Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Influence of a 5HT1 receptor agonist on gastric accommodation and initial transpyloric flow in healthy subjects.

Sumatriptan, a 5HT1 receptor agonist, inhibits antral motor activity, delays gastric emptying and relaxes the gastric fundus. The aim of this study was to characterize the effect of sumatriptan on transpyloric flow and gastric accommodation during and immediately after ingestion of a liquid meal using duplex sonography. Ten healthy subjects were investigated twice on separate days. In random order either sumatriptan 6 mg (Imigran 0.5 mL) or a placebo were given s.c. 15 min before ingesting 500 mL of a meat soup. The subjects were examined during the 3-min period before ingestion of the liquid meal, the 3-min spent drinking the meal and 10 min postprandially. Sumatriptan caused a significant widening of both the gastric antrum (P=0.02) and the proximal stomach (P=0.01) 10 min postprandially as compared with placebo. It caused no significant differences in time to initial gastric emptying (P=0.2), but significantly delayed commencement of peristaltic-related transpyloric flow (P=0.04). Sumatriptan had no significant effect on mean abdominal symptom scores, but after sumatriptan there was a significant negative correlation between width of postprandial antral area and postprandial nausea and between width of postprandial antral area and postprandial bloating. We therefore conclude that sumatriptan causes a postprandial dilatation of both the distal and the proximal stomach with no change in dyspeptic symptoms nor in length of time to first gastric emptying. Time to commencement of peristaltic-related emptying is delayed.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Treatment of cluster headache: clinical trials, design and results.

The spontaneous capricious course of cluster headache may give rise to some problems when treatment is being evaluated. This is one of several explanations for there being so few well-designed, randomized, double-blind clinical trials in cluster headache. The standard treatment of acute attacks of cluster headache is inhalation of 100% oxygen. In the prophylaxis of episodic cluster headache, ergotamine, verapamil, lithium, serotonin, inhibitors and steroids are used. In chronic cluster, lithium is the drug of choice, but verapamil may also be tried. Recently, hyperbaric oxygen has been shown to immediately abort acute attacks, and it seems that it may also be useful in the prophylactic treatment. The introduction of the novel 5HT1 agonist sumatriptan as a symptomatic relief of cluster attacks represents further significant progress. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trials have shown sumatriptan 6 mg sc to be a rapid, effective and well-tolerated acute treatment for cluster headache attacks. Within 15 min of treatment, 74% of attacks on sumatriptan responded compared to 26% of placebo-treated attacks. Functional disability was also significantly improved. Increasing the dose to 12 mg did not offer significantly greater relief compared to sumatriptan 6 mg, but was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events. Interim analysis of 3 months of data from a recent multinational open trial comprising, 138 patients having treated 6353 attacks with subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg revealed a headache relief in 96% of attacks treated. There was no evidence of an increased incidence of adverse events with frequent use of sumatriptan. No tachyphylaxis was seen over the 3 months, suggesting that sumatriptan is effective and well tolerated also in long-term acute treatment for cluster headache.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Further characterization of the putative 5-HT receptor which mediates blockade of neurogenic plasma extravasation in rat dura mater.

