Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51Linked to original sources

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces acute low back pain during emergency transport.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute low back pain may require emergency transport because of pain and immobilization. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmaceutical therapy for patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of paramedic-administered TENS in patients with acute low back pain during emergency transport. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized study involving 74 patients transported to hospital. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 (n = 36) was treated with true TENS, while group 2 (n = 36) was treated with sham TENS. The authors recorded pain and anxiety as the main outcome variables using a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The authors recorded a significant (p < 0.01) pain reduction (mean +/- standard deviation) during transport in group 1 (79.2 +/- 6.5 mm VAS to 48.9 +/- 8.2 mm VAS), whereas pain scores remained unchanged in group 2 (75.9 +/- 16.4 mm VAS and 77.1 +/- 11.2 mm VAS). Similarly, the scores for anxiety were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in group 1 (81.7 +/- 7.9 mm VAS to 69.2 +/- 12.1 mm VAS) after treatment. No significant change was noted (84.5 +/- 5.8 mm VAS and 83.5 +/- 8.9 mm VAS, respectively) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: TENS was found to be effective and rapid in reducing pain during emergency transport of patients with acute low back pain and should be considered due to its ease of use and lack of side effects in the study population.

Acute Disease↗

[Surgical treatment of low back pain].

Sciatica in low back pain is usually caused by lumbar disc herniation, degenerative spinal disease or lumbar spinal stenosis. Important pathogenetic factors are mechanical compression of and inflammatory changes in nerve roots caused by nucleus pulposus tissue. Decompression of nerve roots and removal of nucleus pulposus tissue are the main surgical goals. Emphasis should be placed on clinical identification of the symptomatic nerve roots. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are the most important diagnostic tools today. Plain X-ray may be required for correct identification of the lowest mobile segment. Functional myelography combined with CT may be required to diagnose lumbar spinal stenosis. A proper selection of patients for surgery seems to be more important for a successful outcome than whether macro- or microsurgery is used, or wether the operation comprises one or several nerve roots. The combination of clear nerve root affection, mechanically provoced pain, and corresponding pathological findings at imaging are the best predictors of successful outcome. Psychosocial stability is an additional positive predictive factor. Impaired fibrinolysis occurring in smokers and in sedentary and obese patients, may be a negative predictive factor.

Decompression, Surgical↗

Psychosocial work characteristics and psychological strain in relation to low-back pain.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low-back pain and the potential intermediate role of psychological strain variables in this relationship. METHODS: The research was part of a prospective cohort study of risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms. The study population consisted of 861 workers from 34 companies in The Netherlands who had no low-back pain at baseline and for whom data on the occurrence of low-back pain were obtained with annual questionnaires during a 3-year follow-up period. Information on psychosocial work characteristics and psychological strain variables was collected using a questionnaire at baseline. Cases of low-back pain were defined as workers who reported, in at least one of the annual follow-up questionnaires, that they had had regular or prolonged low-back pain in the previous 12 months. RESULTS: After adjustment for individual factors and quantified physical load at work, nonsignificant relative risks ranging from 1.3 to 1.6 were observed for high quantitative job demands, high conflicting demands, low supervisory support, and low co-worker support. Decision authority and skill discretion showed no relationship with low-back pain. In general, the estimated relative risks for the psychosocial work characteristics were scarcely influenced by additional adjustment for job satisfaction, emotional exhaustion, and sleeping difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that low social support, from either supervisors or co-workers, appears to be a risk factor for low-back pain. Some indications of a relationship between high quantitative job demands and high conflicting demands and low-back pain were also found. Little evidence was found for an intermediate role for the psychological strain variables under study.

Cohort Studies↗

Detection of simulation among persons instructed to exaggerate symptoms of low back pain.

