Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Outcome and management of patients with large rectoanal intussusception.

OBJECTIVES: Rectoanal intussusception is the funnel-shaped infolding of the rectum, which occurs during evacuation. The aims of this study were to evaluate the risk of full thickness rectal prolapse during follow-up of patients with large rectoanal intussusception, and whether therapy improved functional outcome. METHODS: Between September 1988 and July 1997, patients diagnosed with a large rectoanal intussusception by cinedefecography (intussusception > or = 10 mm, extending into the anal canal) were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with full thickness rectal prolapse on physical examination or cinedefecography were excluded, as were patients with colonic inertia or a history of surgery for rectal prolapse. The patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment received: group I, conservative dietary therapy; group II, biofeedback; and group III, surgery. Outcomes were obtained by postal questionnaires or telephone interviews. Parameters included age, gender, past medical and surgical history, change of bowel habits, fecal incontinence score, and development of full thickness rectal prolapse. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients, 18 were excluded (seven patients had confirmed full thickness rectal prolapse, four had previous surgery for rectal prolapse, three had colonic inertia, and four died). Follow-up data were obtained in 36 (80%) of the remaining 45 patients. The mean follow-up of this group was 45 months (range, 12-118 months). There were 34 women and two men, with a mean age of 72.4 yr (range, 37-91 yr). The mean size of the intussusception was 2.2 cm (range, 1.0-5.0 cm). The patients were classified as follows: group I, 13 patients (36.1%); group II, 13 patients (36.1%); and group III, 10 patients (27.8%). Subjectively, symptoms improved in five (38.5%), four (30.8%), and six (60.0%) patients in the three groups (p > 0.05). Among the patients with constipation, the decrease in numbers of assisted bowel movements per week (time of diagnosis to present) was significantly greater in group II compared to group 1 (8.1+/-2.8 vs 0.8+/-0.5, respectively, p = 0.004). Among the patients with incontinence, incontinence scores improved more in group II as compared to either group I or group III (time of diagnosis to present, 3.7+/-4.2 to 1.1+/-5.4 vs 1.4+/-2.2, respectively, p > 0.05). Six patients (two in group I, three in group II, and one in group III) had the sensation of rectal prolapse on evacuation; however, only one patient in group I developed full thickness rectal prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the risk of full thickness rectal prolapse developing in patients medically treated for large intussusception is very small (1/26, 3.8%). Moreover, biofeedback is beneficial to improve the symptoms of both constipation and incontinence in these patients. Therefore, biofeedback should be considered as the initial therapy of choice for large rectoanal intussusception.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a series of 13 patients operated with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an infrequent pathology often associated with pelvic floor disorders. The aim of this retrospective study was to review the long-term results of a surgical series of SRUS. Between 1988 and 1998, 13 patients were operated on for SRUS. Seven patients had associated internal rectal prolapse (58%), two had associated total rectal prolapse (15%), and two had associated mucosal prolapse (15%). We performed simple resection of the SRUS in one case (8%), a stoma as primary operation in one (8%), three rectopexies according to Orr-Loygue (23%), and eight Delorme's operations as modified by Berman (62%). Mean follow-up was 