Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Choledocholithiasis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Comorbid occurrence of cholelithiasis and gastrointestinal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether gallstone disease represents a general risk factor for gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The comorbid occurrences of cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis with cancers of the biliary tract, pancreas, small and large intestine were analysed in a population of 3.41 million military veterans who were discharged from VA hospitals distributed throughout the USA between 1981 and 1993. Comorbidity was calculated as the ratio between the observed and expected number of hospitalized veterans with cholelithiasis plus cancer. A 95% confidence interval was calculated based on the Poisson distribution of the observed number of patients with comorbidity. RESULTS: In cholelithiasis, the ratio of comorbid occurrence with biliary cancer was 4.59 (4.06-5.31). In choledocholithiasis, the ratio of comorbid occurrence with biliary cancer was 9.31 (7.20-11.84) and with pancreatic cancer 4.34 (3.80-4.94). These ratios remained significant when the analyses were confined to cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis documented before the first diagnosis of cancer. The ratios of the comorbid occurrences between cholelithiasis and cancers of the small or large intestine were only significant when total comorbid occurrences were analysed, but vanished in the analysis restricted to cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis documented before the first diagnosis of cancer. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of gallstones represents a risk factor for pancreaticobiliary cancer, but not cancers involving other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. This association appears particularly strong in patients with choledocholithiasis.

Cholelithiasis↗
PubMed1984

Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater: an analysis of 300 cases.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed on 300 patients with biliary and/or pancreatic disease during the period 1978-1983. The most frequent indications were choledocholithiasis after cholecystectomy (59%), choledocholithiasis without cholecystectomy (17%) and presumed motility disorders of the sphincter of Oddi (15%). In choledocholithiasis, stones passed spontaneously or were extracted from the bile duct in 147 of 164 patients (90%) in whom the outcome was determined by cholangiography immediately after stone extraction or by a second retrograde cholangiogram. In presumed motility disorders, only 51% of patients have shown sustained improvement in symptoms. Complications were uncommon (5%) but included bleeding from the margins of the incision, pancreatitis, cholangitis and an entrapped Dormia basket; no patient died. Duodenal diverticula were more frequent (p less than 0.005) in patients with bile duct stones after cholecystectomy (28%) than in patients in whom retrograde cholangiography did not reveal stones (9%) but the presence of diverticula did not influence the outcome of the procedure. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a safe and effective procedure of particular relevance to elderly patients with choledocholithiasis after cholecystectomy and to high-risk patients with choledocholithiasis without cholecystectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Preoperative screening with ultrasonography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an alternative to routine intraoperative cholangiography.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis is not routinely successful. A prospective study was undertaken to determine if preoperative screening with ultrasonography and liver function tests (LFTs) could minimize the incidence of unsuspected choledocholithiasis. METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients were studied. Patients with a common bile duct greater than 6 mm and either clinical symptoms or elevated LFT results were referred for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS: Ten patients (8%) were referred for preoperative ERCP, of whom seven had choledocholithiasis, two had papillary stenosis, and one had a normal examination (90% positive ERCPs). One hundred eight patients underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nine patients underwent postoperative ERCP dictated by increasing common bile duct size, elevated enzyme levels, or symptoms. Four patients (3%) had choledocholithiasis that was successfully treated endoscopically. One patient had papillary stenosis, one had oriental cholangitis, and three had normal results on examination. CONCLUSIONS: In this study ultrasonography and LFTs identified patients at high risk for choledocholithiasis, allowing preoperative referral for endoscopic stone extraction.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A prospective experience with selective cholangiography.