1. We describe the effects of pretreatment with 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor agonists and antagonists on neurogenically-mediated plasma protein extravasation ([125I]-albumin) in rat dura mater and in extracranial tissues (temporalis muscle fascia, conjunctiva, eyelid and lip) induced by electrical stimulation of the right trigeminal ganglion. 2. Leakage of [125I]-bovine serum albumin from blood vessels in dura mater following high intensity stimulation (1.2 mA, 5 ms, 5 Hz for 5 min) was significantly reduced by the intravenous administration of drugs active at 5-HT receptors with some selectivity for the 5-HT1 receptor subtypes: 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) (threshold dose, 1 ng kg-1); 5-benzyloxytryptamine (5-BT) (10, 30 or 100 micrograms kg-1); 8-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (300 micrograms kg-1); and as previously reported, sumatriptan (100 micrograms kg-1), dihydroergotamine (DHE) (50 micrograms kg-1); ergotamine tartrate (100 micrograms kg-1) and chronically administered methysergide (1 mg kg-1). 3. The putative 5-HT receptor antagonist, metergoline 100 micrograms kg-1, inhibited partially the effect of sumatriptan in dura mater providing additional evidence for a 5-HT1 receptor subtype-mediated mechanism, although it was not effective against 5-CT (1 ng kg-1). Methiothepin (300 micrograms kg-1) did not affect the response to sumatriptan. When administered at high concentrations (1 mg kg-1) methiothepin and metergoline decreased plasma protein extravasation in rat dura mater. 4. Pretreatment with the 5-HT2 receptor antagonists pizotifen, 300pugkg 1, or ketanserin, 300,ugkg ', or the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists MDL 72222, 300,ugkg-1, or ICS 205-930, 300pgkg-1, did not affect plasma protein leakage following electrical trigeminal stimulation. Blockade by sumatriptan of plasma protein extravasation was not inhibited by pizotifen (300,ug kg-1) or MDL 72222 (300pg kg- '). 5. The 5-HT receptor(s) mediating this response were present only on intracranial tissues innervated by the trigeminal nerve; plasma protein extravasation in extracranial tissues was not blocked by pretreatment with the equivalent or higher concentrations of the above drugs following low intensity trigeminal stimulation (0.1 mA, 5 ms, 5 Hz). 6. The putative 5-HT receptor(s) mediating this response were not present on sympathetic fibres innervating dura mater since unilateral removal of the superior cervical ganglion did not prevent the development of plasma protein extravasation nor did it affect the blockade by sumatriptan IOOpug kg- '. 7. The above pharmacological data suggest that intracranial vessels possess 5-HT receptor(s) which are coupled to inhibition of neurogenically-mediated plasma protein extravasation. These receptors cannot be detected on extracranial cephalic blood vessels innervated by the trigeminal nerve, although available evidence strongly suggests that the 5-HT receptors reside on perivascular trigeminal nerve fibres. The rank order of effective doses (threshold concentrations; 5-CT < 5-BT < DHE < sumatriptan < 8-OHDPAT) is most consistent with a 5-HTlB- or 5-HTlD-mediated response, among the known 5-HT1 family of receptors. However, the lack of effect of methiothepin against the actions of sumatriptan, or metergoline against the effects of 5-CT suggest important differences and the possibility that a previously unrecognized 5-HT receptor(s) is involved in this response.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗
PubMed1991

5-HT1-like receptors mediate 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced contraction of guinea-pig isolated iliac artery.

1. The effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and of the 5-HT1-like receptor agonists, 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) and sumatriptan (GR43175) were investigated in isolated ring preparations of guinea-pig common iliac artery. 2. The three agonists induced very weak, if any, contractions of unstimulated preparations, whereas they elicited concentration-dependent contractions in preparations given a moderate tone by a threshold concentration of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha). 3. Under the latter conditions, Emax values for 5-HT and 5-CT reached about 45% of PGF2 alpha maximal effect, whereas the Emax value of sumatriptan was significantly lower (about 35%). The rank order of potency (mean EC50 value, nM) was 5-CT (6.6) greater than 5-HT (22.9) greater than sumatriptan (155). Pargyline, cocaine or deoxycorticosterone were without significant effect on the contractions induced by 5-HT. 4. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, (1 alpha H, 3 alpha,5 alpha H-tropan-3-yl) 1-H-indole-3-carboxylic acid ester (ICS 205-930; 1 microM), had no effect on 5-HT-, 5-CT- and sumatriptan-induced contractions. 5. The 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserin (1 microM) caused only small rightward shifts (concentration-ratios, about 2) in the concentration-response curves to 5-HT, 5-CT and sumatriptan without significantly depressing the maximum effects. 6. In the presence of ketanserin (1 microM), the non-selective 5-HT receptor antagonist, methiothepin (0.1 microM), shifted the concentration-response curves to 5-HT and 5-CT to the right in a parallel manner and to a similar extent for both agonists (respective mean pKB values, 8.07 and 8.27). The effect of sumatriptan was also antagonized by methiothepin, but solvent effects precluded quantitative analysis of this antagonism. 7. It is concluded that 5-HT1-like receptors mediate the contractions induced by 5-HT, 5-CT and sumatriptan in guinea-pig isolated iliac artery. For reasons not yet understood, these receptors are detected only when the tissues are moderately pre-contracted by PGF2alpha.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Almotriptan improves response rates when treatment is within 1 hour of migraine onset.

