Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “refractive error”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Dark focus of accommodation in children with accommodative esotropia and hyperopic anisometropia.

We evaluated the dark focus of accommodation, referred to as tonic accommodation, in 60 young hyperopic subjects, 20 with and 20 without accommodative esotropia, and 20 with hyperopic anisometropia. We measured the distance, dark, and cycloplegic refractive errors by the Nidek Autorefractometer AR1600. The difference between dark and cycloplegic refractive errors was defined as the dark focus. The dark focus was significantly larger in esotropic eyes than in non-esotropic eyes, despite similar cycloplegic refractive errors in both types of eyes, suggesting that tonic accommodation may be associated with ocular position. The dark focus was similar in eyes of the same subjects with hyperopic anisometropia and also in normal and amblyopic eyes, suggesting that tonic accommodation is similar in both eyes in subjects with anisometropia and amblyopia.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed2001

Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project.

PURPOSE: To study the cause-specific prevalence of eye diseases causing bilateral visual impairment in Australian adults. DESIGN: Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 40 years and older and resident in their homes at the time of recruitment for the study. The study was conducted during 1992 through 1996. METHODS: The study uses a cluster stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban, and rural Victoria. Participants completed a standardized interview and eye examination, including presenting and best-corrected visual acuity, visual fields, and dilated ocular examination. The major cause of vision loss was identified for all participants found to be visually impaired. Population-based prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect the age and gender distribution of the two cohorts in Victoria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual impairment was defined by four levels of severity on the basis of best-corrected visual acuity or visual field: <6/18 > or =6/60 and/or <20 degrees > or =10 degrees radius field, moderate vision impairment; severe vision impairment, <6/60 > or =3/60 and/or <10 degrees > or =5 degrees radius field; and profound vision impairment <3/60 and/or <5 degrees radius field. In addition, less-than-legal driving vision, <6/12 > or =6/18, and/or homonymous hemianopia were defined as mild vision impairment. In Australia, legal blindness includes severe and profound vision impairment. RESULTS: The population-weighted prevalence of diseases causing less-than-legal driving or worse impairment in the better eye was 42.48/1000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.11, 54.86). Uncorrected refractive error was the most frequent cause of bilateral vision impairment, 24.68/1000 (95% CI, 16.12, 33.25), followed by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 3.86/1000 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.55); other retinal diseases, 2.91/1000 (95% CI, 0.74, 5.08); other disorders, 2.80/1000 (95% CI, 1.17, 4.43); cataract, 2.57/1000 (95% CI, 1.38, 3.76); glaucoma, 2.32/1000 (95% CI, 0.72, 3.92); neuro-ophthalmic disorders, 1.80/1000 (95% CI, 0, 4.11); and diabetic retinopathy, 1.53/1000 (95% CI, 0.71, 2.36). The prevalence of legal blindness was 5.30/1000 (95% CI, 3.24, 7.36). Although not significantly different, the causes of legal blindness were uncorrected refractive errors, AMD, glaucoma, other retinal conditions, and other diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reduction of visual impairment may be attained with the application of current knowledge in refractive errors, diabetes mellitus, cataract, and glaucoma. Although easily preventable, uncorrected refractive error remains a major cause of vision impairment.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Pakistan. The Pakistan national blindness and visual impairment survey.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the causes of blindness and visual impairment in adults (> or =30 years old) in Pakistan, and to explore socio-demographic variations in cause. METHODS: A multi-stage, stratified, cluster random sampling survey was used to select a nationally representative sample of adults. Each subject was interviewed, had their visual acuity measured and underwent autorefraction and fundus/optic disc examination. Those with a visual acuity of <6/12 in either eye underwent a more detailed ophthalmic examination. Causes of visual impairment were classified according to the accepted World Health Organization (WHO) methodology. An exploration of demographic variables was conducted using regression modeling. RESULTS: A sample of 16 507 adults (95.5% of those enumerated) was examined. Cataract was the most common cause of blindness (51.5%; defined as <3/60 in the better eye on presentation) followed by corneal opacity (11.8%), uncorrected aphakia (8.6%) and glaucoma (7.1%). Posterior capsular opacification accounted for 3.6% of blindness. Among the moderately visually impaired (<6/18 to > or =6/60), refractive error was the most common cause (43%), followed by cataract (42%). Refractive error as a cause of severe visual impairment/blindness was significantly higher in rural dwellers than in urban dwellers (odds ratio (OR) 3.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 11.7). Significant provincial differences were also identified. Overall we estimate that 85.5% of causes were avoidable and that 904 000 adults in Pakistan have cataract (<6/60) requiring surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive survey provides reliable estimates of the causes of blindness and visual impairment in Pakistan. Despite expanded surgical services, cataract still accounts for over half of the cases of blindness in Pakistan. One in eight blind adults has visual loss from sequelae of cataract surgery. Services for refractive errors need to be further expanded and integrated into eye care services, particularly those serving rural populations.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pursuit eye movements in late-onset esotropia.

