Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Questionnaires”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources

[Tools for the assessment of tobacco dependence: comparison with questionnaires and marker assays].

Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire has been questioned in some respects for the purpose of the evaluation of tobacco dependence. In a sample of 208 smokers attempting to quit, we measured on urinary samples the levels of nicotine metabolites via their thiobarbituric acid derivatives comparatively to the levels of nicotine and cotinine by high performance liquid chromatography. Urinary concentration of nicotine metabolites was 77.1 +/- 50.0 mumol/l. Nicotine and cotinine levels were respectively 8.2 +/- 12.0 mumol/l and 12.9 +/- 9.8 mumol/l. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationships among various measures of exposure to cigarette smoke, tobacco markers and tobacco addiction scores obtained through the Fagerström Questionnaire and a Simplified Questionnaire. Nicotine metabolites are correlated with the score obtained with the Simplified Questionnaire (rho = 0.39) better than with the score of Fagerström (rho = 0.28) (p < 0.01). These moderate correlations suggest that the measurement of tobacco markers provide a more valuable information than questionnaires for the appreciation of the depth of tobacco intake. The questionnaires should not serve as a substitute for tobacco markers determination.

Adult↗

Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

We developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients having total hip replacement (THR). A prospective study of 220 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each completed the new questionnaire as well as the SF36, and some the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). An orthopaedic surgeon assessed the Charnley hip score. The single score derived from the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. Reproducibility was examined by test-retest reliability and was found to be satisfactory. The validity of the questionnaire was established by obtaining significant correlation in the expected direction with the Charnley scores and relevant scales of the SF36 and the AIMS. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at the follow-up. The standardised effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with that for the SF36 and the AIMS. The new questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for THR which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care services are the most frequently used in the health care system. Consumer feedback on these services is important. Research in this area relates mainly to doctor-patient relationships which fails to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of primary health care. AIM: A pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of using a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed for use with general practitioner consultations as an instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with community nurses. METHOD: The questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner consultations was adapted for measuring satisfaction with contacts with a nurse practitioner, district nurses, practice nurses and health visitors. A total of 1575 patients in three practices consulting general practitioners or community nurses were invited to complete a questionnaire. Data were subjected to principal components analysis and the dimensions identified were tested for internal reliability and replicability. To establish discriminant validity, patients' mean satisfaction scores for consultations with general practitioners, the nurse practitioner, health visitors and nurses (district and practice nurses) were compared. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned relating to 400 general practitioner, 54 nurse practitioner, 191 district/practice nurse and 83 health visitor consultations (overall response rate 46%). Principal components analysis demonstrated a factor structure similar to that found in an earlier study of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire. Three dimensions of patient satisfaction were identified: professional care, depth of relationship and perceived time spent with the health professional. The dimensions were found to have acceptable levels of reliability. Factor structures obtained from data relating to general practitioner and community nurse consultations were found to correlate significantly. Comparison between health professionals showed that patients rated satisfaction with professional care significantly more highly for nurses than for general practitioners and health visitors. Patients' rating of satisfaction with the depth of relationships with health visitors was significantly lower than their ratings of this relationship with the other groups of health professionals. There were so significant differences between health professional groups regarding patients' ratings of satisfaction with the perceived amount of time spent with health professionals. CONCLUSION: The pilot study showed that it is possible to use the consultation satisfaction questionnaire for both general practitioners and community nurses. Comparison between health professional groups should be undertaken with caution as data were available for only a small number of consultations with some of the groups of health professionals studied.

Community Health Nursing↗

[An improved quality of life self-questionnaires specific for head and neck tumors].

