Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50Linked to original sources

Posterior approach to the rectum for treatment of selected benign lesions.

Access to lesions in the mid-rectum can be difficult. This report summarizes our experience with a posterior approach to the rectum in 22 men and 13 women, age range 21 to 96 years. Surgical indications included villous tumours, rectal prolapse, rectal strictures or rectal fistulae. No postoperative complications were observed in 20 patients, but fistulae developed in seven patients, of whom three required proximal colostomy and surgical treatment. Four healed spontaneously. Two patients developed sacrococcygeal hernia. Pathologic examination of villous tumour showed extensive malignant change in three cases requiring rectal resection with end-to-end colo-anal anastomosis. In two patients mild incontinence developed, treated by biofeedback. Residual peri-anal pain was reported by two patients. The posterior approach to the rectum is particularly useful for benign lesions too high for a transanal resection and too low for a transabdominal resection.

Adenoma↗

Enterocele is correctable using the Ripstein rectopexy.

PURPOSE: About one-third of the patients with rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception have concurrent enterocele at defecography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Ripstein procedure on the concurrent enterocele and to study the outcome of the procedure with respect to the patients' symptoms. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with enterocele and either rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception at defecography were treated using the Ripstein procedure. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated with clinical examination (22 patients) and defecography (16 patients). RESULTS: None of the patients had recurrence of enterocele, rectal prolapse, or intussusception at postoperative follow-up. Continence was improved in 15 of 16 incontinent patients. Emptying difficulties were unchanged in eight patients, improved in five patients, and had deteriorated in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Enterocele is corrected by using the Ripstein rectopexy. Persisting defecation difficulties after the Ripstein procedure are unlikely to be secondary to enterocele. The Ripstein procedure can be an alternative in the treatment of enterocele, as a majority of these patients also have rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception.

Defecation↗

[Defecography in rectal wall prolapse conditions].

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic floor and rectal prolapse conditions have greatly benefitted by new imaging and instrumental diagnostic approaches, and especially defecography, for both pathophysiological interpretation and differential diagnosis. We investigated the efficacy of defecography in the assessment of rectal prolapse, and in particular the role of videoproctography in diagnosing such dynamic disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected 224 patients with rectal prolapse from a series of 1,190 consecutive subjects with evacuation disturbances examined in the last 5 years with defecography combined with videoproctography. The patients were 176 women and 48 men ranging in age 32-79 years (mean: 48). Defecography was carried out with Mahieu's technique, but we changed the filter position slightly. Sixty-seven per cent of our patients had been submitted to sigmoidoscopy, but this examination does not usually show rectal intussusception. Occult blood test in feces and double contrast barium enema were carried out in 42% and 38% of cases, respectively, to exclude any organic conditions of colon. RESULTS: Mucosal prolapse was more frequent than intussusception (71% and 34%, respectively); rectal walls went out through the anus in 12 cases of anorectal intussusception and thus caused external rectal prolapse. Rectal prolapse was associated with other anorectal alterations, such as rectocele, perineal descent and puborectalis muscle syndrome, in 96 cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic changes of ampulla are well depicted by videoproctography, which showed anorectum normalization and spontaneous reduction of invagination after intussusception. Defecography exhibited good capabilities in showing rectal wall function abnormalities. Finally, some features of videoproctography such as low radiation dose, noninvasiveness and ease of execution, make the examination acceptable to patients with anorectal disorders and for the follow-up of rectal prolapse.

Adult↗

Long-term management of chronic constipation in children.

A retrospective clinical study was conducted to determine the success of a strict regimen employing the prolonged use of daily enemas in 203 children with chronic constipation. This study confirmed that the use of long-term daily enemas did eliminate constipation as well as the primary complaint of fecal soiling. The majority of children treated had an excellent to good result (85.8%) over an extended period of time. Patients with a past medical history of imperforate anus or Hirschsprung's disease required longer treatment periods (32.6 and 20.1 months, respectively) than children with other medical problems (rectal prolapse, rectal stricture, malrotation, spina bifida, mental retardation, psychological; 13 months) or patients with functional constipation (5.9 months).

Adolescent↗

[Long stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan-Morgan procedure: short- and long-term results of a randomised, controlled, prospective trial].

