes were days of restricted activity, general health status, and medication use. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline values, back-related function in the yoga group was superior to the book and exercise groups at 12 weeks (yoga vs. book: mean difference, -3.4 [95% CI, -5.1 to - 1.6] [P < 0.001]; yoga vs. exercise: mean difference, -1.8 [CI, -3.5 to - 0.1] [P = 0.034]). No significant differences in symptom bothersomeness were found between any 2 groups at 12 weeks; at 26 weeks, the yoga group was superior to the book group with respect to this measure (mean difference, -2.2 [CI, -3.2 to - 1.2]; P < 0.001). At 26 weeks, back-related function in the yoga group was superior to the book group (mean difference, -3.6 [CI, -5.4 to - 1.8]; P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Participants in this study were followed for only 26 weeks after randomization. Only 1 instructor delivered each intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Yoga was more effective than a self-care book for improving function and reducing chronic low back pain, and the benefits persisted for at least several months.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies.

Back pain is very common. Rarely, it may be the first manifestation of cancer. Although many advocate selective use of laboratory and x-ray tests for back pain patients, the early detection of cancer may be an important reason to obtain such tests. To develop a diagnostic approach that would identify malignancies while remaining parsimonious, the authors evaluated 1,975 walk-in patients with a chief complaint of back pain. Thirteen patients (0.66%) proved to have underlying cancer. Findings significantly associated with underlying cancer (p less than 0.05) were: age greater than or equal to 50 years, previous history of cancer, duration of pain greater than 1 month, failure to improve with conservative therapy, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and anemia. Combining historical features and ESR results led to an algorithm that would have limited x-ray utilization to just 22% of subjects while recommending an x-ray for every cancer patient. It would further suggest which patients with negative x-ray findings require further work-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Exercise has long been a standard of treatment for back pain. Over the last 2 decades, the use of intense, non-pain-contingent exercises for treatment of chronic back pain has received increased advocacy. The main goals of these treatments are to improve functioning of painful lumbar soft tissue and to decrease the fears and concerns of patients about using their backs for daily activities. The methodology of an aggressive quota-based exercise approach to back pain is outlined in this article. This approach relies on objective quantification of physical capabilities, treatment directed at altering these parameters, and repeat quantification for determination of treatment efficacy and positive feedback. By eliminating impairments in back function, altering fears and beliefs about pain, and reducing disability, patients with chronic low back pain can achieve meaningful improvements in their quality of life.

Behavior Therapy↗
PubMed1990

A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain.

A number of treatments are widely prescribed for chronic back pain, but few have been rigorously evaluated. We examined the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), a program of stretching exercises, or a combination of both for low back pain. Patients with chronic low back pain (median duration, 4.1 years) were randomly assigned to receive daily treatment with TENS (n = 36), sham TENS (n = 36), TENS plus a program of exercises (n = 37), or sham TENS plus exercises (n = 36). After one month no clinically or statistically significant treatment effect of TENS was found on any of 11 indicators of outcome measuring pain, function, and back flexion; there was no interactive effect of TENS with exercise. Overall improvement in pain indicators was 47 percent with TENS and 42 percent with sham TENS (P not significant). The 95 percent confidence intervals for group differences excluded a major clinical benefit of TENS for most outcomes. By contrast, after one month patients in the exercise groups had significant improvement in self-rated pain scores, reduction in the frequency of pain, and greater levels of activity as compared with patients in the groups that did not exercise. The mean reported improvement in pain scores was 52 percent in the exercise groups and 37 percent in the nonexercise groups (P = 0.02). Two months after the active intervention, however, most patients had discontinued the exercises, and the initial improvements were gone. We conclude that for patients with chronic low back pain, treatment with TENS is no more effective than treatment with a placebo, and TENS adds no apparent benefit to that of exercise alone.

Back Pain↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of economic and social reward in patients with chronic nonmalignant back pain.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic nonmalignant back pain are often exposed to multiple sources of economic and social reward. At issue in the present study was whether these rewards are 1) correlated with similar or dissimilar outcome variables and 2) able to account for unique variance in regression models of illness behavior. METHODS: A 2 x 2 factorial design was used in which patients were retrospectively assigned to one of four independent groups: low economic/low social reward, low economic/high social reward, high economic/low social reward, and high economic/high social reward. Of 265 consecutive patients enrolled at a tertiary pain service, 75 met eligibility criteria and had chronic nonmalignant back pain. RESULTS: Preexisting differences in health status were not associated with differences in illness behavior or pain ratings. With social reward held constant, patients in the high economic reward group missed more days from work (p < .005), had more domestic disability (p < .05), and were more depressed (p < .05) than patients in the low economic reward group. With economic reward held constant, patients in the high social reward group missed more days from work (p < .05), had more domestic disability (p < .01), and were more depressed (p < .01) than patients in the low social reward group. Unlike patients in the high economic reward group, however, patients in the high social reward group had higher levels of pain (p < .05) and more nonspecific medical complaints (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Economic and social rewards were both associated with increased disability and depression, but only social rewards were associated with increased symptom reporting. Exposure to economic and social rewards may account for unique variance in illness behavior that cannot be explained by differences in medical diagnosis, symptom duration, pain intensity, depression, or somatization.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Back pain in osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who have and do not have back pain, and evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and consequences of back pain among knee OA patients. METHODS: During a 3-year period, consecutive patients attending an outpatient rheumatology clinic were evaluated for the presence of back pain, and 368 were found to have OA of the knee. Clinical status was evaluated by the Clinical Health Assessment Questionnaire, radiographs, and joint examinations. RESULTS: Back pain was present in 54.6% of patients with OA of the knee. Almost every clinical status measure was worse among those reporting back pain, including Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability, pain, global severity, fatigue, and psychological status. Back pain was more common in women and the obese, but was not associated with age, marital status, formal education, smoking history, or knee radiographic scores. In multivariate analyses the strongest correlates of back pain in knee OA patients were anxiety, night pain, HAQ disability, and global severity. CONCLUSION: Back pain is prevalent among OA clinic patients, more common than in rheumatoid arthritis or population studies, is linked to body mass index, and is associated with clinically significant increases in pain and other measures of clinical distress.

Aged↗