Horizontal, smooth pursuit eye movements were recorded from adults and children with infantile and late-onset esotropia using a remote, video-based, eye-movement recording system. Each subject monocularly tracked a 0.5-degree target moving back and forth on a video monitor at a constant velocity of 10 degrees, over a range of 12 degrees. Each subject's nasal and temporal gain (eye velocity/target velocity) was measured. Confirming the results of previous studies, we found that infantile esotropes had asymmetrical pursuit eye movements (nasal gain greater than temporal gain) while late-onset esotropes had symmetrical gains. However, unlike previous investigators, we found that half of the late-onset esotropes had impaired pursuit gain. The magnitude of the pursuit abnormality and the amount of refractive error were correlated--patients with the highest refractive error had the lowest pursuit gain.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Influence of refractive correction on peripheral visual field in static perimetry.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of refractive errors on peripheral visual field thresholds in automated static perimetry. METHODS: In 47 subjects (age 16-49 years), the difference of perimetric thresholds was tested in the peripheral visual field without and with contact lens correction, using a custom-made program (Goldmann stimulus size III) with the automated perimeter Octopus 2000 R. Refractive errors ranged from -16.75 to +12.5 diopters. Sixty-four test locations on three concentric rings between 30 degrees and 50 degrees in 19 hyperopic and 28 myopic eyes were tested. RESULTS: All rings in myopic eyes revealed a significant influence of refraction on the differential light sensitivity in the peripheral visual field. In hyperopic eyes only the inner ring showed a significant influence of refraction. The decrease in sensitivity, measured in dB/diopter, for the myopic inner ring was 0.75; for the myopic middle ring it was 0.46; for the myopic outer ring it was 0.22; and for the hyperopic inner ring it was 0.40. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association between refractive errors and differential light sensitivity exists in the peripheral visual field of myopic eyes. Therefore, contact lens wear is recommended when performing automated perimetry of the peripheral visual field of myopic patients with higher refractive errors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Contact lens wear after photorefractive keratectomy: comparison between rigid gas permeable and soft contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To determine if rigid gas permeable (RGP) or soft contact lenses can be successfully worn after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct residual refractive errors. METHODS: Patients with residual stable ametropia after PRK were fit with RGP or soft lenses. Manifest refraction, corneal topography, and keratometry were performed, and post-PRK corneal haze was graded during the study visits. Contact lens fit characteristics and comfort were assessed. Lens centration, visual quality, and ocular surface status were graded, and visual acuity with contact lenses was charted. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were recruited for RGP lens fitting. The mean refractive error post-PRK was +0.80 D +/- 2.03 (range: -3.50 to+3.00 D). The mean contact lens power was -3.90 D +/- 2.03 (range: 0 to -7.00 D), and the mean contact lens base curve was 7.88 mm +/-0.16. A significant positive tear film at the site of the central ablation was noted, contributing to excessive minus lens power in all cases. Despite mild to moderate lens instability and de-centration, 14 patients reported excellent visual quality with the lenses, and pre-PRK best-corrected acuity was achieved in all patients. Twenty-five percent (4 of 16) of the patients were able to wear the lenses all day. Eleven patients were recruited for soft contact lens fitting-five from the RGP trial. The mean refractive error post-PRK was -0.64 D +/- 2.01 (range: -3.50 to +1.75D). The mean contact lens power was -0.60 D +/- 2.07 (range: -3.75 to +2.5 D), and the mean contact lens base curve was 8.33 mm +/- 0.42. Eight patients were corrected with lenses to their pre-PRK best-corrected acuity, and nine patients reported excellent visual quality with the lenses. All the patients had excellent lens centration. Thirty-six percent (four of 11) of patients were wearing the lenses all day. CONCLUSIONS: Fitting RGP lenses after PRK results in good visual acuity but may be associated with mild to moderate lens instability and decentration. Soft contact lens fitting also results in good visual acuity. Soft lenses were better tolerated by the subjects in our study because of improved lens centration and stability.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and agreement of refractive error measurements and the repeatability of axial length (AL) measurements in patients after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, USA. METHODS: Subjective refraction, autorefraction measurements with the Grand Seiko and Humphrey autorefractors, and AL measurements with the IOLMaster were completed for 40 previously myopic LASIK patients under noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions on 2 separate occasions. RESULTS: The mean difference between visits for axial length measurements was 0.008 mm +/- 0.04 (SD). The between visits repeatability for all refractive error measurements were <0.75 diopter (D). The mean difference between the subjective refraction and the Humphrey autorefractor for spherical equivalent was statistically significant under noncycloplegic conditions (-0.90 D, P<.0001) and cycloplegic conditions (-2.05 D, P<.0001). The mean difference between subjective refraction and Grand Seiko autorefraction measurements was not significant under noncycloplegic conditions (+0.05 D, 95% limits of agreement [LoA]=-0.99, 1.09; P=.52) conditions but was statistically significant, but not clinically relevant, under cycloplegic conditions (+0.17 D, 95% LoA=-0.73, 1.07; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error measurements after LASIK using the Grand Seiko autorefractor are reliable and agree well with subjective refraction measurements.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Optic disc size in a population based study in northern China: the Beijing Eye Study.

