Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Notch”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources

Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling.

In many developing tissues, adjacent cells diverge in character so as to create a fine-grained pattern of cells in contrasting states of differentiation. It has been proposed that such patterns can be generated through lateral inhibition--a type of cell-cell interaction whereby a cell that adopts a particular fate inhibits its immediate neighbors from doing likewise. Lateral inhibition is well documented in flies, worms and vertebrates. In all of these organisms, the transmembrane proteins Notch and Delta (or their homologues) have been identified as mediators of the interaction--Notch as receptor, Delta as its ligand on adjacent cells. However, it is not clear under precisely what conditions the Delta-Notch mechanism of lateral inhibition can generate the observed types of pattern, or indeed whether this mechanism is capable of generating such patterns by itself. Here we construct and analyse a simple and general mathematical model of such contact-mediated lateral inhibition. In accordance with experimental data, the model postulates that receipt of inhibition (i.e. activation of Notch) diminished the ability to deliver inhibition (i.e. to produce active Delta). This gives rise to a feedback loop that can amplify differences between adjacent cells. We investigate the pattern-forming potential and temporal behaviour of this model both analytically and through numerical simulation. Inhomogeneities are self-amplifying and develop without need of any other machinery, provided the feedback is sufficiently strong. For a wide range of initial and boundary conditions, the model generates fine-grained patterns similar to those observed in living systems.

Animals↗

A phylogenetic analysis of vertebrate and invertebrate Notch-related genes.

Members of the Notch gene family are thought to mediate inductive cell-cell interactions during development of a wide variety of vertebrates and invertebrates. These genes encoded transmembrane proteins that appear to act as receptors and contain three repeated sequence motifs. Two of these motifs (an epidermal growth factor-like sequence and a cdc10/SWI6/ankyrin sequence) have been found in a large number of unrelated proteins, while the third motif (a lin-12/Notch/glp-1 sequence) is unique to proteins of the Notch family. We present a phylogenetic analysis of 17 Notch-related genes from eight species that has implications as to the origins and relative functions of these genes in different species. Several independent gene duplications have occurred and at least one such duplication in the vertebrate lineage preceded the avian/mammalian divergence. Significantly, the overall organization of individual members of each internally repeated motif appears to have been conserved among species, suggesting that each repeat plays a unique role in protein function. Yet, where sequence divergence does occur among genes in vertebrate, dipteran, and nematode lineages, it may signify functional differences for specific regions in Notch-related proteins.

Animals↗

EBNA2 and Notch signalling in Epstein-Barr virus mediated immortalization of B lymphocytes.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has the ability to immortalize B cells. A viral key protein for immortalization is the transactivator EBNA2 that controls expression of several viral and cellular genes. EBNA2 is tethered to promoters by interacting with the cellular repressor RBP-J. This resembles the physiological activation of RBP-J-repressed promoters by activated Notch receptors (Notch-IC). Since EBNA2 and Notch-IC have been shown to be partially interchangeable in regard to activation of target genes in B cell lines and modulation of differentiation processes it is conceivable that EBNA2 is a biological equivalent of an activated Notch receptor.

B-Lymphocytes↗

kuzbanian is required cell autonomously during Notch signalling in the Drosophila wing.

The kuzbanian gene encodes a metalloprotease of the ADAM family that is involved in Notch signalling. However, its precise role is a matter of controversy. While original reports concluded that kuz is required on the receiving side of the Notch signalling pathway, a more recent report suggests that Kuz is required on the signal-emitting side for the generation of an active secreted form of the ligand Delta. In this scenario, kuz should act cell non-autonomously. A third possibility is that Kuz is required on the signal-emitting as well as the receiving side. Here I present the clonal analysis of kuz in Drosophila wing. The results show that Kuz acts on the receiving side of the pathway and is not required for Delta signalling. This further confirms the hypothesis that Kuz is required for the release of the intracellular domain of Notch that transduces the signal to the nucleus. The presented results complement recent data that indicate that Kuz can perform the S2 proteolytic cleavage of the Notch receptor that is required for its activation.

Animals↗

Notch signaling is involved in nervous system formation in ascidian embryos.