BACKGROUND: Results from open-label trials with almotriptan and sumatriptan have shown higher response rates when treatment was initiated early after acute migraine onset. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the temporal component of early intervention by measuring 2-hour pain-free and sustained pain-free responses to almotriptan and sumatriptan when the study drug was taken within 1 hour of onset of moderate to severe pain. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of almotriptan and sumatriptan. Men and women, 18 to 65 years of age, who met International Headache Society criteria for migraine with or without aura were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive a single oral dose of almotriptan 12.5 or 25 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or placebo at the onset of a severe or moderate migraine attack. For this post hoc analysis, the almotriptan 25-mg dose was excluded because 12.5 mg is the recommended dose. The primary efficacy assessment was sustained pain-free, defined as pain-free at 2 hours postdose with no recurrence from 2 to 24 hours and no use of rescue medication. Only patients who took study medication within 1 hour of migraine onset were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 475 patients involved in the original study, 253 (53.3%) initiated treatment within the 0- to 1-hour interval. For these patients, 2-hour pain-free rates were 37.9% for almotriptan 12.5 mg (P=.016 versus placebo), 35.7% for sumatriptan 100 mg (P=.028 versus placebo), and 18.9% for placebo. Only almotriptan was significantly higher than placebo on the sustained pain-free rate-34.7% (P=.022 versus placebo); the sustained pain-free rate for sumatriptan was 29.6% and for placebo, 17.0%. CONCLUSION: Initiation of treatment with almotriptan 12.5 mg within the first hour after acute migraine onset resulted in a significantly higher sustained pain-free response compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in sustained pain-free rates between sumatriptan and placebo. These results are consistent with those from a previous open-label trial, and suggest that early intervention with almotriptan can improve clinical outcome.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Triptans and the incidence of epithelial defects during laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the incidence of epithelial defects during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was different in patients who were taking sumatriptan (Imitrex, Glaxo Smith Kline, Pittsburgh, Pa) for migraine headaches than in those who were not. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 54 eyes of 28 patients who had been identified as taking sumatriptan and had undergone LASIK at Minnesota Eye Consultants between 1999 and 2001. These patients were compared with 54 gender- and age-matched control eyes operated on with the same microkeratome at the same location during the same period of time. The incidence of epithelial defects during LASIK was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the sumatriptan group, 11.1% (6 of 54) of eyes developed epithelial defects as compared to 9.3% (5 of 54) of eyes in the non-triptan group (P=.75, chi square). More recent sumatriptan exposure did not increase the incidence of epithelial defect (P=.47). In patients in whom sumatriptan was stopped >1 month prior to LASIK, 6.3% (1 of 16 eyes) had epithelial defects; in patients in whom sumatriptan was stopped <1 month prior to LASIK, 14.3% (4 of 28 eyes) developed epithelial defects; and 9.3% (5 of 54 eyes) of patients in whom no triptans had ever been used had epithelial defects (P=.70). CONCLUSIONS: There is no correlation between the use of sumatriptan for relief of migraine headaches and the generation of epithelial defects during LASIK. There appears to be no reason to stop triptans before proceeding with LASIK.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Cost savings in migraine associated with less chest pain on new triptan therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This article constructs an economic model to estimate cost of chest-pain-related care in migraine patients receiving almotriptan 12.5 mg compared with those receiving sumatriptan 50 mg. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used data from the MEDSTAT Marketscan database (Ann Arbor, Michigan) to quantify incidence and costs of chest-pain-related diagnoses and procedures. After a 6-month exclusion period, the study used a pre-post design, with baseline and treatment periods defined, respectively, as 5 months before and after receiving sumatriptan therapy. An economic model was constructed to estimate annual cost savings per 1,000 patients receiving almotriptan instead of sumatriptan as a function of differing rates of chest pain. Annual direct medical cost avoided was calculated for a hypothetical health plan covering 1 million lives. RESULTS: Among a cohort of 1,390 patients, the incidence of chest-pain-related diagnoses increased significantly (43.6%) with sumatriptan, from 110 during the baseline period to 158 during the treatment period (P= .003). Aggregate costs for chest-pain-related diagnoses and procedures increased 33.1%, from $22,713 to $30,234. Payments for inpatient hospital services rose 10-fold; costs for primary care visits and outpatient hospital visits rose 53.1% and 14.4%, respectively. Payments for angiography increased from $0 to $462, and costs for chest radiographs and electrocardiograms increased 58.7% and 31.2%, respectively. Sumatriptan treatment was associated with a 3-fold increase in payments for services for painful respiration and other chest pain. The model predicted $11,215 in direct medical cost savings annually per 1000 patients treated with almotriptan instead of sumatriptan. Annual direct medical costs avoided for the health plan totaled $195,913. CONCLUSION: Using almotriptan instead of sumatriptan will likely reduce the cost of chest-pain-related care for patients with migraine headaches.