57 months (range 15-112). Simple resection of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome did not improve symptoms. Colostomy permitted relief of symptoms and healing of the SRUS. Two of the three rectopexies achieved good results, and the third patient relapsed at the 6th postoperative month. A secondary modified Delorme's operation permitted relief of symptoms and healing of the SRUS. Five of the eight patients (62.5%) who received modified Delorme's operations had improved at a follow-up of 46 months. We conclude that, considering the high failure rate after surgery, operations should be performed only in patients with total rectal prolapse or intractable symptoms not amenable to behavioral therapy. Delorme's operation and abdominal rectopexy help in about 60% of cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Treatment of rectal mucosal prolapse with radiofrequency coagulation and plication--a new surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the outcome of using a new technique of mucosal ablation using a radiofrequency device followed by its plication for rectal mucosal prolapse and to compare the results with those under the conventional ligature and excision procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure of radiofrequency ablation and mucosal plication (RAMP) is described. A Ellman radiofrequency generator was used for the procedure. Out of the 46 patients with rectal mucosal prolapse, 24 patients were randomized to undergo ligature and excision procedure (LEP) and 22 were operated with RAMP. The operating time, amount of pain (VAS scale)[Primary end points], postoperative analgesic requirement, time to return to work, wound healing period and postoperative complications were documented. RESULTS: Radiofrequency ablation and mucosal plication procedure on an average resulted in shorter operation time (9 vs. 32 minutes, p < 0.0001), shorter hospitalization (16 vs. 42 hours, p < 0.0001) significantly lesser postoperative pain, fewer cumulative requests for analgesia by the patients (21 vs. 54 tablets, p < 0.0001), earlier return to work (7 vs. 18 days, p < 0.0001) and faster wound healing time (14 vs. 35 days, p < 0.0001). The complication rate was 9 % with RAMP group and 29 % with LEP group. CONCLUSION: The procedure of radiofrequency ablation and plication of mucosa shows promising results in patients with rectal mucosal prolapse. Being safe, effective, and a swift technique, it can be proposed as an improved alternative to conventional surgical procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to analyze the frequency of different findings at defecography in patients with defecation disorders and see in what way the evaluation could be improved. METHODS: The reports of investigations in 2,816 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of the investigations were considered normal. Thirty-one percent of the patients had rectal intussusception, 13 percent had rectal prolapse, 27 percent had rectocele, and 19 percent had enterocele. Twenty-one percent of the patients had a combination of two or three of these diagnoses. The combination of rectocele and enterocele was rare. The majority of patients with enterocele had other concomitant findings. Patients with or without abnormal perineal descent had similar frequencies of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, and enterocele. Rectocele was more common in patients with abnormal perineal descent. CONCLUSIONS: Defecography is valuable when investigating patients with defecation disorders. Pathologic findings were found in 77 percent of the patients. A standardized protocol should ensure a complete evaluation of defecography.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Enterocele: clinical risk factors and association with others pelvic floor disorders (about 544 defecographies)].

