Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chromatin loop”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources

Characterization of inverted repeated sequences in Ascaris nuclear DNA.

The inverted repeated sequences of the chromatin-eliminating nematode Ascaris lumbricoides var. suum have been examined by electron microscopy and by hydroxyapatite chromatography, both in the germ-line and in the somatic DNA. 38% of the inverted repeats of the germ-line DNA analysed in the electron microscope have a single-stranded loop, in comparison to about 50% of looped structures in the somatic DNA. The loops are on average 2.3 X 10(3) base pairs (bp) long. The rest of the foldback DNA consists of simple hairpins. The average length of looped and unlooped inverted repeats is of the order of 300-400 bp in the germ-line and in the somatic DNA. The content of S1-resistant foldback duplexes isolated by hydroxyapatite chromatography amounts to 1.3% in spermatids, with an average length of 350 bp, and to 1.1% in intestinal or larval cell nuclei, with a length of about 320 bp. We estimate by two different methods that there exist approximately 12500 inverted repeats per haploid germ-line genome and approximately 8000 in the haploid somatic genome. A statistical analysis of the data indicates that the great majority of the foldback sequences are randomly distributed in the Ascaris genome, with a spacing of about (40-80) X 10(3) bp, both in the germ-line and in the somatic DNA.

Animals↗

CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species.

Insulators can block an enhancer of one gene from activating a promoter on another nearby gene. Almost all described vertebrate insulators require binding of the regulatory protein CTCF for their activity. We show that CTCF copurifies with the nucleolar protein nucleophosmin and both are present at insulator sites in vivo. Furthermore, exogenous insulator sequences are tethered to the nucleolus in a CTCF-dependent manner. These interactions, quite different from those of the gypsy insulator element in Drosophila, may generate similar loop structures, suggesting a common theme and model for enhancer-blocking insulator action.

Animals↗

The activation function-1 of hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 is an acidic activator that mediates interactions through bulky hydrophobic residues.

The hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) contains two transcription activation domains. One domain, activation function-1 (AF-1), consists of the extreme N-terminal 24 amino acids and functions as a constitutive autonomous activator of transcription. This short transactivator belongs to the class of acidic activators, and it is predicted to adopt an amphipathic alpha-helical structure. Transcriptional analysis of sequential point mutations of the negatively charged residues (Asp and Glu) revealed a stepwise decrease in activity, while mutation of all acidic residues resulted in complete loss of transcriptional activity. Mutations of aromatic and hydrophobic amino acids surrounding the negatively charged residues had a much more profound effect than mutations of acidic amino acids, since even a single mutation of these residues resulted in a dramatic decrease in transactivation, thus demonstrating the importance of hydrophobic residues in AF-1 activity. Like other acidic activators, the AF-1 of HNF-4 binds the transcription factor IIB and the TATA-binding protein directly in vitro. In addition, the cAMP-response-element-binding-protein, a transcriptional adapter involved in the transactivation of a plethora of transcription factors, interacts with the AF-1 of HNF-4 and co-operates in the process of transactivation by HNF-4. The different protein targets of AF-1 suggest that the AF-1 of HNF-4 may be involved in recruiting both general transcription factors and chromatin remodelling proteins during activation of gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The expression of antiapoptotic protein survivin is transcriptionally upregulated by DEC1 primarily through multiple sp1 binding sites in the proximal promoter.

Human differentially expressed in chondrocytes (DEC), mouse stimulated with retinoic acid and rat split and hairy related proteins constitute a structurally distinct class of the basic helix-loop-helix proteins. DEC1 is abundantly expressed in tumors and protects against apoptosis induced by serum starvation. In this study, we report that DEC1 antiapoptosis is achieved by inducing survivin, an antiapoptotic protein. In paired tumor-normal tissues, survivin and DEC1 exhibited a paralleled expression pattern. Tetracycline-induced expression of DEC1 in stable lines proportionally increased the expression of survivin. In reporter assays, DEC1 transactivated the survivin promoter but repressed the DEC2 promoter. In contrast to the repression, the activation was delayed and varied depending on serum concentrations and cycle blockers. Studies with reporter mutants located, in the survivin promoter, two Sp1 sites that supported DEC1 transactivation. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation detected the presence of DEC1 in the survivin promoter. These findings establish that the survivin gene is a transcription target of DEC1, and induction of survivin is at least in part responsible for DEC1 antiapoptosis.