A prospective study of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of identifying clinically significant choledocholithiasis with selective cholangiography. Between 1991 and 1995, 262 patients presented to the senior author (K.W.M.) with acute or chronic cholecystitis. Sixteen patients had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for an elevated alkaline phosphatase or total bilirubin greater than twice the normal value or an ultrasound finding suspecting choledocholithiasis. Ten of the ERCP patients had choledocholithiasis, with eight patients having successful clearance by ERCP. Ninety other patients had intraoperative cholangiography for abnormal serum liver biochemistries, a history of jaundice or pancreatitis, or a dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>6 mm) on ultrasound. Fourteen of the intraoperative cholangiography patients and the two remaining ERCP patients had choledocholithiasis requiring CBD exploration for clearance of their stones. There were no false-positive cholangiograms, and there were no bile duct injuries in this series. With 100 per cent follow-up of at least 2 years, only one patient required ERCP clearance of a retained CBD stone 13 months after cholecystectomy. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value for the selective cholangiography criteria are 23 per cent and 99 per cent, respectively. In conclusion, clinically significant choledocholithiasis can be found effectively with selective cholangiography. Also, utilizing selective cholangiography reduces the number of routine cholangiograms by 60 per cent.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Indications for selective intraoperative cholangiography.

The indications for selective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) include a clinical history of jaundice, pancreatitis, elevated bilirubin level, abnormal liver function test results, increased amylase levels, a high lipase level, or dilated common bile duct on preoperative ultrasonography. Although these clinical features are widely accepted as indications for IOC, they have not been tested for their ability to predict choledocholithiasis. Charts were reviewed for a 6-month time period in 2003 at Parkland Memorial Hospital for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to determine which factors predicted choledocholithiasis. Of the 572 patients undergoing cholecystectomies during the study period, 189 underwent IOC and common bile duct stones were found in 57. Only preoperative hyperbilirubinemia or ultrasonograph identification of common bile duct dilation reliably predicted choledocholithiasis. There were 13 cases of choledocholithiasis that would not have been identified by preoperative hyperbilirubinemia or an enlarged common bile duct. However, common bile duct stones were clinically significant in only 2 of the 13 cases. One of these was treated with postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and the other was treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Preoperative identification of a dilated common bile duct or elevated bilirubin levels can be the sole criteria for performing IOC on a selective basis in patients without malignancy. Reliance on a history of remote jaundice, pancreatitis, elevated liver function test values, or pancreatic enzymes results in unnecessary IOCs.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Acute cholangitis: imaging diagnosis and management].

