Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Surgeons”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

A report on the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Outcomes Initiative: what have we learned and what is its potential?

INTRODUCTION: The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Outcomes Initiative established a national database in 1999. The goal was to provide a vehicle whereby surgeons could accumulate meaningful data about their surgical activity and procedure outcomes. METHODS: Through a secure Internet site, participants entered core data at the time of operation on all patients undergoing any laparoscopic or open procedure. Procedure-specific data was accumulated for cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia, and fundoplication. A second data set was collected at the time of follow-up evaluation. Individual data and a summary of national data were available through the Web site for contemporaneous review. RESULTS: Between May 1999 and December 2001, 4,100 cases were entered by 73 surgeons, including data for 1070 cholecystectomies, 1,070 antireflux procedures, and 300 hernias. The remaining cases encompassed all other procedures. Perioperative and follow-up data showed many interesting findings. For example, 30% of cholecystectomies were first-assisted by a nonphysician. The rate of conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery was 3%. In the gastroesophageal reflex disease (GERD) report on fundoplications, 21% of the patients had a previous fundoplication. This report contains a summary of the data collected during this period in the national database. CONCLUSIONS: The SAGES Outcomes Initiative allows surgeons to be involved in data collection about their practice. It provides data on the general practice of surgery, which are more useful for setting benchmarks than published data from the surgical elite.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed2002

Are plastic surgery advertisements conforming to the ethical codes of the american society of plastic surgeons?

Cosmetic surgeons have increasingly come under fire for using advertisements that may be deceptive or intended for the solicitation of vulnerable consumers. However, aesthetic surgery is a growing business that relies heavily on advertising to survive. To prevent the use of deceptive advertisements, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons has developed a code of ethics for its physician members. We conducted a study to determine the prevalence of cosmetic surgery advertisements considered objectionable by the lay public. These advertisements were published in the Yellow Pages of the 10 largest U.S. cities. Because all of the advertisements in this study contained the American Society of Plastic Surgeons logo, we also determined whether its members are upholding the ethical code of advertising. We asked a convenience sample of 50 participants to rate 104 advertisements using four yes/no questions derived from the code of ethics and one overall yes/no question regarding whether the advertisement was objectionable. We obtained the mean percentage of "yes" responses for each advertisement, from the total sample, for each question. We found that the study participants felt that 25 percent of the advertisements used images of persons or facsimiles that falsely and deceptively created unjustified expectations of favorable results. The participants responded that 22 percent of the advertisements appealed primarily to the layperson's fears, anxieties, or emotional vulnerabilities. In addition, 18 percent of the advertisements were considered to be objectionable. Discretion is currently left up to physicians as to the ethical nature of their advertisements. Although the majority of American Society of Plastic Surgeons members uphold the ethical code of advertising, there are still a substantial number of published advertisements that the average consumer considers to be in violation of this code.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

"Respectful image": revenge of the barber surgeon.

Although some separation of surgery from the practice of medicine had begun to develop in early medieval times, this was accentuated in 1215 by the Fourth Lateran Council, a papal edict which forbade physicians (most of whom where clergy) from performing surgical procedures, as contact with blood or body fluids was viewed as contaminating to men of the church. As a result, the practice of surgery was relegated to craft status with training by apprenticeship through guilds. Physicians followed a university-directed program of education, which involved knowledge of the classics and writings of ancient medical authors such as those by Galen, which allowed no independent thought or inquiry. Competition among physicians and surgeons, including the lowest group of surgical practitioners, the barbers, continued until Henry VIII signed a charter in 1540 uniting barbers and surgeons in London. This Guild of Barbers and Surgeons, forerunner of the Royal College of Surgeons, established a regulatory agency for training and certification of surgical practice, which set the stage for legitimizing surgery as a profession.

Barber Surgeons↗
PubMed1996

[From barber-surgeons' guild to medical association. A 400th anniversary].