AIM: To determine the optic disc size in the adult Chinese population in an urban and a rural region of Beijing. METHODS: The population based, cross sectional cohort study included 4439 subjects out of 5324 subjects invited to participate (response rate 83.4%). It was divided into a rural part (1973 (44.4%) subjects) and an urban part (2466 (55.6%) subjects). Mean age was 56.2 (SD 10.6) years (range 40-101 years). Colour optic disc photographs were morphometrically examined. Main outcome measure was optic disc area. RESULTS: Optic disc photographs were available for 4027 (90.7%) subjects. Mean optic disc area measured 2.65 (0.57) mm2 (range 1.03 mm2-7.75 mm2). Optic disc area was significantly (p<0.001) correlated with myopic refractive error, with a steep decrease in optic disc area from high myopia to the mid-range of refractive error, a slightly horizontal course in the refractive error range between -8 dioptres and +4 dioptres, and a further decrease in optic disc area towards higher hyperopia. Optic disc area was not related to age (p = 0.14) or sex (p = 0.93) (optic disc area, males: 2.65 (0.56) mm2 versus females: 2.65 (0.57) mm2). "Microdiscs" may be defined as smaller than 1.51 mm2, and "macrodiscs" as larger than 3.79 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with data of preceding studies, mean optic disc size is larger in Chinese people than in white people. In Chinese people highly hyperopic eyes have significantly smaller optic discs, and highly myopic eyes have significantly larger optic discs than emmetropic eyes.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor.