Chest Pain↗
PubMed1993

L-694,247: a potent 5-HT1D receptor agonist.

1. The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor binding selectivity profile of a novel, potent 5-HT1D receptor agonist, L-694,247 (2-[5-[3-(4-methylsulphonylamino)benzyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl ]- 1H-indole-3-yl]ethylamine) was assessed and compared with that of the 5-HT1-like receptor agonist, sumatriptan. 2. L-694,247 had an affinity (pIC50) of 10.03 at the 5-HT1D binding site and 9.08 at the 5-HT1B binding site (sumatriptan: pIC50 values 8.22 and 5.94 respectively). L-694,247 retained good selectivity with respect to the 5-HT1A binding site (pIC50 = 8.64), the 5-HT1C binding site (6.42), the 5-HT2 binding site (6.50) and the 5-HT1E binding site (5.66). The pIC50 values for sumatriptan at these radioligand binding sites were 6.14, 5.0, < 5.0 and 5.64 respectively. Both L-694,247 and sumatriptan were essentially inactive at the 5-HT3 recognition site. 3. L-694,247, like sumatriptan, displayed a similar efficacy to 5-HT in inhibiting forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase in guinea-pig substantia nigra although L-694,247 (pEC50 = 9.1) was more potent than sumatriptan (6.2) in this 5-HT1D receptor mediated functional response. L-694,247 (pEC50 = 9.4) was also more potent than sumatriptan (6.5) in a second 5-HT1D receptor mediated functional response, the inhibition of K(+)-evoked [3H]-5-HT release from guinea-pig frontal cortex slices. 4. The excellent agreement observed for L-694,247 between the 5-HTlD radioligand binding affinity and the functional potency confirm that the two functional models (the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase in guinea-pig substantia nigra and the inhibition of K+-evoked [3H]-5-HT release from guinea-pig frontal cortex) do indeed reflect 5-HTID-mediated events.5. L-694,247 is a novel, highly potent 5-HTID/5-HTIB receptor ligand which should prove useful for the exploration of the physiological role of these receptors in animals.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed1996

Evidence for 5-HT1-like receptor-mediated vasoconstriction in human pulmonary artery.

1. The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors mediating contraction of human isolated pulmonary artery rings were investigated. Responses to the agonists 5-carboximidotryptamine (5-CT, non-selective 5-HT1 agonist), sumatriptan (5-HT1D-like receptor agonist), 5-HT and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, 5-HT1A receptor agonist) were studied. Responses to 5-HT and sumatriptan in the presence of the antagonists, methiothepin (non-selective 5-HT1+2-receptor antagonist), ketanserin (5-HT2A receptor antagonist) and the novel antagonist, GR55562 (5-HT1D receptor antagonist) were also studied. 2. All agonists contracted human pulmonary artery ring preparations in the following order of potency 5-CT > 5-HT = sumatriptan > 8-OH-DPAT. Maximum responses to 5-HT, 5-CT and sumatriptan were not significantly different. 3. Methiothepin 1 nM and 10 nM, but not 0.1 nM reduced the maximum contractile responses to 5-HT but did not alter tissue sensitivity to 5-HT. Methiothepin 0.1 nM, 1 nM and 10 nM had a similar effect on responses to sumatriptan. 4. The 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin (10 nM, 100 nM and 1 microM) also reduced the maximum contractile response to both 5-HT and sumatriptan without affecting tissue sensitivity to these agonists. 5. The novel 5-HT1D receptor antagonist, GR55562, inhibited responses to 5-HT and sumatriptan in a true competitive fashion. 6. The results suggest that the human pulmonary artery has a functional population of 5-HT1D-like receptors which are involved in the contractile response to 5-HT.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗
PubMed2000

