Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Self-motion perception: assessment by real-time computer-generated animations.

We report a new procedure for assessing complex self-motion perception. In three experiments, subjects manipulated a 6 degree-of-freedom magnetic-field tracker which controlled the motion of a virtual avatar so that its motion corresponded to the subjects' perceived self-motion. The real-time animation created by this procedure was stored using a virtual video recorder for subsequent analysis. Combined real and illusory self-motion and vestibulo-ocular reflex eye movements were evoked by cross-coupled angular accelerations produced by roll and pitch head movements during passive yaw rotation in a chair. Contrary to previous reports, illusory self-motion did not correspond to expectations based on semicircular canal stimulation. Illusory pitch head-motion directions were as predicted for only 37% of trials; whereas, slow-phase eye movements were in the predicted direction for 98% of the trials. The real-time computer-generated animations procedure permits use of naive, untrained subjects who lack a vocabulary for reporting motion perception and is applicable to basic self-motion perception studies, evaluation of motion simulators, assessment of balance disorders and so on.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Effects of set-size and selective spatial attention on motion processing.

In order to investigate the effects of divided attention and selective spatial attention on motion processing, we obtained direction-of-motion thresholds using a stochastic motion display under various attentional manipulations and stimulus durations (100-600 ms). To investigate divided attention, we compared motion thresholds obtained when a single motion stimulus was presented in the visual field (set-size=1) to those obtained when the motion stimulus was presented amongst three confusable noise distractors (set-size=4). The magnitude of the observed detriment in performance with an increase in set-size from 1 to 4 could be accounted for by a simple decision model based on signal detection theory, which assumes that attentional resources are not limited in capacity. To investigate selective attention, we compared motion thresholds obtained when a valid pre-cue alerted the subject to the location of the to-be-presented motion stimulus to those obtained when no pre-cue was provided. As expected, the effect of pre-cueing was large when the visual field contained noise distractors, an effect we attribute to "noise reduction" (i.e. the pre-cue allows subjects to exclude irrelevant distractors that would otherwise impair performance). In the single motion stimulus display, we found a significant benefit of pre-cueing only at short durations (< or =150 ms), a result that can potentially be explained by a "time-to-orient" hypothesis (i.e. the pre-cue improves performance by eliminating the time it takes to orient attention to a peripheral stimulus at its onset, thereby increasing the time spent processing the stimulus). Thus, our results suggest that the visual motion system can analyze several stimuli simultaneously without limitations on sensory processing per se, and that spatial pre-cueing serves to reduce the effects of distractors and perhaps increase the effective processing time of the stimulus.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking.

It has been suggested that attention can disambiguate stimuli that have equal motion energy in opposite directions (e.g. a counterphasing grating), such that a clear motion direction is perceived. The direction of this movement is determined by the observer and can be changed at will. Assuming that the responses of front-end motion detectors are equal for the two opponent directions, it has been proposed that the unambiguous motion perceived with attentive tracking arises from an independent mechanism that monitors the shifts of attention directed to the moving feature of interest. However, while perceiving motion under attentive tracking conditions, observers often report a strong impression that they are making eye movements. In this study, we investigated whether systematic eye movements are present during attentive tracking and, as a result, could be responsible for the subjective experience of movement. We had observers track an object in smooth motion, apparent motion and ambiguous motion, either with eye movements or with attention. The results show that there are negligible eye movements during attentive tracking, which are neither systematic nor correlated with the stimulus. Given that neither eye movements nor retinal image motion can account for subjectively perceived motion, as well as the absence of any other plausible explanation, we find it tempting evidence for an earlier suggestion that the percept of movement must arise from a specialized mechanism.

Attention↗
PubMed2002

On the perceived location of global motion.

We measured the effects of coherent motion of one set of dots on the perceived location of Gaussian envelopes formed by luminance modulation of a second set of dots. Perceived shifts in envelope location in the direction of coherent motion were obtained even when the dots forming the envelopes did not physically move in the direction of coherent motion. In such cases, perceived shifts coincided with stimulus configurations that permitted motion integration of the envelope dots with the coherently moving dots, for example, when envelope dots moved in random directions as opposed to being static. In subsequent experiments we explored the type of motion integration underlying the positional shifts obtained. We discounted the possibility that the visual system incorrectly attributes motion signals associated with coherently moving dots to envelope dots by demonstrating that positional shifts could be obtained even when the coherent dots were laterally displaced to either side of the envelope dots such that the regions occupied by the dots did not overlap. We also discounted spatio-temporal summation within the receptive fields of low-spatial-frequency motion-sensitive mechanisms by demonstrating that positional shifts persisted even when the dot displays were high-pass filtered. These results, coupled with the observation that the proportion of coherently moving dots required to produce positional shifts correlated well with global motion thresholds measured for the same dot configurations, suggests that visual processes which underlie motion-dependent positional shifts are based at least in part on cooperative interactions of the type implicated in global motion.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

The spatial properties of opponent-motion normalization.