A verbal pain measure was recently introduced that is accurate in differentiating patients with low back pain from persons who simulate pain. It consists of 103 pain words. Forty-five of these pain words accurately classified 219 out of 262 (83.6%) volunteers without pain who simulated back pain. In this study, 150 subjects with low back pain were administered the pain scale and instructed to exaggerate their pain sufficiently to convince a doctor of back pain that is severe enough to prevent them from working. Similar instructions were given to 267 persons without pain to determine the accuracy of the scale in detecting simulation, when some nidus of pain is present, and also to determine the influence of a pain history on scale accuracy. The pain measure detected 96 of 150 subjects with existing pain for an accuracy rate of 64.0%, and 218 of 267 subjects without pain for an accuracy rate of 81.7%. A selected cutoff score (-1.6) reduced classification error to less than 3% in the subject group with pain. The results underscore the impression that people who have pain to build on will be more difficult to detect when they simulate than people who engage in the process when they are pain free.

Adult↗

Systematic review of conservative interventions for subacute low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of conservative interventions on clinically relevant outcome measures for patients with subacute low back pain. This is particularly important because effective treatment for subacute low back pain will prevent the transition to chronic low back pain, a condition that is largely responsible for the high health care costs of low back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methodological quality of each trial was assessed. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for pain and disability and risk ratios for return to work. RESULTS: Thirteen trials were located, evaluating the following interventions: manipulation, back school, exercise, advice, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hydrotherapy, massage, corset, cognitive behavioural treatment and co-ordination of primary health care. Most studies were of low quality and did not show a statistically significant effect of intervention. For the strict duration of low back pain (six weeks to three months), no evidence of high internal validity was found but when other methodological criteria were considered, evidence was found for the efficacy of advice. Furthermore, there is evidence that when a broader view is taken of the duration of subacute low back pain (seven days to six months), other treatments (e.g. manipulation, exercise, TENS) may be effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our review identified a major gap in the evidence for interventions that are currently recommended in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of subacute low back pain. Lack of a uniform definition of subacute low back pain further limited current evidence.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy↗

[Physiotherapy in low back pain--indications and limits].

These times of changing paradigms raise the question of the indications for and limits of physical therapy in back pain management. At present, several national and international guidelines for the care of chronic back pain are available. Unfortunately, the guidelines are often inconsistent concerning physiotherapy. An encompassing framework for an effective, efficient, and appropriate physiotherapy treatment needs to be developed. Within the German national health system, the "Arzneimittelkommission" [2] issued guidelines for low back pain. These guidelines endeavour to distinguish between disease related specific back pain and non specific back pain of a more functional or mechanical origin. Furthermore, the "Bundesausschuss der Arzte und Krankenkassen" in Germany dispatched guidelines (Heilmittelrichtlinien) for the prescription of "Heilmittel" (remedies other than drugs) on October 16th, 2000. These guidelines seek to appropriately refer, assign and limit the physiotherapy treatment of back pain according to a set indications catalogue. On an international basis, the World Health Organisation (WHO) [21] offers well established guidelines for the "International Classification of Functioning and Disability", 2nd version (ICIDH-2). These guidelines describe the progressive health dysfunction over three major levels: 1) body functions and structures, 2) activities of an individual, and 3) participation of an individual in social and other essential aspects of life. National and international scientific studies support the use of ICIDH-2-categories and suggest that different back pain management is required at different levels of dysfunction. For example, there is a trend to prescribe increasingly active types of treatment instead of passive ones for increasing levels of dysfunction [54]. Multimodal treatment programs [17, 29], which include physical activity, training and psychological programs as well as training of activities of daily living (ADL) ("workhardening program") demonstrate particular benefit in the treatment of chronic low back pain at the disability and handicap level. Current physical therapy on back pain management operates at all three categories of ICIDH-2. Therapists aim to treat local spinal symptoms and their secondary functional changes, reorganise altered physiological patterns and improve the psycho-social state of the patient. This level overlaps with the fields of occupational therapy (training of work related tasks), psychosocial therapy (training of social competence etc.) and physical training (improvement of physical performance). Physical training as a means of physical therapy, combined with certain aspects of occupational therapy, offers an important possibility of transfer into workday life. Borders between neighbouring fields are not sharp. Physical therapy is contraindicated only in rare cases (e.g. clear indications for surgery; predominant psychological disorder). Unfortunately, the national German guidelines for physical therapy (Heilmittelrichtlinien) which have been put in effect by July 1st, 2001 appear to direct the prescription of physical therapy primarily to treating structural and functional dysfunction. At an activity level, occupational therapy is recommended only for the treatment of specific diseases. Moreover, recommendations for physical therapy for patients with an acute impairment and those with a chronic handicap are almost identical. This is not in accordance with the scientific evidence for effective treatment. So far there are no studies investigating the various implications of ICIDH-2-guidelines for physical therapy management of back pain. Considering the ICIDH-2 directives it is not helpful to judge efficacy solely by somatic parameters such as mobility and muscle force. A patient without good mobility could still return to work. A subjective feeling of well being or low disability on the side of the patient is an equally important parameter of successful treatment as the good physical capacity for daily life.