The barber-surgeons' guild in Bergen was founded on 17 January 1597. For nearly 250 years this was the only "medical association" in Norway. The guild disappeared with the death of its latest master, Christian Wilhelm Wisbech (1740-1822). However, only nine years later his son, Christian Wisbech (1801-69), founded the Medical Association in Bergen. The barber-surgeons were craftsmen who got their education by apprenticeship. They were the medical practitioners of their times. Their empirical knowledge was more in touch with real life than was the medicine taught by the professors. This paper describes the barber-surgeons' education and work, including their conflicts with other craftsmen and doctors. During the 18th century the barber-surgeons' education was improved, and eventually was given full academic status.

Barber Surgeons↗
PubMed1998

What is the best method of surgical training?: A report of America's leading senior surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the career choices and developments made by leading senior surgeons in this country and to examine hypothetically whether application of a short tracking program would have hindered their career decisions. DESIGN: A survey pertaining to each surgeon's career, decisions, and opinions concerning surgical training. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Senior surgeons of regional and national surgical societies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survey responses. RESULTS: A total of 352 surveys (41.4%) were received. Respondents answered that the most common reasons for choosing a specialty were role models or mentors (56%), research (51%), and available patient population (23%). The 2 most common stages in a career at which the respondents became interested in a specialty, or an area of expertise, were at the junior residency level (when the specialty was chosen) and at the assistant professor level (when a more specific topic within the specialty was chosen). The most common stage at which the group believed they acquired their expertise was also at the assistant professor level. Seventy-one percent of respondents believed broad training was superior to a short tracking system, although none had participated in shortened surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: Most leading senior surgeons in this country still believe that broad surgical training is superior and should be maintained. Because career specialties in this surveyed group were generally chosen in early residency, a hypothetical application of the short tracking system would have still allowed for these important decisions to be made. Also, it seems likely that specialty and career development would not have been hindered because "expertization" mostly occurred after training was completed. Regardless of training method, a role model or mentor seems most important in career choices and developments.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Experience and attitudes of surgeons toward palliation in cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgery can effectively palliate symptoms in patients with advanced malignancy and thereby maintain quality of life. However, the goal of surgical palliation should be balanced with the associated risks, and the decision to operate can be challenging for even the most experienced surgeon. HYPOTHESIS: There are significant deficiencies in training during residency and in continuing medical education in palliative surgical care leading to a lack of agreement for treatment recommendations. DESIGN AND SETTING: A survey of general surgeons involving 4 clinical vignettes of patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of symptoms. Respondents were asked to select the best treatment option for each patient from a list of 6 alternatives. Furthermore, respondents identified the clinical factors that most influenced the decision, as well as the major goal of the palliative intervention. SUBJECTS: Surgeons in a midsized urban setting and its surrounding region. RESULTS: Of 124 surveys sent out, 70 (56%) were completed. Significant deficiencies in education were identified; 59 (84%) of the respondents did not receive any education in palliative surgical care during residency and 28 (44%) lacked continuing medical education. A consensus treatment recommendation was not selected in 3 of the 4 clinical vignettes, but the respondents used similar clinical factors and goals of treatment for selection of the specific recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care is a major deficiency of postgraduate surgical training. A more focused effort in training surgeons in palliative care may allow for the more uniform and standard provision of palliative surgical care to patients with advanced cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Why surgeons prefer not to care for trauma patients.

A survey of the Washington State Chapter of the American College of Surgeons was undertaken to document the opinions of surgeons on trauma care issues. Thirty-nine percent of the total sample of surgeons who responded would prefer not to treat any trauma patients. These surgeons were more likely to be older, to practice in an urban setting, to feel that trauma call has a negative impact on elective practice, and to believe more strongly that reimbursement from trauma patients is not equal to that of nontrauma patients. They also agreed more strongly with the statements that these patients require a greater time commitment and pose an increased medicolegal risk. The most significant influence on preference not to treat trauma patients was exerted by the perception of a negative impact on practice, older age, and perception of increased medicolegal risk. Reimbursement issues and location of practice were less influential factors. This information can be used to target concerns and barriers to active, willing participation in a trauma care system and to tailor strategies to deal with them effectively.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Do surgeons have a role as infectious disease consultants?

