[Criteria for somatization studied in an outpatient clinic for general internal medicine].
OBJECTIVE: To compare the evolution of bodily symptoms and the frequency of medical consultation using three different operational definitions of 'somatization'. DESIGN: Descriptive follow-up study. SETTING: General Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic of Leiden University Hospital, the Netherlands. METHOD: Information about physical and psychic symptoms and about the somatic-medical diagnosis was collected in a group of 158 newly referred patients. The concept of 'somatization' was operationalized in three ways: a) seeking medical consultation for somatically unexplained symptoms; b) seeking medical consultation for somatically unexplained symptoms combined with an anxiety disorder or a depressive disorder according to the 'present state examination'; c) seeking medical consultation for somatically unexplained symptoms combined with a somatization disorder or hypochondria according to the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) III R criteria. After a follow-up period of 1.2 years, information was collected from the entire study group about the evolution of the physical symptoms and the frequency of medical consultation. RESULTS: Patients with somatically unexplained symptoms combined with a somatization disorder or hypochondria were characterized in the follow-up by numerous physical symptoms and a high frequency of medical consultation. Compared with the other patients with unexplained symptoms, they visited the general practitioner during the follow-up period 2.5 times as often, saw specialists twice as often and were admitted to a 'somatic' hospital, 6 times as often. CONCLUSION: Using criteria of low restrictiveness for somatization, a large group of patients were identified with a relatively normal (average) illness behaviour. Using more restrictive criteria led to identification of a smaller group with more extreme illness behaviour.