Germany↗

Chronic pain and depression. II. Symptoms of anxiety in chronic low back pain patients and their relationship to subtypes of depression.

The relationship between anxiety and chronic pain has been poorly studied. The authors studied the occurrence of symptoms of anxiety in chronic low back pain patients. Anxious mood and other symptoms of anxiety were commonly seen in patients with chronic low back pain. Symptoms of anxiety were more common in patients with depression, especially those with major depression. Anxious mood, tension and general somatic symptoms of the sensory type were more common than any other type of anxiety symptoms. The authors discuss the potential role of anxiety in chronic pain patients.

Adult↗

"You feel so hopeless": a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain.

BACKGROUND: Biopsychosocial management of non-specific back pain in general practice has been problematical, with frequent inappropriate referral for imaging and secondary care interventions and lack of self-confidence in the ability to provide evidence-based care. AIMS: To examine GP attitudes to managing back pain as a biopsychosocial problem in order to inform future educational strategies that may improve practice. METHODS: Twenty-one GPs from separate practices within the Dorset and Somerset Strategic Health Authority area (UK) participated in telephone interviews leading to the development of vignettes to refine the theoretical framework for subsequent focus group interviews about evidence-based back pain management. Transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS: There were 5 main emergent themes. These were generally negative and dominated by concerns about doctor-patient interaction. They included feelings of frustration, mismatches of perceptions in the doctor-patient relationship, problems in relation to time, challenges and discord between stakeholders in the process (for example, over sickness certification) and a lack of resources for education, awareness and local services to refer to. Psychosocial aspects of the actual care process were rarely raised. Participants favoured education that is multidisciplinary, in small group format and involves the participation of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the difficulties that GPs may have in applying the relevant evidence for the successful management of back pain. A desire to avoid conflict in the relationship with patients explained much of the problem of implementing evidence in general practice. This indicates a need for insightful educational strategies that involve active GP participation.

Acute Disease↗

[The debate on lower back pain and its relationship to work: a retrospective study of workers on sick leave].

Lower back pain has a high prevalence among the Mexican working population, with extensive social and economic repercussions. Official figures show that lower back pain accounts for 10.0 to 15.0% of sick leave excuses. However, this fails to identify any relationship between lower back pain and job conditions, since such leave is only granted if it can be shown that the condition was not work-related. The present study shows that such a relationship does in fact exist. A retrospective study examined all cases (n = 210) in which workers were granted sick leave for lower back pain in an IMSS (Mexican Government Health Insurance) hospital in Mexico City during a seven-year period. The results show the association and interactions between debilitating lower back pain and several work-related variables: job position, time-on-the-job, and physical effort and weight-carrying associated with the position. Causes of lower back pain and the difficulty in obtaining accurate, precise back pain diagnosis are discussed. A number of clinical, epidemiological, and legal strategies for the study and prevention of back pain are suggested.

Case-Control Studies↗

Depressive disorder as a long-term antecedent risk factor for incident back pain: a 13-year follow-up study from the Baltimore Epidemiological Catchment Area sample.

