Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 937 records · Page 52Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Arch-first technique used with commercial T-graft to treat subacute type-A aortic dissection in patient with Marfan syndrome.

Staged repair of extensive thoracic aortic aneurysms puts certain patients at risk of rupture. We report the case of a patient with Marfan syndrome who presented with subacute type-A aortic dissection and a large descending aortic aneurysm. We used the arch-first technique with a commercially available Dacron T-graft. A clamshell incision was used for exposure. A button of arch vessels was anastomosed to the T-graft. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was established through the side branch. The distal end of the graft was anastomosed to the descending aorta and the proximal end to a composite graft. The duration of cerebral ischemia was 30 minutes; antegrade cerebral perfusion lasted 52 minutes. The patient experienced no neurologic dysfunction and was discharged with no major deficit. This technique shortens brain-ischemia time and is a good option if the risk of rupture of the descending component of an extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm is high. To the best of our knowledge, this is the 1st reported case in which the arch-first technique has been used with a commercially available T-graft to treat subacute type-A aortic dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Different remodeling of descending thoracic aorta after acute event in aortic intramural hemorrhage versus aortic dissection.

The natural healing process of medically treated aortic dissection (AD) and aortic intramural hemorrhage (AIH) developed in the descending thoracic aorta was compared to test the hypothesis that absence of intimal tear and flow communication in AIH may have different impact on the remodeling of the affected aorta after the acute event. In 25 patients with AD and 20 with AIH involving distal descending thoracic aorta stabilized with medical treatment, follow-up (mean 9 months) transesophageal echocardiography was performed to measure the maximal dimensions of aorta, true lumen, false lumen in AD, and abnormal wall thickening in AIH. The sex ratio, prevalence of hypertension, baseline maximal dimension, and longitudinal extent of the affected aorta did not show any significant difference in both groups. Patients with AIH were older than those with AD (63 +/- 10 vs 50 +/- 9, p <0.01). Disappearance of abnormal wall thickening with complete restoration of the aorta occurred in 70% (14 of 20) patients with AIH, which was significantly more frequent than in AD (8%, p <0.01). In AD, progressive dilatation of the aorta with continuous flow communication in the false lumen resulted in larger dimension of the aorta than in AIH (44 +/- 13 vs 35 +/- 7 mm, p <0.01). Absence of persistent flow communication resulted in a favorable remodeling process in AIH affecting distal descending aorta. This finding, along with different mean age in AIH and AD, may suggest that AIH is not just a precursor of overt AD but a distinct disease entity with different pathophysiology.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1983

Diagnosis of acute aortic dissection by M-mode and cross-sectional echocardiography: a five-year experience.

During a five-year period, 26 cases of acute thoracic aortic dissection were studied by M-mode and cross-sectional echocardiography prior to cardiac catheterization and aortography. The diagnosis could be made non-invasively in 20 patients. Important information concerning the extent of the dissection, and the presence or absence of aortic regurgitation or a pericardial effusion could be obtained. Negative examinations were largely confined to cases where the distal thoracic aorta alone was involved. In a further 30 cases admitted to the coronary care unit during this period in which echocardiography was performed to rule out aortic dissection, two false-positive examinations led to aortography which demonstrated aortic dilatation and aortic regurgitation only. In the remaining 28 cases, echocardiographic examination was negative and none of these patients subsequently evidenced aortic dissection. Echocardiography using both M-mode and cross-sectional techniques is a rapid and highly effective method of making an early diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection. Cross-sectional echocardiography is complementary to the M-mode technique, enhancing diagnostic accuracy by improving structural recognition in a condition where the normal anatomy is often severely distorted.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Usefulness of pulse deficit to predict in-hospital complications and mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Vascular compromise seen with pulse deficits is common in patients with type A dissection. However, patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes associated with pulse deficits have not been evaluated. Accordingly, we studied 513 patients (mean age 62 +/- 14 years, 65% men) with acute type A aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Pulse deficits, defined as decreased or absent carotid or peripheral pulses as noted by clinicians and later confirmed by diagnostic imaging, at surgery or at autopsy were noted in 154 patients (30%). Age <70 years, male gender, neurologic deficit(s), altered mental status, and hypotension, shock, or tamponade on admission were all significantly higher in patients with than without pulse deficits. The etiology of aortic dissection, clinical symptoms, and imaging findings were similar in the 2 groups. In-hospital complications (hypotension, coma, renal failure, and limb ischemia) and mortality (41% vs 25%, p = 0.0002) were significantly higher in patients with pulse deficit. Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis identified pulse deficit as an independent predictor of 5-day in-hospital mortality (risk ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 4.4; p <0.0001). Further, overall mortality rates increased with an increasing number of pulse deficits (p for trend <0.0001). Pulse deficits are common findings in patients with type A aortic dissection and identify those at high risk of in-hospital adverse events. This simple clinical sign should direct physicians to consider a diagnosis of aortic dissection in patients with acute chest pain, and should help identify a subgroup of patients who would benefit from more aggressive strategies.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

