Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vision Screening”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Screening for glaucoma with a non-mydriatic fundus camera.

183 first-degree relatives of glaucoma patients were photographed by a technician with non-mydriatic fundus camera in order to study the suitability of wide angle black-and-white fundus photographs in screening for glaucoma. The success rate of photography was 92%. The optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities were evaluated from the photographs by an ophthalmologist. 31 subjects (17%) were referred to further ophthalmological examinations. We found 6 (3%) new glaucomas. In addition, in 6 patients (3%) retinal nerve fiber layer defect was the only abnormality, 5 subjects (3%) showed a hemorrhage and 2 eyes had collateral vessels as a sign of asymptomatic venous stasis change at the optic disc. Only 1 of the 6 (17%) patients with glaucoma would have been found with tonometry alone. The results of this study indicate that non-mydriatic retinal camera is a useful tool in screening for glaucoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism.

AIMS: To assess the reliability of the hand held automated refractor Retinomax in measuring astigmatism in non-cycloplegic conditions. To assess the accuracy of Retinomax in diagnosing abnormal astigmatism in non-cycloplegic refractive screening of children between 9 and 36 months. METHODS: Among 1205 children undergoing a non-cycloplegic refractive screening with Retinomax, 299 (25%) had repeated non-cycloplegic measurements, 302 (25%) were refracted under cycloplegia using the same refractor, and 88 (7%) using retinoscopy or an automated on table refractor. The reproducibility of non-cycloplegic cylinder measurement was assessed by comparing the cylindrical power and axis values in the 299 repeated measurements without cycloplegia. The influence of the quick mode on cylinder measurement was analysed by comparing the cylinder and axis value in 93 repeated measurements without cycloplegia where normal mode was used in one measurement and quick mode in the other. Predictive values of the refractive screening were calculated for three different thresholds of manifest astigmatism (> or = 1.5, > or = 1.75, and > or = 2 D) considering as a true positive case an astigmatism > or = 2 D under cycloplegic condition (measured by retinoscopy, on table, or hand held refractor). RESULTS: The 95% limits of agreement between two repeated manifest cylinder measurements with Retinomax attained levels slightly less than plus or minus 1 D. The 95% limits of agreement for the axis were plus or minus 46 degrees. The comparison of non-cycloplegic measurements in the quick and normal mode showed no significant difference and 95% limits of agreement plus or minus 0.75 D. The mean difference between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic cylinder values measured by Retinomax reached 0.17 D and was statistically significant. Manifest thresholds of > or = 1.5 D, > or = 1.75 D, > or = 2 D cylinder value diagnosed 2 D of astigmatism under cyclplegia respectively with 71-84%, 59-80%, 51-54% of sensitivity (right eye-left eye) and 90-92%, 95%, 98% of specificity. CONCLUSION: Without cycloplegia, Retinomax is able to measure cylinder power with the same reproducibility as cycloplegic retinoscopy. No significant difference was found in the cylinder values obtained with the quick and the normal modes. Therefore, the quick mode of measurement is recommended as it is more feasible in children. No difference, which is significant from a screening point of view, exists between the non-cycloplegic and the cycloplegic cylinder value (< 0.25 D). Retinomax diagnoses abnormal astigmatism (> or = 2 D) in a non-cycloplegic refractive screening at preschool ages with 51-84% sensitivity rates and 98-90% specificity rates, depending on the chosen threshold of manifest astigmatism. If 2 D of manifest astigmatism is chosen as a positive test, the positive predictive value of the screening reaches 81-84% and the negative predictive value 91-90% (right eye-left eye).