The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term results of treatment for haemorrhoids by prospectively comparing two techniques, namely, stapled rectal prolapse mucosectomy according to Longo and open hemorrhoidectomy. One hundred consecutive patients were randomised to stapled (50 patients) or manual hemorrhoidectomy (50 patients). We analysed postoperative pain, preoperative and postoperative anorectal function, intraoperative and postoperative complications, time needed to return to work and to normal social activities, and costs. Long-term follow data were obtained by means of an outpatient visit. The operative time of the stapled technique was less than that of open haemorrhoidectomy (22 vs 35 minutes). Two cases of early postoperative bleeding occurred after the stapled technique. The mean pain score on a visual scale was significantly less in patients undergoing the stapled technique. In addition, the time needed to return to work and to normal social activities was significantly less after the stapled technique, which, however, proved to be a more expensive procedure. Stapled mucosectomy of the prolapsed rectal mucosa is a safe, rapid, and relatively painless technique, which has a low incidence of complications. It can be performed in a day surgery unit. Patient satisfaction, early return to normal activities and good long-term results counterbalance the high cost of the procedure.

Adult↗

[Functional evaluation of the anorectal region].

Defecography is a method allowing the morphodynamic evaluation of the anorectal region. The technique we employed needs two complementary times: "phase" defecography and dynamic defecography. In our series of patients affected with severe constipation, 2 groups could be identified. Group A included those patients (mean age: 38.7 years) in whom no significant changes were observed in anorectal angle and in the distance of anorectal angle from pubococcygeal line in comparison with normal subjects (Student's t-test). Group B included those patients (mean age: 63.3 years) in whom significant reduction was observed in anorectal angle on straining, together with increased distance of anorectal angle from pubococcygeal line on squeezing in comparison with normal subjects (Student's t-test). In constipated patients narrowed anal canal was observed (60%), together with rectocele (42.6%), mucosal prolapse (27.8%), rectal prolapse (18%) and solitary ulcer (14.7%). In idiopathic incontinence patients (mean age: 63.3 years), increased distance was observed of anorectal angle from pubococcygeal line on squeezing and, in the most severe cases, even at rest, with the patient sitting (Student's t-test). In incontinent patients larger anal canal was observed (67.6%), together with rectocele (36.7%), mucosal prolapse (14.7%), and rectal prolapse (11.7%).

Adult↗

Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate operative mortality, morbidity, and functional results after Ripstein rectopexy for rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with rectal prolapse and 43 with internal rectal intussusception were included. All patient records were studied and complications registered. Long-term follow-up was possible in 105 patients and performed by clinical examination and standardized interview, telephone interview, or patient records. Seventy-six patients were prospectively evaluated, comparing bowel function before and after rectopexy. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Operative morbidity was 33 percent, and most complications were minor. Severe early complications included one large-bowel obstruction and one transient ureteric stenosis. Median time of follow-up was seven years in patients with rectal prolapse and 5.4 years in patients with internal rectal intussusception. Late complications included two rectovaginal fistulas and one lethal sigmoid fecaloma. Five patients underwent subtotal colectomy for severe constipation. There was one recurrent prolapse (1.6 percent). Functional evaluation showed that incontinence improved (P = 0.049), whereas the number of bowel movements per week decreased (P < 0.001). Frequency of emptying difficulties did not change significantly in patients with rectal prolapse but increased in patients with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Ripstein rectopexy can be performed with low mortality and recurrence rate, but with a high early complication rate. There were also some serious late complications. Continence was improved, although increased constipation was a problem in some patients, especially among those with internal rectal intussusception.

Adolescent↗

Pressure and prolapse--the cause of solitary rectal ulceration.

The cause of solitary rectal ulceration has been investigated using a method that radiologically visualises rectal voiding whilst simultaneously measuring intrarectal pressure and external anal sphincter electromyographic activity. Control subjects and patients with the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, both with and without mucosal ulceration, have been studied. A high incidence of rectal prolapse (94%) was present in the patients who voided. Overactivity of the anal sphincter during evacuation contributed to the fact that patients with mucosal ulceration required higher intrarectal pressures to void than the controls and the patients without mucosal ulceration. The results indicate that a combination of rectal prolapse and a high voiding pressure may act to cause the mucosal ulceration in this syndrome by exposing the rectal wall to a high transmural pressure gradient.

Adult↗

[Variations in rectal capacity and compliance after abdominal rectopexy].