Migraine pharmacotherapy with oral triptans: a rational approach to clinical management.

The recent clinical development of a number of migraine specific 5-HT1B/1D agonist triptans with enhanced lipophilicity (TELs), relative to the first drug of this class sumatriptan, and with a range of different metabolic, pharmacokinetic and receptor affinity profiles, provides the potential for critically different clinical profiles. Eletriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan and zolmitriptan display both increased stability to first pass metabolic inactivation by monoamine oxidase (MAO-A) and enhanced lipophilicity (4- to > 120-fold more than sumatriptan), leading to increased oral bioavailability (2- to 5-fold more than the 14% reported for oral sumatriptan). Central penetration and increased receptor affinity and selectivity for the neuronal (5-HT1D) receptor also combine to allow for lower total oral dosing (i.e., unit doses of 15 mg or less compared with 50-300 mg doses of sumatriptan) and reduced peripheral exposure to the coronary vasoconstrictor (5-HT1B) receptor. The notable exception being eletriptan, where an active P-glycoprotein blood-brain barrier efflux system effectively negates these benefits and requires an 80 mg oral dose. Differences in the metabolic balance between hepatic P450 (especially CYP 1A2) and MAO-A inactivation lead to potential drug interactions for all TELs with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP), fluvoxamine and the quinilone antibiotics (with increased triptan levels). An important but complex MAO-A interaction between a metabolite of propranolol and rizatriptan mandates dosage reduction (to 5 mg) for rizatriptan in the presence of propranolol treatment. There is also an absolute contraindication for the concurrent administration of the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide and rizatriptan. All the new-marketed TELs have potential clinical benefits and were well-tolerated relative to sumatriptan. Both rizatriptan (10 mg) and zolmitriptan (2.5 mg and 5 mg) demonstrate at least equivalent efficacy to sumatriptan 25, 50 and 100 mg, respectively, making them suitable first line agents for moderate or severe migraine headaches. Rizatriptan has the fastest onset of effect of the TELs. Naratriptan would appear to have lower recurrent headache rate than sumatriptan, rizatriptan or zolmitriptan. Therefore, for headaches of long duration and with a tendency to recur naratriptan may be the most appropriate treatment. Thus, knowledge of the metabolic, pharmacokinetic and clinical profiles of the TELs facilitates the selection of a triptan which allows optimisation of the clinical benefits for individual patients, minimising the risk of drug interactions and a minimally effective dose to reduce potential adverse events (AEs).

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1993

The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats.

Both clinical and physiological consideration of migraine suggests that the pathophysiology of the syndrome is intimately linked to the trigeminal innervation of the cranial vessels, the trigeminovascular system. Studies were conducted in cats and humans to examine the interaction of these systems with the effective acute antimigraine drugs dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan. In the animal studies cats were anesthetized and prepared for routine physiological monitoring as well as for blood sampling from the external jugular veins. Cerebral blood flow was monitored continuously using laser Doppler flowmetry and the effect of trigeminal ganglion stimulation on both cerebral blood flow and jugular vein peptide levels determined prior to and after administration of either sumatriptan or dihydroergotamine. Stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion led to a frequency-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow, with a mean maximum of 43 +/- 9% at a stimulus frequency of 20 per second. There was a marked reduction in these responses by some 50% after administration of either sumatriptan or dihydroergotamine. Trigeminal ganglion stimulation at a frequency of 5 per second also led to a release into the cranial circulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), with the level rising from 67 +/- 3 to 82 +/- 5 pmol/liter on the side of stimulation. These increases were also markedly antagonized by both sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine. Human studies were conducted as part of the overall evaluation of sumatriptan for the treatment of acute migraine. In 7 of 8 patients responding to subcutaneous sumatriptan administration, elevated CGRP levels (60 +/- 8 pmol/liter) were normalized, with the headache being relieved (40 +/- 8 pmol/liter).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Gastric motor effects of triptans: open questions and future perspectives.