Age Distribution↗
PubMed1999

Natural history of diabetic macular streak exudates: evidence from a screening programme.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diabetic retinopathy screening guidelines recommend referral to an ophthalmologist if there is exudate within one disc diameter of the fovea. Many of these patients, however, have resolution of small amounts of exudate without treatment. This study aimed to assess whether patients with minimal streak or dot exudates within one disc diameter of the fovea can be monitored in a screening programme without compromising visual acuity. METHODS: A retrospective review of records and Polaroid photographs obtained by one screening centre over a 10 year period was performed. Outcomes measured were referral rates, alteration of Snellen visual acuity, and the need for macular photocoagulation treatment. RESULTS: 55 patients (74 eyes) fulfilled entry criteria (37 streak and 37 dot exudates). Mean follow up was 56.1 months (range 12-127 months). Twenty five patients (30 eyes) were referred to an ophthalmologist. 13 eyes (17.6%) required macular photocoagulation treatment. Four eyes (5.4%) lost two or more lines of Snellen acuity over the follow up period (three from macular oedema and one from macular ischaemia). There was no relation between the presence or resolution of minimal exudate and visual loss (p>0.2). CONCLUSION: It is appropriate to monitor eyes with streak or dot macular exudates at 6-9 monthly intervals in a screening programme.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

National cross sectional study of detection of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: role of childhood screening and surveillance. The British Congenital Cataract Interest Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the mode of detection and timing of ophthalmic assessment of a nationally representative group of children with congenital and infantile cataract. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: All children born in the United Kingdom and aged 15 years or under in whom congenital or infantile cataract was newly diagnosed between October 1995 and September 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of cases detected through routine ocular examination and proportion assessed by an ophthalmologist by 3 months and 1 year of age. RESULTS: Data were complete for 235 (95%) of 248 children identified. Of these, 83 (35%) were detected at the routine newborn examination and 30 (12%) at the 6-8 week examination; 82 children presented symptomatically. 137 (57%) children had been assessed by an ophthalmologist by the age of 3 months but 78 (33%) were not examined until after 1 year of age. In 91 cases the child's carers suspected an eye defect before cataract was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of children with congenital and infantile cataract are not diagnosed by 3 months of age, although routine ocular examination of all newborn and young infants is recommended nationally. Strategies to achieve earlier detection through screening and surveillance are required.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The early treatment for ROP (ETROP) randomized trial: study results and nursing care adaptations.

The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) study, funded by the National Eye Institute, has shown that early treatment of high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) improves retinal and visual outcomes at 9 months corrected age. These favorable study results have yielded new guidelines for treatment of infants with ROP This paper reviews the study methodology and results and outlines the neonatal and ophthalmic nursing interventions influenced by this new treatment schedule. Four critical phases, screening/examination, treatment, evaluation, and follow-up, are identified, and key nursing objectives and tasks are discussed.

Aftercare↗
PubMed1989

Automated perimetry, tonometry, and questionnaire in glaucoma screening.

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various portions of the glaucoma screening process, 145 participants underwent complete ophthalmic examinations. A weighted questionnaire was 20% (2 patients) and 36% (5 suspects) sensitive for the glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, respectively. Tonometry alone was 20% (2 patients) and 7% (1 suspect) sensitive for glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, respectively. Automated perimetry of the central 30 degrees and nasal periphery identified nine (90%) of the glaucoma patients and five (36%) of the glaucoma suspects. The presence of increased intraocular pressure was not by itself very useful, but when perimetry or tonometry was used, 10 (100%) of the glaucoma group was identified. We recommend that automated suprathreshold perimetry and tonometry be performed in glaucoma screening.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Epidemiology of ROP in the Stockholm area of Sweden.

A prospective, population-based study of the epidemiology of ROP in a well-defined geographical area of Sweden was performed. Two hundred and sixty children with a birth weight of 1500 g or less, and surviving for at least eight weeks, were included in the study. ROP was seen in 40.4% of the children. We suggest that prematurely born children with a gestational age of 32 weeks or less ought to be screened for ROP.