OBJECTIVE: To study, by means of defecography, clinical risk factors of enterocele and association with others pelvic floor disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and forty-four consecutive female patients were investigated by colpocystodefecography with contrast medium in the small bowel. One hundred and thirty-six women with enterocele were compared to 408 women without enterocele. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, obstetrical history (parity, foetal macrosomia, instrumental extractions or perineal tear to delivery) between the two groups. More women with enteroceles had histories of hysterectomies (60% versus 24%) or cystopexies (29% versus 13%). Others pelvic floor disorders were associated in 91% of enterocele: rectocele (25%), cystocele (42%), uterine prolapse (28%), rectal intussusception (52%), rectal prolapse (4%) and abnormal perineal descent (30%). Stress urinary incontinence was significantly more frequent in women without enterocele. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The study has demonstrated that previous hysterectomy and cystopexy increased the risk of enterocele formation and that enterocele and others pelvic floor disorders are often concomitant. Enterocele may have a pessary effect on urinary disorders. Results of colpocystodefecography reinforce the notion of pelvic floor local disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Peritoneocele. A radiological study with defaeco-peritoneography.

REPORT STUDY: Defaecography reports from 2816 patients were evaluated. Twenty-three percent of the investigations were considered normal, 31% showed rectal intussusception, 13% rectal prolapse, 27% rectocele, and 19% enterocele. A standardised protocol is suggested to ensure a complete evaluation of defaecography. One hundred and ten reports were unclear and reviewed. The unclear reports usually concerned an unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space, and gave incitement to further studies. TECHNIQUE STUDY: Twelve patients with an unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space at defaecography were investigated using defaecography and peritoneography simultaneously, by us named defaeco-peritoneography. All investigations were carried out without complications. Defaeco-peritoneography proved the unexplained widening to be an extension of the pouch of Douglas, a peritoneocele. UNEXPLAINED WIDENING STUDY: Twenty-two patients with unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space noted at defaecography were studied using defaeco-peritoneography. The outline and movements of the peritoneum in the pelvic cavity could be visualised during the dynamic act of defaecation. The unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space was caused completely by a peritoneocele in 14 patients, partially in 6 patients and 2 remained unexplained. However, only 9 out of 22 widenings were peritoneoceles with an enterocele. Just 11 peritoneoceles only contained fluid. Three types of peritoneocele were demonstrated: vaginal, septal, and rectal, with or without enterocele. Combinations of these were also found. RECTAL INTUSSUSCEPTION STUDY: Fifty-seven patients with defaecation disorders were examined using defaeco-peritoneography. Twenty-three patients had rectal intussusception and 7 patients had a rectal prolapse. All these patients had a rectal peritoneocele in the serosal ring-pocket of the rectal intussusception or in the rectal prolapse. Twenty-seven patients had neither rectal intussusception nor rectal prolapse and none of these patients had a rectal peritoneocele. DAILY LIFE STUDY: Twenty-six female patients showing peritoneocele without a contrast-filled rectum at start at defaeco-peritoneography were investigated; 13 of them had enteroceles. Spot radiographs before and after filling the rectum with contrast medium were compared. The peritoneocele disappeared completely in 19 of the patients and was reduced in size in the remaining 7, and the enterocele disappeared completely when the rectum was distended. Defaeco-peritoneography should therefore include a radiograph before the rectum is filled, as it shows the habitual (daily life) anatomy and can disclose pathology as peritoneocele and enterocele. TRANSFORMATION STUDY: Forty-six patients with peritoneocele at defaeco-peritoneography were studied at three different stages during rectal evacuation. At start with contrast-filled rectum, 14 patients had a peritoneocele, and 32 were regarded as normal. At maximum straining, all patients had a peritoneocele and 20 of these were still present after rectal evacuation. The peritoneoceles were largest at straining and rectal types were most common. No enterocele was seen at start. At maximum straining, 21 patients developed an enterocele.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients.

PURPOSE: Radiographic imaging of dynamic changes within the pelvic cavity and rectum during evacuation has been recognized as a valuable method of assessment. This study was designed to assess the incidence and clinical significance of defecographic findings in patients with possible evacuation disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All defecographic studies were reviewed by a single colorectal surgeon familiar with patients' histories and physical findings. RESULTS: Between July 1988 and July 1995, 744 patients (566 females and 178 males) with a mean age of 63.5 (range, 12-95) years had defecographic and proctographic examination. Four hundred forty-six (60 percent) patients were diagnosed who complained of constipation, 123 (16.5 percent) of fecal incontinence, 42 (5.6 percent) of rectal prolapse, 82 (11 percent) of rectal pain, and 51 (6.9 percent) had a combination of more than one of these diagnoses. Although 93 (12.5 percent) of these evaluations were considered normal, 61 (8 percent) revealed rectal prolapse, 191 (25.7 percent) rectocele, 82 (11 percent) sigmoidocele, and 94 (12.6 percent) intussusception; in 223 (30 percent) patients, a combination of these findings was noted. Patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction had an extremely high frequency of constipation compared with other symptoms (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Defecography can reveal abnormalities in the majority of patients with evacuatory disorders. There was a high incidence of rectocele, sigmoidocele, and intussusception. Care must be taken not to treat patients strictly based on radiographic findings.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): a review of physiology, technique and outcome.