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic drug restriction policies have become widespread in North America hospitals mandating medical infectious disease consultation for use of routine antimicrobial agents. OBJECTIVE: To determine physician and institutional attitudes regarding the credibility of surgeons in the area of infectious disease. DESIGN: A survey of the Surgical Infectious Disease Society (SIS) membership. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the SIS practicing in the United States and Canada (n = 464) were sent a simple opinion poll regarding surgical infectious disease specialists. After receiving the survey, the SIS members were given approximately 4 weeks to anonymously complete the questionnaire and return it to our office. RESULTS: Responses were received from 198 SIS members (43%). Most were from large (> 400 bed) institutions (63%), and the majority of them were from university centers (76%). Predictably, 86% of the respondents were in full-time academic practice. Some SIS respondents (21%) had undergone special training in infectious disease, and of these, 63% actually had completed a formal surgical infectious disease fellowship. Antibiotic restriction policies were nearly universal and required in 87% of institutions. Only 44% of surgeons in these hospitals, however, were privileged to release antibiotic drugs. Medical infectious disease physicians recognized surgical expertise in infectious disease in few instances (32%). The great majority of responding SIS members (81%) believed that an examination or certification in infectious disease for surgeons was not warranted. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic drug restriction is prevalent in North America, and medical infectious disease specialists do not generally recognize surgical expertise in the area of infectious disease. Despite this environment, responding SIS members believe that special credentialing of surgeons in the area of infectious disease is unnecessary.

Communicable Diseases↗
PubMed1990

A surgeon with AIDS. Lack of evidence of transmission to patients.

In January 1989 [corrected], the media reported the identity of a surgeon who was recently diagnosed with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Concern about surgeon-to-patient transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) persisted despite reassurances from health authorities. Therefore, HIV antibody testing was offered to the surgeon's patients. We identified 2160 patients operated on since 1982; none had been reported to Tennessee's AIDS registry. A total of 264 had already died; none were reported to have died of AIDS or other HIV-related diseases. Of the 1896 patients remaining, we contacted 1652; 616 (37%) were tested. Only one (an intravenous drug user) was HIV antibody positive, and his medical history suggested that he may already have had AIDS at the time of his surgery. These results support the concept that the risks to patients operated on by HIV-infected surgeons are most likely quite low and support recommendations for the individualized assessment of HIV-infected health care workers.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed1998

How tumor stage affects surgeons' surveillance strategies after surgery for carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.

BACKGROUND: The factors that influence decision-making among surgeons are not well understood. The authors evaluated how tumor stage in otherwise healthy patients subjected to potentially curative surgery for upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) epidermoid carcinoma affects the self-reported follow-up strategies employed by practicing surgeons. METHODS: Hypothetical patient profiles and a detailed questionnaire based on these profiles were mailed to the 824 members of the Society of Head and Neck Surgeons (SHNS) and the 522 members of the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery who were not members of SHNS. The effect of TNM stage on the surveillance strategies chosen by the respondents was analyzed. RESULTS: Ten of the 14 most commonly employed surveillance modalities were ordered significantly more frequently with increasing TNM stage. This effect persisted through 5 years of follow-up, but the differences across stages were small. Only 30% of respondents modified their strategies according to the patient's TNM stage. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons performing surveillance after potentially curative surgery in otherwise healthy patients with UADT carcinoma use the same follow-up strategy irrespective of TNM stage. These data permit rational design of a randomized clinical trial of two alternate follow-up plans.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Jacob Da Silva Solis-Cohen: America's first head and neck surgeon.