The assessment of quality of life is an element that is now taken into account in the evaluation of therapies in oncology and especially for treatments connected with important sequellae. The lack of a specific tool measuring the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancers (H&N), validated in French, leads us to develop and to validate a self-questionnaire. The construction of this questionnaire has been realised following a strict procedure (identification of aspects to explore, formulation and selection of items) conducting to a specific module of 17 questions with 4 modes of reply. The validation of the questionnaire has been undertaken on 116 patients that filled the specific module H&N and the general self-questionnaire QLQ-C30 of the EORTC. The acceptability is excellent since only 4% of the patients have refused to participate to this study and that the number of missing data is very low. The value of the Cronbach alpha coefficient with the global score equal to 0.85, reflects a good reliability of the questionnaire. Global score correlation of the module H&N with the different scales (functional and symptoms) of the QLQ-C30 are coherent. Global scores are correlated to the nature of the treatment (p < 0.001), to the evolution of the disease (p = 0.01), to the tumour site (p = 0.015) but not to the code WHO neither to the performance of a laryngectomy. The whole results indicate that we have a specific tool, reliable, and validated. Associated to a general quality of life questionnaire, this specific tool will be useful to complete the evaluation of therapies, especially during of comparative clinical trials.

Activities of Daily Living↗

[Mail questionnaires. A useful strategy for the follow-up of patients with a cerebrovascular stroke?].

Although not frequently used in Portugal, postal questionnaires allow the collection of information on patient's follow-up. In this study we assessed the rate of response and the usefulness of a postal questionnaire in a sample of patients with acute stroke. A prospective study was designed and analysed as a case-control: postal questionnaires were sent to 138 patients together with a randomly assigned stamped or post-free return envelope. The percentage of responders was 60% (n=78) and we found no significant differences in response rates according to the mailing strategy (58% for stamped and 62% for post-free return envelopes, p = 0.786). The time gap between hospital discharge and sending of the questionnaire had no significant influence in the response rate. Elder patients and women tend to respond more frequently, but these characteristics also do not change the response rate. Analysing socio-demographic variables reported at the acute phase, we only found differences in response rate for the smoking status: smoking was associated with a lower participation. In conclusion, the present study showed that a postal questionnaire is a useful method for the follow-up of stroke cases and that we must pay special attention to smokers for whom alternative strategies of contact or information should be used to increase compliance with postal questionnaire follow-up.

Aged↗

[Prevalence of migraine in a homogeneous population using the self-questionnaire 'Alcoi-1995'].

INTRODUCTION: There are numerous studies of the prevalence of migraine and very varied findings. Amongst the many reasons for this would seem to be the use of questionnaires for screening populations, absent or incorrect validation of these questionnaires and the use of impracticable diagnostic criteria. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of migraine in a homogeneous population using the self-questionnaire 'Alcoi 1995' which had previously been validated for the diagnosis of migraine. A self-questionnaire was given to all workers in the same company. Diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS, 1988) were used for diagnosis of migraine. RESULTS: The study included 140 persons (43.6% men and 56.4% women with an average age of 26.7 +/- 4.8 years). There was a prevalence of headache and migraine (IC 95%): 90.8% (75.01-100) and 24.3% (16.3-32.3) respectively. The sex prevalence of headache and migraine was 88.5% (88.3-88.8) and 11.5% (3.4-19.4) for men and 34.2% (21.5-47) for women respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are a large number of studies of the prevalence of migraine with wide variability in the figures obtained (1-2 at 35%). These variations depend on the population studied, age and sex sampled, diagnostic criteria used and the method employed in the survey. After validation of the questionnaire for diagnosis of migraine, this should be used in homogeneous populations before use in broad population studies. Our findings support the use of a suitably validated questionnaire as a useful method for the diagnosis of migraine in epidemiological studies.