Notch signaling plays crucial roles during embryogenesis in various metazoans. HrNotch, a Notch homologue in the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi, has been previously cloned, and its expression pattern suggests that HrNotch signaling is involved in nervous system formation. To determine the function of HrNotch signaling, in the present study we examined the effects of the constitutively activated forms of HrNotch. Overexpression resulted in larvae with defects in neural tube closure and brain vesicle formation. In embryos expressing the activated HrNotch, the expression of a neural marker gene, HrETR-1, was enhanced and expanded in the central nervous system, although ectopic expression decreased during the tailbud stage. The activated HrNotch also suppressed the formation of the adhesive organ (palps) and the peripheral nervous system, which consists of ciliary mechanosensory neurons, whereas it promoted epidermal differentiation. The suppression and promotion of the formation of these respective cell types were confirmed by examination of the expression of relevant tissue-specific markers. We also cloned Hrdelta, an ascidian homologue of DSL family genes, which encode ligands for which Notch acts as a receptor. The expression of Hrdelta was observed in the precursors of palps and peripheral neurons in addition to the CNS. These results suggest that Notch signaling is important for ascidian nervous system formation and that it affects the fate choice between palps and epidermis and between peripheral neurons and epidermis within the neurogenic regions of the surface ectoderm by suppressing the formations of palps and peripheral neurons and promoting epidermal differentiation.

Animals↗

Snail is required for Delta endocytosis and Notch-dependent activation of single-minded expression.

In the Drosophila embryo, the mesectoderm corresponds to a single row of cells abutting the mesoderm. It is specified by the expression of the single-minded (sim) gene. The information that precisely positions the sim-expressing cells along the dorso-ventral axis is incompletely understood. Previous studies have shown that Dorsal and Twist activate sim expression in a large ventral domain, while two negative regulators, Snail (Sna) and Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], repress sim expression in the mesoderm and neuroectoderm, respectively. Repression by Su(H) is relieved in the presumptive mesectoderm by Notch signaling. In this paper, we show that Sna also has a positive regulatory function on sim expression in the presumptive mesectoderm. This positive effect of Sna depends on the Su(H)-binding sites within the sim promoter, suggesting that Sna regulates Notch signaling. In addition, we find that Delta is endocytosed together with the extracellular domain of Notch. The endocytosis of Delta is only seen in the mesoderm and requires the activity of the sna and neuralized (neur) genes. Interestingly, the Neur-mediated endocytosis of Delta has recently been shown to be sufficient for the non-autonomous activation of Notch target genes in wing imaginal discs. We therefore propose a novel model in which Sna positions the mesectoderm via its dual regulatory activity. In this model, Sna cell-autonomously represses sim expression in the mesoderm and relieves Su(H)-dependent repression in a cell non-autonomous fashion by promoting the Neur-dependent endocytosis of Delta in the mesoderm.

Animals↗

A dual function of the Notch gene in Drosophila sensillum development.

We have investigated the function of the neurogenic gene Notch (N) during development of the adult sensilla of Drosophila. Heat pulses were applied to flies carrying the temperature-sensitive Notch allele Nts1 at different larval and pupal stages. We can show that the reduction of Notch+ function during a short interval prior to the onset of sensillum precursor division, resulting from a heat pulse between 0 and 14 hr after puparium formation (apf), leads to an increase in microchaete precursors at the expense of epidermal cells. The structure and cellular composition of the sensilla produced by these supernumerary precursors are normal. Later heat pulses which include the interval immediately after sensillum precursor division (14-20 hr apf) lead, among the progeny of the sensillum precursors, to a hyperplasia of sensory neurons, at the expense of accessory cells. The resulting "sensilla" consist of neurons only and lack the external cuticular structures (i.e., shaft, socket). These results demonstrate that similar mechanisms both of which involve the function of the Notch gene may be operating to sort out (premitotic) sensillum precursors from epidermal precursors and (postmitotic) sensory neurons from accessory cells. They further show that in postmitotic sensillum cells the differentiative fate is not yet irreversibly fixed, but presumably requires cell-cell interaction to become established.

Alleles↗

Molecular interactions between the protein products of the neurogenic loci Notch and Delta, two EGF-homologous genes in Drosophila.

Genetic analyses have raised the possibility of interactions between the gene products of the neurogenic loci Notch and Delta, each of which encodes a transmembrane protein with EGF homology. To examine the possibility of intermolecular association between the products of these two genes, we studied the effects of their expression on aggregation in Drosophila S2 cells. We find that Notch-expressing cells form mixed aggregates specifically with cells that express Delta and that this process is calcium dependent. In addition, we show that Notch and Delta can associate within the membrane of a single cell, and further, that they form detergent-soluble intermolecular complexes. Our analyses suggest that Notch and Delta proteins interact at the cell surface via their extracellular domains.