Cryosurgery↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE: to extend a preliminary study of the internal structure of six measures comprising the 'conventional' subtests of the Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) in order to develop a short screening test for visual neglect. DESIGN: discriminant function analysis of the 15 tests constituting BIT. SETTING: rehabilitation centre. PATIENTS: 59 selected from consecutive stroke patients entering the centre. SELECTION CRITERIA: absent prior history of major CNS disorder, at least 1 week post-stroke, right-handed for writing, absent significant visual impairment other than visual field deficit, no psychiatric overlay or generalized intellectual deterioration, and ability to comprehend and respond to the visuomotor tasks administered. COMPARISON GROUP: 50 non-brain-damaged subjects (hospital employees, members of University subject panel, and local community volunteers). ASSESSMENTS: the 15 tests constituting the BIT. RESULTS: two subtests, letter cancellation and star cancellation, were the most sensitive measure, identifying 74% of neglect patients with no false positives. CONCLUSIONS: letter and star cancellation offer an adequate yet brief screening test for determining which patients might benefit from administration of the complete neglect test battery.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗
PubMed1994

[Visual acuity of military personnel with civilian or military driver's license on consulting an ophthalmologist].

Visual acuity was tested in 1861 members of the German armed forces who possessed military or civilian driving licences, first by means of a screening test (Roden-stock R12) and second by an ophthalmologist observing German Industrial Standard 58220, part 3. The tests were done with the patients wearing any corrective spectacles in use before the appointment. In 27.6% of all subjects the monocular or binocular visual acuity was less than 1.0. Binocular visual acuity less than 1.0 was found in 17.0%, less than 0.8 in 7.3% and less than 0.5 in 0.9%. After adjustment of the corrective lenses by the ophthalmologist these figures were reduced to visual acuity less than 1.0 in 1.6%, less than 0.8 in 0.4% and less than 0.5 in 0.1%. The frequency of suboptimal visual acuity showed no difference in driving licence classes. We found fewer cases of suboptimal visual acuity in our patients than Kratz and Häseker found in the civilian community in the study published in 1986. The age distribution was also different. In contrast to former publications, which showed an age-related progression, our population had the lowest number of subjects with subnormal visual acuity in the age group 35-45 years. The screening test for visual acuity and the test by the ophthalmologist showed the same results in 76.8% of cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.

PURPOSE: To conduct a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy of the frequency-doubling contrast test as a means of screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. METHODS: Contrast thresholds for frequency-doubled stimuli were obtained under four test conditions: superior hemifield, inferior hemifield, and central (5 degrees radius) targets using a method of adjustment (MOA); superior hemifield, inferior hemifield, and central targets using a modified binary search (MOBS); four quadrant stimuli and the central target using MOBS; and 16 stimuli (four per quadrant) and the central target using MOBS. One eye each of 36 patients with early (12), moderate (12), and advanced (12) glaucomatous visual field loss was tested, as was one eye each of 36 age-matched normal control subjects. RESULTS: For hemifield stimuli, the MOBS test procedure had better test-retest reliability, lower individual variation, and greater separation of the normal population and the population with glaucoma than did the MOA procedure. The use of progressively smaller, more localized stimuli produced successively better separation of glaucomatous and age-matched normal control eyes. Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was 0.81 for hemifield stimuli (sensitivity and specificity, 70% to 75%), 0.91 for quadrant stimuli (sensitivity and specificity, 83% to 85%), and 0.965 for the 16 stimuli (sensitivity 93%, specificity 100%). Test time was approximately 1.3 minutes for hemifields, 1.5 minutes for quadrants, and 5 minutes for the 16 targets. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results indicate that the frequency-doubled contrast test provides a quick, efficient means of screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. Test time is relatively short, test-retest reliability is good, and sensitivity and specificity for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss is very good. The use of the MOBS staircase procedure and small, localized stimuli result in the best performance for screening purposes. An expanded normative database and the use of more rapid suprathreshold screening strategies should enhance further the efficacy of this test.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Preventive health care of Indian preschoolers in the Sioux Lookout Zone, northwestern Ontario.

The provision of preventive health care to native children in the Sioux Lookout Zone of northwestern Ontario was assessed by reviewing the medical charts of 568 randomly selected preschoolers in 1980. Data were collected on the method of infant feeding; immunization status, vaccination and testing for tuberculosis; development, vision and hearing screening; monitoring of growth; and nutritional status and vitamin supplementation. Most of the children had been breast-fed and had received primary diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus-polio immunization as well as measles-mumps-rubella and bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. However, less than 30% had undergone developmental screening, and only 10% and 8% respectively had had their vision and hearing screened. Growth monitoring was adequate in the first year of life but not thereafter. Only about 55% of the children had ever had a hemoglobin level determined. More emphasis on health promotion is needed if native children are to receive adequate preventive health care.

