Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “transcript”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

PhoP-P and RNA polymerase sigmaA holoenzyme are sufficient for transcription of Pho regulon promoters in Bacillus subtilis: PhoP-P activator sites within the coding region stimulate transcription in vitro.

The Bacillus subtilis pstS operon and phoA gene are members of the Pho regulon that is controlled by PhoR, a histidine kinase, and PhoP, a response regulator. Footprinting analysis showed that phosphorylated PhoP extended the PhoP protected region in pstS and phoA promoters, and also bound to a separate site within the coding region of each gene. Our previous in vivo studies have shown that, in contrast to other Pho regulon promoters that are not expressed in either phoP or phoR mutants, a low-level induction from the pstS promoter (25% of parent strain) can be detected in a phoR mutant. In this study, by using an in vitro transcription system, we demonstrate that (i) only phosphorylated PhoP is a transcriptional activator of the pstS operon and of the phoA gene; (ii) phosphorylated PhoP and RNA polymerase sigmaA holoenzyme are sufficient for in vitro transcription of the pstS promoter and the phoA promoter; (iii) the activation of the pstS promoter requires lower concentrations of phosphorylated PhoP than does the phoA promoter for transcription; and (iv) PhoP binding sites in both the pstS promoter core binding region and in the 5' coding region of the gene, which have been identified by footprinting analysis, are important for the transcription of the pstS promoter in vitro.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed2000

Suppression of FNR-dependent transcription activation at the Escherichia coli nir promoter by Fis, IHF and H-NS: modulation of transcription initiation by a complex nucleo-protein assembly.

Expression from the Escherichia coli nir promoter is co-dependent on both the FNR protein (an anaerobically triggered transcription activator) and the NarL or NarP proteins (transcription activators triggered by nitrite and nitrate). Under anaerobic conditions, FNR binds to a site centred between positions -41 and -42, activating transcription of the nir operon. In previous work, we showed that this activation is suppressed by the binding of Fis protein, and at least one other protein, to sequence elements located upstream of the nir promoter. We proposed that the binding of NarL or NarP to a site centred between positions -69 and -70 counteracts this suppression, resulting in increased transcription in response to nitrite or nitrate. Here we have further investigated the different proteins that downregulate the nir promoter. We show that the nir promoter is repressed by three DNA binding proteins, Fis, IHF and H-NS. We demonstrate that, in addition to binding to its previously characterized upstream site located at position -142, Fis also binds to a second downstream site located at position +23. A second suppressing factor is IHF, that binds to a site located at position -88. Finally, the nucleoid associated protein, H-NS, preferentially binds to upstream sequences at the nir promoter and represses promoter activity. The association of Fis, IHF and H-NS suggests that nir promoter DNA is sequestrated into a highly ordered nucleo-protein structure that represses FNR-dependent transcription activation. NarL and NarP can relieve both IHF- and Fis-mediated repression, but are unable to counteract H-NS-mediated repression.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 phosphorylates signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and regulates its transcriptional activity.

The activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) depends on the association with one of its activators, p35 and p39, which are prominently expressed in the nervous system. Studies on the repertoire of protein substrates for Cdk5 have implicated the involvement of Cdk5 in neuronal migration and synaptic plasticity. Our recent analysis of the sequence of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3, a key transcription factor, reveals the presence of potential Cdk5 phosphorylation site. We report here that the Cdk5/p35 complex associates with STAT3 and phosphorylates STAT3 on the Ser-727 residue in vitro and in vivo. Intriguingly, whereas the Ser phosphorylation of STAT3 can be detected in embryonic and postnatal brain and muscle of wild-type mice, it is essentially absent from those of Cdk5-deficient embryos. In addition, treatment of cultured myotubes with neuregulin enhances the Ser phosphorylation of STAT3 and transcription of STAT3 target genes, such as c-fos and junB, in a Cdk5-dependent manner. Both the DNA-binding activity of STAT3 and the transcription of specific target genes, such as fibronectin, are reduced in Cdk5-deficient muscle. Taken together, these results reveal a physiological role of Cdk5 in regulating STAT3 phosphorylation and modulating its transcriptional activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Blue light-induced transcription of plastid-encoded psbD gene is mediated by a nuclear-encoded transcription initiation factor, AtSig5.