The aim of this study was to attempt to gain insight in to the pathophysiologic characteristics of rectal prolapse by evaluating rectal compliance in patients with complete or incomplete rectal prolapse, before and after rectopexy. 21 subjects with complete rectal prolapse and 10 subjects with internal procidentia of rectum were treated with one of two abdominal rectopexies, according to Wells or according to a modified Ripstein's technique. For comparison, measurements were also carried out in 17 age and sex control subjects who had no bowel disturbances or anal symptoms. On distension with 40 cm H2O rectal volume amounted to 218 (175-255) ml for controls, 225 (178-256) ml for complete prolapses and 200 (125-225) ml for invaginations. Compliance amounted respectively to 9.5 (5-11,4), 8.5 (5-12,6), 7.5 (4-10,6) ml/cm H2O in the pressure interval 0-10 cm H2O with a decrease in compliance at higher pressure intervals. There was no correlation between rectal volume and compliance and gas or faecal incontinence, evacuation difficulties, feeling of blockade upon defecation and constipation. The effect of rectopexy has been separately evaluated according to the diagnosis. In complete prolapse significant changes of rectal capacity were observed for lower distending pressures (from 10 to 30), but not for higher (40-50). The compliance was significantly different for even lower distending pressures (0-10 cm H2O). In internal rectal procidentia rectopexy did not significantly changed capacity compliance. This work confirms the observations that the rectal compliance in rectal prolapse, complete and incomplete, do not differ from healthy controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

[Associated rectal and genital prolapse: value of Delorme's operation. A case report].

Rectal prolapse is a rare disorder, which usually affects patients suffering from genital prolapse (rectal prolapse is associated with genital prolapse in 50% of cases). On the basis of a study of the literature and with regard to one case history, the authors set out to explore the simplest and most effective way of treating these two disorders simultaneously. The treatment remains surgical and should combine treatment of the genital prolapse by vaginal route with treatment of the rectal prolapse by means of the Delorme operation. The mortality and morbidity rates are zero if this operation is used and the relapse rate is only 8 to 11% for the rectal prolapse. It would appear that the two approaches are rarely associated by the authors and would seem to be interesting to reconsider this question by indicating mixed treatment of the two prolapses whenever possible.

Aged↗

[Quality of life, symptoms of dyschezia, and anatomy after correction of rectal motility disorder].

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the quality of life of patients suffering from dyschezia and its correlation with symptomatic complaints and anatomical abnormalities, before and after elective surgery for rectal static disorder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted using a general quality of life questionnaire (SF36) and a constipation specific score (PAC-QoL), a dyschezia symptom score, and defecography. RESULTS: Thirty-eight female dyschesic patients (mean age 54 years) underwent surgery for rectocele with (n=16) or without (n=14) internal rectal prolapse, an isolated internal rectal prolapse (n=3), or a total rectal prolapse (n=5). Preoperative quality of life was low, correlated with the intensity of dyschezia. Seven months after surgery, quality of life and dyschezia improved independently of the amplitude of the anatomical correction. More items improved in the constipation specific score than on the quality of life questionnaire; they were correlated with the course of dyschezia symptoms. Neither incontinence nor irritable bowel syndrome affected evolution of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: Surgery improved initially low quality of life and symptomatic complaints in patients with dyschezia and a rectal static disorder, independently of anatomic repair. Differences in changes observed in the PAC-QoL and SF36 suggest different fields of application.

Adolescent↗

Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative electrophysiologic assessment for prediction of anal continence after rectopexy. METHODS: Forty-three patients with rectal prolapse (n = 26) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 17) underwent concentric-needle electromyography, fiber density determination by single-fiber electromyography of the external anal sphincter, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency evaluation before Ripstein rectopexy. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Anal continence was improved after rectopexy, both in patients with rectal prolapse (P = 0.06) and in those with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.003). Abnormal results were registered in one or several aspects of the electrophysiologic assessment in 31 (72 percent) of the patients. However, functional outcome with respect to continence was not predicted by preoperative electromyography or pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment results. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiologic examinations in the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception do not predict continence after the Ripstein rectopexy. The routine use of electrophysiologic assessment requires further definition.

Action Potentials↗

Spontaneous rupture of the distal colon with evisceration of small intestine through the anus: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Two cases of evisceration of the small intestine through a spontaneous perforation of the distal large bowel are presented, and the literature is reviewed. The condition is associated with a sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure and a past history of rectal prolapse. The etiology and management of this problem are discussed.

Aged↗

Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.

Twenty-one patients suffering from rectal prolapse (n = 15) or internal rectal procidentia (n = 6) were investigated clinically and by anorectal manometry prior to and six months following retopexy. Rectal prolapse was associated with incontinence in 67% (10/15) of the patients preoperatively. The moderately or severely incontinent patients had lower than normal maximum anal resting pressures (MAP) and those with severe incontinence also had lower than normal maximum squeeze pressure (MSP). Postoperatively only 20% (3/15) of the patients remained incontinent and none of them suffered severe incontinence. MAP values increased significantly indicating that improvement of the function of the internal anal sphincter may be one of the factors contributing to better continence. Rectal sensibility was impaired in patients with rectal prolapse as compared to 15 controls. There was no postoperative change. Patients with internal rectal procidentia had normal MAP and MSP and no postoperative change could be demonstrated.