Sumatriptan is a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist of documented efficacy in relieving migraine and associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. In the past decade, several studies reported an important delay of gastric emptying induced by sumatriptan in healthy humans. The impact of this gastric motor effect of sumatriptan in migraineurs is difficult to predict: a further delay in gastric emptying could be detrimental (i.e. increased nausea and epigastric symptoms) in patients already having delayed gastric emptying. However, in patients with functional dyspepsia, sumatriptan is also reported to improve gastric accommodation to a meal and reduce perception of gastric distention, hence relieving epigastric symptoms. Thus, reduced visceral perception could be a mechanism involved in reducing nausea during a migraine attack. Paradoxically, sumatriptan is reported both to relieve the nausea of a migraine attack and to have nausea as a side effect. Although careful analysis of the time of onset of nausea may offer a clue as to the origin of this symptom, available data do not support definite conclusions, all the more so because the gastric motor effect of second-generation triptans are still unexplored. Taken together, the available evidence warrants further studies to clarify the following issues: first, the mechanism responsible for the gastric motor effect of sumatriptan [receptor subtype(s) involved; central vs peripheral mechanism]; secondly, the effects on gastric motility/visceral sensitivity of second-generation triptans (which are 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists) and more recent selective 5-HT1D receptor agonists (proposed as investigational antimigraine agents with less potential to induce coronary vasoconstriction through 5-HT1B receptors); finally, the possible use of drugs improving gastric accommodation to a meal in the management of those dyspeptic patients with impaired fundic relaxation/altered visceral sensitivity.

Forecasting↗
PubMed1994

5-HT1-receptor-mediated vasoconstriction in bovine isolated pulmonary arteries: influences of vascular endothelium and tone.

Vasoconstrictor responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and the 5-HT1D receptor agonist sumatriptan were studied in isolated bovine pulmonary artery rings. The effects of the antagonists, ketanserin (5-HT2A-receptors) and methiothepin (5-HT1- and 5-HT2A-receptors) on these responses were determined. The influences of vascular tone and the effect of removal of the vascular endothelium and pretreatment with the inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, N omega-nitro-L-arginine methylester, were also studied. In the absence of tone, in the majority of vessels, sumatriptan did not induce significant contractions. 5-HT-induced responses were concentration-dependent and ketanserin and methiothepin antagonized these in a competitive fashion. Removal of the endothelium or inclusion of L-NAME potentiated responses to sumatriptan. The sensitivity to sumatriptan was increased by L-NAME only in the presence of the endothelium whilst maximum responses to sumatriptan were potentiated in both unrubbed and rubbed vessels. Removal of the endothelium and/or inclusion of L-NAME had no significant effect on responses to 5-HT. U46619-induced tone markedly increased sumatriptan-induced responses which were competitively antagonized by methiothepin but were relatively resistant to ketanserin, verifying activation of a 5-HT1D receptor. Responses to 5-HT were also potentiated and competitively antagonized by ketanserin, and further antagonized by methiothepin. With tone present, lower concentrations of 5-HT were ketanserin-resistant and methiothepin-sensitive, indicating activation of a 5-HT1-like receptor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amino Acid Oxidoreductases↗
PubMed1999

Bovine isolated middle cerebral artery contractions to antimigraine drugs.