Light is one of the most important environmental factors regulating expression of photosynthesis genes. The plastid psbD gene encoding the photosystem II reaction center protein D2 is under the control of a unique blue light responsive promoter (BLRP) that is transcribed by a bacterial-type plastid RNA polymerase (PEP). Promoter recognition of PEP is mediated by one of the six nuclear-encoded sigma factors in Arabidopsis. The replacement of the plastid sigma factor associated with PEP may be the major mechanism for switching of plastid transcription pattern in response to environmental and developmental signals. This study demonstrates that AtSig5 is a unique sigma factor that is essential for psbD BLRP activity. A T-DNA insertional mutant with reduced AtSIG5 expression resulted in loss of primary transcripts from the psbD BLRP. Furthermore, transient overexpression of AtSig5 in dark-adapted protoplasts specifically elevated psbD and psbA transcription activities. On the other hand, overproduction of AtSig2 enhanced the transcription of psbA gene and trnE operon, but not psbD transcription. The AtSIG5 gene is phylogenetically distinct from other plastid sigma factors, and its expression is induced exclusively by blue light. We propose that AtSig5 acts as a mediator of blue light signaling that specifically activates the psbD BLRP in response to blue light in Arabidopsis.

Arabidopsis↗
PubMed2005

Occupancy of the Drosophila hsp70 promoter by a subset of basal transcription factors diminishes upon transcriptional activation.

The presence of general transcription factors and other coactivators at the Drosophila hsp70 gene promoter in vivo has been examined by polytene chromosome immunofluorescence and chromatin immunoprecipitation at endogenous heat-shock loci or at a hsp70 promoter-containing transgene. These studies indicate that the hsp70 promoter is already occupied by TATA-binding protein (TBP) and several TBP-associated factors (TAFs), TFIIB, TFIIF (RAP30), TFIIH (XPB), TBP-free/TAF-containg complex (GCN5 and TRRAP), and the Mediator complex subunit 13 before heat shock. After heat shock, there is a significant recruitment of the heat-shock transcription factor, RNA polymerase II, XPD, GCN5, TRRAP, or Mediator complex 13 to the hsp70 promoter. Surprisingly, upon heat shock, there is a marked diminution in the occupancy of TBP, six different TAFs, TFIIB, and TFIIF, whereas there is no change in the occupancy of these factors at ecdysone-induced loci under the same conditions. Hence, these findings reveal a distinct mechanism of transcriptional induction at the hsp70 promoters, and further indicate that the apparent promoter occupancy of the general transcriptional factors does not necessarily reflect the transcriptional state of a gene.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Differential regulation of oligodendrocyte markers by glucocorticoids: post-transcriptional regulation of both proteolipid protein and myelin basic protein and transcriptional regulation of glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase.

During neonatal development glucocorticoids potentiate oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelinogenesis by regulating the expression of myelin basic protein, proteolipid protein, and glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase (sn-glycerol-3-phosphate: NAD+ 2-oxidoreductase, EC 1.1.1.8). The actual locus at which hydrocortisone exerts its developmental influence on glial physiology is, however, not well understood. Glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase is glucocorticoid-inducible in oligodendrocytes at all stages of development both in vivo and in vitro. In newborn rat cerebral cultures, between 9 and 15 days in vitro, a 2- to 3-fold increase in myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein mRNA levels occurs in oligodendrocytes within 12 hr of hydrocortisone treatment. Immunostaining demonstrates that this increase in mRNAs is followed by a 2- to 3-fold increase in the protein levels within 24 hr. In vitro transcription assays performed with oligodendrocyte nuclei show an 11-fold increase in the transcriptional activity of glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase in response to hydrocortisone but no increase in transcription of myelin basic protein or proteolipid protein. These results indicate that during early myelinogenesis, glucocorticoids influence the expression of key oligodendroglial markers by different processes: The expression of glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase is regulated at the transcriptional level, whereas the expression of myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein is modulated via a different, yet uncharacterized, mechanism involving post-transcriptional regulation.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Evidence for a heat shock transcription factor-independent mechanism for heat shock induction of transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Transcription of the DNA damage-responsive gene, DDRA2, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated by heat shock treatment as well as by mutagen/carcinogen exposure. Deletion analysis of upstream noncoding sequence indicated that sequences between approximately -190 and -140 base pairs were necessary for heat shock and DNA damage regulation of transcription. Fusion of this region to a CYC1-lacZ reporter gene demonstrated that the sequence between -202 and -165 base pairs was sufficient for basal level and heat shock-induced expression. This DNA sequence was unable to bind heat shock transcription factor as judged by binding competition experiments in vitro. These results indicate that yeast possesses a second, heat shock transcription factor-independent mechanism for activating transcription in response to thermal stress.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