Jacob Da Silva Solis-Cohen was a Renaissance physician and healer, who possessed great technical and intellectual skills. He was a self-made specialist in aerodigestive tract disease at a time when this was generally perceived as charlatanism. Unlike his contemporaries in laryngology, he was a trained surgeon, and he believed strongly that the laryngologist should be capable of doing his own surgery. Solis-Cohen was not a general surgeon who did work in the head and neck, but rather the first general surgeon who became a specialist in diseases of the upper air and food passages. His educational development is the model by which today's conventional paradigm in the training of Head and Neck Surgeons is designed. He fathered a medical and surgical specialty in America from its infancy in the 19th century until it was firmly grounded in the beginnings of this century. Just as Mosher was known as the "Chief" in the first half of this century, Jacob Da Silva Solis-Cohen had been designated the "Nestor" and "Chief" in laryngology many decades earlier. He died 2 months shy of 90 years on December 22, 1927.

History, 19th Century↗
PubMed1997

Psychological aspects of cancer surgery: surgeons' attitudes and opinions.

Fifty-one surgical consultants, registrars and senior registrars in NHS hospitals in the West Midlands (UK) were interviewed about psychological aspects of cancer surgery: information given to patients, the bad news interview, psychological risk factors in surgery, psychiatric morbidity, difficult patients, and care of the dying. Information that tended to be provided infrequently included the cause of the disease, the effects of surgery on sexual functioning, and psychological side-effects of the surgery. Surgeons most often answered incompletely patients' questions about prognosis, effects of surgery on sexual functioning, the presence of malignancy, and probable length of life. Concerning the disclosure of malignancy, 37% said they always tell the patient; 8% tell virtually all patients; 49% tell the patient depending on the patient's and relatives' wishes; and 6% tell the relatives and possibly the patient. A common strategy among 49% is to use the word 'growth' and wait for the patient to ask further. Few surgeons took even the briefest psychiatric history, and only the most severe post-operative psychological complications were referred to psychiatrists. The most difficult patients for surgeons to manage were emotionally labile, angry, demanding, controlling, refusing treatment, or predicting failure. The surgeons in this sample clearly struggled with their role as giver of bad news and with the consequent emotional reactions of the patient.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1988

Risk to surgeons: a survey of accidental injuries during operations.

A survey was conducted with the participation of eight consultant general surgeons, two consultant urologists, four consultant orthopaedic surgeons and four surgical residents to find the incidence of accidental injuries to surgeons and their assistants during operations. Of the total of 2016 operations over a one year period there were 112 reported accidental injuries. These included 107 needle stick injuries, 4 knife cuts and 1 diathermy burn. We found that accidental injuries to surgeons during operations were inevitable.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed1993

Eye protection for the vascular surgeon.

Contamination occurring during vascular surgery was studied prospectively using a surgical mask incorporating a Splashguard visor. Over a 16-week period 78 vascular procedures were included; 44 were of < 2 h duration and 34 were of > or = 2 h. Contamination on both mask and visor from blood spots was recorded at the end of each procedure. Overall, 51 per cent of principal surgeons' visors were contaminated, with contamination of the mask itself in 32 per cent. When two surgeons were operating the contamination rate for the second was also high: 36 per cent for the visor and 42 per cent for the mask. Assistants had a contamination rate of 36 per cent for the visor and 13 per cent for the mask. The lowest rate of contamination occurred for the visor and mask of the scrub nurse, 10 and 4 per cent respectively. For emergency procedures the duration of operation had no influence on the frequency of contamination. However, for the principal surgeon elective operations of < 2 h duration were less likely to involve contamination than those of > or = 2 h (P < 0.035). Blood contamination of visors and masks is common in vascular surgery but rarely appreciated by the surgeon. Routine eye protection should be considered in vascular surgery, in particular for emergency and prolonged elective procedures.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗
PubMed1995

Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study.