Adolescent↗

Patient education in psoriatic arthritis: a cross sectional study on knowledge by a validated self-administered questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of knowledge in a group of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) following one reading of an information leaflet [UK Arthritis Rheumatism Council (ARC) booklet] using a validated self-administered questionnaire. Comparisons with subsets of the disease and level of general education were also made. METHODS: A multiple choice self-administered questionnaire was carried out in a group of 59 patients (32 male, 27 female, mean age 47.53 +/- 12.71 yrs) with established disease (mean duration 9.6 +/- 8.5 yrs). The questionnaire covered 4 broad areas of the disease (general knowledge of skin and joint disease, etiology, symptoms, blood test; general management and drug therapy; physiotherapy treatments; joint protection and priorities) and it was written collecting the majority of the information from an ARC booklet on PsA and from advice from the rheumatology team. Detailed statistical analysis was performed to validate the questionnaire and to measure any associations with demographic data. RESULTS: The questionnaire was consistent, reliable, and easy to read. Patients showed a lack of knowledge with some erroneous beliefs about their disease (i.e., causes, blood tests, longterm drugs). No statistical associations were found between the level of knowledge achieved and demographic data and patterns of disease. A significant association was found between the median score and level of general education (Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance 7.97, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The questionnaire is a good instrument to assess knowledge in PsA. The ARC booklet alone seems inadequate to provide sufficient knowledge of disease. Patients' erroneous beliefs were highlighted and these should be addressed.

Analysis of Variance↗

[Validation of the Spanish version of the diagnostic questionnaire of the Working Group on Atopic Dermatitis of the United Kingdom].

BACKGROUND: Although there are several diagnostic questionnaires for atopic dermatitis (AD), they have not yet been validated or cannot be used in population studies. Our objective was to validate the questionnaire developed by United Kingdom Working Party's Diagnostic criteria for Atopic Dermatitis (UKWPDCAD). METHODS: Validation was developed in two steps: first, the questionnaire was adapted by means of translation and back-translation. Second, validation was conducted with 237 patients referred to the hospital with diagnoses unknown to the investigators. Patients were independently assessed by the investigators who were blinded to the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 102 cases of AD were diagnosed among the 237 patients. The questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 76.5%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 66.8%-84.1%. The specificity was 90.4% (CI = 83.8%-94.6%); the positive predictive value was 85.7% (CI = 76.4%-91.8%), and the negative predictive value 83.6% (CI = 76.3%-89%). CONCLUSIONS: The spanish version of the questionnaire has shown a high diagnostic accuracy, similar to the original written in english. We consider it a useful tool to be used in frequency studies of AD in large general populations.

Adolescent↗

The development and reliability of the Royal College of General Practitioners' questionnaire for measuring senior house officers' satisfaction with their hospital training.

BACKGROUND: The training provided for senior house officers (SHOs) has been the subject of debate, and variable satisfaction with training has been reported. The reliability of the instruments used for measuring satisfaction has not been adequately addressed. AIM: To develop a reliable questionnaire to measure SHO satisfaction with hospital training. METHOD: A 42-item questionnaire with eight scales was developed using criteria from the joint hospital visiting guidelines of the Royal College of General Practitioners. The questionnaire was sent to SHOs in Anglia before monitoring visits from the royal colleges, the postgraduate dean and the Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice. RESULTS: Response rates varied from 37.0% to 100%, with an overall response rate of 58.8%. The internal reliability of the whole questionnaire was 0.82. Levels of internal reliability for the individual scales were satisfactory, Cronbach's alpha coefficient being 0.75 or more in all but two of the scales. Test-retest reliability using Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient was greater than 0.82 for six of the scales. There were significant differences in total satisfaction between SHOs reporting on posts accredited by the different royal colleges and also between SHOs training for general practice and those training to be specialists. CONCLUSION: A reliable questionnaire has been developed to measure SHO satisfaction with hospital training that is acceptable to doctors and feasible to administer. National acceptance of a single questionnaire for monitoring SHO posts would enable standards to be monitored regularly at a time of considerable change in hospital training.

Consumer Behavior↗

Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q). Validation of a screening instrument for childhood adversity in clinical populations.