Adult↗

Nuclear matrix involvement in sperm head structural organization.

In the sperm nuclei the DNA is packaged into a highly condensed form and is not organized into nucleosome and solenoid but is bound and stabilized mainly by the protamines that arrange the DNA in an almost crystalline state. As demonstrated for somatic cells, the sperm DNA has been reported to be organized in loop domains attached to the nuclear matrix structures. However, the possible role of the sperm head matrix in maintaining the loop organization in absence of a typical nucleosomal structures has not been fully elucidated. By using in situ nick translation at confocal and electron microscope level, we analyzed the organization of the DNA-protamine complex and its association with the sperm nuclear matrix. The data obtained indicate that the chromatin organization in sperm nuclei is maintained during the sperm condensation by means of interactions with the nuclear matrix at fixed sites. The fine structure of sperm nucleus and of sperm nuclear matrix, investigated on sections and replicas of freeze-fractured specimens, suggests that the lamellar array, observed by freeze-fracturing in the sperm nuclei, could depend on the inner matrix which presents a regular organization of globular structures possibly involved in the maintenance of chromatin domains in highly condensed sperm nuclei also.

Animals↗

An autoregulatory loop controlling orphan nuclear receptor DAX-1 gene expression by orphan nuclear receptor ERRgamma.

The estrogen receptor-related receptor gamma (ERRgamma/ERR3/NR3B3) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that activates transcription in the absence of ligand. However, the detailed mechanism of gene regulation by ERRgamma is not fully understood. In this study we have found that the orphan nuclear receptor ERRgamma activates the DAX-1 promoter, which, in turn, represses transactivation by ERRgamma. Serial deletions of mouse DAX-1 (mDAX-1) gene promoter have revealed that the region responding to ERRgamma is located between -129 and -121 bp and -334 and -326 bp. Gel shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated that ERRgamma binds directly to the mDAX-1 promoter. Site-directed mutagenesis results demonstrated that ERRE1 (-129 to -121 bp) is more important than ERRE2 (-334 to -326 bp) which is not conserved in the human DAX-1 promoter. In addition, adenovirus-mediated overexpression of ERRgamma induced DAX-1 gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells that co-expressed ERRgamma and DAX-1. Moreover, yeast two-hybrid and glutathione S-transferase (GST)-pull down assays demonstrated that DAX-1 physically interacted with ERRgamma and inhibited ERRgamma transactivation, and that this interaction was dependent on the AF-2 domain of ERRgamma. In addition, in vitro competition assays showed that DAX-1 inhibited PGC-1alpha mediated ERRgamma transactivation, via competition between these two factors for the AF-2 binding domain. We thus propose a novel autoregulatory loop that controls DAX-1 gene expression by ERRgamma.

Animals↗

DN-p73 is activated after DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner to regulate p53-induced cell cycle arrest.

p53 and p73 genes are both activated in response to DNA damage to induce either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis, depending on the strength and the quality of the damaging stimulus. p53/p73 transcriptional activity must be tightly regulated to ensure that the appropriate biological response is achieved and to allow the cell to re-enter into the cell cycle after the damage has been repaired. In addition to multiple transcriptionally active (TA) isoforms, dominant negative (DN) variants, that lack the amino-terminal transactivation domain and function as trans-repressors of p53, p63 and p73, are expressed from a second internal promoter (P2-p73Pr). Here we show that, in response to a non apoptotic DNA damage induced by low doses of doxorubicin, p53 binds in vivo, as detected by a p53-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, and activates the P2-p73 promoter. DN-p73alpha protein accumulates under the same conditions and exogenously expressed DN-p73alpha is able to counteract the p53-induced activation of the P2-p73Pr. These results suggest that DN-p73 may contribute to the autoregulatory loops responsible for the termination of p53/p73 responses in cells that do not undergo apoptosis. Accordingly, the activation of the P2-p73Pr is markedly enhanced in both p73-/- murine fibroblasts and in human cells in which p73 transcripts are selectively knocked-out by p73-specific small interfering RNAs.