The different tissue transcription patterns of genes for HNF-1, C/EBP, HNF-3, and HNF-4, protein factors that govern liver-specific transcription.

The transcription factors that act in hepatocyte-specific gene expression include proteins that are present mainly in liver cells (HNF-1/LFB1, C/EBP, HNF-3, HNF-4) (HNF, hepatocyte nuclear factor; C/EBP, rat enhancer binding protein) and proteins that are widely distributed (AP-1, NF-1, NF-Y/ACF). We show here that the genes encoding each of these liver-enriched factors exhibit different patterns of transcriptional control in different tissues. In addition, there were several instances in which transcription was detected (e.g., for HNF-1) when no mRNA or specific DNA binding protein was found, suggesting the importance of posttranscriptional control in some instances for these factors. These experiments identify C/EBP, HNF-3, and HNF-4, and perhaps also HNF-1, as targets for the study of cascades of transcriptionally controlled transcription factors in differentiated cells.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Cisplatin inhibits chromatin remodeling, transcription factor binding, and transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in vivo.

The anticancer drug cis-diamminedichloro-platinum(II) (cisplatin) covalently modifies DNA, and these lesions are thought to lead to cell death by inhibiting DNA and RNA synthesis. By using in vivo analysis techniques, we have investigated the influence of cisplatin on hormone-induced transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. Cisplatin substantially reduced glucocorticoid-induced expression from the MMTV promoter stably incorporated into mouse tumor cells. The glucocorticoid-receptor-dependent chromatin remodeling and loading of transcription factors that is a signature response of this promoter in the context of chromatin were significantly reduced by cisplatin but not by the clinically ineffective trans-isomer trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (transplatin). Additional in vivo studies on transiently introduced nonchromatin MMTV templates demonstrated that cisplatin modification of DNA blocked binding of the transcription factor NF1. These results provide strong evidence that cisplatin influences transcription by interfering with the opening of repressive chromatin structures and by blocking transcription factor binding directly, each of which could contribute substantially to its toxicity.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Activated Ha-Ras but not TPA induces transcription through binding sites for activating transcription factor 3/Jun and a novel nuclear factor.

We report the identification of a 20-base pair sequence mediating induced transcription in response to an activated Ha-ras gene and epidermal growth factor (EGF) but not 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate stimulation. This signal-specific nuclear target is present in the long terminal repeat of a mouse VL30 retrotransposon expressed in epidermis. Functional studies and in vitro binding analyses using cultured keratinocytes (Balb/MK) reveal that the response element is composed of two cooperating sequence motifs in juxtaposed position, both of which are targets for induced binding activity 1-2 h after EGF stimulation. Of many different activating transcription factor/cAMP-responsive element binding protein/activating protein 1 factors tested, one part of the sequence selectively binds endogenous proteins immunologically related to activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and Jun isotypes. The other sequence is a target for a nuclear factor showing binding specificity unrelated to factors known to mediate EGF- or ras-induced transcription as determined by its sequence specificity and by antibody experiments. This component has been characterized and partially purified by gel filtration chromatography and velocity centrifugation revealing a Stokes radius of 43.6 A and a sedimentation coefficient of 9.7 S in solution. Based on these parameters, a molecular mass of 178,000 Da was calculated. The results indicate that the specific binding of ATF3/Jun and a previously uncharacterized factor account for signal-specific transcription in response to EGF or an activated Ha-ras gene in a cell type in which the cooperative action of an activated Ha-ras gene and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate cause tumor growth.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1996

Vitamin D receptors repress basal transcription and exert dominant negative activity on triiodothyronine-mediated transcriptional activity.