BACKGROUND: Interview measures for investigating adverse childhood experiences, such as the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA) instrument, are comprehensive and can be lengthy and time-consuming. A questionnaire version of the CECA (CECA.Q) has been developed which could allow for screening of individuals in research settings. This would enable researchers to identify individuals with adverse early experiences who might benefit from an in-depth interview. This paper aims to validate the CECA.Q against the CECA interview in a clinical population. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients attending an affective disorders service were assessed using both the CECA interview and questionnaire measures. A follow-up sample was recruited 3 years later and sent the questionnaire. The questionnaire was also compared with the established Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). RESULTS: Agreement between ratings on the interview and questionnaire were high. Scales measuring antipathy and neglect also correlated highly with the PBI. The follow-up sample revealed the questionnaire to have a high degree of reliability over a long period of time. CONCLUSIONS: The CECA.Q appears to be a reliable and valid measure which can be used in research on clinical populations to screen for individuals who have experienced severe adversity in childhood.

Adult↗

A comparison of three worry questionnaires.

This paper describes a study comparing three worry questionnaires; The Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ), The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and The Student Worry Scale (SWS). The results suggested that (i) scores on two out of the three questionnaires exhibited sources of variance that were independent of trait anxiety, (ii) content-based questionnaires (the WDQ and SWS) appeared to capture features of task-oriented constructive worrying, whereas the PSWQ did not, and (iii) all three questionnaires indicated that worriers were characterized by an information-seeking, monitoring cognitive style and a tendency to indulge in avoidance coping behaviours. The implications of these findings for the development of a clinically useful diagnostic instrument are discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Self-reports of health-care utilization: diary or questionnaire?

OBJECTIVES: The feasibility and convergent validity of a cost diary and a cost questionnaire was investigated. METHODS: Data were obtained as part of a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter clinical trial in patients with resectable rectal cancer. A sample of 107 patients from 30 hospitals was asked to keep a weekly diary during the first 3 months after surgery, and a monthly diary from 3 to 12 months after surgery. A second sample of seventy-two patients from twenty-eight hospitals in the trial received a questionnaire at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, referring to the previous 3 or 6 months. Format and items of the questions were similar and included a wide range of medical and nonmedical items and costs after hospitalization for surgery. RESULTS: Small differences were found with respect to nonresponse (range, 79 to 86 percent) and missing questions (range, 1 to 6 percent between the diary and questionnaire). For most estimates of volumes of care and of costs, the diary and questionnaire did not differ significantly. Total 3-month nonhospital costs were 1,860 Euros, 1,280 Euros, and 1,050 Euros in the diary sample and 1,860 Euros, 1,090 Euros, and 840 Euros in the questionnaire sample at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, respectively (p = .50). However, with respect to open questions, the diary sample tended to report significantly more care. CONCLUSIONS: For the assessment of health-care utilization in economic evaluations alongside clinical trials, a cost questionnaire with structured closed questions may replace a cost diary for recall periods up to 6 months.

Colectomy↗

Validity of the mood disorder questionnaire: a general population study.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the validity in the adult general population of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, a screening instrument for bipolar I and II disorders. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire has been validated in a psychiatric outpatient study group. METHOD: A total of 711 subjects (stratified by Mood Disorder Questionnaire score) were randomly selected from a group of 85,358 adult respondents in a nationwide epidemiological general population sample that was balanced for key demographic variables. Of these, 695 subjects received a telephone interview involving an abbreviated version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. RESULTS: A sensitivity of 0.281 and a specificity of 0.972 were obtained for the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire is a useful screening instrument for bipolar I and II disorders in the community. The operating characteristics of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire in the general population differ substantially from its characteristics in outpatient psychiatric settings.

Adolescent↗

Food frequency questionnaire versus 7-day weighed dietary record information on dietary fibre and fat intake in middle-aged Swedish men.