[Aortic dissection (DeBakey type I) associated with pseudoaneurysm 21 years after aortic valve replacement; report of a case].

We report a case of 63-year-old male who suffered from aortic dissection associated with pseudoaneurysm 21 years after aortic valve replacement. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan and aortography revealed DeBakey type I dissecting aneurysm with maximum diameter of 70 mm on ascending aorta and calcified pseudoaneurysm at previous aortotomy. He underwent modified Bentall procedure preserving previous mechanical valve and total aortic arch replacement with elephant trunk technique. Postoperative course was uneventful.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1997

Surgical repair of type-A aortic dissection: early and late results in 32 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute type-A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency. One unit's experience in the surgical repair of type-A aortic dissection is documented. METHODS: Surgical treatment was undertaken for type-A aortic dissection in 32 consecutive patients between January 1988 and August 1994 at Royal North Shore Hospital. Retrosternal chest pain was the commonest presenting symptom and in four of these cases it was initially misinterpreted as myocardial ischaemia. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients had signs of aortic incompetence on presentation. Computed tomography (CT) scanning was the commonest modality of definitive diagnosis, but trans-oesophageal echocardiography was used as confirmation wherever possible, and we now consider it the initial, best investigation whenever a diagnosis of dissection is considered. There were 15 supra-coronary ascending aortic replacements, and a further four with aortic valve re-suspension. There were 13 operations of the Bentall's type. The overall 30-day mortality was 19%. The late mortality was 19%, with 62% long-term survival at a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and surgical intervention can give excellent palliation and improved life expectancy in acute type-A aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Should the "elephant trunk" be skeletonized? Total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: To eliminate the residual false lumen in the descending thoracic aorta and improve long-term outcomes of surgical intervention for Stanford type A aortic dissection, we performed the skeletonized "elephant trunk" procedure in the ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement combined with transaortic stented graft implantation into the descending aorta for both acute and chronic type A aortic dissection, and the short-term results were compared. METHODS: Between April 2003 and November 2004, 60 consecutive patients (mean age, 53 +/- 16.7; approximate range, 28-78 years) with acute (n = 36) or chronic (n = 24) type A aortic dissection underwent this procedure. Right axillary artery cannulation was used for cardiopulmonary bypass and selected cerebral perfusion. The stented graft, a 10-cm-long woven Dacron graft with a self-expandable stent, was implanted through the aortic arch during hypothermic circulatory arrest. Enhanced electric beam computed tomography was performed in each patient before discharge, 3 months after the operation, and once each year thereafter to evaluate the postoperative time course of the residual false lumen. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 166 +/- 38 minutes, and average selective cerebral perfusion and lower body arrest time was 30 +/- 15 minutes. The in-hospital mortality was 3.3% (2/60). Thrombus obliteration of the residual false lumen in the descending thoracic aorta was observed in 92% and 85% of the acute and chronic aortic dissections, respectively, 3 months postoperatively. There was no late death during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The skeletonized elephant trunk procedure is an effective way of closing the residual false lumen of the descending aorta and might contribute to better long-term outcomes for both acute and chronic type A aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

[Aortic dissection with giant pseudoaneurysm as a rare late complication of aortic valve replacement--a case report].