We have examined vitamin D receptor (VDR), thyroid hormone receptor (TR), and retinoid X receptor beta (RXR beta) binding to vitamin D response elements (VDREs), two thyroid hormone response elements (TREs) (DR4 and F2), and a retinoic acid response element (DR5). VDR/RXR bound well to the VDREs and to DR4 and DR5 using the electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Surprisingly, VDR/RXR also bound well to F2, which contains half-sites arranged as an inverted palindrome. In co-transfection experiments using CV-1 cells, we observed that VDR repressed basal transcription in the absence of ligand on DR3 and osteopontin VDREs and F2, but had no effect on DR4 or DR5. VDR selectively mediated ligand-dependent transcription on only VDREs. VDR also exhibited dominant negative activity as it blocked triiodothyronine (T3)-mediated transcriptional activity on DR4 and F2. These results demonstrate that VDR/RXR heterodimers can bind promiscuously to a wide range of hormone response elements, including inverted palindromes. Moreover, they show that unliganded VDRs, similar to TRs and retinoic acid receptors, can repress basal transcription. Last, they also suggest a novel repressor function of VDR on T3-mediated transcription which may be significant in tissues where VDR and TR are co-expressed.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Repression of cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 release by dexamethasone occurs by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms involving loss of polyadenylated mRNA.

The two cyclooxygenase (COX) isoforms convert arachidonic acid to precursor prostaglandins (PGs). Up-regulation of COX-2 is responsible for increased PG production in inflammation and is antagonized by corticosteriods such as dexamethasone. In human pulmonary A549 cells, interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) increases prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis via dexamethasone-sensitive induction of COX-2. Nuclear run-off assays showed that COX-2 transcription rate was repressed 25-40% by dexamethasone, while PGE2 release, COX activity, and COX-2 protein were totally repressed. At the mRNA level, complete repression of COX-2 was only observed at later (6 h) time points. Preinduced COX-2 mRNA was also potently repressed by dexamethasone, yet suppression of transcription by actinomycin D showed little effect. This dexamethasone-dependent repression involved a reduced COX-2 mRNA half-life, was blocked by actinomycin D or cycloheximide, and was antagonized by the steroid antagonist RU38486. Repression of IL-1beta-induced PGE2 release, COX activity, and COX-2 protein by actinomycin D was only effective within the first hour following IL-1beta treatment, while dexamethasone was effective when added up to 10 h later, suggesting a functional role for post-transcriptional mechanisms of repression. Following dexamethasone treatment, shortening of the average length of COX-2 mRNA poly(A) tails was observed. Finally, ligation of the COX-2 3'-UTR to a heterologous reporter failed to confer dexamethasone sensitivity. In conclusion, these data indicate a major role for post-transcriptional mechanisms in the dexamethasone-dependent repression of COX-2 that require de novo glucocorticoid receptor-dependent transcription and translation. This mechanism involves shortening of the COX-2 poly(A) tail and requires determinants other than just the 3'-UTR for specificity.

Cycloheximide↗
PubMed2002

Redox effector factor-1 regulates the activity of thyroid transcription factor 1 by controlling the redox state of the N transcriptional activation domain.

Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) is a homeodomain-containing transcriptional regulator responsible for the activation of thyroid- and lung-specific genes. It has been demonstrated that its DNA binding activity is redox-regulated in vitro through the formation of dimers and oligomeric species. In this paper, we demonstrate that the redox regulation mainly involves a Cys residue (Cys(87)), which resides out of the DNA binding domain, belonging to the N-transactivation domain. In fact, the oxidized form of a truncated TTF-1 (containing the N-transactivation domain and the DNA-binding domain, here called TTF-1N-HD) looses specific DNA binding activity. Since most of the oxidized TTF-1N-HD is in a monomeric form, these data indicate that the redox state of Cys(87) may control the DNA-binding function of the homeodomain, suggesting that Cys(87) could play an important role in determining the correct folding of the homeodomain. By using gel retardation and transient transfection assays, we demonstrate that the redox effector factor-1 (Ref-1) mediates the redox effects on TTF-1N-HD binding and that it is able to modulate the TTF-1 transcriptional activity. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down experiments demonstrate the occurrence of interaction between Ref-1 and TTF-1N-HD. Having previously demonstrated that Ref-1 is able to modulate the transcriptional activity of another thyroid-specific transcription factor (Pax-8), our data suggest that Ref-1 plays a central role in the regulation of thyroid cells.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Transcriptional regulation of the cytosolic chaperonin theta subunit gene, Cctq, by Ets domain transcription factors Elk-1, Sap-1a, and Net in the absence of serum response factor.