Adult↗

Anorectal physiology in solitary ulcer syndrome: a case-matched series.

PURPOSE: Solitary ulcer syndrome is a rare condition characterized by inflammation and chronic ulcer of the rectal wall in patients suffering from outlet constipation. Despite similar surgical options (rectopexy, anterior resection), solitary ulcer syndrome may differ from overt rectal prolapse with regard to symptoms and pathogenesis. The present work analyzed differences between these conditions in a case-control physiology study. METHODS: From 1997 to 2002, 931 consecutive subjects were investigated in a single physiology unit for anorectal functional disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal physiology, and evacuation proctography were included in a prospective database. Diagnosis of solitary ulcer syndrome was based on both symptoms and anatomic features in 25 subjects with no overt rectal prolapse (21 females and 4 males; mean age, 37.2 +/- 15.7 years) and no past history of anorectal surgery. They were compared with age-matched and gender-matched subjects: 25 with outlet constipation (also matched on degree of internal procidentia), 25 with overt rectal prolapse without any mucosal change, and 14 with overt rectal prolapse and mucosal changes. RESULTS: Subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome reported symptomatic levels (digitations, pain, incontinence) similar to those of patients with outlet constipation, but they had significantly more constipation and less incontinence than patients with overt rectal prolapse. Compared with each of the three control groups (dyschezia, rectal prolapse without mucosal change, and rectal prolapse with mucosal change), subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome more frequently had an increasing anal pressure at strain (15 vs. 5, 3, and 1, respectively ; P < 0.01) and a paradoxical puborectalis contraction (15 vs. 9, 1, and 1, respectively; P < 0.05). With respect to evacuating proctography, complete rectal emptying was achieved less frequently in this group (5 vs. 12, 23, and 10, respectively; P < 0.05). Compared with patients with overt rectal prolapse, mean resting and squeezing anal pressures were significantly higher in both groups of subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome and with outlet constipation. Prevalence and levels of anatomic disorders (perineal descent, rectocele) did not differ among the four groups except for rectal prolapse grade and prevalence of enterocele (higher in overt rectal prolapse group). Interestingly, and despite matched controls for degree of intussusception, individuals with solitary ulcer syndrome had circular internal procidentia more often compared with those suffering from outlet constipation without mucosal lesions (15 vs. 8, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This case-controlled study quantifies functional anal disorders in patients suffering from solitary ulcer syndrome. Despite no proven etiologic factor, sphincter-obstructed defecation and circular internal procidentia both may play an important part in the pathogenesis and an exclusive surgical approach may not be appropriate in this context.

Adult↗

Randomized controlled study: radiofrequency coagulation and plication versus ligation and excision technique for rectal mucosal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: A novel technique of radiofrequency ablation and plication of the rectal mucosa (RAMP) as a treatment for rectal mucosal prolapse is reported. The results of this technique are compared with the conventional ligature and excision procedure (LEP). METHODS: Radiofrequency ablation was performed using an Ellman radiofrequency generator. Patients with rectal mucosal prolapse were randomized to undergo either LEP or RAMP. The intra- and postoperative outcomes and complications were recorded. RESULTS: RAMP on average resulted in reduced operation time, shorter hospitalization, and significantly less postoperative pain. Return to work was earlier and wound healing times were shorter than that of patients in the control group. The complication rates also were significantly shorter (9% in the RAMP group and 29% in the conventional LEP group). CONCLUSION: The procedure of radiofrequency ablation and plication of rectal mucosa is safe, effective, and swift. It can be proposed as an effective alternative to conventional surgical procedures.

Adult↗

Slow transit of the colon associated with severe constipation after the Ripstein operation. A clinical and physiologic study.

Eighteen patients with severe constipation after undergoing the Ripstein operation for rectal prolapse (n = 11) or internal rectal procidentia (n = 7) were studied with defecography, anorectal manometry, electromyography of the external anal sphincter and the puborectalis muscle, colonic transit time, and blood tests. Thirteen patients had slow-transit constipation. None showed a completely normal pattern in the parameters studied. The authors emphasize the importance of careful preoperative investigation to identify the patients who have associated colorectal disturbances together with their rectal prolapse or internal rectal procidentia.

Adult↗