Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Work Capacity Evaluation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 937 records · Page 52Linked to original sources

Determining impairment following spinal cord injury.

Determining the level of impairment and disability of an individual with SCI is reasonably straightforward. An impairment rating may be determined by either analyzing the impact of the SCI on various bodily systems or by considering the injury as a more global diagnostic category. Functional abilities based on level of neurologic preservation are well recognized. Although secondary medical complications, which may affect both impairment and disability, can arise at any time after SCI, neurologic and functional abilities are overwhelmingly stabilized by 12 months postinjury. A comprehensive history and physical examination should allow even the inexperienced examiner to obtain a valid determination of impairment after SCI. Although a more functionally oriented and perhaps interdisciplinary evaluation is needed to assess disability, it is also fairly straightforward. On the other hand, an evaluation of handicap is a more challenging undertaking, requiring a more detailed knowledge of the field of vocational rehabilitation.

Adult↗

Occupational stress: risk assessment and fitness for work.

The multidimensional and multifaceted aspects of the problem render the role and activity of the Occupational Health Physician (OHP) extremely complex and delicate, as both appraisal and implications cover a number of different domains (psychology, physiology, sociology, economy, work organisation and law), both in terms of risk assessment and stress evaluation, at collective and individual level. In this context, it is not only important to quantify the "external" work load, but mainly the individual "response", which in most cases is the crucial factor of the imbalance. that is, risk assessment has to be made more in "relative" terms rather than according to "absolute" criteria, and not only from the perspective of medical surveillance, but above all from that of risk prevention. When a health disability potentially connected to stress has to be assessed, there are three steps: a) stress exposure must be clearly assessed, both directly and indirectly; b) disease must be clearly identified; c) the biological plausibility of the relationship between stress and disease must be carefully checked, taking into account that stress disorders are typically psychosomatic and multi-causal. Consequently, cooperation with a psychologist and an accurate psycho-diagnostic approach are necessary, as well as consultation with other specialists and pertinent laboratory and instrumental tests.

Disability Evaluation↗