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure), as used for the surgical treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse, has a long history. The physiological derangement in patients with rectal prolapse is complex, frequently showing impairment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, intermittent high-pressure rectal motor activity, disturbances in anorectal sampling and attendant pudendal neuropathy. There are currently few defined preoperative factors in patients presenting with rectal prolapse and fecal leakage which predict for the restoration of continence after surgery. This review describes our technique of Altemeier's procedure and analyzes the reported results of this operation, presenting those studies which assessed postoperative continence and prolapse recurrence in particular. The lack of prospective randomized data regarding this perineal approach makes clinical interpretation difficult at the present time.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Pathophysiology and treatment of anterior rectal mucosal prolapse syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The study was designed to investigate the clinical presentation and laboratory findings of anterior rectal mucosal prolapse (ARMP) and to assess the results of two therapeutic modalities. METHODS: Some 162 women with ARMP were assessed clinically and by defaecography and rectoanal manometry before and 1 year after one or two sessions of submucosal sclerotherapy or, in the case of recurrence, after transanal excision of the prolapsing mucosa. RESULTS: Almost all patients reported a combination of symptoms suggesting obstructive defaecation. At defaecography anterior rectocele and excessive perineal descent at straining were present in 78 and 72 per cent respectively. The size of coexisting anterior rectocele and the extent of perineal descent were significantly related to the duration of the disease (P< 0.001). One or, in the event of recurrence, two sessions of sclerotherapy led to an overall success rate of 51 per cent. Improvement after sclerotherapy was associated with partial recovery of anal tone and improvement of anal sampling and rectal sensation. Failure of sclerotherapy was related to rectocele of larger size (P< 0.001) and a longer perineal descent at straining (P< 0.001) than in patients with a successful outcome. Excision of the prolapsing mucosa resulted in symptomatic improvement in 42 of 47 patients and was associated with significant improvement of the defaecographic and manometric findings. CONCLUSION: ARMP is usually associated with anterior rectocele and excessive perineal descent. Submucosal sclerotherapy is successful in half of the cases, but only in the presence of a rather small anterior rectocele and short perineal descent. Failures after sclerotherapy can be treated by transanal excision of the prolapsing mucosa.

Defecation↗
PubMed2005

The place of the posterior surgical approach for lesions of the rectum.

BACKGROUND: Although there are many advantages of a posterior approach to rectal disease, these procedures are not widely accepted because many surgeons fear the postoperative complications. METHODS: The medical records were reviewed of 57 patients who underwent a posterior approach to the rectum between January 1980 and December 2002. RESULTS: Twenty-eight men and 29 women with a mean age of 70.5 (range 47-83) years underwent either a posterior transsacral (n = 52) or a transsphincteric (n = 5) procedure. Indications for surgery were benign lesions (n = 33), e.g. villous adenoma, rectal prolapse and endometriosis as well as invasive adenocarcinoma (n = 24). All patients with an invasive adenocarcinoma were classified as ASA grade III or IV. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 12 patients (21%), consisting of temporary incontinence, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and hemorrhage. There was no mortality. During a mean follow-up of 29 (range 2-86) months, 3 patients with a villous adenoma and 2 patients who were treated for a malignant lesion had a locally recurrent lesion. CONCLUSION: We believe that a posterior approach to the rectum should be considered for various benign and selected malignant diseases, especially in case of elderly patients or patients with a compromised general condition, and has to be a part of the surgeon's armamentarium.

Adenoma, Villous↗
PubMed1991

Gastroenterological options in faecal incontinence.

Faecal incontinence may be due to a trauma, a rectal prolapse, or a neurological disorder. Obstetric trauma: If the sphincter has been severed, direct repair is indicated. In the case of neurological damage, plication of the levators can provide significant improvement; while the post-anal repair has become popular, anterior sphincter plication and levatorplasty, provide equivalent results. Rectal prolapse: Full thickness rectal prolapse is frequently associated with incontinence. Two categories of operations have been described: local operative procedures (Delorme's plicature, perineal resection) provide poor results in term of restoration of continence and should be reserved to unfit and elderly patients; abdominal operations combine an extensive rectal mobilisation and they differ by the type of fixation. The Ripstein operation (fixation to the promontory by an encircling sling of non absorbable mesh) has long been popular in the United States, but is followed by severe constipation. In the simple suture rectopexy, the rectum is fixed to the pelvic floor and the presacral fascia by non absorbable procedures. In the Ivalon sponge rectoprexy, a polyvinyl alcohol mesh in secured between the sacrum and the rectum, and provides a dense fibrous reaction. In the antero-posterior Marlex rectopexy, a sheet of Marlex mesh is fixed posteriorly to the rectum, and a sling is interposed anteriorly in order to support the anterior wall. In the resection rectopexy, a sigmoid resection in added to the rectal fixation in order to suppress the redundant sigmoid which is responsible for the constipation frequently following rectopexy. Results of abdominal rectopexy are satisfactory in terms of recurrence and restoration of continence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