To study the magnitude of agreement between a short self-administered food frequency questionnaire and a 7-day weighed dietary record regarding the consumption of fibre and fat, we collected information from 92 randomly selected middle-aged Swedish men. The participants first recorded all foods and drinks consumed over seven consecutive days by means of a digital scale. One month after the 7-day weighed record had been completed, a self-administered food frequency questionnaire on habitual consumption of foods containing fibre or fat during the preceding month was sent to the subjects. The 20 largest contributors of fibre and fat in the diet accounted for 71% and 52% of the total intake, respectively, based on the 7-day weighed record. The estimated mean consumption of fibre was 19.0 grams per day based on the 7-day weighed record and 18.3 grams per day based on the food frequency questionnaire. Corresponding estimated mean consumption of fat was 88.6 grams per day versus 46.9 grams per day. Men with high physical activity and low BMI, respectively, had higher intake of fibre and fat. These differences were seen for both dietary measurement methods but were more marked using the 7-day weighed record. The agreement between methods for each individual was also assessed. Based on five categories of fibre consumption, 61% of the respondents in the highest quintile according to the 7-day weighed record were classified in one of the two highest quintiles according to the food frequency questionnaire. The corresponding figure for fat intake was 56%. We conclude that the short self-administered food frequency questionnaire used in the present study can assess the absolute intake of fibre, but not of fat, with good precision. Also, the ranking of individuals in broad categories of consumption of fibre and fat was not largely misclassified based on this short questionnaire.

Adult↗

Comparison of Two Questionnaires on Respiratory Symptoms in a Nicaraguan Population: Value in Diagnosis of Chronic Bronchitis.

Two questionnaires about respiratory symptoms were evaluated for reliability and ability to diagnose chronic bronchitis in a study population of 129 Nicaraguans (110 workers and 19 patients with chronic bronchitis). The first questionnaire (AQ) had symptom questions that were based on British Medical Research Council (MRC) questions, adapted to local Spanish. The second questionnaire (MRCQ) contained MRC symptom questions translated directly into Spanish. The reliability of the questions was measured in a test-retest procedure. The questionnaire-based diagnosis of chronic bronchitis was compared with the diagnosis made by a physician (for workers) or from the hospital records (for patients). The questions concerning symptoms in both questionnaires were of acceptable reliability. For the diagnosis of chronic bronchitis in workers, the AQ showed similar sensitivity, a somewhat higher specificity, and a substantially higher positive predictive value (90%) than the MRCQ (57%). Among the patients, the AQ identified 17 patients as positive (sensitivity 89%), while the MRCQ identified 15 (sensitivity 79%). respiratory questionnaire; reliability; chronic bronchitis; Nicaragua Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Int J Occup Environ Health 1077-3525 2 2 1996 April/June Chronic Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Inhibits the Stimulating Effects of Mineral Fibers on the Production of Tumor Necrosis Factor by Alveolar Macrophages of Rats 95 98 EN Yasuo Morimoto Department of Environmental Health Engineering, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan 1-1, Iseigaoka, Yahatanishiku, Kitakyushu 807, Japan. Ziro Nambu Hajime Hori Tohru Tsuda Hiroshi Yamato Toshiaki Higashi Yasuyuki Yokosaki Masamitsu Kido Isamu Tanaka The objective of this study was to evaluate the chronic combined effects of mineral fibers and cigarette smoke on the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by alveolar macrophages. The authors chronically exposed ten rats to cigarette smoke in vivo and measured the production of TNF by alveolar macrophages in the presence of mineral fibers in vitro. For smoke exposure, rats were divided into two groups. Five rats were exposed daily to a concentration of 10 mg/m(3) of cigarette smoke for six hours a day, five days a week, for four weeks, and five rats (control) were not exposed to smoke. A broncho-alveolar lavage was performed after the smoke exposure, and the recovered alveolar macrophages were incubated with either chrysotile or ceramic fibers on a microplate for 24 hours. TNF activity in the supernatant was determined by the L929 bioassay. When alveolar macrophages were not stimulated by mineral fibers, TNF production tended to be lower in smoke-exposed alveolar macrophages than in unexposed ones, although the difference was not significant statistically. When alveolar macrophages were stimulated in vitro by chrysotile or ceramic fibers, both fibers stimulated TNF production, but TNF production in smoke-exposed alveolar macrophages was lower than that in unexposed macrophages. These results revealed that long-term exposure to cigarette smoke inhibited the stimulating effect of mineral fibers on the production of TNF.