A 60-year-old man who had received aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation at 47 years of age developed sudden syncope and shock on Mar. 28, 1991. Close examination including CT scan and aortography revealed DeBakey type I aortic dissection with giant pseudoaneurysm which compressed superior vena cava and right pulmonary artery and caused superior vena cava syndrome. He underwent elective ascending aortic replacement under profound hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest on Jun. 17, 1991. The giant pseudoaneurysm was present posterolaterally to the ascending aorta. It communicated with the false lumen and contained massive thrombi. The intimal tear of the ascending aorta existed along the suture line of previous aortotomy.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2000

Surgical results of Stanford type B aortic dissection. Comparisons between partial and subtotal replacement of the dissected aorta.

BACKGROUND: Surgical results for Stanford type B aortic dissection were retrospectively compared between the subtotal prosthetic replacement of the thoracoabdominal dissected aorta (STR) and partial replacement of the descending aorta at the intimal tear (PR). METHODS: Twenty-two patients (11 males and 11 females with mean age of 56.9+/-2.6 years) undergoing repair of aneurysms were analyzed. All operations were performed with the aid of femorofemoral partial cardiopulmonary bypass. Reconstruction of the critical artery for spinal cord blood supply was determined by evoked spinal cord potential (ESP) monitoring in non-urgent cases. Operative mortality and incidence of complications were compared between the PR group (Group I; n=15) and the STR group (Group II; n=7). RESULTS: There were one operative death and one late death in Group I. No early or late deaths occurred in Group II. Postoperative paraplegia occurred in 1 patient in Group I and 2 patients in Group II. Among patients undergoing selective reconstruction of the critical intercostal arteries, paraplegia occurred in only one patient. Incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between Group I and Group II. Presence of rupture (p<0.001) and development of acute renal failure (p<0.05) revealed significant determinants of postoperative mortality by multivariate analysis. Operative procedure did not influence postoperative mortality or occurrence of paraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: Operative results of STR with selective reconstruction of the critical arteries and PR for aortic dissection were comparable. Subtotal replacement of the thoracoabdominal dissected aorta is encouraged to apply for patients with diffuse, large postdissection aneurysms or those with a high risk of future enlargement of remaining false channels such as Marfan syndrome, under adequate reconstruction of the critical segmental arteries.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1996

Detecting acute thoracic aortic dissection in the emergency department: time constraints and choice of the optimal diagnostic test.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic strategies for the emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute thoracic aortic dissection and to measure the effect of delays related to the availability of these tests on the selection of the most appropriate one. METHODS: We carried out a decision analysis representing the risks of performing one or two sequential tests, the tests' accuracy, the risks and benefits of treatment, and the time-dependent mortality rate in untreated patients with dissection (1%/hour). Data were drawn from a Medline search. Our subjects were patients who presented to the emergency department with chest pain in whom acute thoracic aortic dissection was suspected. For different clinical probabilities of aortic dissection, we compared the risks and benefits of testing using the following procedures (alone and in combinations): aortography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and both transesophageal (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We then measured the effect of delays in these tests on the selection of the appropriate procedure. The outcome studied was 30-day survival. RESULTS: We determined that the "threshold" clinical probability of aortic dissection above which the benefits of testing outweigh its risks is low. It ranges from 2% with the most reliable procedure (MRI) to 9% with the least (TTE). At low probability of dissection (< 15%), the accuracy of all tests except TTE is sufficient to rule out dissection. Delays have negligible effect on these results. When the likelihood of dissection is higher, the preferred option is to order a second diagnostic test if the results of the first are negative. The threshold probabilities above which to order a second test range from 15% (CT, then aortography) to 35% (MRI, then aortography). Excessive delays may affect the selection of tests when the likelihood of dissection is high (eg, 50%). Thus, although it is less accurate, a CT scan obtained within 2 hours or a TEE obtained within 6 hours of presentation to the ED yields a higher survival rate than an MRI obtained within 9 hours. Similarly, the benefits of ordering a second test, if the result of the first are negative, outweigh the risks only if the delay in obtaining the test does not exceed 10 hours. CONCLUSION: All patients in whom aortic dissection is suspected, even if the index of suspicion is very low, should undergo one of the available diagnostic procedures (except TTE). A patient with a moderate to high probability of disease should undergo a second investigation if the findings of the first are negative. When the probability of dissection is high, the physician must consider delays in obtaining specific diagnostic tests and order those that will be the most quickly available.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2006