Ergot alkaloids, sumatriptan and the newer 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists all contract cranial blood vessels and this effect seems to be primarily responsible for their efficacy in migraine. We have compared the contractile effects of a number of ergot and triptan derivatives on the bovine isolated middle cerebral artery and characterised the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors involved by using 5-HT2A (ketanserin: 10, 30, 100 nM) and 5-HT1B/1D (GR127935: 30, 100, 300 nM) receptor antagonists. The rank order of agonist potency (pD2) was ergotamine (8.0+/-0.1) approximately dihydroergotamine (8.0+/-0.1) > avitriptan (7.4+/-0.3) >5-HT (7.0+/-0.1) > naratriptan (6.8+/-0.1) > methylergometrine (major metabolite of methysergide; 6.5+/-0.2) > rizatriptan (6.3+/-0.3) approximately zolmitriptan (6.2+/-0.1) approximately sumatriptan (6.0+/-0.2) approximately methysergide (5.9+/-0.3). The rank order of efficacy (Emax expressed as % of contraction to 100 mM K+) was 5-HT (127+/-11) > sumatriptan (56+/-5) > ergotamine (48+/-5) approximately dihydroergotamine (44+/-8) approximately methyl-ergometrine (44+/-7) > avitriptan (37+/-7) approximately rizatriptan (33+/-5) approximately methysergide (29+/-10) approximately zolmitriptan (28+/-3) approximately naratriptan (23+/-2). The concentration-response curve to 5-HT appeared to be biphasic in the presence of 100 nM ketanserin, which hardly affected sumatriptan-induced contractions, but clearly antagonised the second more efficacious phase of the curve to 5-HT. On the other hand, GR127935 caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curves to 5-HT (in the presence of 10 microM ketanserin) and sumatriptan with pA2 values of 7.0 and 8.1, respectively. In conclusion, all acutely acting antimigraine drugs contract the bovine isolated middle cerebral artery. Whereas sumatriptan contracts the artery via the 5-HT1B/1D receptor, the 5-HT-induced contraction is mediated partly by the 5-HT2A receptor and partly by another, possibly novel receptor differing from the 5-HT1B/1D receptor. This receptor may be a target for the development of future antimigraine drugs.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Triptans and gastric accommodation: pharmacological and therapeutic aspects.

In the past decade, several studies have reported a significant delay of gastric emptying induced by the anti-migraine agent sumatriptan (a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B/D receptor agonist) in healthy human beings. In patients with functional dyspepsia, sumatriptan improves gastric accommodation after food consumption and reduce perception of gastric distension, hence relieving epigastric symptoms. Recent studies have established that impaired accommodation after food consumption is a major patho-physiological mechanism in functional dyspepsia and restoration of accommodation is considered to be a potential therapeutic target. The precise site of action of sumatriptan in humans is at present unknown, although recent studies carried out using a canine model indicate that sumatriptan exerts its action on gastric accommodation through 5-HT1B receptors, since both GR127935 and SB216641 (respectively, non selective 5-HT1B/D and selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonists) fully antagonised the effects of sumatriptan. Gastric relaxation and enhanced accommodation to a distending stimulus seem to be a class effect of triptans, since it occurs not only with sumatriptan, but also with second-generation triptans (rizatriptan and naratriptan), at least in a canine model. In dyspeptic patients, administration of triptans would be able to restore gastric accommodation after a meal and to improve symptoms of early satiety, confirming the therapeutic potential of 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists in functional dyspepsia.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

The in vivo pharmacological profile of eletriptan (UK-116,044): a potent and novel 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist.