Cholangitis is an infection of the biliary ductal system that results from biliary obstruction. Choledocholithiasis has been the leading cause of acute cholangitis. Acute cholangitis remains a life-threatening complication of biliary obstruction that needs emergency diagnosis and treatment. Ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality for assessment of patients with suspected acute cholangitis. US is both sensitive and specific in demonstrating biliary dilatation. However, biliary dilatation is not always present at the early stage of bile duct obstruction and the performance of US in demonstrating choledocholithiasis is poor. Computed tomography (CT) without contrast injection is more sensitive than US in demonstrating choledocholithiasis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic sonography (EUS) are the most sensitive techniques to correctly determine the underlying cause and level of biliary obstruction in patients with acute cholangitis. In patients without previous cholecystectomy, clinical, biological, and US results allow to determine patients with high probability of having choledocholithiasis even if the stone is not directly visible on US. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy require laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, especially if the common bile duct clearance is not checked before surgery by MRCP or EUS.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Role of ERCP in the management of predicted mild acute biliary pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis is controversial. This study examined the results of ERCP in patients with predicted mild disease and analysed biochemical and imaging findings in relation to the occurrence of choledocholithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 172 consecutive patients, admitted between January 1998 and December 2000, with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. All patients were investigated using transcutaneous ultrasonography and ERCP if biliary aetiology was suspected. Serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase were measured, together with abdominal ultrasonographic findings, as potential predictors for choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: Biliary calculus was the aetiology in 62.8% of patients (108/172). Among these 108 patients, 79.6% (86/108) suffered from mild disease. There were only 80 patients who underwent ERCP, and the incidence of choledocholithiasis was 45% (36/80). Although significant correlation was shown between all three measured parameters (bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and ultrasonographic abnormalities) and choledocholithiasis, their individual sensitivities, specificities and predictive values were low. Nonetheless, if all three tests were normal, the incidence of ductal stones was significantly lower than that in cases with abnormalities in any one of these parameters (4.8% vs 59.3%). CONCLUSION: Routine ERCP is not recommended for patients with mild, acute biliary pancreatitis when there is no biochemical derangement or ultrasonographic evidence of a dilated biliary system.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Prospective audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience at a secondary referral centre in South australia.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the gold standard procedure for symptomatic gallstone disease. Nevertheless, there are still several controversies such as the need for routine intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), the indications for and results of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the setting of acute cholecystitis and the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration for intraoperatively detected choledocholithiasis. The aim of this study was to investigate some of these controversies. METHODS: All laparoscopic cholecystectomies carried out at our institution, a secondary referral centre in Adelaide, South Australia, over a 9-month period were prospectively audited. Data were collected regarding indications for surgery, rate of conversion to open operation, use of IOC, rate of choledocholithiasis and complication rate. RESULTS: There were 202 patients, of whom 152 were women and 50 men. Age range was 15-83 years. Sixty-one per cent of emergency operations were for acute cholecystitis. The conversion rate for emergency operations was 20.6% and for elective procedures was 4.2% (P = 0.003). One hundred and eighty-four patients had an IOC performed. Twelve of these patients had choledocholithiasis. Six of these 12 patients had both normal preoperative ultrasound and liver function tests. Four of the patients went on to postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, four had successful laparoscopic CBD exploration, two had open CBD exploration and two had their distal CBD filling defects flushed away with normal saline. There was no morbidity associated with performance of the IOC. There were three patients with postoperative bile leak and one with a bile duct injury. CONCLUSION: Selective IOC would miss a proportion of patients with choledocholithiasis. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is associated with a higher conversion rate than elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall complication rate is low, with 95% of patients having no complications. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is feasible with a reasonable success rate. This can all be achieved at a secondary referral centre staffed by general surgeons.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholangiopancreatic diseases.

AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and stenosing papillitis. METHODS: A total of 1 026 patients undergoing EST during July 1983 to May 2003 at the institute were retrospectively analyzed. Chronic pancreatitis was diagnosed in 63 (6.1%), cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in 549 (53.5%), stones in residual biliary duct in 249 (24.3%), stenosing papillitis in 228 (22.2%). In patients with simple stenosing papillitis, most incisions were within 0.5-1 cm in length. As for patients with chronic pancreatitis simultaneously, selective pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed, and incision was within 0.5-0.8 cm in length. For stones less than 1 cm, incision was from 1 to 1.5 cm, and for those larger than 1 cm, incision ranged from 1.5 to 3 cm. For stones more than 2 cm in diameter, detritus basket rather than simple incision was chosen. RESULTS: Of the 798 patients with choledocholithiasis, 764 (93.5%) had successful stone clearance, 215 (94.3%) out of 228 cases of stenosing papillitis were cured totally, while 63 had chronic pancreatitis developed from stenosing papillitis, 57 (90.1%) had sound remission of symptoms, though membranous stenosis emerged in 13 of 57 which was treated with balloon dilatation. After the operation, only 21 cases (2.1%) had complications such as severe pancreatitis and incision bleeding. None of the patients died. CONCLUSION: EST is an ideal surgical management with mini-invasion in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and stenosing papillitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Antegrade papillosphincterotomy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Stenotic lesions of the distal part of the common bile duct are often revealed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From 1997 intraoperative antegrade papillosphincterotomy (APST) has been introduced in clinical practice of the endoscopic department of the A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery as the method able both to treat choledocholithiasis and restore adequate bile outflow. Indications to APST were stenosis of Vater's papilla (13 patients), stricture of a terminal part of the common bile duct (6 patients), choledocholithiasis in combination with distal bile duct stenosis (20 patients), isolated choledocholithiasis (4 patients). APST was successful in 36 patients and in 35 ones it was a final procedure for correction of ducts lesions. There were no complications of APST. It is an effective method in the treatment of intraoperatively defected stenotic lesions of the biliary tracts and choledocholithiasis. It makes the base of one-stage surgical policy in line with cholangioscope-assisted lithoextraction, intraoperative retrograde papillosphincterotomy and balloon dilatation of Vater's papilla. Antegrade papilloshincterotomy in patients with cholelithiasis and lesions of the ducts revealed during surgery permits one to reduce number of complications, time of hospital stay and increase comfort of surgical care.