Surgery for acute type a aortic dissection a 37-year experience in Green Lane Hospital.

PURPOSE: To review the management of patients with acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between June 1967 and December 2003, 246 patients (151 males and 95 females, 20-82 years; median 59 years) underwent operation for type A dissection. Early mortality and aortic dissection-related late events (reoperation and death related to aortic dissection) were assessed and correlated with the surgical approach. RESULTS: Over 37 years, early mortality has markedly improved, 50% in 1970s, 22% in 1980s, 17% in 1990s, and 11% after 2000. However, late deaths occurred at a constant rate, overall late survival at 10 and 20 years were 59% and 9%, respectively, and this did not improve after the 1990s. Preoperative hemodynamic instability, myocardial and kidney malperfusion, smoking history, prolonged bypass and cross-clamp time, and year of surgery were found to be risk factors for early death. The main cause (21%) of late deaths was aortic dissection-related events, especially in the distal aorta. However, no intraoperative risk factors were found to be predictive of late dissection-related events. Surgical techniques including complete resection of the intimal tear or distal extent of the surgery had no impact on late distal event-free survival. CONCLUSION: Despite improvement of short-term outcome over 37 years, patients who had aortic dissection are still living with elevated risk of death. Although late events in the distal aorta were a major risk, aggressive surgical approaches did not improve these outcomes. Vigilant follow-up is necessary for these patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Acute spontaneous infrarenal aortic dissection.

An acute spontaneous rupture of an aortic dissection originating in and limited to the infrarenal aorta associated with an infrarenal aortic aneurysm is reported. The diagnosis was made by ultrasonography and computed tomography and was confirmed intraoperatively followed by a successful graft insertion.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Midterm results of stent-graft repair of acute and chronic aortic dissection with descending tear: the complication-specific approach.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular stent-graft placement for the treatment of patients with aortic dissection is emerging as an attractive alternative to conventional cardiac operations. However, there has been no report of longer-term follow-up. The purpose of this study is to describe our midterm results with endovascular stent-graft repair for the treatment of patients with aortic dissections. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with aortic dissections with descending tears were treated with endovascular stent-grafting. Ten patients had acute type A, 14 patients had acute type B, and 14 patients had chronic type B dissection. Stent grafts fabricated from expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered Z stents were placed to close entry tears in all patients through the delivery systems introduced from the femoral or the iliac arteries. RESULTS: Two patients with complicated acute type B dissection, who would have required surgical intervention, died within 30 days of the procedure, although no other patients died within the same period. There were no late deaths during the mean follow-up period of 27 months. Early and late complication rates were 33% and 36%, respectively, in patients with acute dissection, whereas rates were 4% and 0% (P <.05 vs patients with acute dissection) in patients with chronic dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Entry closure with endovascular stent-graft placement may be a safe and effective method for the treatment of patients with aortic dissection. It could be an alternative to conventional surgical intervention in selected patients with chronic dissection. However, strict patient selection and close follow-up seem mandatory in patients with acute dissection receiving Z stent-based stent-grafts. Stent-graft repair should be delayed for acute type B dissection without complications.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

[Aortic dissection--when operative treatment, when endoluminal therapy?].