Journal Article↗

Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To adapt the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS: The DASH questionnaire was adapted through the process of translation, back-translation, and expert review. Eighty two subjects with upper extremity disorders were recruited in a medical center and 46 of these patients could be followed up to assess retest reliability in less than 10 days. Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Principal axis factor analysis was performed to assess the factor-construct validity, while concurrent validity was tested with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) Taiwan version questionnaire. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the Taiwan version of the DASH questionnaire was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.96) and the test-retest reliability was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9). Principal axis factor analysis confirmed the 1-factor model. The Pearson correlation coefficients of the DASH questionnaire to the SF-36 showed a correlation with physical component summary scores rather than mental component summary scores. Bodily pain, physical function and role-physical scores among the SF-36 subscales were most significantly correlated with DASH disability/symptom scores. CONCLUSION: The Taiwan version of the DASH questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of health status for patients with upper-extremity disorders.

Adolescent↗

[The use of herbal medicines, food supplements, and OTCs - design and testing of a questionnaire.].

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies show that open-ended questionnaire items are unreliable measures of the use of drugs and related substances. It is also important to avoid questions regarding the distant past. These issues were kept in mind when designing a questionnaire on the use of herbal medicines, food supplements, and over-the-counter drugs (OTCs). The objectives of this study were to pre-test the questionnaire and measure the prevalence of use in the last two weeks. METHODS: A questionnaire was constructed almost entirely with closed-ended responses. A pre-test was carried out in two phases. Respondents were patrons of the Icelandic Heart Association's clinic. In the utilization study a sample was taken from all 18 079 participants of the MONICA Reykjavík research study and the Descendant Study of the Icelandic Heart Association. The random sample was stratified according to age and sex (N=350). A chi-squared test was used to compare rates. RESULTS: The questionnaire was changed little after pre-testing. The main changes related to wording of questions. In the utilization study, 220 individuals responded (62.9%). The prevalence of herbal use was 46.8%, 75.9% for vitamins, minerals, and micronutrients, and 69.5% for OTCs. Garlic was the most commonly used herbal and food-supplement (14.5%). Codliver oil held a superior position in the group of vitamins, minerals, and micronutrients (59.1%). Vitamin C was the most used single vitamin (20,9%). Calcium was by far the most used mineral (11,4%). Pain relievers were the most common OTCs (38.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The format of the questionnaire was satisfactory. The prevalence of use of all groups of substances was high compared to foreign studies. Response bias may make the use seem higher than is true. As the sample was very small, this study should be viewed as a test of a specific method for measuring the use of these substances.

English Abstract↗

[Validation of ECRHS Questionnaire in Japanese to use for nation-wide prevalence study of adult asthma].

PURPOSE: To enable international comparison of prevalence in asthma, we translated and evaluated ECRHS Questionnaire, which is introduced in GINA. Considering COPD prevalence in elder people, we added two questions to the ECRHS Questionnaire. METHOD: The Japanese edition of ECRHS Questionnaire was responded by 366 patients who were diagnosed asthma without COPD, 61 patients who were diagnosed COPD without asthma, and 137 healthy persons who were not diagnosed asthma or COPD. We analyzed the answers of the each group and evaluated the validity of the questionnaire to use for the nation-wide prevalence study of adult asthma in future. RESULTS: The question of 'Wheezing at any time in the last 12 months' had the highest Youden's index and validity to pick up asthma patients. The questions of 'Waking up with a feeling of tightness in chest at any time in the last 12 months' and 'Waking up by an attack of shortness of breath at any time in the last 12 month' had the highest specificity to pick up asthma patients. Most of the questions which were related asthma were able to be answered by asthma patients properly, but some questions were improperly answered by patients and healthy persons in elderly. The results in this study showed the less recognition of their diseases in elderly patients than younger patients and the limitation of the study with written questionnaire for elderly people. Not a few COPD patients complained wheezing or whistling in the chests as same as asthma patients in this study. CONCLUSION: We concluded that we had almost enough reliability in the Japanese edition of the ECRHS questionnaire for screening survey of asthma prevalence in Japan.

Adult↗