The final stage of the Adelson-Bergen model [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2 (1985) 284] computes net motion as the difference between directionally opposite energies E(L) and E(R). However, Georgeson and Scott-Samuel [Vis. Res. 39 (1999) 4393] found that human direction discrimination is better described by motion contrast (C(m))--a metric where opponent energy (E(L)-E(R)) is divided by flicker energy (E(L)+E(R)). In the present paper, we used a lateral masking paradigm to investigate the spatial properties of flicker energy involved in the normalization of opponent energy. Observers discriminated between left and right motion while viewing a checkerboard in which half of the checks contained a drifting sinusoid and the other half contained flicker (i.e. a counterphasing sinusoid). The relative luminance contrasts of flicker and motion checks determined the checkerboard's overall motion contrast C(m). We obtained selectivity functions for opponent-motion normalization by measuring C(m) thresholds whilst varying the orientation, spatial frequency, or size of flicker checks. In all conditions, performance (percent correct) decayed lawfully as we decreased motion contrast, validating the C(m) metric for our stimuli. Thresholds decreased with check size and also improved as we increased either the orientation or spatial-frequency difference between motion and flicker checks. Our data are inconsistent with Heeger-type normalization models [Vis. Neurosci. 9 (1992) 181] in which excitatory inputs are normalized by a non-selective pooling of inhibitory inputs, but data are consistent with the implicit assumption in Georgeson and Scott-Samuel's model that flicker normalization is localized in orientation, scale, and space. However, our lateral masking paradigm leaves open the possibility that the spatial properties of flicker normalization would be different if opponent and flicker energies spatially overlapped. Further characterization of motion contrast will require models of the spatial, temporal, and joint space-time properties of mechanisms mediating opponent-motion and flicker normalization.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2003

A neural network model of spiral-planar motion tuning in MSTd.

Neurophysiological studies in MSTd report the existence of motion pattern selective cells whose visual motion properties span a continuum of values, suggesting a role in estimates of self-motion from optic flow. Biologically motivated models of heading estimation support this view, having identified similar visual motion properties within their "neural" structures. While such models have addressed the computational sufficiency of their respective feed-forward designs they have not explicitly examined the underlying computational structures, particularly as they relate to the interaction between planar and spiral motion responses within MSTd. Here we use an expanded stimulus training set that includes planar motions to extend the range of neurophysiological properties identified within an existing network structure [Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 9 (1998) 467]. In doing so, we quantify the emergent planar motion properties within the network hidden layer and examine how they interact, functionally and computationally, with cardinal/spiral motion pattern responses. Throughout the hidden layer we demonstrate that the input activation associated with a unit's preferred planar motion is consistent with an overlapping gradient hypothesis [J. Neurophysiol. 65(6) (1991) 1346]. Together with the change to a peripheral excitation profile in the presence of a unit's preferred spiral motion these results suggest a more complex computational architecture in which the cell's 'classical' receptive field properties are dependent on the type of stimulus used to map them. Based on the computational model we propose an experimental paradigm to investigate the existence of equivalent computational structures in MSTd.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Failure of signed chromatic apparent motion with luminance masking.

It has been suggested that there are two types of chromatic motion mechanisms: signed chromatic motion, in which correspondence across successive frames is based on chromatic content of image regions, and unsigned chromatic motion based on movement of chromatically-defined borders. We investigate whether signed and unsigned red-green chromatic motion are mediated by a genuinely chromatic mechanism. Direction discrimination of signed and unsigned red-green chromatic motion were measured in the presence of a dynamic luminance masking noise. Increasing the luminance noise contrast systematically impaired signed motion, regardless of contrast and speed. This result suggests that signed red-green chromatic motion is derived from a luminance-based signal, rather than a genuinely chromatic motion mechanism. In the case of unsigned chromatic motion, there is no effect of luminance masking noise, indicating there exists a genuine chromatic mechanism for second-order motion perception.

Color Perception↗
PubMed2000

Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception.

