Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Extraction, Obstetrical”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50Linked to original sources
PubMed1978

Practical considerations for the routine application of left lateral Sims' position for vaginal delivery.

The lateral Sims' position was evaluated for routine use in vaginal deliveries. The study demonstrates that delivery in the lateral Sims' position is practical and easily mastered; most easily applied for spontaneous or uncomplicated outlet forceps delivery; of special advantage in breech deliveries, congestive heart failure, hip joint restriction, and leg varicosities; and well accepted by women looking for a less restricted and more natural delivery experience.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed1993

Health after childbirth: a comparison of normal and assisted vaginal delivery.

413 women were included in the study: 100 who had had a normal delivery and 313 who had participated in a randomised controlled comparison of forceps or ventouse delivery. The study comprised a questionnaire and assessment at 24-48 hours after delivery and a questionnaire in the second year after delivery. There was significantly more morbidity in the women in the instrumental delivery group compared to women in the normal delivery group at both the early assessment and long-term follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

After the afterbirth: a critical review of postpartum health relative to method of delivery.

Four million women give birth each year in the United States, yet postpartum health has gone largely unaddressed by researchers, clinicians, and women themselves. In light of rising US cesarean birth rates, a critical need exists to elucidate the ramifications of cesarean birth and assisted vaginal birth on postpartum health. This literature review explores the current state of knowledge on postpartum health in general and relative to method of delivery. Randomized trials and other published reports were selected from relevant databases and hand searches. The literature indicates that postpartum morbidity is widespread and affects the majority of women regardless of method of delivery. Women who have spontaneous vaginal birth experience less short- and long-term morbidity than women who undergo assisted vaginal birth or cesarean birth. To maximize postpartum health, providers of obstetric care need to protect the perineum during vaginal birth and avoid unnecessary cesarean deliveries. Clinicians must initiate the discussion about postpartum health antenatally and encourage women to enlist needed support early in the postpartum period. Flexibility in the schedule of postpartum care is essential. More research from the United States is warranted.

Australia↗
PubMed1996

A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup, a new vacuum extractor cup, and maternal-neonatal complication rates. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 10-month period operative vaginal deliveries were randomized between the obstetric forceps and the M-cup vacuum extractor cup. Maternal demographics, indication for intervention, analgesia, position, station, degree of asynclitism, fetal caput-molding, and time from application to delivery were prospectively recorded. Episiotomy and extensions, lacerations, and the reason for abandonment of the randomized instrument were noted in both groups. Fetal weight, Apgar scores, cord arterial gases, hyperbilirubinemia, phototherapy, and any evidence of fetal trauma were documented at delivery or in the nursery. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven women were randomized, 315 in the forceps group and 322 in the M-cup group. There were no differences in maternal demographic variables. The station, position, degree of asynclitism, or requirement for rotation was not different between the groups. The corrected efficacy rates were forceps 92% and M-cup 94% (p = 0.217). The M-cup deliveries were accomplished more rapidly than forceps deliveries (p < 0.001) and were associated with a lower rate of episiotomy (p < 0.001), third-degree (p < 0.001) and fourth-degree (p = 0.002) lacerations, but blood loss as clinically estimated (p = 0.232) or as measured by hemoglobin levels (p = 0.166) was not significantly different. Forceps deliveries were associated with fewer clinically diagnosed cephalhematomas (p = 0.015) than M-cup deliveries were, but there were no differences in the number of neonates diagnosed with hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.377) or in the number of infants treated with phototherapy (p = 0.660). CONCLUSIONS: The M-cup vacuum extractor cup appears to be as efficient (and faster) than the obstetric forceps but is associated with significantly more fetal cephalhematomas, whereas maternal injuries are more common with the forceps.

Adult↗