Apoptosis↗

What is the restriction point?

The restriction point (R) separates two functionally different parts of G1 in continuously cycling cells. G1-pm represents the postmitotic interval of G1 that lasts from mitosis to R. G1-ps represents the pre S phase interval of G1 that lasts from R to S. G1-pm is remarkably constant in length (its duration is about three hours) in the different cell types studied so far. G1-ps, however, varies considerably, indicating that entry into S is not directly followed after passage through R. Progression through G1-pm requires continuous stimulation by mitogenic signals (e.g. growth factors) and a high rate of protein synthesis. Interruption of the mitogenic signals or moderate inhibition of protein synthesis leads to a rapid exit from the cell cycle to G0 in normal (untransformed) cells. Upon restimulation with mitogenic signals, the cell returns to the same point in G1-pm from which it left the cell cycle. Thus the cell seems to have a memory for how far it has advanced through G1-pm, suggesting that a continuous structural alteration, for example chromatin decondensation, takes place in G1. The molecular background to transition from growth factor dependence in G1-pm to growth factor independence in G1-ps (a switch which represents commitment to a new cell cycle and passage through R) is still not fully understood. Cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)-mediated hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), and concomitant liberation (and activation) of members of the E2F family of transcription factors, are probably important aspects of R control in normal cells. A key component here could be cdk2 activity which is controlled by cyclin E. When cdk2 activity starts to increase rapidly in G1, due to activation of a positive feedback loop, it reaches a critical level above which cdk inhibitors (CKIs) such as p21 and p27 are outweighed; the cell has then become independent of mitogenic and inhibitory signals and is committed to a new cell cycle. However, other components are probably also involved in R control. For instance, a 'cryptic' R (a G1-pm-like state) can be induced even in tumour cells that do not respond to growth factor starvation or protein synthesis inhibitors, and are therefore probably defective in the cdk-Rb-E2F pathway. Possibly, a certain degree of chromatin decondensation has to take place after mitosis in order to allow transcription of, for example, the cyclin E gene or other critical E2F targets. Although the molecular basis for restriction point control still remains unclear, we can expect rapid progress in this important field over the next few years.

Cell Cycle↗

E47 activates the Ig-heavy chain and TdT loci in non-B cells.

The E2A proteins, E12 and E47, are basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins essential for the B-cell lineage. Initially identified as immunoglobulin enhancer-binding proteins, they have also been shown to activate immunoglobulin enhancer-based reporters in transient transfection assays. Here, we examine the relationship between E2A DNA binding activity and activation of the endogenous, chromosomal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus. Using sterile I(mu) transcription as an indicator of IgH enhancer activity, we see a direct correlation between E2A DNA binding activity and I(mu) transcription in stable BxT hybrids. We also observe a 1000-fold stimulation of endogenous I(mu) transcription in fibroblasts that express high levels of E47 and less stimulation in cells that express E12. By contrast, none of the other IgH enhancer-binding proteins tested (E2-2, Pu.1, Oct-2, OCA-B, TFE3 and USF) were able to activate I(mu) transcription. E47 overexpression also resulted in transcriptional activation of the endogenous gene encoding TdT, indicating that it, too, is a target of E2A proteins early in the B-cell lineage. Our results indicate that E2A proteins have the distinctive property of activating silent, chromatin-embedded B-cell-specific genes, underscoring their crucial role in B-cell development.

3T3 Cells↗

Conformation of replicated segments of chromosome fibres in human S-phase nucleus.