Ampulla of Vater↗
PubMed2004

Oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography--an initial experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience of CT (Computed tomographic) Cholangiography examination for detection of choledocholithiasis at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) Karachi Pakistan. METHODS: Seven patients underwent helical CT cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis. Iopanoic acid (6 grams) was administered orally 8-12 hours before acquisition of a helical CT cholangiogram. Three-dimensional reconstructions and curved multiplanar reformations were generated from a set of axial source images. RESULTS: Our patients had no adverse reactions to iopanoic acid. The degree of biliary opacification was sufficient to perform three-dimensional and curved planar reformations in 5 patients. In two patients, the biliary tree was not opacified. Both of these studies were considered failures. Findings on CT cholangiography in the remaining 5 patients were the following: cholelithiasis with normal bile duct (n=2), choledocholithiasis (n=1), stone in gallbladder remnant with long cystic duct (n=1) and infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder (n=1). CONCLUSION: Spiral CT cholangiography is a safe, non-invasive, and cost effective alternative test and, in a carefully selected patient population can play a role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Construction of an ultrasound clinical scale for the diagnosis of choledocolithiasis].

OBJECTIVE: to describe the construction of a clinical ultrasonographic scale for diagnosing choledocholithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of diagnostic tests, done through files of patients older than 18 years old with diagnosis related to having jaundice, who received care at three hospital facilities in Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico from 1998 to 1999, was carried out. Clinical, lab and cabinet data were collected. Gold standards were considered endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography as well as exploratory laparotomy. A diagnostic scale for choledocholithiasis was constructed through logistic regression and multivariate analysis using principal components. Sensitivity, specificity, prediction values, negative and positive likelihood ratio (LR) and ROC curves were estimated. The threshold model was applied for medical decision making. RESULTS: For detecting choledocholithiasis the scale's sensitivity was 98%, specificity was 95%, positive and negative predictive values were 95% and 97%, respectively. The estimated positive LR was 19.6 and negative 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients up to 70 years with acute jaundice evolution, the scale can diagnose securely choledocholithiasis. The pretest prevalence and/ or probability do not affect importantly its accuracy for medical decision making.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.