Breast Feeding↗
PubMed2002

Evaluation of a district-wide screening programme for diabetic retinopathy utilizing trained optometrists using slit-lamp and Volk lenses.

BACKGROUND: Debate exists about the optimum way to screen for diabetic retinopathy. Cameras produce a permanent record, but offer patients less choice about when and where to be screened. Optometrists offer flexibility but sensitivity and specificity of schemes have varied considerably, perhaps because of variability in screening methodology and that there is frequently no quality assurance programme. AIMS: To audit our district-wide (population 340000) screening programme for diabetic retinopathy against national targets: sensitivity > 80%, specificity > 95% and referral to review < 3 months. METHODS: Trained optometrists performed slit-lamp examination with Volk lenses (78 dioptre) with standardized reporting. Audit was by ophthalmologist with slit-lamp and Volk lenses through dilated pupils. RESULTS: We examined 872 eyes of 439 patients; 64% were normal, 29% background diabetic retinopathy, 7% sight-threatening eye disease (STED). Sixty-three percent of patients were seen within 6 months of the original screen. Of these, sensitivity for any retinopathy was 72%, specificity 77%, positive predictive value (PPV) 53%, negative predictive value (NPV) 88%. For STED, in this group, sensitivity was 87% and specificity 91%, PPV 30%, NPV 99%. Median interval referral to ophthalmological review was 11.5 weeks with 73% reviewed in under the 13-week target. Of those referred 25% received laser therapy. Eleven patients found to have referable eye disease at their initial screen were not referred to an ophthalmologist by their GP. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that effective district-wide screening for diabetic retinopathy by optometrists using slit-lamp and Volk lenses is possible; however, only 36% of identified people with diabetes in the district were screened over a 4-year period.

Diabetic Retinopathy↗
PubMed2005

Detecting glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology perimetry: a comparison between N-30 and C-20 screening programs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in detecting glaucoma with N-30 and C-20 screening programs. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 80 patients were enrolled (40 glaucomatous, 40 controls). Humphrey achromatic perimetry (standard automated perimetry, SAP) was considered as the "gold standard" for diagnosis. To assess whether N-30 screening program could detect more initial glaucomatous defects than C-20, glaucomatous patients included 20 cases with nasal step at SAP (pre-selected by medical chart inspection). Patients underwent two SAP examinations to confirm diagnosis; then two N-30 and two C-20 screening tests with frequency-doubling technology were performed in a randomized sequence. Finally, a frequency-doubling technology N-30 full-threshold examination was performed. Several criteria to define abnormality at frequency-doubling technology screening programs were evaluated. RESULTS: For both C-20 and N-30 screening programs, the best parameter to detect glaucoma was the presence of at least 1 point with P < 5% (sensitivity = 87.5% for both tests and specificity of 90% and 95% for C-20 and N-30, respectively). Both screening procedures obtained a lower sensitivity (75%) in patients with a nasal step, whereas frequency-doubling technology full-threshold program was able to detect the initial defects in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: N-30 and C-20 screening procedures obtained similar results in well-defined glaucoma patients in terms of sensitivity and specificity. In the presence of a standard automated perimetry nasal step, diagnostic ability with both frequency-doubling technology screening strategies decreased and one quarter of nasal steps went undetected.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Levels of visual impairment in a day centre for people with a mental handicap.

A prospective study screening for visual impairment in a day centre for people with a mental handicap showed that 30% required spectacles or registration as blind or partially-sighted and a further 20% had previously unknown pathology. Carers were not reliable in identifying visual problems in their charges, and routine screening should be encouraged. High Street optometrists should be able to measure visual acuity in the individuals in this sample excluding those cared for in special care units for whom screening may be less beneficial.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology.