GOAL: To demonstrate the Heidelberg results of the previous 2 years in patients referred for acute aortic dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 93 patients referred for acute aortic dissection were treated by cardiac surgery, vascular surgery and interventional radiology according to a novel therapeutic algorithm including stent-grafts and combined open and interventional procedures and conservative medical therapy when no malperfusion syndrome was present or patients were considered prohibitive for even minor surgical procedures. Stent-graft placements were done assisted by short term cardiac arrest to facilitate correct device deployment. RESULTS: 36 patients presented with type A and the other 57 with type B dissection. 32 of the A patients were operated and 20 of the B patients, respectively. 12 patients with B dissection were treated with stent-grafts. 3 required additional interventional therapy for organ malperfusion. The mortality was 0% in these 12 patients The overall mortality rate in the A group was close to 40% mainly as a result of postoperative organ malperfusion while it was 15% in the B group. In both groups mortality was highest in the respective untreated patient subgroup (3/4 and 8/37, respectively). The main mortality factor was visceral (mesenteric or liver) ischemia. Paraplegic complications occured in neither group. In 4 patients a combined approach applying cardiac surgery of the ascending aorta and endluminal stent-graft placement for the residual B dissection was successfully performed. In one patient this was done simultaneously. DISCUSSION: Acute aortic dissection of type A with or without valve involvement, coronary artery ischemia can be treated with high technical success rates. However, remaining distal aortic dissection associated with true lumen collapse and organ malperfusion is the main causative factor for clinical failures. Successful combination of open proximal aortic surgery with endoluminal treatment of residual B dissection encourages further use of this novel approach. Acute B type dissection appears to be effectively and safely treated by endoluminal approach in selected cases. Unsolved questions of this less invasive therapeutic approach focus mainly on the design of the proximal anchoring part of the devices.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1990

Thoracic aortic aneurysms after acute type A aortic dissection: necessity for follow-up.

Between April 1979 and May 1989, 86 patients underwent emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection. Sixty-four (74.4%) survived. None of the survivors died of late aortic complications. Fifty-eight patients were followed 3 months to 10 years (mean follow-up, 3.2 years) postoperatively with computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography. Dilatation of the distal aorta (diameter size range, 6 to 10.5 cm) developed in 10 patients (17%). Six patients underwent replacement of the descending aorta 1 month to 21 months (mean period, 8.5 months) after aortic dissection repair. Two of them had third-stage thoracoabdominal replacement. In 2 patients, replacement of the descending aorta was scheduled; 1 died before reoperation and 1 refused the procedure. Two patients underwent aortic arch replacement; it is scheduled for another (fourth stage). There were no deaths among the patients having reoperation. The rate of indications for reoperation on the aorta downstream from the original repair 1 month to 6 years 4 months (median time, 9 months) after primary surgical intervention for acute type A aortic dissection was 24% (14 reoperations in 10 of 58 patients). This study underscores the importance of close follow-up of patients having operation for acute type A aortic dissection. Early recognition of progressive downstream aortic pathology permits effective prevention of aortic rupture and timely reoperation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Short-term results of leaving elephant trunk in type A aortic dissection].

Elephant trunk prosthesis was devised for treatment of multiple aortic aneurysm. But it has applied to type A aortic dissection. Because residual false lumen often dilates gradually and come to have the risk of rupture. Two patients who were diagnosed as type A aortic dissection were performed total aortic arch replacement with Elephant trunk prosthesis on distal anastmosis. Postoperative diagnostic images showed that residual false lumen of proximal descending aorta were thrombosed. Now it is not necessary to perform next extensive aortic replacement. Complication which is threatened in using Elephant trunk prosthesis, paraplegia, thromboembolism, kinking of prosthesis could have been avoided by setting suitable length and diameter of the prosthesis.

Aortic Dissection↗