We applied the external noise plus attention paradigm to study attention mechanisms involved in concurrent first-order and second-order motion perception at two spatial locations. Cued to attend to one of the locations, the observer was instructed to independently judge direction of motion of either first-order (Experiment 1) or second-order (Experiment 2) motion stimuli at both locations in every trial. Across trials, systematically controlled amounts of external noise were added to the motion displays. We measured motion threshold at three performance criteria in every attention x external noise condition. We find that observers could, without any loss, simultaneously compute first-order motion direction at two widely separated spatial locations across a broad range of external noise conditions. However, considerable loss occurred at the unattended location in processing second-order motion direction at two separated spatial locations. We conclude that, under the conditions investigated in the current study, (1) in first-order motion perception, the visual system could simultaneously process motion direction at two widely separated locations without any capacity limitation; (2) in second-order motion perception, attending to a spatial location enhances stimulus contrast at that location by a factor of about 1.37 (or equivalently, reduces the internal additive noise by a factor of about 0.73).

Attention↗
PubMed2000

The discrimination of abrupt changes in speed and direction of visual motion.

A random dot pattern that moved within an invisible aperture was used to present two motions contiguously in time. The motions differed slightly either in speed (Experiments 1 and 3) or in direction (Experiments 2 and 4) and the subject had to discriminate the sign of the change (e.g. increment or decrement). The same discrimination task was performed when the two motions were temporally separated by 1 s. In Experiments 1 and 2 discrimination thresholds were measured with motion durations of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 s and mean speeds of 2, 4, 8, and 16 degrees/s. In Experiments 3 and 4 thresholds were measured with aperture widths of 5 and 20 cm. The discrimination of contiguous motions progressively deteriorated with decreasing duration and mean speed of motion. For the lowest value of duration the Weber fraction for contiguous speeds was more than three times as the Weber fractions for separate speeds. For the same low value of duration the thresholds for discrimination of direction of contiguous motions were only about 50% higher than the thresholds for separate motions. The Weber fraction for contiguous speeds was ca. three times higher with the smaller aperture than with the larger one, provided the ratio 'aperture width mean speed' (i.e. the lifetime of the moving dots) was less than 0.3 s. Aperture width did not affect the discrimination of direction of contiguous motions. The discrimination of contiguous motions is discussed together with the known data for detection of changes in speed and direction. It is suggested that both, detection of changes in speed and discrimination of the sign of speed changes, may be performed by a common visual mechanism.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Relationship between motion sickness, migraine and menstruation in crew members of a "round the world" yacht race.

The similarities between the symptoms reported by patients with migraine and those experienced by severely motion sick individuals raises the question of whether the two conditions involve common mechanisms. In women, attacks of migraine may follow the menstrual cycle, and anecdote suggests this may also be true of motion sickness. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was a cyclical pattern in the occurrence of migraine/headache and motion sickness among crew members of a "round the world" yacht race. The participants were asked to complete pre- and postrace questionnaires that related to their susceptibility to motion sickness and headache/migraine; additionally, the female subjects were asked for details about their menstrual cycle. During the race the subjects completed a logbook to record the occurrence of motion sickness (using a four-point scale), migraine/headache (including the type of headache), menstruation, medication consumption and duties aboard the yacht. Female sailors were found to be more prone to motion sickness than the males. Motion sickness was also found to be linked to time at sea, and subjects who suffered migraine during the race were also more susceptible to motion sickness. A distinct pattern was found in the occurrence of motion sickness and headache that related to the menstrual cycle, although motion sickness and headache did not generally occur together in most of the subjects. A cyclical pattern was not obvious for the male subjects.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies.

The perceived direction of a grating moving behind an elongated aperture is biased towards the aperture's long axis. This "barber pole" illusion is a consequence of integrating one-dimensional (1D) or grating and two-dimensional (2D) or terminator motion signals. In humans, we recorded the ocular following responses to this stimulus. Tracking was always initiated at ultra-short latencies (approximately 85 ms) in the direction of grating motion. With elongated apertures, a later component was initiated 15-20 ms later in the direction of the terminator motion signals along the aperture's long axis. Amplitude of the later component was dependent upon the aperture's aspect ratio. Mean tracking direction at the end of the trial (135-175 ms after stimulus onset) was between the directions of the vector sum computed by integrating either terminator motion signals only or both grating and terminator motion signals. Introducing an elongated mask at the center of the "barber pole" did not affect the latency difference between early and later components, indicating that this latency shift was not due to foveal versus peripheral locations of 1D and 2D motion signals. Increasing the size of the foveal mask up to 90% of the stimulus area selectively reduced the strength of the grating motion signals and, consequently, the amplitude of the early component. Conversely, reducing the contrast of, or indenting the aperture's edges, selectively reduced the strength of terminator motion signals and, consequently, the amplitude of the later component. Latencies were never affected by these manipulations. These results tease apart an early component of tracking responses, driven by the grating motion signals and a later component, driven by the line-endings moving at the intersection between grating and aperture's borders. These results support the hypothesis of a parallel processing of 1D and 2D motion signals with different temporal dynamics.