BACKGROUND: The authors describe a new photoscreening camera designed to detect amblyogenic factors, including strabismus, asymmetric and abnormal refractive errors, and media opacities. The photoscreener uses eccentric photorefraction principles and provides two meridian photographs of the retinal reflex. METHODS: Pass/fail screening data from the photographs of 202 nondilated children as determined by two masked observers were compared with data from complete ophthalmologic examinations. RESULTS: The photoscreener had a sensitivity rate of 87%, a specificity rate of 89%, a positive predictive value of 93%, a negative predictive value of 80%, and an overall agreement rate of 88%. The prescreening probability for amblyogenic factors was 63%. Constant strabismus was detected in all cases. Five intermittent strabismus cases were missed. Two patients with myopia, three patients with hyperopia, and five patients with astigmatism were missed. All media opacities were detected. CONCLUSION: This new two-flash photoscreening camera, which uses high-speed Polaroid film, is an accurate, reliable method of detecting amblyogenic factors in undilated children. The camera offers promise as a useful mass screening tool.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests.

PURPOSE: Frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry has shown promise as a screening test for glaucoma. This study investigates different possible decision rules for FDT screening by applying them to groups of normal and glaucoma subjects. METHODS: Within three centers, 218 subjects (aged 15-88 years; 78 with glaucoma, 140 without ocular disease) were each tested twice with the screening program of the FDT perimeter. The subjects consisted of 140 normal subjects with no evidence of glaucoma or other ocular disease likely to affect the visual field and 78 subjects with a diagnosis of glaucoma and no other ocular disease. Fifteen decision rules were applied to the data to compare their sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Estimated specificities of the different decision rules ranged from 78% to 99%, although with this sample size, the confidence intervals for these estimates are quite large. Estimated sensitivities ranged from 40% to 72%. Suggested criteria for distinguishing normal subjects from those with glaucoma seem to be either a cluster of two or more adjacent locations abnormal at the p < 2% level with at least one location confirmed or a single location very abnormal (p < 1%) and confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Specificity was clearly improved by confirming an apparently abnormal test result by repeating the screening test outweighing the resultant small loss in sensitivity. These findings provide useful information for making an informed choice of decision rules for FDT screening results.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A pilot study of glaucoma visual field screening in diabetes.

Because people with diabetes may be at increased risk of glaucoma, we performed a pilot study using automated visual field testing for screening them. One hundred and seventy-six diabetic persons who had participated in the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy were tested with the Armaly-Drance screening pattern on the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Individuals with moderate diabetic retinopathy or worse tended to have lower sensitivity of the central visual field and missed more points than those with no or only mild retinopathy. People with a history of glaucoma had slightly less sensitivity and missed more points than controls. These preliminary findings suggest that although people with diabetes and glaucoma may more frequently have visual field defects than people with diabetes but no glaucoma, a larger study is needed. This pilot study shows that such a study would be feasible and should be designed to indicate the sensitivity, specificity, and cost-benefit ratio of a screening program so as to assess the utility of the screening visual field test for finding glaucoma amongst people with diabetes.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Computer-based determination of stereopsis].

AIM: A computer-based approach to assess stereopsis for screening purposes is described. This approach is based on random-dot stereograms (RDS). METHOD: The TNO test is a common method to assess stereopsis based on red/green anaglyphs and the use of RDS. This technique was transferred to a computer-based platform. To investigate the validity of the computer-based approach, 25 subjects were tested with both the TNO test and the computer-based approach. RESULTS: With regard to the spectral emission of the monitor screen, accurate separation of red and green for RDS generation was not possible. However, adaptation of the RDS to the colour filters used permitted the best-possible separation. The resolution of the monitor required a viewing distance of 2 m. The results obtained showed no significant differences between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: For the computer-based screening, RDS and anaglyphs can be employed. The influence of the spectral emission of the monitor screen and its resolution can be reduced by adapting the RDS colours to the filters used and modifying the viewing distance.

Depth Perception↗