The chaperonin-containing t-complex polypeptide 1 (CCT) is a molecular chaperone that facilitates protein folding in eukaryotic cytosol, and the expression of CCT is highly dependent on cell growth. We show here that transcription of the gene encoding the theta subunit of mouse CCT, Cctq, is regulated by the ternary complex factors (TCFs), Elk-1, Sap-1a, and Net (Sap-2). Reporter gene assay using HeLa cells indicated that the Cctq gene promoter contains a cis-acting element of the CCGGAAGT sequence (CQE1) at -36 bp. The major CQE1-binding proteins in HeLa cell nuclear extract was recognized by anti-Elk-1 or anti-Sap-1a antibodies in electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and recombinant Elk-1, Sap-1a, or Net specifically recognized CQE1. The CQE1-dependent transcriptional activity in HeLa cells was virtually abolished by overexpression of the DNA binding domains of TCFs. Overexpression of full-length TCFs with Ras indicated that exogenous TCFs can regulate the CQE1-dependent transcription in a Ras-dependent manner. PD98059, an inhibitor of MAPK, significantly repressed the CQE1-dependent transcription. However, no serum response factor was detected by electrophoretic mobility shift assay using the CQE1 element. These results indicate that transcription of the Cctq gene is regulated by TCFs under the control of the Ras/MAPK pathway, probably independently of serum response factor.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Myeloid Elf-1-like factor, an ETS transcription factor, up-regulates lysozyme transcription in epithelial cells through interaction with promyelocytic leukemia protein.

Myeloid elf-1-like factor (MEF) or Elf4, which is a member of the ETS transcription factor family, up-regulates the basal expression of lysozyme gene in epithelial cells and is constitutively localized in the nucleus. The mammalian cell nucleus is organized into distinct nuclear domains or compartments that are essential for diverse physiological processes. Promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear body or nuclear domain 10 is one of the nuclear domains and is involved in tumor suppression and regulation of transcription. Here, we investigate the role of PML nuclear body in MEF transactivation. We show that PML, but not Sp100, induced the accumulation of MEF in PML nuclear bodies and that MEF and PML physically interacted. This interaction stimulated MEF transcriptional activity, resulting in the up-regulation of endogenous lysozyme expression. Amino acids 348-517 of MEF were required for the accumulation of MEF in PML nuclear bodies and up-regulation of lysozyme transcription, which is enhanced by PML. Moreover, the C-terminal region of MEF spanning amino acids 477-517 was the putative region required for interaction between MEF and PML as determined with the use of the mammalian two-hybrid system. In addition, heat-shock treatment induced the accumulation of MEF in endogenous PML nuclear bodies and enhanced MEF transactivation of lysozyme gene. Thus, the recruitment of MEF to PML nuclear bodies may partly regulate lysozyme transcription in epithelial cells.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Compensatory contributions of HEXIM1 and HEXIM2 in maintaining the balance of active and inactive positive transcription elongation factor b complexes for control of transcription.