The anti-migraine drug, eletriptan [(R)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-5-[2-(phenylsulphonyl )ethyl]-1 H-indole; UK-116,044], is a novel 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist. In this paper, the regional vasoconstrictor profile of eletriptan, in comparison with sumatriptan, was examined in the anaesthetised dog. The inhibitory actions of eletriptan on neurogenic inflammation in rat dura mater were also assessed. In the anaesthetised dog, eletriptan (1-1000 microg kg(-1) i.v.) produced a dose-dependent reduction of carotid arterial blood flow with a similar potency and maximum effect to sumatriptan (ED(50) values: eletriptan and sumatriptan, 12 and 9 microg kg(-1), i.v., respectively). However, eletriptan exhibited a significantly lower potency than sumatriptan in reducing coronary artery diameter (ED(50) values: 63 and 19 microg kg(-1), i.v., respectively, P<0.05). In the femoral circulation, sumatriptan caused a significant reduction in arterial blood flow (ED(50) 35 microg kg(-1) i.v.) whereas eletriptan (1-1000 microg kg(-1) i.v.) had no significant effect upon femoral arterial blood flow when compared to vehicle-treated animals. In rats, eletriptan (30-300 microg kg(-1) i.v.) administered prior to electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion produced a dose-related and complete inhibition of plasma protein extravasation in the dura mater (mean extravasation ratio: control 1.9; eletriptan 1.0, minimum effective dose 100 microg kg(-1), P<0.05). The potency and maximum effect of eletriptan was identical to that of sumatriptan in this model. When administered during a period of continual stimulation of the trigeminal nerve, eletriptan (100 microg kg(-1) i.v.) produced a complete inhibition of plasma protein extravasation. The ability to reduce canine carotid arterial blood flow and inhibit neurogenic inflammation in rat dura mater suggests that vascular and neurogenic mechanisms may contribute to eletriptan's clinical efficacy in migraine patients. In addition, eletriptan exhibits some selectivity for reducing carotid arterial blood flow when compared with femoral arterial blood flow and coronary artery diameter, in the anaesthetised dog.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1999

Characterisation of the 5-HT receptor binding profile of eletriptan and kinetics of [3H]eletriptan binding at human 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors.

The affinity of eletriptan ((R)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-5-[2-(phenylsulphonyl )ethyl]-1H-indole) for a range of 5-HT receptors was compared to values obtained for other 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists known to be effective in the treatment of migraine. Eletriptan, like sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan and rizatriptan had highest affinity for the human 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D and putative 5-ht1f receptor. Kinetic studies comparing the binding of [3H]eletriptan and [3H]sumatriptan to the human recombinant 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors expressed in HeLa cells revealed that both radioligands bound with high specificity (>90%) and reached equilibrium within 10-15 min. However, [3H]eletriptan had over 6-fold higher affinity than [3H]sumatriptan at the 5-HT1D receptor (K(D)): 0.92 and 6.58 nM, respectively) and over 3-fold higher affinity than [3H]sumatriptan at the 5-HT1B receptor (K(D): 3.14 and 11.07 nM, respectively). Association and dissociation rates for both radioligands could only be accurately determined at the 5-HT1D receptor and then only at 4 degrees C. At this temperature, [3H]eletriptan had a significantly (P<0.05) faster association rate (K(on) 0.249 min(-1) nM(-1)) than [3H]sumatriptan (K(on) 0.024 min(-1) nM(-1)) and a significantly (P<0.05) slower off-rate (K(off) 0.027 min(-1) compared to 0.037 min(-1) for [3H]sumatriptan). These data indicate that eletriptan is a potent ligand at the human 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, and 5-ht1f receptors and are consistent with its potent vasoconstrictor activity and use as a drug for the acute treatment of migraine headache.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Both 5-HT1B and 5-HT1F receptors modulate c-fos expression within rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis.

A possible mechanism of action of antimigraine drugs such as sumatriptan is inhibition of the trigeminovascular pathway. Sumatriptan's effects might be mediated by 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D or 5-HT1F receptors. To establish the relative importance of these subtypes, we compared the effects of sumatriptan with those of a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist (LY 344864) on c-fos protein expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. c-fos expression was induced in urethane-anaesthetized rats by intracisternal capsaicin administration. Sumatriptan and LY 344864 decreased the number of capsaicin-induced c-fos-like immunoreactive cells within trigeminal nucleus caudalis (ID50 = 0.04 and 0.6 mg kg(-1)). The effect of sumatriptan, but not of LY 344864, was prevented by pretreatment with the antagonist SDZ 21-009, which displays high affinity for rat 5-HT1B receptors. LY 344864 appears to attenuate c-fos-like immunoreactivity via 5-HT1F receptors, while sumatriptan acts via 5-HT1B receptors. The fact that activation of 5-HT1F receptors is sufficient to modulate the activity of the trigeminal system suggests that this receptor may be a target for antimigraine drugs with improved safety profile.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