The aim of this study was to compare prospectively a breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) technique with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Seventy-six patients with suspected strictures or choledocholithiasis were referred for MRCP and subsequent ERCP examination, which were performed within 4 h of each other. The MRCP technique was performed using fat-suppressed rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) projection images obtained in standardised planes with additional targeted projections as required by the supervising radiologist. Two radiologists (in consensus) assessed the MRCP results prospectively and independently for the presence of bile duct calculi, strictures, non-specific biliary dilatation and pancreatic duct dilatation, and recorded a single primary diagnosis. The ERCP was assessed prospectively and independently by a single endoscopist and used as a gold standard for comparison with MRCP. Diagnostic agreement was assessed by the Kappa statistic. The MRCP technique failed in two patients and ERCP in five. In the remaining 69 referrals ERCP demonstrated normal findings in 23 cases, strictures in 19 cases, choledocholithiasis in 9 cases, non-specific biliary dilatation in 14 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 4 cases. The MRCP technique correctly demonstrated 22 of 23 normal cases, 19 strictures with one false positive (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 98 %), all 9 cases of choledocholithiasis with two false positives (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 97 %), 12 of 14 cases of non-specific biliary dilatation and only 1 of 4 cases of chronic pancreatitis. There was overall good agreement for diagnosis based on a kappa value of 0.88. Breath-hold projection MRCP can provide non-invasively comparable diagnostic information to diagnostic ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis and biliary strictures and may allow more selective use of therapeutic ERCP.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Abnormal cholangiograms during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Is treatment always necessary?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is more expensive and time consuming than its conventional counterpart. Therefore, it should only be performed when there is near certainty that stones are present. The purpose of this study was to identify patients who should be spared LCBDE despite an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram. METHODS: Of 700 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between 1989 and 1994 by a single surgeon (R.J.F.), 41 had abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms (6%). All 41 patients were treated by either immediate CBDE (19) (conventional or laparoscopic) or had postoperative follow-up cholangiograms (22). The patients were retrospectively assigned to one of three groups. Group I patients had a single "soft" indicator of choledocholithiasis. Group II patients had one or more of the following: (1) a highly suspicious abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram, (2) two or more "soft" indicators of choledocholithiasis, or (3) preoperative clinical findings such as elevated liver function studies or positive preoperative radiological studies. Group III patients had proven choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: In group I, there were 11 patients, none of whom underwent immediate CBDE. Eight of the 11 (73%) had normal follow-up cholangiograms due to either spontaneous stone passage or a false-positive intraoperative cholangiogram. There were 27 patients in group II; 19 underwent immediate CBDE with 100% stone recovery. The remaining 8 had delayed treatment and in five stones were recovered, while three had normal postoperative cholangiograms suggesting spontaneous stone passage. In group III, all three had negative follow-up cholangiograms despite proven choledocholithiasis. Spontaneous stone passage in this group seemed highly likely. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of a single soft indicator results in a low rate of stone recovery postoperatively, and these patients should not undergo LCBDE. In this series, spontaneous stone passage seemed highly likely in at least 3/22 (14%) and possibly as high as 14/22 (64%).