BACKGROUND: The co-occurrence of affective distress and back pain is well documented but the relationship between them is less certain. This study examines the relationship between lifetime occurrence of depressive disorder and incident back pain reported over a 13-year period. METHOD: The Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study is a prospective study of a household-residing cohort, selected probabilistically from East Baltimore in 1981. Between 1982-3 (wave 2) and again between 1993-6 (wave 3), a follow-up study of the original cohort was conducted. Questions on depressive disorder and back pain were drawn from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether depressive disorder acts as a risk factor for incident back pain. RESULTS: In cross-sectional analyses, lifetime occurrence of depressive disorder was a significant correlate of lifetime prevalence of back pain at wave 1 (OR = 1.6, P = 0.01). During the 13-year follow-up, across three data collection points, there was an increase in the risk for incident back pain when depressive disorder was present at baseline (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.03, 3.4). However, during the short-term follow-up period of 1 year, between baseline and wave 2, depressive disorder at baseline was unrelated to first-ever reports of back pain. Lifetime depressive disorder in both waves 1 (baseline) and 2 (1 year later) was associated with a more than three times greater risk for a first-ever report of back pain during the 12 to 13 year follow-up period, in comparison to those who did not have depressive disorder at waves 1 or 2 (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.4, 7.8). Back pain at wave 1 was not significantly associated with an increased risk for depression in the longitudinal analysis (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5, 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive disorder appears to be a risk factor for incident back pain independent of other characteristics often associated with back pain. Back pain is not a short-term consequence of depressive disorder but emerges over periods longer than 1 year. Moreover, in this study the alternative pathway of back pain as a risk factor for depressive disorder could not be supported.

Back Pain↗

Biomedical and feminist perspectives on low back pain during pregnancy.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common symptom seen by nurses who provide care for people with orthopedic problems. Many women experience their first episodes of LBP during pregnancy. Two perspectives for exploring LBP, biomedical and feminist, are described in this article. A combination of these perspectives might best serve women. Also, examples from a research project that used both perspectives is provided.

Attitude to Health↗

Epidemiology of back pain in a representative cohort of Italian persons 65 years of age and older: the InCHIANTI study.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinico-epidemiologic study in the Chianti area (Tuscany, Italy). OBJECTIVES: To describe prevalence and correlates of back pain in a representative sample of the population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain is common in old age and is related to functional limitations, but back pain characteristics and correlates in older adults, which may be targeted by specific interventions, are still underinvestigated. METHODS: A total of 1,299 persons aged 65 or older were selected from the city registry of Greve in Chianti and Bagno a Ripoli; 1,008 (565 women; 443 men) were included in this analysis. Back pain in the past 12 months was ascertained using a questionnaire. Potential correlates of back pain were identified in age- and sex-adjusted regression analyses, and their independent association with back pain was tested in a multivariate model. RESULTS: The prevalence of frequent back pain was 31.5%. Back pain was reported less often by men and the very old, was primarily located in the dorsolumbar and lumbar spine, was moderate in intensity and mainly elicited by carrying, lifting, and pushing heavy objects. Among participants who reported frequent back pain, 76.3% had no back pain-related impairments; 7.4% of the overall study population had back pain-related functional limitation. Back pain participants were significantly more likely to report difficulty in heavy household chores, carrying a shopping bag, cutting toenails, and using public transportation. Limited trunk extension, depression, low levels of prior-year physical activity, and hip, knee, and foot pain were independent correlates of back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent back pain is highly prevalent in the older population and is often associated with conditions that are potentially reversible.

Activities of Daily Living↗

[Prevention of and action on low back pain].

Prevention of low back pain involves action from both the healthcare system and the occupational system. These systems are essentially diverse and optimum solution of the problem relies on collaboration. The focus of this paper is on the occupational system, where summarised documentation--in spite of scientific uncertainty--in general supports the occupational health actions taken in Denmark. Furthermore, the paper points towards increased physically active lifestyle as a preventive action.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

Impact of musculoskeletal co-morbidity of neck and upper extremities on healthcare utilisation and sickness absence for low back pain.