[Rectopexy to the left inguinal ligament. Technique and preliminary results].

We report the procedure and the results of a new surgical technique for adult rectal prolapse by left inguinal ligament rectopexy. Seven patients were operated on, and presented with total rectal prolapse (n = 6) or internal procidentia associated with a solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (n = 1). Mean follow-up was 64 months (56-78 months). One patient experienced a postoperative complication: a regressive temporary dysesthesia of the left lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Three patients had mild postoperative constipation. There was no recurrence. Preliminary results show that it is a suitable procedure. It may be successfully applied to the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal procidentia complicated by a solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, particularly when the use of synthetic material is precluded after a rectal wound. Further studies are required to confirm these preliminary results.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Perineal excision of rectal procidentia in elderly high-risk patients. A ten-year experience.

PURPOSE: This report presents a ten-year experience with perineal excision and posterior levator ani repair in elderly, high-risk patients with complete rectal procidentia. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with rectal prolapse were treated with perineal excision. Nine presented with acute incarcerated rectal prolapse. Mortality, morbidity, recurrence rates, and improvement of anal continence were assessed. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 5.5 percent. Improvement in anal continence was seen in 66.7 percent of patients. Morbidity and mortality was low. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal excision of rectal prolapse is safe and has a low recurrence rate. Posterior levator ani repair seems to improve anal continence.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Selection criteria for anterior rectal wall repair in symptomatic rectocele and anterior rectal wall prolapse.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the outcome and changes produced by an endorectal anterior wall repair in objective functional parameters using anorectal manometry and defecography and to asses their usefulness in the selection of patients for the operation. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1990, we performed a prospective study of 76 consecutive patients with symptomatic rectocele and/or an anterior rectal wall prolapse. All patients were studied prospectively according to a fixed protocol. Standard questionnaire, defecation diary, clinical examination, defecography, and anal manometry were performed preoperatively and three to four months postoperatively. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, 38 patients (50 percent) had no complaints at all (excellent result), 32 (42 percent) had only a minor complaint (good result), and in 6 patients (8 percent) the complaints were essentially unchanged (unsatisfactory result). After one year, similar figures were obtained. The postoperative mean stool frequency in all patients after three months was significantly increased (P < 0.05) but not after one year. Postoperative defecographies showed a complete absence or significant diminution of the rectocele at three months and were significantly correlated with relief of symptoms. An inverse correlation was found between improvement in incontinence grade after operation and (larger) preoperative volume at which urge to defecate was elicited, making it a good predictor of improvement in incontinence by the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior rectal wall repair positively influences rectal sensation in patients with incontinence and/or obstructed defecation caused by a rectocele and/or an anterior rectal wall prolapse. Anorectal manometry was useful in studying the beneficial physiologic effects of the endorectal repair. In patients with no previous pelvic surgery, a large urge to defecate volume is a good predictor of a good clinical outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[The use of anorectal manometry and dynamic proctography in patients for diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome].

BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is caused by rectal prolapse and/or anismus. The diagnosis by physical examination, or using endoscopy or radiology alone is difficult. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of videoproctography and anorectal manometry in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied six patients (5 women/1 man; 21-66 years) with rectal lesions suggestive of solitary rectal ulcer. By videoproctography, we measured the changes in the anorectal angle and the shape of the rectal wall during voiding. By manometry, we measured the resting pressure of the anal canal, and the pressure during maximal voluntary contraction and during straining. RESULTS: Proctography showed a rectal prolapse in 5 patients (non-exteriorized in 4). Both manometry and proctography demonstrated the normal relaxation of puborectalis and external sphincter during straining in 4 patients, manometry found sphincteric weakness in two of these patients. Both manometry and proctography evidenced anismus in a patient with rectal prolapse. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of rectal prolapse in our patients allows us to recommend proctography in patients with morphological lesions suggestive of solitary rectal ulcer. The manometric examination identifies patients at risk of developing incontinence. Both techniques contribute to ascertain the presence of anismus and are indispensable in the selection of the adequate treatment for patients with solitary rectal ulcer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation and outcome of the delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the results of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of patients with rectal outlet obstruction. METHODS: A descriptive retrospective study from October 1989 to October 1997 was undertaken. Thirty-four patients with an abnormal defecography documenting rectal outlet obstruction caused by internal rectal prolapse or a combination of internal rectal prolapse and rectocele were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (33 females) ages 35 to 82 (mean, 61.4) years were followed up for the duration of the study (mean follow-up, 43 months). Twenty-six patients (76.4 percent) reported a good to excellent overall result after the Delorme procedure. Eight patients (23.6 percent) reported fair to poor results. Symptomatic improvement was observed in 89.7 percent for patients who had incomplete evacuation, and in 88.5 percent of patients who had constipation. There was improvement in 78.6 percent of patients with bleeding per rectum, in 92.9 percent of patients with straining, and in 82.4 percent of patients with the need to manually assist in defecation by pushing in the perineum or vagina. Discontinuation of laxative use after the procedure was reported by 66.7 percent of patients. Improvement in the patients with some degree of incontinence was seen in 33.3 percent. Twelve patients (35.3 percent) experienced one or more complications. The procedure was performed in an outpatient setting in 71 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Delorme procedure for the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction can be done with minimal morbidity, short hospital stay often in an outpatient setting, with good functional results, and with an overall patient satisfaction above 75 percent.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1993

Rectopexy.

Many surgical procedures have been described for the management of full-thickness rectal prolapse. Currently, the three procedures most frequently used are anterior resection with or without suture rectopexy, transabdominal mesh fixation without resection, and perineal proctosigmoidectomy. Only the latter procedure avoids a laparotomy, and the mesh fixation technique has a high incidence of severe constipation postoperatively. Recently, there have been two reports of laparoscopic mesh fixation for rectal prolapse which were successful. However, the long-term concerns are probably very similar. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to report a series of 6 laparoscopic-assisted anterior resections performed for rectal prolapse at Ferguson-Blodgett Hospital from January 1, 1992 through October 30, 1992. There were no perioperative mortalities and the only complication was a port site bleed which required re-exploration. The mean time for resumption of oral intake was 2.75 +/- 1.5 days and the length of hospital stay was 4.0 +/- 0.8 days. No early recurrences (< 1 yr) have been noted in this series. The authors feel that laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection is a safe and effective method of treating full-thickness rectal prolapse, thereby avoiding a laparotomy and reducing hospital stay.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

[Intestinal prolapse and/or fecal incontinence: therapy possibilities].

Many patients with rectal prolapse and/or fecal incontinence could be helped if they disclosed the ailment to their physician. Thirteen out of 23 patients underwent transabdominal rectopexy and remained recurrence-free, whereas only one out of 10 anal cerclages brought relief of symptoms. Simultaneous incontinence was also eliminated in most cases by rectopexy. Thirty-one patients with incontinence in the absence of traumatic sphincter lesions or urgency grade 2 were treated either by voluntary training of the pelvic floor muscles in combination with faradic stimulation, or by postanal repair. Fifteen patients regained continence or showed some improvement. Thirteen of the remaining 16 patients were healed or improved after postanal repair. The authors therefore recommend transabdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. In cases of simultaneous incontinence the rectopexy should be performed first. If a course of training of the pelvic floor muscles produces no improvement, postanal repair is advisable.

Adult↗