A 1-year prospective analysis was undertaken of all non-day-case general surgery in a district general hospital. Using the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) scoring system 3004 patients were assessed. From the predictions of mortality and morbidity so obtained, a quality measure, the ratio of observed to expected numbers of deaths and complications (O:E ratio) was determined for each surgeon, both overall and within specialty zones. The present study demonstrates the serious hazard in using 'raw' uncorrected mortality and morbidity statistics to compare surgeon performance. Mortality rates varied from 1.0 to 4.9 per cent whereas O:E ratios ranged from 0.83 to 1.06; morbidity rates varied from 5.3 to 12.6 per cent with O:E ratios 0.86-1.02. Great misunderstanding may result from the publication of surgeon or hospital 'league tables'. The present study demonstrates a technique that might allow surgeon performance to be monitored adequately and accurately.

Day Care, Medical↗
PubMed2005

Surgeons' and nurses' use of e-mail communication with head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: "Telephone tag" for questions about postoperative symptoms and other concerns often engenders dissatisfaction. E-mail use may improve communication between patients and clinicians. This study aimed to describe surgeons' and nurses' use of E-mail with patients and their caregivers after head and neck cancer surgery. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of head and neck nurses and surgeons. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of surgeon and 87% of nurse respondents used E-mail, but only 40% and 25%, respectively, used it with patients. More than 50% of both clinician groups that used E-mail with patients have done so for 2 to 5 years and began this practice at the request of patients. Surgeons not using E-mail with patients were twice as likely as nurses to cite privacy and liability issues, as well as time management and miscommunication concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Some clinicians use E-mail with patients, most often by patient request. Medicolegal and clinical ramifications require further study.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Surgeon's view of the skull base from the lateral approach.

This paper presents the surgical anatomy of the skull base and infratemporal fossa. The information has been derived from the author's own experience in surgical and cadaver dissection, standard anatomical references, and selected experience of other skull base surgeons. Because the lateral approach has become the utilitarian method of exposure, the intricate detailed anatomy is demonstrated from this view at five levels of dissection, so the surgeon may gain a practical understanding of the surgical relationship of critical structures. Consistent anatomical landmarks can be used by the surgeon in the location of these critical structures. The styloid process, sphenoidal spine, and middle meningeal artery identify the internal carotid artery as it enters the carotid canal. The bony or fibrous septum that divides the jugular foramen into neural and vascular compartments may be used to better identify nerves IX, X, and XI. The zygomatic root is useful for location of the middle fossa dura. The lateral pterygoid plate leads directly to the foramen ovale. The increased precision of dissection permitted by use of the microscope requires an increased level of knowledge of anatomical structures in this area. It is hoped that the information presented in this paper will assist surgeons in the meticulous and thorough removal of skull base tumors and in the preservation of neural and vascular structures that are presently being sacrificed.

Anthropometry↗
PubMed2000

Role of the surgeon as a variable in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Increasingly, data are being accumulated on the influence of intersurgeon variability on outcome after curative surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma. Thus, today the individual surgeon has to be considered as an independent factor influencing locoregional recurrence, as well as survival rates. In general, higher local control and survival can be expected for specialized colorectal surgeons. There are no clear correlations between surgical volume and outcome. Interinstitutional variability in treatment results reflects intersurgeon variability, but analysis is generally more difficult because of a lack of homogeneity with respect to different confounding factors. There are several factors in surgical technique that are important for long-term outcome. Of greatest apparent importance is the adequacy of mesorectal excision (for carcinomas of the middle and lower third, total mesorectal excision; for carcinomas of the upper third, mesorectal excision down to a mesorectal plane 5 cm distal to the gross tumor margin detected by the surgeon in situ). Furthermore, intraoperative local tumor spillage (tumor perforation during mobilization, incision into the tumor), en bloc resection technique, skill, and the extent of regional lymphadenectomy may influence outcome. For quality assurance, detailed operative reports are required, as well as histopathology examinations concerning indicators of surgical oncologic quality discernable from the resection specimens. In future clinical trials of multimodal treatment of rectal cancer, quality assurance of surgery and pathology is necessary for consideration of the surgeon and surgical technique prognostic factors.

Colorectal Surgery↗