AIMS: To describe the presence of musculoskeletal co-morbidity of the neck and upper extremities among industrial workers with low back pain, and to examine whether it has an impact on healthcare utilisation and sickness absence for low back pain. METHODS: A self administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 505 industrial workers (response 86%). RESULTS: The 12 month prevalence of low back pain was 50%. Among subjects with low back pain the 12 month prevalence of musculoskeletal co-morbidity of the neck and upper extremities was 68%. Among workers with low back pain, subjects with high pain intensity or disabling low back pain were more likely to have musculoskeletal co-morbidity. In comparison to the subjects who report back pain only, subjects with co-morbidity showed worse general health and health related quality of life. No impact of upper extremity co-morbidity was found on healthcare utilisation, and sickness absence due to low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides no evidence that musculoskeletal co-morbidity of the neck and upper extremities influences the choice to seek care or take sick leave due to low back pain among industrial manual workers. For occupational health practitioners the finding of a high co-morbidity is important to consider when implementing workplace interventions aimed at the reduction of specific musculoskeletal complaints, since the controls for one musculoskeletal complaint may impact adversely on another musculoskeletal complaint. Researchers who perform low back pain intervention studies using generic health measures, should take into account the impact of musculoskeletal co-morbidity on these measures.

Absenteeism↗

Exploring the experiences of partners who live with a chronic low back pain sufferer.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a condition that causes individuals considerable distress. It also presents a significant challenge to the health service and is often viewed by clinicians as frustrating to manage. The purpose of the present paper is to explore the experiences of individuals in the immediate social sphere of those suffering from CLBP and their role in care-giving for their partner. An approach was taken using two qualitative research methods to gather data: journals and focus groups. Findings from the journals and the focus groups revealed issues for partners of CLBP sufferers in relation to living with their partners' pain, perceptions of healthcare and the dominance of illness over social contacts. Key themes revealed the complex emotions experienced by respondents, and underlined the need for their role as care givers and partners to be acknowledged by healthcare professionals. The data also highlighted respondents' desire to have greater involvement in their partners' healthcare, which includes provision of relevant information and involvement with therapeutic interventions. The findings emphasise the need for healthcare professionals to include and acknowledge partners and others in the immediate social sphere of patients in the management of chronic conditions.

Back Pain↗

Value of consensual ratings in differentiating organic and functional low back pain.

Evaluated 40 low back pain patients by a multidisciplinary team (orthopedic surgeons, nursing staff and a medical psychologist) to identify the behavioral characteristics associated with functional and organic determinants of pain. Significant relationships were found between orthopedists' clinical judgments and higher scores on MMPI scales F, HS, and MA, between nurses' ratings and higher scores on MMPI scales D, PA, PT, and SI, and on the Zung Depression Scale and STAI Trait-Anxiety scale. Physicians and nurses consensually agreed on 27 cases. Behavioral observations of the orthopedists and the nursing staff revealed contrasting patterns of behavior for those patients classified as organic or functional. The power of the consensual rating method and its usefulness in clinical appraisals were discussed.

Adult↗

The impact of social deprivation on chronic back pain outcomes.

Chronic low back pain is the commonest cause of disability for adults of working age. It is a complex problem frequently encapsulated as a bio-psychosocial issue, yet the social element has received less attention than it deserves, particularly for low-income and socially deprived patients. Rehabilitation programmes are often based on increasing function through cognitive and behavioural techniques, which, for many reasons, may be less effective for the socially disadvantaged. In this paper we discuss the potential barriers to successful rehabilitation in socially deprived groups and we look at possible factors that may need to be considered when designing interventions.

Back Pain↗

The prevalence and cause of occupational back pain in Hong Kong registered nurses.

It is well known that many patient-oriented tasks contribute to occupational back pain in nurses and this is borne out by previous studies. In order to know whether the incidence of back pain and the contributing factors are the same in Hong Kong, a descriptive study was adopted to investigate the situation locally. This study explored the prevalence and perceived contributing factors of back pain, utilizing a non-experimental survey approach. Baseline data for this study were gathered by means of a questionnaire. The questionnaire elicited characteristics of the subjects' history and contributing factors to back pain. Of 47 nursing staff at an acute care hospital, the reported occurrence of some form of back pain during their career was found to be 80.9%. Approximately one-third of nurses with back-pain experienced pain at least once a month. The top two dynamic factors contributing to back pain were lifting patients and transferring patients. Meanwhile, stooping was identified as the most common static factor contributing to back pain. In addition of those who had experienced some form of back pain, 92.1% stated that they have never reported their back pain to their employers. Contributing factors such as transferring patients from bed to chair and lifting patients within bed without assistance indicate poor practice which should be eliminated by the existence of continuing in-service education.

Adult↗