Human positive transcriptional elongation factor b (P-TEFb), consisting of a cyclin-dependent kinase 9-cyclin T heterodimer, stimulates general and disease-specific transcriptional elongation by phosphorylating RNA polymerase II. The HEXIM1 protein, aided by the 7SK snRNA, sequesters P-TEFb into an inactive 7SK.HEXIM1.P-TEFb small nuclear ribonucleic acid particle for inhibition of transcription and, consequently, cell proliferation. Here we show that, like HEXIM1, a highly homologous protein named HEXIM2 also possesses the ability to inactivate P-TEFb to suppress transcription through a 7SK-mediated interaction with P-TEFb. Furthermore, HEXIM1 and HEXIM2 can form stable homo- and hetero-oligomers (most likely dimers), which may nucleate the formation of the 7SK small nuclear ribonucleic acid particle. Despite their similar functions, HEXIM1 and HEXIM2 exhibit distinct expression patterns in various human tissues and established cell lines. In HEXIM1-knocked down cells, HEXIM2 can functionally and quantitatively compensate for the loss of HEXIM1 to maintain a constant level of the 7SK/HEXIM-bound P-TEFb. Our results demonstrate that there is a tightly regulated cellular process to maintain the balance between active and inactive P-TEFb complexes, which controls global transcription as well as cell growth and differentiation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Erm/thyroid transcription factor 1 interactions modulate surfactant protein C transcription.

Expression of surfactant protein C (SP-C), which is restricted to alveolar type II epithelial cells of the adult lung, is critically dependent on thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1). In the present study we have demonstrated that Erm, a member of the Ets family of transcription factors, is expressed in the distal lung epithelium during development and is also restricted to alveolar type II cells in the adult. Erm was up-regulated by fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) in culture, and blocking FGF signaling inhibited Erm expression both in vivo and in vitro. The SP-C minimal promoter was found to contain two potential Ets binding sites, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that two 20-bp wild-type oligonucleotides containing the 5'-GGA(A/T)-3' Ets consensus binding motif were shifted by nuclear extracts from MLE15 cells. Co-transfection assays showed that Erm by itself had little effect on SP-C promoter activity but that Erm significantly enhanced TTF-1-mediated SP-C transcription. Mutation of one of the Ets binding sites reduced SP-C transcription to background levels, whereas mutation of the other site resulted in increased SP-C transcription. Protein-protein interactions between Erm and TTF-1 were demonstrated by mammalian two-hybrid assays and by co-immunoprecipitation assays. Mapping studies showed that the Ets domain of Erm and the combined N terminus and homeodomain of TTF-1 were critical for this interaction. Treatment of primary cultures of adult alveolar type II cells with siRNA targeting Erm diminished expression of both Erm and SP-C but had no effect on beta-actin or GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). Taken together, these results demonstrate that Erm is involved in SP-C regulation, which results from an interaction with TTF-1.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

CDCA4 is an E2F transcription factor family-induced nuclear factor that regulates E2F-dependent transcriptional activation and cell proliferation.

The TRIP-Br1/p34(SEI-1) family proteins participate in cell cycle progression by coactivating E2F1- or p53-dependent transcriptional activation. Here, we report the identification of human CDCA4 (also know as SEI-3/Hepp) as a novel target gene of transcription factor E2F and as a repressor of E2F-dependent transcriptional activation. Analysis of CDCA4 promoter constructs showed that an E2F-responsive sequence in the vicinity of the transcription initiation site is necessary for the E2F1-4-induced activation of CDCA4 gene transcription. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that E2F1 and E2F4 bound to an E2F-responsive sequence of the human CDCA4 gene. Like TRIP-Br1/p34(SEI-1) and TRIP-Br2 (SEI-2), the transactivation domain of CDCA4 was mapped within C-terminal acidic region 175-241. The transactivation function of the CDCA4 protein was inhibited by E2F1-4 and DP2, but not by E2F5-8. Inhibition of CDCA4 transactivation activity by E2F1 partially interfered with retinoblastoma protein overexpression. Conversely, CDCA4 suppressed E2F1-3-induced reporter activity. CDCA4 (but not acidic region-deleted CDCA4) suppressed E2F1-regulated gene promoter activity. These findings suggest that the CDCA4 protein functions as a suppressor at the E2F-responsive promoter. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of CDCA4 expression in cancer cells resulted in up-regulation of cell growth rates and DNA synthesis. The CDCA4 protein was detected in several human cells and was induced as cells entered the G1/S phase of the cell cycle. Taken together, our results suggest that CDCA4 participates in the regulation of cell proliferation, mainly through the E2F/retinoblastoma protein pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