PURPOSE: Autorefractors are typically based on either the optometer or the Scheiner principles, or a combination of the two techniques. These devices have dominated the market for objective assessment of refractive error for >30 years. The purpose of this investigation is to test a Shack-Hartmann-based system as an alternative to these systems. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with varying levels of refractive error were measured with a Topcon autorefractor and a Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor. Fourier transform techniques were used to extract sphere, cylinder, and axis information from the Shack-Hartmann images, avoiding the need for image processing. The deviation of the refractive error from a subjective refraction was used as a means of comparing the two devices. RESULTS: The two devices performed similarly on this group of subjects. The mean difference in refraction between the two devices was nearly zero, suggesting that the likelihood and magnitude of errors for the two devices are equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The Shack-Hartmann-based autorefractor shows promise as an alternative to conventional optometer or Scheiner-based technologies. However, issues with extending the myopic range of the device still need to be resolved.

Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological↗
PubMed1986

Photorefraction with a catadioptric lens. Improvement on the method of Kaakinen.

Kaakinen (1979) presented a method of measuring refractive error and ocular alignment by simultaneous photography of corneal and fundus reflexes. As presented, the technique was unable to detect refractive errors of less than 2-3 diopters (Howland 1980; Kaakinen 1979). We demonstrate that the use of a catadioptric lens and a long working distance can improve sensitivity to less than 1.0 D. Refractions of a model eye, an accommodating eye and ametropic eyes indicate that refractive errors greater than 0.75 D are readily detectable. The improvement in sensitivity achieved by the present system is attributable to a reduction of the angle between the flash source and the entrance pupil of the photorefractor.

Accommodation, Ocular↗
PubMed1977

Lamellar transplants in keratoconus.

Lamellar keratoplasty was done in 18 eyes with keratoconus in an attempt to obtain a more satisfactory postoperative refractive error than that after penetrating keratoplasty. The refractive error after lamellar keratoplasty was better than that after 7.5-mm penetrating keratoplasties, but the vision was not as good. Because of the poorer vision, lamellar keratoplasty should probably be reserved for those with large eccentric cones and patients who are not good candidates for penetrating transplants.

Astigmatism↗
PubMed1987

Intraocular lens power calculations. A practical evaluation in normal subjects at the Wilmer Institute.

The practical value of preoperative intraocular lens power calculations in "normal" eyes with less than 4.50 diopters (D) of myopia or hyperopia was evaluated in a consecutive series of 520 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and lens implantation by four experienced surgeons at The Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute. The observed postoperative results with the lenses selected by the surgeons were compared with results calculated for the measurement-predicted emmetropic power lens and for a standard 20-D lens. The need for postoperative spectacle correction of residual refractive errors was comparable for all three choices of lens. Only two eyes (0.4%) would have developed greater than 4.00 D of refractive error with either the "implanted" or "predicted-emmetropic" lenses, as would 11 eyes (2.1%) with the "standard" 20-D lens. The surgeons' deviation from the calculated emmetropic lens did not reduce postoperative refractive error.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity of a unique pupil-size based set of referral criteria of the MTI PhotoScreener(Medical Technology and Innovations, Inc, Cedar Falls, Iowa) to detect high magnitude refractive error. METHODS: The photoscreening photographs of 949 preschool children previously analyzed were reevaluated with the new referral criteria. The original photographs had been obtained from pediatricians' offices and public health and Women, Infants, and Children's (WIC) clinics. The results of this analysis were compared with the gold standard clinical examination and cycloplegic refraction. Sensitivities were calculated for amblyogenic factors based on the magnitude of the refractive error. RESULTS: For 26 patients with anisometropia, the sensitivity to detect anisometropia increased from 46% for +1.25 or greater spherical interocular difference to 100% for +2.50 spherical intraocular difference. For 36 patients with hypermetropia in at least 1 meridian ranging from +3.75 to +7.50 D, sensitivity increased from 53% to detect +3.75 D or greater to 70% for +5.00 D or greater. The sensitivity to detect hypermetropia of +5.75 D or greater was 100%. These criteria detected 82% of patients with astigmatism greater than or equal to +3.00 D, and 100% of patients with astigmatism greater than +3.50 D. CONCLUSION: It is crucial that screening programs avoid over-referrals caused by high false-positive screening rates. The sensitivity of our new criteria increases with higher magnitude refractive error; patients with moderate and severe amblyogenic factors are almost never missed. While the sensitivity to detect lower magnitude refractive error is poor, the amblyogenic impact of such errors remains to be determined.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed1994

Ocular abnormalities in children from a Malaysian school for the deaf.