Eye Movements↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The chromatic input to global motion perception.

For over 30 years there has been a controversy over whether color-defined motion can be perceived by the human visual system. Some results suggest that there is no chromatic motion mechanism at all, whereas others do find evidence for a purely chromatic motion mechanism. Here we examine the chromatic input to global motion processing for a range of color directions in the photopic luminance range. We measure contrast thresholds for global motion identification and simple detection using sparse random-dot kinematograms. The results show a discrepancy between the two chromatic axes: whereas it is possible for observers to perform the global motion task for stimuli modulated along the red-green axis, we could not assess the contrast threshold required for stimuli modulated along the yellowish-violet axis. The contrast required for detection for both axes, however, are well below the contrasts required for global motion identification. We conclude that there is a significant red-green input to global motion processing providing further evidence for the involvement of the parvocellular pathway. The lack of S-cone input to global motion processing suggests that the koniocellular pathway mediates the detection but not the processing of complex motion for our parameter range.

Artifacts↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The computational basis of an identified neuronal circuit for elementary motion detection in dipterous insects.

Based on comparative anatomical studies and electrophysiological experiments, we have identified a conserved subset of neurons in the lamina, medulla, and lobula of dipterous insects that are involved in retinotopic visual motion direction selectivity. Working from the photoreceptors inward, this neuronal subset includes lamina amacrine (alpha) cells, lamina monopolar (L2) cells, the basket T-cell (T1 or beta), the transmedullary cell Tm1, and the T5 bushy T-cell. Two GABA-immunoreactive neurons, the transmedullary cell Tm9 and a local interneuron at the level of T5 dendrites, are also implicated in the motion computation. We suggest that these neurons comprise the small-field elementary motion detector circuits the outputs of which are integrated by wide-field lobula plate tangential cells. We show that a computational model based on the available data about these neurons is consistent with existing models of biological elementary motion detection, and present a comparable version of the Hassenstein-Reichardt (HR) correlation model. Further, by using the model to synthesize a generic tangential cell, we show that it can account for the responses of lobula plate tangential cells to a wide range of transient stimuli, including responses which cannot be predicted using the HR model. This computational model of elementary motion detection is the first which derives specifically from the functional organization of a subset of retinotopic neurons supplying the lobula plate. A key prediction of this model is that elementary motion detector circuits respond quite differently to small-field transient stimulation than do spatially integrated motion processing neurons as observed in the lobula plate. In addition, this model suggests that the retinotopic motion information provided to wide-field motion-sensitive cells in the lobula is derived from a less refined stage of processing than motion inputs to the lobula plate.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Neuronal responses to orientation and motion contrast in cat striate cortex.

Responses of striate neurons to line textures were investigated in anesthetized and paralyzed adult cats. Light bars centered over the excitatory receptive field (RF) were presented with different texture surrounds composed of many similar bars. In two test series, responses of 169 neurons to textures with orientation contrast (surrounding bars orthogonal to the center bar) or motion contrast (surrounding bars moving opposite to the center bar) were compared to the responses to the corresponding uniform texture conditions (all lines parallel, coherent motion) and to the center bar alone. In the majority of neurons center bar responses were suppressed by the texture surrounds. Two main effects were found. Some neurons were generally suppressed by either texture surround. Other neurons were less suppressed by texture displaying orientation or motion (i.e. feature) contrast than by the respective uniform texture, so that their responses to orientation or motion contrast appeared to be relatively enhanced (preference for feature contrast). General suppression was obtained in 33% of neurons tested for orientation and in 19% of neurons tested for motion. Preference for orientation or motion contrast was obtained in 22% and 34% of the neurons, respectively, and was also seen in the mean response of the population. One hundred nineteen neurons were studied in both orientation and motion tests. General suppression was correlated across the orientation and motion dimension, but not preference for feature contrast. We also distinguished modulatory effects from end-zones and flanks using butterfly-configured texture patterns. Both regions contributed to the generally suppressive effects. Preference for orientation or motion contrast was not generated from either end-zones or flanks exclusively. Neurons with preference for feature contrast may form the physiological basis of the perceptual saliency of pop-out elements in line textures. If so, pop-out of motion and pop-out of orientation would be encoded in different pools of neurons at the level of striate cortex.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A laterally interconnected neural architecture in MST accounts for psychophysical discrimination of complex motion patterns.

