Influence of the method of intracavernous injection on penile rigidity: a possible pharmacokinetic explanation.
OBJECTIVES: To study whether the method of intracavernous injection of vasodilators has an effect on the clinical outcome and to explain the mechanism of possible influence. METHODS: In an open clinical study, penile rigidity after bolus injection was compared with rigidity after slow injection in 52 self-injecting, impotent patients. In 35 volunteers, venous plasma levels of intracavernosally injected drugs were followed under different injection conditions: slow injection of undiluted drug, slow injection of diluted drug, bolus injection, use of a tourniquet, or slow injection followed by squeeze of the corpora. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients, 28 reported better penile rigidity after a bolus injection than after slow injection of vasodilators. The other 24 reported no difference in rigidity. Systemic side effects did not occur, but 4 patients reported local pain after bolus injection. In the 35 volunteers, the lowest plasma levels were observed when a tourniquet was used or when a bolus injection was performed; the quickest transfer was observed after a slow injection of a low volume of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Better rigidity was observed after bolus injection in a majority of the patients using the same dose of vasodilators. This could be due to the pharmacokinetic phenomenon of a slower drug transfer to the systemic circulatory system after a bolus than after a slow injection.