The prevalence of ocular abnormalities was studied in 165 children from a Malaysian school for the deaf. Ninety-five children (57.6%) had one or more ocular abnormalities. Rubella retinopathy was the commonest form of ocular abnormality (35.2%). Refractive errors were found in 23 children (13.9%). Refractive errors in the rubella group were significantly more common than in the non-rubella group of deaf children (p < 0.001) (chi 2 test). Thirteen children had congenital anomalies causing significantly impaired vision. Ophthalmological examination of deaf children helps in the detection of cases with rubella eye signs and thus helps to identify the cause of deafness. Since deaf children are at greater risk of visual and ocular abnormalities, periodical ophthalmological examination should be carried out in these children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) between 1 week and 6 months after surgery. METHODS: All eyes underwent PRK or LASIK with the VisX StarS2 excimer laser. We retrospectively analyzed data from 77 random eyes of 77 patients in the PRK group and 76 eyes of 76 patients in the LASIK group. All eyes had a low myopic refractive error (spherical equivalent range, -0.88 diopters (D) to -5.13 D; mean PRK. -2.8 +/- 0.20 D: LASIK, -2.5 +/- 0.22 D). Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refractive error were evaluated 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Each eye undergoing PRK was paired with an eye undergoing LASIK for a similar level of spherical equivalent. Mean uncorrected visual acuity after 1 week was 0.85 +/- 0.06 (20/25, logMAR 0.12 +/- 0.04) for the PRK group and 1.01 +/- 0.06 (20/20, logMAR 0.01 +/- 0.03) for the LASIK group (p < 0.001). Mean spherical equivalent after 1 week was 0.23 +/- 0.12 D for the PRK group and -0.02 +/- 0.07 D for the LASIK group (p = 0.02). Mean uncorrected visual acuity after 1 month was 1.03 +/- 0.05 (20/20, logMAR 0.02 +/- 0.03) for the PRK group and 1.05 +/- 0.05 (20/20. -0.02 +/- 0.03) for the LASIK group (p = 0.16). Mean spherical equivalent after I month was 0.19 +/- 0.10 D for the PRK group and -0.02 +/- 0.09 D for the LASIK group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02), but was unlikely to be clinically significant. Mean uncorrected visual acuity after 6 months was 1.05 +/- 0.06 (20/20, logMAR -0.01 +/- 0.03) for the PRK group and 1.06 +/- 0.05 (20/20, logMAR -0.14 +/- 0.03) for the LASIK group (p = 0.41). Mean spherical equivalent after 6 months was 0.02 +/- 0.08 D for the PRK group and 0.00 +/- 0.08 D for the LASIK group (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Uncorrected visual acuity 1 week after surgery is significantly better in eyes undergoing LASIK than in eyes undergoing PRK. Both procedures provide functional vision by 1 week after surgery. The difference does not relate to refractive error, which was similar between the two groups, but to differences in healing of the epithelium. By 1 month after surgery, there is no difference in mean uncorrected visual acuity between eyes that undergo PRK or LASIK for low myopia.

Cornea↗
PubMed1983

Oblique effects, vertical effects and meridional amblyopia in monkeys.