Recent statistical analysis of the folding of G0/G1 chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) allowed development of a random walk/giant loop model of chromosome structure. According to this model there are two levels of organization of G0/G1 chromosome fibres. On the first level, the fibres are arranged in giant loops several Mbp in size, and within each loop the fibres are randomly folded. On the second level, the loop attachment sites form a chromosome backbone that also shows random folding. Newly replicated segments of mammalian chromosomes may be directly visualized at high resolution in S-phase nuclei using immunofluorescent methods and appear as worm-like fibres. In our earlier study, we analysed conformation of the fibres in human cells blocked for 16 h at the G1/S boundary with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU) and then released into S-phase by the addition of a DNA precursor. However, long treatment of cells with FdU induces very short replicons and may promote apoptosis. In this study we analysed conformation of the fibres in normally proliferating human cells that had not been blocked with FdU for a long time. It has been found that replicated chromosome fibres visualized just after 2 h of incubation of the cells with a non-radioactively labelled DNA precursor behave as flexible polymer chains without major constraints, and that their local conformation in the range of several microns of their contour length may be considered as random. Confocal analysis of human X chromosomes visualized in HeLa cells using FISH with a specific painting probe shows that in S-phase the chromosomes occupy distinct nuclear territories and their apparent size does not differ from that in non-S-phase cells. This observation indicates that the second level of chromosome organization also exists in S-phase chromosomes. It appears, therefore, that the random walk/giant loop model developed earlier for G0/G1 chromosomes is also valid for S-phase chromosomes.

Cell Nucleus↗

A 'loop recapture' mechanism for ACF-dependent nucleosome remodeling.

The ATPase ISWI is the molecular motor of several nucleosome remodeling complexes including ACF. We analyzed the ACF-nucleosome interactions and determined the characteristics of ACF-dependent nucleosome remodeling. In contrast to ISWI, ACF interacts symmetrically with DNA entry sites of the nucleosome. Two-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy measurements show that ACF can bind four DNA duplexes simultaneously in a complex that contains two Acf1 and ISWI molecules. Using bead-bound nucleosomal substrates, nucleosome movement by mechanisms involving DNA twisting was excluded. Furthermore, an ACF-dependent local detachment of DNA from the nucleosome was demonstrated in a novel assay based on the preferred intercalation of ethidium bromide to free DNA. The findings suggest a loop recapture mechanism in which ACF introduces a DNA loop at the nucleosomal entry site that propagates over the histone octamer surface and leads to nucleosome repositioning.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter.

Activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene by phosphate starvation is accompanied by the disappearance of two pairs of positioned nucleosomes that flank a short hypersensitive region in the promoter. The transcription factor Pho4 is the key regulator of this transition. By in vitro footprinting it was previously shown that there is a low affinity site (UASp1) which is contained in the short hypersensitive region in the inactive promoter, and a high affinity site (UASp2) which is located in the adjacent nucleosome. To investigate the interplay between nucleosomes and Pho4, we have performed in vivo footprinting experiments with dimethylsulfate. Pho4 was found to bind to both sites in the active promoter. In contrast, it binds to neither site in the repressed promoter. Lack of binding under repressing conditions is largely due to the low affinity of Pho4 for its binding sites under these conditions. Despite the increased affinity of Pho4 for its target sites under activating conditions, binding to UASp2 is prevented by the presence of the nucleosome and can only occur after prior disruption of this nucleosome in a process that requires UASp1. Protection of the PHO5 UASp2 by the nucleosome is not absolute, however, since overexpression of Pho4 can disrupt this nucleosome even when UASp1 is deleted. Also under these conditions, with only UASp2 present, all four nucleosomes at the PHO5 promoter are disrupted, whereas no chromatin change at all is observed when both UAS elements are destroyed.

Allosteric Regulation↗

Spatial and temporal recruitment of androgen receptor and its coactivators involves chromosomal looping and polymerase tracking.

Androgen receptor (AR) plays a critical role in the development and progression of prostate cancer, where it is a key therapeutic target. Here we report that, in contrast to estrogen receptor transcription complexes which form within minutes and recycle hourly, the levels of regulatory regions bound by AR complexes rise over a 16 hr period and then slowly decline. AR regulation of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) gene involves both a promoter-proximal sequence as well as an enhancer approximately 4 kb upstream. Recruitment of AR and its essential coactivators at both sites creates a chromosomal loop that allows RNA polymerase II (pol II) to track from the enhancer to the promoter. Phosphorylation of the pol II C-terminal domain is required for pol II tracking but not chromosomal looping. Development of improved hormonal therapies for prostate cancer must take in account the specific spatial and temporal modes of AR-mediated gene regulation.

Androgens↗

Lampbrush chromosomes and associated bodies: new insights into principles of nuclear structure and function.