Animals↗

Role of the Notch signalling pathway in tooth morphogenesis.

Notch receptors are involved in cell fate decisions through the process of lateral inhibition or inductive signalling. Jagged2 belongs to the family of transmembrane proteins that serve as the ligands for Notch receptors. We have analysed the expression of the Jagged2 gene in developing mouse teeth. Jagged2 expression is restricted in inner enamel epithelial cells that give rise to the ameloblasts. We have also examined the role of Jagged2 in tooth development using mutant mice that lack the domain of the Jagged2 protein required for interaction with the Notch receptors (DSL domain). Homozygous mutant mice die after birth, exhibit abnormal tooth morphology and fusions between the palatal and mandibular shelves. These results demonstrate that Notch signalling plays an essential role in tooth development.

Ameloblasts↗

Notch signaling: a mediator of beta-cell de-differentiation in diabetes?

Cytokines are mediators of pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction and death in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Microarray analyses of insulin-producing cells exposed to interleukin-1beta+interferon-gamma showed decreased expression of genes related to beta-cell-differentiated functions and increased expression of members of the Notch signaling pathway. Re-expression of this developmental pathway may contribute for loss-of-function of beta-cells exposed to an autoimmune attack. In this study, we show that rat primary beta-cells exposed to cytokines up-regulate several Notch receptors and ligands, and the target gene Hes1. Transfection of insulin-producing INS-1E cells and primary rat beta-cells with a constitutively active form of the Notch receptor down-regulated Pdx1 and insulin expression in INS-1E cells but not in primary beta-cells. Thus, activation of the Notch pathway inhibits differentiated functions in dividing but not in terminally differentiated beta-cells.

Animals↗

Hrt and Hes negatively regulate Notch signaling through interactions with RBP-Jkappa.

Notch signaling is central to cell differentiation, organ development, and apoptosis. Upon ligand binding, the Notch intracellular domain (NotchIC) translocates to the nucleus to interact with its DNA-binding partner, RBP-Jkappa. The NotchIC-RBP-Jkappa complex activates target genes, such as those encoding the Hrt and Hes families of basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional repressors. Hrt transcripts are enriched in the developing cardiovascular system, and mice lacking Hrt2 have cardiac malformations. Here we show that Hrt2 and Hes1 interact with RBP-Jkappa to negatively regulate Notch-dependent activation of Hrt and Hes expression. The bHLH domain of Hrt2 was necessary for this interaction, and disrupting the protein complex abrogated the negative autoregulation. The interaction did not interfere with the formation or DNA-binding of the NotchIC-RBP-Jkappa complex, indicating direct inhibition by Hrt and Hes as co-repressors. These findings suggest a novel mechanism for negative feedback on Notch signaling that requires RBP-Jkappa to interact physically with Hrt and Hes.

Animals↗

Notch signaling in T- and B-cell development.

The Notch family of evolutionarily conserved proteins regulates a broad spectrum of cell-fate decisions and differentiation processes during fetal and post-natal development. The best characterized role of Notch signaling during mammalian hematopoiesis and lymphopoiesis is the essential function of the Notch1 receptor in T-cell lineage commitment. More recent studies have addressed the roles of other Notch receptors and ligands, as well as their downstream targets, revealing additional novel functions of Notch signaling in intra-thymic T-cell development, B-cell development and peripheral T-cell function.

Animals↗

Stem cells signal to the niche through the Notch pathway in the Drosophila ovary.

Stem cells are maintained and retain their capacity to continue dividing because of the influence of a niche. Although niches are important to maintain "stemness" in a wide variety of tissues, control of these niches is poorly understood. The Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs) reside in a somatic cell niche. We show that Notch activation can induce the expression of niche-cell markers even in an adult fly; overexpression of Delta in the germline, or activated Notch in the somatic cells, results in extra niche cells, up to 10-fold over the normal number. In turn, these ectopic niche cells induce ectopic GSCs. Conversely, when GCSs do not produce functional Notch ligands, Delta and Serrate, the TGF-beta pathway is not activated in the GSCs, and they differentiate and subsequently leave the niche. Importantly, clonal analysis reveals that the receiving end of the Notch pathway is required in the somatic cells. These data show that a feedback loop exists between the stem cells and niche cells. Demonstration that stem cells can contribute to niche function has far-reaching consequences for stem cell therapies and may provide insight into how cancer can spread throughout an organism via populations of cancer stem cells.