The complex patterns of visual motion formed across the retina during self-motion, often referred to as optic flow, provide a rich source of information describing our dynamic relationship within the environment. Psychophysical studies indicate the existence of specialized detectors for component motion patterns (radial, circular, planar) that are consistent with the visual motion properties of cells in the medial superior temporal area (MST) of nonhuman primates. Here we use computational modeling and psychophysics to investigate the structural and functional role of these specialized detectors in performing a graded motion pattern (GMP) discrimination task. In the psychophysical task perceptual discrimination varied significantly with the type of motion pattern presented, suggesting perceptual correlates to the preferred motion bias reported in MST. Simulated perceptual discrimination in a population of independent MST-like neural responses showed inconsistent psychophysical performance that varied as a function of the visual motion properties within the population code. Robust psychophysical performance was achieved by fully interconnecting neural populations such that they inhibited nonpreferred units. Taken together, these results suggest that robust processing of the complex motion patterns associated with self-motion and optic flow may be mediated by an inhibitory structure of neural interactions in MST.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion.

Recent studies have shown that many people demonstrate erroneous beliefs about motion when asked to predict the trajectories of objects. The present experiments examine whether people can select as correct natural trajectories over anomalous ones when presented with the actual on-going event (motion condition) or static representations of the event (no-motion condition). McCloskey's curved tube problem was used as the event. Results indicate that adults benefit from the motion information in these stimuli, choosing the correct path more often in the motion condition. Men performed better than women in both conditions; this gender effect could not be attributed to formal instruction in physics. Only in the no-motion condition did any men prefer a path which reflected an impetus model of motion. Some women chose a curvilinear path in the motion condition, and in the no-motion condition the curvilinear path was their most often selected alternative. Fifth-grade children demonstrated no effect for gender and their path preferences resembled those of adult males. Children's responses failed to demonstrate a preference for those curvilinear paths which reflect an impetus-based approach to the problem. Adults' performance in the no-motion condition was not enhanced by instructions to employ mental imagery of the event.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Contribution of bottom-up and top-down motion processes to perceived position.

Perceived position depends on many factors, including motion present in a visual scene. Convincing evidence shows that high-level motion perception--which is driven by top-down processes such as attentional tracking or inferred motion--can influence the perceived position of an object. Is high-level motion sufficient to influence perceived position, and is attention to or awareness of motion direction necessary to displace objects' perceived positions? Consistent with previous reports, the first experiment revealed that the perception of motion, even when no physical motion was present, was sufficient to shift perceived position. A second experiment showed that when subjects were unable to identify the direction of a physically present motion stimulus, the apparent locations of other objects were still influenced. Thus, motion influences perceived position by at least two distinct processes. The first involves a passive, preattentive mechanism that does not depend on perceptual awareness; the second, a top-down process that depends on the perceptual awareness of motion direction. Each contributes to perceived position, but independently of the other.

Attention↗
PubMed1989

The perception of moving plaids reveals two motion-processing stages.

When viewed through a small aperture, the perceived motion exhibited by a long moving line or grating is ambiguous. This situation prevails because even a perfect machine could only detect motion perpendicular to a moving contour, so motion parallel to a contour is undetectable. The human visual system views the world through an aperture array--the neural receptive fields. Therefore a moving object is viewed through many small apertures and the motion within many of those apertures is ambiguous. This ambiguity may be resolved by monitoring the motion of a distinctive feature, such as a line-end or corner, and attributing to the larger object the motion of the feature. Alternatively, Adelson and Movshon have suggested that moving images are processed in two stages, that is, they are first decomposed into one-dimensional components which are later recombined to generate perceived object motion. For a moving plaid, defined as the sum of two drifting gratings, these alternative models generate different predictions concerning the resolution of the plaid's motion ambiguity. A feature monitor would respond to the motion of the intersections between gratings, whereas the two-stage motion processor would first decompose the plaid into its constituent gratings and subsequently recombine them to generate the perception of a moving plaid. Using speed discrimination to distinguish between the two models, I find that discrimination thresholds reflect the speed of a plaid's component gratings, rather than the speed of the plaid itself. This result supports the two-stage model. Although speed discrimination is limited by component processing, observers cannot directly access component speed. The only perceptually accessible velocity signal is generated by the second-stage pattern processing.

Humans↗