Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “statistical genetics”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

[Semantics of genetic correlation analysis].

A theory of genetic-correlation analysis has been put forward on the basis of notions concerning general and special codispersions . The complete set of genetic-correlation indexes is received and their genetic-statistical meaning revealed. The models for genetical component analysis of general and special codispersions of correlative connections are constructed.

Genetic Variation↗
PubMed1997

Linkage disequilibrium between the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) and bipolar disorder: extending the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) to examine genetic heterogeneity.

Since its introduction into the statistical genetics literature, the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) has seen widespread use in analyses of linkage and association due not only to its simplicity but also to its desirable properties relative to other within-family analytic methods. In this paper, we describe an extension to the TDT useful for examining genetic heterogeneity. This extension uses contingency table analyses such as log-linear analysis to test for differences in linkage disequilibrium across levels of one or more moderator variables. We applied these analyses to test for linkage disequilibrium between the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) and bipolar disorder, as well as for genetic heterogeneity due to sex, diagnostic breadth, and study site. Using data from two studies (the UCSD/UBC and Cardiff data sets), we found evidence suggesting linkage disequilibrium between DAT1 and bipolar disorder, as well as heterogeneity due to diagnostic breadth and study site.

Alleles↗
PubMed2003

Molecular investigation on strain genetic relatedness and population structure of Beauveria bassiana.

Triplicate molecular methods, i.e. polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the pr1 gene, microsatellite markers and 28S rDNA haplotyping by detecting the presence or absence of group I introns, were used for population study of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana. The findings showed that the average genetic diversity index of geographical populations was significantly smaller than that of populations derived from insect host orders, indicating that the genetic relatedness of B. bassiana strains was highly associated with geographical locality rather than insect host species. The reproductive style of all the B. bassiana populations was found to be non-clonal. Population structure analysis revealed that the average divergent coefficient among populations of B. bassiana was far below 1 (0.1112), which indicated that there was no significant genetic differentiation between populations, and that the overall genetic diversity mainly resulted from the genetic variations within geographical populations. Statistically, genetic distances between populations were positively correlated with geographical distances, suggesting that geographical separation poses an obstacle to the possibility and frequency of genetic exchanges between populations. On the other hand, gene flow was indirectly established to occur between B. bassiana populations.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Tg.AC genetically altered mouse: assay working group overview of available data.

In a Government/Industry/Academic partnership to evaluate alternative approaches to carcinogenicity testing, 21 pharmaceutical agents representing a variety of chemical and pharmacological classes and possessing known human and or rodent carcinogenic potential were selected for study in several rodent models. The studies from this partnership project, coordinated by the International Life Sciences Institute, provide additional data to better understand the models' limitations and sensitivity in identifying carcinogens. The results of these alternative model studies were reviewed by members of Assay Working Groups (AWG) composed of scientists from government and industry with expertise in toxicology, genetics, statistics, and pathology. The Tg.AC genetically manipulated mouse was one of the models selected for this project based on previous studies indicating that Tg.AC mice seem to respond to topical application of either mutagenic or nonmutagenic carcinogens with papilloma formation at the site of application. This communication describes the results and AWG interpretations of studies conducted on 14 chemicals administered by the topical and oral (gavage and/or diet) routes to Tg.AC genetically manipulated mice. Cyclosporin A, an immunosuppresant human carcinogen, ethinyl estradiol and diethylstilbestrol (human hormone carcinogens) and clofibrate, an hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferator in rodents, were considered clearly positive in the topical studies. In the oral studies, ethinyl estradiol and diethylstilbestrol were negative, cyclosporin was considered equivocal, and results were not available for the clofibrate study. Of the 3 genotoxic human carcinogens (phenacetin, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide), phenacetin was negative by both the topical and oral routes. Melphalan and cyclophosphamide are, respectively, direct and indirect DNA alkylating agents and topical administration of both caused equivocal responses. With the exception of clofibrate, Tg.AC mice did not exhibit tumor responses to the rodent carcinogens that were putative human noncarcinogens, (di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, methapyraline HCl, phenobarbital Na, reserpine, sulfamethoxazole or WY-14643, or the nongenotoxic, noncarcinogen, sulfisoxazole) regardless of route of administration. Based on the observed responses in these studies, it was concluded by the AWG that the Tg.AC model was not overly sensitive and possesses utility as an adjunct to the battery of toxicity studies used to establish human carcinogenic risk.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