Animals↗

gamma-secretase functions through Notch signaling to maintain skin appendages but is not required for their patterning or initial morphogenesis.

The role of Notch signaling during skin development was analyzed using Msx2-Cre to create mosaic loss-of-function alleles with precise temporal and spatial resolution. We find that gamma-secretase is not involved in skin patterning or cell fate acquisition within the hair follicle. In its absence, however, inner root sheath cells fail to maintain their fates and by the end of the first growth phase, the epidermal differentiation program is activated in outer root sheath cells. This results in complete conversion of hair follicles to epidermal cysts that bears a striking resemblance to Nevus Comedonicus. Sebaceous glands also fail to form in gamma-secretase-deficient mice. Importantly, mice with compound loss of Notch genes in their skin phenocopy loss of gamma-secretase in all three lineages, demonstrating that Notch proteolysis accounts for the major signaling function of this enzyme in this organ and that both autonomous and nonautonomous Notch-dependent signals are involved.

Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases↗

Control of cell proliferation in the Drosophila eye by Notch signaling.

Cell proliferation in animals must be precisely controlled, but the signaling mechanisms that regulate the cell cycle are not well characterized. A regulated terminal mitosis, called the second mitotic wave (SMW), occurs during Drosophila eye development, providing a model for the genetic analysis of proliferation control. We report a cell cycle checkpoint at the G1-S transition that initiates the SMW, and we demonstrate that Notch signaling is required for cells to overcome this checkpoint. Notch triggers the onset of proliferation by multiple pathways, including the activation of dE2F1, a member of the E2F transcription factor family. Delta to Notch signaling derepresses the inhibition of dE2F1 by RBF, and Delta expression depends on the secreted proteins Hedgehog and Dpp. Notch is also required for the expression of Cyclin A in the SMW.

Animals↗

Multiple niches for Notch in cancer: context is everything.

Notch receptor signaling has very distinctive roles in cancers originating from different types of cells that reflect its complex functions in normal tissue development and homeostasis. For example, recent studies have shown that Notch signals are oncogenic in pre-T cells but suppress tumor development in keratinocytes. Notch signaling contributes to pre-malignant metaplastic changes that precede pancreatic carcinoma, and it is also likely to be involved in other forms of metaplasia. In addition, several viral oncoproteins and chromosomal translocations target one or more components of a Notch transcriptional activation complex.

Humans↗

The multifaceted role of Notch in cancer.

The diverse roles that Notch signals play during the development and maintenance of normal tissues are recapitulated in different forms of cancer. Depending on the tumor type, Notch can variously promote or limit tumor growth through either cell autonomous or cell non-autonomous effects on differentiation, cellular metabolism, cell cycle progression, angiogenesis, and possibly self-renewal and immune function. Of particular interest, recent findings indicate that a high fraction of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and lymphomas have activating mutations in the Notch 1 receptor, and that Notch signaling might have a role in the maintenance of normal and malignant stem cells.

Genes, Tumor Suppressor↗

The potential involvement of Notch signaling in NK cell development.

NK cells constitute an essential element of the innate immune system; however, the cellular and molecular mechanisms that guide their early development are still poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that in addition to its known crucial role in T cell development, Notch signaling can also be involved in NK cell development. Thus, upon co-culture on OP9 stroma expressing the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 (OP9-DL1), Pax5-deficient pro-B cells, which have multi-lineage potential, efficiently differentiate into T and NK cells. Upon DL-1 signaling, Pax5-deficient pro-B cells down-regulate both surface CD93 expression and transcripts for B cell-specific genes and concomitantly up-regulate T lineage gene transcripts. Subsequent transfer of DL-1-signaled Pax5-deficient pro-B cells onto OP9 stroma in the presence of IL-2 leads to their efficient differentiation into NK1.1(+), functional NK cells. Moreover, bone marrow early progenitor with lymphoid and myeloid differentiation potential (EPLM), which we have previously described as the normal in vivo-equivalent of Pax5-deficient pro-B cells, also gain the ability to differentiate into effector NK cells following transient DL1 Notch-mediated signaling. The potential involvement of Notch signaling in the generation of the NK cell repertoire in vivo is discussed.

Animals↗