The lampbrush chromosomes and assorted nuclear bodies of amphibian and avian oocytes provide uniquely advantageous and amenable experimental material for cell biologists to study the structure and function of the eukaryotic nucleus, and in particular to address the processes of nuclear gene expression. Recent findings discussed here include the molecular analysis of the actively elongating RNA polymerase complexes associated with lampbrush chromosome loops and of the association between loop nascent transcripts and RNA processing components. In addition, several types of chromosome structure that do not outwardly resemble simple extended loops and that may house novel nuclear functions have recently been studied in detail. Among these a type of chromosomal body that can also exist free in the oocyte nucleus, the Cajal body, has been shown to possess a range of characteristics that suggest it is involved in the assembly of macromolecular complexes required for gene expression. Homologous structures have also been described in somatic nuclei. Fundamental aspects of the looped organization exhibited by lampbrush as well as other chromosomes have also been addressed, most notably by the application of a technique for de-novo chromosome assembly.

Amphibians↗

Enhancer-promoter communication mediated by Chip during Pannier-driven proneural patterning is regulated by Osa.

The GATA factor Pannier activates proneural achaete/scute (ac/sc) expression during development of the sensory organs of Drosophila through enhancer binding. Chip bridges Pannier with the (Ac/Sc)-Daughterless heterodimers bound to the promoter and facilitates the enhancer-promoter communication required for proneural development. We show here that this communication is regulated by Osa, which is recruited by Pannier and Chip. Osa belongs to Brahma chromatin remodeling complexes and we show that Osa negatively regulates ac/sc. Consequently, Pannier and Chip also play an essential role during repression of proneural gene expression. Our study suggests that altering chromatin structure is essential for regulation of enhancer-promoter communication.

Animals↗

nimO, an Aspergillus gene related to budding yeast Dbf4, is required for DNA synthesis and mitotic checkpoint control.

The nimO predicted protein of Aspergillus nidulans is related structurally and functionally to Dbf4p, the regulatory subunit of Cdc7p kinase in budding yeast. nimOp and Dbf4p are most similar in their C-termini, which contain a PEST motif and a novel, short-looped Cys2-His2 zinc finger-like motif. DNA labelling and reciprocal shift assays using ts-lethal nimO18 mutants showed that nimO is required for initiation of DNA synthesis and for efficient progression through S phase. nimO18 mutants abrogated a cell cycle checkpoint linking S and M phases by segregating their unreplicated chromatin. This checkpoint defect did not interfere with other checkpoints monitoring spindle assembly and DNA damage (dimer lesions), but did prevent activation of a DNA replication checkpoint. The division of unreplicated chromatin was accelerated in cells lacking a component of the anaphase-promoting complex (bimEAPC1), consistent with the involvement of nimO and APC/C in separate checkpoint pathways. A nimO deletion conferred DNA synthesis and checkpoint defects similar to nimO18. Inducible nimO alleles lacking as many as 244 C-terminal amino acids supported hyphal growth, but not asexual development, when overexpressed in a ts-lethal nimO18 strain. However, the truncated alleles could not rescue a nimO deletion, indicating that the C terminus is essential and suggesting some type of interaction among nimO polypeptides.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Neuronatin, a downstream target of BETA2/NeuroD1 in the pancreas, is involved in glucose-mediated insulin secretion.

BETA2 (NeuroD1) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. BETA2 plays an important role in the development of the pancreas and the nervous system. Using microarray technology, we identified neuronatin (Nnat) as differentially expressed between wild-type (WT) and knockout (KO) pancreatic RNA from embryonic day 14 (e14.5). NNAT is a member of the proteolipid family of amphipathic polypeptides and is believed to be involved in ion channel transport or channel modulation. Northern blot and in situ hybridization analysis of WT and KO samples confirmed the downregulation of Nnat in pancreas of mutant BETA2 embryos. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and gel shift assays were performed and demonstrated the presence of BETA2 on the Nnat promoter, thus confirming the direct transcriptional regulation of Nnat by BETA2. To assess NNAT potential function, we performed knockdown studies by siRNA in NIT cells and observed a reduction in the ability of the NIT cells to respond to glucose. These results suggest for the first time an important role for NNAT in insulin secretion and for proper beta-cell function.

Animals↗