Orientation anisotropies were investigated for monkeys with normal visual acuity and for monkeys with experimentally induced amblyopia. It was found that the majority of control monkeys showed a normal oblique effect if any existing refractive errors were carefully corrected, but a few of the control monkeys had a meridional amblyopia, i.e., an orientation anisotropy in which the grating orientation for the greatest and lowest contrast sensitivities were correlated with the principal meridians of an astigmatic refractive error even when the refractive error was corrected. For monkeys with strabismic amblyopia caused by a surgically induced divergent strabismus, the orientation anisotropies showed a vertical effect in which contrast sensitivity was lower for vertically oriented gratings than for horizontally oriented gratings. However, monkeys with the same degree of amblyopia resulting from experimental procedures that did not involve a misalignment of the visual axes showed orientation anisotropies that corresponded to the usual oblique effect.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed2002

[Experience with laser in situ keratomileusis].

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in groups with different refractive errors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 LASIK procedure have been performed in the following patient groups: Group 1 (-3.0 D to -6.0 D) n = 14; Group 2 (-6.25 D to -9.0 D) n = 29; Group 3 (-9.25 D to -14.0 D) n = 13; Group 4 (eyes with hyperopic refractive error between +1.75 D and +7.5 D) n = 12. A Moria CB manual mikrokeratom was used, flap thickness was 130 microns. Excimer laser treatment was carried out with Asclepion-Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan flying spot excimer laser. Follow-up time is 6 months. RESULTS: The preoperative correction decreased in Group 1. from -4.45 D +/- 0.93 D (SE = spherical equivalent) to -0.04 D +/- 0.13 D, in Group 2. from -7.81 D +/- 0.98 D (SE) to -0.56 D +/- 0.9 D, in Group 3. from -11.33 D +/- 1.97 D (SE) to -1.88 D +/- 1.64 D, and in Group 4. from +4.67 D +/- 1.67 D (SE) to +0.24 D +/- 0.50 D 6 months following LASIK. The best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) decreased by 2 or more Snellen lines in 4 eyes in Group 2, in 2 eyes in Group 3, and there was no change in Group 1 and Group 4. BSCVA improved by 2 or more Snellen lines in one eye in Group 2, in 2 eyes in Group 3 and there was no change in Group 1 and in Group 4. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative correction decreased significantly following LASIK procedure in each patient group. The method was found to be effective, safe and durable during the 6 months follow-up. Application is recommended especially in eyes with a refractive error higher than -6.0 D due to possible intra- and early postoperative complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Assessment of nuclear sclerosis after nonvitrectomizing vitreous surgery.

PURPOSE: Nuclear sclerosis develops frequently after successful pars plana vitrectomy. We evaluated changes in the degree of nuclear sclerosis after nonvitrectomizing vitreous surgery for idiopathic epimacular proliferation. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients (41 eyes) underwent removal of idiopathic epimacular proliferation by nonvitrectomizing vitreous surgery and were followed postoperatively for at least 12 months. Visual acuity, refractive error, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and Scheimpflug photographs were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate changes in the degree of lenticular opacification. Quantitative analysis of the nuclear sclerosis was performed by densitometry with Scheimpflug photographs performed on only the last 21 patients. We evaluated these measurements by comparing statistically the preoperative and postoperative difference between both eyes (operative eye minus nonoperative ocular data). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the progression of nuclear sclerosis or degree of myopic shift between the operated and fellow eyes during postoperative follow-up (mean +/- SD, 22 +/- 8 months; median, 22 months; range, 12 to 48 months). The average preoperative and postoperative refractive errors in operated eyes were 0.0 +/- 2.4 diopters and 0.1 +/- 2.5 diopters, respectively; the average difference in the refractive errors between both eyes was -0.2 +/- 0.7 diopter preoperatively and -0.2 +/- 0.9 diopter postoperatively (P =.961, paired t test). The average preoperative and postoperative nuclear density values by Scheimpflug photography in 21 operated eyes were, respectively, 72 +/- 18 nuclear density units and 75 +/- 17 nuclear density units; the average difference in nuclear density values between both eyes was -1 +/- 4 nuclear density units preoperatively and 0 +/- 6 nuclear density units postoperatively (P =.631, paired t test). CONCLUSION: Progression of nuclear sclerotic cataract based on changes in refractive error and Scheimpflug photography was not observed after nonvitrectomizing vitreous surgery.

Aged↗