Catheterization↗
PubMed1996

Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Nonsurgical alternatives in biliary diseases have not been studied in large series of patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to determine the indications and results of endoscopic treatment in this subset of patients. METHODS: Fifty-two patients (36 men, 16 women-Child-Pugh Class A, 18; B, 22; C, 12) aged 63 +/- 18 years underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) between 1988 and 1993. Antibiotic prophylaxis was routinely carried out and coagulopathy was corrected before ES when required. The data were collected retrospectively up to 30 days after ES. RESULTS: ES succeeded in 98% of the patients (12 cases of needle-knife papillotomy). Twenty-nine patients (55.7%) had choledocholithiasis, 18 had biliary strictures (12 malignant), and 5 had pancreatic or other biliary diseases. Five days after ES, morbidity was 13.5% and mortality was 7.7%. At 1 month, morbidity was 22.9% and mortality 12.5%. Only endoscopic procedures and Ineffective drainage were seen to be significant risk factors or morbidity. The results of the subgroup of cirrhotic patients with choledocholithiasis (n = 29) were compared with those of matched noncirrhotic patients (n = 58). The cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients treated for choledocholithiasis showed similar results for stone clearance, morbidity, and mortality. CONCLUSION: ES is a safe and effective procedure for treating choledocholithiasis in cirrhotic patients. ES can therefore be considered as an alternative to surgery in Child class A and B patients and must be preferred for Child class C patients with life-threatening biliary complications.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: No procedure has yet been identified as the standard for the detection and management of choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A prospective study involved 1305 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intravenous cholangiography was performed on all patients except those with jaundice or cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, or allergy to contrast material. Patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and endoscopic sphincterotomy when there was a strong suspicion of choledocholithiasis, positive or inconclusive findings on intravenous cholangiography or allergy to contrast material with signs of possible choledocholithiasis. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed when patients did not undergo ERC or intravenous cholangiography and whenever the surgeon was in doubt about biliary anatomy or biliary clearance. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-one patients (17.7%) were referred for preoperative ERC; 14 of them were referred for open surgery because of failure of ERC or sphincterotomy. Only 54 patients underwent intraoperative cholangiography. Bile duct stones, detected in 186 cases (14.2%) (68 of which were asymptomatic), were removed before surgery in 162 cases (87.1%) and during surgery in 20 (10.7%). Self-limited pancreatitis occurred in 3.6% of the patients after sphincterotomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 98.7% of the cases. The conversion rate was 8% if sphincterotomy had been performed previously, and 3% after standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p < 0.001). The morbidity rate was 5% and the mortality rate 0.08%. During the follow-up period 4 patients had retained stones that were treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ERC followed by laparoscopy is the best approach to treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and suspected choledocholithiasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Prospective assessment of the utility of EUS in the evaluation of gallstone pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The ability to identify common bile duct stones by noninvasive means in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis is limited. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the ability of endosonography (EUS) to identify cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis and predict disease severity in patients with nonalcoholic pancreatitis. METHODS: EUS was performed immediately before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by separate blinded examiners within 72 hours of admission. Gallbladder findings were compared between EUS and transabdominal ultrasonography (US). Using endoscopic extraction of a bile duct stone as the reference standard for choledocholithiasis, the diagnostic yield of EUS was compared with transabdominal US and ERCP. Features identified during endosonographic imaging of the pancreas were correlated with length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were studied. EUS and transabdominal US were concordant in their interpretation of gallbladder findings in 92% of patients. The sensitivity of transabdominal US, EUS, and ERCP for identifying choledocholithiasis was 50%, 91%, and 92% and the accuracy was 83%, 97%, and 89%, respectively. Length of hospital stay was longer in patients with peripancreatic fluid (9.2 vs. 5.7 days, p < 0.1) and shorter in patients with coarse echo texture (2.6 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.05) demonstrated on EUS. CONCLUSIONS: EUS can reliably identify cholelithiasis and is more sensitive than transabdominal US in detecting choledocholithiasis in patients with biliary pancreatitis. EUS may be used early in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis to select those who would benefit from endoscopic stone extraction. The utility of EUS for predicting pancreatitis severity requires further investigation.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct stenting in the management of common bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with common bile duct stones associated with stones in the gall bladder remains controversial. METHODS: Over the three-year period from 1996 to 1999, patients with cholelithiasis and known choledocholithiasis, or choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were initially treated by placing a stent across the sphincter of Oddi. The stent was pushed along a guide wire through the cystic duct and then down the common bile duct, before the cystic duct was closed. Subsequently, the stent was used to facilitate performance of a needle knife endoscopic sphincterotomy. The stent was then removed, a cholangiography was performed and the common bile duct was cleared. Patients with persistent jaundice usually had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. RESULTS: Transcystic stenting was the 'intention-to-treat' basis of therapy for 56 of the patients. The placement of the stent only failed once when the stent became trapped in the cystic duct. Complications of the operation included: pain and jaundice (n = 2), cholangitis (n = 1), and pulmonary embolus (n = 1). The median postoperative hospitalization was 2 days (range: 1-15). Five further patients had common bile duct stones removed via a choledochotomy; a stent was placed through the choledochotomy before its closure. The selective common bile duct cannulation rate at the first endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, was 98%. A second endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was required in 15% of patients. The only complication of all the endoscopic procedures was a single case of mild cholangitis; there were no cases of pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: A treatment option open to all surgeons for non-jaundiced patients with known choledocholithiasis or choledocholithiasis found at operative cholangiogram, is the transcystic stenting of the sphincter of Oddi at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. At a subsequent sitting, the common bile duct can be safely cleared endoscopically using a sphincterotomy facilitated by the stent.

Adolescent↗